Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Intel Core 2 Updates, QX6850 and E6750

Posted by CmdrTaco on from the reminds-me-of-a-daft-punk-song dept.

An anonymous reader writes "As AMD's Barcelona approaches, the price war between AMD and Intel continues. To spice things up a bit this week, Intel is throwing into the ring a number of new processors, refreshing the Core2 line-up. HEXUS reviews the high-end QX6850 and mid-range E6750: 'Now is a golden time for anyone looking to buy a new CPU, whether Intel or AMD. The latest round of price cuts means you can now get an incredible level of processing performance for little more than £100. But if your need to buy is not urgent, remember that Intel and its big rival are each promising new processors before the end of the year — AMD with K10 quad-core and Intel with 45nm Penryn-derived CPUs.'"

8 of 105 comments (clear)

  1. Unasked, unanswered question by ceeam · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Have they fixed those bugs?

    1. Re:Unasked, unanswered question by bernywork · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes and no,

      Some of the bugs will be fixed, others won't. Every CPU has bugs, it's just a fact of life. These things are designed by humans, it's just going to happen. CPU errata happens with Intel (This is the Core2 link) and AMD. None of this is a major threat to most users, and they get worked around by most people pretty quickly. Microsoft have released fixes for the Core2 issue, as have Apple. I don't know whether there has been an update to the kernel for these yet, but I am sure they would get back ported by your distribution.

      There is a note here and here regarding the Core 2 bugs, I think one of these might have even become a slashdot article at one point. The two links here both are referring to Linus' comment of it being "Totally insignificant", which given that he worked for Transmeta and knows a lot more about how the industry works, I would be putting a bit of faith in his statement.

      As another poster said, keep up to date on your BIOS revs, as CPU microcode does have fixes for this stuff too.

      Berny

      --
      Curiosity was framed; ignorance killed the cat. -- Author unknown
    2. Re:Unasked, unanswered question by kestasjk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So, I suppose you will blame the BIOS or the OS or anything _but_ _your_choice_ of CPUs when the security-related bugs that promise to allow any script kid to compromise your servers in unprecedented ways are exploited.

      For me, choosing any CPU that has known security bugs to be used on any connected computer is reason enough to be fired. What security bugs? I don't know where people get the idea that there were security bugs in the errata Intel released. Theo said that out of 50 bugs "2-3" were "potentially exploitable", but as far as I know no-one has given so much as a proof of concept.

      Saying that these bugs "allow any script kid to compromise your servers in unprecedented ways" is totally over the top.
      • No-one has shown that any of the bugs contain any sort of vulnerability,
      • no-one has shown that any of the hypothetical vulnerabilities allow remote code execution,
      • no-one has shown that any of the hypothetical remote code execution vulnerabilities could be exploited in realistic scenarios,
      • certainly nothing has been made available to script kids,
      • and I don't even know what "in unprecedented ways" means in this context.

      It is just FUD, until someone can actually point out a realistic code execution vulnerability, or even a PoC, even one that could be exploited in unrealistic scenarios, even a DoS, an idea, anything!
      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
  2. Another review and benchmarks by mikemuch · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,2158619 ,00.asp

  3. QX6850 costs $999USD by Organic+User · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just in case anyone is interested in buying a new QX6850 which features 3Ghz 8mb cache quad core processor with 1,333MHz FSB. It is going to cost you $999.

  4. More Details, Analysis Here, HH Review by MojoKid · · Score: 5, Informative

    HotHardware also has a full review up right here. They were able to take the new quad-core up to over 3.7GHz and show power consumption numbers for all the high end chips as well.

  5. Price cuts by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Just as a point of interest, when I was looking for new components around a fortnight ago, suppliers were were already listing high-end chips in the forthcoming E6x50 series at lower prices than even the mid-range chips from the older E6x00 range. The E6600 has been near the sweet spot on the price/performance curve for quite a while now, so if you're looking for a cheap upgrade, it looks like they'll be practically giving away E6600s and E6700s for as long as they last.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    1. Re:Price cuts by Emetophobe · · Score: 4, Informative

      There's a planned price cut for Intel on July 22nd. http://www.vr-zone.com/index.php?i=4976

      Q6600 2.4 1066 $530 $266
      E6850 3.0 1333 - $266
      E6750 2.66 1333 - $183
      E6550 2.33 1333 - $163
      E6540 2.33 1333 - $163

      The quad core (Q6600) is getting a ~50% price cut.