Slashdot Mirror


China Sets Sights on Comprehensive Lunar Survey

eldavojohn writes "Perhaps unsatisfied with the closeups that Google Moon has to offer, China has decided to survey the moon down to the 'inch'. In the second half of 2007, they plan to launch an unmanned lunar satellite to first orbit the moon, land on the moon & then return samples to earth for them to analyze. '"The moon probe project is the third milestone in China's space technology after satellite and manned spacecraft projects, and a first step for us in exploring deep space," the China National Space Administration head said. The orbiter represented the first phase, with a moon rover to be used in the second phase scheduled for around 2012, reports said. The plan for the third phase, scheduled for around 2017, was for another rover to land on the lunar surface and collect samples before returning to Earth.'"

122 comments

  1. Conspiracy Theorists... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think they'll survey any moon landers?

    1. Re:Conspiracy Theorists... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And why not?, litle genius.

    2. Re:Conspiracy Theorists... by Bandman · · Score: 1

      First thing I thought of too.

    3. Re:Conspiracy Theorists... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think they'll survey any moon landers?
      Doubtful. Warner Brothers has long since dismantled that set.

      My hope this time is that China records it in HD-DVD format, since bluray will most likely give us the same quality as in 69.
    4. Re:Conspiracy Theorists... by trolltalk.com · · Score: 1

      Why not - and turn them into tourist traps?

      If you're into conspiracies, the real reason they're surveying the moon is that they need the space.

    5. Re:Conspiracy Theorists... by loshwomp · · Score: 1

      Why not - and turn them into tourist traps?

      With hookers! And blackjack! In fact, forget the tourist traps!

    6. Re:Conspiracy Theorists... by burndive · · Score: 1
      --
      ...because "hacker" sounds way sexier than "code drone."
    7. Re:Conspiracy Theorists... by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      No, but they might just clone them.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  2. mars by Bombula · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone want to start laying bets on who lands a person on Mars first? It's looking more and more like the Chinese if you ask me.

    --
    A-Bomb
    1. Re:mars by tgatliff · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Considering the current track record of NASA, you can bet on it.

    2. Re:mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone want to start laying bets on who lands a person on Mars first? It's looking more and more like the Chinese if you ask me.

      Natch. Mars is, after all, the Red planet. Bitches.

    3. Re:mars by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Anyone want to start laying bets on who lands a person on Mars first? It's looking more and more like the Chinese if you ask me.

      Good for them. We have no practical need to land humans on Mars. The bottom line is that it serves no real scientific purpose that can not be achieved better and cheaper with machines.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    4. Re:mars by king-manic · · Score: 1

      Good for them. We have no practical need to land humans on Mars. The bottom line is that it serves no real scientific purpose that can not be achieved better and cheaper with machines.

      Everybody says that but a the reason would be monetary. It's much easy to get a antionalistic government to bank role "get a man to mars to prove we're better then them" then "send 400 probes to mars for scientific reasons". So while it's mroe efficient to send 400 unmanned missions it's easier to get bankrol from attempting to send people. Also the advances in space travel ebineering that would be a required is worth it all on it's own.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    5. Re:mars by king-manic · · Score: 1

      apologies for the typos. doh!

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    6. Re:mars by Bombula · · Score: 1
      The bottom line is that it serves no real scientific purpose that can not be achieved better and cheaper with machines.

      I hear this line of argument a lot, and I'm no expert so I don't make any claims one way or the other, but looking from examples here on Earth, why do we send scientists to Antarctica, say, or deep into deserts and jungles and other remote and inaccessible places? Obviously it's not as expensive to send people, but still - can't a scientist still do better work in person than a robot on a tether?

      --
      A-Bomb
    7. Re:mars by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 1

      The track records of the two governments matters more: theirs is getting more respectful of its citizens, ours is getting more totalitarian. They seem to be prepared to pass each other going in opposite directions.
      But that is still a long ways off, so I'm betting on the US getting there first.

    8. Re:mars by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because the things that happen in those regions have an affect on the rest of us on this planet.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    9. Re:mars by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Actually NASA is just outsourcing it to China.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    10. Re:mars by utopianfiat · · Score: 2, Funny

      "We've analyzed rock samples on the planet Mars and found that, in fact, its red color is not from iron oxide, but from pure revolutionary glory- praise the people's republic!"

      --
      +5, Truth
    11. Re:mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who's to say? China will probably fake the Mars landing and stage it at a military base somewhere in China!

    12. Re:mars by evanbd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm going to guess Elon Musk (of SpaceX). They have yet to make orbit, but test flight #2 was very, very close -- and it's obvious they know what to fix. They already have a heavier launcher and manned capsule well under way, with NASA contracts to demonstrate ISS flights.

      A reporter once asked Elon whether he was creating SpaceX just so he could get a ride to orbit. He answered that if that was all he wanted, a ride on a Russian rocket would be cheaper. What the reporter didn't ask was whether he was trying to get a ride to Mars -- and creating SpaceX is probably the cheapest way to do that.

    13. Re:mars by andrewd18 · · Score: 2, Funny

      As long as they don't try to land on Europa, I think we'll be all right.

    14. Re:mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We have no practical need to land humans on Mars.

      There's an immensely practical need. You are just being short-sighted.

      The Earth is a single point of failure for humanity and, for all we know, sapient life. There are realistic potential failures that have a non-zero likelihood in the immediate future, get more likely as time goes by, and we have no chance of predicting or stopping them.

      As such, assuming that you value the existence of humanity or sapient life, it is prudent to make at least some effort towards eliminating this single point of failure by spreading humanity to other planets. Mars is the most suitable first step in this regard, thus the practical need to land humans on Mars.

      Now, by all means, argue that we should get experience with robots first, but don't argue that there isn't a practical need to land humans on Mars. We can't stay on Earth forever.

    15. Re:mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we have no practical need to do anything except eat, breathe, and fuck.

      but for some reason, we do all these other things anyway.

    16. Re:mars by div_2n · · Score: 1

      Moving beyond our planet is absolutely required for the survival of our species. Whether we get hit with a gargantuan comet or asteroid in the next 50 years or the planet gets swallowed up in a few billion years when the sun goes red giant, we are absolutely guaranteed that any and all life on earth will be destroyed at some point. It's just a matter of when. Personally, I'd prefer to start establishing self sustaining colonies on other planets and beyond ASAP.

    17. Re:mars by Pragmatix · · Score: 1

      Oh, the US will land on Mars first. But the Chinese will land 100 cheap copies of our landing immediately thereafter! :)

    18. Re:mars by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

      I'm going to guess Elon Musk (of SpaceX). They have yet to make orbit, but test flight #2 was very, very close -- and it's obvious they know what to fix. They already have a heavier launcher and manned capsule well under way, with NASA contracts to demonstrate ISS flights. I'm guessing it'll probably be SpaceX in a collaboration with Bigelow Aerospace. I could envision them using a SpaceX launch vehicle and Dragon capsule to get a crew up to orbit, where a Bigelow habitat module in a cycling orbit between the Earth and Mars would be waiting for them. Once the transit habitat arrived at Mars, they could land near an already-emplaced Bigelow ground habitat. Bigelow is already working on ways to get their self-expanding habitats to burrow into the ground and use the dirt as insulation:

      http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/02/22/ 65477.aspx?p=1
    19. Re:mars by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You have no practical need to post on Slashdot. Get back to work!

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    20. Re:mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you're a fucking retard. Get back to posting moronic nonsense.

      Oh wait, that's what you were doing.

    21. Re:mars by theolein · · Score: 1

      Man, when the Chinese land on Mars, or the Europeans, with their Aurora programme, that nation is the one with big bragging rights cojones for much of this century. You have NO idea how much Apollo earned for the US in terms of respect, and thereby also economic terms. If the Europeans/Russians/Chinese/vanuatu get there first, they will be looked up to by just about everyone else, including the US (although there will be a lot of teeth gnashing and sour grapes since the US is if anything, a terrible loser)

    22. Re:mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, lets see:
      1. One of the two original space superpowers
      2. The only space superpower left with a budget larger than that of all other space programs combined
      3. Placed first man on the Moon
      4. Was second in putting satellites and men up
      5. First to flyby Mars
      6. First to successfully land a craft on Mars that lasted longer than 80 seconds
      7. Current has a fleet of spacecraft operating from Mars
      8. First and only to explore Outer Solar System (with the exception of other organizations that joined in on a NASA mission)
      9. Has safely operated RTGs
      10. Set the standard for autonomous rover design
      11. The only space program with a >100 tonne rocket in development
      12. One of two countries to build a private space station and the major developer of the ISS
      13. >40 years of manned spaceflight experience
      14. Has an interplanetary communications network (and a Mars communications network)
      15. >6000 sols of operational lander experience on Mars
      Etc.

      And the Chinese space program? Have they even done a rendezvous in orbit? Have they even done a single flyby of Mars?

    23. Re:mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the US is if anything, a terrible loser

      You're kidding, right? When somebody else does something first that the USA wanted to do first, they just take credit for it and teach their kids it was the USA that did it first. See: the Bill of Rights, democracy in general, constitutional limitations on government, voting rights for women, abolishing of slavery, fighting the Nazis, and about a dozen major inventions such as computers. Fuck, I'm pretty sure about half of the USA thinks that Jesus was a white, English-speaking American.

      Let's compare and contrast. How many times have you heard Americans talking about how "they" invented the Internet and should have control over it? How many times have you heard Brits talking about how "they" invented the WWW and should have control over it? How many times have you heard Italians talking about how "they" invented telephones and should have control over them? Does one of those three stand out?

      This is a historical trend that shows no signs of abating. If China lands a man on Mars in thirty years time, expect Americans born fifty years from now to be arrogant about the "fact" that "they" landed a man on Mars first.

    24. Re:mars by Hucko · · Score: 1

      But they have the physics of how those were done, with USAians providing proofs that the models work well enough to be used for more advanced maneuvers.

      I don't check my dingy works with every type of maneuver every time I launch it; I just run through the basic safety check list to make sure it works with in the expected bounds. The motor on the other hand, I make sure it is running before I leave.

      My point is, sure sometimes the wheels have to be re-invented, but the Chinese engineers will probably do all the 'complicated' maneuvers in one mission. Only if things are not working as expected would they pull back and re-think how to approach it. Besides, I'm not sure a human life is necessarily as valuable to the Chinese society as it is to the USAian. Individuals may consider it so, but not the society.

      That is not in any way discrediting the USAian achievements, but recognise please that the Chinese will build on it, not repeat it.

      --
      Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
  3. I hope they make it! by KingSkippus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm not jealous. Unlike the U.S., which I honestly believe is no longer capable of carrying out a project like this (hell, we can barely keep our 26-year-old space shuttle program afloat), I hope China has a real shot at making headway in the exploration of space.

    Just because we can't do it doesn't mean that I hope it won't be done. If they can make progress where we can't, all the better!

    1. Re:I hope they make it! by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      well said - makes Joss Whedon look a little smarter too.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    2. Re:I hope they make it! by evil+agent · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I hope they do too. And hopefully it starts another space race and technological escalation.

      It's great that the Americans and Russians are working together now, but we won't make the kind of progress we made when we were in competition with each other.

      --
      End transmission.
    3. Re:I hope they make it! by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Informative
      the U.S., which I honestly believe is no longer capable of carrying out a project like this

      The project is to survey from orbit, and to explore with rovers on the ground, the Moon. The US is doing the very same right now - except on Mars.

      The only component of the project the US has not already performed is the robot sample return. NASA have never bothered with robots returning tiny samples; they seem to rub along somehow with the six massive shovel-loads of Moon rock brought back by Apollo.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    4. Re:I hope they make it! by crotherm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not jealous. Unlike the U.S., which I honestly believe is no longer capable of carrying out a project like this (hell, we can barely keep our 26-year-old space shuttle program afloat),

      How many large engineering projects have you been part of lately? None? The companies that build Apollo could do it again. Of that I am positive. All it needs is money.

       

      I hope China has a real shot at making headway in the exploration of space. sure, why not.

      Just because we can't do it

      Just because you can't do it.

      --
      "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable" - JFK
  4. of course by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

    they need it mapped at that scale for when they miniaturize themselves and swing by on their way to mars.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  5. Let's hope it shuts up Bart Sibrel by jcr · · Score: 1

    Of course, he'll probably just invent a new fantasy where China collaborates with NASA to continue a hoax.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  6. Thank goodness... by Arathon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here I was worried that China was about to wake up and discover their industrial and technological might, and crush the U.S. like a bug. It turns out they woke up alright, but instead decided to test their prowess by engaging in a multi-trillion dollar moon-ography bee.

  7. Land claim by dpilot · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So is anyone going to make a stink when China claims the Moon for themselves?

    I know there is a treaty prohibiting this, though I don't know if China is signatory, and I don't know if they care, or if they'll find a way out of it.

    But it appears that the general way if the future is: China does what China wants.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    1. Re:Land claim by stoolpigeon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's no need to 'claim' it. If any nation or group can get there, and owns the only facilities that support human life there - they don't need to claim it, they own it until someone else develops the same capability. That's the reality of it, treaties and such are nonsense in this regard.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    2. Re:Land claim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      **China does what China wants.**
      To me, that's exactly what USA is doing before, now and in the future

    3. Re:Land claim by jshriverWVU · · Score: 1
      My history teacher mentioned this before. Basically the problem isn't just getting people to the moon or mars,etc. To "own" it or claim it as your property it basically boils down to the concept that in order for you claim land as your own you have to have the ability to protect it.

      Look at the history of Sealand, same concept.

    4. Re:Land claim by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's what any sovereign nation does and has done. When they cooperate (which is seldom) they do so because they want to - or because they are forced to do so by some other country doing what it wants to do. The same works its way down to the individual level. Why should any nation do any differently?

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    5. Re:Land claim by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      But right now - just getting the people there is all that is necessary. Because until someone else can do it, being able to make the trip is all the protection that is needed.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    6. Re:Land claim by Loke+the+Dog · · Score: 1

      Lots of countries have the ability to send a warhead to the moon. Its much easier to attack the moon right now than it is to defend it. Now, one might wonder why any country would want to attack an installation on the moon, its not like one base there prevents another from being founded, and if a country has the technology to build a base there, it doesn't need the strategic value the moon might offer.

    7. Re:Land claim by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that few countries are even capable of delivering payloads to orbit. Could you fill me in on just what systems make lots of countries capable of delivering munitions to the moon? As for anyone who positions themselves on the moon - well they sit at the top of a large gravity well. I think you might want to consider this a bit more.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    8. Re:Land claim by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      Could you fill me in on just what systems make lots of countries capable of delivering munitions to the moon?

      A W88 warhead masses something like 360kg. A Saturn V rocket was capable of sending 47,000kg to the Moon, or 118,000kg to Low Earth Orbit. Assuming linear scaling, to get a payload of 360kg to the Moon would require an LEO capacity of some 900kg. Such capacity is available to the US, Europe, Russia, China, India... basically, anyone who's remotely likely ever to want to nuke a target on the Moon is capable of doing so.

      As for anyone who positions themselves on the moon - well they sit at the top of a large gravity well. I think you might want to consider this a bit more.

      A self-sufficient moonbase would be a fearsome adversary indeed. Given some form of cargo launcher - a railgun would do nicely - they could fling rocks at any target on Earth, which would strike at escape velocity. Nasty. I am not certain, however, of the strategic utility of this weapon. It would take a couple of days for the rocks to arrive, by which time their intended victims would surely have nuked the crap out of the aggressor's targets on Earth. It would make a decent deterrent - an enemy might take out all your assets on Earth, but nothing could reach the Moon quickly enough to prevent retaliation - but it's no First Strike weapon.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    9. Re:Land claim by dpilot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The question comes when the second party goes to land on the Moon, after China has established a secure foothold. What if, at any point during that other-nation mission, they make ANY sort of ownership-encumbered statement? It could be as simple as, "We grant you permission to land on the Moon at XXX location," presumably where the mission was landing, anyway. In fact, "granting exploratory permission" would be their best move, because in this case time would be on their side. Once "permission is granted," landing on the Moon could also be construed as tacit acceptance of China's authority to grant that permission. Landing without accepting permission or recognizing their authority to grant it is the diplomatic challenge. This also presumes that they're busy building on-Moon infrastructure and other nations are just sending footprints'n'flags missions. At the point where the next nation tries to establish a base, be it halfway around the Moon, is when we'd have to watch for some shooting. Incidentally, at this stage in the game it wouldn't take much in the way of weaponry to "own" the Moon. Anything installed there has serious advantages over anything Earth-launched or carried on a spacecraft from Earth.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    10. Re:Land claim by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      I'm willing to bet - though I may be wrong - 2 or maybe 3 countries in all the world currently have the existing equipment to do it. I know the Russians and U.S. have sent stuff to the moon, in the past. As has been pointed out in this thread, NASA plans to deliver another payload to the moon next year. But I haven't seen anything to indicate that such capability currently exists elsewhere.
       
      But the primary point you make is correct, in that a colony starting out on the moon would be vulnerable for a while if some nation on earth made a concerted effort to try and take it out. And I guess this would stay the case for as long as such a colony was not completely self sustaining - as cutting off supplies would be as deadly as a nuke. But I still think that realistically - getting there and staying there are the large hurdles and self defense would have to be an afterthought. And further - just being able to nuke the moon would not change 'ownership' - it would just make the moon difficult to hold for whoever could get there. Taking real-estate from someone involves boots on the ground.
       
      With Mars it would be a whole different ball game. If someone were somehow able to jump ahead of everyone else and set up a colony there - the earth would be hard pressed to have any say about what went on there - from here.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    11. Re:Land claim by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      exactly - it should pretty much follow the same pattern as colonization of the new world. the potential for conflict will ramp up as the population and capability to get there ramps up. i think that is quite a bit off into the future. outside of my lifetime for sure (I've got another 60 years or so max - barring some major breakthrough in medicine).

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    12. Re:Land claim by ksd1337 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well, wouldn't it be good to blow up the Moon? I mean, we could end women's menstrual periods for good!

    13. Re:Land claim by G-funk · · Score: 1

      Erm, you seem to be forgetting that China's valuable assets are on EARTH, where we keep the nuclear weapons - not the moon.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    14. Re:Land claim by dpilot · · Score: 1

      Right now China is looking for resources and prestige, wherever they can get them. There has been talk lately of Helium-3 laying around on the Moon - a suitable source of energy, which China has been particularly interested in. And if that doesn't pan out, there's still the prestige.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  8. The crumbling empire by PhreakOfTime · · Score: 3, Funny

    Funny how all empires fall.

    How did the US get to be such a disgrace?

    Oh. Thats how

    1. Re:The crumbling empire by stoolpigeon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      you could find people that ignorant in any population of decent size.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    2. Re:The crumbling empire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Empires are built on trade. Not invasion and occupation. Thats how the US lost it all.

    3. Re:The crumbling empire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt it. Maybe its because only 10% of Americans hold a passport.

    4. Re:The crumbling empire by crotherm · · Score: 1



      When you country is the size of Europe, why travel outside? Some places are like a foreign country. And yes, I do own and use a passport. Been to Europe 3 times. Been all over USA.

      --
      "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable" - JFK
    5. Re:The crumbling empire by PhreakOfTime · · Score: 1

      Isnt that the problem?

  9. Inches? SI! by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Don't the Chinese use centimeters like everyone else? ;-)

  10. Why? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

    Why would they do this? Unless they plan to hollow it out...

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Why? by King_TJ · · Score: 3, Funny

      They're going to counterfeit it! It's China's first step. Take a bunch of pictures and measure every detail of the prototype.... Next thing you know, the "ghost shift" working night hours at the "legitimate by day" factory will begin production of cloned moons!

    2. Re:Why? by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is, be on the lookout for the iMoon clones? Think they can build a moon that doesn't have a dark side? Then maybe I'd be interested.

      --
      What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
    3. Re:Why? by nido · · Score: 1

      Unless they plan to hollow it out... The moon already is hollow. Duh.

      Some more Moon Facts for you. :)

      --
      Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
      www.teslabox.com
    4. Re:Why? by ecklesweb · · Score: 1

      I heard that the manned landing portion of the program will be called Allopo powered by Sotern A rockets, the landing craft called Egale Oen, and in a fit of innovation they'll be taking pictures will a cellular-based device called the iHpone.

  11. The phrase has changed! by bogaboga · · Score: 1
    In the last century, it was "The Russians are coming..." This should be changed to "The Chinese are coming...". My fellow Americans, just take note. I have come to realize that I cannot live without getting a fell of China in my daily life.

    Here's why: -

    1: All my electroic stuff save my monitor are Chinese made.

    2: On my way to work, I ride on Chinese made tires.

    3: My clothing is Chinese made...the same applies to

    4: Furniture

    5: Coffee maker

    6: and so many others. I am beginning to think that these Chinese could one day place sanctions on the US...a pretty scary thought. The other day, they shot a satellite from orbit. On this front, we thought Russia was our only competition. Are we prepared?

    1. Re:The phrase has changed! by capt.Hij · · Score: 1

      Wow, it is almost as if you might read the news! Fortunately for all of us our two economies are so intertwined that this amounts to mutual assured suicide. (Let us hope that MAS is much better than MAD.) The bad news is that some political leaders on both sides probably have no problems with slitting their own country's throat just for dogma's sake.

    2. Re:The phrase has changed! by deweycheetham · · Score: 0

      What makes you think so? History is full of incidents of wars where to intertwined counties went to war. I not so sure that economic relationships insure peace and tranquility, Adam Smith be damed.

    3. Re:The phrase has changed! by coolmoose25 · · Score: 1

      An interesting analogy... let's examine it... "The Russians are coming..." - But THEY NEVER CAME! We out spent them on defense, and bankrupted their economy. Their crumbling empire finally went toes up. Now you warn us that "The Chinese are coming..." Well, let's think about that too. I grew up at a time when Japan was the economic boogie man. Everything was made in Japan - their cars were better, all the electronics went there... And I got my MBA at the height of it all. We were preached to that if the US didn't change its ways, Japan would eat our lunch. But what happened? Japan ended up in a 20 year recession which they have not even now recovered from. They started making their "Japanese" cars here in the US! So. Korea got into the car game, and now Hyundai and Kia nip at their heels. The electronics mfg. moved to Taiwan and Singapore, and now China. So what will happen when China's people, now enjoying much more economic freedom if not "real" freedom, start to demand higher wages and better standards of living? The China "miracle" can implode in exactly the same way. India stands ready to eat China's lunch, and in many ways, are already doing that... But even there the same "miracle" threatens to implode - with the rising wages and standards of living. At the end of the day, the US worker remains, if not the most, at least one of the highest, in terms of productivity. I learned through experience not to trust these doom and gloom predictions. The US may lose leads in some areas, and gain them in others, but counting us out or predicting our demise has always been a losing proposition.

      --
      Brawndo: It's what plants crave!
    4. Re:The phrase has changed! by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      but counting us out or predicting our demise has always been a losing proposition
       
      but it wont always be - it can't. so eventually they will get it right, it's just hard to tell when that will be. and it probably wont be for the reasons they think - not that it would stop people from saying 'see! we told you!' and so on.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    5. Re:The phrase has changed! by bitserf · · Score: 1

      Looking from the outside in, I'm sure the nations of Europe felt the same when the US was the nascent growing industrial power. Thing is, the US does not need to be #1 to do well. Europe is doing just fine. So will the US, when China/India become bigger superpowers.

      The only thing that will be "lost" is some sense of national pride. And then it will be the US, freed from the requirement to be #1, that will be competing and eating the Chinese/Indians for lunch. It's a cycle. And it's a numbers game. No matter which way you swing it, 400 million people simply cannot produce the output that 1.4 billion people can, when their productivity rises.

  12. In other news ... by Starteck81 · · Score: 1

    China plans to make cheap, high end moon knockoffs to sell to neighboring planets.

    --
    "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed H
    1. Re:In other news ... by Dripdry · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but they're going to be contaminated with foreign substances, so they'll just be boycotted anyway.

      --
      -
  13. More power to them. by jshriverWVU · · Score: 1

    I just hope it isn't bogged down in political red tape (pun not intended), and that this is a real science expedition, with the results freely shared among the scientist of the entire world.

  14. Samples & contamination? by MrLogic17 · · Score: 1

    I hope they've solved some of the problems getting lunar soil samples back. The Apollo program had some issues, and they never did get a sample back still sealed air-tight. http://www.mitchross.com/blog/index.php?itemid=35

  15. Re:Inches? and by mtm_king · · Score: 1

    "The moon probe project is the third milestone... and first step"....

    "The orbiter represented the first phase..."

    OK, but what is the next stage??

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  16. LRO by everphilski · · Score: 5, Informative

    Lunar Reconnaisance Orbiter launches in 2008. And NASA's mapped the moon before. Like Clementine (SDI/NASA).

    1. Re:LRO by LindaMack · · Score: 1

      Heh, I automatically read that as Lunar Rights Online

      --
      Why, let's just say I do the dirty work for the other side, no matter what side you're on

  17. Obligatory by bigattichouse · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Obligatory Heinlein reference "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress"
    To paraphrase: When you run out of room, there's always the moon.

    --
    meh
    1. Re:Obligatory by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      so if they build a magnetic catapult will rocks count as weapons of mass destruction. i know it's just sparks - but they are big sparks.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    2. Re:Obligatory by bigattichouse · · Score: 1

      Thats a funny reference, because the same book explains in great detail how to form a large terrorist organization organized by cells - and how to command and control those cells without giving away the leadership.

      --
      meh
    3. Re:Obligatory by Schaffner · · Score: 1

      "Throw rocks at them." Of course, we need to set up the railgun catapult and create a sentient computer system (a HOLMES IV would do nicely) and then we can get rid of the Lunar Authority.

  18. Bummer by xednieht · · Score: 0

    The US could have gone to moon, we went to Iraq instead... enjoy your vacation.

    --

    Hope is the currency of fools
  19. US Still WAY Ahead by coolmoose25 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is all well and good and I think China should be proud of their accomplishments in space. But the idea that the US is behind because we have concentrated on near earth orbit operations with the Shuttle and ISS programs is flawed at best. Remember that putting things like remote vehicles on the Moon is a far cry from what NASA and JPL have accomplished. We've landed PEOPLE on the moon, and plan to do that again before the next decade is out. We have put rovers on MARS - an order of magnitude more difficult than putting them on the moon. Our deep solar system probes have, by and large, produced spectacular results. The experience and capabilities that have been created by building the ISS have given NASA and our international partners a great foundation for further manned space exploration. Again, I'm not bashing China - I'm just trying to put what they are doing into perspective.

    --
    Brawndo: It's what plants crave!
  20. Imperial China? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Chinese person would never say "down to the 'inch'" ... they would say "down to the 'millimeter'".

    1. Re:Imperial China? by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      not if what they are doing is down to 25.4 mm
      then i'm guessing they'd say 25.4 mm or 2.54 cm

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  21. Off Limits. by pseudosero · · Score: 1

    We should stay away from the moon. I don't even feel the need to elaborate on this.

    --
    sometimes, nothing.
    1. Re:Off Limits. by jdigriz · · Score: 1

      All these worlds are yours except Luna, attempt no landing there? Hogwash, we've already been!

  22. Still not quite correct by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

    It's interesting the difference in terminology between the summary and the actual article...
     
    According to the summary they have "decided to" and "plan on", according to the article they "would like to" and "hope too". That's a fairly significant difference. It's also in line with articles that have previously appeared - they sound much more like the bosses of the space agency and lunar science programs stumping for funding and support than they do like accounts of real programs.
     
    Actual hard evidence to date indicates no reason to believe the Chinese program will continue at other than it's current glacial pace. (Which is kind of an insult to glaciers as it implies glaciers are as immobile as mountains.)

  23. I just watched a japanese tv program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, japan? The land of the smart asians? One of the questions in a game was to indicate on a map were T.A.T.U. came from (answer russia). The responses were shocking, not only did they get the country wrong but the location of the country as well. Offcourse this was the group Morning Musume, so we are talking teenage girls, not a group well known for their knowledgde of basic geography (MM, girls, teenage, a lethal mix)

    But what exactly goes on in the mind of a person who has to ask which way is up about a world map? Not knowing were the equator is even roughly?

    Think of a person you know that you would describe as having an average intelligence, now realise that HALF the people have an even lower intelligence. Scared yet?

    Don't be, a lot of that group of idol teenage girls got the answer RIGHT. That just isn't funny so the interviewer quickly moves on to highlight the ones who got it very wrong indeed.

    Same with the above clip, do you really think the editor gives a fair balanced view of the results of an afternoon taping? Hell, I BEEN a cameraman doing exactly those kind of street interviews and I seen myself how all the BORING but accurate answers simply get cut because they are not funny.

    You can find people who can't point out the northpole on a globe ANYWHERE and any director worth his salt can easily make it appear that they are easy to find. Next time however REALLY watch those clips and try to notice how they either change location a lot OR the sun seems to move awfully fast during a 2-3 minute segment, hints the interviewing team had to spent a lot of time finding the true idiots.

    1. Re:I just watched a japanese tv program by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      Shhh, you're going against the gospel. All people outside of Slashdot are idiot sheep, Americans in particular, and don't you ever forget it.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    2. Re:I just watched a japanese tv program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats a good post, and a great theory!

      But I think the real answer is that Americans are really really really dim.

  24. Re:Inches? SI! by Dadoo · · Score: 1

    That's still a lot of square inches: 58,842,036,065,894,390. Where are they going to store it all?

    --
    Sit, Ubuntu, sit. Good dog.
  25. Who writes this stuff? by Var1abl3 · · Score: 1

    From TFA "A full moon is visible in this 2005 view above the Earth's horizon. China plans to survey all of the moon's surface before eventually bringing bits of the planet back to Earth."

    When did the moon become a planet...???

    Bart Sibrel and others: If China does map the moon will it show the American flag still flying proudly? If so will he shut up and apologize for his mistakes... I will not hold my breath...

    Mars: WTF does mapping the moon have to do with Mars? Lets try to stay on topic here.

    Bush sucks the US suck.. Again WTF does that have to do with TFA? Go post at the dailykos or DNC I am sick of reading it on /. and you never point out how Bush has taken YOUR rights away, or how you are sitting in Gitmo... it is always some vague crap about how our rights have been taken, we torture (by taking picts of terrorist in their underwear, show me someone with missing fingers and cigarette burns on them and I will agree but embarrassing someone is NOT torture) but you can not show me ONE instance of this actually happening... oh wait it think I hear a black helicopter.... put on the tin foil hat. STFU!

    1. Re:Who writes this stuff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The moon is just a chunk of our planet. So that's exactly what they want to do: bring bits of the planet back to the planet.

  26. Re:Inches? SI! by meringuoid · · Score: 1
    That's still a lot of square inches: 58,842,036,065,894,390. Where are they going to store it all?

    Burn CDs, hand one out to everyone in the country, job done.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  27. Glacial pace? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that if you look at their pace, it has been anything but. In fact, I think that they are trying hard to not show their hand on this. They have built a LOT of infrastructure that would indicate that they will soon be doing a large number of launches (BTW, cool towers design; concrete instead of iron). Right now, they are moving at the same pace as American space companies are. Spacex, Bigelow, and Scaled all started their adventure in the 90's. And when it comes to America's pace, it took a decade to get us to space and another decade to the moon. USSR had a very similar pace as well.

    Finally, China is simply building up a dual use infrastructure (civilian and military). That is one of the main differences in the west's program. They have been kept separate.

  28. Bigelow, (armadillo|new shepard), spacex, etc by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    No one company is going to do this. It will be a multi-company missions. I think that china COULD be the first, but I am guessing that by 2025, the west will send a mission to mars. In fact, I think that by 2015, spacex/bigelow/(armadillo|blue origins) will be on the moon

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  29. Chandra by WindBourne · · Score: 2, Informative

    Do not forget that India is launching a mission shortly which includes a couple of our instruments to be able to map into dark areas as well as underground.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Chandra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instruments that Indians use to map dark areas?

      You mean like a bathroom mirror?

  30. Dark Side by CaptScarlet22 · · Score: 1

    Good luck getting pics from the dark side of the moon...Our bases will blow it up in a millisecond.

    --
    It's left blank because I have nothing to say to you punks!
  31. Re:Inches? SI! by Dadoo · · Score: 1

    Burn CDs, hand one out to everyone in the country, job done.

    Nice!

    But that only allows for around 15 bytes of information per square inch. Are you sure that's enough? You'd probably need 3 bytes for the elevation, 3 bytes for the color, and a few more for composition - and that's off the top of my head. There may be a lot more we don't know about. That's cutting it a little close, don't you think? :-)

    --
    Sit, Ubuntu, sit. Good dog.
  32. usofa does what usofa wants. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chinese race is the worst of all the entire world!!!

    aiMia Yiaai 7ai DaaIia Fia Faa iEiai
    Raia Eiaai Naa Tii Saa Paaia Oia Sai TaSiai
    iaWaa iEiaaR iiaEaai Ciaia Eiaia
    Naaiia Sii aOii aRaa iaEaa iaDa ai iaaIi
    iaai Naaia Caaiia Haaaiaa Iaaaiaaa Niiii
    Eaaa aSia iaaEaia PaaaIaaa Rii aaAaaaTii
    aEia Saai aCaia iaOaa iaPaa aiaYaii aiaIai
    aiaPiai aHiai aia Oia Nai Eia iaBia iaY
    ia ia. aaia Oaia iaRa iaia Gaia iaOaia iaia
    Fiia SiaLia iaAai aiaSia iaiaHia iaiaiDaa iiOa
    aiaTai aia iaaFai aiUiaia iCiai iaiai aiKi aiai
    ai iaiaiY iaiO iaia iUia i ia iCi aiIi aiAi ai,
    aiia iai aiN iaiai aiSi aia iaiA iai, iaii iai
    iaia a i Giai aiOi iaiVi aiai ,iaia iiaai iUia
    iSiaiA iai ai,iai iaBia iiaiUia iSii iaiH iaiai,ia
    iaii aiDiaiR iaiMiai, iaiai iaiR iaiIia iiiAi
    aiA iai, iaiai. iai aia iai. iai. aiaii

  33. Rover Wars by HannethCom · · Score: 1

    I can see it now, rover competition will heat up on the moon. The rovers will be armed with frickin laser beams in case another rover gets to close, or if a rover is close to the end of it's mission it will go into seek and destroy mode. Then the rovers will become self aware and we'll all be in trouble.

    --
    Microsoft, Apple, Google, Amazon what's the difference? All steal money from devs and control with walled gardens.
  34. They plan on mining for Helium-3 by The+Underwriter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Guys, the leaders of "The West" look ahead maybe five, ten years max. The Chinese are thinking ahead 100 years.

    They plan on mining Helium-3 from the lunar soil, for use in fusion reactions.

    Wikipedia link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helium-3 ... here's an interesting tidbit:

    -(snip)-

    It is believed that the Moon's surface has large amounts of helium-3 in the lunar regolith.[18] At the start of the 21st century several countries planned to explore the Moon and to use its resources. Helium-3 is expected to be one of those resources if a commercial fusion process is created. Yet to be determined is the exact quantity of helium-3 which the solar wind traps and deposits on the lunar surface. As of our current knowledge of lunar regolith, it is exceedingly scarce (ppb quantities mixed in with ppm quantities of He4), and may be beneath the point of economic recovery. However, processes to extract other materials from the lunar regolith could cover the majority of the energy expenditures in extraction; Helium-3 extraction might be piggybacked on these processes.

    Cosmochemist and geochemist Ouyang Ziyuan from the Chinese Academy of Sciences who is now in charge of the Chinese Lunar Exploration Program has already stated on many occasions that one of the main goals of the program would be the mining of helium-3, from where "each year three space shuttle missions could bring enough fuel for all human beings across the world."[19]

    In January 2006 the Russian space company RKK Energiya announced that it considers lunar helium-3 a potential economic resource to be mined by 2020.[20]

    -(snip)-

    Regarding funding for our own ailing space program, by the time the American sheeple wake-up and this actually becomes an issue that the politicians can use to run for re-election, it will be FAR too late.

    My advice: learn to speak Mandarin. My wife and I are doing it already.

    "All your base are belong to us."

    1. Re:They plan on mining for Helium-3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure why people get so excited about He3 on the moon. Sure it's a cleaner reaction but:

      1.) We don't even have the ability to usefully fuse hydrogen yet, which occurs at much lower temperatures.

      2.) He3 can be synthesized here on earth via DD fusion or tritium decay.

      3.) At the expected density of He3 on the moon, you would have to process on the order of the volume of the Grand Coulee Dam (which took something like 8 years to construct with thousands of workers and tons of heavy equipment) in lunar regolith to recover enough for a year's supply of fuel.*

      * I calculated this once, but don't remember the numbers now.

  35. China won't make it by amightywind · · Score: 1

    China has flown into space twice in 4 years. They won't launch another manned mission until 2008. All with Soyuz technology they bought from the Russians.Indeed, China's program seems moribund.

    If you want to take note of a vigorous non-US Japan lunar program, look at Japan. They are already is already beating China to the moon with the very advanced Selene mission. I think Japan will be Asia's space success story. Why so downbeat on NASA's moon plans? The ISS commitments are being kept. The shuttle assembly flights are damned impressive. Why should they fail in the lunar mission? The Ares space architecture seems right. Other nations have certainly proposed nothing better.

    --
    an ill wind that blows no good
    1. Re:China won't make it by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

      Well, I can't speak for the parent poster, but China does have one (and only one) advantage over the US. They can tolerate human causalities. We lost seven astronauts and didn't fly a shuttle mission for years, but I suspect the Chinese would not have halted flights. They'd just say that the dead astronauts were heroes and keep doing what they'd been doing.

      Of course, it's hard to imagine that we'd not beat the Chinese to the moon anyway, as long as the funding remains intact. Even if funding is cut, it's easy to imagine that experienced engineers from nasa could bring their expertise to the private sector and still get the job done before the Chinese. I mean, we've done it before. That's a pretty big advantage.

  36. As I mentioned before you by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    they will probably combine that with armadillo or new shepard. Even though they are being suppose to take off from earth, they will really shine on the moon. In particular, if they can turn it into a means to lower or pickup a device, they would really win out. But yeah, I think that the 3 or 4 companies will be colonizing the poles within 8 years.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:As I mentioned before you by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

      > they will probably combine that with armadillo or new shepard.

      Quite possible. Now that I think about it, a VTOL approach like Armadillo's or New Shephard's would be ideal for a Mars lander which could also be used to relaunch crew. It's too bad neither company has done anything with methane propulsion, which they'd probably want to take advantage of in-situ resources on Mars. Perhaps they'd license tech from XCOR?

    2. Re:As I mentioned before you by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      I do not recall, but I thought that one of them was working with XCOR. If so, XCOR will probably make it easy to swap engines (at least I hope so). But as to rocket design, it would be good if either have a system where it can ring the payload similar to the recently launched mars polar lander. If they do that, then the rocket can lower the payload and then head back to space. All in all, I would guess that armadillo or new shepard would end up being simple trucks from orbit to surface and back.

      The one part that is missing is that Bigelow or somebody should consider how to make a tug. Russia has been pushing for that with their new design. But one of these companies (perhaps xcor) could create a simple tug engine that could hook to bigelows (or perhaps dragon) and push items around in space. In fact, Xcor's use of buytl rubber/NO might work great for this

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  37. Missing the point by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    This isn't about US vs. China, it's about He3 mining.

    What the USA should really be doing is diverting some of its military trillions and making this into a global venture.

    --
    No sig today...
  38. Pointless? by chiseen · · Score: 0

    No matter how hard you look, there is no cheese on the moon.

  39. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm so tired of hearing about the "plans" everyone is making nowadays. It's like saying Jamaica announced today their second interstellar warp drive capable craft will be ready somewhere around 2256. Quit trying to scare me, it's not working. Sure it's possible, but how many people will communist China throw to the lions to achieve it? Hmm? They(communists) don't give a **** about anyone outside of the bigger cities and even then it's a "don't screw up or the goulag for you" mentality. In the end it won't work. It's the same thing at the Olympics. How many people have they basically gone through and destroyed just to have the "perfect" competitor? Thousands?

    Basically they have little natural talent(I heard they had to copy another technology again... iPhone anyone? Heaven forbid they(communists) actually invent something.) and are trained as drones under the communist regime. Call me when they topple their government. Maybe the US and China can actually get something done together then.

    Basically the headline could have also read "Communist China's Space Propaganda On The Rise Again".

  40. Make sure you dont print CCCP on the side! by AHuxley · · Score: 1
    In Capitalist China you must listen to lecture about moon survey.
    In Soviet Russia no more Luna 16 museum exhibit for you.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luna_16

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  41. Racist comment by wisebabo · · Score: 1

    "Basically they have little natural talent"

    Despite the fact this is a blatently racist comment, I think it should be obvious to anyone familiar with research in the U.S. that a great percentage is done by Chinese graduate students/professors. Just look at recent citations in bio-tech/physics/semiconductors/chemistry/nano-tec hnology. The number of high-tech companies run by or with high level technology officers who are of Chinese descent is huge. Needless to say, if the Chinese are kept out/were kept out of this country, the industries that depend on talented individuals would collapse. Perhaps that is why Microsoft has built one of their largest (the largest?) research labs there: http://research.microsoft.com/aboutmsr/presskit/ba ckgrounders/asia_bg.aspx

    Fortunately I think most slashdotters understand this so I won't bother to elaborate further. (I remember similar comments made about the Japanese and Koreans before they started kicking our butts in consumer electronics, semiconductors, automobiles, etc.). I'm even curious to know how many Chinese slashdotters there are out there. (I'm not one).

    1. Re:Racist comment by yelz · · Score: 1

      I am Chinese, and I am pround of the achievement in Space made by China