Slashdot Mirror


Apple and AT&T Announce iPhone Service Plans

daveschroeder writes "Apple and AT&T today announced service plans for iPhone, 4 days before its release in the US at 6pm local time on Friday, June 29. The plans are $59.99/mo for 450 minutes, $79.99 for 900 minutes, and $99.99 for 1350 minutes, and all include unlimited data, 200 SMS messages, rollover minutes, and unlimited mobile-to-mobile calling. Any other standard AT&T service plan may also be used. A two year service plan is required, with a $175 cancellation fee if terminated early. In addition, activations are done via iTunes, so only the hardware is purchased in the store. Interestingly, activation of a contract via iTunes is required to enable the iPod/syncing functionality of the phone as well. (It will remain to be seen whether there are workarounds for this for those who only want the iPod functionality of iPhone, and whether the iPhone is easily unlockable for those who wish to try it on alternate carriers, and so on.)"

14 of 538 comments (clear)

  1. A few other notes by daveschroeder · · Score: 5, Informative

    - iPhone DOES have a user-accessible SIM tray.

    - Since one would presume the iPod functionality of the device still needs to work when the contract expires, there is probably going to be a fairly easy hack/workaround to use only the iPod functionality (e.g., perhaps just a file sitting somewhere, a la .AppleSetupDone).

    - It will be interesting to see whether AT&T will unlock the phone on request, as they do for other GSM phones (for international travel and prepaid SIMs), and if that is the case, how well other carriers' networks work with iPhone (obviously sans things like Visual Voicemail).

    - Still no word on battery replacement specifics, but it seems safe to assume that iPhone is the same as iPod in this respect; namely, that it is sealed and that the battery isn't "user accessible", but that there will still be plenty of ways to replace the battery yourself or via third parties if you so choose (battery failure under warranty would be covered by the warranty). I'm going to be tracking this issue here.

    - Still no word on insurance or AppleCare, but since all iPods have AppleCare options ($59 for two years), iPhone probably will as well.

    - Two more days to determine this for certain, but it appears that if only the iPod/syncing functionality (or first time setup, anyway) is what is tied with iTunes activation, WiFi via the browser will probably work fine as-is without a contract. Note: it is not certain that this is the case, but it seems likely. (Just a point of information; not stating this as inconrtovertible fact. The only way this might not be the case is if the entire phone is just locked until activated, which seems unlikely.)

    - Also remains to be seen how "hackable" the phone is in general. Here's to hoping.

  2. Unlimited Data. by Silas+Palmer-Cannon · · Score: 5, Informative

    Some carriers define "unlimited data" as some arbitrary level, which once you break you either lose service, or are charged a hefty fee. Just something to keep in mind.

  3. Alternate carriers by Diordna · · Score: 5, Interesting

    (It will remain to be seen whether there are workarounds for this for those who only want the iPod functionality of iPhone, and whether the iPhone is easily unlockable for those who wish to try it on alternate carriers, and so on.)

    Apparently, Apple had to make AT&T make changes to the voicemail system to accommodate some nifty features, so if you switched carriers, you might lose voicemail.

  4. Re:For the Love of Money by daveschroeder · · Score: 5, Informative

    Nice slashvertisement there, Dave.

    So, people aren't interested in this?

    Ooookayyyy...

    You want me to spend a minimum of $59.99/mo. + $499 for an iPhone?

    No, I don't "want" anyone to do anything, other than know that plans have been released for iPhone.

    Which is what a lot of people have been waiting for.

    Which is why I submitted the story.

    What else can you expect from a fat cat sconnie who prides himself on the BMWs he's owned and lists his top 'interest' as Apple?

    Sorry I didn't submit as AC. Maybe I will next time to please you! And "fat can sconnie". Heh.

    Also, I must deeply apologize for being interested in Apple. I know it's a rare ailment, and that it must offend you greatly. I'm almost shedding a tear!

  5. AT&T? by Guppy06 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "The plans are $59.99/mo for 450 minutes, $79.99 for 900 minutes, and $99.99 for 1350 minutes,"

    Man, it sure is expensive these days to get illegally wiretapped.

  6. Re:Unlimited data, eh? by eric2hill · · Score: 5, Informative

    What makes you think the iPhone will run voice calls over IP? It's a traditional GSM phone that uses EDGE data to provide additional services including the visual voicemail. But calls go over the traditional cellular network just like any other phone.

    --
    LOAD "SIG",8,1
    LOADING...
    READY.
    RUN
  7. Ah ha! by Valdrax · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If the phone calls will be running on voIP, which is *data*, then technically there should be no monthly limit on minutes. Who wants to be the first to try this out?

    I think you may have just hit on the very reason why Apple isn't supporting 3rd party apps. I'll bet the deal with AT&T had some sort of language to prevent this very thing since many of the iPhone's coolest features require a lot of data access. Since non-unlimited data plans are nightmarishly expensive if you're a heavy web user (like I am), it seems almost a prerequisite that iPhone plans come with unlimited data.

    Naturally, this opens up the very possibility you just mentioned, so both AT&T and Apple are probably very keen on making sure that it doesn't happen. Hence, no iPhone SDK for 3rd parties. All the bluster about controlling the experience is probably just that -- bluster meant to distract from the real issue.

    Why else would Apple cripple a brand new platform that could fuel a rush of developers for them except to appease AT&T?

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:Ah ha! by rcs1000 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Its actually for the reasons that they stated. I know the Slashdot set is rife with conspiracy theories but Apple and AT&T simply want to avoid the nightmare that other phones cause, such as Treos and WMobile devices of being returned when the user installs some instable 3rd party app and of course they go home and reload everything that was on the first phone onto the second phone causing another return, repeat repeat repeat.

      Wow: nice conspiracy theory. According to Merrill Lynch, return rates at HTC (the world's largest maker of Windows Mobile phone) at 2.2%, against an industry average of 3%. So, those "nightmare" return rates are... made up.

      --
      --- My dad's political betting
    2. Re:Ah ha! by Chuqmystr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think you may have just hit on the very reason why Apple isn't supporting 3rd party apps. I'll bet the deal with AT&T had some sort of language to prevent this very thing since many of the iPhone's coolest features require a lot of data access.

      Indeed. Having worked in wireless myself, down in the customer support trenches, I can tell you that most carriers rue the dawn of Treo's and Win smartphones and such. If they could take it all back without blatantly appearing to be the complete and utter bastards what that they are then they certainly would faster than a 10khz tone drops an old fashion amps call.

      Enter his Steveness wielding the iPhone. It does a few nifty tricks heretofore unseen from cellphones and oh, look, it's an iPod too. "Smartphone schmartphone" sez AT&T execs, "it's an iPhone and that's different. Make Mr. Jobs tweak the reality distortion field to our liking. He will acquiesce if he wants his precious to ever touch a network like ours, Muwahahaha!" Making a deal with a carrier is akin to making a deal with the dark one himself. I'd not be surprised if the iPhone has shed features along the way, features some of us have been bitching for. I've seen this first hand many times. Think Motorola and Verizon for example. Or Nokia and most any US carrier. And need I remind you how supposedly Jobs had approached VZW first who then sent him packing? It's my observation that most of us will never again see the day of newer "smart" phones getting to market 100% unmolested and in their original state as intended by the manufacturers.

  8. Re IPhone by anand78 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Last phone I bought was a Treo 650, thnking that I will be using the applications. A year later I use my phone for " Making phone calls".

  9. Re:SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER? WTF? by k_187 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I believe that's for the credit check they run on you. Thus, the proper anger should be about why the phone company needs to run a credit check on you and/or why a social security number is required to do so.

    --
    11 was a racehorse
    12 was 12
    1111 Race
    12112
  10. 2nd gen? -- rubbish by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 5, Funny

    Everyone knows that the 3rd gen will have a ball massager and and a cheek flosser. However, I am really stoked for the 4th gen which will cut the price of the phone to .25 of its original price, as Apple always does.
    According to the rumor mills, the 4th gen may also come in watermellon red, which as far as I'm concerned is the color of Kings.

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
  11. 74GB capacity? by berj · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Did anyone else notice this screenshot in the video?

    http://bayimg.com/LAcLFaabd

    It shows an iPhone with 75GB of storage. Earlier in the video they show the storage as 8GB.

    Any speculation as to a hard drive version becoming available sometime soon?

  12. Re:Who came up with these prices? by CavemanKiwi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Problem is you are using a check list style comparison. While sometimes these are useful let clearly indicate a case when they are not.

    Bentley Vs My Car (VW Passat)

    Both have 4 doors. Tie
    Both Seat 5 People. Tie
    Both drive on the same roads and get the passengers from A to B. Tie
    Fuel Consumption. My car is better. Win my car
    Price. My car is about 1/10th the price. Win my car
    Speed, the Bentley is faster although given both a limited most of the time by the law and traffic conditions. Just win for the Bentley
    Space. Win Bentley
    Insurance cost. Win my car.

    So is my car better then a Bentley. Nope although it is better value then a Bentley. It also doesn't go into all the little detail that make a Bentley better quality of finish etc. just like you fail to mention the experience of using the iPhone.