Slashdot Mirror


Astronomer Offers Theory Into 400-Year-Old Lunar Mystery

webdoodle writes "An astronomer at Columbia University thinks he has solved a 400-year-old mystery: the origin of strange optical flashes seen on the moon's surface. These spots, called 'Transient Lunar Phenomenon' (TLP) by the astronomy community, have confused moon-gazers since the time of ancient scientists. Arlin Crotts now thinks that TLPs are something called 'outgassing', a process where trapped gasses escape to the lunar atmosphere. 'To arrive at his theory, Crotts correlated TLPs with known gas outbursts from the lunar surface as seen by several spacecraft, particularly NASA's Apollo 15 mission in 1971 and the robotic Lunar Prospector in 1998. What he discovered was a remarkable similarity in the pattern of outgassing event locations recorded by spacecraft across the face of the moon and reported TLP sites.'"

18 of 66 comments (clear)

  1. I'm more curious ... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Funny

    if that pepperoni pizza I just consumed can cause outgassing events. My girlfriend says so, but I believe she is mistaken.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    1. Re:I'm more curious ... by Null+Nihils · · Score: 5, Funny

      My ROOMMATE says so, but I believe HE is mistaken.

      Fixed that for you.
    2. Re:I'm more curious ... by datapharmer · · Score: 5, Funny

      My PARENTS says so, but THEY ARE mistaken.

      Fixed that for you.

      --
      Get a web developer
    3. Re:I'm more curious ... by vigmeister · · Score: 5, Funny

      My PARENTS says so, but THEY ARE upstairs on the ground floor. Cheers!
      --
      Vig

      --
      Atheist: Buddhist in a Prius
    4. Re:I'm more curious ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Plural subject gets a plural verb! Goddamn Neanderthals...

  2. That's Obscene! by BlackGriffen · · Score: 2, Funny

    The man in the moon is not only farting in our general direction, he's flashing us at the same time, too!

  3. Why do you overlook the obvious answer? by jollyreaper · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's an alien space traveler. He crashed on the moon, lost just about everything, no subspace radio, no towel, all he's got is a shiny bit of the craft he's been using as a signal mirror for the past 400 years and we're too damn busy to answer him back! Better hope this doesn't get back to the Guide, our description might be revised to "mostly oblivious."

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    1. Re:Why do you overlook the obvious answer? by tehshen · · Score: 2, Funny

      I guess Itchy had the right idea...

      --
      Guy asked me for a quarter for a cup of coffee. So I bit him.
  4. Re:Uh, "New"? by HaloMan · · Score: 3, Funny

    >Can Slashdot editors fire-up Google before they post old theories as new ones?

    You're new here, aren't you?

  5. Radon? by calidoscope · · Score: 3, Informative

    Problem with blaming the outgassing on Radon is that the half life is only a couple of days. OTOH, all the helium emitted as alpha particles as part of the decay chain doesn't decay and may make up a good portion of the gas.

    --
    A Shadeless room is a brighter room.
    1. Re:Radon? by Mothinator · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, but radon is a decay product of uranium, which is much longer lived. I don't know if there is a lot of uranium on the moon, but I know the earth produces a lot of radon.

      It tends to collect in basements and give people cancer.

    2. Re:Radon? by vigmeister · · Score: 2, Funny

      ATI produces a lot of radeon.
      It tends to collect in parents' basements There. Fixed that for you :)

      Cheers!
      --
      Atheist: Buddhist in a Prius
  6. Step 2 by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now astronomers are looking for the Burrito Cluster Nebula predicted by these events.

  7. Tags by Umbral+Blot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Currently this article is tagged "things" (or at least it was when I viewed it). That may be the tag that conveys the least possible amount of information. Sorry to be off-topic, but the absurdity of the tag seems to be saying something either about the tagging system or the people who use it. (Of course I wouldn't say that the tag "science" on an article in the science section is much more useful.)

    1. Re:Tags by WalterGR · · Score: 4, Informative

      ...this article is tagged "things" (or at least it was when I viewed it). That may be the tag that conveys the least possible amount of information.

      That's because the summary contains a typo that reads "things." Certainly the "typo" tag would be more informative, but whatever. Welcome to folksonomies. Emphasis mine:

      Arlin Crotts now things that TLPs are something called 'outgassing'...
  8. Vid of meteor hitting moon. by zymano · · Score: 2, Informative
  9. Re:Tags - things and stuff. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 5, Funny
    Currently this article is tagged "things"...

    The word "stuff" was thought to be too specific.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  10. Re:Where is Jesus in all this? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, when my girlfriend was observing our own localized outgassing phenomenon she did say something along the lines of "Jesus Christ! You didn't have to destroy the atmosphere!" I took that that to mean that I am Jesus Christ (much to my surprise) and I suppose it's possible that the Moon once did have an atmosphere and that I accidentally blew it away. But it's been a long time and I don't remember for sure.

    Probably means I should lay off the pizza though.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.