Slashdot Mirror


Another Way To Erase Memories

amigoro writes "Neuroscientists have discovered that long-term memories are not etched in a stable form, like a 'clay tablet,' as once thought. The process is much more dynamic, involving a miniature molecular machine that must run constantly to keep memories going. Jamming the machine briefly can erase long-term memories." A few months back we discussed a similar removal of rat memories by a different method.

44 of 232 comments (clear)

  1. I can see the benefits to this technology by Late-Eight · · Score: 5, Funny

    If they get to a point where they are able to target specific memories, for example it could be very helpful to people that have suffered a traumatic event. But from the article it sounds like it's just a plan old memory wiper by switching off a running process, and there's no real control over what gets erased. I suppose that's OK if you really don't mind losing the last couple of years.

    I am sure there's a list of negative points that could be made against this technology, I just cant remember what they are.
    1. Re:I can see the benefits to this technology by morari · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Erasing traumatic events is not helpful. Learning to accept and cope with a past traumatic event is. People that run and hide aren't people that we need around, we already have too many of them without the advent of memory wipes.

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    2. Re:I can see the benefits to this technology by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 2

      The MIB just flash a pen at you and they tell you what you remember.

    3. Re:I can see the benefits to this technology by OG · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Exactly. It's interesting, no question, but not necessarily practical.

      In order for something like this to be practical, it needs to disrupt reconsolidation. That is, as the theory goes, when a memory is accessed, there is an active process to "re-store" that memory. What would be needed in this treatment is some agent (whether pharmacological or electric or magnetic or whatever) that blocks the reconsolidation process. Then in a clinical setting, that treatment would be delivered, a doctor would guide one through the memory recollection process, and the memory would be "lost" after being accessed. That's the idea, anyway. There may be a few other memories lost in the process, but it would probably be worth it for people having flashback-based episodes (or possibly even addiction), but it's wouldn't be a whitewashing like this ZIP-based method.

    4. Re:I can see the benefits to this technology by OG · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm going to have to disagree with you here. There are some cases where "accepting and coping" isn't an option. And I'm not talking about an in "Eternal Sunshine"-my-girlfriend-broke-up-with-me-and-I'm-r eally-sad type of way. I'm talking about cases where, because of bugs in the fear machinery, people's brains are in an error state that "coping with" can't reverse. Just as cells have normal parameters for homeostasis in which everything functions correctly, so do mental processes. In severe cases, we're not talking about just the psyschological realm. We're talking about gene transcription, protein levels, etc, that are outside of their normal boundaries, and that type of problem isn't easily (or even not so easily) helped by cognitive therapy and coping alone.

    5. Re:I can see the benefits to this technology by thanatos_x · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, obviously rape victims should accept this fact and get on with life.

      I can accept we have far too many people with a victim mentality; I can accept that this has a large potential for abuse. I can't say that someone who can't live a normal life because of a traumatic event in the past shouldn't get treatment. Yes it will be a very ethically complex drug even if it worked perfectly, but to deny all uses of the drug? I imagine it might also have some uses in military personel, but... yes, it's a very slippery slope.

      --
      I am not an expert. If I am misled in something, please correct me.
    6. Re:I can see the benefits to this technology by jollyreaper · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Hmmmm, interesting bio weapon....instead of killing the society destroy their ability to remember and create a massive slave class instead....sounds like a bad sci-fi novel. Having humans in charge of such tech can be dangerous as with this we can manipulate history.

      Paranoia aside finding ways to keep the memories from being lost will be a big boone to the increasing Alzheimer's issue. Already been kinda sorta done. David Brin short story, archaeologists are going through the landfills of the 20th century for research and start finding skeletons. At first they're thinking it's a few mob murders but they end up finding hundreds, thousands, millions. More landfills are excavated and they wind up with enough skeletons to account for a population approaching the entire United States. No answer was even provided in the story but the one I came up with was body snatcher aliens who replaced the existing humans, chucked the bodies, and took over living as humans, not letting their children know what had really occurred.

      A story involving precise memory manipulation like this goes beyond mere Manchurian Candidates, you'd be looking at Memento meets Cold War spy movie. Who is the enemy? What do they know? What do they know that you know? What do they know that you used to know that they don't want you to find out? Do they know that you know that they know that you know that they know that you know? I think synapses would be burnt out just trying to cope.

      I had a story idea along these lines, not with memories but with not knowing who is who. Humans lack FTL travel but do have FTL communications via ansible. Humanity is spread across thousands of lightyears in millions of communities and a pervasive metaverse keeps society connected. An eccentric character grows tired of remote experiences, even if they are as keen as real life experience, and he decides to go see his favorite star system personally. He purchases a starship, goes into cryo and makes the voyage. He comes to decades later in a system devoid of human life. Everything is in blasted ruin. He logs back into the metaverse and the system is still there, pretty as you please. He investigates and finally discovers that there is a device of unknown origin sitting at the system's ansible junction. It is providing a high fidelity simulation of the entire ruined system, as if it had never been destroyed.

      Who destroyed the system? Why did they do it? Where are they going next? How many systems still exist, how many have been wiped out? Is he the last human? The alien infiltrators are already in the metaverse, you cannot tell if who you are speaking to is really human or alien or mere simulacrum. How can you fight an enemy you cannot even prove is real? Paranoia will destroy ya but that doesn't mean they aren't out to get you.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    7. Re:I can see the benefits to this technology by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Geez...I dunno what the problem is.

      I'm having more and more problems every day remembering most anything...and I have GREAT things I wanna remember. Short term is even worse....

      Think they could do research to help us KEEP more in memory?

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    8. Re:I can see the benefits to this technology by gstoddart · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, obviously rape victims should accept this fact and get on with life.

      We're not saying "get over it", but it really can't be healthy to just be able to wipe out anything painful in your life any time you like.

      Some people would probably end up blanking out huge portions of their lives. You might also lose the ability to make smart choices. If you wiped your memory, you might not know to be cautious in certain situations (or not not trust specific people). As shitty as they can be, your experiences are what you learn from. (Yeah, I know, I sound like Kirk.) Just blanking them out can't be any more healthy than having to live with them.

      Watch Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind some time. Yes, it's fiction, but it does try to look at the consequences of being able to do such things.

      And for me (though I could be just paranoid about such things) I'm not really willing to let someone muck about in my brain unless it's for life-saving purposes. I'd rather deal with whatever reality throws me than let someone fuck around with my neurons. They're gonna need a couple of decades to give me any confidence in this procedure -- wipe out enough neurons, and you spend your days with colouring books and drooling on yourself.

      There might be some cases where this might be a treatment of last resort. But, I think there's a fairly high threshold of acceptability/safety which needs to be addressed.

      Cheers
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    9. Re:I can see the benefits to this technology by ehrichweiss · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Have you ever considered what happens if there is no possibility of "learning to accept and cope" with the traumatic event? I'll tell you what happens, you exist in a living hell until dead.

      I have PTSD and can tell you that I can accept it all I want but there's no way to cope with recurring nightmares and flashbacks triggered by, you guessed it, memories that I would rather have buried and forgotten. The absence of those memories would give me no trigger..no reference point for the brain to repeatedly recall the "event" when someone mentions something *remotely* connected to the event. Think of it like cutting cancer out of your body and then getting it all over again, and stronger than before, when someone mentions "radioactivity", "surgery", "health care" or "knitting"(ala those hand knitted caps for cancer patients).

      I'd rather "run and hide" than be subject to the potential of killing/injuring everyone around me when I'm startled by loud noises.

      --
      0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
    10. Re:I can see the benefits to this technology by kalirion · · Score: 4, Funny

      I imagine it might also have some uses in military personel, but... yes, it's a very slippery slope.

      The first rule of Operation Treadstone is you do not remember Operation Treadstone.

    11. Re:I can see the benefits to this technology by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I can verify this from personal experience. When I was a teenager I had a bad drug experience that messed up my thought processes. I had a panic reaction that fed itself; a fear of being afraid. Because the fear was of fear itself, I found myself unable to control it because the moment I believed I might be starting to panic, panic immediately ensued because I was panicking about panicking. It sounds weird I know but it was a feedback loop of fear and panic that was very difficult to control. People talk about "panic attacks" and I am not sure if this is the same thing, but I can tell you that it was a really awful thing to go through. I can say without hesitation that it was the worst feeling I have ever had in my life; in fact I believe that it is the worst feeling I am capable of feeling, because my entire mental faculty was devoted to feeling panic. There was nothing else. I told myself that if I couldn't get over it, I would kill myself because it would be better to be dead. And I believe I would have carried through on that. But luckily the young mind (I was 15) is pretty malleable and I was able to figure a way out of it.

      Because these panic attacks happened only once every couple of days, I focused on the time between the attacks. The attacks were precipitated by a fear that they were going to happen, so if I got myself into the wrong frame of mind, and allowed myself to start to panic (a sort of aura would come over my mind as the panic started, like I could feel it descending on me), and if I didn't act quickly to distract myself, there was no hope of getting out of it. So I decided to stop fighting it and just "let it happen", sort of convincing myself that "I survived the last one so I can survive this one". And it helped immensely to realize that even if it did keep happening, it wouldn't kill me (unless I killed myself!), and I would have a couple of days to live relatively normally again. I focused on feeling like it didn't matter that I would panic, like it was something to just get over with and move back on with normal life, and once I was able to convince myself of that, I had a tool to take the edge off of the panic once it started happening. And that was enough to often times prevent the panic attack entirely. And once I could prevent a panic attack once in a while, I gained confidence because I thought "well not only do these panic attacks not matter, they are actually preventable". And once I started gaining that confidence, it became easier and easier to avoid them.

      Just as the feedback loop of fear was causing the panic attacks, a feedback loop of confidence (where the confidence caused more confidence because the confidence itself was the tool for preventing the panic attacks) was the solution. Eventually I stopped having the attacks. I did relapse a couple of times throughout my teen years, but only briefly. I also had some months-long duration of minor depression, which I attribute to my brain having to devote so many "feel good" neurons to preventing the attacks, and having less left over to keep my general happiness at a normal level. But by the time I went to college, I was for all intents and purposes over it completely.

      I am 35 now and haven't had a panic attack in 10 years or so. Although it does make me a little nervous to talk about in depth, even writing this felt a little like skirting the edge of fear. But I have no doubt that once I move onto the next Slashdot article I will have relaxed my nerves entirely.

    12. Re:I can see the benefits to this technology by thrawn_aj · · Score: 2, Funny

      Memory eraser??? ---> http://www.std.com/~mica/mib.jpg

  2. I have money by bensafrickingenius · · Score: 3, Funny

    How much would it cost to erase my last 15 years?

    --
    I am not left-handed, either!
    1. Re:I have money by jollyreaper · · Score: 4, Funny

      How much would it cost to erase my last 15 years? Probably about as much as the divorce. Unfortunately, your ass will still hurt from the reaming and you won't know why.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  3. More like RAM than a hard drive then? by moderatorrater · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So this is more like RAM, where it has to have constant power, than it is a hard drive where the bits stay flipped until reversed by something else?

  4. tag: paycheck by Reverend528 · · Score: 2, Interesting
  5. I could have told them about this by been42 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The process is much more dynamic, involving a miniature molecular machine that must run constantly to keep memories going. Jamming the machine briefly can erase long-term memories.

    Not sure what kind of research these scientists have been doing, but I routinely "jam the machine" with whiskey.

  6. I tried, it. It works. by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 4, Funny

    For some reason I can't recall why I got married with this beautiful blonde, and why I keep dreaming about going to Mars with a brunette. Or am I just going crazy?

    - Douglas Quaid.

  7. They actually discovered this years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    But they forgot to write it down before trying it out.

  8. Ive seen this its awesome by sentientbeing · · Score: 2, Funny

    I used this jamming machine once and it was ideal for erasing my short term memories.

    Its also perfect for erasing short term memories, and it also erases short term memories.

    --

    ------
    beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his mind he dreams himself your master
  9. new-fangled inventions by jollyreaper · · Score: 4, Funny

    I still prefer tequila.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  10. So where was this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...when Battlefield Earth was released?

  11. So... by Alioth · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So - more like DRAM (which not only needs to be kept powered, but also kept refreshed) than SRAM or ROM then.

    I get the feeling that memory is a bit like a set of linked lists. If the head node in the list gets mislaid, then the memory might all still be there - but you can't get to it, at least not easily. I've noticed on many occasions I've tried to recall something - I know I know it, but I can't actually access the memory. Then several days later, the thing I was trying to recall will pop into my consciousness, a bit like a background "find / -name something" had been executing all along.

    Funnily enough we were just discussing memory on IRC - how if we were playing a piece of classical music on the piano from memory, one bad note and all of a sudden you couldn't continue from where you were without going all the way back to the start, almost like losing the next node in the linked list.

  12. If true, then cryonics are effectively useless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As if ice crystals smashing every cell to pulp weren't enough, now even if the damage could be repaired there would be no personality left after a cryonic resuscitation.

  13. This science is a two edged sword. by CodeShark · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I just read the article -- and am singularly unimpressed. They trained rats to avoid some tests, then inject drugs into the area where taste memory is stored, and poof, the taste aversion training seems to be kaput.

    in rats...

    I've got a simpler experiment. Try using a little ethyl alcohol on a brain circuit (you know, the stuff in beer, whiskey, etc.?) and if you get enough in the right place, no long term memory is formed because the brain is asleep. So a person wouldn't develop an aversion to something that happened while they were blacked out in terms of memory but still conscious otherwise.

    But governmental experimenters can't force you to drink to destabilizwe your memories, and because -- to my knowledge most of our useful memories are stored in multiple areas of the brain and integrated by consciousness -- I'm not sure that the availability of a drug that can chemically destabilize memory is a good thing.

    Prosecutor: What did you see?
    Witness: I ....don't remember...

    Get the picture?

    Hello!! basic neuroanatomy 101: impulses are transmitted by electrochemical means and interpreted by electrochemical means, and presumably stored by changes brought about by electrochemical means. So if they flooded a little chunk of your brain with a neurococktail that fuzzed up the cellular chemistry that caused a change, it stands to reason that the change wouldn't remain stable.

    --
    ...Open Source isn't the only answer -- but it's almost always a better value than the alternatives...
    1. Re:This science is a two edged sword. by OG · · Score: 3, Interesting

      First off, you're comparing memory retention to memory formation, two very different processes. From a research point-of-view, their finding is quite significant (and IAANeuroscientist, with my area being electrophysiological studies of memory systems and how they are impaired by alcohol). Specifically, they've identified a protein that seems to be essential for the long-term maintenance of memories in cortex.

      As a mentioned elsewhere, this finding probably won't help much therapeutically, as it is too far-reaching. What's really needed for treatment of memory-based pathologies is something that erases a memory (or prevents a memory from being restored) when it is accessed so that you can target specific memories, and there's evidence that it might be feasible.

  14. Juggling by umbrellasd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So your memories are a function of how many molecules you can juggle. But you are more than your memories. Even if I couldn't remember things that happened to me beyond a day ago, I would still have opinions and feelings about situations that occur each day. I wouldn't have specific memories to tie to current events, but I would still avoid some situations and be drawn to others.

    Which leads me to wonder, where that "you" is stored and if that storage is "permanent" or easily disrupted. Is my knowledge of mathematics a "memory"? What about my general disposition? Can someone make me drop the "Don't murder people" ball and disrupt my a moral imperatives? That one happens pretty often, actually.

    There's no permanence. Just an ever-changing approximation of whatever you envision yourself to be.
  15. On the plus side... by GBC · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...if Slashdot's Editors work this one out, none of us will "remember" to tag stories as dupes.

  16. Couple of Health thoughts from article by Fox_1 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Addiction and Memory - is it possible to forget and addiction? Like a hit of Heroin that you don't remember doing? or would your body still have a physiological need for the drug?

    If memory is (as the article says):
    In other words, long-term memory is not a one-time inscription on the nerve network, but an ongoing process which the brain must continuously fuel and maintain
    Crazy idea, the memories I've trusted as being relatively permanent are actually only a few weeks old, or months, but much younger then the experiences they describe -at a molecular level. It's clear that we have limited conscious control over them, bad memories affect people in a number of documented ways. However ignoring the content the memories are just molecules that we can monkey with. My question is: How many other parts or functions in our body are not permanent but maintained with similar molecular functions - scar tissue? Health issues? Just as the body maintains memories, good or bad, does it maintain other things good or bad? Can the body forget to be sick? forget to be Crazy? Could we 'forget' cancer - (molecularly give the cues for the cells not to reproduce or be maintained) -and I know "cure for cancer" is crazy talk - however I love the idea of hacking the molecular mechanisms of the body in a way more clever then massive powersurges of cell destroying drugs and radiation.

    --
    The rock, the vulture, and the chain
  17. Rat-brained assumptions by E++99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The underlying assumption that these effects have some significant correlation to long-term memory in humans is questionable. Rats are fantastic for testing physiological responses to drugs, as most the involved systems operate similarly. Low level CNS stuff, which may be involved here, is good too. But things touching on consciousness -- like conscious memory, as opposed to conditioned reactions, should not be assumed to have any correlation to experiments like these.

  18. I'm sure they thought of this by RealProgrammer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    but their logic doesn't show. It could be that the protein they administered just wiped out all memory of a certain type.

    To test whether the memory needs regular update (their "little machine" metaphor), they need to show that their protein doesn't harm existing memories, which is the opposite of what their experiment showed.

    What am I missing (besides the years 1981-2)?

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
  19. Where do I sign up? by phalse+phace · · Score: 4, Funny

    I need someone to wipe out the images of goatse.cx and tub girl from my memory

    *shivers*

  20. Wow, Star Wars fans will be lining up by Jim+in+Buffalo · · Score: 4, Funny

    You'll have Star Wars fans lining up to have their memories of the prequel trilogy permanently expunged.

    --
    This sig, aah-ah, is comin' like a ghost-sig...
    1. Re:Wow, Star Wars fans will be lining up by pboyd2004 · · Score: 2, Funny

      The problem with that is you end up in a endless loop:

      10 WATCH STAR WARS 1
      20 WATCH STAR WARS 2
      30 WATCH STAR WARS 3
      40 GET MEMORIES OF JARJAR ERASED
      50 GET MEMORIES OF HAYDEN CHRISTENSEN'S ACTING ERASED
      60 GOTO 10

  21. Made mandatory by the *IAA ! by Ihlosi · · Score: 3, Funny

    You memory contains illegal copies (aka memories) of their stuff. This will put an end to your illegal behavior.

  22. Who are you to say that? by spun · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Are you a psychologist? Do you know about current treatments and their success rates? Furthermore, who are you to say that we don't want others buying a treatment that might help relieve their suffering? Some types of trauma can not be 'accepted and coped with.'

    What a load of authoritarian claptrap. You sound like the type of person who has had some small measure of success dealing with their own minor past hurts and now has THE ONE TRUE ANSWER for every human being on the planet. Good luck with that.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  23. In fairness... by Etherwalk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I didn't read the post you're responding to, but why should a man need to be a psychologist to talk about the mind? No one's asking him for therapy.

    *glances at post in question*

    Okay, so he could be a lot more tactful, or could use... well, could explain any reasoning he's using there. But still, more flies with honey.

    A degree isn't everything.

  24. Chilled Brains Retain Memory - Mod Parent Up by mrcaseyj · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Since brains chilled to inactivity during surgery maintain their memories and function, I'd say this dynamic memory theory is questionable. Maybe the old memories are being overwritten or maybe the pathway to access them is being scrambled. Also human brains may store memory quite differently than rats.


    The fact that human brains chilled to inactivity maintain their memory, also hints that frozen brains may very well be recoverable in the future. It's said to be an old myth that freezing brains causes ice crystals to shred the brain cells.

  25. DRAM by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The brain is like a large organic blob of dynamic ram that works on the principle similar to a feedback loop to keep the data fresh.. You block off any part of it, or overload it, and you lose data.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  26. Imagine the practical applications for world peace by ninejaguar · · Score: 3, Funny
    I wonder if the military is already looking into practical applications of this technology for wide dispersal. Imagine bombs exploding clouds of skin absorbent forget-me-dust over hostile territories (like Republican conventions), or adding barrels of who-am-i solution to water supplies for parched desert inhabitants (the sinners in Vegas?).

    Wow, I'm thinking like a comic-book super-villain!

    = 9J =

  27. overgeneralizing by m2943 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There is no reason to believe that all memories work the same way. Taste and smell aversion, in particular, are so different from other kinds of memories that there's a good chance that they work differently too.

  28. What does this mean for those under cryonics? by Tagged_84 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've been following Alcor for years now, always love reading their news letter informing of new changes and improvements to cryonics and how many people are now under cryostasis. Indeed I am thinking of getting this done, the price is certainly worth it.. But now I worry, if the research is true then would you come out hundreds of years in the future not knowing who you were? Would you come out as if you were a new-born? Learning difficulties wouldn't be a problem in the future due to chip/memory implementations (When they are able to bring back a person from cryostasis, I'm almost certain this tech would be waiting), but having no recollection of who you were brings up a sore spot. Perhaps it's an advantage though? Being that all your friends and family would have been dead for centuries, you wouldn't have that longing of seeing them again!

  29. Why a drug to forget when we can learn? by ganesaraja12 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The protein in question here is PKMzeta, which from the name I'd think is a protein kinase. Apparently it's a fragment of the enzyme Protein Kinase C-zeta, and it is crucial for its constituvely active functioning, which means that it will continuously function.

    As far as I recall, there's heaps of drugs that are capable of interfering with constitutively active phosphorylation so as to inhibit or enhance function. In the case of cancer, drugs that inhibit constitutive phosphorylation ie. the use of imitanib in chronic myeloid leukaemia, have enormous utility. But what about one that enhances such functions? What about having a drug that is capable of engaging with the active site of the enzyme as a means of enhancing its function and form new memories? It'll be decades before such drugs can have clinical use, but their function as academic drugs is huge. From their use, we can learn about:

    1) How long-term memories are formed and destroyed
    2) How physiological and pathological processes influence these
    3) The neurochemical and neuroanatomical basis of memory formation

    And even then, if we wanted to make a useful drug out of this, a drug to remember as opposed to forgetting, it is a matter of molecular pharmacology, which is more up to science than serendipity. Engineering a drug to be an agonist, or antagonist thereof, has some curious applications. I may not be a pharmacologist, but from studying I've found that having a drug that agonizes or antagonizes the enzymatic or receptor machinery is contingent upon having a drug that:

    1) Can fit into the active site(s) of the protein
    2) Stimulate it or inhibit it thereof by altering the chemistry of the enzyme, hence enhancing function

    We have here, a drug that can fit into the active site of this protein. We could quite well re-engineer it to have enhanced activity, or a longer half-life. Heck, if we wanted to, we could synthesize it and inject bucketloads into mice and see if they develop superb long-term memories. Think of the applications as an adjunct therapy for dementia...think about how mutations in this protein could be responsible for the memory savants we see today.

    Of course, we're going out of our depth here. PKM-zeta seems to be well studied in mouse models, I haven't found much info on this in humans.