Slashdot Mirror


Legal Music Streaming Site Launches In France

An anonymous reader writes "The French website Deezer.com has struck a deal with the SACEM (the French equivalent to the RIAA) and is now legally providing Internet users around the world with more than 100,000 full songs, streamed on demand and without restrictions. The site, formerly named Blogmuzik.net, had had to close down last March under pressure from the recording industry."

161 comments

  1. it's cool i've tried it by wizardforce · · Score: 3, Informative

    no more of that 30 second preview nonsense- listen to the song if you like it you add it- no restrictions on the number of songs/artist like finetune either. hmmm guess the RIAA can't do shit about it now can they?

    --
    Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    1. Re:it's cool i've tried it by garcia · · Score: 5, Informative

      no more of that 30 second preview nonsense- listen to the song if you like it you add it- no restrictions on the number of songs/artist like finetune either. hmmm guess the RIAA can't do shit about it now can they?

      I tried a couple of albums at work late last week and then at home on Friday morning. Both connections (work routinely allows for 3MB/s from Apple -- just for reference and I have a 4200/500 DSL connection at home) were laggy with the music frequently pausing during the stream. I felt like I was using RealAudio back in 1999.

      I wasn't impressed at all. My co-workers all use free.napster.com which works much better. YMMV.

    2. Re:it's cool i've tried it by Llian · · Score: 2, Informative

      Its a lovely idea. So lovely they decided it's too good to be allowed decent sound quality. Its no wonder they have the agreement allowing the tracks to be free, they couldn't pay people to listen to this crap quality.

    3. Re:it's cool i've tried it by skeeto · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Except it requires Flash to use it. Looks like you can't access this music using only free software. :-(

    4. Re:it's cool i've tried it by wizardforce · · Score: 2, Insightful

      pandora? flash. finetune? flash. what online music station that you know of doesnt use flash? for that matter, how many websites are there that you can't really use without flash? it would be nice if websites were a bit more open-source friendly but for now either we put up with it or advance our own flash replacement.

      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    5. Re:it's cool i've tried it by skeeto · · Score: 3, Informative

      Radio Paradise is an internet radio station that works well with free software. I listen/streamrip using VLC. The only thing I don't like is the lack of an Ogg Vorbis stream (or some other free codec) :-P.

    6. Re:it's cool i've tried it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      He means free as in hairy naked hippies frolicking across the meadow, not free as in stealing a Faberge egg from a museum by executing an implausibly complex plan involving a variety of non-existent high-tech gadgets.

    7. Re:it's cool i've tried it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both connections (work routinely allows for 3MB/s from Apple -- just for reference and I have a 4200/500 DSL connection at home) were laggy with the music frequently pausing during the stream. I felt like I was using RealAudio back in 1999.

      perchance it has to do with you being in the US and the site, you know ... in France??? I mean, I often get 8MB/s over Internet2 myself[*], but that's hardly relevant to the latency that I'll have accessing a server over in the old world.

      [*] one of the advantages of picking a fast .edu mirror for distro updates

      --
      captcha: transfer. No, really.

    8. Re:it's cool i've tried it by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      The selection is skewed in a way I can't figure out. It is lacking a lot of current popular music. However, I am not sure that is a bad thing... :) But it is also lacking some older stuff. Lets hope it grows.

    9. Re:it's cool i've tried it by shmlco · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "He means free as in hairy naked hippies frolicking across the meadow..."

      You'll notice that you hardly ever see that anymore. Mostly because they finally had to get jobs and live in the real world...

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    10. Re:it's cool i've tried it by tomz16 · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should figure out what LATENCY is before posting about it. Latency would have nothing to do with the GP's music cutting out, lack of bandwidth somewhere along the way would!

      -Tom

      P.S. 8 MB/s over internet2 is nothing to brag about. Hell, it's not even something to really brag about on the plain old internet.

    11. Re:it's cool i've tried it by Technician · · Score: 3, Insightful

      with the music frequently pausing during the stream.

      This is the problem with the internet bottleneck. There is lots of complaints that BitTorrent is sucking all the bandwidth. A file downloaded can and often is played many times. Think of the internet meltdown if you switched all the BitTorrent downloaders to 100% streaming instead.

      To fit the bandwidth now requires very high lossy streaming formats or a serious boost in bandwidth.

      Welcome back to the days of Buffering............Buffering...........Buffering ..........Buffering........

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    12. Re:it's cool i've tried it by thc69 · · Score: 3, Informative

      SomaFM provides nice streams in various formats that can be played by free software. Lately I've taken to listening on my phone while on the road. If only I could make my phone's media player not timeout every 5 minutes, I could probably cancel my satellite radio subscription...

      --
      Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
    13. Re:it's cool i've tried it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I do believe he means 8 Megabytes per second, not 8 Megabits per second. Indeed, that would be something to brag about with plain old internet (in the US at least)

    14. Re:it's cool i've tried it by springbox · · Score: 2, Informative

      The quality of Deezer is much better than free.napster.com. Not sure about the skipping; it has worked perfectly fine for me.

    15. Re:it's cool i've tried it by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      I noticed an option for uploading MP3s. I didn't try it, though. Maybe I'll transcode some of my favorite module-format songs.

    16. Re:it's cool i've tried it by ericartman · · Score: 1

      Latency? huh? well on my little 250 DSL line using feisty, all worked well and sounded fine, wasn't 7.1 but it was free. Please consider I never listened to Mom, Too many rock concerts and rounds fired, hearing is shot. Huh? Cart

    17. Re:it's cool i've tried it by JoshJ · · Score: 1

      No, it's because Nixon threw them all in jail for using LSD.

    18. Re:it's cool i've tried it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Radio Paradise is an internet radio station that works well with free software. I listen/streamrip using VLC. The only thing I don't like is the lack of an Ogg Vorbis stream (or some other free codec) :-P.


      I second the recommendation for Radio Paradise (RP). It has always worked perfectly for me using an mp3 stream of a bit rate appropriate for the connection from a wide variety of operating systems using a similar variety of media players.

      Right now I am listening to a 16 Kbps RP mp3 stream on 28.8 Kbps dial-up and I am relatively impressed, considering I'm used to listening to their 128kbps stream on 5 Mbps cable.

      Anyway, the point is RP Rocks.
    19. Re:it's cool i've tried it by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      Multicast would solve many things. Video and Audio streams would benefit a lot.

    20. Re:it's cool i've tried it by routerl · · Score: 1

      I was listening to (and, I confess, recording music from) this site, while reading this article. Wonder if Deezer works under Vista...

      --
      Trust me, kids; don't drink and post.
    21. Re:it's cool i've tried it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you talking about??? I can listen here to whole songs. And everything works EXCELLENT. I'm in Europe.

    22. Re:it's cool i've tried it by RobertM1968 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ummm... Flash Player is NOT free for many Operating Systems... it's NON-EXISTANT

      In the Linux and OS/2 world, Gnash and numerous other (non-Adobe) Flash Players have yet to reach the latest release level compatibility with the actual Flash Player. While that isnt always a problem, I am running into more and more sites that check for and require a higher level Flash version (ie: 8 or 9).

      Not everyone runs Windows ya know...

    23. Re:it's cool i've tried it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im sorry. I misread the parent. :)

    24. Re:it's cool i've tried it by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1, Informative

      Flash 9 runs fine on both my laptop (running Xubuntu) and desktop (running Ubuntu).

      Sure, it's not Open Source, but you can't have everything.

    25. Re:it's cool i've tried it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strange. It may depend on your location. Here in the Netherlands, we're all using this site now (as well as last.fm), and we've experienced no problems so far with appr. 6 people streaming music from it. Too bad some of the songs on there are low-quality or otherwise distorted in some way (some play about 3/4 as fast as they should). The interface also could use some work.

    26. Re:it's cool i've tried it by OfficeSupplySamurai · · Score: 2, Informative

      The quality is certainly better on Deezer, although it does vary somewhat.

      While they both use MP3 format, Napster uses only 22 kHz mono 32 kbps MP3's. Deezer on the other hand has some at 22 kHz stereo 64 kbps, but also has some at 44.1 kHz stereo 256 kbps. It even has some VBR with 44.1 kHz stereo and about 240 kbps average.

      My guess would be that while Napster standardizes (undoubtedly reencoding from some high quality original), Deezer just gets an MP3 from the artist and streams it, without messing with bitrates or anything like that.

      The fact that it's still a new service combined with the much greater amount of data per song they have to transmit compared to Napster probably accounts for the difficulty experienced by the grandparent poster.

    27. Re:it's cool i've tried it by zcat_NZ · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't. Sooner or later the MAFIAA will find a way to shut them down and make them surrender (sorry) their logs, at which point you'll find buying the CD doesn't give you the right to upload it to random music sites.

      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
    28. Re:it's cool i've tried it by zcat_NZ · · Score: 1

      Oh.. you said transcode mods.. ignore my previous comment :)

      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
    29. Re:it's cool i've tried it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow, you have a DVD key in your sig, and used the word MAFIAAAAAA. you are just stikcing it to the man on steroids aren't you kiddie?

    30. Re:it's cool i've tried it by dodobh · · Score: 1

      http://schizoid.in/ is one of those. A friend runs it.

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    31. Re:it's cool i've tried it by anticypher · · Score: 5, Informative

      The site is hosted in France, where bandwidth is cheap and plentiful. They are supporting the load just fine over here. Getting traffic from New York to Minnesota is the more likely bottleneck rather than France to NY. OTOH, their servers seem to be completely overloaded under the slashdot effect, I think their massive press push has come back to bury them.

      I suspect that since they just scored this licensing agreement after a long legal struggle under new french obligatory licensing laws, they haven't had time to upgrade their servers or get better load offset architecture in place. Paying lawyers who saved their asses probably is a high priority for them.

      I need to clear up the trollish flamebaiting headline, as the SACEM is nothing like the RIAA. They are the only group that collects royalties for authors and songwriters in France, and by law most of the money collected has to be distributed, despite their legendary corruption and incompetence. The SACEM has been forced to provide licensing to anyone who wants it, and I think Deezer was one of the first test cases for internet distribution. By signing a deal with SACEM, Deezer can now play any and all French artists, and any other country's artists who register with SACEM. This doesn't cover performance royalties, which are separate, all the songs on Deezer are performed by the original author. Since the Wu-Tang Clan (who I just saw on the site to use as an example) has registered with SACEM, ODB and MethodMan will get quarterly or yearly royalty checks directly from SACEM. Bands covering other author's songs can't be played under this agreement, at least according to the French press covering this.

      It remains to be seen if Deezer can make enough to cover the royalties they've negotiated with SACEM. They were really over a legal barrel and if they hadn't signed they risked prison time for piracy. They could be a dotbomb2.0 fizzle, since they haven't dropped all the extraneous vowels from their name.

      the AC

      --
      Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
    32. Re:it's cool i've tried it by Lorkki · · Score: 1

      Multicast would solve many things.

      Possibly so, but the bandwidth impact of on-demand streaming isn't among them.

    33. Re:it's cool i've tried it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      >My co-workers all use free.napster.com which works much better. YMMV.

      American only site, so yes useless to most of the world.

    34. Re:it's cool i've tried it by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'll second (uh, third now, I guess) the recommendation of RP. I rarely hear music I don't like on it, and I've bought a couple of albums recently after hearing tracks played on it. A very nice mix of stuff.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    35. Re:it's cool i've tried it by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked, the Linux version was x86 only. Anyone running Linux on PowerPC, ARM, or SPARC couldn't use it, and anyone using Linux on x86-64 had to jump through hoops.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    36. Re:it's cool i've tried it by muadda · · Score: 1

      > OTOH, their servers seem to be completely overloaded under the slashdot effect

      They are hosted by my ISP (www.free.fr). So I don't have any problem ;-)

  2. We the Free people of the world thank France by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2, Funny

    Merci pour les emissions gratuits, mes amis!

    Information and music just wants to be free.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:We the Free people of the world thank France by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Information and music don't want anything since they aren't alive.. You are the one that wants information and music for free. Just change your sig for the sake of honesty. Maybe.. I'm a freeloader - I want information and music for free!

    2. Re:We the Free people of the world thank France by value_added · · Score: 1

      Merci pour les emissions gratuits, mes amis!

      Je suis fier d'être le premier à déclarer bienvenue à nos nouveaux legal streaming suzerains Français!

      Ok, it could use some work ... ;-)

    3. Re:We the Free people of the world thank France by langelgjm · · Score: 1

      "émissions gratuites", methinks.

      --
      "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
    4. Re:We the Free people of the world thank France by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      not everyone has accents.

      In my day we put the missing letters in and pronounced the words with a Marseilleis accent ...

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    5. Re:We the Free people of the world thank France by cstdenis · · Score: 0

      Music likes being personified.

      --
      1984 was not supposed to be an instruction manual.
    6. Re:We the Free people of the world thank France by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Information and music don't want anything since they aren't alive..

      How do you know? I hear them in my dreams every night, whispering to me, saying:

      One RIAA to Bind them All.
      One RIAA to Mind them.

      You only have to open your mind and let the code flow.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    7. Re:We the Free people of the world thank France by nwbvt · · Score: 1

      Free legal music streaming sites have been for years here in the states, people just don't pay attention to them because they prefer to download songs from services that are somewhat less legal and they go out of business.

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
  3. But...this doesn't make sense! by Sunburnt · · Score: 4, Funny

    Are these the same innovation-stifling, reactionary French I keep seeing on Fox News and in the business press?

    I mean, free music? That REEKS of socialism. I, for one, am enough of a proud American to do whatever the music lobbyists of this greatest country in the world demands of me.

    --
    Tags != Comments, and -1 (Troll) != -1 (I Would Respond Angrily To This Poster So They Must Be Trolling)
  4. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    So err does this mean the RIAA has surrendered to uhm France? Doesn't this rip a hole in the time-space continuum or something?

    1. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a French Revolution!

    2. Re:What? by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Don't be an idiot. Frogs wouldn't know a revolution if it bit them in the ass.
      789

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    3. Re:What? by Kelz · · Score: 1

      Poor 9 :'(

    4. Re:What? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      So, the guy who said the French were revolting was wrong?

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    5. Re:What? by Technician · · Score: 1

      Doesn't this rip a hole in the time-space continuum or something?

      Nope, but the fact they are streaming Beatles songs is an indicator they are using the local copyright laws and not going along with international copyright law which would block Beatles songs until they were officially released for internet distribution.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  5. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  6. 32kbps MP3 by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 3, Informative

    While I am not one of those people who claims to be able to tell the difference between 192kbps and 256kbps MP3s, a sampling rate of 32kbps is obviously degraded even to my aging ears.

    1. Re:32kbps MP3 by rob1980 · · Score: 1

      I noticed this too, but as long as the service is free I don't mind. Maybe at some point they'll let me pay a few bucks a month to listen to a higher-quality stream.

    2. Re:32kbps MP3 by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

      It seems far better than what my laptop speakers can produce, it also seems "good enough" for ear buds plugged into the laptop. I understand your concern, I rip at 256K with the hope of eventually playing through a home stereo system, but for casual access 32K seems just fine.

    3. Re:32kbps MP3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weird... I get perfectly good VBR mp3 files (that I can download using Wireshark to find the URI). It probably depends on the song as people submit their own music files.

      And the streaming is pretty good too, I don't have to wait at all to listen to a song, and it doesn't pause too often. Maybe that's because I'm in France, close to the site.

    4. Re:32kbps MP3 by Durkheim · · Score: 1

      No it's not 32Kbps!
      I was curious too about the quality and found all songs I listened to being encoded in 192kbps. I wonder if songs have different encodings. 32kbps seems a lot too compressed to be even remotely listenable.

    5. Re:32kbps MP3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It certainly seems like the files are all actually grabbed from p2p networks. On the same album there were songs of different sample quality - some great, some really poor. Some albums only have a couple of tracks listed. Reading their forums, some tracks are the wrong speed even and some are glitchy.

    6. Re:32kbps MP3 by cibyr · · Score: 1

      I don't know what rate they use, but listening to their copy of The All-American Rejects - The Last Song it was noticeably worse than listening to my copy in winamp. The bass was muddy and too loud while the guitar and vocals sounded tinny.

      But here's the kicker: my copy isn't FLAC, or high-bitrate MP3, or even 128k MP3. It's an 118k ABR mp3 from /ages/ ago. Not really hard to beat.

      --
      It's not exactly rocket surgery.
    7. Re:32kbps MP3 by McWilde · · Score: 1

      I didn't have my ears sand-blasted with 32kbps audio... I checked their "upload your own music" link yesterday. They advise you to send 192kbps or better. I guess they just stream what has been uploaded without any re-encoding.

      --
      Maybe
    8. Re:32kbps MP3 by Halo1 · · Score: 1

      All songs I have tried were either 44KHz/192Kbps or 22Khz/32Kbps. No idea what the criteria are. Maybe they are in the process of replacing all songs with the same quality (and if that's the case, I guess it won't be 192Kbps...)

      --
      Donate free food here
  7. So where is the money coming from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So how do artists get income through this scheme? Surely they must get something for their efforts... (have not RTFA)

    1. Re:So where is the money coming from? by alxbtk · · Score: 5, Informative

      Our concept is simple:
      -Give consumers a full and free access to all their favourite songs
      -Pay artists and their producers through a revenue share based on our advertising revenues
      - Help discovering new artists through a wide audience

      from the about us page on the site (emphasis mine)

    2. Re:So where is the money coming from? by zcat_NZ · · Score: 1

      Probably much the same way they get income from broadcast radio?

      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
  8. Call me paranoid, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the catch?
    There has to be something in the small print somewhere.

    1. Re:Call me paranoid, but.... by sentientbeing · · Score: 1

      Youre right. Get Ackbar on the horn.
       
      Something smells fishy and its not his feet.

      --

      ------
      beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his mind he dreams himself your master
    2. Re:Call me paranoid, but.... by Skrynkelberg · · Score: 1

      Nope. It's like radio, except from now on you can select the songs you want to hear yourself. Viva la Revolution!

  9. Caesar's to caesar by unity100 · · Score: 0

    The innovation stifling french were the ones who brought modern government method of the republic to the world, starting around with ideas of the likes of voltaire, rousseau and contemporaries. and united states of america, the first country to be founded by those new (and by that time's standards probably very socialist in your understanding) and popular ideals. i bet you would call them 'socialist' and demean them, gratifying the king if you were to live at that era.

    1. Re:Caesar's to caesar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. That Robespierre sure knew how to innovate.

    2. Re:Caesar's to caesar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are also the same ones whos help against the British enabled the American Revolution to suceed. A fact totally lost in the teaching of American histroy within the United States.

    3. Re:Caesar's to caesar by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      A fact totally lost in the teaching of American histroy within the United States. It's skipped over in K-12 education, but is covered in PS101, which was a gen-ed requirement where I got my Associates degree.
    4. Re:Caesar's to caesar by Matteo522 · · Score: 1

      I remember learning about this in 5th grade US History. I went to public school in New Jersey.

    5. Re:Caesar's to caesar by unity100 · · Score: 1

      yes, and there are apparently quite a high number of jerks even at slashdot too, who doesnt know crap about how modern west have emerged, and consequently u.s.. some halfwit modded this thread's parent down, despite containing only historical info on what happened back in 18th century. apparently there are witless ignorant ingrates in america too - i thought this was something especially a reality here in turkey. but it seems every country has those even in the learned circles.

    6. Re:Caesar's to caesar by unity100 · · Score: 1

      and nobody should be let speak about democracy or any kind of republic, if they do not know about late 18th century enlightenment and french revolution.

    7. Re:Caesar's to caesar by unity100 · · Score: 1

      brutal as he may be, he have unwittingly slaughtered many of the nobility and hence very probably almost totally eliminated a possibility of royalist revolution.

    8. Re:Caesar's to caesar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Non, non, non! Il n'est pas le Revolution, il s'appelle le Wii!

    9. Re:Caesar's to caesar by unity100 · · Score: 1

      mon cher, i dont speak a word of french.

    10. Re:Caesar's to caesar by Sunburnt · · Score: 1

      i bet you would call them 'socialist' and demean them, gratifying the king if you were to live at that era.

      And I bet you could use a little more ability to detect sarcasm. I was ragging on Fox, the WSJ editorial page (same thing now, I suppose) and their eager consumers, not the French.

      --
      Tags != Comments, and -1 (Troll) != -1 (I Would Respond Angrily To This Poster So They Must Be Trolling)
    11. Re:Caesar's to caesar by unity100 · · Score: 1

      well, in /. i saw so many of that kind that my sarcasm scale went off, went rather skeptic excuse me.

  10. Sweet mama ! it really works well by unity100 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I get in, i type in "smokie" and voila, 14 songs pop up, groovy too. i click, and it plays, and it plays well, and it doesnt even require one single bit of anything - it has its own player in the site and plays well - actually at the same time with winamp playing some other thing.

    its fast also.

    1. Re:Sweet mama ! it really works well by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      and it doesnt even require one single bit of anything

      Well, aside from a full webbrowser with a modern version of flash and enough resources to pull off audio decoding at the same time. Yeah, doesn't sound like much, but kind of rules out streaming this from any kind of embeded device (i.e nintendo ds with homebrew, a cellphone, pda, etc.)

      If I'm at my desktop I might as well just listen to all the music I have stored on it. I suppose this could be useful for using other peoples machines or maybe laptops where you dont have the storage to throw at a local collection.
      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    2. Re:Sweet mama ! it really works well by larry+bagina · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I just used it on my 400Mhz arm phone with opera. It works as well as my core 2 duo/firefox desktop machine.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    3. Re:Sweet mama ! it really works well by shmlco · · Score: 1

      Since you can use this to listen to the entire song, maybe the torrent-types could use it instead of... naw. What am I thinking?

      (Still, another torrent-rationalization bites the dust.)

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    4. Re:Sweet mama ! it really works well by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Stream low quality or download and have a high bitrate copy? Yeah, that's going to keep me from downloading.

      My library is half downloaded half iTunes.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    5. Re:Sweet mama ! it really works well by shmlco · · Score: 1

      I probably don't have to say this, but one of the rationalizations torrent-types use is that the 30-second clips on iTunes or other sales sites won't let them listen to the entire song. As such, they're "forced" to download the entire thing to find out.

      And of course, once they've decided they like it they'll buy a legitimate copy.

      With this service, however, that excuse disappears. (Not like they can't hear the whole thing at a friends, on TV or radio, or in a music store, but I digress.)

      But like I said, it's just a rationalization. As you point out, people who want to rip off music will just find another justification for doing so...

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    6. Re:Sweet mama ! it really works well by thc69 · · Score: 1

      Here's the thing about people who are, as you say, ripping off music: They're also getting excited about music and buying more than they were going to buy if they were doing other things with their time.

      That's an observation I've made of my own past behavior, and it correlates well with the sales and piracy statistics released by the RIAA. First they report piracy is at a high, then they report sales have reached a high. Later, they report piracy is down, and after that, sales follow.

      I never spent more money on music than when I was enjoying the original Napster and Audiogalaxy and other P2P systems.

      --
      Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
    7. Re:Sweet mama ! it really works well by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      Wow, it does. I heard about this site the other day, but I somehow missed the fact that they were streaming ALL music to you. I saw the 'upload your mp3' button and thought it was just stuff you'd uploaded, but they'd stream it to you anywhere. It's working quite well for me here on Linux w/ Flash 9.

      About the uploads, though... Are they saying if you upload an album they don't have, they'll share it with others? I really have to question the legality of that... And if -I- upload an album that I've bought, and they break the law... How liable am I? I've got a few albums that I'd like to listen to at work, but dragging around my MP3 player all the time and recharging, etc is getting old. I -suppose- I could burn a DVD of MP3s, but it'd be nice to just stream it in and then it's wherever I go.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    8. Re:Sweet mama ! it really works well by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      I'm guilty of that. As I said in my post above, half my library is purchased (iTMS) songs. Songs I had torrented first and liked. I enjoy one album from an artist and I go a little crazy with the buy album button. I also spent $100 all in one go buying all the Trek movies.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    9. Re:Sweet mama ! it really works well by unity100 · · Score: 1

      i dont think theyll be streaming your uploads to other people.

    10. Re:Sweet mama ! it really works well by shmlco · · Score: 1

      "They're also getting excited about music andbuying more than they were going to buy if they were doing other things with their time."

      Spare me the party line, please. For every person who's "excited" about music there's ten who could care less as long as they have the most popular background music. I know too many students who download and who use the money they could have spent on music on more beer and clothes.

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    11. Re:Sweet mama ! it really works well by thc69 · · Score: 1

      I don't know about any "party line". In the two years I've been saying it, I haven't seen the same observation from anybody else until a couple months ago when someone had something similar to say.

      If you don't think it's true, how do you explain sales following piracy, as reported by the RIAA? They, of course, never made the connection, but I noticed that each time they issued a press release about piracy levels they followed in a couple months with a press release about sales that went in the same direction as piracy did.

      I wish I could find the press release where they said they had piracy "under control" or something similar and give you the link. I think they got rid of it, but IIRC it happened about 6 months ago.

      --
      Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
  11. Re:Goodbye Pandora, Bonjour Deezer? by sayfawa · · Score: 1

    The only thing Pandora asked of me to "prove" I'm in the US is a zip code. So I gave them one. I'm not in the US and I'm still using it with no problems.

    --
    Free the Quark 3 from asymptotic confinement! Bring your charm! Don't get down! All colours and flavours welcome!
  12. Could me more secure... by khendron · · Score: 2, Funny

    When you register they go through the motions of applying a secure sign-up process by not activating you until you've clicked the activation link in the email they send you. But with the activation link being deezer.com/confirm.php?email=, why bother?

    Oh, and after you've clicked the link they email you your password in the clear.

    --
    Life is like a web application. Sometime you need cookies just to get by.
    1. Re:Could me more secure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I thought the "security" and clear passwords were lame too. But as for the website itself, after registering I found the interface to be pretty rich. As a person living outside the US, I think it is more than an adequate replacement for Pandora. No more "Sorry, you have skipped too many tracks this hour" crap.

      The only disappointing part is that when you listen to a song and then click the "Create Smartplaylist for this artist" button, it immediately stops the song and plays something else. So obviously they've got a few kinks to work out, but this will definitely change the way we listen to music on the web.

    2. Re:Could me more secure... by BungaDunga · · Score: 1

      Noticed that myself. At least hash the email address in the confirmation link.

  13. one important benefit by unity100 · · Score: 1

    sometimes you vaguely remember a song you dont have and need to find it. or test out some pieces before buying them from somewhere. this thing will work great for it.

  14. Anything else? by djinnn · · Score: 0

    A bunch of freedom fries, please.

    1. Re:Anything else? by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

      You are behind the times. Euro-bashing is no longer necessary, friendly administrations have been elected in Germany and France. ;-)

  15. Friendly to what browser(s)? by baomike · · Score: 1

    Looked for a couple of songs using opera, didn't find (not unusual) but could not back out.
    Maybe the content will increase in the future. The songs I was looking for were in french so I thought they might have them.

    I hope this is the start of a trend.

  16. I for one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    welcome our french music-streaming overlords.

  17. Bah! by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    Let them eat cake!

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  18. Worshipping Lord Cthulhu pays off... by Tatisimo · · Score: 1
    Just when I turn to a Cthulhu cult for all my spiritual needs, I find http://www.jamendo.com/ and now this! On the same day!

    Phnglui Mglwnafh Cthulhu R'lyeh Wgah Nagl F'htagn!

    --
    Give Kashyyyk back to the Wookies
  19. Re:Goodbye Pandora, Bonjour Deezer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Dear Pandora Visitor,

    We are deeply, deeply sorry to say that due to licensing constraints, we can no longer allow access to Pandora for most listeners located outside of the U.S. We will continue to work diligently to realize the vision of a truly global Pandora, but for the time being we are required to restrict its use. We are very sad to have to do this, but there is no other alternative.

    We believe that you are in Canada (your IP address appears to be XX.XXX.XXX.XXX). If you believe we have made a mistake, we apologize and ask that you please contact us at pandora-support@pandora.com

    If you are a paid subscriber, please contact us at pandora-support@pandora.com and we will issue a pro-rated refund to the credit card you used to sign up. If you have been using Pandora, we will keep a record of your existing stations and bookmarked artists and songs, so that when we are able to launch in your country, they will be waiting for you.

    We will be notifying listeners as licensing agreements are established in individual countries. If you would like to be notified by email when Pandora is available in your country, please enter your email address below. The pace of global licensing is hard to predict, but we have the ultimate goal of being able to offer our service everywhere.

    We share your disappointment and greatly appreciate your understanding.

    Sincerely,
    Tim Westergren
    Founder


    Yes, I know I could use a proxy or use several other clever tricks to waste my time trying/succeeding, but if other countries are providing the content without me having to make the effort to break disagreable american laws, it is clearly the american internet entrepreneur's loss.

  20. imeem.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    You might have missed this, but imeem.com has been offering free streaming of music from Warner Brothers as well as many smaller labels for some time now. It's all advertisign supported and in reality it's more like 'youtube for music' where music gets checked on upload to see if it's licensed and if it's part of the deals they've signed then any user on the site can hear it full length.

  21. Bitchin by Athaulf · · Score: 1

    Period XD

  22. SACEM != RIAA by reSonans · · Score: 5, Informative

    SACEM is the French performing rights organization, equivalent to either ASCAP or BMI in the US, or SOCAN in Canada. They're not a lobby group comprised of commercial record labels. They collect royalties from broadcasts and performances on behalf of French musicians.

    --
    Light the blue touch-paper and retire immediately.
    1. Re:SACEM != RIAA by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Whatever, they're all standover men.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:SACEM != RIAA by shark72 · · Score: 4, Informative

      "SACEM is the French performing rights organization, equivalent to either ASCAP or BMI in the US, or SOCAN in Canada. They're not a lobby group comprised of commercial record labels. They collect royalties from broadcasts and performances on behalf of French musicians."

      This bears amplification.

      SACEM, ASCAP/BMI, SOCAN, etc.: performing rights organizations which represent artists, composers and lyricists. THE GOOD GUYS.

      The French equivalent of the RIAA is the IFPI. The RIAA and the IFPI represent the recording industry. THE BAD GUYS.

      Performing rights organizations represent a potential revenue stream for artists, composers and lyricists that the record companies generally don't see and can't touch. You know how we all want the record companies to go away but for artists to be compensated, in a way which doesn't require us to pay for the music? Performing rights organizations are the way that can happen. The summary's statement that SACEM is the equivalent of the RIAA was dangerously misleading.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    3. Re:SACEM != RIAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      SACEM, ASCAP/BMI, SOCAN, etc.: performing rights organizations which represent artists, composers and lyricists. THE GOOD GUYS.

      The good guys?. These good guys (the European performing rights organizations in europe: SACEM, SGAE...) try to collect a fee on every damn cdr, dvdr, printer, mp3 player or even hd sold. Oh, and on Internet access too.

    4. Re:SACEM != RIAA by loopkin · · Score: 1

      No, no, the French equivalent of the RIAA is the SNEP (Syndicat national de l'édition phonographique), whose president is Pascal Nègre, who happens to be also president of Universal Music France. This guy is the French "pope" of the old style business model (that is: press CDs, send "pirates" to jail, rip off artists as much as possible, sell junk, ...).

    5. Re:SACEM != RIAA by Renaud · · Score: 1

      on behalf of French musicians.

      Well, not only. Any music performed or broadcast in France gets their share. SACEM redistributes those royalties to their counterparts abroad (like BMI/ASCAP)

    6. Re:SACEM != RIAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good guy? Well I wouldn't call them like that.
      Just one example : on a teacher's retirement, some parent had their children sing on old popular song on this theme (Adieu Monsieur le professeur) as a surprise for the teacher.
      The SACEM had the teacher prosecuted, for not having declared the use of this song.
      Even the author was upset by the SACEM attitude and offered to pay the bill...

    7. Re:SACEM != RIAA by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

      SACEM, ASCAP/BMI, SOCAN, etc.: performing rights organizations which represent artists, composers and lyricists. THE GOOD GUYS.

      The good guys?. These good guys (the European performing rights organizations in europe: SACEM, SGAE...) try to collect a fee on every damn cdr, dvdr, printer, mp3 player or even hd sold. Oh, and on Internet access too. Maybe the GP post was using "good" in a relative sense. As in, "Jack the Ripper" was a good guy. After all, he was never a member of the RIAA.
      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    8. Re:SACEM != RIAA by anticypher · · Score: 2, Informative

      All my information here comes from working peripherally around DG Competition, the European Commission's directorate that oversees all things to do with "free markets", monopolies, and the like. I also know a lot of francophone musicians.

      SACEM ... THE GOOD GUYS

      Hardly.

      The really bad.

      SACEM was created under the Vichy regime in France in 1941, and headed up by a group of six wealthy supporters and close friends of some of the ministers of the Vichy government. I've almost Godwined this thread at this point, so I'll tread carefully. SACEM was to collect all royalties, but only distribute those royalties to artists who swore affirmation that they were of pure aryan descent. They were supposed to keep all the royalties from non-aryan artists, to compensate the Vichy government who was trying to counter the effects of non-pure music like jazz and swing. Being typical corrupt french bureaucrats, the monies never saw their way to the Vichy government, and at the end of the war the 6 heads of the SACEM escaped the hangmans noose by fleeing to Argentina, Monaco, and Canada. All were extremely wealthy at that point, and the two who were returned to stand trial were able to escape capital punishment by claiming to have kept all the monies from the Vichy government as an act of resistance and patriotism. SACEM was condemned to pay all the monies to the artists and their heirs, but didn't start to do so until 1968. The monies collected from 1941 to 1947 have never been paid to the artists or their heirs. The monies collected for non-aryan French, which includes Corsicans, Tahitians, Algerians, Blacks, Jews, Catalans was only partially paid from 1947 until 1968, when the heads of SACEM were replaced in a political scandal at the end of the de Gaul era. After 1968, SACEM started to live up to its role as protector of artists.

      The bad.

      SACEM has the de facto monopoly for collecting all monies on French territory for lyricists and composers, from every source possible. Radio stations, concert halls, bars, carnivals, advertising jingles and so on. No songwriter or lyricist can directly get paid from a rave DJ or radio station. All the money has to be collected by SACEM, who deduct administrative costs, then pass on the rest. Until they tangled with Daft Punk, who managed to get some of the rules changed, but the high court of France confirmed that the monopoly served the public interest and that competition would hurt both artists and society at large. It also makes sure artists don't cheat too much on their taxes.

      The not so bad.

      Daft Punk. Heroes to all French authors, composers, songwriters. Daft Punk was two excellent musicians who wrote all their own works, then sold the tracks directly to DJs for special performances at raves and large events. Since the music was good, radio stations started playing the music, paying standard rates to SACEM. Daft Punk had a string of top 10 hits across Europe in the mid '90s, and got their money from other country's rights management groups except for SACEM. SACEM wanted them to sign over all their rights, Daft Punk took them to court, fought hard all the way to the French equivalent of the Supreme Court, lost most of their arguments, but managed to win some changes in SACEM.

      The Cour de Cassation reaffirmed that SACEM's main role was to protect authors, composers and lyricists, and that having multiple competing groups would weaken that role. But Daft Punk won the battles to keep some of their rights, such as internet broadcast, CD-ROM sales (not pressed CDs from labels, CD-ROMs of their live concerts) and a few other new technologies that a lumbering bureaucracy like SACEM is completely unable to keep up with.

      Further missives from Brussels based on the Daft Punk ruling, amongst others, have opened up the possibility for copyleft and creative commons style licenses in France, where musicians can release their music for free and not have the SACEM collecting in their name (and then not passing on the mo

      --
      Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
    9. Re:SACEM != RIAA by gravis777 · · Score: 1

      Good thing I read this. I was about to comment there was a typo, I glanced over the article too fast. I thought they were refering to SECAM

  23. Making my work day better already:) by poisonfruitloops · · Score: 1

    wowser. At first i thought this was a bleh. idea. But so far i've listened to a lotta music i've been intending to for ages just sitting here at work. legally for a change too. Internet radio is ok. but after 3 songs i generally through my headphones down in anger as they put something crap on:( The library so far is impressive (IMO)

  24. imeem.com Has Been Doing This In The US For A Whil by illectro · · Score: 2, Informative

    You might have missed this imeem.com has been doing this for a while, as well as the usual selection of indie labels the massive news was that Warner Brothers music has basicly given them streaming rights to their catalog which includes hundreds of mainstream artists. All advertising supported and free (well I guess you have to sign up for an account)

  25. Who the fuck cares by talledega500 · · Score: 2

    I want all this stuff back online. I want the guitar tabs
    and all the stuff that the RIAA has bullied people about for years
    with no consideration of fair use.

    I could give a crap about little pussy agreements with governments.
    Fair use is dead and thats killing the internet

    1. Re:Who the fuck cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's an agreement between SACEM and Deezer, no government is involved in this...

      And fair use doesn't exist in France anyway.

  26. Damn Universal.... by meuhlavache · · Score: 3, Informative

    Thanks to Universal to order Deezer.com to stop stream their content due to a lack of communication between them. For more information (in french): http://www.freenews.fr/nat/5144-presse-deezer-com- universal-acte-3.html The little history is Neuf Cegetel, french ISP, sign a contract with Universal allow their subscribers to download and listen DRM protected music. Deezer.com was associated with Free.fr, another ISP (one of the most important in France), after a strategic "Joke" in press by Free. Now Deezer get the feedback of Free.fr actions..... Please Universal: let us listen free music! I hope my english is not that bad! =)

  27. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  28. Re:Goodbye Pandora, Bonjour Deezer? by kalaf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I did the same, and they sent an email a few months back saying they knew I wasn't in the US and they were being pressured to cut off access from certain countries by a set date. Pandora stopped working on that date.

    It's really sad for the RIAA, since Pandora was the only way they could bleed any money from me (from Pandora's pocket, of course). I thought about finding a proxy server to bypass their filters, but decided that if the music industry was going to be that obtuse about people giving them money I couldn't even justify sending them additional pennies by proxy...

  29. Excellent....pity it sucks by svunt · · Score: 1

    Colour me unimpressed. First track, and it pauses every 30 seconds for 2-3 seconds (I have 24mb/s of downstream), and the interface is kinda sucky. Still, on the political front, great news.

    1. Re:Excellent....pity it sucks by gaderael · · Score: 1

      Um, it's playing fine for me as of right now. They got slashdotted, perhaps?

      --
      Anyone got a light for my sig?
    2. Re:Excellent....pity it sucks by meuhlavache · · Score: 1

      Peering problems? or maybe slashdotted like gaderael say...

  30. would've been cool 5 years ago, but . . . by cashman73 · · Score: 1

    This would've been really cool had it come out about 5 years ago, but today, with all the music videos available on YouTube, who wants to stream the music when you can get the whole music video? Still, I suppose the library might be a little greater, as you can get more than just some of the major, popular songs that music videos are made for,... But still,...

    1. Re:would've been cool 5 years ago, but . . . by Yoozer · · Score: 1

      Youtube has a very significant dip in the frequency spectrum at 11khz, and videos include taped-from-VHS-re-encoded versions.

  31. Re:Goodbye Pandora, Bonjour Deezer? by JohnBailey · · Score: 1

    Same here (so far at least) in the UK. Listening to it right now. Although I haven't logged in for a while, so they may be updating their lists of non American users.

    --
    It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it.
  32. The French equivalent to the RIAA???? by RobertM1968 · · Score: 1

    "The French website Deezer.com has struck a deal with the SACEM (the French equivalent to the RIAA) and is now legally providing Internet users around the world with more than 100,000 full songs, streamed on demand and without restrictions. The site, formerly named Blogmuzik.net, had had to close down last March under pressure from the recording industry."

    Ummm... let me be the first to point out that SACEM is NOT the French equivalent of the RIAA... at least not if they are allowing "more than 100,000 full songs, streamed on demand and without restrictions."

    But maybe the RIAA will take a lesson from this and come to their senses and convince their member companies (themselves) to come up with and/or support more viable Internet distribution methods as a business model instead of their current "Sue 'em all and then some more people for good measure" attitude. In addition, their Internet Royalty Arm (SoundExchange) is still leaning the exact opposite way (making such things costly, and waffling back and forth between forcing the websites to add encumbering restrictions to the content - ie: DRM). While SoundExchange seems to be/have waffled on some of that, they are still a far cry from what SACEM seems to be allowing and setting up.

    Hopefully this will prove to be enough of a viable business model in France that the RIAA/SoundExchange will take note and head down a different road than their current one...

  33. The French out ahead again by Oztechreich · · Score: 1

    I'm pleased to see that the Europeans are again taking a jump ahead of the colonials.
    These days I pretty much exclusively get my music from http://www.jamendo.com/ where all the music is free (and much of it is pretty terrible, by the way, but there is also some excellent stuff.)
    After observing the *AA fiasco, I've decided to vote with my wallet. Nowadays all my financial contributions are volutary. Jamendo provides me with a way to pay however much I like for the music I like, and just about all of it goes to the artist (for a change.)
    Go the French!

    --
    10001001111001110110011000011101110
  34. The first nickel bag is free... by posterlogo · · Score: 1
    Imagine if this was all one big devious plot to collect IP addresses, etc., to monitor more closely in the future...

    Nah, the RIAA wouldn't be that devious, would it?

    1. Re:The first nickel bag is free... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then they would collect half of all the IP addresses in the world...

      Hey, I can do that: [0-127].[0-255].[0-255].[0-255] or 0.0.0.0/1.

  35. Did you read their terms of use? by zugurudumba · · Score: 1

    People who upload music are supposed to have permission from the copyright holder. That means 98% of the mainstream music hosted on their site has been uploaded without permission. No, seriously, this site is just as legal as YouTube.

    --
    Sig
  36. Re:Goodbye Pandora, Bonjour Deezer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Same here, they detected my country of origin (IP based, presumably).

    I had to tunnel my ip traffic to pandora back to the US to be able to listen.

  37. Re:Goodbye Pandora, Bonjour Deezer? by Skrynkelberg · · Score: 1

    If you still want to listen, just use one of the free proxy servers on the net.

    For example: Pandora Proxy

  38. Sounds fishy by David+Off · · Score: 3, Interesting

    SACEM (Société des Auteurs, Compositeurs et Editeurs de Musiques) have been working with the RIAA to shut down allofmp3.com in Russia. SACEM's boss claimed that the Russian's only had rights to exploit the RAO catalogue on Russian territory. Presumably SACEM only has rights to exploit their member's catalogue and then probably only on French soil. According to another article the agreement will be signed in the next few days. As France is a part of the WTO etc. I assume the RIAA will take Deezer/SACEM to court if the agreement exceeds their rights.

  39. Last.fm and Project Playlist by ivan+kk · · Score: 1

    Where do http://www.last.fm/ and http://www.projectplaylist.com/ compare to deezer?

    1. Re:Last.fm and Project Playlist by szyzyg · · Score: 1

      Well projectplaylist is a shameless rip off of imeem.com except that it hasn't managed to sign any deals with major labels, so it's even less interesting than deezer.com

  40. Not always 32 kbps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I downloaded some of the files and played them in Winamp.

    Winamp's file info box is telling me that a file is a MPEG-1 layer 3
    320kbit, 48000Hz Stereo and the others are MPEG-1 layer 3
    192kbit, 44100Hz Joint Stereo

    It seems that they encoded different files at different bitrates.

    1. Re:Not always 32 kbps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did you download the files?

  41. A better recap.. by Renaud · · Score: 1

    SACEM is NOT the french equivalent to the RIAA !

    It is the equivalent of the US-based BMI and ASCAP, and that makes a big difference : SACEM manages the rights of songwriters / composers / publishers, NOT the rights on actual recordings.

    This means that what Deezer.com did is a first, necessary but not sufficient step, and at this point they would merely have the right to have someone perform those songs again and re-record them, then stream the result!

    What they have yet to do, is to get a deal for the actual rights to the recordings, with the real french equivalent of the RIAA : the SCPP (major labels) and SPPF (independent labels). Not the IFPI (as I've read in another comment) which is just an international club of the RIA*'s.

    And that's where it becomes tricky : the Deezer.com announcement comes 2 days after Universal Music France teamed up with France's 3rd largest ISP (neuf.fr, with whom they share the same parent company, Vivendi) to launch a heavily marketed, Windows DRM-based, unlimited music offering.

    France's 2nd ISP, Free, probably the most innovative, net-savvy, and the last independent one, immediately decided to promote Deezer.com to steal Neuf's thunder.

    Now, Universal is saying Deezer.com is illegal, and they're threatening to sue them and any entity that would overtly promote it.
    They are technically right, but obviously you have to read between the lines to understand the real motive behind that potential lawsuit...

  42. Re:Goodbye Pandora, Bonjour Deezer? by nogginthenog · · Score: 1

    Same here. And I know of at least one other person in the UK using Pandora.

  43. Lot's of buzz, but it won't last by nsebban · · Score: 2, Informative

    From what is said in the French press and on French news websites, Deezer's music catalog is far from being 100% legal. They have a few agreements, but for most of the songs they have at best *contacted* the corresponding recording company.

    They have a temporary agreement with the SACEM, till December 2007, with the SACEM having the ability to make it stop even sooner if they want. What makes me think this thing won't last, is the fact their agreement is based on the promise that their service is the first one where the user can listen to the music without the data being downloaded on the user's system, and without the user having the ability to record it.

    In other words they guarantee that there's no way for user to record a song and listen to it without using their service. Hello there, Total Recorder and similar applications.

    --
    ____
    nico
    Nico-Live
  44. Streaming by dominious · · Score: 1

    I see alot of posts above complaining about slow streaming and buffering, but I have to say here in the UK it seems to be working fine. The whole song loads up in 50 seconds.

  45. Not so simple by pive · · Score: 1

    Actually Deezer is still negociating with major and indie record companies, according to an article from mainstream newspaper Le Monde (in french). The deal with SACEM was just the beginning of a long process, IMO. In addition, a flaw in the streaming system has been discovered, allowing users to directly download mp3 from the site, according to the same article. Bet this is not going to help the negociations.

  46. Re:Goodbye Pandora, Bonjour Deezer? by sayfawa · · Score: 1

    Durn. Thanks for the info. I only started using it a week ago. I guess I'll stop using it now before I get used to it and build up many playlists only to have it taken away.

    Well, bon jour Deezer!

    --
    Free the Quark 3 from asymptotic confinement! Bring your charm! Don't get down! All colours and flavours welcome!
  47. Did anyone else read... by r_jensen11 · · Score: 1

    ESCAM instead of SACEM?

  48. Weapons of mass destruction found in France by JSchoeck · · Score: 1
    Weapons of mass destruction found in France - Bush prepares invasion of France for january 2008.

    Experts arguing about connection to DMCA and the RIAA suddenly vanish.

  49. Perhaps it was too good to be true... by posterlogo · · Score: 1

    The site worked great a not long ago, but now seems to be loading more slowly. I guess the popularity of this service may make it near unusable if they don't work out their bandwidth issues.

  50. Not he RIAA by Denis+Troller · · Score: 1
    Just so you now, the SACEM is not the French RIAA.

    The SACEM ("Societe des Auteurs Compositeurs et Editeurs de Musique", http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soci%C3%A9t%C3%A9_des _auteurs%2C_compositeurs_et_%C3%A9diteurs_de_musiq ue) is the organisation that takes care of collecting and managing artists' fees. Everytime you use a song from someone else (play it with your band, use it as a DJ...), this is where you have to pay in order for the artist to be rewarded.

    This explains why they were able to strike a deal with them. Majors (Universal for example) are actually not happy about that site and are menacing to sue them (the deals are not signed yet, but the site is already up and running).

    --
    That's not a nick, that's my NAME.
  51. Regarding covers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Joan Baez performing a cover of "No woman, no cry" live here.

    1. Re:Regarding covers by anticypher · · Score: 1

      Yep, you write something on /. and the bastards change what they are doing to prove you wrong. It seems that despite much press recently about the licensing agreement, Deezer is just some guys sharing their pirated MP3 collection while trying to claim legitimacy. Just hours after this story hit /. and I posted a few comments, others have pointed out all the flaws in the service. They are hosted at Free.fr, the second largest ISP in France, but they have no real business relationship with free except for paying for dedicated hosting service.

      They dodged hefty fines and a possible jail term by signing an agreement with SACEM, but they still have to clean up their act and obtain the performance rights agreements from other rights groups. All they really did was change their domain name, and put out all the music they've downloaded with random quality.

      the AC

      --
      Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on