Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft to Offer Free Online Storage

athloi writes "Microsoft Corp. is giving computer users up to 500 megabytes of online storage for their documents, music, photos and video. They're offering it to a select 5,000 test users for now, but will make it widely available later this summer. This move is the latest in a series by the previous large corporation we all loved to hate to compete with the newest large corporation we might hate and fear, Google."

55 of 290 comments (clear)

  1. Too little... by A+Nun+Must+Cow+Herd · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... too late, and too Microsoft.

    1. Re:Too little... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I imagine this is less of a GMail-killer, and more of a .Mac-killer. Some have speculated that the iPhone will have .Mac integration before long. Would be nice to have their Zune automatically sync with this service over wifi before they get there, no?

    2. Re:Too little... by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Informative

      AOL's XDrive.com has been offering 5 GB for free about 6 months now.

    3. Re:Too little... by L.+VeGas · · Score: 4, Funny

      Too little...too late, and too Microsoft. No kidding. I've seen MySpace pages bigger than that.
    4. Re:Too little... by Thwomp · · Score: 5, Funny

      //TODO: Insert obligatory '500MB should be enough for anyone' comment here.

    5. Re:Too little... by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wow. Usually when AOL offers something, it's a sure sign that the fad around it is over.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:Too little... by DECS · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The iPhone already has .Mac integration, because iTunes already syncs it with Safari's bookmarks, email/contacts/calendars, and email settings. ITunes in turn, syncs with .Mac. Users don't have to do anything, and they don't even need to pay for .Mac unless they have various systems they all want to sync together.

      Also, bookmarks, contacts, and email can be accessed from .Mac via the web, which the iPhone can do too. I suppose there would be further ways to integrate or expand .Mac, but it works as is already. I don't know what Microsoft offers that is comparable.

      --

      ZDNet's Mary Jo Foley Says Apple's iPhone Needs ActiveSync
      Mary Jo Foley, who describes her ZDNet blog as "an unblinking eye on Microsoft," seems to have been charged with the unpleasant task of producing a somewhat positive sounding iPhone story, and gave it her best shot. Unfortunately, it wasn't very well thought out, and reflects a preoccupation with flattering Microsoft.

    7. Re:Too little... by Cal+Paterson · · Score: 2, Informative

      Exactly. Gmail offers a gig, and plenty of third party applications store documents there. 500 megabytes explains why Bill Gates is a billionaire- as if anybody needed to be hit over the head with the fact he's a cheap penny pincher.
      This statement is far to dismissive for a product that isn't even concrete yet. It's just heading into beta, there is little available data, and you have already dismissed it.

      I'm not even someone who is a big Microsoft fan - this is posted from a Debian machine, and I personally concur with the politics of Debian.

      On a side note, Bill Gates did not make money from being a "cheap penny pincher". He made money by entering a market where the only real costs of manufacture are the initial R&D. As he is able to "value price" a product at ~£200 (windows) that has a per-unit cost of only a few pence (cd, booklet, box), he is a billionaire.

      I could very easily just mod you down (I have mod points) but I decided that the scale of your ignorance warranted a challenging post.
    8. Re:Too little... by Bwana+Geek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A gig? Where have you been? My Gmail storage limit is currently 2869 MB, and tomorrow it'll be even higher. That's all beside the point, though. I love Gates-bashing as much as the next guy, but Microsoft is offering a site designed specifically for web storage. Using Gmail for file storage, last time I checked, was neither supported or even condoned -- hence the reason you need third party apps to do it.

      A much better comparison would be to AOL's online storage service, as mentioned in the article.

    9. Re:Too little... by loganrapp · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's a trick. Get an axe.

    10. Re:Too little... by bruno.fatia · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Profit from what exactly? Having at&t (note the lowercase) cancelling your subscription because you're excedding the unlimited upload bandwitch?

    11. Re:Too little... by ozmanjusri · · Score: 2, Informative
      Those R&D costs are probably astronomical for a product like Windows.

      Windows makes a profit margin of more than 85 percent. To put this in personal terms, for every dollar you spent licensing the OS last year, Microsoft spent less than 15 cents on all Windows packaging, marketing, support, and, oh yeah, improving the product.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    12. Re:Too little... by Lord_Sintra · · Score: 2, Informative

      Gmail is currently at 2869MB, so that's almost 3GB.

    13. Re:Too little... by ozmanjusri · · Score: 2, Informative
      But it sure would be nice if Windows Mobile did

      It's not for Windows Mobile either.

      LiveDrive is one of the Vista features that slipped from the actual release. http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/software/soa/Microsof t-confirms-Live-Drive-plans/0,130061733,139267189, 00.htm

      Looks like the space they're offering has slipped a bit too. Still, size isn't important, is it guys?

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    14. Re:Too little... by SpinyManiac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The only 32GB limit Microsoft imposes is the maximum FAT32 partition size you can create with Windows 2000 and higher. They can access bigger FAT32 partitions, just not create them.

      If I'm wrong, I'm sure someone will tell me.

      --
      It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
    15. Re:Too little... by hoggoth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > I bet they rely on two things:
      > Most people will only use a fraction of that storage
      > Most people will store highly compressible documents

      That would be a pretty bad bet, since ONE movie video breaks both of those bets.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  2. "We"? Speak for yourself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I still hate Microsoft, and still love Google. You hear that Google? I love you, and this submitter doesn't. When you take over the world, you know who had your back.

  3. Google already done it... indirectly by Yoooder · · Score: 5, Informative

    GMail storage anyone? It lets you use your GMails many GB's of storage as a network drive. 500 fixed MB is pretty paltry in comparison...

  4. Love for... by ajenteks · · Score: 5, Funny

    They're offering it to a select 5,000 test users for now ... each and every one of the Zune adopters?
    1. Re:Love for... by whiteranger99x · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sure, but where do the other 4995 test users come from?

      --
      Join the TWIT army now!
  5. You've Got To Be Kidding... by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Would that all my "stolen" music and "pirated" movies would fit in 500MB.

    Frankly, MS, that's smaller than my current USB drive, and that drive isn't actually very large by today's standards. And it has faster access, too.

    It's easier, when I want to store something, to GMail it to myself. They have over 5X this amount of storage -- and aren't Microsoft!

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:You've Got To Be Kidding... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 3, Informative

      "It's easier, when I want to store something, to GMail it to myself. They have over 5X this amount of storage..."

      And a 20 megabyte attachment limit.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    2. Re:You've Got To Be Kidding... by njhunter · · Score: 2, Funny

      The size of their thumb drive array must be enormous.

  6. Hate what? by jshriverWVU · · Score: 4, Insightful
    This move is the latest in a series by the previous large corporation we all loved to hate to compete with the newest large corporation we might hate and fear, Google.

    Wait what? We hate who... I can guess we all dislike MS, but I dont think fear or hate should be in the same sentence with Google.

    1. Re:Hate what? by Zeebs · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Google hasn't burned it's social credit with tech types, yet. I'm not claiming they will, and I'd like to think they won't.(Why yes I am interested in buying a bridge why do you ask?) I think the might hate and fear is a little strong but not far off in meaning.

      --

      Happy Noodle Boy says "F###ing doughnut! Mock me? You fried cyclops!!"
    2. Re:Hate what? by russotto · · Score: 4, Funny

      Lately, some Slashdotters have been posting about how they fear Google is going to know everything and abuse this knowledge.
      Yeah. The difference is that while it's fear and caution with Google, it's the next best thing to certain knowledge with Microsoft. Entrusting your data to Microsoft is like entrusting your hand to the garbage disposal.
  7. No problem, I one for one welcome... by 605dave · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder if that enough disk space for all my most sensitive documents.

    Because if there is one company I trust not to abuse their power...

    --
    Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a difficult battle. - Plato
  8. Re:Google already done it... indirectly by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 4, Informative

    And will be doing it for real shortly with Gdrive, which is apparently no longer a rumor.

  9. Interesting Combination of Apps Coming Up by popo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It should probably be noted that Microsoft also bought FolderShare.com (which is a very sweet little app).

    The free-storage combined with FolderShare's file swapping is starting to paint an interesting picture... IMHO I wouldn't discount this as "trying to be like Gmail"...

    --
    ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
  10. Re:Google already done it... indirectly by Yoooder · · Score: 2, Interesting
  11. What does it mean by pembo13 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I rather the evil Google corp have (some) of my data than Microsoft have any of my data?

    --
    "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
  12. Omnidrive by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 4, Informative

    www.omnidrive.com

    Users get 1Gb free, and up to 50Gb is available if you want to pay.

    Disclaimer: not a shill, just a happy beta tester.

  13. I'd love to see the EULA by RobertM1968 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The most relevant information to this whole thing (to me) is the EULA MS is foisting on people. Some of their previous EULAs for their online properties have included giving them the right to sell, market and/or redistribute any content you create and upload to those online properties. That, and other privacy issues (using the information to profile you in some manner and then sell ads to you via their LiveSearch stuff for instance - as referenced in a previous post regarding their work on obtaining as much private, identifying data on people as possible) are things I'd like to see clearly addressed and spelled out in their EULA.

    I am also interested in how this all fits in with their current DRM schemes and related practices. Will they DRM any music I upload? Report me to the RIAA? Assume the program archives I upload are pirated and sue me?

    All in all, I see this service as one for only the brain dead - based off MS's previous track record for trustability. (Yeah, it's probably not a real word, get over it).

  14. Re:Google already done it... indirectly by Utopia · · Score: 5, Informative

    Its against Goog policies to use file storage software and your can can be suspended.
    http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answe r=43692

  15. Re:"We"? Speak for yourself. by AchiIIe · · Score: 4, Informative

    Meh, I spoke too fast.

    I tried it. It sucks.
    Nothing innovative, plain old technologies. You go to a page with 5 filename inputs, you select each file, you put them in folders, you share certain folders.

    Screenshots:
    * http://tinyurl.com/2vaa7e (main page)
    * http://tinyurl.com/38fsb9 (uploading screen )
    * http://tinyurl.com/2j53kp (folder with files)

    It does not seem to be "mountable" either.

    --
    Nature journal lied in Britannica vs Wikipedia Ask to retrac
  16. Re:Google already done it... indirectly by Chabil+Ha' · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yes, but you can only send emails that are a maximum of 20MB. I'd love to have to split up a bunch of archives in 20MB chunks...

    That aside, the mere fact that nobody can be held liable for the lost of data and that backups are likely not made, I wouldn't feel bery comfortable with the data being there as a means of recovery.

    --
    We're all hypocrites. We all have hidden parts, it's the contrast between them that make us more a hypocrite than others
  17. One question by edwardpickman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Are viruses included in that 500 meg total? They could really cut into that 500 meg number.

  18. I've got it covered by Statecraftsman · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm perfectly capable of losing my files and documents all by myself. Thanks anyway.

  19. Re:Google already done it... indirectly by cperciva · · Score: 2, Funny

    [Gdrive] is apparently no longer a rumor.

    I think you mean "Gdrive has been rumoured for the past year to no longer be just a rumour". There's no announcement or even confirmation from Google.

  20. Format of the storage... by Vexler · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...will be a .PST file.

    First 500 MB are free? That is, until it hits that 2 GB limit. Then everything goes down the toilet.

  21. Re:The same as everyone else by DECS · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For all that can be complained of .Mac, it has no ads.

    --


    ZDNet's Mary Jo Foley Says Apple's iPhone Needs ActiveSync
    Mary Jo Foley, who describes her ZDNet blog as "an unblinking eye on Microsoft," seems to have been charged with the unpleasant task of producing a somewhat positive sounding iPhone story, and gave it her best shot. Unfortunately, it wasn't very well thought out, and reflects a preoccupation with flattering Microsoft.

  22. Admiral Akbar: "It's a Trap!" by CheeseburgerBrown · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is an obvious honeypot ploy to draw unsuspecting, God-fearing users everywhere to upload their copywrong material and thereby indict themselves for extraordinary rendering by a nefarious acronym.

    Run away! Run away!

  23. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  24. AOL's XDrive blows Microsoft's trial away by scrim · · Score: 2, Informative

    AOL's XDrive is available now and offers users 5Gb for free. It certainly makes 500Mb look paltry. And of course don't forget, the Microsoft offering will exclude Macintosh users. When they go to Microsoft Live they get told they are not running a supported browser. This just goes to show that Microsoft's real strategy is turf protection of their Operating System monopoly.

    --
    Mark S Twitter/AIM/Skype:ekivemark B: http://ekive.blogspot.com
  25. Re:The same as everyone else by DECS · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yes, you do get what you pay for. I'd agree that .Mac needs a significant upgrade, but the baseline service is $99, for the same as what MS is offering. What .Mac really needs is a speed upgrade and far higher bandwidth limits, so it makes any sense as a hosting service.

    When I had the chance to skewer Steve Jobs about it, it did.

    -

    Answers from Steve Jobs at Apple's Shareholder Meeting
    At Apple Inc.'s May 10 annual shareholder meeting, a series of proposals were presented for voting after which CEO Steve Jobs answered a series of questions from the audience.

    ZDNet's Mary Jo Foley Says Apple's iPhone Needs ActiveSync
    Mary Jo Foley, who describes her ZDNet blog as "an unblinking eye on Microsoft," seems to have been charged with the unpleasant task of producing a somewhat positive sounding iPhone story, and gave it her best shot. Unfortunately, it wasn't very well thought out, and reflects a preoccupation with flattering Microsoft.

  26. 500 megs. by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Now, call me ungrateful, but 500 megs? Let's see what such a service could be good for.

    1. Offsite backup.
    2. Making your data "mobile", by making it available wherever you are.
    3. Transfering your data to another machine (local or remote).
    4. Distributing data

    Should anyone have other ideas, please share them.

    Well, for 1, I'd choose pretty much anything BUT Microsoft. They aren't really the company that comes to my mind when it comes to data security.

    For 2, there are USB sticks. Now, you may argue that they cost money while this service is free, but c'mon, 500 megs? I just gave away a 1GB USB stick 'cause it was too small for my needs, and sticks in the 500m region don't cost a fortune.

    For transfer, locally I'd suggest USB as well and for remote, connect the machines directly.

    And for distribution, especially of ... erh ... content whose copyright I cannot claim legally, I'd again choose anything BUT Microsoft.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  27. Re:The same as everyone else by CastrTroy · · Score: 3, Informative

    I pay 7.99 a month for dream host, and I have 246 GB of data storage. Ok, I haven't actually tried to upload that much. Currently I have 1.5 gigs up there, but 246 GB is my quota. Why pay for something like .MAC when you can just get some shared hosting. You can use it as a website too. I'm surprised that more people don't have shared hosting plans. They are cheap, and provide you with a lot of features.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  28. Yes, but is it ssh(fs) accessible? by macemoneta · · Score: 4, Interesting

    AOL gives everyone that signs up for an IM account 100MB of web space, but the interesting thing is it's ssh accessible. That means that you can mount it with sshfs or sftp, making it a handy place to keep (encrypted) data that you access from multiple machines. For example,

    sshfs userid@members.aol.com: /some/directory

    The above (after responding to the password prompt) makes the 100MB available in your local "/some/directory/". The data is also web accessible at:

    http://members.aol.com/userid/

    I find the space, even though small, very handy for storing small amounts of useful information. Using encfs on the sshfs mounted space allows remote access to things like server status/logs in a secure fashion, even when the machine is not directly SSH accessible.

    --

    Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

    1. Re:Yes, but is it ssh(fs) accessible? by macemoneta · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm not an "AOL user", but I do have an IM account. Signing up for AIM is the only requisite to get the space.

      --

      Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

  29. A select 5000 Testers? by Your.Master · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm confused at the summary. I just signed in at that site with my live ID to check it out and I could access it, upload and download. Unless I just happen to be one of the select 5000, and nobody told me.

  30. Anyone heard of Xdrive? by crazyvas · · Score: 2, Informative

    Xdrive.com by AOL? 5GB of free space. And software to map your xdrive as a network drive.

  31. Re:The same as everyone else by suv4x4 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I pay 7.99 a month for dream host, and I have 246 GB of data storage. Ok, I haven't actually tried to upload that much.

    Oh yea, those 246 GB on a shared host what a great example.

    You get 246 GB of disk quota, and if you upload more than 5-6 GB, the FTP mystically gets slow. At ~10 GB, the support calls you to say "you seem to, uhh, be using too much resources on our server, get it? yea... resources. watch it".

    At ~20GB they shut you down and mail you that you're a an effin abuser of their resources, and all the poor users on the same server had their sites down because of you. They forgot to mention that they managed to stuff 200 sites on a server with 100 GB disk and promise them all 246GB quota.

    If you're a thick head and keep uploading, at around 40 GB upload they'll send a hitman in a black mercedes to circle your house and watch at you suggestively.

    At around 60 GB, they call the hitman to hit you, your family and anyone who ever knew you hosted with them.

    Truth is, most people upload their "page coming soon. LOL!" index, and forget about the rest, so get to live on.

  32. Re:I don't need storage: I NEED BANDWIDTH! by adpowers · · Score: 2, Informative

    Amen. I'm experimenting with S3 for backup (offsite backup, in additional to my optical media backups), but the upload time is killer. What scripts/program are you using for backup? I'm currently using JungleDisk because it looked like the best of OS X.

  33. Gmail offers what? by More_Cowbell · · Score: 2, Informative
    Gmail offers a gig"

    Um, Taking a look at my account now, it's at 2869MB of storage and growing daily. (they actually have a ticker: mail.google.com ) I think you are thinking of when they first started?

    Oh, by the way, Gmail is also available to everyone now too, without an invite.

    I was going to mod on this story...

    --
    Experience teaches only the teachable. -AH
  34. Re:The same as everyone else by maztuhblastah · · Score: 4, Informative

    Bullshit.

    Again, I call bullshit. Yes, Dreamhost does oversell like crazy. They even admit to it!. But they actually will let you use all the bandwidth and disk you're given. All of it.

    Right now, a quick look at my panel shows that I'm using 64.1GB of space (as of last measurement). This month, I've moved over 1TB of HTTP traffic alone (I've used another 20GB or so of FTP traffic). No black mercedes. No phonecalls. Not even a damn e-mail from Dreamhost.

    As Dreamhost points out, the only usage-related issue they'll cut you off for is CPU usage. For serving static content (i.e. not PHP pages), Dreamhost actually kicks ass. They really will let you hit both your quotas. Sure, you won't be able to run the next iTunes Movie Store off one of their shared hosts, but you can actually use all the space and not get so much as an e-mailed warning.