Spore to Ship 'When It's Done' And Not Before

Citing the sheer potential of the title, EA executives John Riccitiello and Frank Gibeau stated in a conference call yesterday that Spore will not ship until it is finished. Next Generation reports: "'It's one of those breakthrough products that might come across the industry every three, five, seven years ... We could not be more bullish for the potential of the franchise as we are right now,' said Riccitiello. He said that he still expects the game to ship in the 'March, April, May' 2008 timeframe. However, Riccitiello said, 'We will make the choice of shipping a better game than an on-time game given the high potential for this franchise.'"

Comments

Translation:

[spun]

"Spore will ship when it is actually fun to play, instead of feeling like a session of tweaking a very complicated spreadsheet."

Re:Translation:

[the dark hero]

"Spore will ship when it is actually fun to play, instead of feeling like a session of tweaking a very complicated spreadsheet." Then, why is Eve Online successful?

Coming soon

[Nf1nk]

Coming soon the Duke Nukem forever and Spore Double Pack

Balancing act

[PieSquared]

Well, the delays for Spore are starting to get frustrating. On the other hand, after all these delays it better be a pretty freaking good game... which it won't be if they rush it to put an end to the delays.

Obviously no game is ever perfect, so it is up to the developers to decide the proper balance between time spent improving the game and delays before release.

That said, nobody wants another "Duke Nukem Forever." If you spend too much time on the whole "revolutionizing videogames" someone will take the lessons presented at all these talks Wright does and actually *finish* a game that heavily utilizes procedural generation or whatever before Spore comes out, and it won't be revolutionary anymore.

Re:Balancing act

[acvh]

nobody wants another "Duke Nukem Forever."

hell, I must have missed the first one. how was it?

Here are a few

[Moraelin]

I wonder where I've heard this here "We'll ship it when it's finished" rhetoric before?

For example, from Epic, Blizzard, and a few others who are now the big names of the industry for it. It turns out that, surprise, more people buy a game which is finished and polished than something shoved out the door to meet an arbitrary deadline. Much as a couple of publishers still hope that if they believe the opposite really, really hard, it will somehow become reality.

CTRL+F

[rbarreira]

First thing I did after clicking "Read more..." was CTRL+F, "duke". I knew there would be results!

Re:Hypocrisy

[shish]

Everyone is always... Protip: the vast majority of generalisations are horribly flawed.

the SAME people are bitching Can you provide a list of usernames? I would think it far more likely that person A is bitching about one thing, and person B is bitching about another -- just because persons A and B visit the same website does not make them hypocrites for saying different things...

Franchise?

[The Orange Mage]

That's right. It's in the article. They refer to Spore as a franchise.

So what, Spore 2010, with updated rosters and some tiny new feature? Repeat formula next year?

From The Man himself:

[El_Smack]

A delayed game is eventually good, a bad game is bad forever. - Shigeru Miyamoto