Slashdot Mirror


Magnetic Wobbles Cause Hard Drive Failure

An anonymous reader writes "According to this report by IT PRO, scientists working at the University of California have discovered the main reason of hard drive failure. According to researchers, some materials used in hard drives are better at damping spin precession than others. Spin precession of magnetic material effects its neighbors' polarity and this can spread and cause sections of hard drives to spontaneously change polarity and lose data. This is known as a magnetic avalanche. So next time Windows fails to start, you'll know why!"

36 of 276 comments (clear)

  1. Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Pretty sure this will also keep Linux from starting!

    1. Re:Sigh by larry+bagina · · Score: 5, Funny

      yes, but the gpl v3 fixes this limitation.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    2. Re:Sigh by martin-boundary · · Score: 5, Funny

      Only if you're making the assumption that Linux is running from a hard disk installation. Plenty of linuxes are actually run from a cd drive, in which case the poster is correct: this is really mainly a Windows issue.

    3. Re:Sigh by jd · · Score: 3, Funny

      The tracks can wobble on independent threads under BeOS.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    4. Re:Sigh by Tim+C · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm sorry, but you're *really* clutching at straws there. I personally don't know of anyone who runs Linux from CD. I appreciate that you can, and that some people almost certainly do, but if they're anything but a tiny minority of users I'll eat my PC.

      You're also ignoring that every OS X system will be running from a hard drive, so it's as much an OS X issue. And a *BSD one, a Solaris one, and every other OS.

      Mindless Windows bashing just is not cool, and only serves to lessen the impact of genuine gripes.

    5. Re:Sigh by cp.tar · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In all honesty, while on /. it may seem as an unnecessary swipe at Windows (if there can be such a thing here), the closing sentence only mirrors the fact that Windows are still on a vast majority of computers.

      None of us regularly get phonecalls such as "oh, my Linux won't start, OMG, what I'm gonna do?". We do get them related to Windows, though.

      So while I'm just guessing (and assuming stupidity and not malice), I'd say the OP typed Windows instead of $OS_OF_CHOICE or whatever.

      Besides, it's obvious that the issue affects every and any OS, since it's a hardware issue; so even if the swipe at Windows was intentional, it was supposed to be humorous. Yet the /. mob swarms in on obvious trivialities, thus proving that geeks are just as easily baited as the rest. Yay.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    6. Re:Sigh by somersault · · Score: 5, Funny

      Work?

      --
      which is totally what she said
    7. Re:Sigh by bhiestand · · Score: 5, Funny

      I've always liked you, but I have to recommend that you be permanently banned from slashdot for suggesting such a thing.

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
    8. Re:Sigh by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Funny

      How is that any different to full windows?

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
  2. First questions to mind: by UncleTogie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Which materials/processes dampen the "avalanche" best? Which hard drive manufacturers use those materials/processes?

    --
    Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
  3. Re:Question by untaken_name · · Score: 5, Funny

    It doesn't effect Windows at all, actually. It might, however, affect Windows.

  4. As my high school music teacher always said... by RealGrouchy · · Score: 5, Funny

    "So next time Windows fails to start, you'll know why!" It's a bad carpenter who blames his tools.

    - RG>
    --
    Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
  5. Which University of California?! by tutwabee · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's lovely how both Slashdot post and the original article state that scientists at the "University of California" discovered this. This could mean the University of California, Berkeley, UCLA, UCSD, or others. The website link is to the University of California, Santa Cruz website so I assume that's where the scientists were located.

    1. Re:Which University of California?! by background+image · · Score: 3, Funny

      I heard that they discovered how to "fix" vampires at UC Sunnydale.

      Well I, for one, welcome our new, neutered vampire overlords...

    2. Re:Which University of California?! by kf6auf · · Score: 4, Informative

      Here is a link to the UC Santa Cruz press release and the professor is indeed there (I'm sure you can find him). A little spiel from me: I took a class on nanomagnetism this past term and definitely learned about this effect for individual spins and for domains and it has been known for quite some time. Without reading the PRL article because I'm off campus and don't have a personal subscription ($$$ and, hey, this is /.), my guess is that the model explains the why a lot better than existing ones, and how we get from individual precessing spins to the average spin of the entire domain without brute-force computing it, which is nearly impossible. That being said, different ferromagnetic materials are very different in their interactions between spins and orbits between nearby spins and orbits and so I'm not sure without looking into it how many different ferromagnetic materials this applies too.

  6. Re:Question by Speare · · Score: 5, Informative
    affect

    When 'effect' is used as a verb, it means 'to create.' The article writeup has the same primary-school error. It's not that hard, people.

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
  7. SOME types of failures... by DTemp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So this claims that most hard drive *failure* is caused by this. Now, I'm sure this causes isolated data loss here and there, and maybe I've had a different experience than the average person, but most of my hard drive failures in the past had loud screeching or clicking noises. I dont think this was caused by magnetic spin!

    1. Re:SOME types of failures... by IndigoParadox · · Score: 3, Informative

      It seems possible that this magnetic affectation could be a cause of spontaneous damage the hard drive servo information.

      This would cause one of the clicking-type malfunctions which you described, as that "clicking" you hear is the noise the head assembly makes when the drive is rapidly moving it back and forth across the platter attempting to get a fix.

    2. Re:SOME types of failures... by RallyNick · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hard drives that are used 24/7 fail because their mechanical (moving) parts are built from the cheapest materials that would last for the warranty period. Most of my Western Digital drives develop a noticeable "whine" within a year or two and typically fail soon after that. The "whine" sounds somewhat like an F1 engine running at max rpm, just not as loud (you can hear it if you get your ear close to the drive), and it definitely sounds like there's metal-on-metal friction in the bearings (not good). Better bearings are slightly harder to manufacture and thus no longer used in consumer products. Afterall we're supposed to get products that break and need to be replaced often to keep the manufacturers in bussiness.

  8. Hmmm... by Edward+Teach · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So next time Windows fails to start, you'll know why!

    Pretty sure that's not the main reason. :-(

    --

    Setting his threshold to 5, Sparky eliminated most of the trolls on /.

  9. So do lots of other things by Whuffo · · Score: 5, Interesting
    When I think of hard drive failure, it's almost always due to a drive hardware failure. Bad motors, bad chips on the controller board. Another popular failure is due to flaky firmware on the drive controller causing the tracking information on the platter to become overwritten.

    Magnetic wobbles? Let me see a show of hands - how many have had their data spontaneously change due to this phenomenon. Yeah, I thought so...

    1. Re:So do lots of other things by DerekLyons · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't see anywhere in TFA that specifies this is the cause of complete hard drive failure. It is, however, a very credible mechanism for the slow increase in bad sectors that is typical of many hard drives. (You young un's may not have heard of this, or seen it, as the hardware/software conspires to hide it from you now-a-days.) I have seen this eventually lead to failure (I.E. unuseability) of a drive.
       
      Since (I would assume) a given manufacturer would tend to use the same materials across a broad span of drive models, this could also be a reasonable explanation for why some manufacturers have reps for 'bad drives'.

  10. Misleading title by Tribbin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Should be something like:

    Magnetic Wobbles Cause Data Loss

    --
    If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
  11. Windows won't start?? by suv4x4 · · Score: 5, Funny

    So next time Windows fails to start, you'll know why!

    Because... I didn't install it?

    1. Re:Windows won't start?? by MikeBabcock · · Score: 3, Funny

      Congrats, you've figured out the key to enjoying your new PC :-)

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  12. I'm disappointed. by Khaed · · Score: 5, Funny

    This has been up at least an hour.

    So next time Windows fails to start, you'll know why!

    Where are all the jokes about this? Seriously! A bad hard drive is not the only reason Windows won't start. It's not even in the top ten. I've had Windows not start maybe once in ten years over a hard drive. I've had it not start for a variety of other reasons... well the number is greater than one, but I don't keep count (I bet twitter did, though).

    C'mon you slackers, it was a slow day, where are my +5 funny posts about the ineptitude of Microsoft?

  13. Re:Question by nocomment · · Score: 3, Funny

    Replace the HD or hand in your geek card please.

    --
    /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
    /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
  14. This could explain where my files go.... by sssssss27 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I backup all of my DVDs to my computer because I have a notorious habit of losing them. Every once in a while I'll go to watch a movie that I swear I've backed up and can't find on my computer. So at least now I can blame it on some science thing and not just my failing memory. Every day science makes one less thing your fault, lol.

  15. How about a bewolf cluster of failed drives!... by Cafe+Alpha · · Score: 3, Funny

    No that's not it. In Soviet Russia, you fail hard drive... No. Where's that goatse link?

  16. Re:As usual the slashdot summary is wrong by mshurpik · · Score: 3, Insightful

    >It seems to me that years ago, slashdot authors did more than dump articles into summaries

    Your memory is faulty.

  17. Not "the" but "a lesser known" by mritunjai · · Score: 4, Informative

    This phenomenon is only one of the several ways for bit rot to creep in and make you lose data.

    In bit rot, bits on HDD spontaneously change. It is generally not observable and the results are often blamed on applications and/or OS.

    It is lesser known because in the current state of technology, the aplications, OS, filesystem and even RAID can't even detect the problem much less solve them. (RAID doesn't work because it can't tell which copy is right and which is wrong. It assumed what it got from disk is what it wrote to it.)

    ZFS (Solaris/SUN filesystem) solves this problem by using end-to-end checksums. However, it exists for few platforms only.

    --
    - mritunjai
    1. Re:Not "the" but "a lesser known" by Brane2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't see how such an error would get around ECC and checksums on each sector that the drive verifies and updates by itself.

      Once few bits in a sectors would flip, that sector would be invalid...

  18. The real reason by auroran · · Score: 3, Interesting

    We all know the real reason here. It's all those perpendicular bits on the dance floor getting drunk and falling down.

    They were all fairly calm when this footage was shot but the wildness ensued soon after.
    http://www.hitachigst.com/hdd/research/recording_h ead/pr/PerpendicularAnimation.html

  19. Re:How timely... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't get myself whether this will improve Windows though. As you mention, Windows itself tends to eat files just for the fun of it. I've lost more drives in addition to sporadic data from Windows then ALL the hard drives that have died on me on all my machines in the past 10 years.

    My favorite was using Windows Update "Hardware, Optional." I had a Western Digital PCI card because my motherboard BIOS didn't support large drives (>137gb or whatever) and that was the only way to do it (nowadays, clipped drives are actually read properly). Anyways, the card worked fine, I accessed the files regularly; 4 200gb drives hooked up to that card. On checking for security fixes one day as I reguarly do since I was running IE6 and XP, I noticed the (0) ahd changed to a (1). Saw there was a driver update. Hmmm....

    Yes, I was suscipious. Yes, I know if it ain't broke, don't fix it, i.e. don't update your BIOS if everything works fine sort of philosophy. But it was OFFICIAL man. You also have to remember, this is after MS giving all that PR about WHQL or official approved drivers and software. And this was being pushed on MS's own site as an approved update. It was like Microsoft was saying, "Just do it. Your machine'll run better." It was, after all, a cleared driver coming from the main company itself. I even hated using Windows (although not as much as I hate it nowadays) and read /. and agree with the anti-MS sentiment and used to be a Mac user.

    I installed the driver. It required a reboot. I rebooted. And XP promptly went about "fixing" allocation errors etc. on all the drives...Drive Check or whatever it's now called on startup popped up to fix "corrupt" files and "allocation errors." Hmmm...I was suspicious again, was going to pull the power plug (4 drives after all, going through each one after the other), then decided, "Nah, approved update."

    I never felt stupider in front of a computer. Take the shock of losing hardware or data, and multiply by 100. I was, quite literally, ashamed, and on the edge of just giving up on computers entirely despite using them for over a decade. The update for some reason made the drives unreadable from their then current state, so drive check was set on them, which FARKED the master tables totally. The data itself is there, but without the tables, nothing corresponds. I still have the drives in the corner--partial files, file name mismatches, it's horrific. The filenames no longer corresponds with the correct files, i.e. file1 now points to part of data from file3 which was 4gb but now 1.3gb.

    Shame turned to sheer and complete smoldering anger. The result? It accelerated me setting up a big NAS setup by over a year. I will not upgrade to Vista. I will not buy another XP box or MS upgrade or MS software at all. I now use Ubuntu or OpenBSD on all my new machines. I am migrating my old Win98 machines to Linux boxes. I will have a few XP machines for like web viewing and crap and since I just haven't really gotten around to figuring out what I want to do with them, but I dread the data on them such that I now backup even non-critical files, because the hassle of simply just redownloading or restoring them or reinstalling or recovering or re-encoding a large CD collection or the sheer inconvenience of it all just outweighs the cost of getting 2 drives instead of 1. (I backed up critical stuff regularly before this experience.) And any business machines, which I usually have 1 or 2 in the set that has XP on it simply because I felt it needed to be there, is strictly not now. I'd rather buy 2 500gb and mirror data periodically then send 1 penny on Windows or MS software (and I haven't bought their hardware either despite liking MS keyboards and webcams...I half think that the keyboard is going to explode or the webcam suddenly going to have a stepper motor or something hidden in it that's going to switch on and follow me into the shower or something--I'm that paranoid, half-assed jokingly cynical about any MS product).

  20. Re:Interesting but WRONG conclusion. by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 3, Funny

    I would not call this a mechanism for "hard disk failure."

    I sure as hell wouldn't call it a "hard disk success"

    --
    I don't therefore I'm not.
  21. bearings overheating by phatvw · · Score: 3, Informative

    Agreed. I'd bet that the mechanical components, specifically the ball-bearings in the drive motor, are more likely to overheat and fail. In addition power-regulation/power-supply components such as large power transistors and resistors on the logic board are likely to fail.

    After 5 years of solid running, a lot of hard drives begin to sound different. Guess what, thats the bearings wearing out... More intersting stuff http://storagemojo.com/?p=378