Slashdot Mirror


Indiana University Dumps Google for ChaCha

theodp writes "Come Monday, no more Indiana University searches will be powered by computer-driven Google. Only by people-powered ChaCha. The move was announced by new IU President Michael McRobbie, who until recently sat on ChaCha's Board of Directors (5-29 SEC filing, PDF). IU will draft hundreds of librarians and IT employees to be ChaCha Guides for the university's websites, although a FAQ accompanying IU's press release tells librarians not to expect any checks for their efforts from ChaCha, which IU notes is backed by Amazon's Jeff Bezos and Compaq founder Rod Canion."

6 of 211 comments (clear)

  1. Obligatory thedailywtf link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It appears ChaCha is Very Quality

    It reminds me of one of failed DotBomb era projects.

  2. sponsored links by timmarhy · · Score: 5, Interesting
    chacha mixes sponsored links, see ADVERTISMENTS, in with valid matches. they can fuck off and die.

    anyone else notice that the format is exactly like googles?

    --
    If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
  3. I was a ChaCha guide... by sykopomp · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Only thing ChaCha is really useful over Google is for the 'epic lulz'. Messing with ChaCha guides is amazing, and I bet the university will stop using ChaCha guided searches when a bunch of students start asking for pictures of lemonparty. Hint: they couldn't actually ban someone from the service last I checked. ;)

  4. How does it differ from downloading term papers? by mosel-saar-ruwer · · Score: 4, Interesting


    Seriously though, who knows? Maybe enough people suck at searching to make this service worthwhile

    Given that much of modern intellectual life has degenerated into seeing who can come up with the best Google searches [or PubMed searches, or arXiv searches, or whatever], how does hiring someone to do your searching for you differ from hiring someone to write your term papers for you?

  5. Re:I can't blame them... by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As speaking from Columbus next door, IUPUC has its head stuck up their asses when it comes to IU mandate.

    Back in 2001, we had 350 MHz machines with 128 and 256 MB. They mandated us with a switch from NT4 (which worked great and kept games and crap off) to 2000. Slow-city. A year and a half later, we were mandated for XP. For the same FARKING machines.

    They also had serious problems with Windows Messenger spam coming from within the IU network. Of course, the drop-dead easy solution of turning off Windows Messenger service was too above their comprehension to do.

    Next, the uni uses ADS and Kerberos for auth. IUPUC auths with ads.iupui.edu over a T-1. Guess what happens when you flood the T-1? Nobody logs in. I tried to tell them, but they learned the hard way when a bunch of techies from the IU side kazaa-ed the T-1 down. Heads rolled, and they finally took my suggestion: dont disable local guest or admin. Just password them heavily in that authorized people could still use the doorstops... computers.

    Pretty much, you end up with "If you cant do, teach. If you cant teach, work in IT."

    Coming from a CompSci dropout. Chem is better by far.

    And a side note: No wonder they fired the old IU president. Guess the old one wouldnt take kickbacks.

    --
  6. Re:Big news ? by pthor1231 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Because no one leaves the Board of a Directors of a company that they think is going to be successful and does a HUGE favor like this, and receives nothing in the end. Since they are not a publicly traded company, their financials don't have to be disclosed either, so no one has any way of verifying this without some sort of official investigation. Even without direct proof, it is still a huge conflict of interest in mine, and many other people's opinions.