Slashdot Mirror
Congress Considering More Low Power FM Stations
Skapare writes "According to this ReclaimTheMedia article, the Local Community Radio Act of 2007 (PDF) would remove the artificial restrictions imposed on LPFM by a 2000 law passed at the urging of corporate radio giants and NPR, claiming that small community stations would interfere with the signals of larger stations. If passed, this bill will pave the way for educational groups, nonprofits, unions, schools and local governments to launch new local radio stations across the country."
Because it is public property, not the property of mega corporations. They should have a right to use the airwaves for their small businesses or nonprofits without being part of the media cartels.
Our town recently became the beneficiary of a LPFM station and it carries interviews, rock, country, jazz, hiphop, news, talk... has over a dozen jocks. I can listen to it in the car and streamed online. It's, in a word, GREAT. I listen to a local AM station for about 1/10 the time I used to. No other FM around here appeals to me. I'm not associated with the station in any way.
yet.
Without reading the article I can conclusively state I'm behind every effort to expand private and low-power penetration of the airwaves.
Another 5000 religious satellite-based repeater stations and just about zero actual local stations. Just like the last time.
Now my iPod FM trasmitter will suck even more.
I'm smart enough to live in a town cool enough to have our own local radio station, and I agree with the other posters. It's great. It's run by local people, often playing local music. The only other radio worth listening to is NPR.
Fuck Clear Channel.
I don't respond to AC's.
I was involved in the pirate radio scene in San Francisco and Santa Cruz. Down in Santa Cruz they had this micro-power radio station set up in the local anarchist house, which was also the main Food not Bombs house. The FCC found out about it and came to try to bust them, but somehow they got word and skedaddled. No lie, they loaded up the station in a Food not Bombs bike cart and pedaled that sucker from hill to hill for a week, always one step ahead of the FCC snoops. Then the anarchist house started to sink into a sinkhole and got condemned, so the anarchists all had bigger things to worry about.
They had a stand off with the authorities for a month before the cops finally got a court order and raided the house. Funny story, they had this weird guy who lived in the attic and saved all his pee in jars, so they booby trapped the place with jars of pee. Those were not happy cops that day, I'll tell you what. But the spirit of the place was broken, and Santa Cruz lost its pirate radio.
In San Francisco, the station I knew had an actual studio in the Labor Temple right next to my IWW union office, and no one bothered them much. Heh, if you lived within five blocks of Mission and 16th, you might even have heard them. Woot! 30 whole watts of AWESOME POWER! Ah, good times, good times.
- None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
Because not everyone has the internet. Because listening to internet radio in your car is not an option for most people. Because radio is still a vital art form.
This law is essential to undo the injustice of the 2000 law.
http://use.perl.org
Seems like the solution to that is obvious -- don't allow repeaters.
I think it could be a boon for colleges and small organizations that might be interested in having a radio station, but that can't afford one currently because it's so expensive to get spectrum.
"Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
Ramsey Electronics will sell you a 50 watt LPFM Radio Station In A Box for $4000.
The price of a single high-end laptop. The non-profit may want to reach the audience that doesn't have dial-up service, much less WiFi or broadband cable: the poor, the elderly, the disabled, etc.
Because it is public property, not the property of mega corporations. They should have a right to use the airwaves for their small businesses or nonprofits without being part of the media cartels.
Then it must be regulated! Can't let the public get out of hand. Better that they spend their money on items to express their personality than to express their discontent in a society that abuses them.
http://use.perl.org
LPFM stations do interfere with signals of larger stations. A local high school station near my house - WPHS - is supposed to broadcast on 89.1FM.
e x.html
S &service=FM&status=L&hours=U
However WPHS interferes with "large" FM 88.7 CIMX broadcasts in an ~ 2 mile radius from the location of WPHS. When tuned to 88.7 FM CIMX , the static and interference from WPHS makes it impossible to listen to CIMX in the area. The inference is not isolated to 88.7 FM but extends to adjacent channels 88.5 - 89.9 FM and can be clearly heard in this entire spectrum - so clear that you would assume that WPHS was actually broadcasting on every FM channel in this range.
WPHS http://www.wcs.k12.mi.us/cousino/WPHS%20radio/ind
Coverage area.
http://www.radio-locator.com/cgi-bin/pat?call=WPH
4000!!!!??? I am sure if you go to that pirate radio site in Berkly you could get schematics for the same radio and parts for less than 400. I agree about the reaching people without computers.
Tired of all the isms, don't exploit people as an employer, or a government, mmmmK?
Before trying to create the truth by repeating a lie, get the facts. In my market, on the fm dial, we have 3 general college radio stations. We have one left radio station, and two other college stations that are leftish. We have 3 christian radio stations. The other 20+ stations are commercial, I believe mostly owned by two or three enitites. At times over the past couple years, one could find 2 pairs of stations playing the same content. I do not think these stats are atypical.
The overcrowding of the FM dial is real. There are times when, at least on an analog tuner, it is difficult to distinguish a single station. NPR is not, with it's single station, or at most two, in each market, crowding the dial. What is crowding the dial is the relaxation of the ownership rules. While the summery touched on this with putting corporate radio first, the summary also implied that the problem will be solved by simplying allowing the airwaves to become more crowded.
This will not solve the problem. And while Fox news is not going to state the obvious solution, I will. Limit ownership of bandwidth to one station per entity. If the FCC wants to a vibrant radio dial, review the rules set 10 years ago. There is not reason why a single entity should ever own more that a couple stations in any market. Period. If that means the commercials stations drop precipitately, so be it. There are evidently operators out there biting at the bit, angry that they cannot get a place to play. Ownership rules will open up that space.
"She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
Not everyone has a multihundred dollar smart pda wifi equipped cellphone thingamajig and hangs out within 50 feet of starbucks so they can get netstreams while they are out and about. A shirt pocket FM radio complete with ~quality~ 5 cent earbud costs one dollar at the buckstore. And it works, and only takes one double AA and lasts for weeks.
That's why FM radio is still a good option. And the transmitter for low power is pretty cheap, and no need to pay for expensive bandwith or whatnot, and as many people as there are locally who can tune it all get the same stream of talk or whatever, infinitely scalable, 100 to a million, as long as you are in range, you get the same thing everyone else can get.
Enough reasons?
Democrats aren't pushing this bill so that people are being free. Democrats are pushing this bill because they hope the explosion of extra channels will dilute the audience for right wing radio stations. Given the right wing media's scathing rebuttal of elected Republicans on what is actually a damned good immigration bill, I would be surprised if Republicans in the Congress did not support this.
Still, pay close attention to how this bill is being written and who can actually get these stations and who can't. Democrats are going to push to make sure that their people get the stations, and Republicans need to be on their toes to make sure their people get theres. If you see things like city governments, universities, and public schools getting more stations (all traditionally liberal points), then the Democrats are playing games. If you see things like churches, local chambers of commerce, adult groups like the FreeMasons, or even gun clubs getting them, then you can bet that Republicans win.
If they compromise and everyone can get a station, then it is a good bill.
This is my sig.
RADIO WINS
If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
Or, go here http://www.pcs-electronics.com/pc-transmitters-c-6 4.html#Pci%20max and put your own box together for less.
"Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
Sometimes, you just want to turn on a station. Maybe you'll get talk. Maybe you'll get some new music, a local band putting out something. Maybe you'll even get a radio drama (I just finished producing one this semester).
But the idea is that, with radio, you and possibly a number of others near you are listening to the same thing. And that sense of community, specifically within a physical space, is powerful.
Aren't all analog transmissions going to end in a couple years?
Technoli
The Ramsey unit is quite literally a commercial grade - FCC certified - station in a box.
50 Watt Output. CD-Recorder. Tascom CD-Dual Cassette Deck. Audio mixers. Studio microphone. Antenna. 100 Watt Stereo Amp for local PA. The whole nine yards. Shock-mounted. Dump it in the back of a truck. Set up anywhere.
The Tascom deck alone lists at $950.
You might be right, but all I need is one more local Christian 'holier than thou, we're all going to hell in a handbasket' radio station blotting out my daily dose of NPR on the way to work in the morning. Nothing more annoying than a niche station from ANOTHER STATE interfering with your daily news update.
Speak for yourself.
I would also suggest that the radio is FAR more effective than the internet for reaching a geographically concentrated target audience. Think of small town USA, not just the urban megalopolis.
People who think they know everything really piss off those of us that actually do.
A few reasons:
You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
claiming that small community stations would interfere with the signals of larger stations.
Who complains when it is the other way around? I remember when the campus station came on the air at Macalester College in St. Paul, MN and I could pick it up from a few miles away if I clicked "mono". Easy to remember because seven days later our MONSTER ROCKIN' HITS! 800-lb gorilla of a station activated their gazillion watt antenna on top of a 50 story building and the overloading in my receiver splattered harmonics across the band. No more Macalester for me so I'm inclined to suspect the big players just don't want to be bothered with being good neighbors on the airwaves.
I hope this doesn't derail the bill in progress to halt the exorbitant fees they're foisting on Internet 'radio'.