Slashdot Mirror


A First Look At Red Hat Developer Studio

juanignaciosl writes "The first beta of Red Hat Developer Studio was published yesterday. RHDS seems promising. This IDE is a bunch of Eclipse plugins that comes from the fusion of JBoss IDE and Exadel Studio. The main advantages it offers are: JSF development improved, in particular integrating RichFaces and Ajax4JSF libraries; Seam (next J2EE middleware standard?) integration; and plugins for JBoss, Hibernate... Here are my first impressions."

8 of 149 comments (clear)

  1. But does it support JCV by DelitaTheFridge · · Score: 1, Informative

    I need an integrated IDE solution to support the latest JBC and WAJAX 2.1.2 standards, along with full SDJ support. Can this do that? Seriously, do these flavor of the month java libraries mean anything to anyone?

  2. Re:You mean... by LinuxGeek · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yup, they are still around despite the best efforts of SCO. And RH is making useful and relevant (cross-distro too) tools unlike the Me crap from SCO. I am running this on ubuntu and can even deploy on different platforms! Sounds like RedHat is confident in the quality of their products, unlike that sue-happy company.

    --

    Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see. - Mark Twain
  3. Re:Sounds promising.. by ianare · · Score: 2, Informative

    There are several IDEs for linux, my favorites: boa-constructor, glade.

  4. Re:Sounds promising.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    try netbeans (www.netbeans.org). it's fairly straight forward, and has a nice gui builder for swing called matisse. it's drag and drop from a palette.

    personally, I use eclipse with swtbuilder and other stuff, but netbeans out-of-the-box experience is much better.

  5. Some info about our project by _marshall · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hey everyone.. I work on the JBossTools and RHDS Team and just wanted to give some community-level info about our project.

    Red Hat Developer Studio is our commercial offering of the JBossTools open source project (formerly known as JBossIDE), which has a vibrant community of users and contributors. You can check out our project(s) at the following URLs:

    JBossTools main page: http://jboss.org/tools
    JBossTools blog: http://jbosstools.blogspot.com/
    JBossTools 2.0.0.beta3: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group _id=22866&package_id=242269&release_id=531957
    RHDS 1.0.0.beta1 (based on JBossTools 2.0.0.beta3): http://www.redhat.com/developers/rhds/index.html

    Feel free to drop by #jbosstools on freenode, we'd love to hear from you!

  6. Re:Sounds promising.. by thelima · · Score: 2, Informative

    De gustibus not dispu^H^H^H^Hblah, blah, blah. But You know - I could hardly consider development environment something without support of unit-testing built-in (don't tell me about VSTS). I could sacrifice all graphical wizards for single one feature of Eclipse IDE which is not available in VS.NET (without third party plugins) - live compilation together with quick fixes. To give You feeling, when I have a bug it is immediately highlighted (no save no magic keystrokes). Not only this but also I can see *ALL* dependent resources as "invalid". I sut, the, simply press CTRL+1 I usually get useful quick fixes offered by IDE. Such as: surround with try catch, initialize plus dozen other. See Quick Fixes in Eclipse. Of course there is much more juicy details unavailable in VS. Light years ahead refactorisation, far, far better auto-complete (in VS.NET is just a toy, nothing comparable to eclipse), excellent support for team-programming - just two words - Mylar and Team support - show me something comparable to structural diffs in VS.NET. Should I write more? VS.NET is just below average IDE, with lot's of useless Wizards You will never use in real life, but lacking some *crucial* thing others have for Years. I could bet, I can write comparable java webapp without fancy wizards faster than You wit those wizards...

  7. Re:Jesus Christ, will someone please rip off ASP.N by wzzzzrd · · Score: 2, Informative

    try wicket. no xml, no navigation rules, not a single piece of code in your markup files (it's simply not possible), ALL logic is in the java files. no stupid bean mapping to forms, a component concept (oh, there i can download a tabbed panel component, let's do this) that actually works. it really is what i think MVC should be like.

    and a very good api design, KISS, no overhead and all that core servlet stuff is hidden from you.

    --
    On second thought, let's not go to Camelot. It is a silly place.
  8. Re:If you want a GREAT development environment... by FlyingGuy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Correction to my last.. CodeGEAR.com I think I am getting old.

    --
    Hey KID! Yeah you, get the fuck off my lawn!