Slashdot Mirror


Slashdot: Podcasts, IM, Improved Discussions

We have a number of Slashdot features that we've added in recent months that I've neglected to mention so I wanted to take a moment to share them with everyone today. I'd like to start by reminding all logged in users to try playing with our new experimental Discussion2 system. It's very nearly complete at this point. You can activate it with a checkbox on any article page (provided you actually have logged in). Read on to learn about Podcasts, IM, improved quoting in discussions, new subscriber options and more.

Recently we added the ability to receive AIM instant messages to notify you when stories are posted, when someone posts a comment to your journal, or when one of your friends post a journal. You can turn it on from the messaging preference page. You might need to set up slashdotomatic as a friend or buddy or whatever in your IM client to make it work, but this is a good way to get fast notification of Slashdot stuffs. We hopefully will add other popular instant messaging clients in the future but for now AIM is the top dog so we started there. The code is of course all in CVS if you want to add new platforms... there's room to easily add Jabber, MSN, Yahoo or anything else really. We've talked about SMS as well, so if there's a demand for it we'll work on it.

Everyone who knows me knows what I think about the vast majority of podcasts on the internet. The Slashdot podcast currently isn't at all like that. We call it the the Slashdot Robot Overlord. All it does is use Cepstral Voices to read you Slashdot stories aloud. So if you want to listen to Slashdot stories in your car or on your phone or something, here's an easy way to do it.

Subscribers have a new option in their journals: they can restrict the discussions to logged in users. This is a nice way to minimize trolling and general crappy behavior in your journal. Of course, there's nothing to stop the ambitious jerk from creating a user account, but this will at least slow them down for a few seconds. It's worth noting that when you post a journal, you are given the option to submit your journal to Slashdot... if your journal is selected, you sacrifice that option.

Speaking of comment posting, we've added a new <quote> tag useful in comments. If you choose to encapsulate a quote in said tag, that quote is expandable and contractible via user preferences. Properly quoting comments will allow your fellow readers to have better control over their display than simply blocking a huge chunk of words in italics.

A little bit more information about the Discussion2 system before we wrap up: It's currently tested mostly under Firefox (as is all of our javascript). It also works fine under Safari (2 and 3). We have some UI improvements coming soon as well, but it already is a vast improvement over the old system. One of the next steps is to make D2 degrade cleanly to a non-javascript browser so we can maintain one code base for development. When we get to that point, we can switch over the default/anonymous view to the new system.

We have a bunch of other stuff coming after the holiday. But in the mean time, please test this stuff out and let me know if you see any glaring bugs. The address is the same as always.

248 comments

  1. Buggy IE (7) by duerra · · Score: 5, Informative

    I realize that this doesn't matter to a lot of the Slashdot crowd, but Discussion2 is still buggy in IE (IE7, specifically). There are JS errors on the page, the weird gray and white floating box that sits on the page which is apparently there to tell you how many posts there are in the discussion overruns the left-side navigation bar (and overall who's purpose seems a bit pointless to me in general), and its rendering is completely messed up in IE. Also, I have to use FF just to disable Discussion2 on my account, because it doesn't work in IE7.

    You may want to get those issues cleared up before you consider Discussion2 complete.

    1. Re:Buggy IE (7) by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      The floating box has sliders on it which you can pull to adjust the number of comments that are hidden, closed, and fully displayed. If I pull the top slider/tab up, I will move my fully displayed comments threshold up by +1. The bottom controls the closed comments threshold.

    2. Re:Buggy IE (7) by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's also buggy in older versions of Seamonkey (Mozilla Application Suite). The grey bar at the top apears, but looks shorter than normal and doesn't have any text.

      Also, the AJAX stuff sometimes doesn't work right, even on Firefox. For instance, 'hidden comments' that are below the moderation threshhold don't always display when viewing a particular message. This behavior persists on all browsers I have tried.

    3. Re:Buggy IE (7) by brunascle · · Score: 1

      I realize that this doesn't matter to a lot of the Slashdot crowd, but IE (IE7, specifically) is still buggy in Discussion2.
      teehee, fun fun.
    4. Re:Buggy IE (7) by deniable · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You say that like it's a bad thing.

    5. Re:Buggy IE (7) by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 5, Funny

      I realize that this doesn't matter to a lot of the Slashdot crowd, but the Internet is still buggy in IE (IE7, specifically). Fixed that for you.
    6. Re:Buggy IE (7) by garcia · · Score: 1

      I realize that this doesn't matter to a lot of the Slashdot crowd, but Discussion2 is still buggy in IE (IE7, specifically).

      I ignore it because it doesn't display the messages as I have them set in my preferences. I assumed that they should take my preferences and then display the same way as the old system but apparently they don't.

    7. Re:Buggy IE (7) by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Re:Buggy IE (7) (Score:1)
      by rustalot42684 (1055008) Alter Relationship on 11:34 Wednesday 27 June 2007 (#19663739)

      IE7 doesn't work on Linux. Slashdot users are all communists, so none of them would be using it. Uh..."Greetings, comrade"?
    8. Re:Buggy IE (7) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That's not a bug, it's a feature.

    9. Re:Buggy IE (7) by clang_jangle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You might want to switch to a more standards-compliant browser then...

      --
      Caveat Utilitor
    10. Re:Buggy IE (7) by Ilgaz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I realize that this doesn't matter to a lot of the Slashdot crowd, but Discussion2 is still buggy in IE (IE7, specifically). ..//..
      You may want to get those issues cleared up before you consider Discussion2 complete. If you had access to Slashdot's web stats, you would fall from chair no less.

      Hint: Top browser could not be Firefox. There is no such guarantee.

      It happens because of people checking Slashdot at work or plainly choosing IE 7 (which is not a crime).
    11. Re:Buggy IE (7) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sure it's discussion 2 that's buggy and not your browser of choice?

    12. Re:Buggy IE (7) by mattatwork · · Score: 1

      What about WINE? Not that you would want to, but there's always the possiblity....

      --
      I've refrained from profanity, racial/ethnic epitaphs and am 5'11" - how can I be ranked as troll?
    13. Re:Buggy IE (7) by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      For those of us that are required to run IE7 at work it is...now I have to go to fark or *shudder* digg to slack off.

    14. Re:Buggy IE (7) by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      The funniest thing is, I get pretty much exactly those problems in Firefox (2.0.0.4).

    15. Re:Buggy IE (7) by Control+Group · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't worry, it's a problem in IE6, too. The page is completely unreadable. Pieces of interface pop in and out as I scroll up and down the page, I only know about the controls on the left-hand side by rumor; I can't actually see anything helpful over there, comments overlap each other (by which I mean text is actually laid atop other text such that neither block is readable), and it takes comparatively longer to load.

      I'm hoping there's an option similar to the old "light" mode for those of us often stuck using IE. I can understand if the nifty bells and whistles don't get made IE-compatible in favor of actual standards, but if I can't read slashdot at all when I'm forced to use IE (like at work, for example), I'm going to be a sad panda.

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    16. Re:Buggy IE (7) by clang_jangle · · Score: 1

      Well it isn't terribly Politically Correct of me I suppose but I like Opera best in part because it is the most standards-compliant browser (AFAIK).
      Firefox is trying so hard to replace IE functionality specifically that IMO it naturally will tend to have similar problems.
      And that's the problem with MS co-opting and polluting standards and why that should be illegal...

      --
      Caveat Utilitor
    17. Re:Buggy IE (7) by ksd1337 · · Score: 1

      you would fall from chair no less You could be falling off the chair because Monkeyboy is trying to throw it across the room.
    18. Re:Buggy IE (7) by BobPaul · · Score: 1

      Portible Firefox? That's always worked for me...

    19. Re:Buggy IE (7) by r00t · · Score: 1

      It happens because of people checking Slashdot at work or plainly choosing IE 7 (which is not a crime). Hey, we could fix that. Write to your representatives!

    20. Re:Buggy IE (7) by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      I've been using IE7 since its beta days when Vista was too buggy for day-to-day use (though back then I was so fed up with XP I ran Linux almost exclusively) and I'm not sure what your issues are. Yes, the white/gray/darkgray box that should be on the far left floats out a bit, and every now and then text from one comment will overlay another incorrectly, but the first isn't a real problem and the latter can usually be corrected by resizing the window even slightly, which will cause IE to re-position everything (usually correctly). The D2 checkbox is not only clearly visible and functional, I turned it on using IE7 and I have, in the past, temporarily turned it off the same way.

      My biggest complaints are the render time (IE's JS engine certainly isn't the fastest out there, though it renders static HTML fast enough according to tests) and the tendency to, when expanding a partially-hidden discussion, scroll halfway down the page for some reason. That is the worst bug, and even then it's hardly that terrible; when using Slashdot on IE7 I just note where the slider is before clicking any such expand link.

      It has been explained elsewhere, but the box on the upper left is D2's equivilent of threshold controls. The top slider controls how much is fully visible: drag it to the bottom to show all comments in full, or to near the top to only automatically expand those that are highly modded. The lower slider controls how much is hidden as just "X hidden comments" links; for moderating I keep it at the far bottom but moving it up a notch or two will hide the stuff that got modded down (or started there, I apply an automatic downmod to ACs). The in-between (the light gray region) represents comments that will be abbreviated as a subject, score, username, and the first line of the comment. This is similar to the comments that fall above your threshhold but below your "always expand comments scoring above X" setting in the old system. The nice thing with the slider box is that it can be adjusted on a page-by-page basis, at any time, with decently fine control. I estimate it takes about 1 second per 100 comments for IE7 to re-render after moving the slider on a 1.8GHz machine. It's not great but it is certainly usable.

      A final note: both D2 and IE7 have seen improvements over the last 9 months, so you might want to try again. It used to be a LOT worse... these days it's tolerable, though Firefox/Konqueror are much better. I just realized I've never tried in Linux.

      Do NOT attempt to use D2 in either Lynx or Links. :-)

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
  2. Testing Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Speaking of comment posting, we've added a new quote tag useful in comments. If you choose to encapsulate a quote in said tag, that quote is expandable and contractible via user preferences. Properly quoting comments will allow your fellow readers to have better control over their display than simply blocking a huge chunk of words in italics. How is this different from the old blockquote (below)?

    This is a blockquote test.
    So the difference is a preference the user can set?
    1. Re:Testing Quote by eln · · Score: 1

      The difference is that the "quote" tag uses a stylesheet so it's *cooler*. Using boring old HTML when you could be using CSS is sooooo 20th century.

    2. Re:Testing Quote by Qzukk · · Score: 3, Informative

      So the difference is a preference the user can set?

      My guess is that it's a preference I can set to decide how I want to see your post.

      That's my guess anyway, since apparently when I signed up for the University of Michigan testing stuff it clobbered my account profile with whatever was going on at the time and now none of this "discussion2" stuff works. I don't even get this "checkbox on any article page". I can turn on and off the Michigan stuff in my profile, but the majority of the time it wouldn't work in FF or IE, and I ended up leaving it disabled.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    3. Re:Testing Quote by brunascle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      well, they couldve kept the blockquote tag and just added css to it. this is what blockquote was meant for. div is meaningless, and shouldnt be used in place of blockquote.

    4. Re:Testing Quote by wile_e_wonka · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I don't see any difference. I thought he said there would be something to click on to make it collapse. Maybe it's because I'm using Opera.

    5. Re:Testing Quote by _xeno_ · · Score: 1

      Yep, same here. Agreed to do the University of Michigan testing, and I don't get a Discussion2 checkbox. Since the University of Michigan Testing system basically made Slashdot unreadable thanks to how slow it ran, I have to leave it disabled.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    6. Re:Testing Quote by brunascle · · Score: 1

      i cant even find the option in preferences. anyone?

    7. Re:Testing Quote by fimbulvetr · · Score: 1

      Count me in on this. I couldn't figure out where this "Discussion2" checkbox was.

      Same with UMT, I shut it off almost immediately due to massive overhead it imposed on loading pages. I can't figure out how someone found that to be acceptable.

    8. Re:Testing Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMFGWTFBBQ ME TOO LOL !!1112!11!121

      Here's a random silly thought. How about instead of repeating the same damned thing idiot #1 said, you realize:

      1) The University of Michigan thing IS Discussion2. Moron.

      And:

      2) FAQ: I have found a bug on Slashdot, Who do I contact?

      OR try emailing one of the authors.

      OR try growing up and reenabling the UM thing so you can have the same pointless JavaScript enabled forum everyone else can.

    9. Re:Testing Quote by kebes · · Score: 2, Informative

      It appears that there are many of us experiencing this "University of Michigan Testing" bug. By having agreed to test that system, now we can't see/use the Discussion2 system.

      I suppose it's possible that the two systems are the same thing, but based on the few screenshots I've been able to find of Discussion2, it doesn't look like they are. Moreover the University of Michigan system is very slow and buggy--I have trouble believing this is the same interface everyone else is testing. (Maybe a precursor to it, though.)

      This is obviously a bug, and it would be nice if someone would mod up one of these comments so that the coders are aware of the problem. (In addition to the bug report that we should file...)

    10. Re:Testing Quote by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is a blockquote.

      This is a blockquote with italics.

      This is a quote.

      This is a quote with italics.

      Hey, they've fixed at least one bug! :-)

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    11. Re:Testing Quote by kebes · · Score: 3, Informative

      In addition to the bug report that we should file...
      A bug report is now filed in the Sourceforge bug-tracker. Hopefully this is a simple, quick fix... I'd love to be able to experience this "Discussion2" thing that everyone is talking about!
    12. Re:Testing Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, alternatively, you could just - and I know this may come as a shock - CREATE A NEW ACCOUNT!

      Problem solved. You get to experience beta code with the rest of them.

      Really, which is easier: whining to everyone on Slashdot over a missing checkbox, or just sucking it up and solving the problem yourself!?

    13. Re:Testing Quote by orclevegam · · Score: 1

      I thought he said there would be something to click on to make it collapse.

      i cant even find the option in preferences. anyone?

      Initially this confused me as well, but the way to get a comment to collapse and expand is to click its name (thought he said about quotes, but not seeing that behavior). It used to be this linked to just that comment, but with this new system you can browse at a higher level and selectively check individual comments pretty easy. On the other hand, if an entire thread is collapsed and you want to read all of it you need to individually click each header.

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    14. Re:Testing Quote by n0084ever · · Score: 1

      yeah, and as a feature of your new account, you get to have a tremendously high uid, like mine!!!

    15. Re:Testing Quote by 6Yankee · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is a blockquote.

      This is a blockquote with italics.

      This is a quote.

      This is a quote with italics. This is your brain on drugs. Any questions?
    16. Re:Testing Quote by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Hey, they've fixed at least one bug! :-)

      Negative. They did not fix the bug, they provided a workaround.

      Actually, intelligently styling the <blockquote> tag would have been much better than defining their own <quote> tag, especially since there are already two tags meant for quoting; blockquote quotes blocks (like paragraphs) and <q> (note: not an allowed tag here on slashdot) quotes inline content (some text inside a paragraph, for example. So instead of fixing the problem, they did something else stupid.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    17. Re:Testing Quote by FireFury03 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      well, they couldve kept the blockquote tag and just added css to it. this is what blockquote was meant for. div is meaningless, and shouldnt be used in place of blockquote. Meh, typing "blockquote" or "quote" instead of "i" is effort - they should've just used the "q" tag...
    18. Re:Testing Quote by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, yeah, I know. The HTML generated by the new quote tags is pretty daft as well. But at least it doesn't ignore my explicit formatting as blockquote does!

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    19. Re:Testing Quote by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      apparently when I signed up for the University of Michigan testing stuff it clobbered my account profile with whatever was going on at the time and now none of this "discussion2" stuff works
      Ah, so that's my problem! Last time I volunteer to be a beta tester...

      I've had the University of Michigan stuff turned off for ages too - it simply doesn't work properly, and is quite stunningly slow once the comment count gets over a couple of hundred (and this is on a X2 4400+ with 2GB of RAM...). I was wondering where the discussion 2 checkbox was; I don't get it either.

      Oh well, guess I'll be sticking with the Slashdotter extension for a while yet then.
    20. Re:Testing Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, so that's my problem! Last time I volunteer to be a beta tester... He whines, complaining about missing out on the opportunity to be a beta tester...
    21. Re:Testing Quote by Bent+Mind · · Score: 1

      When used in conjunction with the discussion2 system, anything in quote tags is omitted from the message summery. This way you can tell at a glance what the message is saying, rather then what they are replying to. This is a very nice feature.

      --
      Request a Linux Shockwave player here: http://www.macromedia.com/support/email/wishform/
    22. Re:Testing Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whines the AC who has nothing better to do than whine about other people whining. Can't even bother to actually read what he's whining about, can you? Or are you just that dense?

      By "whining" about it in public, we've figured out that this is actually a bug in the system and not some fuckup in our browser causing us to keep trying to pull the scripts off of the slow-as-dirt UoM website which hasn't updated in a year now. You can take your shitty attitude about the new discussion system and shove it as well, maybe I like being able to see the entire discussion on one screen without having to move back and forth from page to page to keep track of the discussion and I'm willing to sacrifice some CPU time to the javascript gods to do it.

    23. Re:Testing Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So create a new account and enjoy Discussion2. Seriously, this is easily worked around by people willing to spend the 3 seconds required to do so, rather than the five minutes required to get all worked up about it.

      Wait, except you're apparently not willing to use JavaScript to do so. So what do you care? You can't use Discussion2 anyway.

      Suck it up and continue reading Slashdot like always.

      By "whining" about it in public, we've figured out that this is actually a bug in the system and not some fuckup in our browser

      Actually, you haven't. You won't until you pull up Slashcode and point to the line where the supposed bug is. Until then, you're just whining about nothing.

    24. Re:Testing Quote by mkraft · · Score: 1

      I've got the same problem. No option for Discussion2.

    25. Re:Testing Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, except you're apparently not willing to use JavaScript to do so. So what do you care? You can't use Discussion2 anyway. So of the two choices, you seem to have chosen "too stupid to read the fucking post." I'm more than happy to use the Javascript, not that you appear to be capable of understanding that even when I expressly stated so.

      You won't until you pull up Slashcode and point to the line where the supposed bug is. Until then, you're just whining about nothing. So bug reports have to come with filenames and line numbers now? I wonder how that works for proprietary code? I think the fact that the issue is reproducible over several users indicates that a bug exists. You came up with a work around, but that doesn't change the fact that the bug exists.

      How about I pull up the html and point to where the problem is:
      <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="screen, projection" href="http://socialcomputingresearch.net/slashdot/ slashdot/umich.css?T_2_5_0_163"> Or maybe it's <script src="http://socialcomputingresearch.net/slashdot/j s/comments.js?T_2_5_0_163" type="text/javascript"> Last time I checked, this site's domain was spelled differently and ended in something like .org.

      But hey, what do I know? Maybe slashdot quit hosting its own stylesheet and code, maybe that's been outsourced. Maybe someone over at UoM has been keeping the code up to date with whatever changes slashdot made since the end of the beta test and it's not actually a problem despite the fact that I've had trouble reaching the socialcomputingresearch.net host in the past, and when its unreachable, I have to disable it in my preferences since the advertised checkbox doesn't appear to let me turn it on or off on a per-story basis.
    26. Re:Testing Quote by mkraft · · Score: 2, Informative

      I found a way to enable Discussions2 if you previously signed up for the Univ of Michigan testing, but it isn't straight forward.

      There are two ways to do it.

      1. If you are using Firefox, you can install the Firebug Addon and then go to the comments preference page and click on the firebug icon in the status bar. Then click "Inspect" Firebug button and click on the "University of Michigan Testing" button and click on the HTML tab in Firebug. Change the value from "uofm" to "slashdot". Then make sure the "University of Michigan Testing" is selected and submit the page.

      2. If you can't or won't use Firebug, you can do it manually by going to the comment page and saving the page on to your computer and editing the HTML to change the "uofm" value to "slashdot" and then change the submit URL from "/users.pl" to "http://slashdot.org/users.pl". Then open this page in your browser and select the "University of Michigan Testing" style option and submit the page.

      Either way, if you did it correctly, then neither option under "Discussion Style" will be checked and you will be using the new Discussion2 style. You can then use the Discussion2 style without having to wait for a fix.

    27. Re:Testing Quote by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      Haha wow, thanks. Firebug fixed it.

      As for option 2, I tried that first since I didn't have Firebug installed, and it appears that slahdot does some kind of referrer checking, which is probably a very good thing ;)

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    28. Re:Testing Quote by mkraft · · Score: 1

      It's not a referrer check, but a form of id check to make sure you loaded the page first. If you load the comment preference page and save it and then with the page still open, edit the saved page open it in a new tab and the submit it, it will work. But basically you have to go the the preference page and save it, every time you want to do the trick, you can't just keep reusing the old saved page.

    29. Re:Testing Quote by brunascle · · Score: 1
      i was referring to the HTML that slashdot creates on the actual site, not what you type.
      or even [q], whatever, as long as the article.pl page translates that to a
      tag.
  3. Clogs up in Opera 9 by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 5, Informative

    Ive' noticed that Discussion2 tends to make Opera 9 chug on large comment pages (usally past 200

    --
    "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
    1. Re:Clogs up in Opera 9 by Anonymous+Monkey · · Score: 1

      Firefox 2.0 dose the same thing, but it only happens to me above the 350 point.

      --
      We are the Borg...
    2. Re:Clogs up in Opera 9 by ball-lightning · · Score: 1

      Yea, we don't *all* use Firefox... In my personal experience, every time I enable Discussion2 Opera gets very, very unhappy. Hopefully, /. will allow us to switch to the old Discussion system, even after Discussion2 is finished.

    3. Re:Clogs up in Opera 9 by john83 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ive' noticed that Discussion2 tends to make Opera 9 chug on large comment pages (usally past 200 I'm running Firefox 2.0.0.4 and get the same problem.
      --
      Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    4. Re:Clogs up in Opera 9 by theantipop · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ive' noticed that Discussion2 tends to make Opera 9 chug on large comment pages (usally past 200 I have this problem as well. It is horridly slow on any popular story to the point where it takes 4-5 seconds for the browser to respond to a PageDwn. Often times expanding a minimized comment will seem to time out. I switched back to FF2 and it's silky smooth.
    5. Re:Clogs up in Opera 9 by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Okay I have to as where is this check box to turn this new feature?
      I have never seen it.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    6. Re:Clogs up in Opera 9 by theantipop · · Score: 1

      I have no problems in FF2 (currently 2.04 with TMP and ABP installed). I've been using Discussion 2.0 for a while and Opera 9 is the only browser I've seen slowness with (IE6,7 and FF1.5, 2.0 all fine for me).

    7. Re:Clogs up in Opera 9 by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Look just above the comment prefs box at the top of every article. (Just below the summary, above the comments themselves.) There should be a small checkbox on the right side of the dark gray area that says, "I am willing to help test Slashdot's New Discussion System." Checking it activates the discussion system of DOOM. Unchecking it brings you the DOOM and GLOOM that we're all familiar with.

    8. Re:Clogs up in Opera 9 by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Hopefully, /. will allow us to switch to the old Discussion system, even after Discussion2 is finished.

      Provided they make it degrade properly with no javascript, as the taco says, you should be able to just disable javascript on slashdot.org in order to get a plain system.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Clogs up in Opera 9 by Ilgaz · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ive' noticed that Discussion2 tends to make Opera 9 chug on large comment pages (usally past 200 It _is_ Opera bug which people like me spent very huge time to report to Opera ASA.

      I even included OS X "sample of application", my logs, my system profile just to make them interested a bit. While guys start the day by checking Slashdot there, they don't fix the freaking bug.

      Unbelievable, no less.

      I hate to give ammo to Opera haters but this is it, I am saying this public. That is a Opera bug which exists since first 9.x versions and lives up to date despite numerous kind of bug reports even posted to their forums.

      Original Slasdot bug report (not mine)
      http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=deta il&aid=1541019&group_id=4421&atid=104421

      By risking CmdrTaco getting mad at me :) I added comment to closed bug even to help Opera people if they ever check one of World's popular Tech sites bug database.
    10. Re:Clogs up in Opera 9 by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Look just above the comment prefs box at the top of every article. (Just below the summary, above the comments themselves.)

      When I look there, I have only one checkbox, for saving my threshold and such. I looked in prefs, all I have is a radio button (on the 'Comments' page) where I can switch between "Normal" and "University of Michigan Testing", is that the same thing?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:Clogs up in Opera 9 by Alioth · · Score: 1

      If discussion 2 is related in any way to their University of (I forget where it was) experimental Slashdot discussion interface, I ended up turning it off because it was molasses slow. They then made an improvement to it, but after another week of testing it, I turned it off again because any large discussion was unusably slow.

    12. Re:Clogs up in Opera 9 by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I get the exact same thing. I thought I was going nuts.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    13. Re:Clogs up in Opera 9 by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      Firefox 2.0 dose the same thing, but it only happens to me above the 350 point. Slashdot accidentally invented World's most evil Javascript benchmark/bug check? Sorry couldn't stand :)

      Which browser works fine with that feature on? I really started to wonder.
    14. Re:Clogs up in Opera 9 by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      When I look there, I have only one checkbox, for saving my threshold and such.

      It should be right above that, in the dark gray area. Though it sounds like people with the Michigan Testing gizmo don't have it.
    15. Re:Clogs up in Opera 9 by junglee_iitk · · Score: 1

      For those who don't know, TMP is short form of Tampon for memory leaks.

    16. Re:Clogs up in Opera 9 by b0r1s · · Score: 1

      Too much JS will break any browser. IE dies around the 300 comment mark for me (with 512M of memory on this particular machine, may be better for better equpped PCs)

      --
      Mooniacs for iOS and Android
    17. Re:Clogs up in Opera 9 by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I get random crashes on FireFox 2 anyways. Maybe it isn't the page but something with the browser.

      But I don't pussy foot around, I usually have the or for browser windows open with 10 to 15 pages in each window. It sounds like the overhead of the discussion 2 system to me with all the JS and all. I don't have that issue with FireFox 1.x, just 2.x.

    18. Re:Clogs up in Opera 9 by clang_jangle · · Score: 1

      Seems to work just fine for me so far in Opera 9.20 on OS X.

      --
      Caveat Utilitor
    19. Re:Clogs up in Opera 9 by Etherized · · Score: 1

      It destroys Opera (8.5, apparently) on my n800, to the point that the site is pretty much unusable once I try to load a story. I much prefer Discussion2 in general, but I hope there continues to be a way to disable it if there's no way to work around the Opera issues.

    20. Re:Clogs up in Opera 9 by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The dark grey area contains only "Slashdot: Podcasts, IM, Improved Discussions | Preferences | Top | 155 comments | Search Discussion" and nothing else. So I can confirm that I have the umich testing gizmo, and don't have the checkbox. Slashcode FTW!

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    21. Re:Clogs up in Opera 9 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      buy a faster machine and quit whining, you cheap bastard!

    22. Re:Clogs up in Opera 9 by porneL · · Score: 1

      I hate to give ammo to Opera haters but this is it, I am saying this public. That is a Opera bug which exists since first 9.x versions and lives up to date despite numerous kind of bug reports even posted to their forums.

      You should be aware that Opera is working on a new "Kestrel" branch, so fixing it in soon-to-be-dead 9.0 branch would be waste of their time.
      Unfortunately you'll probably have to hold on until they release next major version (which with complete CSS3 selectors, text-shadow and native QT4 and OS X UIs seems worth the wait).

      (BTW: pretty much the same story is with Firefox 1-2 vs Firefox 3)

    23. Re:Clogs up in Opera 9 by Coldmoon · · Score: 1

      Also happens with K-Melion and FireFox here. Even the main page s extremely slow. It took me a sec to check the box and 2 minutes to get to a point where I could turn it back off. Needs some more work...

      --
      Coldmoon over Dark water...
    24. Re:Clogs up in Opera 9 by Bent+Mind · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what the message count is, seems to show up around 500. However, I also have this problem in Firefox 2.0.0.4 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.4) Gecko/20070613 Firefox/2.0.0.4). I've also noticed that message summaries don't expand well if there are a lot of messages.

      --
      Request a Linux Shockwave player here: http://www.macromedia.com/support/email/wishform/
    25. Re:Clogs up in Opera 9 by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      But this is Slashdot, one of the World's most popular IT sites (and respected), not someones personal hand made blog or myspace page.

      I am tired of defending them since 3.6. Check the page I referenced, I have even put my Opera bug ID there. Nobody returned. That is the second bug report ID, there is 1 more.

      I don't say Firefox development team would give up everything at hand and start fixing it but at least you would see/hear something.

      They forget that I am NOT a Opera shareholder, not a developer, not owner of Slashdot nor some advertiser. I am giving my time free to make full bug reports along with every kind of possible information. In fact, thanks to their ignore of OS X keychain, I rarely use Opera (400 passwords here). As ex Windows customer of them, I am sparing my time to make favor and I am sure there are others reported it.

    26. Re:Clogs up in Opera 9 by robaal · · Score: 1

      I usually have the or for browser windows open My on FF window can eat up ~300MB, so I can't imagine using more than to windows.
  4. Re: Slashdotomatic's Buddy Icon by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 1

    You might want to give Slashdotomatic a more relevant buddy icon as well.

    --
    "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
  5. Perfect Chance by endianx · · Score: 1

    This seems like the perfect chance to ask a question I've had for a while, that would have been off-topic anywhere else. If I have questions about Slashdot, such as "What does that No Karma Bonus checkbox do?", where should I ask them? Are there forums somewhere for Slashdot readers?

    1. Re:Perfect Chance by trip11 · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you have accumulated a large amount of karma (your posts are regularly moderated up, no down), then your posts will start with a rating of 2, not 1. You can choose to not apply that bonus if you don't think you want it (for instance if you think your comment will just get moderated down). It's all in the FAQ too. Spelled out much clearer. http://slashdot.org/faq/com-mod.shtml#cm800

    2. Re:Perfect Chance by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      If I have questions about Slashdot, such as "What does that No Karma Bonus checkbox do?", where should I ask them?

      I just ask in an addendum to my post. Always worked for me.

      BTW, "No Karma Bonus" turns off your extra "bonus" point for having good karma. Thus checking that box would make your post show up as +1 rather than +2. It used to be more useful when only a handful of posters had it, but now all it takes is to hang around long enough and you'll get the +1 bonus. Sooo, you can mostly ignore it if you wish. I still use the checkbox when I'm saying something that I don't want to stand out (e.g. replying "Good catch!" to someone) and yet don't want to make a signed AC post for.
    3. Re:Perfect Chance by Cerberus7 · · Score: 3, Funny

      You're doing it wrong! You're supposed to be a jerk and say "Murk LOAR!"

      --
      I don't know about you, but my servers run on the power of cotton candy and happy thoughts. -Anonymous Coward
    4. Re:Perfect Chance by orclevegam · · Score: 1

      You seem to have your forums confused, that's probably more of a 4chan thing. Over here the better response might be either "You must be new here", or "RTFM".

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    5. Re:Perfect Chance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are there forums somewhere for Slashdot readers? Hilarious!

      By the way, try asking in the discussions attached to the polls. They're all stupid timewastes (even more so than normal), so a real question will probably get a response. And check the FAQ, naturally.

    6. Re:Perfect Chance by MontyApollo · · Score: 1

      I thought I have seen some posts with a starting score of 3. How does that work, or was I just imagining that?

    7. Re:Perfect Chance by spun · · Score: 4

      Probably someone modded it underrated. That will bump a comment up without giving a reason.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    8. Re:Perfect Chance by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      Funny thing you should mention that. I was messing around in my prefs page last week and I still couldn't figure out what half the settings do. Apart from the labels next to them, there's no documentation at all.

    9. Re:Perfect Chance by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      That or he has changed his personal modifiers on his settings page. I think friends/fans and good karma are set up a level by default. although it has been a while since I have played with mine.

    10. Re:Perfect Chance by MontyApollo · · Score: 1

      I believe you are correct. Someone thoughtfully moderated your post as underrated to demonstrate.

  6. Podcasts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was actually hoping the reference to 'podcasts' in the teaser would have to do with "Geeks in Space". It would be great to have new episodes of GiS, even if only once or twice a year.

    Obviously the participants have other projects and their own lives to live. I guess this is just a shout-out to let Rob et al. know that the show may be on hiatus but it is not forgotten by its fans.

    1. Re:Podcasts by zaffir · · Score: 1

      Agreed! Bring back Geeks in Space! Several years ago the reason for not continuing it was that it was too hard to get everyone together to record an episode. With apps like Skype and Ventrillo that's no longer an excuse.

      --
      "Upon attaching the waterblock to my penis, I began to notice that I know nothing about computers." -- JRockway
  7. IM re-queued or fallback to email? by tf23 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I asked this in IRC, but lately it doesn't seem anyone from the Slashdot SF.Inc's team is on there - if a user sets their msg prefs to IM, but they are not online at the time of the action, so the instant message cannot be sent at that time, what happens to it? Is it re-queued? For how long? Is there a fallback method such as email or web message if the IM can't be sent after X period of time? The last time I looked at the im_messages task code, I didn't see anything like that. But that was weeks ago, and I quickly skimmed it. So I might've missed quite a bit.

    1. Re:IM re-queued or fallback to email? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      What IM system is so backwards that it doesn't support offline delivery? ICQ could do this back in 1998, and it's been transparent in Jabber from the start.

      Also, is AIM really the 'top dog' for IM? I guess this must be a US thing; most of the geeks in my roster use Jabber, and the non-geeks use MSN, with a few non-geeks using Jabber now Google use it. I only have a couple of people using AIM or ICQ (which are the same network now).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:IM re-queued or fallback to email? by tf23 · · Score: 1

      What IM system is so backwards that it doesn't support offline delivery? I don't know. That's why I'm asking the question.

    3. Re:IM re-queued or fallback to email? by flakier · · Score: 1

      I think most people who use AIM know better than to trust it. IMO, they should have started with GTalk or Yahoo where offline messages are supported.

      So the hooks are in CVS...maybe someone will hop on it...

      --
      --
    4. Re:IM re-queued or fallback to email? by freemywrld · · Score: 1

      AIM supports offline delivery. You may need an updated client to take advantage of it, but the network does now support it.

    5. Re:IM re-queued or fallback to email? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which "updated" third party programs support it? (Does Pidgin?)

    6. Re:IM re-queued or fallback to email? by stinerman · · Score: 1

      Pidgin has support for "buddy pounces" which queue the message until the person you sent the message to connects to the network. This support is enabled under the "offline message emulation" plugin (as of 2.0.2).

    7. Re:IM re-queued or fallback to email? by Craig+Davison · · Score: 1

      MSN Messenger doesn't support offline messaging. It invites you to send your message to your buddy's email address.

    8. Re:IM re-queued or fallback to email? by Khuffie · · Score: 1

      MSN has added support for offline messaging since version 8, released pretty much this time last year. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Live_Messenge r#Final_Version_of_8.0

  8. Though I am banned from this paradise..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    may I be the first to welcome our new Slashdot Robot Overlord?

  9. AIM is Top Dog? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Funny

    We hopefully will add other popular instant messaging clients in the future but for now AIM is the top dog so we started there.

    For teenage girls, maybe. GTalk is "top dog" for professionals as it's built right into GMail. That, IMHO, is a much better solution than having to install 500+ IM products. And if I really need to contact a teenage girl^W^W^W someone on AIM, there's always Meebo!

    Disclaimer: The above is a humorous post and should not be consumed by old people, pregnant women, or those with a weak heart. AKAImBatman disclaims all responsibility for the reader's lack of a sense of humor.
    1. Re:AIM is Top Dog? by GiMP · · Score: 2, Informative

      Or how about XMPP in general? Thats IM for nerds, IM that matters.

    2. Re:AIM is Top Dog? by Alphager · · Score: 1

      Gmail for Proffessionals?! Professionals run their own damn servers with their own damn XMPP-implementation.

    3. Re:AIM is Top Dog? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I have to give a thumbs up to gtalk. It is the only IM I use daily. SMS would be nice as well.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    4. Re:AIM is Top Dog? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Professionals run their own damn servers with their own damn XMPP-implementation.

      If you don't have anything better to do than run your own email server, then you're not much of a professional. I think every professional has been there and done that, but the maintenance and time requirements are too demanding in the long-term. It's much easier to farm out your email and IM to a service like GMail, where you have a dedicated set of professionals ensuring that you have the latest upgrades, maximum performance, and best spam protection that our eggheads at large have managed to develop.

      That's not to say we don't use Exchange or Lotus Notes in our day jobs. (Though I often wish my company would just sign up for GMail for Domains.) However, all our IM activities and personal correspondence go through something much more streamlined, portable, and easy to use.
    5. Re:AIM is Top Dog? by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 5, Funny

      For teenage girls, maybe. I hate to break it to you, but those weren't really teenage girls.
    6. Re:AIM is Top Dog? by Hatta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Indeed, it's pretty lame for an open source site to promote closed source solutions like that. Any decent client can talk to all decent protocols, so there's really no excuse for not using Jabber.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    7. Re:AIM is Top Dog? by nick_davison · · Score: 1

      I hate to break it to you, but those weren't really teenage girls. Let us know how that defense holds up for you in court.
    8. Re:AIM is Top Dog? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's much easier to farm out your email and IM to a service like GMail, where you have a dedicated set of professionals ensuring that you have the latest upgrades, maximum performance, and best spam protection that our eggheads at large have managed to develop.

      If you're not worried about privacy, by all means, use google. If you are, don't. It's that simple.

      For most of my correspondence, I am not concerned about privacy, and I in fact use gmail, gtalk, etc. But for anything I am, I feel the need to have my own mail server.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:AIM is Top Dog? by spun · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What? What maintenance and time requirements? Setting up in house email and IM took me all of a day. I look at the servers all of five minutes a day. We're talking a simple in-house-only jabber IM server, and a postfix based store and forward only mail server for when the state screws up our statewide servers, but it is neither hard nor time consuming, and for some of us it's fun.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    10. Re:AIM is Top Dog? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well said!

            but was your comment encrypted?

                this one ain't,... i'm synonymous

    11. Re:AIM is Top Dog? by TheBig1 · · Score: 1

      If you're not worried about privacy, by all means, use google. If you are, don't. It's that simple.

      While this is true, there is obviously more to it than just that. If you are concerned about privacy, encrypt your emails, period. If you use a proper encryption scheme, then you don't have to worry about the mail provider, or anyone who happens to see the bytes as they flow down the wire, eavesdropping on you.

      If you are concerned about Google's (or other's) ability to store your email over a long term, and you feel that you can do better, *then* you have a justifiable need for your own mail server.

      Cheers

    12. Re:AIM is Top Dog? by stickystyle · · Score: 1

      And after I just spent 9 hours at the office looking over servers, the ABSOLUTE last thing I want to do is spend 5 more minutes when I get home. I defiantly enjoy my job and have fun doing it, but when I'm home I use a different definition of fun. You may want to revaluate your idea of fun before you burn-out.

      --
      Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate
    13. Re:AIM is Top Dog? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      I hate to break it to you, but those weren't really teenage girls.

      Maybe "he" is?

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    14. Re:AIM is Top Dog? by pla · · Score: 3, Funny

      I hate to break it to you, but those weren't really teenage girls.

      ...
      Sweet16Thing: Hey, weird, I work there too!
      Gary91 has joined the room
      Bunny15: Waitasec, guys - Do we have any non-cops in the PedoLovers chat room?
      GeezrLovr: Uh... Not me
      RoophieMe: Nope
      Nymph1993: Sorry
      Gary91 has logged off
      Bunny15: Oh, damn.

    15. Re:AIM is Top Dog? by matthewcraig · · Score: 1

      Agreed! What a turn of perspective from Slashdot.
      So, is this action an indication of a more general trend?
      Sorry, but it appears I left my mod points in my other jacket.

    16. Re:AIM is Top Dog? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have gtalk then you already have this functionality, use a jabber-rss service.

      http://dev.cmeerw.org/node/9
      http://dev.cmeerw.org/node/7

    17. Re:AIM is Top Dog? by fbjon · · Score: 1

      "I find people with dark suits and sunglasses highly attractive, your honor. How was I to know they weren't FBI agents?"

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    18. Re:AIM is Top Dog? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      those weren't really teenage girls

      No Kidding

    19. Re:AIM is Top Dog? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      >>>WARNING<<<
      It is dangerous to go into those chat rooms looking to fuck with the heads of FBI agents, just for fun. Because some of those "little girls" actually *are* little girls. And they will seriously fuck with *your* head. Just for fun.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  10. IM/SMS by garcia · · Score: 1

    I noticed the IM option in my profile the other day as I updated it and was glad you chose to not show that publicly. Thanks for that.

    Please also note that you can get Slashdot feeds via Slashdot on Twitter if you are in the need of SMS updates for the time being.

  11. Question for other slashdotters by truthsearch · · Score: 1

    Slashdot's comment features, while not perfect, set an example that thousands of other sites have followed. Do people think the new Discussion2 system will set a new example to be copied? Or is it turning into bloat?

    1. Re:Question for other slashdotters by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      I do have to admit that the system has improved greatly since I last tore it to shreds. Unfortunately, I still can't stomach it. The moment I turn it on, all the posts I want to read disappear. In order to get some semblance of a reasonable display, I have to drag all the comment preferences to the bottom of the slider-box, thus showing me a nested view of all posts. Which raises the question: why didn't I use the nested view in the first place?

      My feeling on the system is that the Slashdot editors are excited about the possibilities that DHTML & AJAX provide. Which is perfectly normal. Unfortunately, the simplest solution is sometimes still the best solution. Having a long page of nested comments allows me to read everything top to bottom very quickly while still keeping track of who's replying to whom. (Most of the time, anyway.) The only improvement I can see is to allow comments and their sub-threads to be collapsed. That would provide an easy way to mark a thread as having been read. (In case I lose my place on the page, for whatever reason.) But I don't see any real reason for AJAX as the content of the page greatly outweighs the size of its interface.

    2. Re:Question for other slashdotters by yog · · Score: 1

      Slashdot's comment features, while not perfect, set an example that thousands of other sites have followed. Do people think the new Discussion2 system will set a new example to be copied? Or is it turning into bloat? I like the new discussion system. It allows for faster skimming of the most highly moderated comments without the multiple page spillover stuff you have to go through with the old system. It's quite good for a nerdy site like /. I don't know if the broader online community is ready for it however; it's a bit sophisticated.
      --
      it's = "it is"; its = possessive. E.g., it's flapping its wings.
    3. Re:Question for other slashdotters by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      I agree. It's unfamiliar and, to be blunt, not done well enough or polished enough or even good looking enough for me to use it. I'm still on the old discussion system and I love it. The new one just doesn't cut it for me.

    4. Re:Question for other slashdotters by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      It definitely requires some tuning. I've found that my settings have settled down to a "hidden" threshold of -1, and an "abbreviated" threshold of 0. On the left-side gauge, this corresponds to having the bottom bar one notch above the bottom, and the top bar one notch farther up.

      Discussion2 is readable and entertaining. And I can even read those anonymous posts that aren't written like preschool books, thanks to the Abbreviated view.

      Discussion2's best feature, though, is that I can collapse and expand entire trees, in order to help keep track of what I've already read. (This is vital with all the recent 300+ comment stories.)

    5. Re:Question for other slashdotters by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The only improvement I can see is to allow comments and their sub-threads to be collapsed. That would provide an easy way to mark a thread as having been read.

      You also don't have to load comments until they are displayed, which can reduce page loads. And you don't have to reload a whole grip of comments from the db to display just one of them.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Question for other slashdotters by edmicman · · Score: 1

      I tried it for awhile, didn't like it, and turned it back. It was too....different. I felt like I was missing comments. For the time being, the Slashdotter Firefox plugin seems to work well for me. AJAX-fied collapsible comments, and some nice other features, too. It chokes sometimes on deeper level comments and the expanding, but for the most part it works very well.

    7. Re:Question for other slashdotters by jeffasselin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For the way I like to read Slashdot, it's perfect. I tend to read the 3-5 posts, but will often read the parents and replies of such posts even if they're 1-2 because they often progress the conversation starter that got modded up. It's also nice not to have to go back constantly in my browser, everything opens up in the single window, and the moderation is easy to do with the new system, you know exactly how many points you have left as you read on.

      --
      If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
    8. Re:Question for other slashdotters by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Web browser should have 'splittable' scroll bars like code editors and Excel have had for ages. Where you can split the window vertically into two panes, each with its own scrollbar. That would make reading a ton of websites, including Slashdot, much much more pleasant.

    9. Re:Question for other slashdotters by OzPixel · · Score: 1

      Web browser should have 'splittable' scroll bars like code editors and Excel have had for ages. Where you can split the window vertically into two panes, each with its own scrollbar. That would make reading a ton of websites, including Slashdot, much much more pleasant.

      But frames are so 1998 ...

  12. "restrict the discussions by wiredog · · Score: 2, Insightful
    to logged in users. This is a nice way to minimize trolling and general crappy behavior in your journal."

    Because that's worked so well over at Kuro5hin.

    1. Re:"restrict the discussions by deniable · · Score: 1

      It might be better to filter on age of account or total number of posts. Sort of like a cooling off period for sock puppets. Make the trolls work to be heard.

    2. Re:"restrict the discussions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kuro5hin's trolls are mentally ill. slashdot's are just kids with short attention spans.

    3. Re:"restrict the discussions by Ash+Vince · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Since you have a very low ID, you get this question:

      What constitutes a troll?

      I regularly post expressing my disagreement with american foreign policy and get modded as a troll. I know I hold alot of views that many US citizens disagree with, but does that make me a troll? What was the origin of the expression?

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    4. Re:"restrict the discussions by Red+Flayer · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Well, a previous responder took care of the deifnition for you... but just a thought on you getting moderated as a troll:

      Did you know that your sig states that you're here to offend people?

      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
      Reading that, I'm not sure if you mean to offend the ignorant, or if you offend people through your own ignorance. Either way, it seems like you purposely try to offend people, which is likely a very good reason to mod a potentially troll-ish post as a troll.
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    5. Re:"restrict the discussions by Alsee · · Score: 1

      In the strictest sense trolling is posting something you do not really mean, generally something horribly wrong or offensive, just for the fun of provoking people into replying against it. I don't much see the fun in it, but for some reason some people make a hobby of it. Deliberate troll posts often include something to tip off smart observant people that that is what is going on, letting them in on the gag/game. Your sig could easily be mistaken as that sort of tip-off of trolling, that you are reading/posting deliberately to "offend people" for fun. I suspect you will get modded troll less often if you change the sig.

      Troll can also be a rather vague term, and some people may mod a post as troll just because the post pisses them off for some reason. Such moderation is generally considered abusive, and whoever did it may get smacked down for it in meta-moderation. Posts may also be get modded troll for tossing around personal insults and general profanity and rudeness... "you're a fucking moron" type stuff.

      my disagreement with american foreign policy and get modded as a troll. I know I hold alot of views that many US citizens disagree with

      A lot of Americans also strongly disagree with American foreign policy, especially here on Slashdot :) Playing cheerleader for Bush probably draws more harsh moderation than almost anything else.

      I tried to look at at your post history, but I don't see anything modded troll in the last few weeks. Maybe you just have a gratuitously insulting style when arguing sometimes, or maybe you use flagrantly invalid arguments and have flagrantly invalid 'facts', or maybe you have good arguments and good facts that just really piss off the occasional jingoistic abusive moderator, or maybe you're just too sensitive the very rare and inevitable accidental/clueless/completely-random modderation, or most of all your sig may be misinterpreted as the deliberate red flag of a deliberate troll.

      If you cite specific posts that got modded troll you might get a specific and helpful explanation.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    6. Re:"restrict the discussions by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1

      The sig is a way of trying to express my disdain for people to lazy to read linked articles but who still try and take part in a discussion of said article.

      I suppose it is my attempt at Socratic irony:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irony

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    7. Re:"restrict the discussions by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the definition of the word troll. It does seem to be a little different to the one posted in a link above though. I think I prefer the definition posted above as it seems to suggest that a prerequisite for being a troll is an ignorance of the subject you are posting about.

      I posted a reply to someone else regarding my sig and see no reason to repeat it here.

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    8. Re:"restrict the discussions by deniable · · Score: 1
      Others have pretty much covered the definition of troll. I was pointing more to the use of Sock Puppets. The term Throw-away or disposable account might have been more accurate. These can be just as annoying to the people who don't want to read AC comments but will show up as logged-in users.

      As for your down-mods, never attribute to malice that which can be explained by stupidity or laziness.

    9. Re:"restrict the discussions by puck01 · · Score: 1

      The sig is a way of trying to express my disdain for people to lazy to read linked articles but who still try and take part in a discussion of said article.

      I'd hazard a guess that message you are trying to convey is not that same as what you are actually acomplishing. Might want to reassess the message/method.

    10. Re:"restrict the discussions by Alsee · · Score: 1

      never attribute to malice that which can be explained by stupidity or laziness

      Naïveté and doom.
      Nefarious troll, thy name is deniable.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  13. "Improved Discussions"? by grub · · Score: 4, Funny


    Taco,

    "Improved Discussions" would require you delete all your current user accounts and start over.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:"Improved Discussions"? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1
      Don't worry, he's posting from the future:

      from the how-i-spent-my-summer-vacation dept.
      At the end of August, all user accounts will be deleted; just because it hasn't happened yet doesn't mean it's not in the works.

      Unless, of course, it was last summer's vacation spent on discussion2 and these other changes, in which case the deletion of user accounts may also take nine months to roll out.
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:"Improved Discussions"? by PeterBrett · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, he's posting from the future:

      from the how-i-spent-my-summer-vacation dept.
      At the end of August, all user accounts will be deleted; just because it hasn't happened yet doesn't mean it's not in the works.

      Unless, of course, it was last summer's vacation spent on discussion2 and these other changes, in which case the deletion of user accounts may also take nine months to roll out.

      Of course, he could now be living in the southern hemisphere.

      Just a thought.

  14. new feautures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's the stupidest fucking idea I've heard since...

    wait a min...

  15. How about ... by suv4x4 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Some better classification and filters on Slashdot, so we can reduce the noise levels. Give the articles:

    a "credibility rating" (from "improbable rumor" to "we guarantee it's correct with our life".. ok pick better named)

    an "importance" rating (from "something to read if you're bored with life" to "breaking effin news!!!")

    and "time effect" rating (from "it was announced to happen in somewhere the next 100 years" to "it just happened now!")

    Because, damn. I'm sick of all the noise on Slashdot. And that's gold I'm giving you here. If you don't use it, I'll be so pissed off, I'll start my own news site just to see it happen :P

    1. Re:How about ... by orclevegam · · Score: 3, Interesting

      These are all excellent ideas. I'd also like to suggest maybe some sort of karma system for stories in general. It seems there are a few regular posters that people always complain about for either blatantly plugging their blogs, or for posting psuedo-science with a terrible summary that makes it sound like an actual scientific breakthrough but after RTFA is just garbage. As it is now, the tagging system has been partially corrupted for this purpose which is unfortunate and shows that there are needs that the current system is not addressing.

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    2. Re:How about ... by corsec67 · · Score: 1

      You forgot one for "time effect":

      It happened 5 years ago

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    3. Re:How about ... by kevin_conaway · · Score: 4, Insightful

      an "importance" rating (from "something to read if you're bored with life" to "breaking effin news!!!")

      Who decides what is important? I generally avoid hardware stories like the plague but some electrical engineer might consider them gangbusters.

      and "time effect" rating (from "it was announced to happen in somewhere the next 100 years" to "it just happened now!")

      Most of the time, I think that type of information is irrelevant or only interesting to a minute portion of the users.

      Honestly, most of what you want seems to take the place of actually reading TFA and forming opinions on it yourself

    4. Re:How about ... by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

      Who decides what is important? I generally avoid hardware stories like the plague but some electrical engineer might consider them gangbusters.

      Who decides what's important? Who decided what's beautiful? Yes: there's no perfect way to do it.

      But if you don't do it, it's even worse. Who'd argue that Apple's products are more elegant that your generic beige box? Do you know why? Because someone (Steve Jobs) stepped up and said "I'll tell you what's important and what's beautiful".

      And with the beige box, they just sat there thinking how to be as generic as possible to cover all their bases.

    5. Re:How about ... by Climate+Shill · · Score: 1

      You're wasting your time - every time this is discussed people submit great and/or obvious ideas for improving Slashdot. Not once have any of them been taken up.

      Here's my obvious and great idea for improving it: have a period after the the arrival of the story on the front page in which people are not allowed to post. That would go a long way to minimise the idiot postings from people who DNRTFA.

    6. Re:How about ... by tf23 · · Score: 1

      Isn't this part of the reason for the tagging system? Tag the article "veryimportant" or "improbable".

      I guess one could also use the firehose to vote something up/down. However, voting something up/down doesn't seem to _do_ anything from my viewpoint other then change the color on the header of the item within the firehose. Now, if things were deleted from the firehose once they were voted down too many times, that seems useful.

    7. Re:How about ... by crumley · · Score: 1

      You're wasting your time - every time this is discussed people submit great and/or obvious ideas for improving Slashdot. Not once have any of them been taken up. Lots of ideas from discussions have been implemented. Accounts, Meta-mod, and Firehose all came up in discussions before they were implemented. You can argue about the executation and the timeliness, but /. certainly listens to its users.

      Here's my obvious and great idea for improving it: have a period after the the arrival of the story on the front page in which people are not allowed to post. That would go a long way to minimise the idiot postings from people who DNRTFA. This already effectively the case for subscribers - they see the articles first, but can't post till they go live.
      --
      Preventive War is like committing suicide for fear of death. - Otto Von Bismarck
    8. Re:How about ... by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

      You're wasting your time - every time this is discussed people submit great and/or obvious ideas for improving Slashdot. Not once have any of them been taken up.

      Well, you know, actually I'm not kidding about making my own site, there's far too much noise on slashdot, it's killing me inside. I'm a Slashdot junkee, and junkees don't like garbage in their drugs.

      This is the second time I'm saying I'm gonna make my news site, the first time I was pissed about noise on slashdot, I bought the domain (of course... :P ), this time I've setup the interface, layout and basic operation.

      I guess the third time will be release time. But I'll just sit and see what happens for a bit more.

    9. Re:How about ... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I'd also like to suggest maybe some sort of karma system for stories in general.

      Amen to that. I'd like to auto-downvote the automated posters from IBM (BlueVoodoo and LinucksGirl) and a host of other idiots, especially Beatles-Beatles, who simply can not manage to figure out how to make a link.

      I'd also like to auto-downvote all feeds, none of which are properly formatted for slashdot. And anything with "Comodo" in the name, because those are just a bunch of pressrelease spam. There are some others, but these are the ones that stick out.

      As it is now, the tagging system has been partially corrupted for this purpose which is unfortunate and shows that there are needs that the current system is not addressing.

      Actually, you can't use tagging for this any more because the tagging system has been castrated and undemocratized.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:How about ... by Danse · · Score: 1

      Who decides what is important? I generally avoid hardware stories like the plague but some electrical engineer might consider them gangbusters. Well, there is the section filter as well, so you could ignore hardware stories if you like. Still not sure such a system would be useful, but it could probably be ignored just as easily if you don't want to use it.
      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    11. Re:How about ... by Big+Nothing · · Score: 1

      Tagging system corrupted? Whatcha talking bout? I can finally search for "yes", "no" and "slownewsday" - how can that not be helpful?

      --
      SIG: TAKE OFF EVERY 'CAPTAIN'!!
    12. Re:How about ... by Alsee · · Score: 1

      I can finally search for "yes", "no" and "slownewsday" - how can that not be helpful?

      Bah! "yes" and "no" are useless tags.
      I find it much more helpful searching for stories tagged "maybe".

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  16. Geeks in Space.... by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Aww man get my hopes up! Cepstral voice reading me a Slashdot story?? MEH! I would actually ENJOY listening to a new Geeks in Space. Yeah, that's so last century, but I don't care. Geeks in Space was a podcast but with out the RSS! :D

    --

    Gorkman

    1. Re:Geeks in Space.... by mdavids · · Score: 1

      I second the call for the return of Geeks in Space. I have very fond memories of that show. There's no reason why there should only ever be one funny free software-related podcast at a time.

      I know the Geek Compound is no more, and everybody's scattered across the US, but we have useable VoIP now. Can you imagine that happy day when geeks across the world will be able to unite in fellowship and say as one "I've been listening to Geeks in Space since before it started to suck"?

    2. Re:Geeks in Space.... by JamesGecko · · Score: 1

      I didn't even know such a thing existed, but listening to the archives, I'm terribly disappointed that I missed it. A return would pwn.

    3. Re:Geeks in Space.... by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      Damn straight. I still loved the Y2K Geeks in Space.

      --

      Gorkman

  17. Top-level-replies on new Discussion system by Baumi · · Score: 1

    I like the new discussion system, but it's a hassle that it still doesn't seem to allow top-level replies. (I.e. to reply directly to the article, I need to switch it off.)

    1. Re:Top-level-replies on new Discussion system by josecanuc · · Score: 3, Informative

      The "Reply" link is on the floating control on the left side of the page.

    2. Re:Top-level-replies on new Discussion system by Baumi · · Score: 1

      Thanks a lot! I never looked there for some reason...

  18. Um, this ain't rocket science... by jbarr · · Score: 1

    The comment slider on the left is actually kinda nice. It dynamically adjusts what comments are fully visible, "abbreviated", and hidden, replacing the old "threshold" setting quite nicely. It really doesn't take much explanation. Just navigate to an article with lots of articles, and play around with it to see how it works--no manual required.

    In FireFox, I am getting some occasional JavaScript errors reported by FireBug, but overall, the new system seems to work well. Give it a chance, and give 'em feedback. That's the ONLY way it'll ever improve. Besides, you can always turn it off during this testing period.

    --
    My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    1. Re:Um, this ain't rocket science... by psydeshow · · Score: 1

      Play around with it isn't valid. I like the UI, but why can't it tell you the scores that the sliders are set to?

      I know, a geek can figure it out in a few seconds, but it's dumb that he should have to deduce when the values could just be right there.

  19. Podcast with Cepstral voices by Baumi · · Score: 1

    Aww man get my hopes up! Cepstral voice reading me a Slashdot story?? MEH! I may be a geek, but I'm apparently not geeky enough to appreciate the monotonous reading style of current TTS-Systems. It's certainly a great service for the visually impaired or anyone else who doesn't have time or opportunity to read /., but I just can't stand listening to the voice for more than a couple of seconds.
    1. Re:Podcast with Cepstral voices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but I just can't stand listening to the voice for more than a couple of seconds Yet TTS is still an improvement over the voices for Geeks in Space.
  20. It's about content, not gadgets by rueger · · Score: 1
    Honestly I'd like to see the Slashdot Overlords spend less time on gewgaws like these, and more time on establishing some minimal editorial standards.

    I'm assuming that the vast majority of readers are here for content, and the weaknesses in that content are a great frustration.

    I'm not talking about hiring New York Times journalists, only asking for basic standards like:

    • Have someone, anyone check for dupes. Is it really possible that none of the "Editors" at Slashdot read their own site?
    • Have someone read TFA to make sure that the summary posted actually reflects what the originating article or page says. Too often the summary is entirely different from that actual article.
    • Have someone check TFA to weed out obvious self promotion. Really, there are times when this get's to be ridiculous. Same for the posts that are a restatement of some guys uninformed blog post.
    • Please, have someone take charge of basic spelling and grammar, and the headlines that seem to be created from random phrase generation.
    Honestly this operation is large enough, and lucrative enough, and has enough paid subscribers that it is reasonable to insist on some level of professional editorial activity.

    Adding AIM messaging is only useful if you can assure me that what you're delivering is good enough that my first instinct isn't to go to the source material to make sure that I'm not being misled.
    1. Re:It's about content, not gadgets by mikael · · Score: 1


      Have someone, anyone check for dupes. Is it really possible that none of the "Editors" at Slashdot read their own site?


      A better solution would be to do a keyword search on any submitted article by keyword. It could simply show the most recent article submissions. Then ask the user if they still want to submit their scoop.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    2. Re:It's about content, not gadgets by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      That would require the site search to not suck donkey balls.
      Try searching for say, advent. then try searching google with advent site:slashdot.org

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
    3. Re:It's about content, not gadgets by Frogbert · · Score: 1

      I love the dupes, I love the wildly inaccurate summaries, I love the shameless self promotion of submitters and I especially love the crappy speling, and, grammar,

      That is what makes Slashdot great.

    4. Re:It's about content, not gadgets by dargaud · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming that the vast majority of readers are here for content You'd be surprised, but actualy not. I come here for the discussion. If I have the time I'll even read the discussions on subjects I know nothing about and am not interested in, without RTFA, just to learn if other people's opinion is the same as mine (usually it's not) and if it's something worth looking into.
      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
  21. GeoRSS and OpenLayers support for Slashdot? by Lord+Satri · · Score: 1

    That would be great, no? Here's a previous /. discussion on GeoRSS. The GeoRSS plugin for Slash is almost complete, it already works, but some efforts are required to finalize it, and I bet the Slashdot team has way more resources than my small team! :-)

    And hey, we even have OpenLayers with Google Maps maps within stories. Same story as GeoRSS for Slash, this Slash plugin works (example here (temporarily disabled)), and not much is required to make it fully complete!

  22. Podcasting before it was cool by Triv · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You guys were podcasting back in the day with Geeks in Space. Those recordings viewed from now, almost a decade later, would be an awesome peek back into a different kind of internet, but I can't find the mp3's archived anywhere - I used to have 'em on a ZiP disk (heh) but even if I knew where it was, I'd have no way to read it.

    Anyone have a copy of 'em lying around that they'd like to make available for research's/nostalgia's sake?


    -Triv

    1. Re:Podcasting before it was cool by nullbort · · Score: 4, Informative
    2. Re:Podcasting before it was cool by grahamkracker · · Score: 1
  23. What about sorting filters? by mungurk · · Score: 0

    As far as I am aware, Slashdot does not offer a sorting filter.
    It would be a REALLY great feature to be able to click to only display messages with a score of "4 or 5" for instance. That would also help minimize the amount of trolling nonsense that makes its way onto the board, and let me see comments that are "insightful" or "helpful" first. If I really want to see a "1" level comment, I would just scroll to the bottom of the page.

    1. Re:What about sorting filters? by crumley · · Score: 1

      Have you played with the preferences? It seems like Display Mode: Flat, Sort Order: Highest Scores First, and Threshold: +4 might be what you want.

      --
      Preventive War is like committing suicide for fear of death. - Otto Von Bismarck
    2. Re:What about sorting filters? by mungurk · · Score: 1

      crumley,
      That looks like what I was hoping to see, I just did not know of the feature.
      Thanks for pointing me in the right direction!

    3. Re:What about sorting filters? by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      How exactly is this better than the current comment karma cut-off scheme?
      In particular, how is it not much worse for multi-page discussions?

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
    4. Re:What about sorting filters? by mungurk · · Score: 1

      Well, if you think of it like this, when I view a SERP (Search Engine Results Page) a well thought out one would provide the results in several modules, and permit sorting and filtering on variables such as relevancy, date, author, domain, language, etc (features that regrettably are absent from Google, although I can restrict on the advanced search query things like the domain or language). What I do not get from Google, though, is grouping all the results by a domain, language, author, etc. (for instance all the results from CNN.com grouped together).

      I mention this, even though it seems off-topic, to prepare a context in which to consider the sorting features on Slashdot. Some of these already exist, for instance, if I click on my user name, I can see everything I have submitted to Slashdot while logged in under my username. So, on your point/question of how might it break up multipage discussions, I would agree that it can (which is not so good). However in the Web 2.0 world, the features, at one level, are all about the user defining how he or she elects to view the content, rather than conforming to static definitions. Greasemonkey is popular, despite its deficiencies precisely because it permits such flexibility. Other technologies, like Snowflake, to mention but one, are similar in principle: don't tie down the user. Yes, have default settings that represent the way you want the page and its results/threads delivered, but permit the choices to the user. It might not always be appropriate to view in this manner (such as in your example). Is this a geek feature to be employed by but a few. Yes, probably at first, but more long-term (which in the world of IT could be months to a few years) it will be simply the way that a professional website is expected to perform.

    5. Re:What about sorting filters? by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      What I do not get from Google, though, is grouping all the results by a domain, language, author,
      etc. (for instance all the results from CNN.com grouped together). Actually, you do. It does it automagically whenever it decides there are too many (possibly similar)
      results from the domain. Regardless, a *threaded discussion* is not a set of search results.

      There is no such thing as "the Web 2.0 world," just people fucking around with UIs, sometimes for the better,
      often for the worse. It's not Burger King, or a database, and they've no reason to serve you steak tartar on
      a bun just because you think it would be a good idea.
      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
  24. "restrict the discussions-OSnews. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OSNews went that way, and look how well it worked for them.

  25. Depends on what your friends use by edmicman · · Score: 1

    Maybe if you've only been using IM in recent times. All of my contacts are in AIM, since that's what we've all been using since 1998 or so. I haven't used the official AIM client in probably 5 years or so. Gaim/Pidgin for me. Why would I want switch networks, let alone a web-based one that requires my browser to be open (speaking to Gmail based Gtalk...there's a standalone GTalk client, too, right?)

    1. Re:Depends on what your friends use by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      GTalk can be spoken to by any standard Jabber/XMPP client. I've got Trillian talking to it with no worries.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    2. Re:Depends on what your friends use by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      Same here. I can't remember when I first started using AIM, but it was pretty soon after it came out, and aside from a few Europeans who are on MSN (I don't understand the Europe/MSN connection, but it seems to be much more popular over there), and people who use GTalk while at work, everyone I talk with is still on AIM. The features or lack thereof of any other network are basically irrelevant to me, since I'm not going to switch.

      The AOL client is certainly dreadful (just like the stock MSN client, or the stock Yahoo client), but that's solved easily by using Gaim/Pidgin/Adium. Once you ditch the crappy client ... it's just a network. As long as it passes my packets to the people I want to talk with, that's all I care about.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    3. Re:Depends on what your friends use by pyrrhonist · · Score: 1

      Gaim/Pidgin for me. Why would I want switch networks, let alone a web-based one that requires my browser to be open (speaking to Gmail based Gtalk...there's a standalone GTalk client, too, right?)

      Yes, there is a standalone client for Gtalk, but more importantly, your preferred IM application already supports Gtalk. The IM portion of Gtalk is XMPP. If you already have a Gtalk account, just add a new XMPP account in Pidgin. Then in the, "Advanced" tab, set the, "Connect Server", to, "talk.google.com". The default port is fine. If you don't have a Gtalk account, you can set one up via the web without using the client. That's it, enjoy!

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
  26. Podcasts by hansonc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hey if you're going to do a podcast (as such) why not bring back Geeks in Space?

  27. No Dupes by kthejoker · · Score: 1

    On a similar note, I haven't noticed a duplicate article in forever. I don't know if you guys just use the tagging system to pick 'em out quicker, or if you're being more diligent about checking for dupes, but great job, guys.

  28. Robot Overlord by Viking+Coder · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I for one would like to welcome our new Slashdot Robot Overlord, but I can't find it, since the link is biffed in the article.

    Anyone know where it really is?

    --
    Education is the silver bullet.
    1. Re:Robot Overlord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes - where is it?

    2. Re:Robot Overlord by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 3, Informative
      It shows up for me on the front page, at the top... sometimes it gets replaced with the "metamod" thing, but a quick refresh will bring it back up most of the time.

      Slashdot stories can be listened to in audio form via an RSS feed, as read by our own robotic overlord.
      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
  29. IM notification of posts? by N7DR · · Score: 1
    Recently we added the ability to receive AIM instant messages to notify you when stories are posted,

    OK, so I thought "great, I can stop monitoring the RSS feed and get more timely notifications" when I read this. But I can't see any option to actually enable this in my Message Preferences page :-(

    1. Re:IM notification of posts? by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 1

      You have to have an AIM nick in your profile.

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
    2. Re:IM notification of posts? by N7DR · · Score: 1
      You have to have an AIM nick in your profile.

      Necessary, but not sufficient :-( In other words, I do. And several of the drop down lists include an IM selection; it's just that I don't see anything that I can interpret as "selecting this will mean that I'll receive notifications of posts" (via any means at all, actually, not just IM).

      Maybe one needs to be a subscriber? (Which I'm not.)

    3. Re:IM notification of posts? by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 1

      "New story posted" is the option you're looking for

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
    4. Re:IM notification of posts? by tf23 · · Score: 1

      Go edit your user prefs and put your AIM info in. Save it. Then click on the select box pulldowns on /my/messages for comment reply, journal entry by friend and Journal Reply. You should see an "IM" option on each pulldown.

    5. Re:IM notification of posts? by N7DR · · Score: 1
      "New story posted" is the option you're looking for

      If there were any such thing in my Message Preferences I wouldn't have started this discussion. There's nothing like that at all :-(

      WAIT! It's there now. I took a screenshot earlier, and it wasn't there then. But it is now. So I have no idea what changed, but something sure did. Oh well, I suppose I have to go back to work now. Until the next /. story gets posted, anyway.

  30. Discussion 2 by 31415926535897 · · Score: 1

    I think discussion 2 is great, but there is one thing about it that I either don't understand or doesn't seem to work correctly. Instead of trying to explain exactly what it is, I'll give an example of what I mean. In the old system, if I browsed at +3, I would see every post that was +3 or higher, no matter where it was in the thread. Now it seems that if I browse at +3, all of those are displayed if they're the top level in the discussion thread. Any +3 posts underneath a top level post gets abbreviated, but all of the +4 and +5 posts are still full text. If I browse at +3 "Full", I would like all of the +3 posts to be full text, not just the top level posts. So now the number of posts over my threshold (as displayed on the main page) doesn't match the number of "Full" posts when I read the discussion. Hopefully I'm just using it incorrectly, and if so, please correct me.

  31. And, and... by junglee_iitk · · Score: 1

    also add a "edit" button :) It is quite embarassing to right not gud englis & nt b abltoco rrect it later

    1. Re:And, and... by IpalindromeI · · Score: 1

      The "edit" button already exists, except it's labeled "Preview". Editing submitted posts opens all kinds of trolling possibilities. I think it would be much worse than the benefit.

      --

      --
      Promoting critical thinking since 1994.
    2. Re:And, and... by junglee_iitk · · Score: 1

      Yep... that thought never entered my mind. Thanks.

    3. Re:And, and... by kchrist · · Score: 1

      I'm a big proponent of allowing editing or deletion of comments up until the comment is moderated or replied to. That gives people a window to edit their posts if they need to but solves the trolling problem.

  32. Definition of troll by wiredog · · Score: 1

    Here.

  33. Different comment view thresholds when moderating? by Curmudgeonlyoldbloke · · Score: 1

    Just a thought - it would be useful to be able to have two different comment view thresholds. One would be the current one, which works as it does now, another would be for use when you have moderator points (so that it could be set to a lower value.

  34. Fix threshold -1, nested view and pagination! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the love of God man, can we get the current product actually working before adding new features? Will threshold -1, nested view and pagination actually work in Discussion 2, or will posts still mysteriously disappear?

    1. Re:Fix threshold -1, nested view and pagination! by Random832 · · Score: 1

      Um, I thought nested view was "all expanded", whereas threaded view is equivalent to "all abbreviated".

      I'm not sure I see the point of pagination, except maybe to keep the height of the entire page below the magic 65K pixel limit.

      --
      We've secretly replaced Slashdot with new Folgers Crystals - let's see if it notices.
    2. Re:Fix threshold -1, nested view and pagination! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, I thought nested view was "all expanded", whereas threaded view is equivalent to "all abbreviated". Correct. However at threshold -1, nested view, oldest post first, often some posts will disappear altogether. (Interesting to note which ones as well) It appears to only happen to replies to posts. Here is a post outlining affected example posts from a discussion yesterday (complete with my over the top conspiracy theory): http://apple.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=241925&c id=19660547
      Yesterday, the three posts listed did not appear on any page of the discussion when viewed at threshold -1, nested view, oldest post first and not logged in, despite being there. I have not checked today and suspect some offset may have changed since. This is a persistent and reproducible bug that is ignored time and time again, enough to make me rather suspicious.

      I'm not sure I see the point of pagination, except maybe to keep the height of the entire page below the magic 65K pixel limit. In threshold -1, nested view, oldest post first, the "second page is usually identical to the first, and often the third is as well, the number of duplicate pages seems related to the overall length of the discussion.

      I suspect that the missing posts is related to the broken pagination somehow. (...and perhaps this "spill" parameter is involved as it cannot be set by "anonymous" users)

      NOTE: all this is observed while not logged in and browsing the discussions "anonymously".
    3. Re:Fix threshold -1, nested view and pagination! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      P.S. I'm not that stupid. Of course I understand the difference between threaded and nested views and what pagination means. I know forum bugs when I see them. Yet I fully expect the issue to continue to be ignored, sigh.

    4. Re:Fix threshold -1, nested view and pagination! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK somebody mod the parent down as insulting and the result of low reading comprehension. This is a real bug, yet will continue to be ignored. While this idiot gets modded up for stating the obvious! Argh!

      The irony of the censorship (moderation) system resulting in hiding reports of its own bugs is not lost on me. It is hugely irritating but I do see the humour in it.

    5. Re:Fix threshold -1, nested view and pagination! by Random832 · · Score: 1

      I thought you were claiming bugs in the new discussion system, which doesn't _have_ "oldest post first", and i thought you were complaining at the lack of a nested view _button_ or pagination settings. It's a bit ridiculous to claim that i'm insulting you because I thought you were talking about the new discussion system in a story about the new discussion system.

      --
      We've secretly replaced Slashdot with new Folgers Crystals - let's see if it notices.
    6. Re:Fix threshold -1, nested view and pagination! by Random832 · · Score: 1

      I, on the other hand, expect the issue to be completely fixed via a total rewrite - considering that there has, in fact, been a total rewrite. Why waste time fixing bugs in a codebase they're about to throw away?

      --
      We've secretly replaced Slashdot with new Folgers Crystals - let's see if it notices.
  35. SMS by Kamineko · · Score: 1

    Slashdot on the Master System? That's so crazy it just might work!

  36. Appearance in abbreviated posts by pavon · · Score: 1

    How is this different from the old blockquote (below)? The difference is in what how the quote is treated in the abbreviated posts. As an AC you are not using discussion2 yet so you can't see it, but displays messages in a nested format where comments modded above a certain threshold are shown in their entirety, and those below the threshold are displayed in an abbreviated form with just the title, score, username, and then however much of the opening sentence will fit on the rest of the line. However, since so many posts start out by quoting a section from the parent, showing the first line wasn't very useful. Now if you use the new quote tag, then slashcode skips over the quote when in abbreviated form, and instead showing the first non-quote line. It is a nice bit of polish, although I don't know why the couldn't have done the same using the standard html blockquote.
  37. Threading by mr100percent · · Score: 1

    I like discussion2, but can they fix the threading? Digg and dailykos both manage to display replies with a click without reloading the entire page. I have to browse by Nested to avoid this.

  38. Probably your preferences by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    You might have a preference set that gives a bonus to certain types of comments.

    I don't think there's any way to start out at +3 without any moderation. Even if you have Karma Bonus and are a subscriber, you'll only start out at +2, the bonuses aren't cumulative. (And if you don't want subscribers to get a bonus you can change that in your personal preferences, too.)

    Just as an example, I'm a subscriber and I also get the karma point, but when I submit this (I won't disable either, although as a general rule I normally check 'No Karma Bonus' for offtopic/meta comments) it'll just be +2 before it gets moderated.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:Probably your preferences by Control+Group · · Score: 1

      Normally, this is due to friend and friend-of-a-friend status. I'm not sure, but I think the default behavior is to give anyone you've identified as friend a transparent +1 on top of pre-existing karma/subscriber bonuses.

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    2. Re:Probably your preferences by Baricom · · Score: 1

      I don't think there's any way to start out at +3 without any moderation. Slashdot staff (or is it just CmdrTaco?) start at +3, but they post rarely, so I'm not sure that's what the parent saw.
  39. discussion2 settings by nido · · Score: 1

    After having finished teh college, time available to spend on /. has decreased. I've found that most posts that get at least one mod point are probably worth reading. I like the discussion2 system because it allows me to pull out all the posts that got a positive mod point, even those by a 'Coward' that only got a single point.

    With that in mind, these are the pertinent Discussion2 settings that I use:

    Highlight Threshold: 2: Score +2 (displays all the comments in the thread that are scored 2 or higher)
    Reason Modifier: +1 for Insightful, Informative, Interesting and Funny
    Friends & Fans: +1 (want to see who likes what I have to say)
    Foes & Freaks: +1 (want to see who hates what I have to say)
    Anonymous modifier: +1 (plenty of good posts by teh Cowards - this gets their posts over my '2' threshold if they get modded up)
    Karma Bonus: 0 (too many people have the bonus now for it to be meaningful)

    Now if I could only get it to automatically collapse all the top-level 1-rated comments in the stories, it'd be perfect.

    Thanks for the update, Mr. Taco - it's always nice to hear a bit about what's going on behind the screen. :)

    --
    Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
    www.teslabox.com
  40. Parent below threshold - confusion! by 6Yankee · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Still, as far as I can see, no indication that the parent post is below my threshold - meaning much confusion when trying to follow threads.

    Anything but a direct reply to the article is indented and has a light grey "L" shape to the left (a tree link) indicating a link to the parent - but if the parent is below my threshold, it looks as if the child is linked to the comment above the parent. This leads to silliness like

    Insightful post here
    |
    +- Re: Goatse


    How about it, guys?

    A simple icon change would make it clear that there's no relation between these two posts - perhaps a cross to show that there's no link:

    Insightful post here
    X
    +- Re: Goatse

    1. Re:Parent below threshold - confusion! by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

      Oh, and the ability to edit my posts when I put the "How about it, guys?" after the wrong ASCII-scribble.

      Oh, and a pony. OMG ponies!

  41. Kill the mood? by Rolgar · · Score: 1

    It was only last week that we heard about Voice Chat killing the mood, right? Perfect time to launch a Slashdot Podcast.

  42. ob. Futurama by sootman · · Score: 1

    If you don't use it, I'll be so pissed off, I'll start my own news site just to see it happen

    With hookers and blackjack! In fact, forget the news site.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  43. Until you get rid of that stupid prompt by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    that says I'm posting too fast to the discussion - WHEN THE DISCUSSION IS HOURS OLD AND NOBODY ELSE IS POSTING - I don't give a shit what you've changed.

    Buy another server if you can't handle the load. morons.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    1. Re:Until you get rid of that stupid prompt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ah! well, YES SIR, We'll get right on it because we don't care about spamming at all! no your arguments were so cleverly formed and humbly proposed that we just have to agree with you and recognise our mistakes... So sorry.

      CmdrTaco

    2. Re:Until you get rid of that stupid prompt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that says I'm posting too fast to the discussion - WHEN THE DISCUSSION IS HOURS OLD AND NOBODY ELSE IS POSTING - I don't give a shit what you've changed.

      Buy another server if you can't handle the load. morons. I second that motion. The post flood interval of 30 minutes is insane overkill, and I simply defeat it by changing my IP address anyway, but it is a colossal pain in the ass.

      At least be honest and tell us in the message that it is a post flood interval to prevent spam from scripts and to reduce the heavy load of perl on the cpu intead of some bogus excuse about allowing everyone a chance to comment. As well as your probe on port 80 on each post, I imagine the socket timeouts could be used as a DoS attack without the protection of the ridiculously long flood interval. Drop the probe to look for proxies (I mean who really fucking cares anyway) and you have one less reason to use an insanely long post flood interval.

      I have gotten messages of up to:

      "Slow down cowboy!
      Slashdot requires you to wait between each successful posting of a comment to allow everyone a fair chance at posting a comment.
      It's been 22 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment".

      I mean really, that is just stupid.

      Having to change my IP address for each new post is a pain in the ass and is not at all necessary as I have indicated.

      Sigh, here we go... I just posted IN A DIFFERENT THREAD and I got the message on submitting this post (making the "allow everyone a fair chance at posting a comment" part doubly redundant). So here is the post addendum I have begun to routinely add to all but my first post of the day:

      [IP address changed for this post to defeat slashdot's ridiculous 30 minute post flood interval.]
  44. So What Would Happen If A Lot Of People... by Real+World+Stuff · · Score: 1

    Put in the same IM contact information?
    Heh.

    --
    If we don't fight for ourselves no one will.
  45. Slashdot needs another namespace in their RSS feed by JiveBay · · Score: 1

    Since Slashdot has a filtering system that lets you filter news based on whether it hit the frontpage or not, Slashdot really needs to add in a option for that in their feed. I tried to find an email or contact us page but it seems they took it down. Even Digg keeps their contact information on their page.

  46. How about ...self-moderation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *shrug* For what it's worth I have always thought the Usenet model would have worked. It's more work than having someone else make all the decisions, but for a site that has a YRO section, you'd think people would be clamoring for it.

  47. September is the 10th anniversary... by MsGeek · · Score: 1

    Will there be any funstuff going on to celebrate?

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    1. Re:September is the 10th anniversary... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Will there be any funstuff going on to celebrate?

      Maybe they could revert to the original version of the software for a day. Sort of an Antique /.

  48. D2 by krelian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A feature that I really want: being able to see which comments were added since the last time I loaded the page.

    Currently, there is not way to follow discussions you haven't participated. D2 doesn't even have the possibility to temporarily sort comments or threads from newest to oldest without doing it through the preferences page (which you need to access again if you want to change it back when you load a new story). For stories with a large number of comments this means that new comments will barely be read by anyone.

    This is not a complaint by someone who is pissed of that no one will read his comments (see diggers and their new discussion system) but by someone who appreciates the overall quality of discussion on slashdot. Let's face it, these days there are better places to get the news, slashdot's quality is in the comments. This is where new features should go to.

  49. Firehose & FF3/Seamonkey 2 (aka Suiterunner) by tqft · · Score: 1

    Firehose has problems with FF 3 and Seamonkey 2 (aka Suiterunner).

    Slider for filter doesn't work.
    Voting buttons don't work.

    I have emailed the firehose address a few times with error messages and stuff.

    No I don't have js turned off or the no script extension installed.

    --
    The Singularity is closer than you think
    Quant
  50. intentional :-) by r00t · · Score: 1

    This is our little way of excluding the boneheaded marketing droids, evil salesmen, RIAA lawyers, Microsoft PR people, etc.

  51. Nested the new threaded? by tuxedobob · · Score: 1

    So in order to view "nested" mode in the new system, I have to click on every comment? Isn't that pretty much threaded?

    Reply button in a new random place too.

  52. Slashdot Screen Name? by slummy · · Score: 1

    My AIM account is "buddy-list only" which means I need to add the Screen Name Slashdot is using before they'll be able to send me messages. Anyone know what it is?

  53. Aieee! No! by wiredog · · Score: 1

    The best trolls, at least on scientific/technical matters, know their subject intimately.

  54. How's it supposed to work? by jc42 · · Score: 1

    I tried checking the "I'm willing to help" checkbox and hitting the "Submit Query" button. Bit of a bizarre, incomprehensible name there, but I figured it was what someone wanted me to do. As far as I could tell, all it did was erase that line of menus and the "Change" and "Reply" buttons just below the message. I couldn't find any way to do what I'm doing now, i.e., post a reply. I read a while, tried replying to someone's comment - and found that I couldn't.

    So is there a description somewhere of how it's supposed to work? Others are obviously posting replies successfully. I am, too, since I unchecked "I'm willing to help" and hit the "Submit Query" again.

    I'm using SeaMonkey 1.1.2 right now. It has NoScripts installed, but I've enabled scripts for /., so that shouldn't be causing the problems.

    Some people mentioned a "floating box" with sliders. I think I saw that a few months ago, but I don't see it any more.

    --
    Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.