Slashdot Mirror


Fermilab — Excursions Into Matter, Space and Time

An anonymous reader writes "Fermilab is one of the great physics research facilities in the U.S. It is mainly known for its Tevatron proton/anti-proton accelerator to help physicists understand how materials interact with each other. TG Daily has a extensive article detailing Fermilab's accelerator chain and the work that is being done there. It's an interesting read, especially since many of us won't have a chance to visit Fermilab and the fact that the Tevatron accelerator is scheduled to be shut down next year."

71 comments

  1. No matter... by mastermemorex · · Score: 4, Funny

    All we have to know about mater-space-time is in the series documental Star-Trek.

    1. Re:No matter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I have this sneaking suspicion that English is, perhaps, not your first language.

      For what it is worth, the word is "documentary," Star Trek should not be hyphenated, and "mater-space-time" should probably be "matter, space, and time".

      - Signed anonymously since some folks may think this is trolling when I am, in fact, just trying to help a non-native speaker

    2. Re:No matter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Of course english isn't his first language. He's a Thermian in search of a captain for their starship.

    3. Re:No matter... by mastermemorex · · Score: 0

      Well, not exacto at all. I came from the future through a space-time-warp made with a positronic-bubble. The future-English is spoken in this way.

    4. Re:No matter... by Bloater · · Score: 1

      time-law will-has forbidden revealing postronic-bubble-tek or your space-time-travel while in was-space. back-travel at once for recycling.

      Oh no! I've revealed my space-time-travel too. I must back-travel now.

      By recycling I ensure my life
      Improvement saves my matter
      I give thanks for learning
      By recycling I ensure my life

    5. Re:No matter... by mastermemorex · · Score: 0

      Yes. In fact as you will discover soon, it is not possible to move matter through time only information. I am physically in the future, but I am able to write in Slashdot through a quantum synchronization.
      You will be surprise how many aliens and people from the future are writing in Slashdot. :)

    6. Re:No matter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem only is finding WiFi SSID available on photoelectric quantum tensor for live history pre-2004. But after 2010 or so, access getting to historic internets pretty ubiquitous. (Thanks future past people!) Still it's possible access history older through direct circuit state modality, but that require lot of precision (knowing exact target circuit location) - photoelectric pushing RF to WiFi through lots easier.

      Which rig better btw? Microsingularity torsion, or photon orbital flux? Still debating with past future self...

    7. Re:No matter... by master_p · · Score: 1

      Star Trek may be fictional and even wrong sometimes, but puts you in the right mindset, i.e. that of science. Unlike other recent successes (*caugh* Harry Potter *caugh*) which are completely mindless...

  2. Fermilab Bison by sonoronos · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One thing that the article leaves out, unfortunately, is another unique property of Fermilab - that it owns a herd of American Bison. Having "signature" animals at National Labs isn't unique to Fermi - for example, Argonne National Labs, also in Illinois, has a large population of the cream-colored Dama Dama "White Deer." However, while Argonne merely allows the deer to roam freely on its land, Fermilab Bison are actively cultivated by the lab, creating some really fine breeding studs, and acting as a sustainable way of preserving one aspect of the natural "Prairie" that is part of North American history.

    1. Re:Fermilab Bison by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Funny

      The Femilab bison have to be fine breeding studs; travelling at half light speed and crashing into a matter sample in under a millisecond doesn't leave much time for foreplay.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:Fermilab Bison by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually that was on page 4
      Bisons
      6800 acres of land provide lots of opportunity to preserve vegetation and wildlife. Arriving at Fermilab through its signature gate in fact feels much more like arriving at a park rather than a high-energy research site. Vegetation is brought back to its original prairie state; wildlife includes 277 bird species, 54 species of butterflies, about 18,000 Canada geese during migration cycles, more than 350 deers - and 45 bisons.

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    3. Re:Fermilab Bison by martyb · · Score: 5, Funny

      However, while Argonne merely allows the deer to roam freely on its land, Fermilab Bison are actively cultivated by the lab, creating some really fine breeding studs, and acting as a sustainable way of preserving one aspect of the natural "Prairie" that is part of North American history.

      And let me guess... they named the first calf a "Higgs Bison"? <grin>

    4. Re:Fermilab Bison by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      and be careful not to step in some puon

    5. Re:Fermilab Bison by Octopus · · Score: 2, Informative

      I grew up near the edge of Fermilab, so did most of my family. Pretty easy for kids to take a bike ride straight in there. Lots of weird anomoly rumors, too, which is natural.

      I think security clamped down suddenly after 9/11.

      If anyone's interested in some of Fermilab's history and culture, check out Leon Lederman's "The God Particle".

    6. Re:Fermilab Bison by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      Should not reply to self but oh well. I might come off to harsh, they did mention the bison but not to the level you did. Interesting to know. This article also had a few spelling errors that even I noticed which is saying a lot.

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    7. Re:Fermilab Bison by Genda · · Score: 1

      DOH!!!

      ... and I thought Bisons were particles having the mixed properties of Pions an Bosons!!!


      - It's like trying to discover how our government work by colliding the House and Senate at nearly the speed of light, and see what kind of laws are created...
  3. Not like Fermilab is shutting down by manasclerk · · Score: 2, Informative

    They're working on getting the International Linear Collider to be based between them and Argonne National Laboratory, a few miles away. Of course, that will probably just be a really deep, really long tunnel, unless you're into the engineering of these things.

    1. Re:Not like Fermilab is shutting down by MontyApollo · · Score: 1

      I had a professor that was not too optimistic about new projects like this in particle physics. He said something several thousand PhD particle physicists are going to be out of work when Fermilab shuts down, and none of the proposals for new research that would keep them employed in the field were having much luck. I believe he said Americans were already the biggest contingent at CERN as particle physics research fades in the US.

    2. Re:Not like Fermilab is shutting down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rumor has it that the Linear Collider will keep a flock of Big Horn sheep.

    3. Re:Not like Fermilab is shutting down by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They're working on getting the International Linear Collider to be based between them and Argonne National Laboratory

      Actually I understood the site was to be a green-field site somewhere between Fermi and DeKalb. However they face a very hard battle getting it based in the US. There is still considerable resentment over the cancellation of the SSC in the international community: they got foreign investment and then the US congress cancelled the project. There is also the significant problem of visas which, although it has recently eased somewhat is still a major pain. Try persuading the Chinese or Indians that they should invest money in a lab that they will have significant problems ever visiting, let alone working at.

      In the past the US could just front the cost by itself but the expense of the newest accelerators now requires global cooperation. So unless the US government can learn to act as a responsible funding partner and host it will be an uphill battle to get an international science projects of this magnitude based there. Plus I bet they would have a far easier time selling the original idea of a site somewhere in Northern California! This may sound trivial but you are trying to attract the best and brightest minds in the world to this project and it is worth remembering that people like this generally have a large number of options open to them. Unless they have family there moving to northern Illinois is not likely to be something that will be attractive - although as a colleague of mine put it when we were both based at Fermilab: sometimes we have to suffer for our science!

  4. Re:Fermilab Bison (burgers) by apsmith · · Score: 1

    Plus, they fed us great buffalo burgers a few times when I was there as an undergrad student helping with one of the projects :-) That was a loooong time ago though, I wonder where the bison go these days.

    --

    Energy: time to change the picture.

  5. Paging Dr. Gordon Freeman by a-zarkon! · · Score: 1
    From TFA,

    This environment allows the protons and antiprotons to be lifted into another energy dimension:

    So when they have "beam loss" or a "quench" - is that when the portal to Xen opens up? Now where did I leave that crowbar...

  6. steel cuts like butter apparently by wizardforce · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Controlling a 0.98 tera electron volt (TeV) beam requires quite some precision: Even if just a portion of this beam gets out of control - scientists refer to this event as "beam loss" - a "quench" can happen and damage is done very quickly: While these quenches do not happen very often, a problem for example in the cryogenic system can cause the beam to leave its path. The Tevatron has an automated shutdown function in such a case, but the high energy causes damage even within short time periods: Within 16 ns, one beam burned through about 1.5 m (about 5 feet) of solid steel.
    they built themselves a deathray :)
    --
    Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    1. Re:steel cuts like butter apparently by jimstapleton · · Score: 1

      Butter? That makes water look difficult to cut, in comparison.

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    2. Re:steel cuts like butter apparently by Randseed · · Score: 1

      Now, all they need to do is miniaturize the frickin' beam generator so that it can be mounted on the frickin' head of a frickin' shark.

    3. Re:steel cuts like butter apparently by witte · · Score: 1

      [Homer] mmm... crispy scientist bacon... mmm... *drool*

  7. Bigots! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    "Fermilab is one of the great physics research facilities in the U.S. It is mainly known for its Tevatron proton/anti-proton accelerator"

    I am dismayed that Fermilab is so anti-proton, and they are accelerating anti-protonism.

    1. Re:Bigots! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, anti-proton is so negative. They need to be more positron.

  8. Actually, it's on page 4 by apsmith · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The bison are indeed mentioned in the article.

    Some things it doesn't mention though, that I recall from my brief summer there 20+ years back:

    * the radioactive groundhogs. Every national lab I've been to seemed to have a colony of groundhogs, I guess they like the security.... At Fermilab, there was a burrow in the middle of a mile-long berm of dirt that acted as a beam dump to generate neutrinos (only neutrinos make it through that much matter without being stopped).

    * Wilson's artworks - I assume they're still around. Robert Wilson was the instigator of the lab, and got it built on time and under budget. He was also a bit of a sculptor, and a number of his artworks were on the grounds around the administration building. In fact I think he designed the rather unique admin building too.

    * the annual "race around the ring" - actually, maybe that's gone away since Leon Lederman's no longer the lab director. It was quite a challenge when I was there though; you can imagine a bunch of desk physicists and engineers trying to make it around the 3+ miles of the ring road in a reasonable amount of time...

    --

    Energy: time to change the picture.

    1. Re:Actually, it's on page 4 by Xzzy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Wilson's artworks - I assume they're still around.

      They are. The power poles shaped like the Pi symbol are being replaced this summer, they even got the city of Batavia to pay for it.

      One bit of entertaining lore (I can't confirm it's true but I've heard it from several lab veterans) about the art around the lab is the "symmetry" sculpture at the lab's west gate. It's a large arch with three limbs that towers over the roadway, and a visitor paying attention may notice the west-facing (public) side is painted completely black, and the east (lab) side is orange. The reason? Originally the sculpture was entirely orange. Stayed that way for almost 20 years. Eventually locals decided it was an eyesore, orange hasn't been a popular color since the 70's and I guess people got tired of it. So the lab painted the outside flat black to keep the peace with the community.

      Orange and blue is still pretty common around the lab, the CDF detector building even got a fresh coat of paint last year. It is pretty ugly, but it's been that way for decades and it would suck to change it now.

    2. Re:Actually, it's on page 4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Today's random coincidence: I am wearing a Fermilab "slow run with the director" t-shirt from 1994, while John Peoples was director. I don't know about now, but it was still run then. The pictures on the t-shirt show a top quark event and a group of Greek soldiers sailing back to Washington after destroying Waxahachie Texas, where the Superconducting Super Collider was supposed to be. (Waxahachie is represented as Troy.)

  9. The Ring of Fire by ExE122 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The company I work for is involved with the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory in England just outside of Abingdon. They also have a synchotron facility and gave us a demonstration on how they accelerate particles within a beam by bending it with magnets to form a giant ring (I think the one in RAL is about 3 miles in circumference). They use very complex sensors to study the "scattering" of particles colliding with various materials to determine various characteristics and properties.

    It was a very neat and interesting presentation... Unfortunately, having some of the finer details explained by scientists who live and breath the stuff put it just ever so slightly above my level of understanding (I was lost in the first 30 seconds)... At one point, I could've sworn they just broke out some random Star Trek technobabble just to get a laugh out of me later =P.

    I agree with the author, the article is indeed a very interesting read. And yes, while Tevatron is shutting down, US still leads the world in similar facilities, including one not too far from Fermilab at Argonne.

    --
    Capitalism: When it uses the carrot, it's called democracy. When it uses the stick, it's called fascism.
    1. Re:The Ring of Fire by Gromius · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sorry, Rutherford's synchrotron is nothing like the Tevatron. And none of the US's remaining facilities are anything like the Tevatron. The Tevatron is a high energy particle collider (in fact the highest energy one ever built) which has about 1000 times more power than your typical synchrotron. Only the LHC in Europe (which on paper looks 7 times more powerful but in practice is about 3-4 times more powerful) can revival it and its only going to come on line next summer. Put it this way, if RALs synchrotron is a firework rocket, the Tevatron is the space shuttle :) Leading the world in making firework rockets is a tad different from leading the world in space technology. Basically you need that energy to fundamental physics research which you just cant do with the low energy standard ones. For the record, I spent my PhD using Tevatron data to search for evidence that we had managed to rip a whole in our 3 dimensional space and sent a particle into the 5th dimension. You need a fair amount of energy to do that. Dr Grom Former Tevatron Physicist (as of about 4 months ago) Current Rutherford Staff, working on the LHC

    2. Re:The Ring of Fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm... depends what you want to do, RAL is far better at making Neutrons than the Tevatron will ever be. Not everything in the world is High Energy Physics, the intensity frontier is just as important as the energy frontier. If the tevatron is the millenium falcon, ISIS is a star destroyer.

  10. Nothing to see here: Move Along! by bbsguru · · Score: 3, Interesting

    From TFM:
    "Most recently, you may have heard of discovery of the "triple scoop" baryon, which contains one quark from each generation of matter."
    That's really all there is about "the work being done there". This is really just a sort of know your neighbors piece for the local pholks who drive by every day.

    So, Captain, where do they keep the Death Ray?

    1. Re:Nothing to see here: Move Along! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are we quarking up the wrong tree on this one?

  11. Higgs Bison? by HiggsBison · · Score: 2, Funny

    And let me guess... they named the first calf a "Higgs Bison"? <grin>

    Actually, the Higgs Bison would be the ones grazing in the Higgs Field.

    --
    My other car is a 1984 Nark Avenger.
  12. Good followup to the LHC story by iamlucky13 · · Score: 2

    This is really cool to read and compare to the NY Times profile of the Large Hadron Collider at CERN. The feature popped up on Slashdot a few months back.

    While the LHC is much bigger and has more advanced detectors, the basic ideas are similar. Both take free protons, then send them through multiple accellerators, finally delivering them to the big circular accellerators for the collisions.

    The LHC is 17 miles around, while the Tevatron is only about 4 miles. The LHC will cause collisions at 14 TeV compared to Tevatron's 2 TeV. The LHC is completely underground, while the Tevatron is visible on the surface.

    Once the Tevatron is decommissioned, there will still be the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider in New York doing high energy particle physics in the US, and I understand Fermilab and other American institutes will be involved in processing the deluge of data produced by LHC.

    1. Re:Good followup to the LHC story by crgrace · · Score: 1

      There are others besides the RHIC. The Beavatron at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, and of course the Stanford Linear Accelerator are still under operation. The Stanford Linear Accelerator has the B-Factory as one of its targets. The B-factory is an extremely advanced detector (in high energy Meson regime particles) and is the center of the BaBar project.

    2. Re:Good followup to the LHC story by bockelboy · · Score: 2, Informative

      I understand Fermilab and other American institutes will be involved in processing the deluge of data produced by LHC.
      I would say so! FNAL (plus 7 other universities) will probably have around 50% of the processing capacity for the CMS project (one of the LHC detectors).

      Just because the detector isn't physically located at FNAL doesn't mean their contribution isn't significant. The whole design for grid-computing is that a physicist can be just as effective on their laptop in Starbucks as sitting next to the detector.

      A lot of brain power is still there. They're great people to work with too.
    3. Re:Good followup to the LHC story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Stanford Linear Accelerator has the B-Factory as one of its targets. The B-factory is an extremely advanced detector (in high energy Meson regime particles) and is the center of the BaBar project. Babar and PEP-II (which constitute SLAC's B-Factory) are scheduled to end operations during 2008/2009. In the following years, the Linac at SLAC will mainly be used for LCLS (Linac Coherent Light Source), a free-electron laser.
    4. Re:Good followup to the LHC story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought I read a few years back that SLAC had been decommissioned. Maybe there was another accellerator at Stanford?

      I was aware there were other accellerators still in action, but as I understand, RHIC is the most powerful by a decent margin.

    5. Re:Good followup to the LHC story by crgrace · · Score: 1

      How sad. I designed some of the ICs for the drift chamber trigger for PEP-II. I am proud to have been a part of that project, but I haven't worked on it since 1997. Thanks for the update.

  13. Not so cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I work at Fermilab and life here only looks good on outside. Last dozen years the lab has been really struggling with deciding what to do after the Tevatron shutdown. The lab's managemen are bunch of bureaucrats who, in my opinion, lack passion for physics and have no great (or even good) ideas for the future. The lab also struggles with finding the new and capable people. There are large number of people at the lab who have been around for so long that at some point they just got tired of doing physics. For example, the guy who was in charged of designing the magnets for LHC (which famously exploded earlier this year) has been promoted within the lab to a management position (but before they exploded). Somehow, some people are promoted within the lab without the regard to the real performance. There are many many problems with this ageing facility and it is not clear that the organization has talent and will to move into the future.

    1. Re:Not so cool by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah. I've heard similar statements from my friends that have interned there over the summer. But, man its still quite an awesome place to visit. That really was my dream to work there, when I was in grade school. It still inspires that sense of awe. I wonder if they'd let me just live there and herd the buffalo, or at least ride one to work. I must go again soon, so I can look out from the tower's observation deck and stare at the magnificent dirt circle.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    2. Re:Not so cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I also work at Fermilab in the sense that I work on an experiment there, but am university-based. Although the lab management is not perfect, the issue of looking towards the future is actually a much broader issue for the high-energy physics (HEP) community. All of the US HEP accelerators will be shutdown by 2010, and the focus will be on the LHC for the next decade. Given the timescale and resources it takes to build these accelerators we really should be in final stages of design with a funding plan in place in order to take the next step at the energy frontier. We are not even close.

      Part of the problem is that technology has not progressed to the point that we can keep attaining higher and higher energies...we just keep building a bigger hammer. Twenty years ago, it was the SSC that was going to take the place of the Tevatron. It would have been even higher in energy than the LHC with a total collision energy of 40 TeV (20 TeV per beam), as opposed to the LHC's 14 TeV. The project was cancelled in 1993 because the estimated cost had risen to $12 billion from the originally proposed $4.4B. How was it technologically feasible to envision a higher energy accelerator that started construction 15 yrs ago? Simple, it was just bigger...50 miles in circumference as compared to the 17 mile LHC tunnel. Unfortunately bigger means more expensive and that is not a sustainable roadmap for HEP.

      The International Linear Collider, which Fermilab hopes to host, is a similar accelerator on steroids. Start with the 3 km linear accelerator concept from SLAC and build another one that is 30 km long. Not exactly visionary, but it will allow electrons and positrons to collide with a total energy of 500 GeV. This makes it about 2.5 times more energetic than the maximum energy attained for e+/e- collisions at LEP. A rather small increase if you consider the fact that LHC is 7 times more energetic than the Tevatron. Furthermore, at $15 billion it is not cheap to build. The only way such a machine makes sense is if you already know there is a new particle (like the Higgs boson or the least massive super-symmetric partner) in that range. If you know that the particle is there from a fuzzy snapshot taken at the LHC, then the ILC is the machine you want to build to study that particle with precision. This is very similar to running the LEP accelerator at 45 GeV per beam in order to study the 90 GeV Z boson which has the correct quantum numbers to be produced copiously at those beam energies. For that reason ILC will be in a holding pattern until the data from LHC has been analyzed. If the Higgs is there in the range predicted theoretically using global fits to precision electroweak data, then the ILC is in business. Hopefully, the R&D, funding, and international issues have been ironed out and the way has been paved to host the ILC at FNAL. This has been Fermilab's primary vision.

      Beyond the ILC, a true quantum leap at the energy frontier can only be obtained by building a much more massive machine, bigger than the SSC or ILC. Other than that it takes some technological innovation. The CLIC accelerator is what CERN envisions as the next step, where e+/e- are collided at as much as 4 TeV. It would truly be an amazing feat, but so far it looks like science fiction. FNAL is instead betting on the muon collider. Here you collide mu+ and mu- instead of e+ and e-. Because the muon is so much heavier, it can be accelerated to much high energies before it starts losing all of its energy to Bremstrahlung radiation. That means you can build a 2-4 TeV machine and still have a more cost-effective circular footprint in which the muons can make multiple passes. This is in direct contrast to the ILC where it is already recognized that the only way to get e+/e- collisions to 500 GeV is with a linear device. Also beyond that there are some physics channels where the cross-section scales as the ration of the masses-squared (m_muon/m_e)^2=(207)^2 . That means you get an extra boost of 40000 in the effective

  14. Mater-space-time? by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 1

    Mother Space-Time? Is she related to Mother Freedom? Has anyone written a song about her?

    ``The Big Bang (the Mother of all Space-Time)'' by Hotblack Desiato & Disaster Area (parental lyrics warning)

  15. Tevatron? by Radon360 · · Score: 1

    So why do we need to electrify and accelerate pairs of sandals? Do they make you shockingly fast at running with them on?

    (Yes, I know: TeV = Terra electron Volt)

    Start your groaning about a lame joke now...

    1. Re:Tevatron? by Searinox · · Score: 1

      You obviously don't: It's "Tera Electron Volt" (one r)

    2. Re:Tevatron? by Radon360 · · Score: 1

      I recognized my spelling error after I submitted. Thanks.

  16. Fembots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anyone else read this quick and see it as "FemLab" and imagine a laboratory run by fembots? Okay, I guess it was just me.

  17. Teh Ultimate Collider by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 1

    The largest earth-bound collider would be one that circles earth.

    Would anyone care to speculate on what kinds of energy levels, and what phenomena, we could investigate with a 7926 mile diameter collider?

    1. Re:Teh Ultimate Collider by azenpunk · · Score: 1

      it would likely be the best way to study budget overruns.

  18. Poorly Written by DerekLyons · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "A random blogger regurgitates PR stuff, drools over PR stuff, and can't be bothered to Google, spellcheck, or edit his writings". Would be an apt description of TFA.
     
    I long for the day when Slashdot linked to substantial material, rather than fanboi crap.

  19. pi anyone? by kwikrick · · Score: 1

    The Tevatron is really what Fermilab is known for today. From the outside, it is a gigantic ring visible through a circular hill with a length of 4 miles and a radius of one mile. Err.. 1 mile radius and 4 miles circumference? Wow, time/space is seriously deformed by all those high energy impacts!

    --
    assignment != equality != identity
    1. Re:pi anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlike the points forming a circle, this has a diameter. So I'm guessing the radius was taken from the most inward wall, but the length taken at the route traveled by the particles, which would be farther out than the inward wall.

    2. Re:pi anyone? by Bigman · · Score: 1

      Or maybe it's square? Those goofy physicists, what will they do next!

      --
      *--BigMan--- Time flies like an arrow.. but personally I prefer a nice glass of wine!
  20. Remember the collider that Bill Clinton cancelled? by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 1

    There was going to be a multi billion dollar collider in Texas(I think). It was shut down half way through production, and pissed off my physics teacher quite well.

  21. Re:Remember the collider that Bill Clinton cancell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  22. Been there a couple of times by vrmlguy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My college roommate's older brother was a physicist who worked at Fermilab. We got a tour of the place while it was at the top of its game. (He later moved to CERN; it was a bit far to visit but he had interesting stories to make up for it. On a related note, my sister married a guy who worked at Argonne National Laboratory, so I got a VIP tour there, as well.)

    Much later, during the dot-com collapse, I found myself on a job interview at Fermilab. They built a lot of custom Linux boxes and wrote a lot of software to run on them. It looked like an environment similar to Google today, with all the processing power you could imagine to throw at personal projects. At the time, you could easily download just about everything they wrote, but a lot of that disappeared after 9/11. A few people whom I trust warned that taking a government job would be a career killer for me, but the job I wound up taking paid even less. (Of course, my current job pays much better, so I guess that things even out.) Ultimately, I decided against moving my family 300 miles, but I still sometimes wish I'd taken the job.

    --
    Nothing for 6-digit uids?
  23. Welcome to Batavia: City of Energy by hedley · · Score: 1

    With a atomic orbit logo below it. They have the most memorable city motto and logo I have
    ever seen.

  24. Adventure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everything I know about computers comes from spending Saturdays there when I was in high school and playing adventure running on their systems (this was quite a long time ago). Without that experience my life would have turned out very very differently. Hopefully whatever follows FermiLab will continue to inspire students the way it inspired me (I did go to grad school in Physics and not C.S. though).

  25. Who needs fermilab? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    When we have our TV and donuts.. mmmm donuts...

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  26. Fermi Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to use Fermi Linux, similar to CentOS.

    1. Re:Fermi Linux by aalu.paneer · · Score: 1

      From Fermilinux FAQ

      Q. What is Fermi Linux LTS?
      A. Fermi Linux LTS (Long Term Support) is in essence RedHat Enterprise, recompiled.

      Though now it is based on Scientific Linux distribution.

      --
      where did my sig go? where's my sig at?
  27. it's not closing next year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most reasonable is 2009, and there is chance that the shutdown is postponed further.
    It's all dependant when the LHC experiments will start fully functional, which is not obvious at this point.

    Anyhow also with tevatron shutdown there are a lot of data to analyze in the following years (a good analysis take at least three-four years). I guess you will hear from CDF and D0 for a lot more time than 2009.

    (full-disclosure: I'm working at CDF)