Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Cancels Major Developers' Conference

Kurtz'sKompund writes "Microsoft has cancelled its autumn Professional Developers Conference, citing bad timing in light of the launch of important infrastructure and platform products. This isn't the first time they have cancelled a PDC, for similar reasons."

114 comments

  1. Gotta Fix 'Em All! by andrewd18 · · Score: 4, Funny

    from the don't-distracte-me-from-Vista dept.
    Sorry, no developer conference. We're still too busy working out all the typos.
    1. Re:Gotta Fix 'Em All! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just switch back from Office 2007 to Office 2003.

      It seems Microsoft forgot about High Contrast Black in the interim.

    2. Re:Gotta Fix 'Em All! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, no developer conference. We're still too busy working out all the typos.

      Would that include fixing words like Customize, Personalize, Color, and Center? ;-)

      Off topic, but I tried Vista on a friend's laptop the other day and immediately noticed the American spelling. Went to switch to English (UK) but it doesn't exist! I'm too used to KDE by now, which does have the 'translation'.

      Not sure if it was like that in XP, but it seems more noticeable in Vista because you're bombarded with so many links and related items everywhere.

    3. Re:Gotta Fix 'Em All! by bobo+mahoney · · Score: 1

      is theat why MS code is so bad poeple there can't sepll?

      --
      Bobo Mahoney
    4. Re:Gotta Fix 'Em All! by alx5000 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I only have a couple words...

      !developers, !developers, !developers...

      --
      My 0.02 cents
    5. Re:Gotta Fix 'Em All! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Sounds like you're suggesting we get together and gang! the developers... is that right?

    6. Re:Gotta Fix 'Em All! by Divebus · · Score: 3, Funny

      The Microsoft Developer Conference happens on June 11-15 in San Francisco where they can pick up the beta of Vista SP1.

      --

      Most of the stuff on /. won't survive first contact with facts.
    7. Re:Gotta Fix 'Em All! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You have to buy the UK edition for that. The reason is that by having it as a separate software that is "translated" in Ireland, it counts as being manufactured inside the EU and thus they don't have to pay customs/import taxes.

    8. Re:Gotta Fix 'Em All! by linuxci · · Score: 1

      My (work) copy of XP doesn't have English English spelling and that's most definitely a legit copy purchased in the UK.

    9. Re:Gotta Fix 'Em All! by chrish · · Score: 1

      Be sure to bring your Zunes so you can squirt music all over the place.

      --
      - chrish
    10. Re:Gotta Fix 'Em All! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You bought a Zune?! Quick, tell the press who you are. Everybody has been searching for you. We promise not to tell your psychiatrist.

  2. Insert obligatory Steve B. quote here by Nybble's+Byte · · Score: 5, Funny

    By the way, who was chairing the conference?

    1. Re:Insert obligatory Steve B. quote here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the first SB chair joke that has been funny since the incident happened. Congrats.

    2. Re:Insert obligatory Steve B. quote here by PavementPizza · · Score: 1
      FTFS (from the fine submission):

      This isn't the first time they have cancelled a PDC, for similar reasons."
      Translating into Ballmerese: "I'm going to fucking bury PDC, I have done it before and I will do it again. I'm going to FUCKING KILL PDC!"
      --
      Viper is the preferred editor of the Emacs operating system.
    3. Re:Insert obligatory Steve B. quote here by Zackbass · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of that TMBG song "Thank You for Coming to the Show"

      "Thank you Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer, thank you for chairing the show!"

      --
      You gotta find first gear in your giant robot car
    4. Re:Insert obligatory Steve B. quote here by eclectro · · Score: 1

      Actually they had to cancel the conference because they couldn't 'squirt' it.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    5. Re:Insert obligatory Steve B. quote here by dal20402 · · Score: 1

      You know Ballmer has always wished he could squirt *something*.

      Thus the Zune...

  3. Wouldn't that be when it's needed most? by moderatorrater · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Between the office's ribbon interface and the actual launch of Vista, you'd think that now would be the most important time to have a developers conference. With all the new challenges and the conference still several months away, wouldn't it be wiser to schedule the time now and make sure that critical issues are dealt with early?

    1. Re:Wouldn't that be when it's needed most? by Uniquitous · · Score: 1

      Probably they don't want to brief their would-be developers on buggy platforms, or API's still subject to change. The veterans wouldn't hold it against them (they're hardened to such things) but the journeyman-level coders would say the hell with it and turn to Java or Ruby.

    2. Re:Wouldn't that be when it's needed most? by Anarchysoft · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Between the office's ribbon interface and the actual launch of Vista, you'd think that now would be the most important time to have a developers conference. With all the new challenges and the conference still several months away, wouldn't it be wiser to schedule the time now and make sure that critical issues are dealt with early? I totally agree. This is exactly when they should be promoting development on Vista including things like how to get the most out of Windows Presentation Framework with XAML, handle porting issues, the new security features, etc! A peek at how Apple hypes 10.5 to developers should illuminate the strategy.
    3. Re:Wouldn't that be when it's needed most? by siliconwafer · · Score: 2

      As a developer I agree with you, but lets not forget that Vista was delayed, the Zune has been sucking ... MS shareholders don't care about "critical issues", they care about revenue for the current quarter and fiscal year. A developers conference, in the eyes of a shareholder, is a distraction and misalignment of priorities.

    4. Re:Wouldn't that be when it's needed most? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The veterans wouldn't hold it against them (they're hardened to such things) but the journeyman-level coders would say the hell with it and turn to Java or Ruby.
      Too late for them to "save" me. I worked on some C# stuff, and wished I had decent documentation for .Net's Bluetooth API. A list of available classes and functions is far from sufficient, but it would have been an improvement.
  4. Re:and 10,000 OSS developers.... by jcgf · · Score: 1

    I'd bet that the OSS developers won't even notice.

  5. Re:and 10,000 OSS developers.... by ClosedSource · · Score: 5, Funny

    Unfortunately, they're all working on their own individual version of a ground-breaking text editor and extensible platform that will eclipse Eclipse.

  6. Conference Cancelled by eebra82 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Microsoft has cancelled its autumn Professional Developers, Developers, Developers Conference, citing there are too many chairs near the podium. This isn't the first time they have cancelled a PDC, for similar reasons.

  7. DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS... by ArcherB · · Score: 1
    --
    There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
  8. Calling all Pavlov's Dogs! by LibertineR · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    Microsoft has given you another opportunity to show us your great anti-Microsoft wit.

    On a serious note: Has another company come close to supporting it's developers better than Microsoft?

    So, they cancel a PDC. So what?

    I keep reminding people that Microsoft is a MARKETING driven organization. No doubt, when they schedule the next PDC, it will be for THEIR benefit, not yours.

    Dont like it? There are other options available.

    Why bitch, bitches?

    1. Re:Calling all Pavlov's Dogs! by Foofoobar · · Score: 1

      Put down the chair Steve and come out with your hands up.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    2. Re:Calling all Pavlov's Dogs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Small penis?

  9. I work with MS products. by ushering05401 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    VS2005 targeting Win 2000 through Vista to be exact. Nice product VS2005. I can write very nice apps with c# and the .NET framework.

    I adopted MS because the shop I began working IT with served mostly MS customers, and now my shop does as well... just a reality of working in a niche market where MS has been the accesible OS for so many years.

    Why, I ask, am I pulling my hair out every other week?

    Does a properly run company cause a dedicated client to want to pull his already diminishing supply of hair from his head every time he reads their press releases?

    Products that have been *both* delayed and had functionality removed in the last 8 months:
    Vista
    Viridian (virtualization)
    Server 2008 (announced that a major incremental will be released in 2009 to replace the functionality if that actually happens... so who the fuck is going to upgrade in '08?)

    I depend on this shit. Why? Because you formed a friggin monopoly and all of my potential customers use your products.

    Get your shit together.

    Regards.

    1. Re:I work with MS products. by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I depend on this shit. Why? Because you formed a friggin monopoly and all of my potential customers use your products.

      Get your shit together.
      They don't have to. As you said, they're a monopoly, and you (or your predecessors) and your customers (or their predecessors) are the ones that created this ugly beast. You have all reaped what you have sowed by sticking to a one-size-fits-all solution which most people have known for over fifteen years does not in fact fit all sizes. That they are a monopoly means that they are by and large protected from market forces that would long ago have left any other company that used the same questionable marketing and development tactics that you ascribe to Microsoft bankrupt and half forgotten.
      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:I work with MS products. by Sweetshark · · Score: 2, Funny

      Isnt it nice to be the squirrel with cement shoes when the 800 lbs. gorilla behind you starts to stumble?

    3. Re:I work with MS products. by ushering05401 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I agree.

      Unfortunately, as I have posted on other threads here, most of my customers rely on multiple small applications to run their businesses. Porting them to OSS would be a massive undertaking and would require cash that most of them don't have, and applications that don't exist (take construction-specific management apps for instance).

      I have defended MONO and it's developers on this site and others with the stated purpose of promoting an alternative to MS. The fact remains, however, that most of my customers do not have equal options on OSS platforms at the current time.

      I would be unable to develop equal options considering the wide variety of applications that have developed in the MS ecosystem over the last 15 years or so, and that my customers depend upon.

      I would walk away from MS, but that would involve abandoning my customers who are locked in, and with whom I share the common goal of feeding our families by running our own companies instead of working for others.

      Regards.

    4. Re:I work with MS products. by secPM_MS · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You assume that customers upgrade to get major new feature sets. While new feature sets are great for marketing aimed at retail customers, who will in general use very few of the features (new or otherwise), enterprise / corporate markets tend to be much more conservative. In particular, they want MS to do as little damage as possible to their existing enterprise apps, many of which were written with little if any consideration for security or reliability. This legacy tail greatly complicates Microsoft's ability to ship products, as enormous amounts of effort have to be expended to minimize the app compat hit.

      Microsoft executives pulled neat features from Vista (WinFS and others) because they were likely to consititute too much of a security risk. Other changes were made, despite app compat issues, to increase system security. Vista, far more than XP, allows a user to run as a normal user without any administrative credentials (If I have to do any administrative chore, I have to enter my machine administrator credentials, equivalent to su root). From my point of view, the increase in security associated with Vista compared to XP justifies it. I run with all the neat visuals turned off, so my screen is in "classic" mode. It speeds the system up.

      Why do I run Windows? For the same reason as most users -- For the wide variety of apps that run on it (both commercial and shareware). Microsoft created an effective ecosystem. While the OSS community is trying, they are nowhere close -- just look at all the Linux distros, let alone the various BSD's. Over time, the OSS space will close the difference, but the Windows system is richer now. The security bulletin data suggests that the security push did have a significant impact, with high-impact security bulletins reduced by ~ 2X or more.

    5. Re:I work with MS products. by BeerCat · · Score: 1

      So, in a nutshell, those with the desire to change don't have the money, while those with the money don't desire change.

      --
      "She's furniture with a pulse"
    6. Re:I work with MS products. by yabos · · Score: 1

      I don't know what's wrong with MS but they have some serious problems producing software. Maybe it's trying to support legacy software all the time. Perhaps they should just bite the bullet and break all the old clunky programs that use undocumented APIs etc.. I'm actually pretty happy that they are bombing on everything though because I truly hate using Windows.

    7. Re:I work with MS products. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > just a reality of working in a niche market where MS has been the accesible OS

      Your niche market is there only until MS decides that there is enough revenue for them to take that market from you.

      They may do so by buying you, or a competitors similar product, or by throwing together something that almost works well enough. As soon as there is a _Microsoft_ branded product your niche market vanishes.

      Not only that but your licence to use MS development tools will stop you developing anything that competes with a Microsoft product, even if that is a rip off of what you have been doing for years.

    8. Re:I work with MS products. by The_Sledge · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that they will threaten to sue you for patent violation because *YOU* stole their idea in the first place (or at least used their proprietary code without their permission).

      If you kick up a stink and threaten them back, they'll drag you through the court system and bankrupt you in the process, all while continuing development of their facsimile of your application, allowing it to go through 4 version upgrades and UI "improvements", forcing customers into accepting that their solution is the *only* solution for that vertical.

      This is one "tall poppy" that we will rejoice if it gets cut down.

      --
      HEX offender mugshot ID: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    9. Re:I work with MS products. by nbritton · · Score: 1

      "I would be unable to develop equal options considering the wide variety of applications that have developed in the MS ecosystem over the last 15 years or so, and that my customers depend upon."

      You don't need to, because... http://www.nbritton.org/uploads/windows_for_mac.pn g

      ---
      Yes it's real.
  10. DEVELOPERS, DEVELOPERS, DEVELOPERS, DEVELOPERS!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, I was counting on attending Mr.Balmer presentation.

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6304687408 656696643

  11. Developers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Developers! Developers! Developers! Developers! Developers! Developers! Developers! Developers! Developers! Developers! Developers! Developers!

  12. and why exactly is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Woohoo! MSFT cancels conference! must be a sign of their dismissal!

    Why is this news? why is this selected as relevant news.

    This is not relevant news, the anti-MSFT bias is completed dated and overdone.

    get a fucking life

  13. oops by mythar · · Score: 4, Funny

    just missed the allow button.

  14. Re:and 10,000 OSS developers.... by slo · · Score: 1

    A worthy goal. My experiences with eclipse have largely painful. Those who do not understand emacs are condemned to reimplement it, poorly. Eclipse seems to be obscure, bloated, and buggy. It behaves more like an MS office app than a programmer's tool; you can't obviously/easily reextend the extensions. We don't need to be reductionist viers; there needs to be a middle ground. Unfortunately emacs hasn't captured the imagination of next gen coders, and thus seems to be withering.

  15. That's the dumbest fucking idea I've heard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    since I've been at Microsoft.

  16. Translation... by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "As the PDC is the definitive developer event focused on the future of the Microsoft platform, we try to align it to be in front of major platform milestones"

    Translation...

    "The things we wanted to show at the PDC are so far behind schedule that we would look like fools for even demoing the software."

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    1. Re:Translation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, I hear they're gonna deliver Cairo by the end of the decade - for definite this time!

      BTW: Mod parent up.

  17. Mod parent +5 funny pls. by ushering05401 · · Score: 1

    Because others in my situation might need a laugh before the ship sinks.

    Regards.

  18. Re:and 10,000 OSS developers.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure they will, now that it's on /.

  19. Dude! Don't post on /. when you're ... by iknownuttin · · Score: 1

    quitting smoking and have had too much coffee! You're just asking to be modd'ed Troll or Flamebait!

    --
    I prefer Flambe as apposed flamebait.
  20. Too busy suing over "patents" by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Can't spare the legal staff to hold a Professional Developer's Conference without them.

    After all, if someone mentions a "business process" during a panel, have to patent that baby for MSFT quick!

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  21. New mantra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Developers, developers, devel...PSYCHE!

  22. Due to lack of Interest ... by uknowit · · Score: 1

    They should come out and say it, due to lack of interest, we are canceling this gig. Man, so much money and what a waste. These bunch needs new blood!

    1. Re:Due to lack of Interest ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only slashdotters who aren't interested are either purist open-sorcerers or unemployed.

  23. See MIX, TechEd US, TechEd Europe and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    MS has multiple conferences aimed at developers. MIX just recently gave developers a chance to learn about Silverlight. TechEd has hundreds of sessions for developers, and there's a dedicated European version of TechEd in Barcelona. PDC is always focused on showing off future technology (~2 years down the road), and not training on the stuff available today. Given that Vista has only recently shipped, and that the new versions of Server, SQL and VisualStudio aren't shipping til next year, it's not surprising that no one wants to talk about the _next_ versions of those things yet.

  24. Hay! by kitsunewarlock · · Score: 2, Funny

    Developers! Developers! Devel...never mind.

    --
    Ginga no Rekshiya Mata Each page.
  25. Re:and 10,000 OSS developers.... by kryptkpr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I really like NEdit, and so do many of the folks at work. A few holdouts do use Emacs but any appeal it may have is lost on me. The standard GNU Xemacs doesn't even have different open files show up in different tabs. My idea of a good programmers editor left the terminal window behind a long time ago, but emacs seems to still be stuck there.

    --
    DJ kRYPT's Free MP3s!
  26. Bad Timing is Right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft has cancelled its autumn Professional Developers Conference, citing bad timing in light of the launch of important infrastructure and platform products. Microsoft dropped the bombshell about PDC, which was to be held in October in Los Angeles, in a posting on its Microsoft Developer Network (MSDN) site. Leopard!
  27. The three Vista developers couldn't show by BillGatesLoveChild · · Score: 4, Funny

    One said his wife was expecting, and the second was busy porting his game from the DirectX10 (codename 'Titanic') to OpenGL. The last said he was busy trying to get his Vista drivers working. He said all the UAC messages are slowing him down.

    Go Vista! Go straight into a hillside!

  28. First step: admit you have an unhealthy addiction by jmorris42 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    > I agree.

    No. You don't really. You like to bitch and moan once in awhile but you really don't mind taking it up the pooper whenever Microsoft wants to shaft you. Harsh? Yup. Happens to be true though, based on what you are writing.

    Because you have KNOWN exactly what Microsoft is and how your fortunes (and you customer, etc) are tied to Microsoft's whims for years (hell, decades now) and I didn't hear you mention the FIRST step towards an attempt to correct a situation you yourself realize is ultimately going to hurt you.

    Yes you are right, that you and your customers have become ensnared in Microsoft's trap of dependency. And you are at least toying with the first step of admitting you have a dependency problem. Now you need a plan to break the unhealthy addiction. You really needed to start years back to have a leg up on the smart competitors who already figured it out but perhaps it isn't too late for you to save yourself.

    Step one: When you are in a hole that is rapidly filling with water, the first step has to be to stop digging. That means make every effort to avoid adding any new dependencies on Microsoft technologies. That means don't touch Vista or any of any of it's new technologies or APIs. Same for Office 2007.

    Step two: Develop a roadmap that will lead you where you want to be tomorrow, not where Microsoft wants you to go. Many find the easy path to be web based apps, especially in this era of AJAX. Pitch your customers a client neutral web based version of the apps you currently push on them as .net IE/Windows only crap and see if they are receptive. Explore whether your existing stuff can be run under Wine and fix things until it does work. Then plant a bug in your customer's ear that you AREN'T one of those crappy little vertical vendors who only understands Microsoft. and that if they want to escape you won't be one of the vendors holding them back, that you can support other platforms. If everyone is a passive as you and waits for someone else to go first Microsoft wins.

    Step three: start finding and deploying alternatives whenever practical. OO.o instead of Office where it will work, Firefox instead of IE anywhere there isn't a lot of ActiveX BS to snarl things up. Outlook/Outlook Express should be trashed anywhere people aren't already addicted to Exchange stuff. The more of those dependencies you can break, both for yourself and your customers, the easier it will be to open up options down the road. Same for file/print servers. They can make a great first step and let you gain practical experience.

    Step four: Explore and experiment, learning what is out there is half the struggle. Microsoft crams their stuff down your craw, the free stuff is often waiting for you to go looking for it.

    Step five: Don't just look at Linux. Yes a Mac isn't any more RMS pure than Windows and they want the same power Microsoft has, but Microsoft is the threat to independent developers and users today. And a Mac can run Photoshop/etc.

    --
    Democrat delenda est
  29. Re:and 10,000 OSS developers.... by eclectro · · Score: 1

    individual version of a ground-breaking text editor

    They're re-doing notepad???

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  30. Life is filled with stress by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    I had to deal with the stress of Visual BASIC 5.0 and 6.0 and using OLE/DDE to control MS-Word 2000 objects, and when VB closed the Word document, it locked up the Word toolbar. My code did not do that, it was a bug with Office 2000. I removed the close command and the toolbar didn't lock up, but the user had to close the document by themselves. Microsoft was aware of the problem but said that SP1 or SP2 of Office 2000 might fix the problem, and my managers wanted it fixed right away so they could migrate from 97 to 2000. They didn't understand that I didn't have the Word 2000 source code to fix the bug, and that the problem was not with my program, and Microsoft documented that it was a Word 2000 problem.

    Ah well at least Microsoft has an offer to get Visual Studio 2005 Standard for completing two virtual lab surveys, so this time I don't have to buy Visual BASIC 2005 Standard or use the clipped Visual BASIC 2005 Express edition that is free.

    I must say that Microsoft has a lot of free online documentation and eBooks that have helped out as well.

    I am glad I quit in 2002, I heard the .Net migration with Visual Studio 2002 was a bear. I was put on disability, but now I am trying to find a way to return to work.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  31. Re:and 10,000 OSS developers.... by loners · · Score: 1

    Most new developers think lisp is what makes daffy and donald duck talk funny.

  32. Re:and 10,000 OSS developers.... by Money+for+Nothin' · · Score: 1

    Eclipse Eclipse in terms of RAM usage? Is that even possible? Eclipse uses what, like > 100MBytes before even loading a project, doesn't it? LOL...

  33. Your post is excellent by ushering05401 · · Score: 1

    And I have step four covered. I have tried various distros and even rolled my own Gentoo install. Not claiming to be a guru or anything.

    My issue is user adoption. My opinion is the opinion of only one of their providers.

    You are correct on most points, but like many others fail to address one thing. Users want the simplest solution. They are correct in believing that MS is the simplest solution. They don't mind sacrificing security, freedom, and mobility so that they can have something that is monocultural and uniform like Windows.

    Thank you for taking the time to write your post. Maybe it will help.

    Regards.

    1. Re:Your post is excellent by jmorris42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > Users want the simplest solution.

      Of course, so do I.

      > They are correct in believing that MS is the simplest solution.

      They may be believe it but they would be wrong. Odds are as a developer in a vertical industry you are more computer literate than they are, but YOU believe it too so you can't correctly advise them.

      This is 2007, if there is a Windows victim left who hasn't been wiping and reinstalling (or using Ghost) end user machines at least annually I haven't met em. Add in the cost of the 'protection' software that allows one to survive even a year with an end user and it is pretty awful... and expensive. Then add in the other costs of owning and maintaining Windows.

      It isn't the best choice. It is just that most users have never even SEEN anything else and are afraid of the unknown.

      If you are selling into operations too small to even have consultant system admins you probably should have Macs as your ultimate target to be guiding towards. Remember that there are a LOT of options these days to get the odd Windows executable running on a Mac. Have a look at what Code Weavers is doing in this area. Make YOUR stuff able to either run native on either platform or from a small server in their corner.

      If the customer is a little bigger thin clients make sense. Remote in Windows from a server to cover the legacy stuff. But get those Windows desktops scrapped and stop the pain! Crossover Office is also something to experiment with, it runs a LOT of those simple 'industry specific apps' (read VB) and will only get better at it.

      If you haven't experienced a thin client or server hosted homes on a thick client you can't really understand the difference. In my world (with 100 total seats at six sites) a workstation can die and we don't care. We toss the spare out and get on with our work. NO inportant data lives on the clients even though ours still have the OS on a local HDD. Yes you can pull most of this stuff off with Windows clients & servers but by the time you are done you have spent a lot more in time and money to make it actually work correctly and will spend more keeping it running. But until you experience it and truly understand there is a better way than unreliable Dells running unstable Windows you won't be able to explain it to others.

      Whatever the question, Windows is probably the wrong answer. The sole exception is a gamer who wants more than a Playstation/X-Box can offer.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    2. Re:Your post is excellent by W2k · · Score: 1

      This is 2007, if there is a Windows victim left who hasn't been wiping and reinstalling (or using Ghost) end user machines at least annually I haven't met em.

      You had me until this part. This is complete fscking hogwash. Since Windows 2000 (that's what, 7 years back now), regular reinstalls are a thing of the past. I maintain a good number of Windows end-user desktops apart from my own, including some used by complete newbies. I've told them how to avoid spyware and they run a decent anti-virus that is lightweight, includes protection from rootkits and spyware, and costs EUR20/year to keep updated. And the only time they need reinstalling is when some piece of hardware fails. Some have been running off the same XP install for 4+ years and they are rock solid.

      Much of what you've written in this thread I agree with, but please don't resort to outright lies in your efforts to push OSS. It can stand on its own.

      --
      Quality, performance, value; you get only two, and you don't always get to pick.
    3. Re:Your post is excellent by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      In my brief year and a half as a consultant, my mentor basically explained to me that customers don't really know what they want, or rather, they know what they want, but they don't really understand how to get there. The job of anyone in the software consulting business is to provide the roadmap from point A to point B, and in many cases that means knowing more about what the customer needs than the customer wants. It also means protecting the customer from what will ultimately become delerious lock-ins.

      For me in my current job, which was a pure Windows shop, I've been putting more open source software into the mix. There's a Samba server running an NT4-style subdomain because, really, they don't need all of the features (and complexities and quirks) of AD, when all they really want to do is to do some file and print sharing, and I've eliminated the need in at least one department to worry about MS's licensing madness. Microsoft is a master of selling you what you don't want. We're running Exchange right now precisely because everyone wanted Exchange shared calendaring. At some point I hope to move them far away from Outlook/Exchange, and that's part of that slow process of weaning them off of bloated and difficult products. Though I'm no fan of AJAX, I'll be writing some management software in PHP and AJAX and it will be browser neutral. It may be that if I could find a reasonably good groupware replacement at some point that uses the browser, that I may begin pushing that. While I'm in a shop where I doubt anyone has even heard of Linux or open source, I am in a position to at least open their eyes to possibilities, and proactively pursue those technologies that I feel best fit the organization.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  34. Not really indicative of anything: Tech Ed's on by kendor · · Score: 2, Informative
    Not sure this is really news in the way that some might think it. A few reasons:


    PDC is not Microsoft's preeminent developer conference. Tech Ed 200X is. My understanding is that TE is Microsoft's biggest developer conference, and it's running next week, June 4-8 (or 3-8 if you registered for the pre-conference sessions.) Picture 10,0000+ geeks trying hard to make dinner conversation, cavernous convention halls, and (literally) dawn-to-dusk classes and sessions for six days. Quite an experience.

    Conferences get cancelled all the time for all kinds of reasons: I was scheduled to go to Lynda.com's DX3 in Boston, and it got nixed a few weeks out, probably because of competition from FlashForward, MIX, and TechEd. Conferences can get nuked for any of a number of reasons: attendence, competing events, a sense of quiet. I'd rather they schedule developer conferences for when they're warranted, rather than trying to hype up whatever's finished according to a timetable.

    In this case, we're in something of a quiet period: SQL Server 2005 and VS.NET 2005 have been released, ASP.NET 2.0 has been out for awhile, and everyone's waiting for the next big shoes to fall: the growth (or failure) of Silverlight, an ORM-ish technology called LINQ, and the next version of VS.NET, which will fold a lot of web dev/expression stuff into VS.NET. My guess is that "Orcas" will be an extremely significant release for MSFT, in that it will finally turn a wo rld class programming/DB interaction environment into a tool that advanced designers and Dreamweaver users will want to use.

    All of that's a bit off, and so for now, a quiet conference schedule may represent some honesty from Redmond. Personally, among Microsft technologies, I'm currently most excited about some of the third-party stuff coming out. Check out the controls offered by Telerik, or even more gee-whiz cool, the just-released EntitySpaces 2007 ORM framework. Awesome tools. I think Mike & Co. just released this to production yesterday.

    BTW, I will be at Tech Ed if anyone wants to meet over junk food and ice cream. As I have a bit of a background programming Actionscript, I'm interested particularly in seeing what Expression/Silverlight can do.

    1. Re:Not really indicative of anything: Tech Ed's on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Teched is not a *developer* conference. It is an IT professional conference. There's a difference.

    2. Re:Not really indicative of anything: Tech Ed's on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen too much rumbling over the past week to think that Tech Ed is going to be anything more than a particularly blatant take on "here's some really cool stuff for Obsolete Framework 2007". But what do I know? I got off that treadmill 15 years ago.

    3. Re:Not really indicative of anything: Tech Ed's on by denidoom · · Score: 1

      Bingo. IT managers are the "purchasing influencers." Big corps want the quick fix of IT dollars.

      --
      Lane Myer: I have great fear of tools. I once made a birdhouse in woodshop and the fair housing committee condemned it.
  35. Re:and 10,000 OSS developers.... by Nasarius · · Score: 1

    There are a couple of glaring problems with Eclipse, I think. The first is that it's next to impossible to redistribute project files in any meaningful manner, last time I checked. All you get is a mess in your .workspace directory. The second, and most obvious, is that the GUI is based on sluggish Java garbage. Like Azureus, it's just excruciating to use. Which is a shame, because for editing Java code, it's unparalleled.

    Oh, and the One True Editor is Vim, you heathen scum.

    --
    LOAD "SIG",8,1
  36. Re:and 10,000 OSS developers.... by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

    And slowly but steadily, each and every one of those mutates into a full-blown operating system, flooding the open-source world with yet more operating systems that implement almost identical APIs.

  37. Not sure if this matters anyway... by SadGeekHermit · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because my shop is a Windows shop (ugh) I have no choice but to develop on Windows. But we've all agreed to do our in-house Windows development using Java and Oracle tools rather than Microsoft tools. So for us, this is a non-event.

    Consider the benefits of this approach:

    1. We don't have to worry about porting our applications to Vista, because it's Sun's and Oracle's responsibility to make their platforms Vista-compatbile. All we have to do is copy files to a new server. So we can spend our time actually writing code, instead of worrying about porting issues.

    2. In the event we DON'T move to Vista, our stuff will work on Linux, or Mac OS/X, or anything else Oracle and Java run on. It's not likely we'll get a mainframe, but if we did, we'd STILL be able to copy our stuff onto it.

    3. Our skills have a long shelf-life. New versions of Java tend to ADD capabilities, but the language itself doesn't tend to change in ways that require re-writes. Oracle's the same way, mostly.

    Overall, I don't know why anyone still uses Microsoft tools, given the way they like to "churn" their environment. It seems kind of chaotic and random to me. Remember the switch from VB6 to VB.Net, and how people howled about that? Phew...

    --
    NO CARRIER
    1. Re:Not sure if this matters anyway... by weicco · · Score: 1

      Remember the switch from VB6 to VB.Net

      Exactly what switch are you talking about? Do you mean that all the sudden VB6 compilers or runtimes stopped working when VB.NET came out?

      I work in a team that uses solely MS products. I haven't heard any "howling" when VB.NET came out. In fact I was writing VB6, VB.NET and C# code at the same time in different projects about a year ago. VB6 project which I was on was started on 1993 and it is still used and developed. Some of the oldest codes were rewritten in 1995 I think. Because of some stupid decisions it propably wont work in Vista but it shouldn't be too much of an hassle to fix those issues. I'd like to see Java project started 1993 which is still under active use and development.

      Also I would like to see Java project where you can just copy everything to new server and "it just works." There's couple of hardcore Java coders sitting right in front of me who are constantly whining about how different Java versions on different Linux servers is causing some weird issues with their code. I don't know what they are doing and I really don't care. My apps works nicely on different Windows servers. All I have to do is change DB parameters in web.config when moving to new environment.

      And don't get me started about Oracle. It works and I can live with it but I've watched people trying to configure it for hours to get it into somewhat working state. I admit that I haven't done any really low-level configuring on SQL Server 2000/2005 but on the other hand, I haven't had to.

      --
      You don't know what you don't know.
    2. Re:Not sure if this matters anyway... by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      "Port to Vista"? What exactly would your app do that makes it incompatible with Vista if it was written natively?

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    3. Re:Not sure if this matters anyway... by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      "Port to Vista"? What exactly would your app do that makes it incompatible with Vista if it was written natively?
      A old program I wrote in Delphi 6 which is used for automating a few financial calculations doesn't work on Vista, it works with all other win32 platforms.

      It crashes on start complaining about non-integers being in integers. I didn't use anything beyond the default components that came with Delphi and most of the code was just todo with mathematical calculations.

      So to answer your question... I don't think it's anything in the app that makes it incompatible, I think it's things messed up in Vista.
      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    4. Re:Not sure if this matters anyway... by mythz · · Score: 1

      I also used to be a Java developer but have switched over to c# as well solely for productivity gains. As of VS.NET 2005 I know of no language feature that Java has over C#. Unfortunately I found Java to be to strict and acedemic and it relies on an array of patterns, frameworks and configuration files that are needed to overcome shortcomings in the language itself.

      Conventions like Beans, ActionListeners, etc are needed because Java lacks language features like Properties, Indexers and Events. Other noteable productive features c# has over java include:
        - Iterators (Continuations, i.e. use of the yield keyword)
        - Partial classes
        - Nullable Types
        - Anonymous Methods

      And with C# 3.0 you now get:
        - Type Inference
        - Lambda expressions
        - Extension Methods
        - Anonymous Types/Delegates
        - Type/Collection initializers
        - LINQ

      There appears to be a philosophy difference between the languages, I just personally find C# to be more productive.

    5. Re:Not sure if this matters anyway... by SadGeekHermit · · Score: 1

      Native code that works in older versions of Windows doesn't always work in Vista. Someone else mentioned Delphi apps, which I was going to mention (he beat me to it). I'm currently rewriting a Delphi app in Java for this exact reason.

      --
      NO CARRIER
    6. Re:Not sure if this matters anyway... by SadGeekHermit · · Score: 1

      Hold on. You have just made several obvious errors.

      First of all, who said frameworks are designed to "overcome shortcomings"? They're designed to increase productivity. They get most of the plumbing out of the way so you can get started on the interesting parts. Your precious Microsoft .Net IS A FRAMEWORK that exists for this exact reason. Java's frameworks aren't dumbed down for you; Microsoft's are. Java is harder; we get paid more. This is by design.

      Second, All a Javabean is is a class that follows certain conventions, including providing get and set methods (PROPERTIES). You can put those in any class you want. Why do you think Java doesn't have them? Maybe you didn't know how to use them.

      And how could you miss the fact that Java DOES have iterators:
      http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/java/util/ Iterator.html

      And what's up with your nutty point about events and AddActionListener??? Google "AddActionListener" sometime and READ IT, by the way -- all it does is give you an easy way to set up a method that handles an event (the SAME THING you do in C# when you create an event handling function, they just call it something else).

      I'm not going to go through your laundry list of syntactic sugar, but I will say it's mostly unnecessary. If it turns you on, good for you, but don't preach about it making C# better than Java, because that's a bogus argument. Java has many things that C# does NOT have, which in my view are a bit more significant, like the ability to run (patent UNENCUMBERED) on Linux, the ability to run on Mac OS/X, the fact that it's GPL now, so no company can force its will on the community...

      I understand that C# is your new girlfriend and if you don't talk bad about your old girlfriend you won't feel like you're giving the new girl 100%, but please, at least bring up valid points.

      --
      NO CARRIER
    7. Re:Not sure if this matters anyway... by SadGeekHermit · · Score: 1

      Sigh...

      When Microsoft switched from VB6 to VB.Net, I happened to be working in a government agency with a lot of old timers who only knew VB6. They found the whole thing QUITE painful. And there were a number of grassroots movements to complain to Microsoft about the changes.

      For instance, Microsoft claimed that there was an easy converter for VB6 code to turn it into VB.Net, but what this actually did was comment out much of the code and pronounce the file "converted". Very cute, but not quite what people had in mind.

      The core problem was that VB6 was not object oriented, and VB.Net WAS. It simply wasn't possible to directly convert any non-trivial project from one to the other without a complete rewrite. And don't give me any shit about VB6 being object oriented because they call dynamic link libraries "objects" -- all they REALLY are are old-school function libraries. Crap, really.

      Also VB6 skills are not portable to VB.Net, and this pissed people off to no end.

      Maybe you're blessed with staff that don't mind changing their skill set every year or two when Microsoft senses a change in wind direction. Good for you! But take the blinders off, you're gonna walk off a cliff like that.

      Finally, if your java coders aren't good enough to write portable code, fire 'em and get some new ones. Seriously.

      --
      NO CARRIER
  38. So, to sum up... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

    "Developers! Developers! Develop--oops, sorry, we've got some big launches coming up. You guys will have to come back later."

    Chris Mattern

  39. Re:and 10,000 OSS developers.... by The_Sledge · · Score: 1

    Oh, they do notice, it's just that they really don't care.

    Thing is, if MS treat their developers with this type of contempt, imagine how lowly their users would rate?

    "End users, who needs them? We know they will not have a choice sooner or later, and if they do, we'll kill whoever is opposing us... or at least try to"

    --
    HEX offender mugshot ID: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  40. Cue the video by real+gumby · · Score: 1

    of steve balmer lurking, hunched over, and furtively whispering, "developers.....developers....developers...develop ers..."

    (OK, joking aside, though I rather dislike Ballmer, that was a really great video of a truly great attitude for him to have had and it's really unfair that gets slagged for it. It's especially unfair that he gets slagged for it on /., where so many of us are programmers. I hope he's ticked off about canceling the PDC, whatever the reason. And maybe I go to heck for making that joke).

  41. Disrupt by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    I depend on this shit. Why? Because you formed a friggin monopoly and all of my potential customers use your products.

    Sounds like your market is ripe for a disruptive technology.

    Do something on linux that's far-and-away better than what exists today - do it in AJAX - and they will come.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  42. Re:and 10,000 OSS developers.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah, because oss development cannot be done with ms dev tools? my guess is that you're completely out of touch with the development community let alone being a developer yourself.
     
    but this is a pretty common among people who simply can not resist bring up oss in every conversation: they know the term even though they have nothing to do with actual software development.
     
    without being a developer yourself the only thing that oss has to offer to a user is the fact that it's free. fan-fucking-tastic.
     
    another jab from the oss community. do yourself a favor; let the devs talk and just shut your stupid fucking hole.

  43. "...citing bad timing..." by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 1
    ...in light of the launch of important infrastructure and platform products.

    Yep, Leopard and the iPhone. ;-)

  44. A fanatic troll by Pipelino · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    My god, you really are a fanatic OSS troll, I can't believe they moded you "Insightful" (are you Richard Stallman ? That would explain everything). I can't believe that you believe half the stuff that you just wrote, and I can't believe that you claim it as if all non-believers are just plain stupid. I mean, you sound like a teenager that just spent the last few months in a taliban camp, seriously - maybe you forgot to write "die Micro$oft, die slowly and in pain"... pretty rude post.

    1. Re:A fanatic troll by jmorris42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > My god, you really are a fanatic OSS troll,

      Guess you missed the part where I recommended Macs in certain scenarios. Longterm, yea I'm a Free Software believer. But mostly I think Windows is a menace and a disaster. Other than gamers I really don't know of a question where Windows is a good answer.

      But more importantly Microsoft is fast becoming a threat to the entire idea of 'personal computers.' I'm becoming convinced they intend, and have a fair chance of attaining, nothing less than the elimination of the general purpose computer, replacing it with something more akin to an X-Box that runs IE and Office. If we can't gain enough control to offer credible competition before they manange to buy a law requiring all unregulated hardware to enforce code signing and DRM we all lose bigtime. On that day all small independent software houses are going to be hosed.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    2. Re:A fanatic troll by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      I don't think one needs to be anti-Microsoft, so much as one should be doing their job and protecting their customers from unnecessary lock-ins. Quite frankly, I'd be quite happy to run Windows workstations with *nix servers doing the file sharing. I think the greatest evil that Microsoft has done is marketing themselves as the only truly useable and useful solution to every problem. Whether it's video games, workstations or servers, the Microsoft marketing machine is all about propagating this idea. In reality, solutions should not be based on the most popular vendor, but rather on what an organization needs. If all they do is some basic wordprocessing and spreadsheets, then I don't necessarily see it as necessary to advocate a complete abandonment of the Windows platform, but merely moving them to OpenOffice, thus saving the organization money in licensing fees. Windows may very well still be the best workstation platform, and I certainly don't want to upset the balance by advocating a radical shift that could create a lot of problems that will ultimately come down on me.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    3. Re:A fanatic troll by triso · · Score: 1

      ...Other than gamers I really don't know of a question where Windows is a good answer.... Even this is not true. Microsoft is attempting to force all gamers and game companies to upgrade to vista by making directX 10 only for vista and not for XP.
  45. WWDC Timing by vlad30 · · Score: 1

    Apples worldwide Developer Conference is on June 11-15. It would be embarrassing for MS if more developers showed up at SJ's event than SB's beside they need a few more days for there secret new OS features to be copied ^H^H^H^H^Hentered into powerpoint

    --
    Your'e all thinking it, I just said it for you
    1. Re:WWDC Timing by vlad30 · · Score: 1

      Note to self Don't read Slashdot while on the phone while at work and making a coffee and listening to anoying user, GP was being funny, must kill that annoying user at least

      --
      Your'e all thinking it, I just said it for you
    2. Re:WWDC Timing by Divebus · · Score: 1

      I knew there was a reason. You saved me from explaining the joke, at least.

      --

      Most of the stuff on /. won't survive first contact with facts.
  46. Too much microsoft... by CompMD · · Score: 1

    I've been around too many broken windows servers when I see "PDC" and think "primary domain controller."

  47. Microsoft and developer support by MosesJones · · Score: 1

    But do Microsoft really support their developers that well these days? I mean compare VS2005 (note the year folks) with what is coming out of eclipse (let alone the commercial extensions to eclipse) and its hard to justify the claim that VS is the "best" developer IDE, its just that VS folks haven't used the alternatives whereas the Java folks can switch like the wind. So IDE wise they aren't supporting their developers. Even things like the testing framework are an issue, most people use the open source JUnit or NUnit but MS couldn't stand that so created their own, bulkier and worse, alternative, again not great for developers.

    So what about features? Well if you do enterprise software they haven't had a major revision of the set since 2004(!) and even on the desktop with things like Office the amount of porting information from old to ribbon isn't as great as you'd expect (its more this is how you BUILD stuff with ribbon).

    There is MDSN which is great for software access (and you pay for it) and some of the forums are pretty good. The problem with MS is that the community is so MS centric, what I mean by this is that when you compare with Java you aren't asking whether Sun support Java people better than MS but whether SAP, Oracle, IBM, BEA, Sun, Open Source, etc support Java people better.

    I've regularly sat on both sides of the fence, and I think that competition between vendors tends to give developers better support.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:Microsoft and developer support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried Eclipse, it looks very polished and intuitive. Unfortunately, it is just a little bit slower than VS. We are talking millisecond level responsiveness in the code completion popup, etc. Not enough to hinder getting work done, but enough to tell me that someone chose a tool (Java) to make their development experience easier at the expense of me having a the best, most response IDE experience possible (like it was in VS 6.0 in 1998).

      What saddens me, though, is that eventually MS will probably copy the "good enough" philosophy of Eclipse (Java), and rewrite the IDE (yet again) in managed code (which is supposedly a feature), and it will just be an Eclipse clone. So maybe I should just switch to Eclipse... sigh...

  48. Post-Vista Fatigue by Knackered · · Score: 1

    I'm not that surprised. If WinHEC (the Windows Hardware Engineering Conference) was anything to go by, Microsoft have post-coital fatigue after the (premature?) release of Vista, and have very little to say. The main keynote at WinHEC was totally uninspiring, there are a couple of neat things happening with Windows Server, but the rest of the conference was zero content. Attendance seemed low to me, compared to the one PDC and three or four other WinHECs I've been to.

    --
    a.
  49. Speaking as a native-windows dev... by Toreo+asesino · · Score: 1

    I love the idea of Java, but the implementation poor. I used to be a Java dev, but I've fully converted to the dark side since, essentially because I found Java's implementation just impractical. Things like VM versions (Java has countless varying versions (of which any number can be installed in varying locations), .Net has 4 - of which only 2 are particularly significant imo - 1.1 + 2.0), designing forms (I found a plug-in for Eclipse once that made it ever-so-slightly faster than coding it manually), and frankly, the god-awful speed of the it running....all made Java just a bit of a pipe dream rather than a practical reality.

    I know what you mean about .Net cross-platform portability (which is a bummer), but Java just doesn't cut the mustard for applications for these reasons, plus others.

    --
    throw new NoSignatureException();
    1. Re:Speaking as a native-windows dev... by SadGeekHermit · · Score: 1

      Most of your post is based on out of date information. As a result, each of your points is a "straw man" argument.

      First, the VM issue. If you're doing Java, you're usually doing server-side code and your VM is under your control. The user interface is a browser, but the Java's running server-side so you have no compatability issues. If you're writing a Java application, all you have to do is make sure your users upgrade to the most current VM available, and provide a copy of the installer on your install disk (this is what EVERYBODY does). You're thinking way, way too far in the past. It's a straw man.

      Second, designing forms is just as easy in Java as it is in C# -- IF YOU USE NETBEANS. Or JDeveloper. It's drag and drop, works just like Microsoft's tools. Another straw man. Nobody said you HAVE to use Eclipse, so don't. I can't stand it, personally.

      And third, modern Java comes complete with a JIT compiler so the code is running at native code speeds. It's optimized, compiled to native code, and cached. It ONLY runs slowly the very first time you fire it up; after that it runs like a C++ application. That's three straw men in a row!

      I don't think you're FUD'ing, I think you used Java "way back when" got turned off and never came back. Why not take another look? Things are Quite Nice Now.

      --
      NO CARRIER
  50. Microsoft Cancels Major Developers' Conference by Hope+M. · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Maybe Microsoft has canceled this for obvious reasons of the kind of product priorities that they are about to undertake. It just states that Microsoft does care more about its new softwares and product hostings... let's discuss more of this, you can reach me at: http://forum.affiliatebot.com/register.php

    1. Re: Microsoft Cancels Major Developers' Conference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go away spammer.

  51. New company strategy! by FredDC · · Score: 1

    This all fits in perfectly with Microsoft's new company strategy, getting rid of them annoying developers and start hiring more lawyers! Why bother making better products than your competitors, if you can just sue them out of existence?

    --
    09 f9 11 02 9d 74 e3 5b d8 41 56 c5 63
  52. Sure Mr. JMorris is right, Dell, HP, etc are wrong by xtracto · · Score: 1

    Whatever the question, Windows is probably the wrong answer. The sole exception is a gamer who wants more than a Playstation/X-Box can offer.

    Holly fuck, surely that is why Dell, HP, Gateway, Lanix, PC-World, Best Buy and even the guy in the corner PC shop keep offering Windows XP/Windows Vista machines... and not only that *drumrolls*.... people keep buying it...

    If you haven't experienced a thin client or server hosted homes on a thick client you can't really understand the difference. In my world (with 100 total seats at six sites) a workstation can die and we don't care. We toss the spare out and get on with our work. NO inportant data lives on the clients even though ours still have the OS on a local HDD. .

    In my University they have every document saved in RAID storage which is backed up every night. It is as possible and trivial to configure Windows and Linux to do it, it is also equally possible to make raw disk writing to replace hard disks... most people here use Windows XP, I use Fedora Core and it is equally easy.

    But until you experience it and truly understand there is a better way than unreliable Dells running unstable Windows you won't be able to explain it to others..

    Unreliable Dells?, Unstable Windows?, come on this is bullshit and you know it. What version of Windows are you using? ME? 98? The cliche that Windows is unstable is in the same level than the cliche that Linux is "not ready for the desktop". Linux zealots hate the later, but they keep trying to believe the former... its plain FUD.

    To conclude answering your trollish rant, the Microsoft Windows OS family is aimed to certain population (90% of the whole population by the statistics), CentOS is aimed to other population and Ubuntu to yet another. As I have read again and again in here when someone wants to make kids like you enter in reason, when you grow up, you will understand that these operating systems are just *tools*, each one of those are useful for certain different tasks. Until then, you can get all sentimental with your sets of 0's and 1's which is what Windows and Linux are...

    The rest of us? we just use what is needed for the work.

    --
    Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
  53. Re:and 10,000 OSS developers.... by dkf · · Score: 1

    My experiences with eclipse have largely painful.
    That's a shame, since it does make quite a big difference when programming in Java (speaking as an old hand at emacs). The big gain I found was from three things:
    1. It's management of your package imports
    2. It's language-aware searching (especially when combined with good doc comments)
    3. It's refactoring (good way to clean up inconsistently-named methods and classes)

    It's also pretty nice for people working with XML Schema or WSDL, so much so that it makes it just about possible to work with those formats...
    --
    "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
  54. Does NEdit help you to: by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

    Compile, debug, pack, play chess, translate morse code?

    I guess not.

  55. Re:First step: admit you have an unhealthy addicti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Because you have KNOWN exactly what Microsoft is and how your fortunes
    >(and you customer, etc) are tied to Microsoft's whims for years (hell,
    >decades now) and I didn't hear you mention the FIRST step towards an
    >attempt to correct a situation you yourself realize is ultimately going
    >to hurt you.

    Shit, ask him if he lives in the U.S. We've been getting our game on in THAT department for decades. Somebody pass the gas, please...

  56. Re:First step: admit you have an unhealthy addicti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The market adoption takes years. Discovering the early fertile markets is tough. As you say, Gates missed "The Internet" and now has lost ground. Too many apps run on "The Internet" and do not require Windows or Office. Bad news for Softie.

          No need to have a PDC when most all non-cuffed developers have moved on to Linux or Java. The jobs are writing enterprise apps or building new devices. Unfortunately for Softie these no longer require Windows either. The irony is many developers sneak in CygWin or even their favorite distro for their job. The "old guard" still love the Windows and Office but the younger folks are using what works best. For development, that is with zero doubt Linux (and Eclipse unless you're hard-core slinging code and then vim and friends). I think OO Draw is one clear example of FOSS being simply better.

        Did anyone on /. even plan to go to the PDC anyways? I went to one in 1995 I think it was. Fun times. But mostly a promo event. I began to detest the Microsoft Marketing Machine soon thereafter when they sent out my latest DevNet with their web stuff and the examples didn't work. I compared it to the Java applet book I'd grabbed at a store and that had very cool examples which actually worked. I still labored in the Softie space for a few more years but finally escaped to freedom. My history with Softie technologies is they promote something but never use it themselves (e.g. "write your apps in OLE" when their's never fully supported it. What about their cross-network app sharing thing? Etc ad infinitum.) and impasses (feature X is broekn. No way to fix it or work around it. Want to do Y with SMS, nope SMS doesn't do that.)

            Each JUG and LUG I attend here in RTP is every time more technical than any PDC session I attended. You actually learn something and can even ask tough questions!

  57. Re:Don't forget... by bugg_tb · · Score: 0

    Most of the parent is bollocks, but it should be marked up purely for associating MS with cock-smoking teabaggers.