Slashdot Mirror


Bank Run in Second Life

Jamie found an interesting bit about a bank run in Second Life. The recent ban on gambling combined with a $12k theft from the 2L stock market has caused people to try to get their money back. The article mentions that this could supposedly affect 8.5M players even tho most estimates of actual hard core players in the system are in the 5 to low 6 figure range.

19 of 336 comments (clear)

  1. Vast exaggeration by DaleGlass · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ginko is a resident run bank, which has nothing really special about it. You can it on their own a href="https://ginkofinancial.com/">website: They only claim to have 18,875 accounts, quite a few of which probably were created as a test. Nowhere near the 8.5 million claimed.

    Ginko's problem was their insane interest rates, which IIRC varied somewhere between 100% and 30% per year. I think it was 70% for a quite long time. People accused it of being a Ponzi scheme, which given that enormous interest sounds likely. That's why I never put a cent in it :-)

    1. Re:Vast exaggeration by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Okay, I think I have some expertise on this, because I actually ran an SL "bank" (under a broad definition of "bank", but I called it a bank). I can tell you that 100% interest rate in SL is NOT "insane", and I can tell you how to "earn" that kind of interest without a Ponzi scheme.

      First, some background: (as of '03 when I played) in SL, they make it so that they "recharge" your money to a certain level each week, sort of like welfare. The day of the week varies between people. So, if you store your money with a trusted party, it will look like you're poor and you'll get money despite not being poor. I believe at the time it was something like LD 7000 that they would recharge you to. My bank served the function of the trusted party: I'd hold their money (through a script) over their recharge day.

      Oh, and yes, I was very open about this, and told admins I was doing it. They didn't care.

      Now, this doesn't explain how exactly you'd employ someone's money to make more money (like the banks claimed). However, it shows how, using some tricks, you can start with e.g. LD 7000, and "earn" 7000 more each week ... that's definitely more than a 100% yearly effective interest rate!

    2. Re:Vast exaggeration by DaleGlass · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, let's look at the stats, then.

      There are 18,875 accounts. Right now there are 34,822 people logged in (see http://secondlife.com/ ). In the last 60 days, 1,646,830 people logged in. So the total Ginko userbase is not all that great compared to the amount of people who use SL.

      Next, it's quite reasonable to assume that a good portion of those 18,875 are by people who put there L$1 (USD $.00370) as a test, then forgot about it.

      Now, they say their deposits are L$94,441,798 = USD $349,784. But, Ginko's claims about the amount of deposits were cast into doubt by several people, and that number seems to include interest, that is money they would be expected to give, but which none of the users actually put there.

      Average amount of money per account is $349,784 / 18,875 = $18.53

      Looking at the SL statistics:
      US$ Spent Last 24h: $1,433,039
      LindeX Activity Last 24h: $223,005

      You can see that even the claimed amount of money isn't all that huge, and after years of operation at the enormous interest they claimed, most of that cash must be accumulated interest anyway.

      While I bet some people will lose something quite significant, I don't think it's nearly as big as the article says.

    3. Re:Vast exaggeration by Control+Group · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Um. Nope. The US dollar is worth something because it has a limited supply.

      Only if the something in question has some objective value. I can print off a few hundred CGMUs (Control Group Monetary Units), making a very limited supply, but I don't imagine that would make them worth money to anyone else*.

      Unlike the other commodities you mention, US dollars have no inherent utility. The "full faith and credit" of the US government determines their utility. Their scarcity determines their market value. You need both for a given good to be worth something.

      *If I'm wrong about this, I invite you to invest in my CGMU-printing business.
      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    4. Re:Vast exaggeration by Control+Group · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The GP was right for the question he was answering: why do the unbacked, limited-supply US dollars have value? Among other things, because you can pay taxes with them. I would add further, that so many debts are denominated in US dollars. This cascades into a sort of network effect: X people accept dollars, because they can pay debts with them, so MOST people accept dollars because they will be buying from someone, somehow connected to those X people.

      All of which boils down to the starting point, the the US government mandates that debts within the US can be settled by exchange of US dollars. This causes the cascade which you - accurately - describe. Which is why the worldwide value of the dollar is so closely related to the strength/productivity of the US economy, since that determines exactly what debts are mandatorily satisfiable with US dollars.

      An interesting question to ponder is what might happen if the US government removed the legal requirement of accepting US currency to settle US debts, even if the government itself continued to accept it and pay its debts with it. On the one hand, the dollar is so well-established as a currency that it's tempting to suspect that it would go right on, much as it currently does. On the other, there would have to be a follow-on effect to such a vote of no confidence from the government which theoretically backs the value of the currency.

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    5. Re:Vast exaggeration by sfjoe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's the whole reason US money is worth something, because the government guarantees they will accept it in payment of taxes.

      Well, that's *A* reason but not "the whole reason". The US dollar is unique amongst currencies as it is close to being a global currency. It is accepted in nearly every country and some countries even use it as their own official currency rather than print their own. People accept it as having value because the know it will retain value in the future making it the world's foremost reserve currency.

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
    6. Re:Vast exaggeration by Control+Group · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Control Group is a monkey brain!

      Good start.

      Legal tender is NOTHING to do with transactions per se. I can demand that I am paid in anything. Quite often US transactions are conducted in Pounds Sterling, or Euros, particularly if there is some forex issue in the bargain.

      If you specify a different medium of exchange beforehand, yes. As I admitted in another post, I was being overly simplistic. You may not retroactively elect to not accept dollars as payment.

      Now, debts here are usually valued in dollars. If I owe you $100, I might offer you a gold bracelet worth more, and you would be within your rights to refuse. I might offer you my daughter. You might accept. But if I offered you 100 greenbacks, you would not be within your rights to refuse. They are Legal Tender, and must be accepted.

      What kind of distinction between "debt" and "debt" are you trying to draw? If you owe me $100 because I served you dinner at a restaurant, I may not suddenly demand payment in the form of your daughter's services. This is not in any real sense different than if you owe me $100 because I loaned you $75 at 33% interest. Either way, you owe me $100; what transaction incurred that debt is irrelevant - all that matters is that we did not agree beforehand on a different method of payment.

      And the idea that money is valuable because the government says it is ... Blockhead!!!

      At the moment the Zimbabwean government is saying that the Zimbabwean dollar is worth 1/250 of a US dollar. Try getting that!

      Value is what it's always been - a feature of a comodity which has utility and is scarce.

      What an interesting point you've made. Where, exactly, do you suppose the "utility" of the dollar comes from? Its caloric value? Its insulating properties? Its ideal shape for snorting coke? Oh, right, it has utility because the US government says it does.

      And since you need utility and scarcity for a commodity to have value - as you so soberly indicate - the dollar has value because the US government says it does. The fact that you have conflated "has value" with "has a specific market value" in your head does not mean that's what I said or what I meant. The US government can't dictate a market value for the dollar any more than Zimbabwe can. It does not follow that, therefore, the value of the dollar is not based on the US government.

      Oh, and - you're a stupid poopyhead garbageface.
      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
  2. What Do You Expect by mfh · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Video Games are designed to be fun and typically fantasy based. People will give away money to the makers of video games for hours of enjoyment.

    The reality is that anyone who lost money on this is getting what they paid for.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
  3. Re:Looking for a decent exchange rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    SL is full of people ripping each other off or ripping real world works off..
    SL can either be fun or dangerous depending on what you take it to be.

    Example Someone ripping off investors is no different than Suzanna Soyinka (a resident who runs a sim) selling Copyright works of White wolfs Clan Symbols. Except that the IRL companies do not know about it. Tons of residents sell (C) works and get away with it. But no one stops it.

    In game these people actually know about it but they were foolish to invest. They even have their own stock marker where in game companies can IPO. BUt no one really regulates it.. Its a new frontier. Eventually once it becomes web3.0 which i predict SL will be... It will end up being regulated.

  4. Re:People are idiots by Silver+Sloth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You might as well call playing the slots in Vegas a retirement plan, it's probably less risky. Definitely less risky. In Vegas you know exactly what the odds are, they may be against you, but they're known. I would say that a better analogy is investing in rich Nigerians who want to get their funds to the west.
    --
    init 11 - for when you need that edge.
  5. Is anyone really surprised by this? by blueZ3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The whole concept of virtual money that is traded in a virtual environment was a "bank-run" waiting to happen.

    Linden-dollars (or whatever they're called) are backed by the full faith and credit of Linden Labs. Which is a lot less comforting to the average person than being backed by the U.S. government. Once Linden starts to lose credibility (and how was money "stolen" from the stock market) all those Lindenbacks are going to be worth the bits they're printed on.

    I'm shocked, absolutely shocked to find gambling going on here.

    --
    Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
  6. Saw this coming... by ZorinLynx · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I knew this was coming.

    In the past couple of weeks I heard of at least three people who had trouble getting money out of Ginko.

    Word gets around quickly in these cases; as soon as people found out Ginko isn't paying out withdrawls they lose confidence and want their money back, just as would happen with a real bank.

    Thankfully I have no money in Ginko. No way in hell I was ever going to trust them.

  7. Re:Fiat currencies have several problems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The value of first-world fiat currency has been far more stable than the value of gold. A gold-standard economy can collapse for no meaningful reason simply because the supply of gold is restricted. Those "thousand years" you mention were filled with wars over a useless metal!

  8. Re:Another scam? by AVee · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "The article is lighter on details than it should be for an article that spans two pages, but it looks to me like someone set up yet another "bank", promising high returns (and actually delivering for awhile), that was actually just a pyramid scheme. Once the pyramid gets big enough the creator always grabs the money and runs, and people cry and write articles about it."

    Al very true, but in the end it might just be the game which is a pyramid scheme, not just the bank inside the game. If Lindon were to pull the plug out of the game right now, where would you go to exchange your Lindon Dollars for real ones?

  9. Some perspective by amyhughes · · Score: 3, Interesting

    These "banks" and other "economic institutions" are given more legitimacy than they deserve, and their impact is grossly over-stated.

    Before casinos were banned the daily SL economy was about US $2 Million per day. That's the total amount of all transactions between residents that Linded Labs (who run Second Life) knows about. It's currently running about US $1.4 Million. That's a big hit, but the difference was people putting money into slot machines. The banning has hurt some people running unregulated gambling scripts, and benefitted the idiots that were feeding them. A wash, AFAIC.

    The Ginko thing also only affects a scammer and his victims, and is only US $0.75 Million. Less than a day's economic activity. Those people payed into a ponzi scheme, and like the gamblers, they had no reason to expect a return. Some might say that whatever the "banker" invested in will suffer, but until proven otherwise, his "investments" are probably real-world. That money is already gone from the economy, and it's not an economy-crashing amount even if some of it actually is invested in SL.

    The real danger is to the land barons, who continue to buy up all the virtual land The Labs has to offer; much of it up for sale as casinos also sell off their land. Them, and Linden Lab itself, who stand to lose tier payments on land people can't afford to hold. But if a hypothetical sell-off is short-lived and is absorbed by new members and other residents suddenly able to buy cheap land, LL stands to gain as they get to re-sell land that is abandoned; land they already sold once and will get to sell again. The most likely scenario is that land re-sale prices (prices residents pay each other, not The Labs) will go down some, and The Labs will be unaffected. It is probable, in fact, that they want land prices to go down so people will buy more of it. They make much more money on monthly land payments than they do selling land (i.e. server space) to land barons.

  10. Re:Fiat currencies have several problems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    You say:

    Wealth is never "created" it is only transfered. If you let one person "create" new money (by any means), then they stole wealth from everyone else who is holding that kind of money.
    I'm trying hard to figure out what the fuck you think "wealth" could mean. Do you think wealth is a stock of money? Doesn't wealth mean value though, so isn't your sentence like saying "value is never 'created' it is only transfered". You could say the same about work -- work is never "created" it is only transferred. If you do the work at night, it is "transfered" from the sandman to you... When a Doctor extends a life, more days aren't "created" in the life of that person, but only "transferred" from the afterlife? When a new algorithm is developed, it's not "created" but only "transferred" from the "List of Possible Algorithms" to the "List of Algorithms In Use"? WTF is your thinking????
  11. Re:Looking for a decent exchange rate by RubberDogBone · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The fundamental flaw with gold is that it's only actually valuable because people desire it and it's relatively rare at the same time.

    Flaw? Gold is not THAT rare. Major countries sit on huge stockpiles of gold and literal gold mines. If they so chose, they could release massive quantities of gold into the market which would instantly deflate the value of everybody's holdings and crash the economy of any country stuck on the gold standard.

    Russia, for example, could dump some of their holdings. This would possibly halve the price of gold, instantly. What, then, would that do to the US economy if it was tied to gold? Chaos. Imagine waking up to find that your investment has lost half its value and you can't even sell it.

    Even now, private investors see gold as the miracle investment but it still suffers from the same weakness. A Russia or China or someone else could instantly make that miracle investment into miracle whip.

    You don't want to give other countries that kind of power to destroy your financial structure. You don't want to be tied to something you cannot control or worse is controlled by people who oppose you and won't hesitate to undermine what you want.

    --
    Sig for hire.
  12. Re:You don't think debt is a commodity? by zobier · · Score: 2, Interesting

    think about how you'd value the following if modern civilization were to collapse - potable water, food, matches, ammunition, tobacco, liquor, coffee, paper, gold. Sounds great, where do I sign up.
    --
    Me lost me cookie at the disco.
  13. Re:Fiat currencies have several problems. by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually, those with money would leave the country and live well because their cash just became worth a whole lot more. Those without would starve.

    If those with money left this country in the dead of night, those without could simply raid the storehouses of food left behind. OR, better yet, actually take over the farms stolen by the white man to begin with.

    People certainly do need to eat, but there would be no investment. Most likely what you would see would be alternate fiat currency like we saw during the great depression.

    Fine with me. Alternate fiat currency takes control out of the hands of the central bankers and returns it to where it belongs, the local villages.

    It would mean that we'd be in the same position as Germany pre-WW2. Either we keep paying or we default on our loans. Defaulting on our loans would cause a world-wide economic disaster, so the most likely course of action for other countries that thought we were going to do so would be to threaten to invade if we tried it.

    We're going to default on our loans anyway, eventually, so why not do it in one fell swoop? It's not like anybody believes the lie that wealth is created out of nothing, and that's what we have left in the United States at this point, a service economy, a whole lot of nothin'.

    It is sensible precisely because it works and doesn't cause us to ruin billions of lives by sending the entire world into a depression.

    And it's completely unsustainable and will eventually collapse, ruining billions of lives and sending the entire world into a depression anyway. Once again, all this does is hasten the inevitable.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.