Slashdot Mirror
2008 - Year of Linux Desktop?
rstrohmeyer writes "Over at Maximum PC, we're betting that Linux will pick up unprecedented momentum in the coming year. With phenomenal new distros, swelling international support, and a little extra momentum from Dell, we think Linux is poised to exploit the current atmosphere of doubt surrounding Vista and pick up serious traction in '08. 'For end users here in North America, Linux poses a low barrier to entry. While many still balk at an upgrade to Vista (typically centered around cost and restrictive licensing terms), those who are curious about the open-source alternative will find few of these obstacles. And an increasingly rich array of ready-to-run software (not to mention surprisingly effective utilities that let you run many Windows apps) makes it easy switch ... Ultimately, I'm not predicting that Linux will take over the market next year. Or anytime soon, for that matter. But if there's ever been a time to try out the world's leading free OS, 2008 will be that time. I am predicting that users will switch to Linux in record numbers next year. And many will never look back.'"
Someone missed to post the 12th anniversary version of the story.
CC.
TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
It's sad that theres no globally accepted library etc, that all devs use. I mean some apps are mac / windows. why not mac /windows / linux? Since mac runs on a version
of *nix.
And don't give me that wine / cedega bs.
Sadly, until I give up gaming on PC I will have at least one
windows box.
I hope that Linux continues to offer more and more people an alternative though.
Competition is good!
It seems logical that Linux will keep getting progressively better.
It's "Linux desktop" for me already. All of my computers now exclusively run Linux. I have no Windows installs on my server, firewall, laptop or desktop, and only have a couple of Win2K installs in vmware lying around mostly for the very rare times when I need to compile something for Windows.
For me, the switch to Linux was gradual. I didn't just one day decide to do the switch. Over time, my working Windows installs started failing and I found myself using Linux instead, as it was easier than to spend a weekend reinstalling everything. Eventually I was spending months without booting it, and finally it vanished completely when I upgraded hard disks and didn't have any reason to install it.
I don't really see a "Year of Linux desktop" happening. People seem to like their weird theories about what's holding Linux back, as if changing directory structure, or getting rid of X would suddenly make Linux become really popular overnight. It won't. People will gradually fix the problems there are, and its market share will progressively go up, as people run out of reasons not to use it.
As usual, YMMV.
Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
And Linux does not come with great software for internet (Firefox), email (Evolution/Thunderbird), photos (Gimp/GimpShop/Krita), and multimedia (Totem/Amarok/RhythmBox)? That blows...
I think this is the best non-car analogy I've ever seen on slashdot. This should be modded up if only for that reason.
I'm rooting for desktop Linux to continue to make gains, but I think the widespread acceptance that the article suggests (but doesn't predict, mind you) will take a lot longer. Right now, Vista's main competitor is XP. Vista adoption has been slow because most Windows users are satisfied with XP and don't see much value in upgrading to Vista.
I'm a happy* Mac user, but I like knowing that there are viable alternatives out there like Ubuntu, etc.
*not that there is anything wrong with that
It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
yes, and especially because Vista is so bad. Hey, I work for Microsoft and I'll admit that Vista has a lot of ground to cover. It will drive people to alternative OSes, at least some people and if not people, enterprises. We at Microsoft are worried about that, especially in the server market.
It's not narcissicism if it's true!
So I exported the database into a GED file. (I think that's what it was called.) and imported it into Gramps on Ubuntu 7.04.
She is quite happy with it.
The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
Rules 1 and 2 faggot
Loki is gone, but they went bankrupt because their CEO and his wife thought of the company's account as their personal ATM. Loki had no problem turning a profit on porting Windows games -- it was their looting of the finances that drove the company under.
PS. It's been a few years since Loki, and there're more Linux users now. You might wanna update your stupid flamebait.
We've been hearing Linux was "almost ready" for almost 10 years now. Who's got the earliest link to this old saw? I've got Linus in 1999. There's got to be something earlier?
Far superior? Not really. Both players are good enough. Both players have pros and cons. It's more like a question of choice.