Slashdot Mirror


Uwe Boll Has Three Picture Distribution Deal

1up is reporting that famed, beloved film-maker Uwe Boll has landed a three-picture deal with a company called FreeStyle. They're going to be releasing three Boll-helmed films to theatres across the country. The three films are Postal, Dungeon Siege, and an original work by the director called Seed. "The high-profile cast of In the Name of the King: A Dungeon Siege Tale -- Jason Statham, Ray Liotta, Ron Perlman, Leelee Sobieski, John Rhys-Davies, Matthew Lillard and Burt Reynolds -- means Freestyle's putting their muscle behind the fantasy epic. Opening January 18, 2008, the film's scheduled to appear in at least 2,500 screens -- a nice score for Boll, considering BloodRayne's distribution problems."

51 of 63 comments (clear)

  1. Three full length movies?! by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Funny

    I saw the headline that said "three pictures" as in still images and thought to myself "Yeah, that's about the right length for a Uwe Boll film".

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
    1. Re:Three full length movies?! by RingDev · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oddly enough, last I heard his Dungeon Seige movie was like 4 1/2 hours and was getting split into 2 releases (thanks giving/x-mas).

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  2. Pavlovian Reaction by Puff+of+Logic · · Score: 4, Funny

    Am I the only one who involuntarily flinches whenever news comes out about movies based on games? I swear, it's an actual physical reaction to mental trauma!

    --
    P.P.S. I'm doing Science and I'm still alive.
    1. Re:Pavlovian Reaction by Spazntwich · · Score: 1

      Far from it. It's a wonder the man has enough self-respect... or lack of shame to continue making films.

      He's a disgrace to the notion of art, and humanity.

    2. Re:Pavlovian Reaction by Ngarrang · · Score: 1

      Leelee Sobieski...

      That was all I needed to read. I would watch her reading the phone book.

      --
      Bearded Dragon
    3. Re:Pavlovian Reaction by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      She is indeed most attractive. Of course, I would also say similar things about Kristanna Loken, and watching Blood Rayne was a traumatic experience...

      Heck, even House of the Dead would have been a decent cheesy B horror movie if he hadn't insisted on putting those stupid scenes from the game in the movie...

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
  3. Favors? by frooddude · · Score: 2

    How many times does Uwe Boll go down for a deal like this? Silver tongue? Hypnosis? Pact with Satan?

  4. Distribution? by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 2, Funny

    "considering Bloodrayne's distribution problems"??? You're joking right? The problem was that Bloodrayne was distributed at all! *shudder* And once again he's trying to hide his pathetic movie making "skills" with some high-profile name. Hey, if Ben Kingsley and that honey Kristianna Lokken couldn't save Bloodrayne I'm not sure how he thinks that doing it again will someone work. Apparently, this company that's giving him these three films has not heard of the phrase about learning from history.

    Ooh. I'd better be careful lest Boll challenge me to a boxing match. Unfortunately, he's a better boxer than filmmaker. Then again, he probably does everything better than filmmaking. :P

    --
    The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
  5. Problems by Bugs42 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Opening January 18, 2008, the film's scheduled to appear in at least 2,500 screens -- a nice score for Boll, considering BloodRayne's distribution problems. Silly me, and here I was thinking that BloodRayne's failure was due to it being a crap movie.
    --
    Programmer: an ingenious device that converts caffeine into code.
  6. Not him, them! by dazedNconfuzed · · Score: 1

    I can see Uwe making more films.
    What flabergasts me is that major actors are still voluntarily acting in them.

    --
    Can we get a "-1 Wrong" moderation option?
    1. Re:Not him, them! by frosty_tsm · · Score: 3, Funny

      John Rhys-Davies just wants to be a dwarf again.

    2. Re:Not him, them! by Spazntwich · · Score: 1

      Hollywood has always functioned on its own rules of what could be loosely referred to as "logic," but you're right: The actions of movie studios, actors, and Uwe himself all serve to confuse the everloving crap out of me.

    3. Re:Not him, them! by notreallyunique · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What flabergasts me is why studios still like him. House of the Dead (2003) Budget: $7MM; Domestic gross: $10MM Alone in the Dark (2005) Budget: $20MM; Domestic gross: $5.13MM Bloodrayne (2005) Budget: $25MM; Domestic gross: $1.55MM In all 3 cases I couldn't find any significant foreign box office numbers (might have missed those somehow though). Ignoring film quality, I could understand studios taking a risk and giving him more small films to take a crack at. The risk/reward is probably pretty good given how healthy the gaming market is. I don't understand why they're taking an even bigger bet on him though.

    4. Re:Not him, them! by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's all about tax write-offs.

    5. Re:Not him, them! by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      What flabergasts me is why studios still like him. Either he has some very incriminating photos of studio execs or he just gives good head.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    6. Re:Not him, them! by blincoln · · Score: 1

      It's all about tax write-offs.

      My understanding is that it used to be, but the loophole he operated under was closed. So in this case I assume he suckered the new distributor into believing they will actually manage to turn a profit?

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    7. Re:Not him, them! by khallow · · Score: 1

      Uwe Boll still in business means that there's at least one more loophole out there.

    8. Re:Not him, them! by tibike77 · · Score: 1

      They sold relatively well on DVD and other non-cinema media.
      They more than made back their budged, every last one of them.
      Sadly.

      --
      By reading this signature you agree to not disagree with the post you just read.
    9. Re:Not him, them! by montyzooooma · · Score: 1

      To be honest, I thought Bloodrayne was okay for a low budget movie. Haven't seen the rest and have no intention, I'm just a sucker for vampires...

    10. Re:Not him, them! by Phoenix00017 · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure those domestic gross numbers are purely box office numbers (and Bloodrayne was $2.4MM, not $1.55MM (which was opening weekend), but that's just nitpicky). It's very possible, though I haven't found numbers to support the theory, that the DVD sales/rentals can add significantly to these figures. Does anyone know if generally how box office revenue compares to DVD revenue, specifically from the studio's perspective?

      However, beyond financials, you're right - why would a studio want to associate themselves with such utter crap? All three of the movies you identified are listed in IMDB's worst 100 movies of all time, with House of the Dead claiming the worst of the 3 at the #20 worst movie ever. That's quite a track record.

  7. Sweet Finally by Sciros · · Score: 3, Funny

    Uwe Boll is my favorite movie director and producer, and fight choreographer of all time. He should make a movie a week because I would watch them all! Bloodrayne was one of the best movies ever because of Kristanna's amazing breasts and Billy Zane's pimp toupee that looked like he kept it in a pocket right up until the camera started rolling in every scene and hastily kinda just slapped it on, barely checking if it was even right-side-up.

    Forget Peter Jackson and Halo. Uwe Boll is the only man for that job. And for Zelda as well. I can't wait for his awesome Oscar-sweeping epic Dungeon Siege movie; I assume Burt Reynolds plays the donkey.

    --
    I like basketball!!1!
    1. Re:Sweet Finally by PixelScuba · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, that role is being played by John Leguizamo.

  8. Finally! by brainlessbob · · Score: 2, Funny

    His movies gets the attention they deserves and I hope it atleast ends the overall negative publicity his movies gets. They may not be masterpieces but they definently are alot better than what many says.

    1. Re:Finally! by DurendalMac · · Score: 1

      No, they are not a lot better. They are festering warts and cancerous polyps on the rectum of filmmaking. Boll has absolutely no talent and churns out some of the worst garbage Hollywood has ever seen. Here's hoping this is Boll's last gasp. These three films are going to tank, FreeStyle will abandon him, and then hopefully no one will ever fund his films again.

  9. Big name actors by MontyApollo · · Score: 1

    "The high-profile cast of In the Name of the King: A Dungeon Siege Tale -- Jason Statham, Ray Liotta, Ron Perlman, Leelee Sobieski, John Rhys-Davies, Matthew Lillard and Burt Reynolds

    The big name actors made Bloodrayne seem even worse to me - I kept thinking what the fuck are you doing in this crappy movie?

    And what are you even doing in this type of movie? I'm looking at you Michael Madsen. And you Michelle Rodriguez.

    And the material they had to work with made them look like really lousy actors. What a disaster.

  10. Mandatory Penny Arcade Link by JMZero · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    Let's not stir that bag of worms...
  11. Oversaturated by Shky · · Score: 1

    This is good, people! If Uwe floods the market with his crappy films, perhaps poorly acted, written, and directed films will fall out of favour! People will go to the cinema and think: "Wow, looks like they totally Uwe'd this movie, let's check out something else."

    So don't worry everybody, we can count on the market and people's good sense and intelligence to fix the problem.

    Right...?

    --
    CC Licensed Serialized Story and Podcast: Ingenioustries
    1. Re:Oversaturated by suv4x4 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      People will go to the cinema and think: "Wow, looks like they totally Uwe'd this movie, let's check out something else."

      It's not how it works. You see, some movies are so bad, I mean SO BAD, that they're good. The canonical example is "Plan 9 from outer space" (you gotta check this out).

      If you thought Plan 9 is funny, then you will love Uwe's "Alone in the Dark" quite a bit more. The movie is so hilarious, that if they marketed it as a parody, I'd never suspect anything else.

      The script, acting, editing, effects: everything is going to crack you up. And this is why, I like Uwe's movies and watch them. Especially good if you go watch it with some friends.

  12. Burt Reynolds? by kidcharles · · Score: 1

    Burt Reynolds in a medieval fantasy movie? Here's some working titles:

    Smokey and the Rogue
    The Longest Furlong
    The Best Little Whorehouse in Middle Earth
    Cannonball Run

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une sig.
    1. Re:Burt Reynolds? by DJNephilim · · Score: 1

      You forgot: Boogie Knights

      --
      Enemy of the Sun
  13. Does It REALLY Matter? by morari · · Score: 1

    Uwe Boll, video game based films, etc... Does it really make a difference when almost all big name films coming out are complete and utter shit anyway?

    --
    "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
  14. License to kill movies by Dewser · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think I just threw up in my mouth a little.

    Why hasn't someone taken this man's movie making license away!!!??? And what frickin suckers would give this guy money to make movies in the first place?????

    The best scene in Bloodrayne was Meatloaf's naked vamp chick harem, then you he actually had to throw meatloaf in that scene which took it down a bunch of notches.

    I saw a brief story a while back on Postal and thought to myself, um, like the game REALLY didn't have much of a story line. It was pretty much "I've lost it, oo a gun! BANG BANG BANG!!!! I regret nothing" and blows off his head. How in the world could you figure that would make a good 1:30 movie?

    Damn it Jack Thompson use your ignorance to do some good and stop Uwe Bolle from making movies!

    --
    Dewser - all around techy "In the immortal words of Socrates - 'I drank what?'"
    1. Re:License to kill movies by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Why hasn't someone taken this man's movie making license away!!!???

      Because of a pesky law known as the first amendment. If there ever was a reason to abolish it it's this guy.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    2. Re:License to kill movies by Ecuador · · Score: 1

      If this is accurate: http://www.cinemablend.com/features/Uwe-Boll-Money -For-Nothing-209.html, then you have your answer.

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    3. Re:License to kill movies by qweqwe321 · · Score: 1

      The way the German tax laws are written, Boll's backers get a big tax write-off for investing in his movies, regardless of whether they're any good. Thus, it's a win-win: the investors get a big tax reduction and Boll has a job.

    4. Re:License to kill movies by mink · · Score: 1

      Postal 2 has some bit of storyline.
      Get your paycheck, go get some milk from the mini mart, return some library books, mundale life kind of stuff.

      Dont remember a lot of the rest. Like why I ended up in a gimp suit, or the reason I had a sniper rifle. I do thank the thugs who were hunting me for managing to line up, because in that game the sniper rifle will actually penetrate through at least 3 people. They went down in one shot.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  15. Ugh by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    That man takes to the movie camera like Jason Vorhees and hockey masks.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  16. Postal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You know, I have to admit I can't think of anyone more appropriate to make a movie out of that.

  17. Bloodrayne? What about HotD? by BobMcD · · Score: 1

    I can't believe we've all already forgiven him for House of the Dead (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0317676/). Bloodrayne was bad? How's about a movie where if you're on the boat, it rains, but if you fall in the water it stops. Pan back to the boat, more rain...

  18. Opening January 18, 2008 by DrXym · · Score: 1

    And closing Opening January 19, 2008. Seriously "Dungeon Siege" will have been sitting in the can for two years. Distributors are not stupid, if it was even slightly watchable it would have appeared before now.

  19. Apocalypse now? by mr-mafoo · · Score: 1

    Yet another sign of the imminent apocalypse, Uwe Boll gets a 3 movie deal.

  20. I really thought by Trails · · Score: 1

    that dungeon siege had already been finished, released and bombed. I really need to cut down on my spice consumption, prescience is too trippy.

  21. What I really want to know is by Z0mb1eman · · Score: 1, Funny

    How do you pronounce "Uwe Boll"? The closest I can come to is "you bowl", which doesn't sound like a name.

    You know, so I can tell people to avoid his movies.

    --
    ClutterMe.com - easiest site creation on the Net. Just click and type.
    1. Re:What I really want to know is by k_187 · · Score: 1

      its eww-vuh bol

      --
      11 was a racehorse
      12 was 12
      1111 Race
      12112
    2. Re:What I really want to know is by Achoi77 · · Score: 1

      ooh-veh bowl

    3. Re:What I really want to know is by Ray+Radlein · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Eeeew! Blows!"

  22. Re:Buddah help us!!! by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

    In the time it took you to think up that post, David Banh got a masters degree in religion.

    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  23. January Opening? by 8tim8 · · Score: 1

    FYI January is the traditional dumping ground for studios. Films that studios believe will be big open in November-December to cash in on the holiday crowds. Smaller films that don't have mass appeal, but appeal more towards the "arthouse" crowds, open in late December in order to be in contention for Oscar consideration, then they are (hopefully) released big in February to March with ad campaigns trumpeting their Oscar nominations. Films that are neither arty nor will be popular open in January.

    Congratulations Uwe!

  24. "Uwe Boll and the German Tax Code" (Escapist) by Allen+Varney · · Score: 3, Informative

    For the second time in two days, I get to plug one of my Escapist articles: "Uwe Boll and the German Tax Code," which answers the perennial question "Why do people keep giving Boll money to make movies?" (Link goes to HTML text version.)

  25. there is no God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    the existence of Uwe Boll proves that there is no God!

    1. Re:there is no God! by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      I feel the exact opposite way, given his ahem track record, there must be SOME supernatural intervention. I think Uwe Boll proves that God exists and he enjoys playing really dumb practical jokes on humans.