Open WAP = Probable Cause?
RockoTDF writes "A court in texas has ruled that an open WAP is not a sufficient defense against child pornography charges, a ruling which could carry over to p2p users. In addition, it appears that an open WAP could be seen as probable cause by law enforcement."
Open WAP = Probably Cause?
CmdrTaco = Editor?
My grammar sucks probably 'cause I have open WAP.
"I'm sorry your honor, I'd like to request a brief recess so that I can bone the prosecution behind my assistant DA/girlfriend's back."
"Very well, Mr.McCoy, but I'll remind you that this is a high-profile, ripped-from-the-headlines case that will decide the fate of alleged child pornographers for years to come, and I--Mr.McCoy, could you at least wait until the courtroom has been cleared?"
Yes, it's offtopic, but have you ever WATCHED that show?
No worries, I've changed it for you already. :P
Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
Since Europe is not the uniform entity some people seem to think it is, your statement does not hold much weight.
I am in europe (germany) and have never heard of any such rules.
Would you care to elaborate?
I would rather have the right to have a jury of kittens decide what the facts are if I'm charged with a crime...Think about that! Everyone would be busy looking at those cute balls of fur rolling around in a cardboard box, while I sneak away with the judges hot daughter! W00t!
Hence the "democracy vs republic" distinction. I was obviously right on at least one count: the argument is both inevitable and obligatory...
Be careful of your thoughts; they could become words at any minute...