Slashdot Mirror


Ubuntu Linux Validates As Genuine Windows

bobbocanfly writes "Another crack in the Windows Genuine Advantage wall. A user at UbuntuForums.org managed to validate an Ubuntu installation as a genuine copy of Microsoft Windows and get to the download page of Windows Defender, using IE4Linux and Wine. (Here is an OGG video of the process.) Along with the advancement of LiveCD technology, this could spell the end of Microsoft's control over who gets their updates."

9 of 401 comments (clear)

  1. Dual boot machine? by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 3, Interesting
    It may well be that WGA allows Linux/Wine on the basis that it is too difficult to check if a valid Windows is being used alongside it. It would not surprise me, though, if the test machine was dual boot and WGA properly validated the available Windows system.

    WGA has become pretty sophisticated this year, as recently has OGA. I strongly suspect that the observed behavior is by design, though Microsoft may now choose to change it.

  2. Uh, you can just use Windows 2000. by urbanriot · · Score: 3, Interesting

    With earlier versions of Windows, prior to Windows XP, you can download any and all updates without having to validate your Windows.

  3. Re:I hope so-Fruit juice. by ericrost · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Main reason Linux v Apple (in my case) was I already own 3 or 4 different computers, and I'm not replacing them, just reformatting. Now I have a home server, a firewall/gateway server, and a few more usable workstations. Not just two junk computer sitting in a corner, and two pcs sitting there not talking to each other :).

    But, for someone that isn't entrenched in hardware, I can see the option.

  4. And this would be good because? by fsmunoz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Microsoft has every right to limit updates to valid licences. I don't understand how this is "good news". Well, apart from the "MS sucks again, ahaha" angle.

    We complain that there is a MS tax. We complain that they hardsell licences. I would be very happy is Microsoft really had a way to limit the updates. Hell, even with Linux one *pays* for the updates in some distros, and there is nothing wrong with that. Plus, if piracy beneficts Microsoft - and it does - putting an end to it is all the better. Windows is "cheap" because many people are used to cracking all the software they have installed and then complaining about "there isn't a program in Linux/BSD that does *everything* I need and exactly the way I need".

  5. Re:Ubuntu Meme by Virgil+Tibbs · · Score: 4, Interesting

    whats even more interesting is this, ubuntu versus some [possibly] major other distributions...
    feel free to berate me on not including the distro of your choice, (but add your own findings if you have any...

    --
    www.tdobson.net #### Dare to Dream #### blog.tdobson.net
  6. Re:Yeah, damn Microsoft by ScrewMaster · · Score: 3, Interesting

    On the other hand, if they went to a torrent-style swarming download scheme bandwidth costs wouldn't be an issue (I assume that's what you are referring to.) Personally, I believe that if Microsoft wants to continue to enjoy their current status as the leading provider of security-challenged applications and operating systems, they should be required to provide free updates. Either that, or Microsoft should have to reimburse everyone else for the bandwidth costs incurred by the hundreds of millions of infected Windows installations worldwide. For that matter, how about all the millions of man-hours lost because of instabilities in Microsoft's products. Heck, I'd say providing Windows updates is the least that company can do, given the grief they've caused so many others.

    I've often wondered what would have happened if Windows had never been, if some other OS (say a Unix variant of some kind, or perhaps one of the other OSes that Microsoft eclipsed) had become dominant, one that was fundamentally more secure than Windows. We might never have seen the billions of dollars being lost to spam and armies of rooted Windows boxes. Anyway you look at it, Microsoft has much for which to atone, and doing what it can to keep Windows users from being pwned the minute they jack in their systems or try to read an email isn't asking for much.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  7. Re:Rights matter. by crazyjimmy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Genuine Advantage wasn't part of the agreement I signed. It didn't exist.

    Why is it now necessary for my computer to stay up to date?

    Why do you think that's ok?

    Why?
    --Jimmy

  8. Re:I hope so-Fruit juice. by BrokenHalo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    All u*x desktops, other than Apple, look way to clunky to me. I love love Linux more ..... But how many of you leave the wives that you love to sleep with some slut? *sigh*

    Different strokes for different folks, I guess. I really like Gnome, and Apple's UI irritates me, because it gets in the way of the way I like to work. But I guess that's all part and parcel of the way Apple insists that you "think outside the box the way WE tell you to, dammit!".

    Having said that, I like the way Apple integrates nicely into a *nix network without having to fuck around with Samba or other esoteric interfaces.

  9. Re:Rights matter. by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "I guess they are saying your computer is as up to date as they are going to make it without WGA.

    In essence, they terminated your support for updates and you renewed it by doing the WGA thing. And no, I am not saying it is right. But even if you purchase the full version, you only get so much free support. the rest is basically MS acting as if they are doing you a favor. I don't remember anything in the license or on the box about updates being provided.

    They really don't have a choice - either FIX the defective OS via patches or face a class-action suit for selling a grolssly defective product. Don't kid yourself - the only person who benefits from Microsoft's actions is Microsoft. Limited warranties don't add to your rights, they take away from them. Most jurisdictions have laws that state that a purchase has to be useful for its intended purpose for a reasonable amount of time. 20 seconds between connecting to the net and getting p0wned is not "reasonable" - especially when there are free OS available that don't have these defects.