Slashdot Mirror


Evanescent Lasers to Speed Up Data Transmission

Roland Piquepaille writes "Researchers at UC Santa Barbara (UCSB) have built the world's first mode-locked silicon evanescent laser. But what is an 'evanescent' laser? It is a step toward 'combining lasers and other key optical components with the existing electronic capabilities in silicon.' In other words, this research work will provide a way to integrate optical and electronic functions on a single chip. As these evanescent lasers can produce stable short pulses of laser light, they will be useful for many optical applications, such as high-speed data transmission or highly accurate optical clocks."

82 comments

  1. Is it just me by JayTech · · Score: 1, Funny

    Or did I not read "effervescent" on first glance? Just think, and Alka-Seltzer powered laser! Technology has come a long way... medicine for today's grandparents is tomorrow's high-tech CD-ROM.

    1. Re:Is it just me by modecx · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hey, that's a great idea. I sure know I could use an effervescent laser after downing a big smothered beef and bean burrito with extra beans. This'll be the best invention since, well, smothered beef and bean burritos!

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    2. Re:Is it just me by MarkovianChained · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, I first read "evanescence" -- the only laser featuring Amy Lee.

    3. Re:Is it just me by MrNaz · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yea I read effervescent as well. For a moment I thought the article was about researchers who had managed to genetically engineer sharks to live in soda.

      --
      I hate printers.
    4. Re:Is it just me by sjaguar · · Score: 1

      Nope. I saw the same thing. I was trying to think how bubbles and lasers would interact. Then I got sidetracked by trying to pop bubbles with my green laser pointer and never ended up reading the article.

      --
      If at first you don't succeed, call it version 1.0.
  2. evanescent laser? by Cassius+Corodes · · Score: 5, Funny

    evanescent laser? Does it imbue people with emo powers?

    --
    Control is an illusion, order our comforting lie. From chaos, through chaos, into chaos we fly
    1. Re:evanescent laser? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh. If I had mod points, etc.

  3. I guess this answers the question by The+Orange+Mage · · Score: 3, Funny

    of how they can see into that annoying womans' eyes like open doors.

    With freakin' lasers.

    Also, cue the shark comments!

  4. Interesting... by Arceliar · · Score: 1

    ...but can they run linux?

    Okay, probably not (yet). But I'm actually serious about that. Aside from the awesomeness that would be seeing tux on the boot screen of a photonic device, there's the sheer awesomeness that is just running a computer on (mostly) lasers instead of electricity. Even if it's still a long ways off.

    And lets not forget how much power it could theoretically save, what with not having to deal with resistance (not that light doesn't have its own problems, ie refraction and diffraction, both big deals when working on small scales).

    1. Re:Interesting... by techno-vampire · · Score: 1
      ...there's the sheer awesomeness that is just running a computer on (mostly) lasers instead of electricity.


      What do you think powers the lasers?

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    2. Re:Interesting... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A turtle. Turtles, all the way down, man.

      What bothers me, though, isn't the lasers, it's that this is the second Roland story in less than 24 hours. That Roland must have some amazing oral skills.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    3. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aside from the awesomeness that would be seeing tux on the boot screen of a photonic device, I'll save the slightly funny yet cutting remarks that point out what a tool you are and instead keep it short and get to the point by saying....

      Get off my planet.

    4. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the frikkin' sharks!

    5. Re:Interesting... by BladeMelbourne · · Score: 2, Informative

      Roland gets financially compensated for his spam. Always has...

    6. Re:Interesting... by AbbyNormal · · Score: 1

      He is a Gun Slinger though. (Dark Tower Fans?)

      --
      Sig it.
    7. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, I must admit I'm not too thrilled with Roland myself. But the thing is, they probably wouldn't approve his links if they were not good links. I have no idea how many stories have been submitted about this same item, but it is possible that Roland's are the "best" of the bunch - because he shows he has actually read the article, the summary is well-written and the story is "news for nerds". Try matching all of these, and maybe you will get repeated accepted stories as well.

    8. Re:Interesting... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      OK, I must admit I'm not too thrilled with Roland myself. But the thing is, they probably wouldn't approve his links if they were not good links. I have no idea how many stories have been submitted about this same item, but it is possible that Roland's are the "best" of the bunch - because he shows he has actually read the article, the summary is well-written and the story is "news for nerds". Try matching all of these, and maybe you will get repeated accepted stories as well. First of all, given the "editorial" policies here, I highly doubt that good writing enters into it. The reason I'm busting the editors' nuts, though, is that they could at least have the decency to let 24 hours elapse before posting another Roland story. It's almost getting to the point where they might as well just redirect slashdot to Roland's site.
      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  5. Uses by Zatchmort · · Score: 5, Funny

    a hightly accurate optical clock What, you mean, like, looking at the sun??
    1. Re:Uses by RuBLed · · Score: 1

      But now you can, even at night!

  6. Evanescence laser? Bah! by Gizzmonic · · Score: 0, Troll

    Modern lasers are crap. Now that AC/DC laser, that's the shit that rocks!

    --
    (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
  7. so its like the band after all by grapeape · · Score: 2, Funny

    Its been consolidated to one member?

    1. Re:so its like the band after all by maroberts · · Score: 1

      I was wondering whether an Evanescant laser acted as a carrier for alternative rock

      --

      Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
      Karma: Chameleon

  8. Evanescent by AJWM · · Score: 3, Informative

    "Wail, wail, wail. Evanescent Ladle Rat Rotten Hut", set disk wicket woof.

    --
    -- Alastair
    1. Re:Evanescent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm so glad I'm not the only person who read it as "if it isn't lasers to speed up data transmission!"

  9. I, for one... by greenguy · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...welcome our heaven-sent lasers.

    And you will, too, if you know what's good for you.

    --
    What if I do the same thing, and I do get different results?
  10. Re:Evanescence laser? Bah! by karnal · · Score: 0, Redundant

    For some reason, "For Those About To Rock... LASE!" didn't have the right "ring" to it.

    --
    Karnal
  11. No on-topic comments yet. . . by treeves · · Score: 3, Funny

    . . .and I'm not helping: I won a spelling bee by spelling "evanescent" correctly in seventh or eighth grade. I didn't know what it meant 'til later, but I figured out how to spell it.

    --
    ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    1. Re:No on-topic comments yet. . . by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Funny

      . . .and I'm not helping: I won a spelling bee by spelling "evanescent" correctly in seventh or eighth grade

      A moose bit my sister once. :-P
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  12. Incredible!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Students at UC Santa Barbara actually did something academic! Will wonders never cease?

    1. Re:Incredible!!! by LACMA · · Score: 1

      Coincidentally enough, my neighbors here at UCSB aren't partying for the first time in several weeks. Perhaps this is part of a trend?

    2. Re:Incredible!!! by bariswheel · · Score: 1

      So, to straighten some of the anonymous cowards out a bit.

      UCSB is labeled a party school mainly due to the insane town next door that is Isla Vista, of which the majority of the population are actually community college students in the city, but prefer to live by the beach, hence they live right next to the uni. This misrepresents the university and continues to degrade its reputation. Yes, I am an alumni, and yes, you've struck a small chord on the proverbial nerve, but it's ok.

      The university has produced more nobel laureates than any university in the last 7 years. UCSB is what Berkeley was 30 years ago, but reputation takes a while to build, so in 20 years or so, you'll be hearing about UCSB the way you hear about Berkeley, UCLA, etc..

      The University's materials science program, I believe is the best in the world; and its Particle Physics (Kavli Institute of Theoretical Physics) is worldly renowned. Stephen Hawking makes regular visits, and I've had the honor and privilege to meet him here.

      UCSB also harbors a nanofabrication cleanroom facility, at the Kavli Institute of Nanoscience. Before I left the area more than a year ago, the research going on at the Kavli Institute as well as these cleanroom facilities was disturbingly fascinating, you can find out more info if you wish.

      http://www.nanotech.ucsb.edu/

      A lot of Googlers are also from UC Santa Barbara, including the Senior VP of Operations, Urs Hoelzle, who taught CS at the College of Engineering.

      http://www.google.com/corporate/execs.html#urs

      I also work at Google.

      I hope I was able to provide relevant/useful information for you all.

      Cheers,

      --
      Insinct is stronger than Upbringing - Irish Proverb
    3. Re:Incredible!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be new here.

    4. Re:Incredible!!! by crgrace · · Score: 1

      I attended UCSB for a while as well, but did not get a degree there. I went somewhere else.

      I would say that the majority of wild Isla Vista residents are in fact UCSB students. There are many Santa Barbara City College students there, but all the people in my apt building were UCSB. Also, there are a lot of Mexican laborers in the town.

      The Engineering and Materials science departments are outstanding. But it is a large university and there is a lot of party people. It is a fact. UCSB has the largest percentage of white students in the UC system. That is also a fact.

      The ECE department is universally regarded as excellent and myopic... all they care about is compound semiconductors. We can thank Nobel Laureate Herbert Kroemer for that.

      I agree with you that UCSB is a wonderful school. But the fact is there are a lot of 24 hour party people as undergraduates. Denying that does not improve the reputation of the science there.

  13. Re:Evanescence laser? Bah! by ajlitt · · Score: 1, Funny

    For those about to undergo population inversion... We salute you!

  14. well, by Verte · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I remember reading some of the patents they got for this a few months ago. I'm pretty sure we've talked about this before, too. That's not to say I'm any less excited- when we start to see this technology applied to inter-core busses, we'll see latency drop low enough to integrate a bucketload of cores on a single die.

    --
    We at slashdot are scientists, specialists and kernel hackers. Your FUD will be found out.
    1. Re:well, by SnowZero · · Score: 1

      True, but right now any real applications are still vaporware, or as I like to say, imaginary light.

    2. Re:well, by Hal-9001 · · Score: 1

      True, but right now any real applications are still vaporware, or as I like to say, imaginary light.
      Ironically, the word "evanescent" is used in optics to describe imaginary light (i.e. light where the imaginary component of the wavevector is nonzero).
      --
      "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
  15. intel, I mean by Verte · · Score: 5, Informative

    and here is the site for their research: http://techresearch.intel.com/articles/Tera-Scale/ 1419.htm

    --
    We at slashdot are scientists, specialists and kernel hackers. Your FUD will be found out.
    1. Re:intel, I mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      man, you just riuned the dream of a not-single-interesting-post in an article at slashdot :(

  16. Black lasers... by Blittzed · · Score: 1

    Evanescent lasers - Goths with Fricken Laser beams atached to their heads? Or lasers which cause the targets to dress in black and mope around the place...

    --
    "They looked deep into my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined"
  17. Re:Slashdot by The+Anarchist+Avenge · · Score: 3, Funny

    The least you could do would be to attribute this to http://www.xkcd.com/

    --
    Today's lucky number is: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  18. What kind of laser? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait, lasers coming from Amy Lee can speed up data transmission?

    Does this mean that my files are going to be sung to me?

    1. Re:What kind of laser? by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

      They sped the rest of the band on their way, why not data?

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
  19. Optical clock .. glass clock. by arcade · · Score: 2

    I guess the auditors are cheering!

    --
    "Rune Kristian Viken" - http://www.nwo.no - arca
    1. Re:Optical clock .. glass clock. by Watson+Ladd · · Score: 1

      Where's the giant storm?

      --
      Inventions have long since reached their limit, and I see no hope for further development.-- Frontinus, 1st cent. AD
    2. Re:Optical clock .. glass clock. by cramoft · · Score: 1

      "I guess the auditors are cheering!"

              Are you sure the auditors would know what to do with an expotential loss...????

  20. Re:Roland Piquepaille by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you considered a career in motivational speaking?

  21. It's not really a silicon laser by Hal-9001 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    According to TFA, the stimulated emission of light actually takes place in an indium phosphide (InP) laser diode. The laser diode is bonded to a silicon waveguide, which acts like a miniature optical fiber to guide the laser light around the chip. The "evanescence" is because the laser light is evanescently coupled from the laser diode into the waveguide. A proper description of evanescent coupling requires a pretty sophisticated understanding of electromagnetism, but the short version is that if you shine a laser beam parallel and adjacent (within a few microns) of a waveguide or optical fiber, some of the laser light will hop over and start propagating down the waveguide or fiber. In particular, by placing the actual laser parallel to and near a carefully-designed waveguide, you can have almost all of the laser light emitted into the waveguide, even though the constituent atoms of the waveguide are not emitting any light at all! For this reason, I think the name "silicon evanescent laser" is misleading since the silicon isn't emitting any light, and Roland Piquepaille's description of evanescent lasers is just flat out wrong. Getting silicon to emit light remains an extremely difficult task, and as far I know, no one has succeeded yet in getting silicon to convert electricity directly into laser light.

    If anyone wants to read the Optics Express paper referenced in TFA, it's available online at http://www.opticsexpress.org/abstract.cfm?id=14097 3. However, that paper doesn't really define the term "evanescent laser" anywhere, so I had to go back to one of the research group's earlier papers to find a decent description of an evanescent laser and understand the physics of the device.

    --
    "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
    1. Re:It's not really a silicon laser by LeadSongDog · · Score: 1

      Wikipedia speaks to Evanescent wave coupling. For the dino's amongst us, it's just the optical analog of an RF transformer. It only works in the near field (usually magnetic, although electric could also be done.) So these guys have implemented a PLL in new technology. La plus ca change....

      --
      Oh, I'm sorry sir, I thought you were referring to me, Mr. Wensleydale.
    2. Re:It's not really a silicon laser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > and as far I know, no one has succeeded yet in getting silicon to convert electricity directly into laser light.

      Does this count?
      http://www.nature.com/nphoton/journal/v1/n4/full/n photon.2007.29.html

    3. Re:It's not really a silicon laser by Hal-9001 · · Score: 1

      and as far I know, no one has succeeded yet in getting silicon to convert electricity directly into laser light.
      Does this count?
      http://www.nature.com/nphoton/journal/v1/n4/full/n photon.2007.29.html
      A Raman laser works by converting preexisting laser light of one color into laser light of another color, so no, it does not count.
      --
      "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
    4. Re:It's not really a silicon laser by Agripa · · Score: 1

      I was actually thinking along the lines of a directional coupler but of course that is just a specialized RF transformer.

    5. Re:It's not really a silicon laser by fractoid · · Score: 1

      You mean to say that Ramen lasers don't work by converting a powder and a dried noodle cake into a delicious snack, which then powers a geek who invents frikkin' lasers?

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
  22. I wonder how long by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 1

    Until we decide to just get it over with and switch to a direct-bandgap semiconductor. Probably as soon as they figure out how to make a decent P-type fet on GaAs...

    1. Re:I wonder how long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed that would be a solution, but the point is that the infrastructure for silicon processing is already there. When you have to switch to GaAs products, you have to change all of the cleanrooms and equipment used to make the products. This is currently seen as being a much more expensive solution. What we're trying to show is that you can do optoelectronic functions using this hybrid platform just as well as (or at least almost as well as) you could on pure GaAs or InP, but now you can integrate that on the same chip as all of the inexpensive silicon electronics (and passive optics). Additionally, we're learning that there may even be some other advantages to this hybrid platform aside from just being a cheaper solution.
      Sincerely,
      Brian Koch (author of the paper)

  23. Re:mod Down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would mod you down but I don't see a "-1, makes no sense" option. However, since there is the word "energy" in your post you could be on topic, so... umm, I guess I agree with you, especially on the software part.

  24. Re:File this next to the fusion folder by somersault · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have a cunning plan to achieve all three of these goals in one fell swoop. All I will need, is a toothpick, some weapons grade plutonium, and roughly 5 billion billion billion USD.

    --
    which is totally what she said
  25. Re:leads to faster comps too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    We need a new negative mod category, "stupidly contrived use of a meme that was never funny to begin with".

  26. Dang mental image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm picturing Amy Lee with a frickin' laser on her forehead.

    1. Re:Dang mental image by martin_henry · · Score: 0

      what else is she wearing?

      --
      www.purevolume.com/martyd
  27. They gave Amy Lee a laser? by jpellino · · Score: 1

    I'm confused.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    1. Re:They gave Amy Lee a laser? by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      They gave Amy Lee a laser? Yes, of course... to vaporize (or rather, to evanesce) any remaining band members
      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
  28. That Roland must have some amazing oral skills.... by Chineseyes · · Score: 1

    "That Roland must have some amazing oral skills

    Now the question is who did he have to suck to get two articles on the front page so quickly.

    CmdrTaco?
    CowboyNeal?

    Now that would make for an interesting poll.

    --
    I think the invisible hand of the market has its middle finger extended

    --A wise old fart named SC0RN
  29. Re:That Roland must have some amazing oral skills. by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure that Malda has a vagina and not a penis, so it would be licking and not sucking in his case. How do you think he got the nickname "CmdrTaco"?

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  30. Re:Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or more to the point, this particular one http://www.xkcd.com/301/

  31. Re:leads to faster comps too by clayanderson · · Score: 2, Funny

    Stop it. Just stop it. It's not funny. It only has a remote chance of being funny if you do something clever with it. Which you didn't. Remotely. So if you can't be funny nor insightful, then just read the article and keep your finger off the submit button.

  32. Look closer by I7D · · Score: 1

    Everybody keeps reading the word Evanescent as something else. Hopefully this tech will be used to make better contact lenses.

    --
    Neil is that you? Yeah yeah, it's me... Neil...
  33. Piece of crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone can stick monitors together with black seams between. This display is useless. There are companies out there doing this with seamless blending between projectors etc. UCSD should be embarrassed by this and the claims made.

  34. Thanks. That (+ wiki) tells why it's "evanescent" by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    I was wondering what this "evanescent laser" bit was about. That article clarifies it.

    Light confined to a waveguide by total internal reflection actually penetrates about a third of a wavelength into the space around it. (Essentially "sampling" the space to "find out" that the refractive index is too low for it to fly away. B-) ) A number of things can be done with this effect (such as measuring the refractive index of opaque substances like ketchup).

    In this case what they've done is build an optic waveguide in silicion (by etching it and perhaps then oxidizing it into glass) and bonded to it an LED with the active region over the waveguide.

      - The evanescent wave penetrates into the region where the diode amplifies light, which provides the gain, pumping up the light in the waveguide.
      - The waveguide provides the resonant cavity for the laser, as well as all the optical plumbing.
      - The waveguide (and all associated optical plumbing) can be easily and accurately constructed using integrated circuit etching techniques.
      - There is no critical alignment between the diode and the waveguide. Just get it within a range of positions that put an active region on top of the waveguide for about the correct length in the correct segment.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  35. Re:File this next to the fusion folder by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

    I think you mean cold fusion, don't you? Fusion of hydrogen is pretty well established. Well, for that matter, usable terrestrial power plants using fusion seem to be in this file for now, too. But in stars, we're pretty sure it works.

  36. Who cares? by pavon · · Score: 1

    I didn't like it when he was submitting stories that only contained a link to his (ad-supported) blog, but all his recent articles have had links to the original source as well, and this one didn't even link to his blog at all. In addition slashdot added the no-follow tag to the submitter link (the one on his name).

    So, he isn't getting ad-revenue, or even a search engine advantage from this article and he submits interesting stories. What's the problem? How is that any different from any other slashdot submitter?

  37. Sounds nifty but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's still no match for a good blaster at your side, kid.

  38. All of what you said is true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and none of it matters now that Slashdot has decided to hate Roland.

    Slashdot is turning into 4chan. Never forgive, never forget, blah, blah, blah, suck my cock you fucking loli addicts.