Slashdot Mirror


Thieves Hacking Security Cameras?

The FBI is investigating fifteen store robberies in eleven states, committed via phone and internet. The perpetrators hack the store's security system so they can observe their victims. They then make customers take their clothes off and get the store to wire money. From the article, "A telephone caller making a bomb threat to a Hutchinson, Kan., grocery store kept more than 100 people hostage, demanding they disrobe and that the store wire money to his bank account. ... officials were investigating whether the caller was out of state and may have hacked into the store's security system. "If they can access the Internet, they can get to anything," Hutchinson Police Chief Dick Heitschmidt said. "Anyone in the whole world could have access, if that's what really happened.""

181 comments

  1. Dumber than dumb by BobTheLawyer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Has there ever been a more stupid quote than:

    "If they can access the Internet, they can get to anything," Hutchinson Police Chief Dick Heitschmidt said. "Anyone in the whole world could have access, if that's what really happened."

    1. Re:Dumber than dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not TOO far from the truth. Often the security cameras are accessible to anyone with a browser and without password protection or with a password that's ridiculously easy to guess.

    2. Re:Dumber than dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who but an Moron would comply ?

      Certainly if some $ 4.00 an hour security guard moron tells me that I must remain, I wold beat his Brains it if he tries to stop me from leaving
      You've really got to be pretty stupid to comply
      Think about it!
      Just leave the store Period !

    3. Re:Dumber than dumb by bcmm · · Score: 1

      We need to get that on T-shirts. Black T-shirts. Just to scare non-techs.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    4. Re:Dumber than dumb by KudyardRipling · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This is called a JURY POOL TAINTING STATEMENT. It is designed to predispose those eligible for jury service in the jurisdictions involved to convict by using the element of fear and terror. Whenever a statement made by law enforcement officials about an alleged criminal act is broadcast, it should be quoted in the voir dire process to screen out the rubberstampers. These are defined as those who (are carefully instructed to) worry about wives, kids, homes, SUV's entertainment systems, 401k's vacations, etc. Since the media as an institution is presumed diligent in publishing such statements, there is a presumption of contamination on the part of the jury pool. That is why one of the boilerplate questions asked by the parties in court deals with this issue of media contaminating his/her worldview or view of the defendant.

      Those who have a place in the system have no place in a jury.

      --
      Submission as evidence constitutes plaintiff and/or prosecutorial misconduct.
    5. Re:Dumber than dumb by endianx · · Score: 5, Informative

      And easily found if you know what to look for.

    6. Re:Dumber than dumb by IBBoard · · Score: 1

      Exactly what I thought. It's complete scare-mongering if you take it as it is written. It either reads as "if hackers can access the Internet then they can get to anything" which is scare-mongering over what hackers can do, or "if these cameras have a link to the Internet then the cameras can get to anything", which is complete garbage.

      What he really means is that "if the cameras have a an insecure link to the Internet then people can exploit them, just like how if a house has an insecure link to the street (e.g. an unlocked door, or a door with the keys in, or a door that needs a standard allen key to open) then the house can be entered and exploited/robbed/used".

      Ahhh, the many joys of getting technology anywhere near law enforcement and the government!

    7. Re:Dumber than dumb by LarsWestergren · · Score: 4, Funny

      Has there ever been a more stupid quote than:
      "If they can access the Internet, they can get to anything," Hutchinson Police Chief Dick Heitschmidt said. "Anyone in the whole world could have access, if that's what really happened."


      Yes. I think "No, it's not loaded! Here, I'll prove it to you!" beats it.

      --

      Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die

    8. Re:Dumber than dumb by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 3, Funny

      "hackers on steroids"
      "internet hate machine"
      Wait until these stores get dogs and curtains, than we'll be REALLY fucked.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    9. Re:Dumber than dumb by adona1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      "No, it's not loaded! Here, I'll prove it to you!"


      If only we could get Police Chief Dick Heitschmidt to say that as well ;)
      --
      Between the falling angel and the rising ape
    10. Re:Dumber than dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, yes there is:

      An unidentified man called a Newport Wal-Mart on Tuesday morning, saying he had a bomb and would harm employees. He also demanded that workers transfer $10,000 to an account, said Newport Police Sgt. James Quinn. The store wired the money, Quinn said.

      That's all it takes to make $10,000??? I think I will be expanding my retirement account this afternoon... Shhhhhhh

    11. Re:Dumber than dumb by Applekid · · Score: 1

      Whenever a statement made by law enforcement officials about an alleged criminal act is broadcast, it should be quoted in the voir dire process to screen out the rubberstampers. Even if LE watched their tongues, the media would fill in the gaps for them. They bury an "allegedly" in the text and now it's free reign to spout whatever they want, really.

      "Innocent until proven guilty" has long been gone from the mob vigilante justice world of public opinion. God help you if you're ever accused of anything.
      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    12. Re:Dumber than dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Who but an Moron would comply ?

      A nudist who's glad to have a good excuse this time? :-)
    13. Re:Dumber than dumb by brian.gunderson · · Score: 5, Funny

      You just slashdotted a whole lotta webcams.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    14. Re:Dumber than dumb by lordofthechia · · Score: 5, Funny

      From the article (Piro is the manager)....

      "He then demanded that one of Piros' fingers be cut off for every hour his demands were not met, and another employee got a butcher knife on his orders"

      Anybody wanna take bets on who was the first person fired after this incident?

      --
      Georgia Tech, the leader in Chia(tm) technology.
    15. Re:Dumber than dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's nothing. Texas is going to execute a man for being an accomplice to a murder. He was 80+ ft away when it happened and it wasn't planned (robbery). So now we're killing people simply for being there. It's gone from "an eye for an eye" to "an eye for a toe". Justice in this country is turning into terrorism.

    16. Re:Dumber than dumb by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Those would be be great names for bands.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    17. Re:Dumber than dumb by Alex+Pennace · · Score: 1

      Texas is going to execute a man for being an accomplice to a murder. He was 80+ ft away when it happened and it wasn't planned (robbery). That is still felony murder, unless you can elaborate more on the specifics of this case.
    18. Re:Dumber than dumb by CellBlock · · Score: 1

      You think Wal-Mart really misses $10k? It's easily worth that much to prevent damage to one of their stores, and I'll bet the customers in the store at the time weren't even aware that a bomb threat had been issued.

      Evacuating = loss of sales. Explosion = loss of sales. Wiring $10k while some heifer on a Rascal scooter buys at least that much worth of food = revenue. Also, they probably get reimbursed the $10k through insurance or use it as a tax writeoff or something.

    19. Re:Dumber than dumb by AdamWeeden · · Score: 1

      GP is probably referring to Kenneth Foster Jr..

      --
      I was quoted out of context in my autobiography...
    20. Re:Dumber than dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a reason any forward-looking organization does NOT negotiate with terrorists. It's like having cockroaches in your restaurant. There are one or two at first, and you don't kill them because having a crew come out would be visible, and make you look bad. Before you know it, there are hundreds, then thousands, and you have a REAL problem instead of just a handful of small ones.

    21. Re:Dumber than dumb by 5KVGhost · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't see anything controversial about that case. If you actively participate in a violent crime and someone dies then you're just as responsible as the person who pulls the trigger. Don't want to be responsible for a murder? Then don't be a getaway driver for a gang of doped up armed robbers. It's not difficult.

    22. Re:Dumber than dumb by CellBlock · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You're right, but this isn't about "any forward-looking organization," it's about Wal-Mart, a company that has decided that prosecuting shoplifters isn't worth their time unless they're stealing a lot.

      They'd probably harbor a sleeper cell in the loading dock as long as their supply chain of cheap Chinese crap doesn't slow down.

    23. Re:Dumber than dumb by JazzLad · · Score: 1
      --
      "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
    24. Re:Dumber than dumb by dillee1 · · Score: 1

      They don't even need to hack any camera. Just put a teammate in the shop. He would carries a hidden cam which act as the extorter's eye. Additionally he can help drive up mass hysteria inside the customers, which aids the extorter getting whatever he wants.

    25. Re:Dumber than dumb by crashfrog · · Score: 1

      Don't want to be responsible for a murder? Then don't be a getaway driver for a gang of doped up armed robbers. It's not difficult.

      Not driving a guy away from a murder nobody had any idea he was going to commit doesn't make anybody less dead. Of course it might make you dead - a guy who just killed someone a second ago isn't somebody I'd say "sorry, you're on your own" to.

      So explain to me again how that guy is responsible? Like, responsible enough to be killed by the state for it?

      --
      I never have frustrations, the reason is, to wit:
      If at first I don't succeed, I quit!
    26. Re:Dumber than dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is why I don't have any IP cameras. I use the digital closed circuit wired for my camera system at home to monitor any idiots that try to do anything to my home. Thinking of that if you have your cameras on the ethernet based network would that still be "closed circuit" or open?

    27. Re:Dumber than dumb by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      They'd probably harbor a sleeper cell in the loading dock as long as their supply chain of cheap Chinese crap doesn't slow down.

      Why not, I seem to remember a homeless college student spending a couple of days in one of their stores once.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    28. Re:Dumber than dumb by yada21 · · Score: 1

      He was providing assistance to the person who did it. Plus, commonality of purpose.

      --
      I will have a sig when the market demands it.
    29. Re:Dumber than dumb by Enlarged+to+Show+Tex · · Score: 1

      What do you expect? This is Kansas we're talking about here, the land of folks who keep wanting intelligent design taught in their schools...

    30. Re:Dumber than dumb by Sardonic1 · · Score: 1

      So this is the guy who thought that Mitnick could launch WWIII with a payphone? Was the store stupid enough to use security camera's on X10?

    31. Re:Dumber than dumb by DrVomact · · Score: 1

      If they can access the Internet, they can get to anything

      Great Caesar's ghost! I'm Superman!

      --
      Great men are almost always bad men--Lord Acton's Corollary
    32. Re:Dumber than dumb by hax0r_this · · Score: 2, Informative

      The governor just commuted his sentence to life:
      http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/tx/5095674. html

    33. Re:Dumber than dumb by crashfrog · · Score: 1

      He was providing assistance to the person who did it.

      And, in your opinion, that merits a death sentence? I still don't see how it does.

      --
      I never have frustrations, the reason is, to wit:
      If at first I don't succeed, I quit!
    34. Re:Dumber than dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wait until these stores get dogs and curtains, than we'll be REALLY fucked.

      Judging by your e-mail address, it might be the other way around, unfortunately.

  2. LOL WUT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What kind of retarded security system puts the live security cameras on the internet? It's like a bad Holywood plot. I'm not buying it.

    1. Re:LOL WUT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of retarded security system puts the live security cameras on the internet? It's like a bad Holywood plot. I'm not buying it.

      Of course you're not buying it. You get it through BitTorrent. :-)
  3. Duh by nlitement · · Score: 1, Informative

    It's called "Google hacking", you do it by searching with secret undergound hacker keywords and finding open remote camera viewer applets. Some applets even let you control the camera.

    1. Re:Duh by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1, Funny

      d00d! 1t t0ta11y w0rk3d!!! 1 g00gl3d 4 s3cur1ty c4mz n i t0t4lly pwn3d th3m! C? !!!

    2. Re:Duh by BlueTrin · · Score: 1

      Somebody sue google ... fast ...

      --
      Don't you know it is now both immoral and criminal to think beyond the next quarterly report?
    3. Re:Duh by TapeCutter · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You wouldn't happen to know the "secret undergound hacker keywords" to the womens locker room would you, I've tried everything but the free webcam links I find seem to be in some kind of loop that requires either a reboot or a real credit card number to exit. Every time it happens I have to spend hours on the phone with the stupid internet managers at the phone company who think my machine runs some DoS program. I told them I run Linux too and they said it means "denial of service", I stood up to them and said that was unconstitutional and they backed down and said if I reinstall everything they will let me have my old account and email address. /desperate & dateless

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    4. Re:Duh by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Mostly it's incompetent IT and store managers that have installed panasonic IP cameras and left them not only wide open but on the internet because the store managers are retarted and want to spend their life watching the employees.

      ALL of this stuff goes right back to raging incompetence. It's incredible how little these stores pay for IT, I had to teach the IT specialists for Walmart how to do basic networking when we were helping a client set up their network for their restaurant inside a new walmart store. The Walmart head of networking, or so he claimed to be, told me it was impossible to tunnel IP traffic safely through a network, no. he did not understand what a VPN was and then told me that VPN is not allowed as it's insecure and unencrypted!.... and then I had to hold their hands and show them how easy is really is to patch a phone line to a cat 5 jack in the phone room. Their network engineer told me flat out that DSL will not work over cat-5e cable. "The phone company uses Cat6 to your house!" is what he said. I was amazed at how undereducated these IT and networking people were.

      With that kind of incompetence due to very low pay, it does not surprise me that security cameras are put on the net directly.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:Duh by CmdrGravy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Have you tried

      "Hi, I am ze plumber. I haf com to examine ze pipework, ver can I place my tooool ? It is ver huge and I can't keep it in here much longer"

    6. Re:Duh by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's no wonder. What happens here is the combination of some unhealthy factors.

      1. The cheapest guy gets the job. Now, the cheapest is never the best, and rarely even good enough to actually do it good.
      2. As soon as it "works", stop working on it. As soon as the picture somehow appears on the screen of the manager, he's satisfied. He does not care about whether someone else can see it. If he is, his wannabe-admin will lie to him because he'd have to fix it in his (unpaid) overtime and the manager can't test it anyway.
      3. The admin does not care. Even if he did (and why the hell should he?), he cannot. He does not know what dangers lurk in the shadows. He goes by try and error to patch the thing together somehow, i.e. he runs into an error, copy/pastes the error message into Google and goes from there.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:Duh by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 1

      someone should mod you up.

      Yep and this is very old news. I recall when the thing originally came out I tried a few links and was looking at Japanese Streets, stores and vets offices. Not to mention someones living room. The best one was some old folks home where they had the camera set up that you could zoom into each room in the buildings across the street and actually read the papers people were reading.

      Less to do with hacking and more do with people using technology they have no idea how to set up to be private.

    8. Re:Duh by jrmcferren · · Score: 1

      The first time I had ever done it, I did not have to use google. I simply went to my network places and bam it was there.

      --
      sudo mod me up
    9. Re:Duh by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 1

      With that kind of incompetence due to very low pay, it does not surprise me that security cameras are put on the net directly.


      It isn't due to low pay. It is just IT in general. This whole industry is overflowing with incompetent morons. I've encountered web designers who don't know what a CSS class is; programmers who think client-side Javascript is sufficient input validation; network people who think apache web sites necessarily run on a different port number... Many of them make decent money (often at large, bloated, companies).
    10. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mostly it's incompetent IT and store managers that have installed panasonic IP cameras and left them not only wide open but on the internet because the store managers are retarted and want to spend their life watching the employees.
      It's spelled retarded, you retard.
    11. Re:Duh by multisync · · Score: 1

      Somebody sue google ... fast ...


      I'm sure when the city of Tuttle OK's traffic cams start pointing at random subjects, Jerry Taylor will threaten to call the FBI again.
      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    12. Re:Duh by badc0ffee · · Score: 1

      ... and then I had to hold their hands and show them how easy is really is to patch a phone line to a cat 5 jack in the phone room. Their network engineer told me flat out that DSL will not work over cat-5e cable. "The phone company uses Cat6 to your house!" is what he said. I was amazed at how undereducated these IT and networking people were.

      Shame on you for not educating him by putting an extra twist in that cat5 cable to make it cat6 so it would work :-)

      --
      1011 1010 1101 1100 0000 1111 1111 1110 1110
  4. Hacking security cameras, huh? by EveryNickIsTaken · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm sure Jack Thompson will blame this on BioShock.

    1. Re:Hacking security cameras, huh? by Lurker2288 · · Score: 1

      Just wait until modded-up splicers start frying clerks with their electricity plasmids, then you'll see some action.

    2. Re:Hacking security cameras, huh? by zurmikopa · · Score: 1

      I went to the comments and searched for "bio" *specifically* to see if this comment had already been made.

  5. Voyeurism + Crank Calls = Profit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    /b/ does robbery.

    Now THAT'S what I call social engineering.

    1. Re:Voyeurism + Crank Calls = Profit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was talking about E/b/aum's world. What are YOU talking about?

  6. "wire money to his bank account"? by TheLink · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Can't they follow the money trail from there?

    Strange.

    --
    1. Re:"wire money to his bank account"? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Informative

      That depends on what country the bank account is in. In some countries, bank accounts can't necessarily be tracked back to the owner, they are secured only by a really, really fscking long account number.

    2. Re:"wire money to his bank account"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      That depends on what country the bank account is in. In some countries, bank accounts can't necessarily be tracked back to the owner, they are secured only by a really, really fscking long account number.

      In civilized countries, bank accounts are always tracked back to the owner. Even in Switzerland, Luxembourg, Liechtenstein, etc. They are required to do so by the FATF and the OECD.

      Whether the bank will cooperate is another story. Swiss banks will cooperate in cases of serious crime, if the offense is a crime in Switzerland. This case sounds like it would be a crime in Switzerland.

      However, tax evasion is not a serious crime in Switzerland, so a Swiss bank will not cooperate when investigating tax evasion. This is one reason Swiss banks are so popular with foreigners.

    3. Re:"wire money to his bank account"? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Who said anything about Switzerland? I'm talking about Panama and Singapore.

    4. Re:"wire money to his bank account"? by Eponymous+Bastard · · Score: 1

      Or maybe track the phone call?

      (yeah yeah, everyone wants to be James Bond and doesn't care for old-school solutions)

    5. Re:"wire money to his bank account"? by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      And don't forget the banks in the Bahamas.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    6. Re:"wire money to his bank account"? by fmoliveira · · Score: 1

      Such countries should be excluded from the banking system.

    7. Re:"wire money to his bank account"? by avronius · · Score: 1

      Well...

      Pay-per-use cellular phones would be difficult to trace (although chances are good that you could at least narrow it down to the right area code...)
      Any thoughts on how easy it would be to trace an IP telephone based call? I'm pretty sure that there are enough proxies out there to make this a nightmare in and of itself.

      Some things just aren't as easy as they might seem...

    8. Re:"wire money to his bank account"? by TheLink · · Score: 1

      "Pay-per-use cellular phones would be difficult to trace"

      Well they should know which cell you're calling from, and if the culprit is stupid enough to leave the phone on (usually), the tech is there to catch the culprit, get one of those "radar vans" head to area where phone is, then "ping" the phone.

      But of course the FBI etc are too busy chasing down terrorists.

      --
    9. Re:"wire money to his bank account"? by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Even with all that mass eavesdropping by the US Gov this guy still manages to get up to _fifteen_?

      Phone calls, access to online security cams and bank transactions all leave a much easier trail to follow than some guy in a black leather + full face motorcycle helmet robbing your shop (taking cash only) and then zooming off who knows where on a stolen fast bike.

      --
    10. Re:"wire money to his bank account"? by avronius · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall that you need at least 3 cell towers to triangulate a user's location. In a densely populated area, there would likely be more cell towers than in a suburban location. Walking around in an area with a larger number of cellular towers would cause a great deal of signal 'bounce' - moving from tower to tower - and would likely make tracing the call a bit more difficult.

      Disclaimer: Everything that I know about how cell phones work is 2nd or 3rd hand, having no industry experience myself.

    11. Re:"wire money to his bank account"? by TheLink · · Score: 1

      1) You know which cell a phone is "in". So you know which area that person is likely to be in.
      2) In densely populated areas, cells would normally be small.
      3) In "hard to cover areas" you might even know which carpark or lift shaft the person was in.
      4) You can even guess if they are travelling in a vehicle especially if it is moving from cell to cell.

      For vaguely related information see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Handoff

      So once you've narrowed down which area that person is in, you bring in the "radar vans" and cops to catch the person (you need much better resolution to catch the person).

      I suggest that many crimes could be solved if police had access to records of phone numbers, the cells they were in and the times they were in those cells. Most current criminals may not be smart enough to turn off their phones _way_ before committing a crime.

      You do not even need to record the phone conversations, but of course that could be useful as well.

      --
  7. Get the RIAA in on the case! by threaded · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why don't these stores copyright their video feed and then let loose the RIAA on the perps. That'll stop 'em!

    1. Re:Get the RIAA in on the case! by djones101 · · Score: 2, Funny

      That would be the MPAA. RIAA would be if the store's music that is constantly interrupted by screaming cashiers showed up on the Internet.

    2. Re:Get the RIAA in on the case! by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      No. They should post the video on YouTube and when Viacom uses it in a VH1 segment, they'll get sued.

    3. Re:Get the RIAA in on the case! by Agripa · · Score: 1

      The eighth amendment forbids cruel and unusual punishment.

  8. Is the footage on YouTube? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Funny

    He did not record the security camera footage and upload it to You Tube? Dumb idiot. This is what dumbing down of America has done to the respectable profession of robbery.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Is the footage on YouTube? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what dumbing down of America has done to the respectable profession of n00bery.


      There, fixed that for you.
  9. CCTV by Recovering+Hater · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why are the security cameras on anything other than a closed circuit? It makes no sense for their cameras to be connected to the internet.

    --
    My humor is probably your flamebait
    1. Re:CCTV by MyLongNickName · · Score: 4, Funny

      How else do you outsource your security work to India?

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    2. Re:CCTV by Skapare · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why are the security cameras on anything other than a closed circuit? It makes no sense for their cameras to be connected to the internet.

      Many companies are cutting back on security staff by eliminating in-store people that watch the TV screens. The stores still have some roving security people, but the TV screen watching is now more automated, more centralized, and in some cases even pushed out to homes where people with broadband can be paid even less than the in-store people to sit and watch a bunch of TV camera images for hours, looking for suspect people.

      It might be interesting if someone developed a way to fool those systems into thinking someone is watching (frequently clicking to see the next camera).

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    3. Re:CCTV by Egonis · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I run a security consulting business, and one of the things we do is CCTV Camera Systems.

      Most of our clients are hell-bent on having internet access so that they can remotely view and control their cameras, card access systems, and PA systems.

      Although it is possible to hack these systems, it is a remote chance if configured properly like anything else.

      My guess is that these incidents are with default usernames and passwords on the DVR and other equipment.

      However, my question is: how did they find the IP of a target store?
      It's one thing to want to rob a store, but it's another to know this type of sensitive information.
      And in many cases, even large stores are using DSL or Cable where they get a dynamic IP.

      Sounds like an inside job to me.

    4. Re:CCTV by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      Why are the security cameras on anything other than a closed circuit? It makes no sense for their cameras to be connected to the internet.

      I don't know that they actually are interwebbed, but if they were, it would be to save money over having a dedicated line for every store. The Dillons stores are owned by Kroger now, so home office is hundreds of miles away.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    5. Re:CCTV by canUbeleiveIT · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Last year we put a security camera system into a auto recycling yard using IP cameras. They had been suffering a rash of after-hours breakins to steal the platinum that is in old catalytic converters. The system recorded to a DVR, but also was hooked to motion sensors that, when activated, would call the manager's cell phone, as well as start pitching still shots across the internet to a remote ftp server.

      Two weeks after installation, the thieves broke in. When they saw the cameras and the DVR, they set fire to the place to destroy the evidence, but the still photos were enough to identify and convict them. They haven't had a problem since.

    6. Re:CCTV by ccguy · · Score: 1

      Why are the security cameras on anything other than a closed circuit? It makes no sense for their cameras to be connected to the internet.
      What do you mean? In every movie the hacker can access all camaras at all places, worldwide. How would they do it otherwise? :-)
    7. Re:CCTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're assuming they targetted that specific store. I imagine they stumbled across the store whilst scanning blocks of IPs.

    8. Re:CCTV by Ajehals · · Score: 4, Funny

      They haven't had a problem since. Is that on account of no longer having a business as it was destroyed by fire?
    9. Re:CCTV by Gandalf_the_Beardy · · Score: 1

      It's easy - most of the cameras have a default control page. You just Google for that keyword and it' will often return lots of hits of cameras with webservers that are exposed to the internet- say that $CAMERAMAKER has a default webpage of http://camerasite/view?control=mode-on

      Just google for the keyword control=mode-on and you will get tons of hits for that camera from all over the page.

    10. Re:CCTV by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      However, my question is: how did they find the IP of a target store?

      In the olden days of modem-connected monitoring equipment, we called it "war dialing". What do the kids call it now, "war surfing"? Start at 0.0.0.0 and increment through FF.FF.FF.FF, excluding local nets if you like, and see if anything responds like a "Brand X" security camera.

      But if they did that, how would they have determined the actual store location to get a phone number? Perhaps instead of an inside job, it was a bluff, and they didn't have camera access at all.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    11. Re:CCTV by ptbarnett · · Score: 3, Informative
      Why are the security cameras on anything other than a closed circuit? It makes no sense for their cameras to be connected to the internet.

      Read further in TFA:

      Initially, the caller led employees to believe he was observing them.

      "After a while, it sounded like he was just taking a shot in the dark at what they might be doing, or what they looked like or how they were reacting to his call," Prescott police Lt. Ken Morley said.

    12. Re:CCTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are the security cameras on anything other than a closed circuit?

      They were designed by Diebold?

    13. Re:CCTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why risk your life for a low paying Job?
      Just Get out of the store call the police on cellphone Outside Didn't any of them think of that ?
      I would love to hear why the employees simply didn't GFO (get Out )

      Please we need to hear from the 100 in the store , why didn't they leave ?
      Why did they comply ?

    14. Re:CCTV by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Although it is possible to hack these systems, it is a remote chance if configured properly like anything else.

      They rarely are. as a Technology specialist company that also does cameras, we find that 9 times out fo ten the default passwords are set for the administration access of the DVR and even the IP cameras.

      Out of the last 35 jobsites over 30 of them still had defaults set that would allow access in one way or another. Yes these were installed by "professional companies". some of them had administrator password changed but the guest / user account was still wide open.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    15. Re:CCTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha you're an idiot. An IP address as "sensitive information"? You win todays "no clue what the fuck I'm talking about" award.

    16. Re:CCTV by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Please we need to hear from the 100 in the store , why didn't they leave ?
      Why did they comply ?


            Because the general public have been indoctrinated into thinking that a) there are "terrorists" EVERYWHERE, especially in the parking lot outside the store, and b) of course you always do what the perpetrator wants, and then he'll let you go, right?

            Oh, and the rest just wanted to see everyone else naked.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    17. Re:CCTV by Joebert · · Score: 1

      The cameras in the Subway (sandwich stores) my brother worked at years ago are wired to the internet.
      Knowing that his boss could see what he was doing at any given moment, my brother didn't slack off much at that store.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    18. Re:CCTV by Joebert · · Score: 0

      Thanks, that was fucking hilarious.
      I'll be laughing all day about that one.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    19. Re:CCTV by Yoozer · · Score: 1

      and in some cases even pushed out to homes where people with broadband can be paid even less
      Sucks if that person's walking with their dog for 3 minutes or so while a robbery is in progress. There's a reason you leave it to at least folks who have trained for it; the chance that they'll slack off in the store is smaller. At least, that's what I hope.
    20. Re:CCTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Well as this seems to work, we can now outsource our crime to India also.

    21. Re:CCTV by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      That works as long as you don't have a real incident. The response time for the teams to arrive are awefully long, and now they started to charge by the mile.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    22. Re:CCTV by tommyatomic · · Score: 0

      I did alot of security work specificly with Security DVRs of a variety of brands. 3 things to consider 1. It is not hard to scan for the dvrs with a port scanner. Same with ip cameras. 2. Most people think that the default login/password is ok to leave in place(idiots). 3. If you watch a video feed long enough you can probably figure out where you are watching and then look up the phone number. These guys if they are cracking into video surveilence. It does not take any kind of genius. It barely takes a 5th grade education. The same sort of high class intelect that 419 scams are based on. Be afraid of 5th graders claiming to be exiled royalty needing assistance to secure hidden assets on a video feed in a grocery store with a bomb.

    23. Re:CCTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It might be interesting if someone developed a way to fool those systems into thinking someone is watching (frequently clicking to see the next camera)."

      Homer used a dipping bird. I'm sure the technology could be adapted.

    24. Re:CCTV by Tofystedeth · · Score: 1

      Because they were told by a guy they believed was watching them that there was a bomb in the store and if they tried to leave, he would blow it up. Even if there wasn't a bomb, there have in the past been bombs put in places. It's enough to make them reluctant to call his bluff.

      --
      "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. Drink deeply or not at all."
    25. Re:CCTV by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Oh, and the rest just wanted to see everyone else naked.

      (Overheard during the robbery) "Ummm, did he say he wanted us to strip? Everything? Oh, just shirts. Ok. Sure he didn't mean underwear also? Sure? Because I will if he insists. I'm willing to do it. I'll get totally naked. Would he like us to dance real sexy-like also? Is that a security camera? Can it see me right now?..."

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    26. Re:CCTV by CmdrSammo · · Score: 1

      This store has their security cameras on a "camera" sub-domain...so pretty easy to find methinks! http://eskc.com/ http://camera.eskc.com/index4.html

    27. Re:CCTV by ralphclintellis · · Score: 2, Informative

      According to current reports, the claim that the cameras were compromised was withdrawn.

    28. Re:CCTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should've splurged on a sprinkler system also.

    29. Re:CCTV by Altus · · Score: 1


      Well websites often figure out what town I am in based on my IP address. If you knew that and you knew it was, say, a 7-11 based on the promo materials visible, you could just call around to all the 7-11s in that town (one, maybe two) until you see the clerk on the camera answer your call. Then your in business.

      Even if you didn't know it was a 7-11 a Google search of continence stores would provide a fairly short list.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    30. Re:CCTV by Fox_1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Mod Parent up - this was actually withdrawn yesterday - the cops spread at little FUD with their Internet Hackers working the Security Camera Comments - but now they have backed off on this statement, particularly since the Hutchinson Incident was caused by locals who have been taken into custody.
      see here
      Oh and no bombs have ever been found, there are a lot of embarrassed people out there who have really overreacted to these 'menacing & scary' phone calls.

      --
      The rock, the vulture, and the chain
    31. Re:CCTV by Jeremi · · Score: 1
      Because they were told by a guy they believed was watching them that there was a bomb in the store and if they tried to leave, he would blow it up. Even if there wasn't a bomb, there have in the past been bombs put in places. It's enough to make them reluctant to call his bluff.


      Wasn't this the plot to "Die Hard", or something? Besides, I thought that post-9/11 we were all supposed to assume that the "terrists" will kill us no matter what, and not to bother trying to appease them.... :^P

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    32. Re:CCTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing wrong with enabling systems for remote access. BUT, there is something hugely wrong with the way it was done in this case(obviously). Simple way is to create a quality firewalled, VPN connection to the entity (corporate HQ or outsourced security firm). Cameras, etc., get only private IPs, and monitoring entity gets access via the secured VPN to that private IP network. They can monitor just fine, yet the outside world cannot. Simple.

      Anonymous because I'm to fuggin lazy to register...

    33. Re:CCTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "continence stores" heh heh I think you meant to say "incontinence stores" -- I'm running over there now before I'm out of Depends.

    34. Re:CCTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Human response to danger ?
      It's GFO.Self preservation
      If I though there was a bomb there for real and some ass tried to stop me from leaving, he may be killed , Not deliberately but if he is in my way he is going to suffer Broken bones and injures if he tries to stop me

      Learn a little about the human life preservation circuits and how real men handles danger
      It cant be controlled by jackass lawyers judges and laws
      A store managers tells me to stay n a dangerous situation ? Bullshit if he's in my way he's going down and god help him! If your a man ,protect your Woman first and self second thats my Motto
      But a weenie ? in a danger situation Knocked to the ground as important to me as dog poop on my shoe!

    35. Re:CCTV by Tofystedeth · · Score: 1

      So you're saying that if you honestly thought there was enough credibility in the bomb threat to seriously injure a fellow hostage in an attempt to get out, that you think running away like a pussy even when the bomber said he would blow up the very building you and possibly your family and friends and 100 other people are in is somehow both safer and more "manly" than sitting it out and not needlessly endangering yourself and others? Wow, what a run-on.

      --
      "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. Drink deeply or not at all."
    36. Re:CCTV by plexium_nerd · · Score: 1

      easy

      http://1.1.1.1/ .... "Lois? Damn!"

      http://1.1.1.2/ .... "Lois? Damn!"

      http://1.1.1.3/ ....

      --
      ____ plex
    37. Re:CCTV by Nitack · · Score: 1

      No bombs were found, but if you were the bank manager and an unidentified voice on the phone said that a bomb would blow up if money was not wired with in five minutes or if anyone tried to leave what would you do?

      You could ignore it yes, most likely false. But what if its not? Its easy to say they are idiots when your not in their positions.

      Your reaction can really only be tested when you are in that position. I know of plenty of Marines who pissed themselves the first time a shot was fired in their direction while in Iraq. How many of them do you think would have considered it a possibility before it actually happened?

    38. Re:CCTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google: Axis 2100 Network Camera

      The world is now yours.

    39. Re:CCTV by Fox_1 · · Score: 1
      Hey I could ignore it, I guess, but if I was in their positions I would have prepared an emergency response plan that includes response to bomb threats in addition to the usual of theft, medical crisis and fire. The place I would go to get started on that plan might be somewhere like here.

      If I followed the directions in that document it would be unlikely that my employees would be running around with butcher knives threatening my fingers, while 100 fat middle aged Americans got naked on the floor.

      That document outlines 3 reactions - the third being the one you didn't mention - search and then decide on evacuation. It also outlines the fundamentals of establishing a chain of command that is able to communicate effectively with police and bombers. It describes the requirements for search and evacuation teams in order to execute on the plan. But hey what do I know?

      On a side note, you said:
      You could ignore it yes, most likely false. But what if its not? Its easy to say they are idiots when you're not in their positions.
      I said 'embarrassed people'. I didn't call anyone an idiot...idiot.

      --
      The rock, the vulture, and the chain
    40. Re:CCTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lets see
      A $ 19 K a year retail manager tells everyone to disrobe and being that almost all bomb threats in the USA so far are false the law of averages are on your side

      here's some number
      99.9% of all bomb threats - false
      99.9 % of most retail mangement low paid fools
      99.9 % of what police, media and ;politicians tell us is bullshit

      Under this, I would get the hell out Just in case it the other .1 %

    41. Re:CCTV by KudyardRipling · · Score: 1

      Ethnic lightning, anyone?

      --
      Submission as evidence constitutes plaintiff and/or prosecutorial misconduct.
    42. Re:CCTV by Torvaun · · Score: 1

      Every place I've worked, policy has been, "If they claim they have a bomb, you do what they tell you to do." Suppose they actually did have a bomb, and they blew it up when you didn't do what they said. The store is now liable for a shitload of lawsuits from the victims' families. Not to mention you're dead.

      Wal-Mart would send the money. Taco Bell would send the money. Any place that had the option of sending the money would send the money. You could take the case off an old digital clock, put the whole thing in a suitcase, and threaten them with that, and you would get the money. When a McDonalds manager decides to strip search an employee based on an anonymous phone call, you know that you can get away with anything.

      --
      I see your informative link, and raise you a pithy comment.
    43. Re:CCTV by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, if they *had* found a bomb...

      Does it really make sense to risk the lives of tens or hundreds of customers just to call a bluff? I would draw the line at violence against another person (or myself for that matter), but ten grand of corporate funds? Who cares? "Here's the money, have a nice day," then call the cops when it's over. It's nothing to be embarrassed about; they did the right thing.

  10. I was fooled too by clovis · · Score: 4, Funny

    My wife came in a found me sitting on the floor in my underwear. I had only skimmed the slashdot article and thought that it was a disrobe-or-get-bombed threat against me. It seems that the Slashdot is only _reporting_ a bomb threat and isn't actually going to blow us up.
    Also, would CowboyNeal please send back my $3,000?

  11. Why CCTV is on the internet by G4from128k · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's a valid question. Companies put security cameras on the internet to enable remote recording and control. It lets the central office or outsourced security firm handle all the digital video and dispatch police/fire services from a cost-efficient central location. If you owned 100 convenience stores in 10 states, where would you put the security office and how would you link them?

    Rather than build a dedicated hardwired telecom network, companies are using the internet to connect everything together (security systems, financial systems, medical records, industrial control, etc.) As we can see from this example, they think they've created their own virtual network (of some degree of privacy), but in practice, the system is extremely vulnerable. I'd bet that more than a few internet-connected security cameras run with factory-default passwords.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:Why CCTV is on the internet by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      I'd bet that more than a few internet-connected security cameras run with factory-default passwords.

      And even if they change it, there's still the "Joshua" back door.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    2. Re:Why CCTV is on the internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd bet that more than a few internet-connected security cameras run with factory-default passwords.

      A simple solution to that would be if the cams as delivered would be restricted to the password changing function until you did exactly that.
  12. Sparks by Renraku · · Score: 1

    This could be one of the first, and certainly not the last, case of people using security devices against the people whom they were designed to protect.

    How are those net-enabled security cameras working out for you?

    --
    Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    1. Re:Sparks by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 1

      How are those net-enabled security cameras working out for you?

      Fine, I just coupled a HTTP-controlled shotgun to the ones I have in my home.

    2. Re:Sparks by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2, Funny

      link?

    3. Re:Sparks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't think so... How many have been shot by the gun they bought to protect themselves?

      If you buy any means to protect yourself, learn how to control and use it or it might/will be used against you.

  13. Internet security system .. by rs232 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "officials were investigating whether the caller was out of state and may have hacked into the store's security system"

    "If they can access the Internet, they can get to anything"

    "Anyone in the whole world could have access, if that's what really happened"

    What kind of idiot would connect the security system to the Internet so that 'they' could get to anything. Didn't they put it on a private VPN or use a password even?

    "The FBI was looking into whether the calls to the banks and stores were being placed from overseas"

    I thought DCSNet was designed to provide instant access to such information. Provides absolutly no evidence of any such hacking. Sounds to me like a low level extortion plot apart from the mention of the (scary) Internet and hackers (even more scary). Since when do sophisticated thieves use Western Union and wire themselves $3,000 with a $150 service charge. Who paid the charge I wonder.

    We get bomb threats here all the time, so don't take any notice ...

    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
    1. Re:Internet security system .. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Since when do sophisticated thieves use Western Union and wire themselves $3,000 with a $150 service charge.

      That practice is old, tried and proven. It's been used by banking trojan users for at the very least two years now. You have a trojan'd computer, hire gullible people to provide their accounts, use the trojan to transfer money to the account, the account holder then uses WU to send you the money.

      Easy, anonymous and hard to track. Works like a dream.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Internet security system .. by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      What kind of idiot would connect the security system to the Internet so that 'they' could get to anything. Didn't they put it on a private VPN or use a password even? Your average ordinary idiot. People don't understand when they connect that wire... they are connected to "planet earth". They really don't. Even Axis cameras don't come with a default robot.txt on their cameras.
      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  14. Funny by p3d0 · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the laugh.

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  15. Cats Pets Donau City Strasse .. by rs232 · · Score: 1

    You mean like this one ...

    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
  16. "hacked" by simply using Google? by Speare · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There are many store monitor camera systems that are installed with poor defaults and wide open access. Several makers' web interfaces have easy formulaic URLs to select different store views, and these commonly can be searched with plain old web search engines. This was a fun thing to do a few years back, with whole sites dedicated to lists of web cams that were likely not intended for global viewership. Without any real evidence that the web cameras were "hacked" I think it's a big stretch to assume any skill was involved here.

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
    1. Re:"hacked" by simply using Google? by rs232 · · Score: 1
      --
      davecb5620@gmail.com
    2. Re:"hacked" by simply using Google? by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      Priceless. I caught a girl looking in the general direction of the camera, so I centered it on her. She turned around and started walking away, so I panned the camera to follow her. Sure made her hurry up!

    3. Re:"hacked" by simply using Google? by rs232 · · Score: 1

      You should have seen the coverage of Stuttgart Airport, pretty dumb to leave them wide open ..

      --
      davecb5620@gmail.com
  17. IP sensitive? by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

    However, my question is: how did they find the IP of a target store? It's one thing to want to rob a store, but it's another to know this type of sensitive information. IPs are about as sensitive as a street address. Send an email to the store's staff about any stupid thing that would warrant a reply, get an IP back in the headers. Or just give them a web link to click, or an email that takes advantage of crappy Outlook and auto-loads something from your own webspace, and wait for the hit. Either way, you end up with a nice IP range to scan out in exchange for minimal effort.
  18. Another law broken? by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm sure that in some states, 100 naked people in a store legally counts as an orgy.

    1. Re:Another law broken? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better pray that the on-site local store in your nudist camp isn't wildly successful, then!

    2. Re:Another law broken? by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that in some states, 100 naked people in a store legally counts as an orgy. And in Texas, possessing more than three dildos gets you arrested for "intent to distribute." Bill O'Reilly had better watch his ass in Texas.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  19. In other news... by dark-br · · Score: 3, Informative

    People are stupid. Google for: inurl:"ViewerFrame?Mode="

    And have fun...

    1. Re:In other news... by lordofthechia · · Score: 1

      Sweet, I now get the public plaza channel and the auto shop channel!

      --
      Georgia Tech, the leader in Chia(tm) technology.
    2. Re:In other news... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Report to your nearest police office and turn yourself in for publishing hacking tools.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:In other news... by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      I like the remote control cameras. I once played with googling for them and finding unsecured control webapps. One time I kept scanning a camera around but it would start to move back. I was wondering if the owner was trying to keep it from moving ("This thing has a mind of its own!") or if other people had found it and were also screwing around.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    4. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google
        Error

              We're sorry... ... but your query looks similar to automated requests from a computer virus or spyware application. To protect our users, we can't process your request right now.

              We'll restore your access as quickly as possible, so try again soon. In the meantime, if you suspect that your computer or network has been infected, you might want to run a virus checker or spyware remover to make sure that your systems are free of viruses and other spurious software.

              We apologize for the inconvenience, and hope we'll see you again on Google.

  20. Wireless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    However, my question is: how did they find the IP of a target store?
    It's one thing to want to rob a store, but it's another to know this type of sensitive information.


    In my WarDriving travels, I've come apon many SSID-hidden wireless networks around stores. Sometimes they aren't even encrypted. My recent curiosity with these nets reveals a few wifi networked cameras in some locations, and sometimes if you log into these networks, you can find a nat. From there it's simply accessing a site that gives you a IP.

    But why bother when you already have access to there cameras via a unsecured access point?

    Anonymous for obvious reasons.
  21. They were asking for this... by cablepokerface · · Score: 2, Funny

    I usually have Security Expert I & II equipped, so I have significantly less alarm and overload tiles. Every camera I see I take a few pictures of because then I can see the 'weaknesses' of the camera.

    Of course when I have positioned myself directly under the camera I can't see me anymore and if it hangs too high I can just jump up and finish my hack in mid air.

    Unfortunatly, the guards are a bitch. For them it always seems to be "bring your daugther to work day".

    Other then that, hacking cameras is a breeze, like I said, with just a simple minigame they are asking for it.

  22. I used to do that in Deus Ex all the time! by Loosifur · · Score: 0

    Meanwhile, I'm glad that the video feed is secured by passwords as strong as "admin" or my favorite "1234". Sometimes they throw a "5" on there for added security...(it's Comcastic!)

    --
    This unbiased moderation brought to you by the Porcine Aviation Group!
  23. Why were they made to disrobe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ignoring the funny side of it, why were the customers made to disrobe?

    I can't begin to imagine a real reason at all here. I very much doubt that you seek titillation while carrying out a heist, and I don't think there was anyone present to gather in the wallets, nor was this to disarm potential gun carriers.

    There's something very strange about this event.

    The only thing that comes to mind is insanity, lol. Which I guess is quite possible.

    1. Re:Why were they made to disrobe? by Random832 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Probably testing the waters (i.e. make sure they're intimidated into doing whatever the thieves say) before giving them bank account information to do the wire transfers.

      --
      We've secretly replaced Slashdot with new Folgers Crystals - let's see if it notices.
    2. Re:Why were they made to disrobe? by Alexpkeaton1010 · · Score: 1

      Maybe the criminal only robs stores with cute employees?

    3. Re:Why were they made to disrobe? by Kazrath · · Score: 1

      Forcing people into the Nude is one of the easiest forms of terrorism. Why do you think people blush... They are embarrassed and feel out of place. It will cause them to focus on this embarrassment and miss alot of other detail. It also will make them more plyable to suggestion as their minds will start wondering "Whats next bad thing that is going to happen to me?".

      This tactic was employed by the Germans during WWII it worked pretty well for them.

  24. YOU FUCKING LOVE IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    inurl:/view/index.shtml
    inurl:"ViewerFrame?Mode="
    inurl:netw_tcp.shtml
    intitle:"supervisioncam protocol"
    inurl:CgiStart?page=Single
    inurl:index Frame.shtml?newstyle=Quad
    intitle:liveapplet inurl:LvAppl
    inurl:/showcam.php?camid
    inurl:vide o.cgi?resolution=
    inurl:image?cachebust=
    intitle :"Live View / - AXIS"
    inurl:view/view.shtml
    intext:"MOBOTIX M1"
    intext:"Open Menu"
    intitle:snc-rz30
    inurl:home/
    inurl:"Multi CameraFrame?Mode="
    intitle:"EvoCam" inurl:"webcam.html"
    intitle:"Live NetSnap Cam-Server feed"
    intitle:"Live View / - AXIS 206M"
    intitle:"Live View / - AXIS 206W"
    intitle:"Live View / - AXIS 210"
    inurl:indexFrame.shtml Axis
    inurl:"ViewerFrame?Mode="
    inurl:"MultiCamer aFrame?Mode=Motion"
    intitle:start inurl:cgistart
    intitle:"WJ-NT104 Main Page"
    intext:"MOBOTIX M1" intext:"Open Menu"
    intext:"MOBOTIX M10" intext:"Open Menu"
    intext:"MOBOTIX D10" intext:"Open Menu"
    intitle:snc-z20 inurl:home/
    intitle:snc-cs3 inurl:home/
    intitle:snc-rz30 inurl:home/
    intitle:"sony network camera snc-p1"
    intitle:"sony network camera snc-m1"
    site:.viewnetcam.com -www.viewnetcam.com
    intitle:"Toshiba Network Camera" user login
    intitle:"netcam live image"
    intitle:"i-Catcher Console - Web Monitor"
    inurl:/home/home
    1. Re:YOU FUCKING LOVE IT by Dash+Hash · · Score: 1

      Nice list, but my personal favorite is still
      -inurl:htm -inurl:html intitle:"index of" "Last modified" mp3

      Of course, it doesn't have to end with mp3, if that isn't what you want.

      --
      Calling a sword by a pretty name is no more than adding perfume to poison.
    2. Re:YOU FUCKING LOVE IT by E++99 · · Score: 1

      Dude. This one has hot college geek girls... with a phone number, no less.
      http://ithccam.umecit.maine.edu/view/view.shtml?vi deos=&id=14517

  25. Live dog-with-dog action by adnonsense · · Score: 0, Troll

    Found on Google here

    (And yes, it is surprisingly SFW, at least the frames I've seen so far are)

  26. and... by antdude · · Score: 1
    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  27. Urban legend? Hoax? by gvc · · Score: 1

    The commentary makes no sense at all. A bunch of disconnected factoids, that may or may not be true. I would need to hear a more convincing means, opportunity and motive before I swallowed a word of it.

  28. Suggested Response To The Bomb Threat by Toad-san · · Score: 1

    "Oh, there's a bomb? In our store? How nice! Have a nice day."

    "Oh, it's you again? Yeah, right, like you said .. a bomb. We got that. Good day!"

    "What? Again? Money? Are you crazy? Man, we'd rather have the bomb! Now go away!"

    "Look .. I know, it's probably a very nice bomb. Noooo, we're not looking for it. We don't really care, see? We figure one of our customers will probably buy it. Hmmm .. there's a thought .. got any more? Maybe we can work something out here .. hello? Hello?"

    It worked a few centuries ago: "Millions for defense, not one penny for tribute."

    1. Re:Suggested Response To The Bomb Threat by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 2, Funny

      1. Open store
      2. Receive bomb threat
      3. Ignore demands, find bomb
      4. Sell bomb on black market
      5. Profit!!!
      6. Goto Step2

  29. Later when the recordings where reviewed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. all faces where covered with the text
    "I thought what I'd do was, I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes."

  30. hehe, this sort of thing is fun by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    Well, not the crime part but the poking around with cameras. :) I was taking a computer class and one of the guys there mentioned this. I hit the google and had a string of candidates to look at within seconds. After about five minutes of searching, I found an unsecured and controllable camera. Its purpose was to monitor the construction of a new building at a California college. However, the camera had such a range of motion that I could easily turn it to observe the intersection across from it.

    If any of you guys have viewed the gigapixel camera demos online, you know what I'm talking about when I say the zoom is phenomenal. Technology has now matched Hollywood. I turn the camera to look at the buildings across the street, the windows are all tiny, all I can see is they're lit. I start zooming in and I can eventually see the face of the guy working late, he's got his PC turned on his desk so I see his face in profile. Holy shit, I bet he wouldn't even be able to find the camera outside his window if I called him up and told him I could see him. And that idea, of course, made me want to call him up and tell him I could see him! The crazy thing is I probably could have, too. Find name of building the camera is attached to, pull it up on google maps and find the name of the building across the street from him, call the main switchboard there, get transfered to the right floor and that guy's extension, plus his name but first I'd need one of those creepy voice modulators...either that or learn how to do Stewie's voice properly. "Hello, Steve -- may I call you Steve? Forgive me for being a bit forward but I feel it's pointless to stand on politeness when I'm going to kill you anyway. Victory is mine!"

    But on a more serious note, miniaturization just means we'll see cameras like this that can operate on solar power, have permanent wireless access to the net and can remain operational for days. The zoom potential means there's no limit to the line of sight. Oh, and how do you mount them? Have you seen the advances made in battery-operated RC choppers? With the way technology is advancing, the future is five minutes from now.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  31. Different businesses in different cities??? by stanleypane · · Score: 1

    FTA:

    FBI spokesman Rich Kolko said the threat appears to be related to a plot in recent days focusing on banks and stores in places like Detroit, Phoenix, Salt Lake City, Philadelphia and Newport, R.I.

    It sounds like they are randomly finding these cameras all over the place. They aren't hitting just one chain or anything like that. It's different types of businesses in completely different cities.

    I think it's highly unlikely that they have an inside connection in 11+ states spread across the US. It's more likely they are scanning through Google or maybe they've managed to get access to a security company that manages many of these remote cameras as a service to businesses.

    Aside from the criminal aspect of these incidents, it sounds like something I'd have done back in my IRC days while on a phone conference as a prank.

    But, I don't work in the security industry. You probably have more insight into this kind of thing. Is it normal for businesses to outsource their security cameras to large, national security companies like this?

  32. A simple solution by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

    It should be legal to appear naked in public places if one has been ordered to do so over the Internet. That way, naked customers can exit hacked stores without fear of prosecution.

  33. Reality Imitates Ghost in the Shell by bmajik · · Score: 1

    One of the things that "The Laughing Man" did in the GITS TV series was that he could hack video feeds in near-real-time. On one occasion he ghost-hacked someone's cybernetic eyes and became effectively invisible. More commonly, he would simultaneously hack all of the security cameras in a public place and overlay this funny "animated gif" over the top of his head to conceal his identity.

    Nobody could figure out who he was because nobody had ever actually "seen" him.

    Many video cameras now transmit mjpeg or mpeg-4 over http instead of an NTSC video signal down coax.

    We keep getting closer to the level of pervasive internet connectivity and dependance that is the foundation of the GITS world. One could imagine a list of things required both technically and societally to get us from "here" to "there", and the list is always getting shorter a bit sooner than I'd expect.

    --
    My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
  34. Way to go... by TimeTraveler1884 · · Score: 1

    You're no better than the terrorists! Ten or so homes and businesses are likely to be burned to the ground after their AXIS Network Cameras catch fire after a thorough Slashdotting. Bravo.

  35. Blame M$, again. by twitter · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Although it is possible to hack these systems, it is a remote chance if configured properly like anything else.

    I've seen these systems being sold to Casinos and what not. The fancy video cards only work with Winblows, so hacking them is only as hard as that.

    how did they find the IP of a target store?

    You look for the web page they serve with Google. If you don't customize every page and eliminate the keyword combinations, your site can be found.

    This is an issue people need to be aware of. Security is only as strong as it's weakest link. People should demand video systems that work with a better OS.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Blame M$, again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much does Microsoft pay you to make its critics look like complete morons by association? Because it isn't nearly enough.

  36. Re:Urban legend? Hoax? by singingjim1 · · Score: 1

    They just picked out tidbits from the actual news story of someone making bomb threats to multiple stores and banks and demanding money be transferred to a bank account or they would blow up the store/bank. They think they might have had access to the security cameras OR possibly were within eyesight of the places they were threatening because they forced the customers to disrobe. Flimsy evidence at best I think, but it's certainly possible: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=inurl%3A%22Vi ewerFrame%3FMode%3D%22&btnG=Google+Search

  37. Anyone ever try this? by singingjim1 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=inurl%3A%22Vi ewerFrame%3FMode%3D%22&btnG=Google+Search Plenty of unsecured network security cameras out there. You can even control them over the internet - pan, zoom, etc. Good fun when you absolutely having nothing better to do.

  38. Or, "Snoop onto them as they snoop onto you." by conspirator57 · · Score: 1

    As in "Hackers" (movie, not real people)

    --
    "If still these truths be held to be
    Self evident."
    -Edna St. Vincent Millay
  39. One of the dumber scams I've ever read about by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah, wire me the money - I'll get it someday when the police aren't looking...

    This was a hoax, a prank. Somebody was just having fun jerking people around.

    And see how easy it was. Anybody remember the Chinese Fire Drill in the book "Illuminatus?" Act authoritative - or threatening in this case - and spew out some orders, and everybody falls right into line like lemmings.

    The first response to the bomb threat should have been, "Fine - set it off. We'll settle up later, asshole."

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  40. Returned equipment by PhotoGuy · · Score: 1

    An obliquely related story; I bought a security webcam, wasn't happy with it, thought I did a factory reset, but I guess I didn't. When it was purchased, suddenly I was bombarded with emailed images from a strangers house :S The only ones who could track it down was the ISP Eastlink, who ignored my pleading for months.

    Then CTV ran a story on it, and they magically found the customer, informed them, and the problem was solved. Amazing (and sad) how a bit of media attention will get the job done.

    Link here with video.

    Ironically, while CTV blurred out the new owner's images for their privacy, they clearly showed my email address on national TV. D'oh. My previously clean account has been getting a load of spam since then. (Who harvests email addresses for spam from TV segments??!?!?!?)

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  41. High risk, low reward... by avronius · · Score: 1

    Each of the three most common metals used in catalytic converters (palladium, platinum and rhodium) are worth a bundle. But you'd be hard pressed to get more than about $50 worth of material from each catalyst. Aa lot of work with a lot of risk for such a low return.

  42. Re: mmmkay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It should be legal to appear naked in public places if one has been ordered to do so over the Internet.

    Ok. I'll bite. I hereby order you to get naked. Just don't scare the kiddies, mmmkay? ;)

  43. ethnic lightning by hawk · · Score: 1

    At least in Nevada, the phrase "Jewish lightning" is *not* ethnic. Rather, it's a reference to Meyer Lanski, who was a master of the convenient fire during the mob days here.
    awk
    h

  44. That has gained status of international scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just saw this on the TV: there are reports the FBI asked for help to at least one european police to find the thiefs, as they have tracked at least one call from one european country. Stupid arses! The exchange rate for Euro against the US dollar is too low. The banks will get the lion share of this scam, with all the charges and transfer costs. Ah! Ah!

  45. Re:Oh so true ... and there are other problems. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    You do not use XP. personal computer based systems are the lowest end and we refuse to sell them. you buy a dedicated pvr box. they record faster are virus immune and are designed for one task. Actually most run Linux even the ones that claim differently (pop their hard drive in a PC and discover its a Linux disk format). If you want a cheapie digital video recorder based on consumer computer parts, I suggest looking for Zoneminder. its the only one that is worth using. I have tried and threw away every windows based PVR recording solutions out there. All of them are hokey and not really useable for real security. you need event recording based on camera motion detection and it needs to rate that motion in a grade so you can sort by larger scores to find real events instead of the 10,000 recorded events during partly cloudy days for outdoor cameras.

    If you want a good cheap dedicated system, go looking at supercircuits (google that name) they have some low end digital mpeg4 pvr's that are acceptable.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.