Slashdot Mirror


3D Animations In Mid-Air Using Plasma Balls

An anonymous reader clues us to research at Japan's National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology that has produced the ability to make animations by creating small plasma balls in mid-air. The technology doesn't use vapor or strange gases, just lasers to heat up oxygen and nitrogen molecules above the device: up to 1,000 brilliant dots per second, which makes smooth motion possible. When the tech improves it could be used for street signs or advertising.

57 of 234 comments (clear)

  1. Oblig... by band-aid-brand · · Score: 5, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new lethally hot gas based advertisement overlords...

    1. Re:Oblig... by sentientbeing · · Score: 2, Funny

      You own Google?

      --

      ------
      beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his mind he dreams himself your master
  2. pink tentacle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm not clicking that link.

  3. Can't wait... by Hsensei · · Score: 2, Funny

    Till the new nike or coke ad hits a planes and lights it on fire!

    --
    ~
  4. Old news by Oddscurity · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here's the press release it links to. Sadly both the article and the press release are from February 2006...

    --
    Indeed!
    1. Re:Old news by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think I requested it to slashdot back then too... It got rejected. I think it was replaced with some story about a cool new case mod, perhaps a minor Linux kernel upgrade.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:Old news by include($dysmas) · · Score: 3, Informative

      slashdot gets it wrong again ... current story is here

      http://www.pinktentacle.com/2007/07/aist-improves- 3d-projector/

  5. cool but Yikes! by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Funny

    It uses high power lasers to heat the air into a "plasma" when running it has the sounds of crackles as mini explosions occur.

    Oh yeah, that's a display I want. Instead of the cat blocking the screen, the cat bursts into flames. How the heck am I going to explain that one to the wife?

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:cool but Yikes! by Bluesman · · Score: 5, Funny

      "How the heck am I going to explain that one to the wife?"

      I'd say this:

      Why do you keep talking about this cat, honey? For the millionth time, we NEVER HAD A CAT. I think you need to see a doctor.

      It's a pretty healthy way to help loved ones deal with loss.

      --
      If moderation could change anything, it would be illegal.
    2. Re:cool but Yikes! by megaditto · · Score: 5, Funny

      Instead of the cat blocking the screen, the cat bursts into flames. How the heck am I going to explain that one to the wife?
      Tell her that her pussy is smokin'-hot?

      sorry, sorry
      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    3. Re:cool but Yikes! by treeves · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Informative? You people are sick. And I mean that in a good way.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    4. Re:cool but Yikes! by tgd · · Score: 5, Funny

      Probably better than telling her that her pussy smells like burnt hair, I suppose.

    5. Re:cool but Yikes! by Alpha830RulZ · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or that her pussy smells like hot meat.

      --
      I was taught to respect my elders. The trouble is, it's getting harder and harder to find some.
    6. Re:cool but Yikes! by Loligo · · Score: 4, Funny


      Remember the time it fried her cat? And then you lied and said she never had a cat? Then why'd she have the litterbox, Bluesman? Why'd she have the litterbox?

        -l

    7. Re:cool but Yikes! by SchmellsAngel · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's a Bento Box for dogs.

      --
      We must repeat.
    8. Re:cool but Yikes! by Minwee · · Score: 3, Funny

      I really think you're going to have to come up with a better explanation than that, Dr. Schrödinger.

  6. Re:News? by Himring · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yea, I saw this, like, a year ago. It took all of 2 seconds to scroll down and find a date going back over a year and a half ago.

    Time for my first ever usage of ye ol' russian joke: On /. news breaks you!

    --
    "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
  7. "Street signs or advertising" by smclean · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hah, who sees an amazing technology like this and immediately begins thinking about its potential use for advertising? To me, its use in advertising seems like the only downside to this technology..

    "Guys!! I just heard that they came up with a way to project images directly in to your brain! Awesome, think of the *commercials*!! "

    --

    "'Yrch!' said Legolas, falling into his own tongue."

    1. Re:"Street signs or advertising" by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Guys!! I just heard that they came up with a way to project images directly in to your brain! Awesome, think of the *commercials*!! " But not in our dreams. Only on TV and radio, and in magazines, and movies, and at ball games... and on buses and milk cartons and T-shirts, and bananas and written on the sky. But not in dreams, no siree.
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    2. Re:"Street signs or advertising" by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 2, Funny

      I for one can't wait until this hits advertising. The prospect of insanely expensive, bleeding-edge display tech that even my social conscience thinks I should steal excites me greatly.

    3. Re:"Street signs or advertising" by marcosdumay · · Score: 2, Funny

      That will be HOT!!

  8. What the hell? by east+coast · · Score: 3, Funny

    While it's at least mildly interesting I had a real problem with one of the linked sources. Not the linked source itself but the obviously photoshopped cruise liner.

    What the hell is that all about? I know that it may be able to swing this in the future but let's not get out of hand. Not to mention that my 12 year old nephew is a better photoshop hacker.

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    1. Re:What the hell? by MajinBlayze · · Score: 4, Funny

      Photoshop? Don't give them that much credit; it looks like they made the picture using MS Word

      --
      "Hate is baggage. Life's too short to be pissed off all the time." Danny Vinyard -American History X
    2. Re:What the hell? by pimpimpim · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Simple psychology: by showing that they are crap in photoshopping, you are more inclined to believe the other other pics that don't look photoshopped will probably be real. Do we need to explain everything out here! ;)

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
  9. Star Wars by JoeDuncan · · Score: 5, Funny

    So am I finally going to be able to play holo-chess against a wookie?

    1. Re:Star Wars by jimstapleton · · Score: 3, Funny

      ppft, screw holo-chess, I want an authentic looking light saber!

      Actually, it probably *WILL* burn whatever it hits too!

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    2. Re:Star Wars by freeweed · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, but he'll tear your arms out of their sockets if he loses.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    3. Re:Star Wars by BlackCobra43 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I like how you seem to be mostly concerned about your supply of adequate holo-chess equiment and not of giant furry humanoids from the planet Kashyyyk.

      --
      I never spellcheck and I freely admit it. Save your karma for more worthwhile "lol erorrs" replies
  10. Back to the Future then? by roman_mir · · Score: 2, Funny

    So a giant holo-shark appearing in the air abouve you and then twisting above you and closing its jaws right on you can be created in the air with lasers? I need a Delorean and a 1955 sports almanac. Also I am going to a corner drug store to get some plutonium unless Mr. Fusion is in business already.

  11. Street signs and advertising? I THINK NOT! by alta · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Forget it, that's not the early adopters.

    It'll be used for video games and pr0n. We all know who gets tech first. The problem I see is that it heats up they air to the point that when you get too excited and attempt to touch... You loose a hand or other appendage.

    --
    Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
  12. Lightsaber anyone? by Thansal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Make me a portable version of this and I can finally have my friken LIGHTSABER!

    --
    Do Or Do Not, There Is No Spoon, There Is Only Zuul. Everything in the above post is probably opinion.
  13. Polluting? by Lazarian · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Wouldn't heating oxygen and nitrogen in air with lasers to the point of making glowing plasma also create ozone and nitric oxides? This sounds like it would be the same as having dozens of electric arcs going off in mid air.

    As much as I like the idea of being assailed with even more ads everywhere I look, this seems to be a very environmentally harmful idea. Along with harmful gases being produced by plasma discharges, it would be noisy as well, not to mention that displays like this would give off UV light as well, just like an electric arc. Bad idea.

    1. Re:Polluting? by mikael · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As long as they put the device in a sealed box, this would not be a problem. Maybe they could use neon/argon gas as they do with ordinary tubes, thus eliminating the danger of creating oxides.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    2. Re:Polluting? by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 2, Informative

      Lightning from thunderstorms do this on a grand scale every day. Probably won't be an issue outdoors, or in a confined area with ventilation.

      --
      Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

      http://financialpetition.org/
    3. Re:Polluting? by StikyPad · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's why I'm working on my Laser Retinal Projector (patent pending) which aims the lasers directly at the retina. Since the eye is sealed system, there's virtually no danger of toxic gases! What's more, it offers a high degree of privacy, and if you're forgetful it can literally etch the images into your mind for life.*

      *Limit of one etch per mind.

      WARNING: Looking directly at the Laser Retinal Projector may cause minor explosions of the eye.

  14. Re:Short on Information by griffjon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It seems that the light is coming from the plasma, not the laser, so changing colors might not work. Also, you have to have one laser per pixel. I'd imagine to have two balls, one directly above another, you'd have to be able to tilt another laser to focus its beam at that location (if that makes any sense)

    Also - the current display can make 1000 balls? meh. That's a 10px x 10px x 10px display. It's awesome, sure, but the photoshop jobs they're showing are a LONG way off; right now we're looking more at led scroller type displays.

    --
    Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
  15. Very cool, but not likely to be used... by Darlok · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well, first, this is sadly old news. The technology was actually exhibited at SIGGRAPH 2006 in Boston last July. It's pretty cool, but I'm not sure it would ever be put to practical use, at least in its current form.

    For one thing, it's loud! Every plasma ball makes a sizzling pop as it winks in and out of existence. Now magnify that by thousands of times as it scans out a 3D wireframe... the entire area for quite a distance surrounding fills with an ear-splitting sound of angry electric bees. There was talk of putting it on buildings to run electronic billboards in cities, but anyone within a few blocks would need ear protection to co-exist with it!

    Very cool stuff, but we're a loooong way from 3D open-air advertising.

    --
    Notice: Your mouse has been moved. Windows will now restart so this change can take effect.
  16. Re:did anyone notice... by querist · · Score: 2, Informative

    If my memory serves (and this is not my area of expertise), eye protection is standard operating procedure for anything that could be considered a high-power laser. This is sort of like when they use tethers for testing things that go above the ground. It is a "safety" precaution required more by insurance companies than reality. (Such as when testing a new elevator design, a "home-built" helicopter that has already passed the FAA inspections for the current phase, etc.)

    I suspect that these people are smart enough not to look directly into the lasers. The eye protection is as much a reminder to others that you need to wear eye protection when working with lasers and a requirement from the insurance company as it is realistic protection.

    Again, the eye protection works, but I sincerely doubt that these people are dumb enough to look into the lasers.

    This is like the guy on "New Yankee Workshop" who always gives his 30+ spiel on wearing safety glasses and following all instructions in the manual. Anyone who does that much woodworking with those kinds of power tools (huge bench-based units) should already know that stuff, but for reasons that I suspect include liability concerns Mr. Abrams reminds us every week to wear our safety glasses.

    -Q

  17. Some video by desideria · · Score: 5, Informative

    There's video of the projector in action here

  18. YouTube video... by CyberSnyder · · Score: 4, Informative
  19. If I'm not mistaken... by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...plasma balls in mid-air is one of the things needed for a fusion reactor.

    --
    The game.
  20. Unintended side effects by Caerdwyn · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Interesting stuff. However, I'd be concerned about unintended side effects... specifically, nitrous oxide and ozone.

    When you heat up an oxygen-nitrogen gas mix to those temperatures, you will get nitrous oxide and ozone. This is not just a problem with cool little sparky devices. Hydrogen-oxygen fuel systems (think: Saturn V) may produce only water vapor, but at such a high temperature from the exhaust, the oxygen-nitrogen atmosphere does its thing and... nothing you'd want to breathe.

    And ozone, while very nice for blocking UV rays, is a carcinogen when inhaled.

    THE WORLD WILL KILL YOU! film at eleven, Jim Cummings narration.

    That being said, I'd certainly love to see a demo. If they can somehow deal with the ozone/NO2 hazard, this could be a blast. "Help me, Obi-Wan, you're my only hope"

    --
    Everybody gets what the majority deserves.
  21. Attracting lightening by Iowan41 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yeah, let's ionize the air in a column!

  22. Sharks? No. Mosquitos? YES! by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Growing up in a mosquito infested area, I often thought that someday, an anti-mosquito laser system could be developed.

    This technology could possibly do that. If it can focus a laser on a particular spot long enough to make plasma out of air, it can zap a skeeter!

    And you thought a bug-zapper was entertaining...

  23. up to 1,000 brilliant dots per second by noidentity · · Score: 3, Funny

    Come on, 640 brilliant dots per second should be enough for anybody!

  24. here's a youtube video of it in action by jollyreaper · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://youtube.com/watch?v=He2QTpelAjE

    Kind of hard to see what they're doing at first, you might think it's just projected onto the wall, but then the camera pans around and you now see the lights against an open window. Yup, 3D. About at the level of pong right now, monochromatic voxels doing simple stuff, but you can easily extrapolate where they're going to go with it. Return of the Jedi Death Star display within 10 years? I think so. :)

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  25. Re:Sharks? No. Mosquitos? YES! by Nossie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    not going to happen... they'd rather use the tech to pound you with advertising than actually doing something useful.

  26. Re:Sharks? No. Mosquitos? YES! by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 3, Funny

    Can you imagine the crazy pyrotechnics that could be achieved with this sort of thing?

    Heh... it would be fun to take one of these things and set it up near a village of primitives. You could be the face of God :P

    --
    -1 Uncomfortable Truth
  27. Re:Sharks? No. Mosquitos? YES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    No need to try to track and shoot the things...

    If we don't actively track and kill mosquitoes with laser beams, then the terrorists have won
  28. Not just a vacuum cleaner by CustomDesigned · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The propane tank is used to generate CO2 (queue global warming rants here). Mosquitos are attracted to CO2 because that is how they locate their prey. When they fly close enough, then the vacuum cleaner comes into play. Zapping them is no good because they don't like ozone (so the plasma ball suggested elsewhere would not attract mosquitos - it would kill lots of moths, however). To be effective in protecting your event, the CO2 generator needs to be upwind. Mosquitos follow CO2 plumes upwind toward their victims using biotech similar to lobsters (compare the concentration detected between two antenna and turn toward the stronger, the greater the difference, the greater the adjustment - simple and effective). Those downwind of the BBQ will likely head toward that instead, so put the BBQ off to one side relative to the breeze.

    1. Re:Not just a vacuum cleaner by Mathinker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You lack imagination; the original poster was assuming that another part of the system would be able to, in a large volume of space (e.g., your living room), detect and correctly classify flying insects as a mosquito, rather than merely attracting it with some kind of bait. The plasma ball would be formed on-the-fly around the mosquito, killing it.

      Frankly, I'd be nervous about having that kind of automatically controlled laser capability in my living space. Maybe you thought about that too, and assumed the poster couldn't possible mean what I think he meant....

  29. Re:Sharks? No. Mosquitos? YES! by Bluesman · · Score: 5, Funny

    I like the way you think.

    But what we really need is a way to control mosquitos so that they can swarm to form advertisements. Then we'd get the laser bug zapper for free.

    --
    If moderation could change anything, it would be illegal.
  30. That's true by Poromenos1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And space is one of the things needed for a space elevator!

    --
    Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
  31. Re:did anyone notice... by puppet10 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Eye protection is required for high power lasers because depending on the power (and wavelength) even diffuse (non-specular) reflections off a surface can be hazardous.

    They are also important since it is possible the beam path could suddenly change from a bumped mirror or malfunctioning controller and present the beam to an eye. You couldn't close your eyes fast enough to prevent damage with a high power laser (high enough power and the eye lid won't even help obviously).

    The pain in the ass thing about laser goggles is that they make the laser you are working with invisible (if it isn't already a non-visible wavelength). Imagine if the shop glasses on the New Yankee Workshop rendered all the sharp spinning metal items non-visible - wouldn't that be a fun shop to work in?

    --
    -------- This space intentionally left blank --------
  32. Re:Sharks? No. Mosquitos? YES! by fractoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I always wanted to make one of these! Passive sonar to locate the bug, and then a laser tracking system to set the little bugger on fire. :) Never got past the safety aspect though - I mean, we're talking about using a laser strong enough to punch a hole in a mozzie, being aimed around the room and fired by a system that could well just decide based on a strange echo to pop you in the eye. I'll take itchy over permanent blindness, tyvm. :/

    Other ideas were the same tracking system attached to a nerf gun, an automated micro-water-jet system (think an archer fish), or even something funky with focussed sound waves and constructive interference. ;)

    --
    Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
  33. Re:Sharks? No. Mosquitos? YES! by Plutonite · · Score: 2, Funny

    And you could initiate mating festivals by playing pr0n. Pr0n from the heavens! You know you like it..

  34. Re:Sharks? No. Mosquitos? YES! by pakar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    hmm... Another thing that might work could be to have multiple sources for the energy.. (i'm no laser expert :)

    But my idea, have a system with maybe 20-30 lasers that all focus their low-power beams on a single point. 10x20mW lasers should(?) have a total effect of 200mW, but ofcourse if you hit different parts of the bug it will probably not have any effect on the bug itself... Maybe put 10 lasers in a row instead of all around the room could make it a bit easier to hit the same spot, but then again, if the system thought your eye where a mosquito... :)