Slashdot Mirror


AC = Domestic Terrorists?

Miang writes "A video from a recent FOX 11 (Los Angeles) newscast has surfaced on YouTube. In the segment, reporter Phil Shuman investigates so-called "Hacker Gangs" comprised entirely of anonymous users. The segment, which focuses mainly on users at 4chan, 7chan, and 420chan, seems to confuse /b/ raids and motivational poster templates with a genuine threat to the American public. For added FUD, the FOX team inserted an unrelated video of a van blowing up — twice! Presumably, one is intended to equate anonymous posting with domestic terror. The story and video can be found on the local FOX website, so it does not appear to be simply a clever parody." Cringe as you watch this video explain terms like 'LULZ' and show inspirational poster parodies as evidence of the evils of this terrifying "Group".

28 of 519 comments (clear)

  1. "so-called 'hacker gangs'" by Aladrin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "so-called 'hacker gangs'"

    They're only called that because you just called them that! Jeeez. There are roving gangs of hackers, lurking the backstreets of the 'net looking for sites to spray their graffiti on.

    --
    "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
  2. Yellow journalism at its finest by Chmcginn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The fact that it's a Fox affiliate isn't relevant, really. I've seen plenty of stories on local ABC, CBS, or NBC stations that were just as cringe-worthy. Even as computers have become more popular, people who really like (and understand) computers haven't.

    --
    Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
    1. Re:Yellow journalism at its finest by goodmanj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The fact that it's a Fox affiliate isn't relevant, really Sure it is. Whether the submitter had a "Fox News Sucks" agenda or not, you need to call institutions out by name when they're acting like morons. ABC, NBC, or Fox, they deserve to have their name in blink tags over this one.
    2. Re:Yellow journalism at its finest by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sounds like somebody couldn't get a date for the prom! Impossible.
      Anonymous always delivers.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:Yellow journalism at its finest by MrNaz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your line of argument doesn't seem to stop everyone else here holding Bill Gates personally responsible for every single Windows flaw.

      --
      I hate printers.
    4. Re:Yellow journalism at its finest by florescent_beige · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I try, I really do, not to fall into the obvious traps but if I did it wouldn't be the first time. My implied premise is that there's a difference between Anonymous and anonymous. Ok that's splitting hairs I know but it's Saturday so I reserve the right to ride off on wild tangents. Anonymous is a proper noun and anonymous is an adjective. *sigh* I even annoy myself sometimes.

      On top of the fact that I'm perched on a darkly obscure distinction is the unfortunate fact that I'm using Fox as a source. That's just asking for it. I know this.

      Can I say that .*chan culture understands the label Anonymous to be part of the the tribe's defining characteristics? Along with quasi-code looking language inventions and obscure acronyms and 133+ speak. It looks to me very much like a classic case of group definition by exclusion. Note the enthusiasm someone demonstrated when they proudly declared that anyone showing up in their territory because of Fox has already been excluded as a "foxfag".

      Also, while I'd be the very very VERY last person to side with Fox on anything there's an old cautionary phrase that fits: A third-rate professional is always better than a first-rate amateur. So while Fox has ulterior motives and their coverage of everything is tinted red, one shouldn't write off the bare facts they used with a wave of the hand. They are professional information gatherers.

      And also .*chan claimed ownership of goatse. That's just plain stupid. Probably evil too.

      --
      Equine Mammals Are Considerably Smaller
  3. Hackers On Steroids by LackThereof · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Apparently, the ability to phish myspace passwords from clueless users earns you the title of "Hackers on Steroids" now. OMGWTFHAX!

    --
    Legalize recreational marijuana. Seriously.
  4. They did bring us HP7... by rdwald · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, 4chan did let us all read Harry Potter 7 five days early...and the video does equate spoiling popular fantasy books with domestic terrorism...so I guess they are terrorists!

  5. Re:I actually have sympathy.... by skrolle2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If there's anything else the victims have in common is that they take themselves way too seriously.

    The internet is a wonderful place, everyone can get their 15 minutes of fame, and more. However, it might not be the fame they want, and trying to control it is absolutely futile. Maybe posting some sob story on your livejournal that everyone on the internet can read isn't such a good idea, maybe posting too much skin on your myspace is a bad idea too. It's as if people forget why it's a good idea to protect your privacy when they go on the internet, and some of these people get burnt by it. I hope they learn something at least.

  6. Re:I actually have sympathy.... by Chmcginn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    actually have some sympathy for the reporters involved in this, because they have no clue what they're getting themselves in to.
    If reporters don't take the time to properly educate themselves on something before reporting on it, they're not doing their job, plain and simple. I don't have any sympathy for them - mainly because plenty of grandma & grandpa types who've never even heard of 4chan before that report now think their house will get firebombed if they post to the wrong message board.
    --
    Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
  7. Re:I actually have sympathy.... by oohshiny · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Anonymous is what happens when you give people the ability to act without reprecussions,

    And "reporter" is what happens when you have sunk so low that it doesn't matter anymore what you say as long as it's controversial.

    No matter how anonymity may be abused, it's an essential part of a functioning democracy and free society, because if you don't have it, the only people participating in discussions are those with nothing to lose.

  8. You got a bunch of people by iminplaya · · Score: 5, Insightful

    right here on Slashdot who feel the same way. "I ignore ACs" "I don't respond to ACs" "I mod ACs to -6". I think it's sick. Those people are closed minded so-n-sos. Well, all you ACs out there, I DO respond if the comment is worth responding to. I don't care where it comes from. I derive value from the comment itself, not necessarily the author. Don't let anybody shut you down. Use whatever abilities you have to be heard.

    --
    What?
    1. Re:You got a bunch of people by joto · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We are all more or less anonymous here on slashdot. Very few people know who hides behind a username. The problem with ACs isn't their anonymity, it's their lack of identity. It's the same thing people are discussing about certain muslim women covering their face. Not only are they anonymous (most everyone in a big city is, even if they tell you their name (which could be fake)), but they also lack an identity. If you met her later, you wouldn't be able to tell if it was the same woman, or somebody else. This makes people feel uneasy about talking to such a person, even if she is a nice religious woman, and not a bank-robber (although bank-robbers have been known to use burkas as well).

      It is no doubt that anonymity, and certainly, lack of identity, leads to antisocial behaviour. If people are to be held responsible for their actions, they need to be recognized by the people around them. That's why every discussion group on the Internet is full of people behaving antisocially, from flamers to trolls to crackpots, most of those people would have shut their mouth if it wasn't for the fact that they are anonymous. People who also choose to lack an identity (such as AC) are usually even worse, and seldom worth listening to.

      There is nothing wrong about being scared of anonymity. What is funny about the Fox 11 coverage isn't that they claim anonymous Internet users can behave badly. What is funny is that they compare this to actual real-world terrorism, which, to take it mildly, is quite a different matter.

    2. Re:You got a bunch of people by iminplaya · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, this is FOX we're talking about here. It's all about ratings. And FUD, like lesbians = ratings. Personally, I'd rather see more lesbians.

      --
      What?
    3. Re:You got a bunch of people by AusIV · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I generally ignore ACs, because often the ACs are complete trolls. If they happen to get modded up into the range of posts that are viewable to me, I read them and sometimes respond.


      But ACs aren't the extent of anonymity on Slashdot. You go by the nickname iminplaya. I assume that's not your real name. All I know about you is that you have 6,309 posts on slashdot, I can easily find the last 24 if I'd like, and somehow after 6,309 posts you've managed to avoid getting a karma bonus.

      The same is pretty much true with me. Even though I seem to be the only 'AusIV' on the web, I still have a great deal of anonymity. Someone who knows me might be able to track what I say (and I keep that in mind), but I still have the wiggle room to say what I want on the web without being concerned it's going to piss them off and they're going to hunt me down in real life.

  9. simply wow by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wow. That's all I can say about that piece. Just wow...

    First off, wasn't the Harry Potter spoiler clip in the middle of there taken from the Daily Show? (I could swear that's John Oliver's voice).

    Second, the tool with the MySpace account--it's clear to anyone that has any idea about anything that he simply ended up with a virus/keylogger installed. "Anonymous" got his passwords from that and the virus got spread to his friends. Woooooh, that kinda shits been happening on the internet for forever now. He simply appears even more foolish for not having even that much of a clue (hell, my grandparents are aware that there are viruses and nasties out there).

    What I find most disturbing about this is that if anyone sends Fox 11 an email/letter/phone call/whatever explaining to them how far off base their piece is, they'll just treat it all as threats that further back up their claim. Truly truly sad....

    --
    This guy's the limit!
  10. HA! by iminplaya · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As long as they get this kind of press, they'll never get bored. The FOX story is a great recruitment piece.

    --
    What?
    1. Re:HA! by florescent_beige · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...The FOX story is a great recruitment piece.
      Quite. And if it occupies the kids who have nothing to do because their divorced moms and dads are too busy working to pay for their BIG STUPID PICKUP TRUCKS then I'm all for it. Keeps them off my lawn.
      --
      Equine Mammals Are Considerably Smaller
  11. Re:/b/ raids? by skrolle2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think u need to lurk moar.

  12. Fox 11 Trolled by nitehawk214 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I dont know who that "Former Anonymous" they had on there was. But he is now the greatest Troll in internet history.

    Congratulations, sir. You have my undying admiration for having the balls to do a RL troll the likes of which I have never seen before.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  13. What's wrong with people. by iamdrscience · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How is it that after all these years, there are still people who don't realize that nothing that happens on the internet is real? That hot chick you've been chatting with? There's a 95% chance she is a dude and a 5% chance that she is fat, ugly and crazy. That dude who told you he would slit your whole family's throats and shit down their esophaguses because you like original Star Trek better than the Next Generation? He's 12 years old. Porn sites that say their girls are having sex for the first time? They're lying. That e-mail you got from a guy in Nigeria who wants to give you money? You're not going to get it.

    ad infinitum.

    1. Re:What's wrong with people. by Lord+Ender · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That hot chick you've been chatting with? There's a 95% chance she is a dude and a 5% chance that she is fat, ugly and crazy
      That may have been true ten years ago. Today, myspace, facebook, and other "social" sites are more popular with women than men. Yes, you really can meet real women online. Just make sure they aren't Chris Hansen before you meet them :-)
      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  14. Conservative Fear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As we've had to see for the past seven+ years, there is absolutely NOTHING which conservatives don't live in terror of.

    It's little wonder groups like Al Qaeda are outmaneuvering Bush and the other conservatives: the Bushites are so fearful, they only know what they can see from their "undisclosed location". Conservative = coward.

    Cowardservatives!

    1. Re:Conservative Fear by dgbrownnt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's really a shame.

      First off, you have a news station who adds a bit too much drama to their report, making it bigger than it should be. In turn, when this hits the web, it becomes a lambasting of the people who were victimized here.

      Yes, these aren't 'hackers on steroids' or anything. The report is just talking about groups of malicious internet users -- I'm sure many of them have no skills and are at best script kiddies. The point is that there are people running around harassing people. Your typical slashdotter may feel the need to make fun of the mom that found a need to get a security system and a dog, but that's EXACTLY the kind of reaction most of our parents would have if confronted with calls of death threats, posting of family members pictures and addresses online, and notices for people to do bad stuff to them.

      What you have are groups of people who do have fun being assholes to the rest of the internet. Terrorists, no. But it is a problem, none-the-less. So go ahead and laugh at the people that these assholes victimize. I, for one, don't think it's funny.

  15. Re:I actually have sympathy.... by jmccay · · Score: 1, Insightful

    That still doesn't excuse the hackers. Whether it's just for fun or not, they still may be breaking the law (IANAL). The lack of any clue by the reporters and research teams doesn't change the actions of the hackers. What they did in the two cases mentioned was a form of cyber bullying. What was their reasoning for doing this to these people, "I don't like that you are doing {fill in the here}! So I going to hack your site an ruin you", or whatever their reasoning. Whether, or not, the victims are stupid, or just clueless, is irrelevant, they still are victims. AC can be abused just as much as it is useful. There is something to having the guts to say you disagree with someone and have a polite discourse with them about it. Just because you don't agree with someone, doesn't mean it's right to go an trash their website. That's just childish, and possibly criminal (IANAL).

          In the end, I think AC is abused more than it is helpful. As another poster pointed out, people tend to do more extreme things when they can be an AC. Take that away, and they act nice and respectable. It's like the a school kid who is nice to you when your there, but mean, disrespectful, vindictive, and goes out of their way to cause trouble for you when you're not around.

    --
    At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
  16. Privacy = Terrorism by PMBjornerud · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As we've had to see for the past seven+ years, there is absolutely NOTHING which conservatives don't live in terror of. I'm more worried about the connecting "anonymity" with "terrorism". Anonymity causes people to be jerks, but it's also great for free speech.

    Cue suggestions to track people by name and number online, to prevent this kind of terrorism. The police state and crackdown on piracy fits lovingly well together.

    Yes, that's a bit on the paranoid side. I'm bored.
    --
    I lost my sig.
  17. Re:overrated-MOD TO OBLIVION by toQDuj · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, no. You have it wrong there.

    Anonymity is a prime ingredient for a functioning democracy. Take camera surveillance. People are going to be scared to do anything out of the ordinary, for fear of being flagged as a peculiar guy (and thus much more likely to be caught doing anything illegal, even the mundane stuff like throwing something on the ground instead of in the trashcan). This fear prevents anyone from questioning the status quo, and thus a "democracy" results in everyone agreeing with the current government.

    B.

    --
    Every experiment which ends in a big bang is a good experiment.
  18. SAGE by rjamestaylor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE If your don't get it, you weren't meant to. SAGE.

    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello