Slashdot Mirror


Indian Nationalists Forcibly Censor Orkut

starkravingmad writes "The Economic Times is running a story on Hindu nationalists in India threatening to wreck internet cafes that don't block parts of Orkut that the vigilantes find offensive. From the article: '"Orkut is used by many destructive elements to spread canards about India, Hindus, our gods and cultural heritage," said Abhijit Phanse, president of Bharatiya Vidyarthi Sena, the student group. "We are gently telling Internet cafe owners that it is their responsibility to see that surfers do not use their facility to carry out such hate campaigns ... Or else, we will have to do that job for them." Last week, dozens of Shiv Sena workers vandalised some Internet centres, saying they were not stopping their customers from accessing Orkut groups involved in sending hate messages.'"

23 of 360 comments (clear)

  1. why bother? by ILuvRamen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why do these censoring countries and the groups in them even bother? They're just going to be twice as pissed when 13 year olds find ways around it lol. The harder you try and block it, the harder people will try to unblock it and then you look like the bad guy for trying to block it.

    --
    Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
    1. Re:why bother? by ResidntGeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Do you honestly think these people care more about looking good than about doing the will of their gods?

      --
      ResidntGeek
    2. Re:why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This has got absolutely nothing to do with religion.

      This is just another vote bank tactic to gain the votes of the poor and middle-class by using these "campaigns".

      The internet penetration is so low that nobody in India really cares about Orkut or any other site for that matter. This just a show to the larger middle-class population that they are taking steps to "preserve the culture".

  2. Are you *kidding* me? by metlin · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Shiv Sena? RSS? Those guys are a bunch of nutjobs.

    These are the same who vandalize flower shops on Valentine's Day and threaten couples if they are seen doing anything they consider "obscene" in public.

    Personally, I think that these guys need to have a good drink and need to get laid a little.

    Orkut is used by many destructive elements to spread canards about India, Hindus, our gods and cultural heritage
    I thought it was all about tolerance and forgiveness and all those good things? Pursuit of truth and enlightenment? No? I guess it doesn't quite have the same ring as terrorizing innocent people and flauting your ideologies about.

    Jerks.
    1. Re:Are you *kidding* me? by Omkar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You've pretty much got it. The Shiv Sena and RSS are Hindu chauvinist thugs that aren't taken seriously by anyone educated. Imagine someone like Jerry Falwell in a country as chaotic and mob-ruled as India (I've lived in India for a while and LOVE it, but this is hard to deny).

  3. dear sensitive religious types by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Insightful

    hindus upset at orkut, muslims upset at muhammed cartoons, christians upset at crosses in pee, etc:

    i believe that your religion is strong and powerful and moving

    apparently, you don't

    for if you did, you would not be so threatened by such random fluff

    or, alternately, if these stupid offenses affect you, your religious faith is shallow

    you do not honor god/ allah/ shiva/ whomever by being moved by the most contrived of offenses that even a child could shrug off and roll his eyes at

    when you do, you make a mockery of what they stand for, by showing that some of your religions followers (you) are of small easily swayed faith

    you're a shame to your own religion, and your cheap outrage cheapens your religion

    signed,
    people with faith and maturity

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:dear sensitive religious types by Gryle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's okay to be offended by what you perceive to be a mockery of something you hold dear. What's not okay is taking criminal action towards those who have offended you.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
  4. Forget lawsuits by WrongMonkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hope that the RIAA doesn't change tactics after hearing about this

  5. Anyone else have to look up Orkut? by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 3, Informative

    Orkut is apparently like MySpace, with forums and the like. Just thought I'd throw that out there, since TFA did such a great job of not saying what it is. Here's the wiki

  6. When I observe how religious believers behave... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...I thank god that I'm an Atheist.

  7. Re:What the hell is Orkut? by wizardforce · · Score: 3, Informative

    Google Orkut... it is a social networking site, a lot like Myspace or Livejournal. Here is the orkut homepage link: www.orkut.com Here is the link to the Wikipedia article about it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orkut

    --
    Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
  8. Re:chocolate christ by suv4x4 · · Score: 4, Funny

    commoditization of christ for easter

    Yes, they're making mockery of Jesus by tying him randomly to Easter like thatg. What's Easter got to do with Jesus anyway.

    It's about bunnies, people! Next thing, they'll tie him to Christmas as well. Idiots.

  9. Re:pfft... by mercurialmale · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Specifics aside, this kind of thing is just another piece of why India (as opposed to China, Vietnam etc.) remains all talk and no action. Would you, as an American or EU business owner want to set up shop in a country where these types of things are routine events?

    ...As opposed to setting up shop in a country where you toe the official party line or ship out?

    This is Freedom 101 - you need to put up with idiots and their opinions. India is perhaps the only recently independent nation that has even attempted to achieve an essentially open society. In India, we are free to express and actively promote our views - and that includes morons such as these RSS guys. What's not mentioned in TFA is that we also have recourse to the courts and the police, who, while inefficient, generally do come through in guaranteeing our basic safety.

    India continues to prove itself incapable of shaking off such middle ages thinking


    Thank you for judging me and my entire country based on the actions of these asshats. Should I go ahead and assume that all Americans think like Ann Coulter?

  10. Mod parent up by mercurialmale · · Score: 5, Informative
    Spot on - this has nothing to do with religion. Note that the real Hindu clergy is not protesting.

    This is pure, filthy politics - the Shiv Sena and their ilk are just trying to fight their own growing irrelevance - this is just to remind the UPA government that they still have the power to make life difficult - an attempt to gain leverage on some obscure internal negotiations, perhaps.

    You and I are not the intended audience for this charade - the current administration is. The poor Internet cafes are merely caught in the crossfire.

    And finally to all those who lament censorship in India, please don't worry on our behalf. We Indians have seen off graver challenges to our freedoms. We maintain a level of openness unmatched in the third world, and it will take more than a few assholes like these guys to change that. We're far from perfect in this regard, of course, but we'll get by just fine.

    1. Re:Mod parent up by XchristX · · Score: 3, Insightful



      Really?

      Here is an interesting interview of Nobel Laureate V.S. Naipaul that points out how the "Indian Intelligentsia" (ie communist fanatics and Islamists) deliberately skew media reports against the Shiv Sena as part of a systematic campaign of hatred directed against Hindus. The Shiv Sena has done more for the emancipation of the Maharashtrian poor then any of the leftist parties who attack and villify them.


      Also notable is Naipaul's famous observation in his bestseller "India, A Wounded Civilization":

      <quote>
      There was one portrait. And interestingly, it was not of the leader of the Shiv Sena or of Shivaji, the 17 th century Maratha King, but of the long-dead Dr. Ambedkar...Popular-and near-ecstatic-movements like the Shiv Sena ritualize many different needs. The Sena here, honouring an angry and (for all his eminence) defeated man, seemed quite different from the Sena the newspapers wrote about
      </quote>

      I'm not a big fan of Shiv Sena or the RSS in general. But when I see our own media attack and villify them as part of a shameless excuse to pander to a rising tide of Communist and Islamic Fundamentalism, while ignoring the brutal and barbaric massacres and atrocities against Hindus in Kashmir, Pakistan, Bangadesh, and even at times condoning them, and when Communists in the media openly attack Hindus and demand for their mass killings, I have no choice but to speak out, even though, on leftist-dominated slashdot, that makes me a "Filthy Hindu animal" worthy only to be a hateful object.

      Sorry, but in an atmosphere when rabid Indophobia and anti-Hinduism is tolerated and a culture of hatre is built against them, how the hell do you expect them to react? Bend over and take it?

      The RSS was basically founded as a social service organization for the emancipation and protection of poor Hindus during the 1940's in a rising tide of violence directed against Hindus by Islamic Fundamentalist mobs during the Islamic Caliphate resurrection movement in India and the days following the anti-Hindu genocides in Bengal (the Direct Action Riots instigated by the Pakistani Nationalists and the Partition massacres). In that sense, they were more like the Anti-Defamation League in the US contemporary to that period. For the most part, even currently their primary goals are social service, the emancipation of the poor (the RSS spent millions coordinating relief efforts during the 2004 Tsunami disaster in South India), an active campaign against untouhability and caste bigotry (60% ofRSS members are Dalits and other lower castes), and trying to provide a unified political emancipation movement for Hindus in a rising climate of hostility against them, much like Irish Nationalism or Zionism in Israel.

      However, because this would endanger the power base upper-caste dominated left wing government and polity in India and their Islamist votebank, they started a virulent hate campaign against the RSS, one that spilled over to hatred against Hindus in general. Eventually, they were pushed hard enough to the wall to start pushing back, that's all.















      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
    2. Re:Mod parent up by stony3k · · Score: 3, Informative

      Umm... when was the last time V. S. Naipaul lived in India, and I mean lived, not visited. He should not comment on things he has no clue about. The problem with many of the Indians living outside India is that they have been fed a lie that Hinduism is under attack in India and is dying. Nothing could be further from the truth, just going by the sheer number of people who are present whenever any so-called "Godman" comes to town.

      I'm not denying that there is a section of the Indian polity that is often anti-hindu because of vote bank politics. But there is equally a section that is rabidly pro-hindu because of vote bank politics.

      Have you ever stopped to wonder why every news story about Shiv Sena involves vandalism - they're never doing anything constructive, always destructive. It's no wonder then that they find themselves slowly losing favor in the eyes of the common man.

      --
      Freedom is not worth having if it does not include the freedom to make mistakes. - Mahatma Gandhi
    3. Re:Mod parent up by XchristX · · Score: 3, Informative

      The problem with many of the Indians living outside India is that they have been fed a lie that Hinduism is under attack in India and is dying. The problem with Indians in India is that they are too blinded by propaganda disseminated by a Communist intelligentsia, moderated by a socialist regime, and aggravated by the rising tide of Islamist militancy in the country. It is precisely the objectivity of outside observation that Naipaul brings to the Indian social landscape, something which Indians in India do not possess, unfortunately. It is a sad day for the Indian intellect when an outsider like Naipaul is needed to expose the reality...

      they're never doing anything constructive, Really? Who do you think improved living conditions in the Dharavi Slum in Mumbai (the worst slum in Asia)? The Shiv Sena. Yet, nobody but Naipaul wrote about that obvious fact (known to most Mumbaikars). Who do you think build all those expressways in Mumbai and removed the congested traffic that was choking the city's economy, the Shiv Sena. Also a fact known to most Mumbaikars. Yet, it is only mentioned by the media as an insignificant footnote.
      There is most definitely a pervasive media bias against the Shiv Sena. A bias that stems from Islamist votebank politics, motivated primarily by a sense of "My enemy's enemy is my ally" style of realpolotik and the desire of the left to ultimately eradicate all criticism from Hindus and render India a totalitarian, communist regime.
      What about the thuggery and villany of the Communist Party? What about the decades of nepotism, corruption, and state-sponsored buggerry conducted by Communist bastard despots like Jyoti Basu in West Bengal? What about the thugs and murderer Communists called Naxalites inIndia's red corridor (Bengal, Bihar, orissa and northern AP)? How well does the Indian Media report about their killings, rapes, bombings and Pakistani support? No, the Indian media is only obsessed with Hindus.
      How well does the media report the attacks on poor Hindus carried out by the Communist thugs in Nandigram just a few months ago? In the finest traditions fo Stalin and Mao, the CPM massacred dozens of poor Hindus in Nandigram , and the media conveniently hid the whole damn thing under the rug. Only the international media reported on it with any degree of objectivity.
      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
    4. Re:Mod parent up by XchristX · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Check out the many number of books and articles written by Arun Shourie during his journalistic days I know Shourie's works vry well. Communists hate Shourie and loathe him...

      They came into being because the 'State' failed to do its duties and instead abused the citizens. It is a well known fact that the police and the politicians abuse their power and the poor are hapless observers. This was the cause for the naxalites to come into being Bollox. Naxalism is pure and simple terrorism. They are merely a subversive group of thugs and murderers who decided to take over a bunch of colleges and start raping babies. Might want to read about Their gangster leaders Charu Mazumdar and Kanu Sanyal. Kanu Sanyal invented the Naxalite terror tactic (called Yugantar). Sanyal openly admitted that he was a terrorist. He was proud of it. He is no better than Osama bin-Laden and deserves the same fate. Instead, he stands merrily prancing about the country as a statesman.

      they are equally reticent about any disruptive actions of the Indian military in Kashmir and the various Kashmiri leaders that are under house arrest Sure, sure, and 9/11 was a joint US/Israeli conspiracy, the 2004 tsunami was secretly planned by the Indian government, and the Protocols of the learned elders of Zion actually happened, right?

      /sarcasm

      Nice try Osama, but the Indian Military's actions in Kashmir are a response to massive human rights violations by the Islamists against the Kashmiri Hindus, millions of them have been ethnically cleansed by Muslim militants. It is the religious intolerance and racism of the Islamists that brought their fate upon them.
      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
  11. Re:India is not a Western nation. by whackeroony · · Score: 5, Informative
    I am feeding the troll (sigh!) but well here it goes. I am an Indian and you, AC, are full of crap.

    India may be a democracy, but it is not a Western nation. Being a democracy does not mean that a nation is a democracy. Look at Singapore.

    The first sign that the AC is out of his league. Yes, India is not a perfect democracy ( who is anyway? ) but comparing it to Singapore - a small island nation whose citizens themselves consider the polls to be a sham (wiki link here ) - is a complete joke. Come on, at least India does not have a one-party government that tries to sue the opposition into oblivion.

    India, as any other democracy, has its share of nutjobs. The BVS and Shiv Sena, as has been pointed out by other posters, are essentially groups of uneducated riff-raff that try to present themselves as nationalists to distinguish themselves from common thugs ( which they are in reality ). They have little influence beyond Mumbai.

    In the India of today, honor killings are so widespread that it is a national pasttime. An honor killing is murdering a wife because her family has not provided sufficient dowry to the husband.

    No my dear AC. Honor killings are not what you presented (link). They are women that are killed if they are suspected to have brought dishonor to the family (unwanted pregnancy, etc.). They are extremely rare in India and are more a part of life of our friends across the border in Pakistan ( and other such Islamic societies) than ours.

    What you did state about dowry killings(link) is exaggerated. While it is true that bride burning is still present in India, due to many high-profile convictions in the recent past, it is abhorred widely and the burden of proof is on the suspected in-laws. However, unfortunately, dowry as a social phenomenon still exists in India.:(

    Finally, the Indians are aggressively building nuclear weapons.

    Having been attacked by 2 totalitarian neighbours (who are allied strongly with each other) 4 times in the last 50 years is not a good enough excuse ? Then, pray, why do the United States and Russia, which are far removed from their enemies, have the largest nuclear arsenals in the world ? Anyway, having nuclear devices without a proper delivery system can hardly be considered aggressive.

    So, India is a democracy, but it is not a Western nation.

    So, you took all this effort to point out the obvious. As we say in north India, shabaash mere puttar ! ( well done, my son !)

    Coming back to the topic, as I said before, this is a very local event. The Economic Times is HQ-ed in Mumbai which is why it has received more prominence than necessary. From my personal experience, I can speak of places with worse kinds of restrictions in India. There are hamlets controlled by some political party/ religious group/ communists where information from the outside world, in any form, is not allowed unless they are filtered by the party thugs. But, I would be more worried by the fact that most of rural India, if they ever cared, would not be able to connect to orkut because of the pathetic infrastructure in those parts, rather than being banned from doing so by a collection of retards.

    My INR 10

  12. This Story Is Not About "Nationalists" by Skippi+Sunshine · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's about RELIGION and should be labelled as such. Don't be such pansies, Slashdot. Call religious lunatics what they are. Don't hide them as "nationalists."

  13. Re:omfg, are you retarded? by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Dear, AC, thanks for your concern about my mental health. For your information, I'm not retarded. Bravo for not only hiding behind the AC option but for starting your reply with an ad hominem attack.

    The US, whether you like it or not, is one of the few countries in the world where someone's religion dictates whether or not they can seriously run for office.

    Polls have been taken on the subject and, when asked, something like 52 percent of Americans have said that they would not vote for an aethiest. That alone shows how much of a ceiling your religion (or lack thereof) poses in the US. Neither of the two main political parties would even consider nominating a non-Christian candidate because his/her religion alone would lose them the race: policies and job suitability wouldn't even factor into it.

    Compare that to anywhere else in the developed world. I live in the UK, and I can tell you that we wouldn't give a fig what religion someone was before voting for or against them. We certainly wouldn't be using religious litmus tests as you do in the US.

    Creationism? Abortion? Seperation of church and state but "One nation under God", and with the motto "In God we trust"?

    As for politics and policies, I can give you clear examples of how serious political debate has been stifled in the US post-September 11th. Perhaps you missed the instances of TV shows being cancelled because of comments people made questioning what was going on and why it was happening? Or how any voice raised in dissent was shouted down as anti-American? Don't you remember any of that?

    What was wrong with asking why the US was attacked in the first place? Are you seriously telling me that that's been questioned by anybody outside the fringes?

    It's only now that this shit has been going on for years and it's cost the lives of over 3,000 US troops (hey, let's not think about the 100,000s of dead Iraqi civilians - they clearly don't count) that serious questions are given more than short shrift by the mainstream media.

    (Still, though, the lunatics running the asylum see nothing wrong. And the lunatics wanting to replace them aren't any better: the eight Republican nominees were asked whether knowing what they know now if they would have done anything differently in Iraq, to which none of them had the common sense to say "yes". Even after seeing the disasterous consequences of the path that they've travelled, they'd still go down that road again.)

    Elsewhere, District Attorneys are being fired for political purposes. But, of course, when it's discovered, the people in charge have "no recollection" of what happened.

    I won't even talk about voter disenfranchisement. Go read up on that before you comment again though.

    Of course, I'm sure you'll say that none of that counts. To be honest, if it wasn't helping to screw the rest of us, I wouldn't give a shit. But it does, so I'm telling you, as a friend, this shit is happening, and it does you no favours to be lecturing the world on religious and political freedoms when your own country's record in that area is far from perfect.

    The politics of the US aren't any better than that of anywhere else. If you, like the person who I initially replied to, truly consider the US to be a place where religious and political freedoms are respected then you're looking through rose-tinted glasses.

    Feel free to tell me I'm wrong and how. Just save the "retard" tag, OK?

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  14. Violence, Retardation, Religion. by crhylove · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Of COURSE these ignorant butt-plugs want to censor stuff. The only way anybody can keep talking to imaginary men in the sky and believing in that kind of nonsensical clap trap is to keep the blinders fully on. A quick reading of every wikipedia article for every religion shows how ludicrous every religion really is.

    Go ahead, god squad, mod me down, but the days when society lacks the information to see through your horse shit philosophy systems is at hand. In a few generations, only real Luddites or actual retards will worship invisible men in the sky.

    Information wants to be free. And humans want information. The days of praying to "holy ghosts" and multi-armed gods of war and love are ending. I just wish they would end sooner, like before we have another catastrophic global war, or completely destroy the environment.

    *sigh* Seems unlikely though.

    rhY

    --
    I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
  15. Re:Moderation abuse by saforrest · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I suspect it's the second and/or third.

    I suspect strongly that it's the first. Most Slashdot readers have very little clue what is going on in India, and probably didn't read past the first few sentences before modding.

    The act of stridently assigning blame for political ills to Communists and Islamists (as those first few sentences do) will strike a chord with most Americans, and echoes a lot of the rhetoric (historical and modern) from their own leaders. The idea that this sort of rhetoric would be happening in very different and faraway place turns the familiarity of such statements into humour.

    Hence the "funny" mod. I really think that's a much more plausible explanation than deliberately abusive modding.