Slashdot Mirror


Citizen Journalism Combating Chinese Censorship

teh_commodore writes to tell us that Breitbart has a look at how Citizen Journalism is shining a whole new light on China. "Recognizing the threat of China's growing online community, Chinese President Hu Jintao called in January for the Internet to be 'purified', and the government has since launched a number of online crackdowns. [...] 'One cannot truly say that the Internet in China is becoming more and more free, because at the same time as the development of citizen journalists, the government finds ways of blocking or censoring content,' Pain said."

50 of 86 comments (clear)

  1. Local authority vs. National authority by CheeseTroll · · Score: 1

    Interesting article, showing how even as the national authorities tighten the reins on internet communications, people in China still make use of the internet to expose corruption & apathy within their local governments.

    --
    A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
    1. Re:Local authority vs. National authority by Critical+Facilities · · Score: 1

      Agreed. In addition to this possibly being an Achilles' Heel in the sense that it gives government opponents a unifying cause, it would be interesting to find out how much of a "black market" this has/will cause(d). Surely there are legions of people both inside or nearby China that could benefit from providing unfettered access to people on the inside (for a fee).
      While I realize that a vast portion of the population is very poor and thus quite unlikely to have the means to procure such "unauthorized" connections, assuredly some people have both the desire and the means. Combine this with the government's totalitarian attempts to control information, and you've got a powder keg.

  2. Benefits of Technology by jessiej · · Score: 1

    Interesting to see this posting just a few hours after the posting about our Mechanized Future. Couldn't we say that the internet is helping Chinese fight unwanted censorship... thus improving their lives..

  3. Hot Button Words by Azuma+Hazuki · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Whenever I hear people in "dear leader" positions throwing around words like purify, patriotism, freedom, etc, it makes me cringe. This is doublespeak; "purify" means "purge."

    --
    ~Eien no Inori wo Sasagete~ Searching for my Hatsumi...
    1. Re:Hot Button Words by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      ...and "purge" means "kill"

    2. Re:Hot Button Words by nphyatt · · Score: 1

      Cleanse! Purge! Kill! In the name of the Emperor, we shall bring an Exterminatus to the hereti... Oh, wait. Whoops.

    3. Re:Hot Button Words by beyondkaoru · · Score: 3, Insightful

      aye, brothers. we must rally our men to combat the numerous evils which threaten our home, the (imperium|usa|middle kingdom). there can be no rest until the (heretics and mutants|dissenters|dissenters) have been purged, and we may stand united to praise the (emperor|president|chairman)!

      but we must not merely look within to find the enemy; there is, too, the enemy without: these (xenos|muslims|capitalists)... the more i look at them, the more i come to know them, the more i come to hate them. i hate them not because they are different, but because they are not capable of pure, (human|american|maoist) (hatred|patriotism|nationalism).*

      in the grim (future|present) of the (41st millenium|21st century), there can be only war**!

      *ironically, all three benefit greatly from their enemies without; the adeptus mechanicus researches c'tan tech, the usa benefits from middle-eastern oil, china benefits from trade and manufacture.
      **on drugs/terror/whatever in the us. may vary elsewhere.

      ok, that was totally offtopic, but fun to type.

      --
      the privacy of one's mind is important.
      you do have something to hide.
    4. Re:Hot Button Words by dintech · · Score: 1

      Fun to read too. I like selecting the words that are least offensive to my sensibilities. :)

    5. Re:Hot Button Words by nphyatt · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, not all of our problems can be solved by bolter fire and throwing billions of Imperial Guard troops at various planets. Now, if only we could convince the government of such...

  4. Do they.... by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Do they not get what they deserve?

    Have they forgot how Chinese invaded Tibet and displaced the Buddhists?
    Has anybody forgot Tiananmen Square? They hunted down amateur and professional footage alike so they could go and assassinate the dissidents.
    Or in recent times, have they forgot about the forced abortions that the Chinese government puts women through for violating "Birth Law"?

    And now they wish to "clean up" the Internet. Awwww. It doesnt fit in their view of authoritarian communism.

    Who I do feel sad for are the people who live there, as many of them did NOT bring this upon themselves, however, it IS up to them to free this country of an evil tyranny.

    --
    1. Re:Do they.... by mrjb · · Score: 2, Funny

      Has anybody forgot Tiananmen Square? What square? According to the Ministery of Truth, it never happened.

      --
      Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
    2. Re:Do they.... by MightyYar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You neglect to mention that said republic has a system in place for dealing with such abuses, and while slow, it is apparently succeeding in getting the little island prison closed down.

      Sort of an important point that you missed there, since it is a way in which that republic completely differs from China.

      That and the abuses of one country do not justify the abuses of another.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    3. Re:Do they.... by triskaidekaphile · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Change from within would be nice, but there is no way change can come from within unless there is pressure from without.

      Nobody could challenge the Roman empire at its height, of course, but nobody from within could have challenged it even after the political system had started rotting. It took an outside force to economically and militarily bring down the government. Change occurred within, but it required forces from without.

      The many revolutions against the European powers in the 18th-20th centuries did not occur just because the people revolted. They would never have been able to revolt if they had not developed a middle class due to trade with foreign powers and a belief that they could rule themselves which they learned from seeing other former colonies succeed. Without either of those, independence would never have occurred.

      The Soviet Union did not break apart because the people suddenly rallied. The economy had taken a horrible toll during the Cold War and economic reforms led to political reforms. When the reactionaries tried to seize control in order to roll back those reforms, then the people did stand up. But none of it could have happened without the economic pressure from without.

      These are simplified, of course, but fair assessments. My point is that "the people" will not spontaneously restructure society. Society will perpetuate itself despite the dissidents. Why? Because society prefers stability over instability. "The people" will never generate instability; only an external actor can do that.

      --
      @HbFyo0$k8 tH!$
    4. Re:Do they.... by hackingbear · · Score: 1

      Have they forgot how Chinese invaded Tibet and displaced the Buddhists? Has anybody forgot Tiananmen Square? They hunted down amateur and professional footage alike so they could go and assassinate the dissidents. For these, nobody cares anymore.

      Or in recent times, have they forgot about the forced abortions that the Chinese government puts women through for violating "Birth Law"? For these, people do either (1) illegally ultrasound the fetus to identify the gender and abort girls; (2) pay up the penalty (which is tiny for rich people); (3) fret away and give birth anyway.
    5. Re:Do they.... by Cairnarvon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Who I do feel sad for are the people who live there, as many of them did NOT bring this upon themselves, however, it IS up to them to free this country of an evil tyranny."

      And how do you propose they do that when the vast majority don't realise the problem is that bad, or that they *could* do something about it?
      That's the entire point of censorship: to keep people in the dark about the gravity of their situation. And in almost all of mainland China, it's working perfectly.

    6. Re:Do they.... by hyperfusion · · Score: 1

      Who I do feel sad for are the people who live there, as many of them did NOT bring this upon themselves, however, it IS up to them to free this country of an evil tyranny. So... let me get this straight. You're telling Chinese citizens to free themselves of "evil tyranny"? You're telling them to revolt against their government so that they could get themselves killed? Lose a chunk of the population, chuck a few people out the window? Well, of course that's the perfect solution! After thousands and thousands of deaths, the communist government will be overthrown and the world will be a better place. Thanks.
    7. Re:Do they.... by rtb61 · · Score: 1
      The ironical point is that modern corporations from western democratic countries are right in their helping the Chinese government maintain it's corporofascist government rule. From google censoring out freedom and democracy as well as providing a range of search tools to hunt down to those web dissidents, to high tech companies providing all the hardware required as well as the ability to manufacture more, so that the Chinese government to run those high tech public control and monitoring services.

      Seriously, do you think they have any chance at all to achieve peaceful change, considering how much corporofascist profits certain individuals within that society van generate and what those individuals will do to protect those profits, and the quisling western companies who will assist in the task as long as they get a chance to share in those profits, yeah, 'Do Lots Of Evil'.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    8. Re:Do they.... by dintech · · Score: 1

      Thanks for putting that armchair revolutionary straight. :)

  5. China IS getting more free. by Prysorra · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I admit I'm a hopeless optimist, but look at it this way.

    Censorship is a tool used when you're losing control. Scary things are about to happen, and China doesn't anyone to know.

    1. Re:China IS getting more free. by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Censorship is a tool used when you're losing control.
      That is an incredibly absurd thing to say. Censorship has been practiced in many societies for thousands of years. Censorship is about maintaining control. There have always been ways around censorship, but it works because the vast majority of people either do not know to circumvent it or are too frightened of the consequences to try.

      The Chinese Communists have been using censorship since the very beginning, so it's rather silly to state "It's a sign they're losing control", when it is simply the way things are done in China. The difference is now that circumventing that censorship is a good deal easier. It is forcing the Chinese government to be more responsive to the needs of people. It's a pity that these tools hadn't been available during truly tragic periods of recent Chinese history (The Great Leap Forward).
      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  6. Yes yes by Himring · · Score: 1

    Chinese President Hu Jintao called in January for the Internet to be 'purified'

    Yes, purified I say. And, squish all bugs. Yes, every single bug is to be found and squished....

    --
    "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
  7. The cycle continues..... by TheBearBear · · Score: 2, Insightful

    until the government starts spreading fear and terror and death threats.... you know, old commy style, so that even if it is easy to circumvent censorship, people will be so afraid to do so. And then they will have won the cat and mouse game.

  8. Re:How Is This News For Nerds?? by mrjb · · Score: 3, Funny

    There's not really any tech angle here. You've never heard of The Great Firewall of China, I suppose.

    --
    Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
  9. Re:How Is This News For Nerds?? by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 1

    I don't know why all these "China & censorship" stories are relevant to slashdot. There's not really any tech angle here.

    Ever hear of the term 'IT' ? Informational Technologies?

    I'd say this certainly involves the transfer of information, or lack thereof.

  10. Re:Is our media free? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No, it's not the same. Let's take into account the advertisers, first.

    Let's say you write a fairly Apple- and Linux-centric blog (we'll call it 'athloidot') and your advertisers, who are Microsoft-centric, demand that you start posting nice things about Microsoft products. You, as the editorial staff, can either bend over and grease up, writing some nice stuff about Vista, or, you can tell the advertisers to politely fuck off and go get yourself another set of advertisers.

    Now, the bloggers in China cannot tell the Chinese government to politely fuck off, because that would be a crime punishable by imprisonment, torture, or both.

    As for whether it will offend anyone -- well, it hasn't seemed to stop Slashdot, now has it?

  11. Getting it Backwards Again by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    Instead of titling this article: Citizen Journalism Combating Chinese Censorship, wouldn't it be more accurate to have said: Chinese Censorship Combating Citizen Journalism.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  12. Assistance from the West by NJVil · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Perhaps Google, Yahoo, and other bastions of the Internet will get right on this if they're asked nicely. They've got a proven track record when it comes to assisting oppressive governments.

  13. Re:Is our media free? by MightyYar · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I agree with you, but don't you think that there is a fundamental difference between:
    • Being told what you can and cannot say, and
    • regulating your own mouth/keyboard/pen for your own social benefit

    I mean, in the first case, even if you say, "Damn the consequences, I'm going to write that article!"... the article gets removed and no one can read it. In the second case, the article remains published any you suffer the consequences. To me, there is a huge distinction there.
    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  14. Not Likely by twitter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... someday that power will expose their secrets and then be used organize their fall from power.

    How do you organize the memory hole? The problem with censored electronic media is that it eliminates the ability to reference. If your references disappear and organizers are put in jail, there will only be one coherent story.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Not Likely by BakaHoushi · · Score: 1

      This brings up some points. China is not the only one fighting its own government for freedom of information. We have hackers on this side of the Great Wall, too. It would be dangerous and difficult, but no matter how strong China's censorship is, it is not invincible.

  15. not that easy to free themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's not that easy for an oppressed people to free themselves.

    For one thing, you have to hope that a George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, etc. exist simultaneously around the same time. And also that they have the tools need to mount an effective resistance. Not every country is lucky enough to get people like that.

    The other MAJOR problem is the lack of weaponry. You see, people seem to be willing to give up all kinds of liberties when the slightest amount of feart is introduced. Now imagine the threat against you if you government is evil .. they murder and rape etc. not just the dissident but also people he/she cares about. So if a dissident is going to mount a resistance he/she has to be aware who else they're "involunteering", because it won't just be the dissident paying the price.

    It may be self satifying to place the blame on being oppressed on the oppressed (after all it liberates any feelings of obligation to help) but that doesn't mean it's the truth.

    1. Re:not that easy to free themselves by beyondkaoru · · Score: 1

      probably the even more major problem than a lack of weaponry is a lack of knowledge of history. if they don't know that a brighter future can exist compared to what they've got, they won't revolt. they'll go on thinking things are double-plus-good. often, the mainland chinese don't even know that Tienanmen square, well, happened.

      --
      the privacy of one's mind is important.
      you do have something to hide.
    2. Re:not that easy to free themselves by ultranova · · Score: 1

      So if a dissident is going to mount a resistance he/she has to be aware who else they're "involunteering", because it won't just be the dissident paying the price.

      This is a very good point, and a very good reason to support anonymous free speech. Real rebels wear masks. They are a neccessary safety device. That they are also the tools of trade for bank robbers does not change this.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  16. Re:Is our media free? by computational+super · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Amen, brother. It never ceases to amaze me how many people on /. argue that US censorship isn't really censorship because it's "appropriate censorship". We'll be oppressed, just like the Chinese, until more of us finally start to realize that we are.

    --
    Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
  17. Re:Have any of you even been to China? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    My parents just got back from a 4 month stay in China. Holy Good Heavens are you wrong in comparing the USA to China. Read about Mao's rule and it's lasting effect on China today. Read about people who were driven out of business and rebuked BECAUSE they were working professionals.

    When my parent's showed local friends a family picture (5 children), a few women wept because of a government mandated law of one child per couple.

    One interesting thing they noticed, though, is a positive side effect of their freedom being suppressed. Many people in China they met had an innocence that has been all but destroyed in much of America. What I'm referring to is the moral depravity found in the US's pop culture that is largely suppressed in China.

    My heart goes out to those overseas who are fighting for the basic rights of freedom that I've enjoyed all my life.

  18. Re:Have any of you even been to China? by Christoph · · Score: 1

    I've been there -- Shenzhen, Beijing, Shanghai, Ningbo, Guilin, and about eight small factory towns.

    There are two things I will not criticize publicly until I'm retired or travelling: Islamic extremists and the Chinese government.

    My sense is that it's like those countries with draconian drug laws (e.g. the death penalty for smuggling); you're fine as long as you don't get somehow associated with drugs (e.g. something planted on you). If that happens, you are up the creek...no right to counsel, a fair trial, humane treatment, etc.

  19. Re:How Is This News For Nerds?? by jofny · · Score: 1

    This doesn't warrant a response, but at the risk of responding to a troll, I will anyway because its important (and scary that someone might not be able to put this together themselves): Poster, "tech" comes from free scientific discourse. Censorship mutes discourse - both directly and indirectly. In the first case, as in the US, you find a government explicitly muting discourse on a particular scientific subject (stem cells and global warming). In the case of the article in question, there is no specific censorship of a technology subject, but there is a systemic attempt by a government to mute all discourse other than what is deemed acceptable. With that kind of muting, technological development stalls (or stays stalled). Given that China has the largest tech (or any other) market and given what kind of tech China COULD produce if they were allowed to speak freely, Id say censorship is directly related to Slashdot even at with the slimmest of "news for nerds" definitions. (All this aside from the fact that it's technology theyre using to censor, technology theyre using to spread the news, etc).

  20. Re:Have any of you even been to China? by ChrisA90278 · · Score: 4, Insightful



    Here in the US if you want to sell hot dogs you need about a hundred government permits. There are forms and taxes and fees just to hire the guy to run the pushcart and there is a business license and health inspectors and so on and so on. the goernment even tells you how long you can keep a hot dog after you heat it and how and where is get rid of the hot dogs you can't sell. Every stage of a hot dog vending in the US is regulated and controled by the government. In China if you want to sell hot dogs all you need is are some hot dogs. If you want to sell a picture of Micky Mouse on a tee shirt all you need is some ink and tee shirts, no need to ask Disney first I think much of China works this way. People just do what they want and if they don't cause any trouble are left alone. I won't argue it this is a good thing or bad. Maybe it's best to give up some freedom so we can eat USDA inspected hot dogs.

    But the governments are different. In the US the leaders know and accept that they will leave office one day and they are pretty sure the system of government will continue on. In China the government took power and holds power by force and the goal of the leadership is to remain in office for life.

    So in some way the people in China are more free. They can do as they
    like as long is that is no threat the government.

  21. Interesting site by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They are blocking on chinese only. By not blocking english, then they will encourage a number of chinese to learn it or some other language.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Interesting site by tinkertim · · Score: 1

      They are blocking on chinese only. By not blocking english, then they will encourage a number of chinese to learn it or some other language.

      I don't think I can fully support that claim, but I can substantiate it a bit. My blog is mostly related to free software, copyright issues and other problems that I like to discuss. I get a *significant* amount of traffic from China, and find my pages uncensored in the SE caches there.

      Likewise, my hg repos get tickled often from China. Because of the stupid NATS and proxies, I have a hard time telling humans from spiders that don't check for robots.txt, so the data can only be flawed.

      The patterns are significant outside of the data, so worth mentioning. Not a resouding endorsement of what you said, but does support it a bit :)
  22. Déj vu all over again by siriuskase · · Score: 1
    Reminds me of the popularity of fax machines in China during the years prior to and immediately following Tiananmen Square (1989). The genie is out of the bottle, I do hope the authorities don't try to stuff it back in like they tried back then.

    from someone who was in Hong Kong:

    And once again we choose not to focus too much on certain reports. China is in the midst of a historic buildup of its military. China is cracking down on unofficial news sources and asking citizens to report any unauthorized news postings on the Web./quote)
    --
    If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
    1. Re:Déj vu all over again by siriuskase · · Score: 1
      --
      If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
  23. Re:Have any of you even been to China? by Stiletto · · Score: 1

    What a time to not have mod points. You are spot on.

    It's not the case of "We have freedom, they don't!" It's more of a "We have one kind of freedom and one kind of government control, they have different kinds of freedom and government control." It's about time we all stop thinking in black-and-white terms.

  24. China will be truly free only when... by liftphreaker · · Score: 1

    China will be truly free from their commie overlords only when a soviet style revolution happens, or if there's a huge general uprising and overthrow of their beloved "leaders".

    China will never become another USA and it is foolish to want that. You'd probably see them becoming a socialist democracy sort of like a combination of India, Germany and Russia. That'll do for now.

    As for their inter-tubes, till their yoke is lifted, don't expect any miracles under their current administration.

  25. Censorship, the American way by A+Clint · · Score: 1

    Here is an interesting documentary dealing with American-style censorship and propaganda in the media. The mechanism may be different, but in the end the public is still being fed misinformation.
    Maybe we don't need a Big Brother in this country, we're all conspiring to misinform ourselves.

  26. Why can't you just mind your own business? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    If you can read Chinese, try http://bbs.people.com.cn/

    That's the billboard system hosted on China's highest ranking official propaganda website, controlled directly by the top propaganda division of the communist party. Well, just list a few post titles from the front page:

    - What does it tell that 70% of the corruptions and bribes are through the wives and mistresses?
    - Reporting the "black kiln" in sadness and horrors.
    - Is the Nanjing government going backwards in regulating the housing price?
    - 24 ways to expose corrupted officials in mainland China
    - Black kiln reminds me of the greatness of Mao Zedong
    - Why do the officials pretend they don't know?

    Does that sounds like a Gulag or 1984 situation? When did you last see similar posts hosted by either CNN or MSNBC?

    1. Re:Why can't you just mind your own business? by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      BTW- the "black kiln" story is the worst case of illegal child labor in China so far. The worst part- it went un-investigated for 10 years. I saw the news story on it (I live in China).

      --
      OSx86 FTW
  27. Re:How Is This News For Nerds?? by fbjon · · Score: 1

    This is the mother of all tech discussions. Slashdot is all about exchange of ideas and news, censorship is the opposite of that. We understand the issue, we know what censorship smells like, and we have the power to do something about it. That means you, reading this.

    --
    True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
  28. Not Breitbart at all by Scareduck · · Score: 1

    The story is attributed to Agence France-Presse, the French newswire. Breitbart doesn't publish any content of their own; so far as I know, they're just an aggregator.

    --

    Dog is my co-pilot.

  29. Re:Have any of you even been to China? by jhRisk · · Score: 1

    WTF? Nobody but Disney and the US care about Disney copyrights. Try making "Jintao Sucks" T-shirts like the Bush ones I see and see if they let you. Correction... see how long you last before getting thrown in jail. Correction... see how long you last, PERIOD!

    [quote]People just do what they want and if they don't cause any trouble are left alone.[/quote] Correction... People just do what they want and if they agree with everything the government says and do everything they ask only then are they left alone. Sure, that sounds like freedom.

    Don't mistake process for impeding on freedom.

    PS. That "freedom" the imaginary hotdog vendor has in China results in him/her selling rotten REAL DOG slaughtered last month after he was lucky enough to stumble upon Fido's sickly corpse in the local human waste disposal pit.

    --
    That's just my POV... no more, no less.