Slashdot Mirror


Spanish TV Channels Vandalize Wikipedia

strider2004 writes to tell us that Barrapunto, a Spanish tech news site, has outed two TV stations in Spain, one public and the other private, for engaging in Wikipedia vandalism for the sake of a story. (The link is in Spanish; Google translation here.) The public station introduced falsehoods into the Wikipedia entry for John Lennon; the private one vandalized the Elvis Presley entry. Both stations said they were performing an "experiment" to check the reaction time of Wikipedia. Both articles were promptly corrected by other editors.
Update: 08/19 13:01 GMT by KD : Barrapunto is not affiliated with Slashdot.

21 of 182 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Good Ol' Unreliable WikipediaBS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Anyone can change it without anything to back it,{{citation-needed}} generally changed by the whiny commie demoncrat terrorists to spread their communist lies.{{citation-needed}}

  2. Re:Red neck response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Then why do they speak Mexican in Spain?

  3. Re:Red neck response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    for all the idiots: Mexico != Spain

    It is for sufficiently large values of Mexico.

  4. Local FOX News translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    WIKIPEDIA... A free encyclopedia, so free ANYONE can edit it. Are child molesters using it to reach out to YOUR CHILDREN? The answer... coming up later this hour.

    1. Re:Local FOX News translation by msp0 · · Score: 4, Funny

      ... a story no parent can afford to miss ...

  5. Re:So.... by iminplaya · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is news?

    Bueno, fue hecho con una computadora...

    --
    What?
  6. I'm shocked! by Manchot · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't believe this is true! Why did no one tell me that Slashdot has a Spanish version? Seriously, looking at it is like looking at Bizarro Slashdot.

    1. Re:I'm shocked! by Tatisimo · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's no Slashdot! It has no CowboyNeal option on its polls!

      --
      Give Kashyyyk back to the Wookies
    2. Re:I'm shocked! by mjsottile77 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I dunno about that. It's not really authentic Spanish Slashdot until their poll has an option involving "VaqueroNeal".

    3. Re:I'm shocked! by niktemadur · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's no Slashdot! It has no CowboyNeal option on its polls!

      Not to mention the usual witty commentary we've all come to know and love, time and again, but in spanish:

      - Imagínate un enjambre Beowulf de estos!
      - Esa no es una luna, es una estación espacial!
      - En Rusia Soviética, Wikipedia te vandaliza a TI!

      --
      Lil' Thindime, lilting a lacrimose lament, krashes the kwaint konfines of Kokonino Kounty
    4. Re:I'm shocked! by Rocketship+Underpant · · Score: 2, Funny

      Are "las citas obligatorias de los Simpsons" restricted to exclamations by Bumblebee Guy, I wonder?

      Ay, un gato malodoro!

      --
      He who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.
  7. Re:Wait ..... by BinBoy · · Score: 5, Funny

    How on Earth can two television stations be of homosexual leanings?

    Vandalizing wikipedia is gay.

  8. Re:Another Brick In The Wall by vonFinkelstien · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've seen a few of my high schools students editing Wikipedia with bogus info just for kicks.

  9. Terrorists place bombs in Spanish TV offices by MarkByers · · Score: 4, Funny

    "We were just testing to see how fast the emergency services would react..."

    --
    I'll probably be modded down for this...
  10. barrapunto - not just for nerds by boguslinks · · Score: 5, Funny

    Their slogan is not "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters", but "La informacion que te interesa"...

    What does that make them, the spanish Drudge Report?

    1. Re:barrapunto - not just for nerds by UserGoogol · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, their top story is that Netbeans is switching to the GPLv2, whereas Daily Drudge's top story is that HISTORIC HELL STORM SET FOR JAMAICA.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
  11. Re:So.... by cerberusss · · Score: 3, Funny

    Goofballs add bogus info to Wikipedia; said bogus info is promptly corrected. This is news?
    You're *so* right. In 2048, when IPv4 addresses run out and Wikipedia becomes sentient, we'll all have a laugh about it.
    --
    8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
  12. Spanish Ads by AngryJim · · Score: 3, Funny

    clicking on the Barrapunto link, I get an advertisement for something called "Dorkbot Madrid"

    I think it's the first time an advertisement has ever made me want to buy something, particularly when I have no clue what it is.

  13. In the name of science by a9bejo · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Both stations said they were performing an "experiment" to check the reaction time of Wikipedia."

    Maybe someone should perform an "experiment" to test the stability of that TV station's websites.

  14. Re:Good Ol' Unreliable WikipediaBS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Simple demoncrat, look at who cites WikipediaBS as a source. Oh, it is you whiny commie demoncrat terrorists that love Communist Linsux and Open-Sores. It is only you demoncrats that are allowed to change it to suit your agenda in turning America into yet another failed socialist experiment.

  15. Re:Wait ..... by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Vandalizing wikipedia is gay.

    Properly vandalizing wikipedia would be. But these TV stations are just wannabees!

    If you want your vandalism to stick, become smarter. Either pick lesser known subjects (John Lennon and Elvis Presley are just too high-profile: these are well-watched, and anyting funny will be corrected within minutes). Or, if you absolutely must pick well-known subjects, at leas be smarter about it:

    One way would be to make more than one change, using more than one username (I hope you made one of these? "Anonymous IP" edits are just too easy to spot, and raise too many red flags).

    • use first username to add vandalismus and lots of expletives to article.
    • use second username to "helpfully" revert the expletives, but sneakily leave the vandalism in place...
    Most editors won't see through this.

    Ok, ok, for the first edit you may actually use an IP (but, pleae use a proxy!) to make it look more real.

    Oh, and for the helpful username, be sure to fill in your user page and your user talk page, to make sure that the link won't show up red, which is another tell-tale sign that something might be up.

    Also, another way of successfully vandalizing a page is to add funny but true stuff. As the stuff is true, nobody will dare to revert it, so it'll stay in place forever, leaving lot of people to wonder why the heck "butcher's son" is such an important phrase that it is mentioned in a phrase list of a language's wikipedia page.

    Or usurp a well-known contributor's username, by using letter look-alikes. For instance, in many fonts, the sequence rn looks surprisingly similar to m. Use it to your advantage!

    Other fun stunts involve images:

    • overwrite images linked from an article: such operations won't show up on the changelog of the article, so watcher's won't see it
    • upload new images which have hidden meanings, or are animated (for example, snap a picture of a baggy of walnuts, upload it as nutsack.gif. Most editors won't notice that it changes into something a tad more graphic after waiting one minute)