Wikipedia Releases Offline CD

An anonymous reader writes "WikipediaOnDVD, with cooperation with the Wikipedia community, has released its first offline test version. The articles were selected by Wikipedians and reviewed for accuracy, vandalism, and importance. Nearly 2,000 core Wikipedia articles will be sold on compact disc to give people without a net connection access to highlights of the popular web resource. The CD can be purchased or downloaded online via their site or the torrent."

Comments

Is there a pool going yet?

[zappepcs]

I pick 77 as the number of articles on the CD that will be wrong

Someone tell them

[MouseR]

[...] to give people without a net connection access to highlights [...]. The CD can be purchased or downloaded online [...]

Now that's a hefty business plan.

Re:Someone tell them

[BinaryPower]

What is this...offline?

Re:Someone tell them

[jellomizer]

Look here for the answer

Doesn't this kinda defeat the purpose?

[garcia]

Wikipedia is a powerful tool because it can be constantly and immediately updated with new information as it becomes available. By burning it onto CD and distributing it, it becomes almost the same as any other encyclopedia available minus the cost and the fact that it doesn't carry the same reputation.

It's a good idea in theory but in reality it's sorta pointless.

Re:Doesn't this kinda defeat the purpose?

[brian0918]

So basically you're saying that if people can't get the most updated information, they shouldn't get any information at all? Brilliant!

Re:Doesn't this kinda defeat the purpose?

[Vampyre_Dark]

Pointless? I think that's way off base.

There was a point when your random, off the shelf encyclopedia didn't have a reputation either. That's built up over time. And a cheap disc of Wikipedia can be very helpful to some people. The fact that anyone can add to it doesn't change the fact that it's still an encyclopedia.

It's biggest strength of wikipedia is also it's biggest weakness. You can't read about any software that isn't under the gpl without seeing a page that's been hijacked by GPL zealots time after time. Hell, the fact that 3DS Max is NOT under the GPL and free is somehow more important than anything else about the software, despite the fact that's it's the industry leader/standard 3d modeller and renderer. The articles about 3D software are all really about how you should be using Blender instead, because it's GPL. Just like every other software page. So much for the NPOV policy.

An article about a person in the public eye often turns into a battle gound and then a daily log of that person's life by an obssessed fan who thinks what they had for breakfast on friday is important information. Factual information that paints them in negative light is often editted out by these same people.

Then we have magazines and newspapers editors who think it's funny to write articles about how they vandalized an article. We have Stephen Colbert logging onto Wikipedia during his show, and making article edits. Even my local newspaper had an article written that detailed a spree of silly article edits along the lines of turning into a werewolf if you visit a certain country on a certain date. This is a columnist in his 50s, not a 15 year old kid.

The whole thing is overrun by GPL Zealots, anti corporate hippies, immature kids, obssessed fans, bible thumpers, etc. None of these types are competant enough to make Neutral Point Of View contributions. Not to mention the fanboys who flood serious articles with video game, comic book, and star wars|trek references.

How is a 12 year old kid, taking everything in there at face value, supposed to seperate the BS from the truth so they can get their school project done? Especially when you have older people who should know better, filling it with such facts as 'E = MC Hammer'.

The disc distribution can solve that, and users can feel confident that the information contained therein is actually worth something. The disc may be the only version that is ever really usefull as an encyclopedia. The online version could be best used as a temporary editing version, with real versions being pressed and distributed, and competantly edited.

Re:No net connection?

[soundhack]

This reminds me of a retail cd drive that came with no printed installation instructions, the manual was on a CD.

Re:No net connection?

[HTH NE1]

This reminds me of a retail cd drive that came with no printed installation instructions, the manual was on a CD.

Let me guess: it contained a PDF containing a single word: "Congratulations".

Re:No net connection?

[CastrTroy]

It would be nice to be able to take wikipedia with you when you don't have a net connection, even if you usually have one. If you're using your laptop on the plane, it might be nice to look up something on wikipedia. That being said, I think they should implement it differently. I'm not sure how their repository system works, but it should be possible to download the whole thing, and then download only the changes when you need it updated. Kind of like with CVS or SVN.

Re:shouldn't it be wikipedia on CD?

[Hachey]

Not only is this a test release of Wikipedia 0.5, but nominating articles for the release isn't a quick process. Get over there and nominate some for 0.7; lets get this baby to fit on a DVD. I share your zeal.

Its a writable CD

[Timesprout]

so you can edit it. Also it will only work if you place it in a publically accessible network drive so others can make changes too.

Re:shouldn't it be wikipedia on CD?

[MightyYar]

Wikipedia on CD was already taken by a guy providing only 1.44 MB floppy images.

The next offline CD release

[Hachey]

This is a release for Wikipedia 0.5. The next release is Wikipedia 0.7, and if you see something you not in 0.5 that you want in 0.7, cruise on over to the nominations page and let 'em know.

Great!

[roelbj]

Now my information can be wrong AND outdated.

Intermittent connection

[tepples]

If somebody has 15 minutes of net connection, would he look at live versions of Wikipedia articles for those 15 minutes, or would he spend 15 minutes buying the disc to take home to use on his own computer without an Internet connection? Examples of such intermittent connection include Wi-Fi hotspots, public libraries, and (to a lesser extent) dial-up.

Re:Intermittent connection

[NerveGas]

The real benefit here, which seems to have been overlooked, is access to all of that information in places where bandwidth is either very poor or non-existant - or, where political pressures make it impossible or unwise to view the information online. I could imagine these DVDs being passed around in countries like China...