Slashdot Mirror


Citizens Given Video Cameras To Monitor Police

atommota writes "After years of complaints of police misconduct, the ACLU is giving free video cameras to some residents of high-crime neighborhoods in St. Louis, MO to help them monitor officers. The ACLU of Eastern Missouri launched the project Wednesday after television crews last year broadcast video of officers punching and kicking a suspect who led police on a car chase. 'The idea here is to level the playing field, so it's not just your word against the police's word,' said Brenda Jones, executive director of the ACLU chapter. The ACLU has worked closely with the police to make sure they are aware of this program. This is in stark contrast to the recent Pennsylvania arrest for felony wiretapping of a guy who was videotaping a police stop."

32 of 434 comments (clear)

  1. What do you do it. . . by ookabooka · · Score: 4, Funny

    What do you do if the cops say "Nothing for you to see here. Please move along."?

    --
    If you are about to mod me down, keep in mind that this post was most likely sarcastic.
    1. Re:What do you do it. . . by ookabooka · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While I do appreciate the funny mod, I was also being somewhat serious, if a cop has the authority to shoo you away from a "scene" and make sure you aren't taping him/her doing something, they can still get away with doing "bad things". I guess you just have to tape them covertly? I can also see all sorts of legal issues arising from this. . .good thing the ACLU is backing it up.

      --
      If you are about to mod me down, keep in mind that this post was most likely sarcastic.
    2. Re:What do you do it. . . by TubeSteak · · Score: 5, Insightful

      if a cop has the authority to shoo you away from a "scene" and make sure you aren't taping him/her doing something, they can still get away with doing "bad things".
      My first thought was "well cops don't have the authority to shoo you away from a scene," then I realized I was wrong.

      Cops have the authority to disperse a 'crowd' so that they can maintain order. Failure to disperse = failure to obey a lawful order = arrest/taser/mace
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:What do you do it. . . by eln · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Given that it is the ACLU, they may be hoping that some police department will sue so they can have a judgment in court stating that videotaping police in public is just as legal as videotaping anyone else in public.

    4. Re:What do you do it. . . by UseTheSource · · Score: 3, Interesting

      While I may have issue with the ACLU's selective view on the Bill of Rights (they refuse to acknowledge the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right), I must admit I give kudos to them for taking this up.

      While I'm sure most law enforcement officers are good people, there are too many jack-booted thugs among the ranks, who view the Bill of Rights as a nuisance and a hindrance and/or are control freaks on a trip.

      I find it extremely distasteful that the "felony wiretap" case was in my home state of Pennsylvania.

      --
      "Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Führer." -Adolf Hitler
      "We are one Nation, we are one People." -The One 'leader'
    5. Re:What do you do it. . . by lymond01 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yah...10x digital zoom, not optical.

      Lawyer: Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury, as you can see plainly here, some Pac-Man looking individual who we assume is the victim is being bumped into repeatedly by a dark blue blob....

    6. Re:What do you do it. . . by droopycom · · Score: 3, Funny

      I totally agree, at least the President should be able to speak english!

    7. Re:What do you do it. . . by Kandenshi · · Score: 4, Funny
    8. Re:What do you do it. . . by Dadoo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yah...10x digital zoom, not optical.

      Umm, no. My camcorder is almost 5 years old. It has 6x optical zoom and 200x digital zoom. If you had actually taken the effort to check at bestbuy.com, you'd have seen camcorders with at least 35x optical and 1000x digital zoom.

      --
      Sit, Ubuntu, sit. Good dog.
    9. Re:What do you do it. . . by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...failure to obey a lawful order = arrest/taser/mace

      Hopefully not in that order.

  2. Tomorrows headlines by Kainaw · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pawn shops in high crime areas, such as St. Louis, have an overload of camcorders for sale dirt cheap!

    --
    The previous comment is purposely vague and generalized, but all of the facts are completely true.
    1. Re:Tomorrows headlines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I was hoping for a boom in amateur erotica.

    2. Re:Tomorrows headlines by BlackCobra43 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Be careful what you wish for. Have you seen the average American today?

      --
      I never spellcheck and I freely admit it. Save your karma for more worthwhile "lol erorrs" replies
  3. I do believe... by Elemenope · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...that while the ACLU is absolutely right in this context, the practical upshot of this is that many more folks in that community will become victims of Police "misconduct" due to their conspicuous wielding of cameras. And while fighting the good fight and filming anyway is great in the best of all possible worlds, that world isn't this one, and police officers know how to hurt you in real ways, not to mention the system of, ahem, Justice they represent is heavily stacked against someone who has a legit beef re: a police officer.

    Besides, on a purely practical note, after the police finish beating the crap out of you and your friend(s), how hard is it for them to confiscate and destroy a recording device?

    --
    All the techniques ever used to make men moral have been themselves thoroughly immoral... (Nietzsche)
    1. Re:I do believe... by Endymion · · Score: 3, Interesting

      While I agree that on a practical side, you are probably correct, I love that the issue is being forced. Sometimes things have to get worse before they get better, and that bridge will have to be crossed eventually. (well, short of a miracle)

      By forcing the issue now, hopefully the issue can be brought to light and fixed, and the increase in police issues could hopefully be a temporary condition. By not doing it, things just stew longer and get worse. Hopefully, the sooner it is addressed, the shorter and milder the "dangerous increase in police issues" period could be.

      --
      Ce n'est pas une signature automatique.
  4. "to help them monitor officers" by TheBearBear · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As opposed to monitoring the criminals in their neighborhood? They're as much a plague on civil liberties as big brother.

    1. Re:"to help them monitor officers" by brunascle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      i think the point is that criminals are already being monitored, but no one's monitoring the cops.

    2. Re:"to help them monitor officers" by gbjbaanb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      if the criminals were being monitored, then they wouldn't be able to commit all the crimes and then the area wouldn't be described as 'high crime' areas now would they.

      Besides, who are the ACLU giving these cameras to? Law-abiding citizens who live in these areas and are worried that the local scroats might have their civil liberties abused whilst they were committing vandalism, burglary and violent crimes against the person?

  5. Make friends, not enemies. by xplenumx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In addition to reporting any misbehavior by the police, I hope that the ACLU has enough integrity to also publicly commend any officer that is recorded acting responsibility in a difficult situation. A little positive reinforcement can go a long ways.

    1. Re:Make friends, not enemies. by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Agreed, too few people give positive feeback, they only like to complain.

      I hope they also keep the cameras running to catch any criminals. They're the ones who terrorize neighborhoods and then scare possible witnesses into keeping silent.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    2. Re:Make friends, not enemies. by heresyoftruth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In addition to reporting any misbehavior by the police, I hope that the ACLU has enough integrity to also publicly commend any officer that is recorded acting responsibility in a difficult situation. A little positive reinforcement can go a long ways.

      I don't agree. I am a nurse. I have seen other nurses out there that steal narcotics, make dangerous medical decisions, etc. Those nurses suck, and make the rest of us look bad. I don't think I should be commended for doing my job right just because there are those out there that do it badly. I am not a cop, and couldn't speak for them, but if someone tried to commend me for doing the right thing, I would be a bit disgusted. That's like saying, "Thanks for giving your patients those pain meds, instead of stealing them." or the cop equivalent, "Thanks for making that arrest without beating that guy to death." People should not be commended for doing what they are required to do by the job, and what should be a socially accepted standard of moral ethics.

      --
      Nothing hides evidence like a stew. -Gus Pratt
    3. Re:Make friends, not enemies. by rhakka · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Funny, I thought their job was to act responsibly in difficult situations?

      I will, and have, thanked officers personally for doing good work, because I appreciate it. But it's pretty ridiculous to even insinuate that an organization with a serious focus should waste its time and resources thanking people for doing their jobs.

      That would be the job of the police department itself, to recognize its own employees that do exemplary work, and reward them, not the ACLU's job, right? The ACLU's job is to make sure they do not abuse the additional power (and thus, additional responsibility) that has been accorded to them by the people they have power over.

  6. The Pennsylvania case is over by smooth+wombat · · Score: 4, Informative
    The charges in the Pennsylvania case referenced in the posting have been withdrawn.


    From the article:

    "When police are audio- and video-recording traffic stops with notice to the subjects, similar actions by citizens, even if done in secret, will not result in criminal charges."

    The fact that this made the national news doesn't surprise me. This is Pennsylvania where our new state motto is:

    Doing our best to become the next New Jersey.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  7. Re:Having had the crap beat out of me by cops... by Normal+Dan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Seriously? They beat the crap our of you because you have long hair? Or were they weary of you because of your long hair and shady demeanor? Did they really beat the crap our of you, or were they trying to subdue you using physical force when you failed to cooperate with them?

    Stopping police brutality is a good thing, but we have to be sure it is REAL brutality. Now, I do not know your situation, but I have heard so many stories similar to yours. Many backed up by video evidence. When digging further into the stories, I often find either the police did nothing wrong, or they were antagonized to the point where even a saint would have problems.

    I do belive the easiest way to stop police brutality is to be polite and cooperative. I have long hair and have a very suspicious demeanor, but when I get pulled over, I get treated with nothing but respect. I attribute this to me being polite and cooperate. Either that or I just happened to run into the only nice cops in my area.

    --
    A unique way to learn a language: http://languageloom.com
  8. In fact, you are screwed by WindBourne · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I had EXACTLY that occur back when I was 22 (sadly, that would be a LONG time ago) in Fort Collins, Co. I was a passenger in a 1 car crash. The driver was put in cuffs and a female cop started beating the driver. I stood a distance away but was telling her to stop. She told me to leave right then and there. I pointed out that would be leaving the scence of an accident, to which she replied yes, but that I was to be arrested one way or another. I chose for her to arrest me for "interfering with a lawful arrest". Once she had cuffs on me, she started to hit and kick at me. Once the 2'nd squad got there, she stopped. But of course, she had the 2 of us in cuffs, with me hoping mad. The interesting thing was that the DA dropped the charges for the interfering with a lawful arrest, but got me on some other items. Of course, had she not been beating on the driver, or had not arrested me in the first place, then the later items would never have occured. Sadly, last I heard, she and idiot (ernie telez) from FC were still working there.

    The cameras are needed.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  9. The ACLU and the 2nd amendment by benhocking · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Actually, IIRC, the ACLU has come out and said that the since NRA defends the 2nd Amendment so conscientiously, they defer such cases to them. That's not at all the same thing as refusing to acknowledge it.

    While I'm sure most law enforcement officers are good people, there are too many jack-booted thugs among the ranks, who view the Bill of Rights as a nuisance and a hindrance and/or are control freaks on a trip.

    I agree with that sentiment 100% (both parts of it).

    What's interesting is that this case seems to be pitting two things the ACLU fights for against each other. Due process vs. privacy (of the cops). I think they're making the right call here, but I still find that conflict interesting. (Just to play devil's advocate: how would you like it if someone taped most of your workday?)

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
    1. Re:The ACLU and the 2nd amendment by rhakka · · Score: 4, Informative

      Why guess?

      Here's what the ACLU says about it.

      I don't see what's "selective" about that. While any particular person (including me) may disagree with the philosophy behind it, this is a very well reasoned stance... there is ambiguity in what the constitution says and means on this issue, the ACLU protects constitutional rights when such rights are clear.

      I'm pro-gun and pro-ACLU, just to name my own bias.

  10. Re:Who cares? by Lockejaw · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You can't even claim "innocent until proven guilty", since they obviously saw the person engaged in the act.
    Yeah, with police who never arrest anyone who's innocent, why do we even have courts?
    --
    (IANAL)
  11. Re:Anybody Else by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ummm, the ACLU pays more attention to your rights than YOU do! When most of the nitwits in this country were gleefully handing over their civil liberties via the Patriot Act, the ACLU was our champion. They're the ones who defend transgressions against us when YOU would be too blinded by snap judgment to see the indignity. When government wants to take away rights, it won't be in a landmark case against a nun. It will be against the terrorist, murderer or child molester. This is the organization that defended one of its biggest deriders in Rush Limbaugh simply because they view encroachments on our rights through an agnostic lens. Now, if you can cite an example to validate your distrust...

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  12. Peter Gabriel setup something similar a while ago. by HerculesMO · · Score: 3, Insightful

    http://witness.org/

    It's tailored more to finding local stories that impact you and report on them as an amateur, but has also been lent in the same way the ACLU is working now.

    I am a big fan of the police, but dirty cops make me sick to my stomach. If they have nothing to hide, they shouldn't worry about the cameras.

    --
    The price is always right if someone else is paying.
  13. In a related story... by jpellino · · Score: 3, Funny

    Police issued huuuuuuge magnets.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  14. Re:Having had the crap beat out of me by cops... by AmazingRuss · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was in a bar when a fight broke out, and was doing my best to get out of there when I was grabbed by two portly cops, slammed against the wall, cuffed, thrown to the ground, sat on, and then punched what felt like about 100 times (probably only 10 or 15...im a sissy). The left side of my head swelled up pretty good, and I had a good bit of road rash on other parts. I was charged with resisting arrest and disorderly conduct. The cops wrote outright lies on the arrest report, the judge naturally took their word over mine (look at his spotty grooming habits!), and I spent almost a month in jail. You can't imagine what a surreal experience it is to stand there in front of a judge, black and blue, weiging 150lbs soaking wet, and hearing two beefy cops carry on about how hard you were to subdue...and having the judge act like he beleives it.

    Had I even SEEN the cops, I would have been polite and cooperative. As it was, all I got to be was a punching bag. Maybe somebody else antagonized them...I dont know. I do know they flat out lied about what happened, and I went to jail for it. If there would have been video of the event, you can bet they would have beat up the videographer too.

    I have friends that are cops, so don't think I'm down on the profession, but it does draw psychos...probably 30-40% of cops are like the ones that beat me up. Probably 30-40% of the judges are crooked or brain dead. I suppose it has always been so...but up until that happened I had thought America was special.