Slashdot Mirror


Second Life To Open Source Server Code

mrspin writes "Having already taken the timid steps of open-sourcing the code for its client software, Linden Lab has confirmed that they'll be going the whole way, and will soon be opening up the server code for Second Life. This furthers Second Life's ambitions to be a fully distributed 3D network — built on interoperability and not owned by one company — a bit like the Internet itself. ZDNet's The Social Web asks: 'who will be the first to offer Second Life hosting or use the server code for their own internal purposes? IBM would be an obvious candidate, perhaps offering corporate Second Life services. And for the rest of us? GoogleLife, free virtual land — ad supported of course. It's certainly a possibility.'"

7 of 221 comments (clear)

  1. So what's there angle? by rednip · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The real buzz over second life is the ability to create wealth playing the game. Seems to me that they will always be the 'Federal Reserve' for their creation, and their intention is to make money by creating it. If anything kills second life, it will be a widely distributed unlimited money hack.

    --
    The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
  2. Real Open Source by Trevor · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Second Life open client code is already out of sync with the production code because Linden Lab just threw it over the wall and then went on happily producing private versions of their software.

    Instead of waiting for them to do the same with the server, sidestep them altogether with libsecondlife.org's OpenSim or pick a new platform altogether from the growing list of real open source projects: Open Croquet, Ogoglio.com (my project), or Verse.

  3. N/T by PatrickThomson · · Score: 5, Funny

    Second life is the new IRC? I can see it happening. I propose an interface to allow people to be present in second life from an IRC client.

    > look
    You are in a room of user-created content. Exits are north, south, and dennis.

    --
    I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
  4. Oh and while you're doing that by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Could someone build at least one world in which you purchase "land" based on the power/CPU requirements of the land, rather than its (virtual) area.

    The "necessity" of getting a return on your per-square-meter fees causes SL to be overtaken by casinos and brothels. Make the fee dependent on something of actual economic value.

    Just thinking aloud, don't have time to do it myself

    --
    My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
  5. Croquet? by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Informative

    I would ask those actually excited by this announcement to please inspect Croquet, a collaborative, three-dimensional framework for cooperative computing that is built atop Squeak, the modern implementation of Smalltalk by Alan Kay and others.

    Croquet is Open and Free now. It's in its early stages, but so is second life.

    I don't know if Croquet is an excellent choice for building a metaverse, but I'm pretty sure it's a better choice than Second Life.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  6. Linden labs not in it to make money by Danathar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Those of you who can't understand ANY motivation if it does not involve making money will have a hard time even considering this possibility.

    I've had the sneaking suspicion that Linden Labs may not be a for-profit company in that their goal is to get rich and IPO.

    My conspiracy theory is that the people who are funding Linden Labs, primarily Bezos and other Internet rich boys with cash set up Linden Labs to PRIMARILY develop and get the tech of a 3d world into wide use. Then their companies (Amazon for instance which is ALREADY working heavily in SL) utilize it in their buisness.

    My inconclusive evidence?

    1. They just don't seem interested in IPOing, when asked it's not really a priority. If you are going to IPO you do it when the hype is big.

    2. They are open sourcing the client and server. If you were going to make money you'd charge a small but significant fee. Open sourcing the whole thing makes no sense. No, I don't think they are going the sendmail or mysql model by providing "consulting services". They don't seem interested in that either.

    3. In their own Ego driven way somebody like Bezos could change the world. Ego inflation feels great!

    So there..poopoo on it all you want. Not everything in the world is primarily motivated by money and profit.

  7. Re:Say hello to Sin City by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, that's the version hosted in Utah...

    (ducks)