Slashdot Mirror


$298 Wal-Mart PC Has OO.org, No Crapware

cristarol writes "Wal-Mart has begun selling a $298 PC (Everex IMPACT GC3502). It comes with Windows Vista Home Basic and OpenOffice.org 2.2, as well as a complete lack of crapware: 'Users accustomed to being bombarded with trialware offers and seeing their would-be pristine Windows desktops littered with shortcuts to AOL and other applications will likely be pleased at their absence from the GC3502.' The machine is targeted at the back-to-school market. The hardware is nothing to write home about: a 1.5GHz Via C7 with 1GB of RAM and integrated graphics, but as Ars points out, it should be more than capable of performing basic tasks." Dell sells a low-end PC through Wal-Mart for $200 more, and one assumes it is loaded with crapware. Anybody know for sure?

31 of 422 comments (clear)

  1. Funny by abigsmurf · · Score: 4, Funny

    Strange how the headline doesn't mention it comes with Windows Vista installed...

    1. Re:Funny by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 5, Funny

      Strange how the headline doesn't mention it comes with Windows Vista installed... Yeah, so much for "No Crapware"...
      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
  2. Wh else looked at it and thought... by iknownuttin · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Ooooo, I wonder what Linux distro to put on it?!"

    --
    I prefer Flambe as apposed flamebait.
  3. "Eco-friendly" computer by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I noticed that the manufacturer's product manager threw in the word "eco-friendly" to describe the computer. Did they really have efficiency in mind when they developed the computer, or is this just part of the recent trend (a la "no carbs/trans fats") to label anything and everything as being good for the environment?

    I guess a computer that has little or nothing to it also doesn't use much power either. But then, my Game Boy is more eco-friendly.

    1. Re:"Eco-friendly" computer by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Didn't you get the memo? In modern terminology, "eco-friendly" means being wasteful in the most efficient way possible.

      Driving a Hummer once per year --> terrorist.
      Driving a Prius 100 miles each weekend to bounce between parties --> eco-friendly.

      Lighting up a tiny studio apartment with incandescent bulbs --> terrorist.
      Lighting up a mansion full of empty rooms with CFLs --> eco-friendly.

      Running non-eco-friendly computer 8 hrs per day --> terrorist.
      Running eco-friendly computer non-stop --> eco-friendly.

      Suggesting alternate method to contain global warming that requires little effort from most people --> terrorist.
      Requiring everyone to adhere to a set of rules banning devices deemed inefficient --> eco-friendly.

      Glad I could clear that up.

  4. If it stops them from getting hooked on WOW... by jeffmeden · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The computer needs to do web browsing, email, and word processing. The occasional song or pic shared with friends is to be expected too. However, as long as the hardware is shitty enough to prevent the owner from becoming hooked on WOW, Eve, or any other time-vacuum, then it will probably be the best $500 the parents DIDNT spend to get their kid a better computer. And with all that free time, they just might do their homework! For the education market, this product gets an A+ from me.

    1. Re:If it stops them from getting hooked on WOW... by goldspider · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I concur 100%. If I'm going to buy my kid a new PC (big "if"), it will have ZERO bells and whistles. If he/she wants to play games on it, the upgrade costs are coming out of their pocket. As a parent who will likely be paying for their college, I don't feel obliged to provide for their entertainment.

      In fact, while I'm thinking of it, this PC might be a good buy for my parents who badlu need to upgrade their old workhorse. Those specs will run XP just fine!

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    2. Re:If it stops them from getting hooked on WOW... by markov_chain · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think you're being slightly pessimistic here.

      All this stuff runs just fine even on 512M of RAM. I use one such machine for work, which includes most of the stuff you listed (word processing, web browsing, matlab, lots of compiling, lots of PDF, image editing, etc.), and it runs just fine even with dual monitors.

      Let's not even go into the "uphill both ways" stories of what computing power we used in college to do these exact same things.

      I think the GP is right, the kids will whine because they can't play games. Been there, done that :)

      --
      Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
    3. Re:If it stops them from getting hooked on WOW... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Insightful
      1 Gig ought to be enough for anyone. Heh.

      Seriously, though, if the choice is between a student having this $300 computer, and a student having no computer, which do you think is better?

      Not every parent can afford to spend $1000 or even $500.

      I'm sure accountants, geologists and every other field have their specific apps. These aren't tweaked to run on low-end hardware.
      Yes they are. Any app designed for business is tweaked to run on a variety of systems, programs are designed to run on systems that were state-of-the-art more than five years prior. The business upgrade cycle used to be around three years, but now it's getting larger every day -- and businesses tend not to buy top-of-the-line systems anyway.

      Back to educational use -- very few disciplines of study require apps that really use a lot of cycles. And when they do, typically those apps are run on university computers, not students' PCs. Those apps are also typically used for high-level research, not basic undergrad stuff.
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  5. Has VIA improved? by athloi · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Last time I checked, their CPUs were erratic, their chipsets flaky and their reputation mainly derived from making cash register and micro-PC machines that were for one-app use and no manic power user antics. Has VIA improved?

  6. Comparison by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Informative

    Dell sells a low-end PC through Wal-Mart for $200 more, and one assumes it is loaded with crapware. Anybody know for sure? Well, from the product page of the $500 "Dell Dimension E521 Desktop PC w/ AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core Processor":

    • # Microsoft Windows Vista Home Premium Edition
    • # NVIDIA GeForce 6150 integrated graphics
    • # Dell USB keyboard and USB 2-button mouse
    • # Integrated 10/100 Ethernet
    • # Integrated 7.1-channel audio
    • # 56k PCI data/fax modem
    • # Microsoft Works 8.5
    • # Adobe Acrobat Reader 7.0
    • # Roxio Creator Basic
    • # McAfee Security 30-day trial
    • # Earthlink application software
    • # Windows Vista PC-Restore
    • # 1-year limited warranty and at-home service
    Having experienced all the above software (with the exception of Earthlink application software whatever that is), I'm going to say that yes, it is loaded with crapware. Scariest one on that list would probably be the earthlink application software because that's the most generic name for a product I can ever think of.

    The other differences between these two machines is they have comparable memory, DVD burner & GPU, the Dell's hard drive & CPU are a lot better. The ArsTechnica article mentions upgrades at a price, you could probably get the IMPACT up to the Dell range and get it close which is probably pretty important for the average consumer who doesn't want to deal with the ordeal of reinstalling Windows just to get a clean slate.
    --
    My work here is dung.
  7. Re:Don't sell the students short by The_Fire_Horse · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I know that Walmart are a bunch of pricks, but seriously a 1G PC with 80G HD is more than enough for a students LEARNING needs.
    Sure, if you include MP3's, porn, FPS games and bittorrents it may not run so well, but still $289 isnt a bad price for that.

  8. Re:Don't sell the students short by TheWoozle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Just any junk hardware"? I'll spare you the long list of systems I've worked on, but please allow me to ask you to get off my lawn.

    I've done statistical analysis on a Zenith Data Systems 8088 system and written games for a Commodore 64, so please don't refer to anything with an 80 GB hard drive and 1 GB of RAM as "junk hardware". I know junk hardware, and that, sir, is no TRS-80.

    The fact that the OS needs 1 GB of memory to function is what's wrong with the world! Seesh, kids these days...

    --
    Insisting on "correct" English is like saying that there is only one, definitive recipe for chili.
  9. Minimal crapware.. by tji · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's not totally crapware free. From the Specs: Norton Internet Security(TM) 2007 (90-day subscription included)

    They could have chosen a free AV package, like they chose a free office suite (or even a free operating system). But, they went with the try-now buy-later package.

    1. Re:Minimal crapware.. by l3v1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not totally crapware free. From the Specs: Norton Internet Security(TM) 2007 (90-day subscription included)

      They could have chosen a free AV package, like they chose a free office suite


      Even more, with the Norton stuff installed that 1.5ghz via cpu will feel like a 800mhz one and with constant hdd scratching it will feel like it swaps all the time. There are dozens of - even free - av sw that are at least as good and need much less resources - which is point to consider given there's only 1gb of memory and vista on it. I just made a 750mhz duron machine usable again last week by replacing that norton 2k7 stuff, they just wondered how could that be...
       

      --
      I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
  10. Re:Don't sell the students short by Silver+Sloth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    More likely than anything, I'll just keep building my own. Ok, you can build your own. So can I. However there are many, may people out there who either can't and/or don't want to so supplying an entry level PC at an entry level price is good marketing. There's plenty there to run a browser and OO which will cover most homework assignments. Maybe, when the users find that it won't run the latest games software they'll be forced to upgrade and start the IT learning experience.
    --
    init 11 - for when you need that edge.
  11. Re:Slashdot Groupthink is strange by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Uhm. Not one person on slashdot has said anything positive about wal-mart.

    You are just the kind of dog that likes to pee inside the house I guess.

  12. Nice home Linux server box by tji · · Score: 3, Interesting

    At $300, it's hard to beat.

    The VIA C7 is a nice low-power CPU, with enough kick for most server tasks. At only 20 Watts power, it's well below any of the Intel/AMD options.

    Too bad there isn't a version without the Windows tax.. this box at $250 would be even better.

  13. Re:Don't sell the students short by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wholeheartedly agree!

    Apart from the fact that, if you're going with Windows on this kind of hardware, a version prior to Vista would've been smarter, everything should suffice for it's intended purpose.

    Problem is that Microsoft probably offers OEM's Vista for near free but charges a premium for XP, the system would have probably been more expensive if it included an older version of Windows.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  14. Wow, a 1.5 VIA by edwardpickman · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does it come with a hamster to run the power supply or are those extra?

  15. Inflation of specs for student tasks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What's up with the inflation of specs you need to have to write reports and do other school stuff ? When I was in high school ("Gymnasium" as we call it over here in Europe), I wrote all papers and reports the first year using Amstrad CPC 6128, Arnor Protext on ROM and a 9-pin printer. Later I used a 486 and WP 5.1 (Now with Graphics..). Today I have a 900 MhZ AMD K6, 512 Mb memory, and still I can use InDesign, Word 2003 and Excel to do 100s of pages of technical manuals, without any slowdown at all. Yes, I do not play games, but do you have to ? I would be happy to have a 1,5 GHz with 1G or RAM. So stop saying that it's "Nothing to write home about". My guess is, the people that don't play games never use even a fraction of it's powers.

  16. It's in the processor by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 4, Informative

    I found this on the processor they're using:

    "With a maximum power consumption of just 20 watts (2 watts average), the VIA C7®-D processor sets new standards..."

    How much do 1.5GHz processors normally consume?

    1. Re:It's in the processor by Applekid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      According to this, the Sempron 2500+ runs at 1.4 GHz and had a thermal design profile of 59 W. I assume actual power consumption is greater than the thermal design.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    2. Re:It's in the processor by samwichse · · Score: 4, Informative
      Actually, that is incorrect. AMD calculates their TDP as a worst-case thermal output. From the linked article:

      Thermal Design Power (TDP) is measured under the conditions of TCASE Max, IDD Max, and VDD=VID_VDD, and include all power dissipated on-die from VDD, VDDIO, VLDT, VTT, and VDDA.

      Sam
  17. Re:Slashdot Groupthink is strange by kebes · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I just love the people who treat Slashdot as a single entity with a single opinion... and then proceed to point out hypocrisy in Slashdot because it holds two seemingly incompatible notions.

    Interestingly, they usually describe this as "Groupthink" ... which is basically the notion that everyone starts supports the popular opinion. That is, that everyone agrees with each other to be part of the crowd, and suppress dissenting views. The irony, however, is that the very hypocrisy that is being referred to is telling evidence that groupthink is not as prevalent as it is assumed to be.

    The fact is that Slashdot users have a variety of backgrounds and opinions. On every issue, there is a distribution of opinions. On some subjects we all seem to agree (e.g. "technology is good"), on others we mostly agree (e.g. "Linux is cool") and on others still there is so much disagreement that you will see completely contradictory and opposing opinions both modded up to +5 (e.g. "global warming is a myth").

    Your example, of disliking MS but supporting Wal-Mart, is a total strawman. The general impression I get is that there is a consistent but not universal dislike of Microsoft's business tactics, and that there is solid division of opinion on the Wal-Mart issue. I've seen insightful comments both supporting the good that Wal-Mart does as part of a thriving free market, and insightful comments about the harm that Wal-Mart does as a megacorp that only cares about money. Both sides make good points and the most reasonable stance is probably a nuanced view that takes into account all of these factors. To suggest that Slashdot has a single opinion on these subjects betrays a serious lack of perspective on your part.

    Your closing sentence, "I wish I lived in the fantasy world of most Slashdotters", again is deeply rooted in the fantasy that Slashdot is a single entity with a single mind, and that any self-contradictory statements it makes represent its own insanity, rather than diversity of opinion among its constituents.

  18. Re:One Question by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, and why doesn't everyone cook their own food, since it's cheaper? And why doesn't everyone build their own house, since it's cheaper? And why doesn't everyone buy a used car, since it's cheaper? And why doesn't everyone use fluorescent lighting, since it's cheaper?

    And why does anyone bother trying to whack computer geeks with a clue stick, since it's cheaper not to?

  19. Where to start. by Joce640k · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "email takes substantial amounts of ram and cpu power..."

    The machine has 1Gb RAM. My laptop has a quarter of that and seems to browse the web and run Office perfectly well.

    As for CPU... I'm pretty sure it will cope with the heaviest of messenger sessions.

    I've actually convinced myself that this computer is worse for students than I thought in the first place.

    You need to climb down back to the real world. Very few people need garanteed sub-millisecond response times (or even knows what they are).

    --
    No sig today...
    1. Re:Where to start. by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I got through a good portion of my senior year of college (2002) using an ancient 233 MHz Pentium-MMX laptop. with an UPGRADE to 128M of RAM (from 64).

      This included:
      Word processing
      Web browsing
      IM
      Matlab simulations
      Circuit design with Eagle

      I did have a 1 GHz Athlon Thunderbird available, but with the exception of the Matlab stuff, I took no productivity hit. In fact, if anything my productivity was higher because I could work while laying on my apartment's nice comfy couch instead of sitting at my desk. (This is why I used the laptop when I had another machine available.) In some ways the slowness of the Matlab stuff actuall increased productivity because it forced me/allowed me to multitask while my simulations ran.

      Admittedly, the laptop ran Linux. Running Vista on this machine is likely crippling it so that 1GB RAM might indeed be insufficient.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    2. Re:Where to start. by ricegf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I did my EE senior project (in 1984) on an Atari 800 with 48k of RAM (took 3 cards to hold all those memory chips!) and a floppy disk drive that wrote 88k per disk (unless you used the "hole punch trick", in which case it was a "flippy" and could hold 176k :-).

      For the project, I designed and built a processor from discrete TTL gates (!), and used the Atari to write its operating system as well as a processor simulator to debug it. All this in Atari 8k BASIC.

      And I got an A, too. :-) :-)

      Better yet, as a cooperative education student with NASA, I was actually paid to write a general aviation flight simulator cockpit on the Atari (in raw assembler), and was flown to Oshkosh to present it at the Experimental Aircraft Association convention. I still remember the Apple II and Commodore 64 fans who were determined to argue that their computers were better for flying an airplane than an Atari.

      Crazy kids, we were. But I've never understood every bit in every register in any computer since then.

  20. Re:Don't sell the students short by LWATCDR · · Score: 5, Informative

    Okay let's take a look at the "real world"
    1. It has Vista Home Basic so no Aero. It probably will not be stressing the harware.
    2. It has a gig of Ram. I have NO problem running XP media Center and OpenSuse on a system with a Gig of ram as a duel boot. Open Office runs just fine.
    3. It is under $300.
    4. I has a DVD drive so yes you can watch DVDs on it.
    5. It has IE on it. The sad truth is some sites require IE to work correctly. This is changing but having IE to fall back on does make life easy.
    6. It has Open Office. Which gives you a lot of good tools.
    7. Did I mention it is under $300. Less than a PS/3 or 360?
    8. It only has an 80 gig drive. So it has 6 USB ports. Think Geek was selling 80 Gig external drives for under $50! Those are much better to put your music and videos on anyway. When the RIAA and Montag come knocking at your door they my not find your external drive with your MP3s or your collection of books.
    9. It uses SATA for the HD. I bet you could put in another or a Larger drive if you really wanted it.
    10. So it only has one gig of ram. It has an open memory slot. Go buy an extra gig.

    For a High school kid or even a college student this would be a good machine. Frankly a lot of businesses could work just fine off one of these. It also doesn't use a lot of power thanks to the C7 CPU.

    As to just building your own. Not everyone wants to build their own PC or even knows how. This machine with an LCD monitor would be a handy little system for many people.
    I don't know if it has any open slots but even without them you could add WiFi with USB. You could also add a TV tuner so it could be you kids TV as well.
    In other words it seems like a good deal for some people. The fact that it will not play the latest and greatest games I can only see as a plus.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  21. It's all good by PhotoGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know a lot of people hate Wal-Mart. I personally don't, I guess I haven't watched the right documentaries yet, to tell me what to think, or something.

    And yeah, Wal-Mart probably isn't doing this out of the goodness of their hearts, nor to boost open source, nor to satisfy the few Linux people. Their motivation is undoubtedly to make money, and they usually do that by giving consumers what they want (a cheap item, that does the job).

    Well, we should be proud that OpenOffice is seen as a viable enough too in their delivery of such a product, especially one aimed at students. It really is a big step in the right direction, and validates Open Source to a very large degree.

    -dale

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.