Slashdot Mirror


Turns Out Ubuntu Dell Costs $225 More

An anonymous reader writes "One week ago this community discussed the apparent price advantage of Ubuntu Dell over Vista. The article linked to a Dell IdeaStorm page with the status: 'Implemented.' Today the status has changed on that page to 'Reneged: Ubuntu Dell is $225 More Than Windows Dell.' The full price of a Ubuntu Inspiron 1420N is indeed $50 cheaper than the identical hardware configuration with Vista — except that a $275 free upgrade to 2GB memory and a 160-GB hard drive is available for Windows only."

60 of 361 comments (clear)

  1. Vista needs the space by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Funny

    Haven't people been saying the footprint of Linux is a shitload less than Windows bloat.
    You simply don't need the extra on linux.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:Vista needs the space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Which makes having it so much more enjoyable.

    2. Re:Vista needs the space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm guessing you never used KDE _

    3. Re:Vista needs the space by sqldr · · Score: 2, Informative

      You simply don't need the extra on linux

      For what, exactly? 160gb of hard drive space is good if you're a warez hoarder, and 2gb of ram is good if you're compiling software.

      If you're just using it as an internet terminal, then both operating systems are bloated. eg. ubuntu will automatically start cupsd, even if you don't have a printer. If you're obsessed with bloat, then you could spend a week fine-combing gentoo or bsd, or try something like syllable, but ubuntu users want something that will "just work", and that means adding bloat.

      --
      I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
    4. Re:Vista needs the space by Chrisq · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't know about sneezing but it could certainly save on tissues.

    5. Re:Vista needs the space by sqldr · · Score: 4, Interesting

      sounds like you need to try a different distro :-)

      At risk of fanning the gnome/kde flames on this thread already, you could try kubuntu.. i'm not saying it's better, but it is different. You might be happier.

          I've not noticed any of these things in kubuntu, except the movie player thing, and that's likely to be a driver issue. Try configuring the underlying player to use a different rendering target, eg. X11 or opengl instead of Xv.

      --
      I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
    6. Re:Vista needs the space by VanessaE · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I've seen a lot of piss-poor arguements in Windows' favor in my time, but this one just takes the cake. According to Microsoft, Vista requires a minimum of 15GB of disk space (I suspect it's actual needs are less). Linux requires a minimum of about 1.5GB, and about 7.5GB if you have a full system with all the eye candy, all the trimmings, and a handful of third-party apps like OpenOffice. That's a difference of 6.5GB or so from Vista's minimum requirement, and 6.5GB of disk space is just plain pocket change by any reasonably modern metric.


      Just FYI, according to Pricewatch, a 160GB notebook disk goes for about $90 and 1GB DDR2 to fit an Inspiron 1420 will set you back about $53. According to Microsoft, you'll have to shell out $99.99 for Vista Home Basic.

      At the very least, if you price two machines with identical hardware specs, and you don't come out at least a little cheaper without Vista, you are getting RIPPED OFF, plain and simple. This holds true whether the two machines are base models or fully-upgraded-to-the-gills gaming rigs. If they're identical hardware-wise, they should be significantly cheaper without Vista.

      What you do with the disk space beyond what your OS needs is generally entirely up to you - not your OS. It's not like you're just storing a bunch of backup copies of Vista or something - you'll fill it with music, movies, photos, p0rn, third-party software, whatever. Same stuff everyone else fills their boxes with - you just have 6-7GB less space to work with if you choose Vista, at least if the vendor did the right thing and offered the same hardware upgrades to the non-Vista customer, at the same prices/differences.

      I realize there are people here who need that extra disk space for high-end stuff (Oracle springs to mind), but the majority of people who get one of these boxes will do so with something else in mind besides maintaining a multi-million-record database for a large corporation. Hell, I'd only use one for watching movies, listening to music, or coding.

      Sorry to ramble on, it's 9:13am and I haven't slept yet.

    7. Re:Vista needs the space by mhall119 · · Score: 4, Informative

      And yet Ubuntu doesn't 'just work'. As a Ubuntu user since 6.05, I have to say that for me it does 'just work'.

      Why is the bottom panel on my desktop missing about 20% of the time? I have to log out and log back in. Usually it comes back, sometimes it takes 2 logins. I have never had this problem, but it seems your gnome setup has some problems (I'm assuming it's not just your screen resolution not displaying the bottom of the screen).

      Why is the application built into Ubuntu to play music named "Movie Player"? It's not, I've never seen Rythmbox (Ubuntu's music player) called "Movie Player". The "Movie Player" (Totem, I think) can play MP3s, but that isn't what it setup as default for music files.

      Why do I just get a black square when playing a movie with Movie Player? If I move the window I see the movie playing, but the black box comes back as soon as I drop the window. It sounds like your video card driver hasn't properly implemented video playback in X11.

      Why, when I explicity specify I want 2 workspace, does the second workspace disappear and I'm left with one for half of my logins? Even when I do get 2 the second one has no panels at all 75% of the time. Again, I've never had this problem. It seems you have something seriously broken in Gnome. Try creating a new user account and logging in with that and don't change anything with Gnome when you do. If the new account has the same problems, the Gnome install is hosed, re-install it. If the new account is fine, then it's something you did in your account that is causing the problems.

      Why can't I Add/Remove certain software from Add/Remove? Why does it even show up on the list with a checkbox if all it is going to is tell me to run Synaptic? I've heard this complaint before, and honestly it sounds like some stupid configuration. I can't say that I've ever actually used Add/Remove, I prefer synaptic for everything, but this seems a legitimate bug.

      Why is the Software Update notification so annoying? I know Linux generally makes poor use of screen space, but why is the popup so huge? Why isn't it transparent like every other popup on a modern desktop? Uh, huge? It's tiny for me. What is your screen resolution? Are you running 640x480? Because that might be causing some of your other Gnome display problems. And transparent? The notifications I get on Windows XP aren't transparent. Are you using Compiz or Beryl? Those could cause some of your other problems if your video card can't handle them.

      Say I unpack an archive to the desktop and it specifies a directory structure for the files. How come the folder icon is hidden underneath the icon for a drive I mounted a few minutes before? Again, never had this problem. Could be caused by extremely small screen size as I mentioned above.

      Why can't the built in Bittorrent client download more than one torrent at a time? Why does it tell me "Error 98" or some other obscure junk if I try? I never had this problem with the default Bittorrent client, but I'll admit that I installed Azureus because I like it better.

      I don't want a network connection icon to show up in the system tray, I'm on a machine that is wired all the time, I know it is on a network, I put it there. So take if off, what's so hard about that?

      Why are desktop icons so huge? 5000 icon sets, all of them bigger than a breadbox. Icon sets come with different sizes for each icon for different applications. Are you using the biggest size when you don't need it, or again is your screen resolution so low that even 32x32 looks huge?

      This is a partial list. Work on these and I will provide another. Worked on, got any more?

      --
      http://www.mhall119.com
    8. Re:Vista needs the space by B'Trey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      At the very least, if you price two machines with identical hardware specs, and you don't come out at least a little cheaper without Vista, you are getting RIPPED OFF, plain and simple.

      Speaking purely from a business stand-point and ignoring all philosophical issues, this is not definitively true. That is, it may be true that you're being overcharged but it isn't necessarily so. You're looking at one particular cost - the cost of purchasing the operating system - and assuming that every other cost is the same. It may very well not be, even on identical hardware. It's been well documented that Dell gets paid to load crapware on the system. That's revenue that they do not or may not get on the Linux machine, which means they must increase the price to reach the same margin. Its also quite possible that other cost, such as support cost, are increased for Linux machines. This could be due to a number of reasons, such as people using Linux calling in more because they're less familiar with the OS, or help desk people requiring additional training or being harder to find. The bottom line is that computer sellers operate on razor thin margins, and there's a lot more that goes into price calculations than what Microsoft charges for their OS. That doesn't mean that we should set back and pay unwarranted mark-ups without questioning them, but it does mean that simplistic statements such as the one you made above don't tell the whole story.

      --

      "The legitimate powers of government extend only to such acts as are injurious to others." Thomas Jefferson.

    9. Re:Vista needs the space by Anthony+Rosequist · · Score: 5, Insightful

      LOL, that's Ubuntu users for you: "I did not have that problem, therefore it does not exist."
      First, that's not what the parent was saying at all. It was more along the lines of:

      "I did not have that problem, and you didn't give me enough diagnostic information to adequately help you solve it. You can attempt to find someone else with a similar problem, or we can work on it a little bit longer and try and get more information."

      Plus, we don't know if the GP was messing around with things that he shouldn't have. People that are new to Linux (especially if you're having problems) shouldn't be messing with their Gnome install, advanced user settings, or extremely experimental beta eyecandy software, despite how tempting it can be.

      Without knowing that information, I think that mhall did a great job addressing AC's problems. He recommended that, even though he wasn't sure exactly what the problem was (since he had never experienced them), he should:
      • Check his screen resolution (and possibly video card drivers),
      • Not mess with Beryl or Compiz,
      • Create a new, default, user account and see if that helps, or
      • If he doesn't have much to lose, try re-installing.
      You're ridiculing him for some advice that he offered (for free) that was more helpful than most customer service departments (where they get paid), especially given the limited amount of information he had.
    10. Re:Vista needs the space by sqldr · · Score: 2, Informative

      And I am not sure why Kubuntu, XUbuntu and the others exist. XFCE, KDE are available in the mainline Ubuntu.

      The standard KDE distribution comes with loads of applications you probably won't use, and is a little overwhelming (and of course, bloated). Kubuntu have tidied it up, removed everything you probably don't need, put some alternative applications in which they prefer (eg. konversation as the IRC client instead of whatever the old one was), added lots of patches (eg. automatic flash installation when you visit a page with flash in it), and given it a prettier default theme.

      In other words, they did to KDE what ubuntu did to gnome.

      --
      I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
    11. Re:Vista needs the space by jedidiah · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I dunno about that.

      He's complaining about a large number of items I've never seen under Ubuntu in various versions. I've worked in offices where Ubuntu was the workstation OS/distro of choice for programmers and they didn't seem to have those complaints either.

      That guy must be really lucky...

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    12. Re:Vista needs the space by syntaxglitch · · Score: 5, Funny

      LOL, that's Ubuntu users for you:

      Are you still bitter over that one Ubuntu support thread where you acted like a jerk and people didn't magically fix your problem? Holding a grudge for over a year doesn't exactly give you the moral high ground here, you realize.

    13. Re:Vista needs the space by mhall119 · · Score: 2, Informative

      By 'work' you must mean 'boots up'. I shouldn't be suprised at this, since the main effort of the Linux movement seems to be getting it to function in any way at all with a given set of hardware. By 'work' I mean it has been my primary OS both at home and at work for almost 2 years. It does everything that I need it to do with minimal fuss. Hardware is a major factor in a good Linux experience, and I've always made sure that mine has good working drivers for Linux (even non-free in the case of my nVidia card).

      This one I might have to take blame for myself. To be fair, I Add/Removed several music players while trying to find one that would actually play an MP3. At some point one of them successfully alerted me to its need for an MP3 codec as well as directing me to where I could find it. I suspect that Rhythmbox failed to accomplish that. It was probably one of the many that provided absolutely no indication that any operation had taken place at all after I directed it to play an MP3. Ubuntu 7.04 has improved this quite a bit, I'm pretty sure that anything that uses gstreamer will now tell you if you need a specific codec, and download and install that codec for you if it's available from Ubuntu's repos (MP3 codec is available). I can't swear that Rythmbox will do this, since I had the codecs before I upgraded to 7.04, but I'm pretty sure it will work.

      It is larger than it needs to be, how about that? The small icon that appears in the system tray is delightful, but the larger-than-it-needs-to-be balloon containing "Software Updates are available..." text, the one that appears on top of everything regardless of what I am doing, even if I'm playing a game, and demands that I click its X, is the one I mean. It has some kind of icon above its text, a lightbulb possibly? Ok, so we just have different definition of "huge" when it comes to notifications. Having it popup during a game would be annoying (I don't play games anymore, so I didn't know it did that), I remember that happening to me with Win2000 back when I used Windows and played games. I'm not sure if this is a Gnome issue, or something with X11 fullscreen windows. Submit a bug report to Gnome anyway, if it's an X11 thing they should be able to pass it upstream.

      Anyway, my screen resolution is 1920x something I forget. On a 24" wide format screen. The icon is still larger than it needs to be.

      I am not using Beryl although it seemed to work well and never crashed, because I thought it might be the culprit behind my missing panels and workspaces and the like. I removed it and tried Desktop Effects, same problems. Turned off Desktop Effects, same problems. What video card are you using? I seem to remember some Intel cards having issues with wide aspect ratios. Not sure it it would cause any of your problems though.

      Fantastic for you then. I just tried, but your solution didn't fix my problem. You're getting the same error with Azureus?

      The hard part is that there does not seem to be any configuration option that will allow me to remove it. I expect it to be somewhere under the other options for my network configuration but I have yet to find it. I'm pretty sure it's just a panel applet, you can probably just right-click it and remove it from the panel. I'll have to check when I get home to be sure (new job won't let me run Linux on my workstation).
      --
      http://www.mhall119.com
    14. Re:Vista needs the space by amcquay · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seeing that computers rely on user input for the most part, an "if vs. when" situation doesn't reflect too well on the user in this case. I realize that some Linux distros are more complicated than others to configure, but Ubuntu has never given me or any of my fellow Linux fans here in town any trouble. It's pretty easy to get a basic, simple desktop installation up and running.

    15. Re:Vista needs the space by Raistlin77 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Please don't compare him to professional customer support.

      Indeed. mhall doesn't deserve to be insulted in that manner.
    16. Re:Vista needs the space by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Why is the application built into Ubuntu to play music named "Movie Player"?
      Because it plays video as well as audio. I thinking Microsoft would get a little bent if they called it Media Player.
      Most of your other problems sound like a video driver/X11/ Monitor issue. I had some of the same problems.
      1. What video card are you using? Do you have the correct drivers selected. If it is an ATI then the historically bad ATI Linux drivers may be the issue.
      2. What monitor is selected. This is the one that got me. If your Monitor isn't auto detected then you will be stuck at lower resolution and things will be pretty ugly. That is one thing I like better about OpenSuse. With SAX2 if it can not detect your monitor you have a huge library to select from manually. I have the same issue with Windows not detecting my LCD at my office. I use a KVM so it doesn't do the auto detect correctly. I have to plug my monitor directly into my Windows Box and let it detect the monitor then plug it into my kvm!
      Ubuntu does seem to just work for about 99% of the people that use it. Just like Windows seems to also just work for a good number of people. Sometimes Windows Doesn't just work. My sister in law built her husband a new system. She works at EDS in QA and has a degree in IT. She couldn't get WindowsXP to load on that system. She ended up having to slipstream SP2 on to the the XP install.
      Why? Because her new system used a SATA driver and her MSDN XP install didn't support it. Now if she was trying to load Linux all she would have had to do is download a new ISO but with Windows she had to look up how to slipstream SP2 and make a new CD herself.
      When you don't buy hardware with the OS installed you sometimes have to make big effort to make it work right. Doesn't matter if it is Linux or Windows.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    17. Re:Vista needs the space by 3chuck3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Arrggg, Burn your Dell lappie in protest. I will bring the lighter fluid, arrrgggg!!!!

    18. Re:Vista needs the space by mhall119 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, I've noticed this too. I have a 24" monitor at 1920x1200, nvidia 7900gt, and the available screen area just seems smaller on Ubuntu + Gnome than with Windows. The icons are a lot bigger, the system fonts are bigger. Not to mention, the fonts just aren't as smooth. If I make them smaller, no amount of antialiasing or "cleartype" fiddling in Gnome (I forget what it's actually called, sub-pixel rendering I think), will fix it. As it is, I'm stuck with fonts with a slight rainbow halo that are too big. I've noticed that by default icons and fonts are larger on Linux than on Windows. I'm not sure if they just assume you'll be using a higher resolution than you do in Windows (which I do, specifically because the linux fonts are big enough to read at the higher resolution), or if they just want the extra pixels for better detail.

      I now there is sub-pixel rendering available for Linux fonts, but I don't recall what it is. It may not be installed by default on Ubuntu because of patent issues. If you're getting a "rainbow" halo, it may be that the sub-pixel rendering has the pixel order different than what your monitor actually has (BGR instead of RGB). I don't have an LCD monitor, so I'm not very familiar with this. Try asking about it on the Ubuntu forums.
      --
      http://www.mhall119.com
    19. Re:Vista needs the space by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, yes I do consider the solution that in fact you have admitted you used to fix the problem to be the solution, because it fixed the problem.

      If you followed the advice given in that thread, you would not be getting GRUB error 25 anymore. So it was solved.

      In your mind, it seems, the solution was inadequate because the problem was different. The problem wasn't getting a working Ubuntu install with no grub error, it was somehow fixing your unbootable install using the unbootable install itself without you doing anything to help them at all, like it was some kind of game show challenge. Sorry if everyone else was more focused on the realistic problem of fixing your computer than your little brain-teaser "boot the unbootable" challenge for the Ubuntu forums.

      Your problem was fixed. Stop acting like it wasn't. If you go to the mechanic with a blown head gasket, do you complain that they replaced the gasket instead of somehow un-breaking it? Do you complain that your car had to be out for 3 days, when you wanted it magically unbroken instantly? You should some day, because the look you'll get from the mechanic is the look your posts are getting now.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    20. Re:Vista needs the space by Knuckles · · Score: 2, Informative

      ubuntu will automatically start cupsd, even if you don't have a printer

      Which can be easily disabled from the Services config in Administration menu.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    21. Re:Vista needs the space by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When you propose a fix like that, you really ought to try it first. When I right-click on the network tray icon, I get three options (enable networking, connection information (grayed out) and "about"). None of these things will do what he wants, and to suggest that he didn't try even the most seemingly obvious solutions is a little insulting. In mhall's defense, I've always assumed that the networking icon was removable, simply because I'd never felt any desire to remove it. The volume icon can be removed as you describe.

      Note: I'm using Feisty Fawn. I don't know whether the icon was removable in prior versions.

      I don't think the guy with these problems had any right to imply that his expectations are the correct ones. There are all sorts of different expectations for default behavior, his problem with the icons is a matter of personal taste, some of his problems sound like they're due to a bad install, and it strikes me as perfectly reasonable for the movie player to come up when you click on an MP3 (pretty much every media player you install in Windowsland will try to make itself the default for both movies and music). But he seems intelligent and seems to mean well, so his input carries some value.

      Last thing: I noticed you switched a critical couple of words around. He said it "doesn't 'just work'", and you say he says it "just doesn't work". Completely different concepts. "Just works" implies a seamless user experience where the user simply performs the most obvious action and gets the result she expected. "Just doesn't work" implies that, no matter how many different ways you try, no matter how many config files you edit, you simply cannot do what you were hoping to do. There is a huge middle ground between the two, and it sounds like he's living in the "it works, but it doesn't 'just work'" region.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    22. Re:Vista needs the space by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2

      Evaded the diagnosis? You evaded the diagnosis by refusing to answer questions, to help out in any way on your end by providing information. You made it into a little game where they had to guess what was going on, and their correct solutions to your problem were inadequate, but you wouldn't do anything to help find the better solution. It's not just that you didn't like that one specific suggestion, you refused any suggestion. Nothing was good enough for you unless it was "press the secret button underneath your keyboard to magically fix your computer", assuming you wouldn't have responded "Why should I have to push a button?! I thought Ubuntu worked!!!"

      Would "buy a new computer" be a reasonable response? No. Unless the problem was that your hardware was broken, in which case you demanding they somehow un-break your hardware over the internet is what would be unreasonable. How's that for consistancy?

      But that wasn't the response you were given, now was it? So who's posturing? Stop talking about "serious" when your reply to every suggestion was "I shouldn't have to do that, i'm not doing it, ubuntu is crap." Posturing indeed.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    23. Re:Vista needs the space by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2

      That they adhere to that philosophy is a blatant lie, of course, but how was I supposed to know that?

      See, and this is exactly the kind of BS posturing that I'm talking about, that your every thread on this subject is full of. An ubuntu installation does not require proprietary hardware. For fixing your problem with what you claimed you had available a piece of proprietary software may have been necessary. Would you rather they said "you could fix your problem with a windows CD, but that would require using proprietary software so screw off"? No, then you'd bitch about them refusing to help you.

      See you keep saying you got no help, but you did, it just wasn't good enough for you based on a set of criterion that nobody on the forum could have guessed, that nobody thinking you were serious about fixing the problem would expect you to object to. Nobody thought that "ubuntu doesn't need proprietary software" would get translated in your head to "once ubuntu touches a computer, proprietary software is never again useful for anything, including diagnostics of problems with said computer".

      I supposed when I debugged a friend's windows install using a suse live CD, I "proved" Microsoft lies when they say windows doesn't need free software. Or maybe that's not the situation they're talking about. Naw, better to be unreasonable. That would have fixed my friends problem.

      Are we looking at the same thread, liar?

      Yes, liar, the one where you refused to answer questions asked of you. Yes you provided some diagnostics, but when that wasn't enough, and they wanted more, you refused. Because suddenly it wasn't about fixing your problem (as if it ever was), it was about you ranting about how unhelpful they were at magically fixing your problem for you based on secret criterion.

      They wanted me to post my menu.1st. I couldn't get to the OS that had it.
      They suggested I try some commands. I did, and posted those results. NO ONE FOLLOWED UP to that.


      Because they turned out to not be interesting. Diagnosis of a problem is a process. It involves trying things, seeing the results, and then doing other things. Getting upset because after the first bout of attempts nothing comes up and getting bitchy is not part of the process of actually fixing things.

      They wanted to know what version of Windows I had. Sorry, not going to give you a target for ridicule. It doesn't even get to the point where you load an OS, so obviously it can't be relevant. No one to this day has suggested even a remote possibility how that could result in GRUB error 25.

      If you're so smart you know that "obviously it can't be relevent" then why are you asking for help in the first place? It's your "that couldn't help so I'm not answering" attitude that just shows how little this had to do with fixing anything and how much to do with your posturing. And you know what? If the machine reached POST, then the OSes on the system can be relevent. As a direct cause to Error 25? I don't know, I'm not a grub expert, but lets assume not. If the bug was so simple and direct that "Win 95 == grub error 25" then it would have been found. Software problems though are not usually so simple, a problem in one place can cause a problem in another and end up causing an unexpected bug somewhere else that doesn't seem like it could be related. But you stopped the process before it could happen, and just assume the search would have been fruitless.

      Target for ridicule my ass. How many linux users dual-boot into windows? You were just mad your problem hadn't been magically fixed already and were being difficult. Because your posturing was more important than fixing the problem.

      Any my problem was fixable without the CD they were telling me to download and burn, which would have taken me miles out of my way.

      Well I thought you said that a live CD was in fact how you fixed it. Okay, so how did you fix it? Posted it anywhere? And if it would have been so hard to fix your problem the burned CD way by going miles out of your way, I would think it would have been worth being a little more patient on the forums, then.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    24. Re:Vista needs the space by bane2571 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, he means Dell gets paid to put Norton, AOL and various other trial junk that only works in windows on their PCs. No windows = no bonus from those companies.

  2. Astounding. by EveryNickIsTaken · · Score: 5, Funny

    There's two things I need every morning - a cup of coffee, and a blatant "flame Microsoft" Slashdot article. Bravo.

    1. Re:Astounding. by Idbar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People complain too much. They can get a computer with twice memory and twice HDD, thanks to Dell partners and install "FREE" linux on it. But, no, they complain, because the pre-installed Ubuntu is not cheaper!

      Let's talk about half-full / half-empty glasses.

  3. Just buy it with Vista (XP would be better) by Lightjumper · · Score: 4, Insightful

    and download and install Linux on it.. Maybe Dell should include a free linux cd with it..

    1. Re:Just buy it with Vista (XP would be better) by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 4, Insightful

      By telling people to just buy Vista, you are only allowing Microsoft's hold on the software industry to continue. This is all about free choice, and I for one am glad that there are people out there who are keeping an eye on these things and pointing them out to Dell and its customers.

      I'm not eating $225 for 'free choice.' Incidentally, I don't want Ubuntu anyway. What I want is a laptop that I know will work with Linux. As long as the Windows and Linux versions have the same hardware, I'll buy either one since I'm going to wipe and reinstall anyway.

      The point is that this gives Microsoft an unfair advantage over other OS providers and it must be dealt with.

      Love the use of the passive voice there - who's doing the 'dealing'? Not sure what is 'fair' anyway. Do you mean it's a violation of Sherman anti-trust? If not, you're just whining.

      If you want Vista, fine! But if you don't want it, you shouldn't have to buy it. It's that simple!

      And I 'should' have a pony. Unfortunately, the world doesn't work on 'should.' The fact is, Dell does get a lot of revenue from pre-loaded crapware, cost savings by making essentially identical Windows computers in volume, etc. The best you have to hope for is the Linux version doesn't cost *more*, and I do agree $225 is excessive. However, the wipe/reinstall option is always available.

    2. Re:Just buy it with Vista (XP would be better) by mspohr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Rather than Dell having different 'models' of computer with Vista and Linux, what I would like to see is have an option for every Dell to 'customize' it with Linux instead of Vista. When you buy a computer, they currently let you customize it by choosing various hardware and software options. The 'Operating System' customization screen currently only offers the option of different Vista flavors. It would be nice to have a Linux OS option on that page (with an appropriate credit on the cost). This would make Linux pricing transparent... but perhaps they are not interested in making Linux pricing transparent.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    3. Re:Just buy it with Vista (XP would be better) by sumdumass · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One of the reasons they make you do the stupid things over the phone before replacing the hardware is because a lot of time the stupid things work.

      Not everyone with a computer is as competent as you are. Also, there is no way to tell how competent you are outside of listening to you explain it. As most of us already know, certifications and degrees don't necessarily mean you know your stuff. Although the the lack of them are used as reasons not to give out raises and such quite often.

      Generally, what I do is asked for level 2 support and hope I'm not just given to another seat filler in the call center. And I'm not afraid to ask for someone who speaks English as their first language. You still have communications issues but generally not as much.

  4. Fluctuating price by MoonFog · · Score: 4, Informative
    Seems like it's hard to determine the exact difference. From a post in the linked article:

    The price has been updated and the Ubuntu system is now $25 cheaper, thought the RAM Upgrade to 2GB will expire tomorrow. The price discrepancies, and promotions, fluctuate too much..."
    And from a blog linked to from the linked article:

    Update 07/11/07: The given components and prices on the 1420 Notebook have been updated. The price difference is now $25, in favor of the Ubuntu system. Note that the RAM Upgrade expires tomorrow for the 1420N. Among frequent price and component discrepancies, price fluctuations, and Windows favored promotions, Im not sure if Dell is serious about selling open-source [as Dell calls them] systems, rather than generating publicity. Considering that expected sales are at 1% of total systems shipped, and Microsoft could break Dell in half by increasing Windows License costs or decreasing co-marketing funds, I have no choice but to assume the latter.
  5. Re:What's the incentive? by Geek_3.3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Or Dell really DOES make a lot of money off of the crap-o bloatware (6 month's free AOL etc) and this is their way of compensating.

  6. Re:What's the incentive? by Shados · · Score: 5, Informative

    Dell's promotions and stuff is err..."dynamic", to say the least. You can find the same system at like 5 different price depending where you look. So its no surprise that stuff like that would happen.

  7. Re:What's the incentive? by LaughingCoder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There is no conspiracy. They are simply reacting to competitive pressures. They probably determined that Linux laptop sales would not be dramatically higher with the extra RAM promotion since they don't really have any competition for Linux laptops; they are the only game in town among the big vendors. Conversely, in the Windows world I think HP is eating their lunch (HP is heavily discounting their new Santa Rosa dvx5 series), and so they need these discounts to shore up sales.

    --
    The more you regulate a company, the worse its products become.
  8. Re:What's the incentive? by Geek_3.3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    True... it would be interesting, if somewhat complicated, to see the price fluctuations over a couple month period to see how the prices really stack up.

  9. I don't see a problem here by Sunkist · · Score: 3, Informative

    Other than stating the upgrades to windows are FREE! You still save $45. What I am missing?

    Inspiron Notebook 1420 N
    Intel® Core(TM) 2 Duo T5250 (1.5GHz/667Mhz FSB/2MB cache)
    Ubuntu version 7.04
    2GB Shared Dual Channel3 DDR2 at 667MHz
    Size: 160GB2 SATA Hard Drive (5400RPM)

    Price: $774

    Intel® Core(TM) 2 Duo T5250 (1.5GHz/667Mhz FSB/2MB cache)
    Genuine Windows® Vista Home Basic Edition
    Anti-glare, widescreen 14.1 inch display (1280x800)
    FREE! 2GB2 Shared Dual Channel3 DDR2 at 667MHz
    FREE! 160GB4 SATA Hard Drive (5400RPM)
    24X CD writer/DVD Combo Drive
    Intel Graphics Media Accelerator X3100
    Dell Wireless 1390 802.11g Mini-Card

    Price:$819

    --
    No, Vern. They just let him in.
    1. Re:I don't see a problem here by MoonFog · · Score: 4, Informative

      Those were the prices quoted in the original Slashdot story that was about Ubuntu computers being $50 cheaper. A post further down talks about configuring it and it "now" is $225 more (free hardware upgrades etc) and then ANOTHER post even further down mentions that it's back to being $25 cheaper.. I'm getting a headache just trying to follow this.

  10. DUH! by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I love how these "revelations" happen far later when the rest of us that looked at it saw right away that the "specials" or "instant rebates" only apply to the windows machines.

    There has been people here on Slashdot posting for a few months that the Open source and now linux laptops are in fact more expensive by around $200.00.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  11. Statistics by ilovegeorgebush · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Torture numbers, and they'll confess to anything." ~Gregg Easterbrook

    I'm quite impressed how the (quite obvious) spin was placed on this claim. It's only $275 more if you WANT to upgrade.
    Still, i'm definitely disappointed in Dell; i'd have liked that upgrade for free too...(Although Vista would need it to Pagefile usage, whereas Ubuntu would use it for the hoards of FOSS that's available...)

  12. Re:What's the incentive? by MoonFog · · Score: 5, Funny

    Considering it's already down (see my other post in this thread), I guess it's safe to say that Dell's dynamic pricing moves faster than Slashdot's submission acceptance system.

  13. AKA Microsoft is paying for the upgrade by haplo21112 · · Score: 2

    Or rather Dell is getting a kickback from microsoft that is paying for the upgrade.

    --
    Power Corrupts,Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, leaving one person(group)in charge is absolutely corrupt.
  14. Re:What's the incentive? by FlyByPC · · Score: 3, Funny

    Considering it's already down (see my other post in this thread), I guess it's safe to say that Dell's dynamic pricing moves faster than Slashdot's submission acceptance system.
    It's the Slashdot corollary to the Cartoon Law of Falling Anvils (Law IX):
    Everything moves faster than Slashdot submissions.
    --
    Paleotechnologist and connoisseur of pretty shiny things.
  15. And this arouses suspicion because...? by Mr.+Roadkill · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Dell are hardly known for offering sane or consistent pricing across models or market segments - try browsing their website some time as a home user, then as various classes of business customer. Why should it come as any surprise that they've omitted a special offer from a machine with a non-standard OS?

    Personally, I have no plans to upgrade to Vista any time soon - at least not at home. If faced with the prospect of getting a machine with Ubuntu at $X, or a machine with double the RAM and a bigger hard drive with Vista at $X, I'd take the machine with Vista, thank you very much. Shrink the partition as far as practical, install Ubuntu, and you're ahead - you've got the higher-spec machine, AND the ability to boot into something that the Dull PhoneMonkeys won't hang up over. Okay... that's a path a geek would take, not a regular consumer, but I doubt at this time that there would be very many non-geeks opting for Ubuntu over windows anyway on a new Dell.

    Besides... if you're going to criticise Vista, you should at least have first-hand experience of what it is that you're criticising.

  16. Last time I checked.... by oliverthered · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Last time I checked you could disagree with the EULA, send the Vista disk back to M$ and get your money back and then install ubuntu. Why not do that?

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  17. Nothing like a good knee-jerk in the morning... by Dekortage · · Score: 5, Informative

    So Dell's base 1420 with Ubuntu costs $747 with these specs:

    • Intel® Core(TM) 2 Duo T5250 (1.5GHz/667Mhz FSB/2MB cache)
    • Ubuntu version 7.04
    • Anti-glare, widescreen 14.1 inch display (1280x800)
    • Intel Graphics Media Accelerator X3100
    • 2GB Shared Dual Channel DDR2 at 667MHz
    • 160GB SATA Hard Drive (5400RPM)
    • 24X CD Burner/DVD Combo Drive
    • Intel® 3945 802.11a/g Mini-card
    • No Camera
    • 56Whr Lithium Ion Battery (6 cell)
    • Integrated High Definition Audio

    Meanwhile, Dell's Windows equivalent has exact same specs, except for these differences:

    • Genuine Windows® Vista Home Basic Edition instead of Ubuntu
    • Dell Wireless 1390 802.11g Mini-Card instead of the Intel 802.11a/g card

    And the Windows version costs $869. So the Ubuntu version is $122 cheaper and has a better WiFi card.

    Remind me again... what did you step in?

    --
    $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
  18. FFS, isn't this a no-brainer? by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Isn't this a no-brainer?

    1. Buy the PC that gives you the best hardware for the lowest price. If that means taking a Windows PC that has "free" extra memory and a bigger hard disk drive then do it.

    2. Shrink the Windows partition (that extra disk space is a boon), install Ubuntu and/or other operating systems of your choice.

    3. Go about your business as normal.

    4. If you ever have to speak to Dell tech support, you have the additional benefit of being able to tell them that you're using a Windows system (true), and them not giving you the cold shoulder when you tell them that you're using Ubuntu, etc.

    5. If you sell your PC at sometime in the future you give yourself a more attractive package to sell and thus recoup more of your initial sale price. More RAM, more disk space, Windows Vista Home all have a value, and the Vista Home alone may make a huge difference to the resale price on eBay. Remember, 90 percent of PC users won't even have heard of Linux, so why cut them out of your resale equation?

    Dell is simply trying to protect its standard business model, which includes making money from pre-installing offers from third parties (such as ISPs and AV vendors) on their Windows installations. There's no reason why you can't let them do that and still benefit from their reluctance to abandon that model.

    Saving $50 (or is it now $25?) if it means half as much memory and half as much disk space (1GB/80GB vs 2GB/160GB) seems to be a false economy.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  19. CORRECTION by Dekortage · · Score: 3, Informative

    Sorry, I transposed numbers on the Ubuntu price -- the machine is $774, not $747, so the difference is $95, not $122.

    My apologies. But Dell's Ubuntu system is still cheaper.

    --
    $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
  20. Re:What's the incentive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No conspiracy here. Dell has very odd pricing plans, bonuses, sales, and specials that change all of the time. You can configure the same computer from three different locations on the Dell website and come up with 5 different prices. They typically offer "upgrades like memory, 19in LCD, HD etc on bundled deals that are even cheaper then without the upgrades. This is regardless of the OS the machine comes with.

    Given the choices on their various buying portals, it should be no surprise for advertising sake, they have very specific configurations for a specific price that are cheaper then what you could together using configuring their own. These same specific machines with upgrades are what ends up in the mailed out advertisements and the back of magazines and may even be a loss leader for them but it gets people to the site in hopes they can get an up sell as well.

    Some don't like the choices of configurations, some do. For those that do a little leg work on Dells site, you can get a really good combo deal. If you want to buy one with minimal effort and do not feel like browsing around, you can do that as well. Dell is trying to maximize profit AND cater to the person with some extra time that does some research. I view that the same way as a grocery store putting smaller higher priced items near the register lines or selling a cold 20oz bottle of Pepsi for $1.29 and a warm 2 liter bottle for $0.89 back in the pop isle. You have a choice, convenience or lowest price.

  21. Actually it is about a $600 cheaper by codepunk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1. Does not come with all that crap ware installed add $200 in savings for a great deal of time cleaning the trash off of the system.

    2. Add office professional (ships with open office) I am sure that is at least a $200 savings.

    3. Scratch having to take the machine into a shop every three months to clean all the spyware, crap etc out of the machine to make it actually work again. There is another few hundred bucks $200

    I did not even list the other software it ships with and the equivalents would likely run you into the thousands.

    --


    Got Code?
  22. Moving price targets by Dekortage · · Score: 2, Funny

    And, checking the Windows price again, it's dropped $50 from when I checked it before (for a price difference of $45).

    I give up. Maybe if I check again in 20 minutes, Dell's Windows systems really will cost less than Ubuntu.

    --
    $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
  23. Re:What's the incentive? by Dr.+Smoove · · Score: 2, Informative

    The current Lenovo T60's are totally Linux compatible. I love mine.

    --
    "If you plant ice, you're gonna harvest wind."
  24. Who knows what a Dell costs? by dpbsmith · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Dell's prices fluctuate more rapidly and more widely than the Dow Jones Industrial Average. Identical systems may vary by significant amounts depending on whether you talk to a "home office" or "small business" rep... or whether you talk to them on Tuesday or Wednesday... or whether you get the price on the Web or over the phone or in a mailing.

    I'm not sure anyone knows what a Dell costs unless they are a business negotating a deal for a few thousand of them.

  25. No biggie by PalmKiller · · Score: 2, Informative

    It makes sense, you gotta have 2gb of ram for vista to even perform marginally well...and it requires more disk space too.

  26. Bought my Dell-Ubuntu Desktop by World.Pop(MPAA) · · Score: 5, Informative

    Being relatively a noob to Linux I decided to purchase a desktop with Ubuntu from Dell and have nothing but great things to say about it. I usually build my own computers, which is an easy process for me using Windows because it's easy to guarantee combatibility with the OS. But now with Vista out, my fears of losing all my purchased apps, plus a desire not to get locked into another cost ineffective software solution lead me to trying Ubuntu.

    In the past, I've tried different distrobutions (SUSE, Mandrake, Red Hat, Slackware, among others) and have always taken it off my system because some annoying little hardware incompatibility caused me problems. So, while Dell may be charging a little extra for Ubuntu, I think there's something to be said about getting a Linux computer that will "just work" right out of the box.

    I also have to mention that I don't feel cheated. I have a great system, 20" Widescreen Flat Panel, 2 GB of RAM, Core 2 Duo (1.X can't remember), the NVIDIA GFX (7300 Lite or something) card, 250 GB SATA HDD, DVD+-RW Dual Layer and another DVD-ROM as well. As some of the other posters had mentioned, this may have not been the "perfect deal" but I only paid about $1000 for the whole system. To me this is a sight better than paying $900 for the same machine using Vista and then having to repurchase Dreamweaver, Flash and Fireworks; does VS 2005 work on Vista?

    Funny enough though, while Vista's having all these compatibility issues with the previous generation's software, I'm using the old Studio 8 suite on Linux under WINE and it's running faster than it did in Windows.

  27. I call schenanagans by ProppaT · · Score: 2, Informative


    Some anti-MS or pro-Linux person, whichever, was obviously sitting on Dell's website waiting for this to be the case.

    Anyone who goes to Dell's site or follows any of the bargain sites (fatwallet, slickdeals, techbargains, etc) knows that Dell deals change on a daily basis. One day you'll be able to buy a PC cheap without a monitor, the next day the purchase will require purchase of a monitor, the next day they'll throw in a RAM upgrade out of nowhere. I know last week there was a deal for a Linux box for around $250 off of Dell's site. They do this to keep people checking back. When someone sees a deal that looks good, they'll eventually make an impulse buy.

    This isn't news worthy at all.

    --
    Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
  28. Re:What's the incentive? by PhoenixK7 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Since the Ubuntu price is now back at the $50 less mark, it makes me wonder whether this was just a glitch where one machine was updated first and then the other came later in the day, or whether they're actually listening. On some levels, it does actually look like they're listening (Installing Ubuntu, and the ideastorm site indicates junkware-less machines are coming, among other things), and frankly it's a welcome change. How many other gigantic computer manufacturers display this sort of behavior. When was the last time you say HP jump and fix something because of a Slashdot article just getting posted?

  29. Not anymore. by Urza9814 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was actually shopping for an Ubuntu laptop for my girlfrind last night and noticed this, but as of this morning they are offering the upgrades on the Ubuntu version as well.

    She's gonna be getting a vista one anyways and just reformatting it though. The only available 15" screen with Ubuntu doesn't give you any decent hardware to choose from.

  30. Theres something wrong with the tag line by jskline · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There is something wrong with the tag line. If they want to offer the free upgrade on a windows machine only, then it doesn't say that the Ubuntu configuration costs more. You just don't get the free upgrade. Did you really need the upgrade in the first place??? Remember the Linux boxes are very much more conservative in demands than Windows is so that kind of "moots" that out.

    Misleading tag.

    --
    All content in this message is copyright (c) 2008. All rights reserved. RIAA is prohibited here.
  31. Three Things To Think About Dell Win Upgrades by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2, Funny

    1. Price for upgrade to 160 GB due to how much space WinVista burns up on your hard drive with virus-prone stuff you won't realize is installed - $0

    2. Price for upgrade to memory due to how lousy an OS WinVista is - $0

    3. Realizing you got more by choosing Ubuntu Linux instead - Priceless

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --