Slashdot Mirror


Germany Plans To Email Trojans

speardane sends us word of a proposal in the German legislature to make it legal for that government to email spyware to terror suspects. The action comes in response to a court denying prosecutors' requests to break into suspects' computers over the Internet. The German chancellor supports the measure despite considerable outcry from political opponents and rights groups.

166 comments

  1. Fan-diddly-astic by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It sounds like the honour virus to be honest, "We need to monitor you, if you would wear this covert recording hat whilst doing your illegal stuff it would be fan-diddly-astic".

    Will it be illegal to thwart the attack?

    Will it become illegal to use an alternative operating system or antivirus software or even just common sense to deflect these payloads?

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:Fan-diddly-astic by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Funny
      I just don't see how this is possible at all. How do you get those foil wrappers in an email? Just won't work.

      And besides, what happens if the guy is celibate? Or a Unix?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Fan-diddly-astic by FlyByPC · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Will it be illegal to thwart the attack?

      More to the point, would it be illegal to reverse-engineer the spyware and send the guvmint all sorts of interesting information (that it would presume to be the spyware reporting back in?)

      After all, Big Brother deserves the very best, right?
      --
      Paleotechnologist and connoisseur of pretty shiny things.
    3. Re:Fan-diddly-astic by wizardforce · · Score: 1

      Will it become illegal to use an alternative operating system or antivirus software or even just common sense to deflect these payloads?
      yes. there was a story net a few says ago where a court ordered that the guy couldn't use anything other than windows because their monitering software only worked on it, he had ubuntu and apparently they didnt find a way to port the software. of course that doesnt prevent the guy from bypassing all that crap and using a live cd and installing linux again- the software only works after it is loaded in the OS isn't it?
      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    4. Re:Fan-diddly-astic by cez · · Score: 1

      Interesting questions... How about would it be illegal to forward that Trojan to someone else unsuspecting so it's installed on their PC instead... or hell a disorderly conduct charge for running it on your PC and knowing its there...keeping the enforcement agency busy with a script to continuously peruse some Goatse and tubgirl links of course...

      --
      Walk with Music;
    5. Re:Fan-diddly-astic by ACS+Solver · · Score: 1

      And if the trojan is mistakenly mailed to a person not linked with terrorism and ruins their PC, can they sue the government for damage successfully?

    6. Re:Fan-diddly-astic by Psion · · Score: 3, Funny

      Shhhhh! Listen!

      Whoooooooosh!

      Wow. I wonder what that was?

    7. Re:Fan-diddly-astic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      must be using those tubes the republican senators keep talking about.

    8. Re:Fan-diddly-astic by hazem · · Score: 5, Insightful

      yes. there was a story net a few says ago where a court ordered that the guy couldn't use anything other than windows because their monitering software only worked on it,

      There is a huge difference. In the case you're referring to, the man was already convicted of a crime. A result of conviction is often a loss of certain liberties and rights. As a condition of his parole (which can be quite arbitrary on the part of the state) he can continue to use a computer provided it is with the monitoring software running - this is only possible with Windows. It's difficult to make a case that will stand up that the conditions are particularly onerous or truly cruel and unusual.

      On the other hand, this article is about a case where a government wants to send spy software to suspected criminals in the homes they can get useful information for a prosecution. I'm not familiar with German law, but if this were the US, it's probably okay for the government to do this. There are similar tactics that have not been thrown out, such as mailing a "you won a prize" envelope to a suspected murderer/rapist - which he then licked, leaving his DNA, and returned - thus giving the probable cause for an arrest and prosecution).

      The government can't yet compel someone to give up their DNA and I suspect that a similar logic would be applied to a person's choice of computer software - the government can't compel you to use a certain kind of software just to make it convenient to gather data to be used against you. We are all presumed innocent and they have to have probable cause merely to investigate. To actually compel you to give up rights (requiring you to run specific software) you need to have a conviction... or a law that applies to all of us.

    9. Re:Fan-diddly-astic by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or forward it to 10,000 of your closest friends. After half the world's computers get infected, and we trace back the virus to the German government, we'll see how impressed the rest of the world is with them.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    10. Re:Fan-diddly-astic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The scope and danger of this issue is vastly underestimated by the tech community, semi-knowledgeable people in particular. Mere "users" believe that the government can successfully sneak into their computer and they fear that their little wrongdoings might come to light. People who actually read the proposals and explanations understand that this isn't your normal email trojan. The people in between, who thwart every worm wave, filter spam and generally have their computer under control, are the ones who think they can simply detect and avoid or remove whatever the government throws at them. Their hubris is a big mistake.

      If you're a proficient hacker, what can you do to a machine when you can change each and every packet that leaves or enters it? You don't need to send an email. You just wait until the terr'ist downloads any program. MD5 checksums won't foil the attack because they will be changed as well. SSL won't help because the attacker has access to a trusted CA. Terr'ist doesn't download programs? Any malformed-data zero-day exploit can be used to put software on the target system, but if the terr'ist updates regularly, that won't even be necessary. Updates are programs. Getting data out of the target system isn't a problem either, regardless of firewall and IDS. You control every packet to and from that system. Webbrowsing on any site is a usable side-channel. The attacker can test with all AV programs to see that the spy software isn't detected. The spy software doesn't need to write itself to persistent storage, it can stay in RAM where it is very hard to detect and isolate for inspection.

      The level of defense know-how that would be necessary to detect and avert such an attack is far beyond what even hardened criminals can afford. Once this instrument is available, it will be used against run of the mill "online criminals" sooner or later, if they stand in the way of profit. It's the normal expansion of applicability which affects each and every criminal investigation method introduced to fight the "unspeakable" crimes like child pornography, terrorism or drugs.

    11. Re:Fan-diddly-astic by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Here's a more interesting thing: Would it be illegal to forward the same trojan to, say, the NSA with the intent to infect and making it look like it's from the German Feds?

      Think of the diplomatic fun we'll all have!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    12. Re:Fan-diddly-astic by PPH · · Score: 0
      How will they know what size to send?


      I take a Magnum XL. Thanks.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    13. Re:Fan-diddly-astic by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      the government can't compel you to use a certain kind of software just to make it convenient to gather data to be used against you
       
      I wonder.
       
      What about that story the other day about the torrent distributor who was ordered to keep his ram data because he wouldn't log IP addresses? He was apparently told to "Just turn on logging", he refused so they made an order for him to store his ram contents.
       
      Is "You must keep logs" all that much different from "You must run THIS operating system"?

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    14. Re:Fan-diddly-astic by ajdecon · · Score: 1

      Yes: the torrent distributor was involved in legal proceedings, currently in the discovery phase. This was a specific court order for the purposes of trying a particular case, rather than some blanket "Everyone must use Windows so we can spy on them!"

      --
      "Science is a way of trying not to fool yourself." -Richard Feynman
    15. Re:Fan-diddly-astic by ehrichweiss · · Score: 0

      The joke passing over YOUR head apparently.

      --
      0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
    16. Re:Fan-diddly-astic by ehrichweiss · · Score: 1

      Goddammit!! I gotta start reading at -1 cause I totally missed the post you were replying to since it was at -1..and I thought you were responding to its parent post. Ah well.

      --
      0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
    17. Re:Fan-diddly-astic by dbrutus · · Score: 1

      They would have about the same rights and chances for compensation as someone who lost their garden to an errant artillery shell

    18. Re:Fan-diddly-astic by MasterOfCeremonies · · Score: 1

      It's difficult to make a case that will stand up that the conditions are particularly onerous or truly cruel and unusual.

      Forcing someone to use Windows might not be unusual, but it is certainly cruel.

    19. Re:Fan-diddly-astic by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Or reverse engineer it and hire a botnet owner to DDOS the fed servers with false information.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    20. Re:Fan-diddly-astic by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Data interception like that can be detected, too. Takes only one spotter and the whole thing breaks down. They should go back to busting doors and sending in the armed forces when warranted and fucking off when not.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    21. Re:Fan-diddly-astic by Stellian · · Score: 1

      Will it be illegal to thwart the attack?
      No more illegal than speaking Navajo over the phone to thwart eavesdroppers.

      Will it become illegal to use an alternative operating system or antivirus software or even just common sense to deflect these payloads?
      No more illegal than dumping the analog land line in favor of Skype.

      Let's analyse this from the classic wiretapping perspective everyone can relate to. I personally agree with wiretapping: it's a very good compromise between the the loss of liberty and privacy versus it's utility in fighting real criminals. As long as solid procedures are followed to have my communication monitored (i.e. proper warrant and suspicion exists), I feel the risk of being snooped at by the State are negligible.

      Whether you like it or not, in law enforcement there is frequently the need to monitor the suspect without letting him know he's monitored. Sure, you can obtain a warrant to search he's house, computer, etc. and convict him based on any evidence found, but at the same time, the news will spread like wildfire in the criminal organization, severely limiting the effectiveness of the taxpayer's law enforcing buck.

      More to the point, monitoring someones computer is not as simple as using tcpdump on his broadband connection. The level of encryption present even in free consumer software effectively blocks any kind of monitoring, and the analogy with wiretapping simply does not hold - the only way to obtain the evidence is to monitor the computing device itself.

      It's debatable if trojans are the ethical way to accomplish this - for example, they can be used to easily plant evidence, with very little chance to defend against it. What's not debatable is the right of the society to create and approve effective tools for law enforcement, with a reasonable privacy / effectiveness trade off.

      Your privacy is not sacred: it's something that we, as a society, grant you as long as you don't anally rape our kids. (yeah, I know, the old TOTC - quite relevant here, I think :)
    22. Re:Fan-diddly-astic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, this article is about a case where a government wants to send spy software to suspected criminals in the homes they can get useful information for a prosecution.

      No, thats not what the proposed law says. The proposed law would apply
      - to anybody who surpasses a certain threshold which is
          still below what in Germany would be legally required
          to start a formal police investigation. Say, if you participate in a
          demonstration against the G8, then you are in already.
      - to anybody who ever had any kind of contact to such
          a person. I.e., to everyone.

      Furthermore some local politicians have already demanded
      that it should also apply to pet crime such as handling
      or receiving stolen goods.

      Finally, this being Germany, you should expect the following to happen
      - the constituational court will strike it down
      - the politicians will pass a similar law again
      - the consitutational court will strike that one down again ...

      Thomas

    23. Re:Fan-diddly-astic by soccerisgod · · Score: 1

      Supposedly, all incarnations of this crap will be "personalized" to match whatever software runs on the victims computer. How that is supposed to work is unclear as of yet. It seems unlikely they will rewrite their trojan every time, so it can be assumed they'll assemble a suitable trojan from components. So in other words it will probably not work on just any other computer, except if it happens to run the same software.

      --
      If a train station is a place where a train stops, what's a workstation?
    24. Re:Fan-diddly-astic by arminw · · Score: 1

      .....If you're a proficient hacker, what can you do to a machine when you can change each and every packet that leaves or enters it?.......

      What if the machine isn't even connected to the Internet? Will they mail them a floppy?

      A Terrorist could always use some cheap laptop on one of the thousands of wireless open access points and encrypt all the emails to their buddies in Afghanistan. He would never use that computer for opening any emails from anyone else. He could have another computer that would run the trojan and send the investigators on all sorts of rabbit trails and wild goose chases or simply show that he was totally "innocent".

      --
      All theory is gray
    25. Re:Fan-diddly-astic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The government - more specifically, the interior minister, a wheelchair-bound, bitter-looking man - plans to "hide" their trojan in mail purporting to come from the ministry for social affairs or the finance ministry. Germans being notoriously in awe of governmment, it is assumed they will open such mails on the grounds that if they don't they might offend the authorities, something Germans are loathe to do (unless they can be sure not to be found out).

      Of course the whole thing is quite absurd. Does anyone seriously believe a person hell-bent on blowing up himself as well as fifty civilians is going to write it all down in detail and storing it on his HD in a word document marked "If you are looking for dastardly deeds being planned please open this file"?

    26. Re:Fan-diddly-astic by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Rather unlikely. It's quite hard to really "personalize" a trojan. It would most of all decrease the chance of success when you try to "bind" it to certain hardware, all that needs to happen is the suspect changing parts of his hardware to disable it.

      Besides, it is code. Code can be disassembled and rewritten, and "de-personalized". Can you imagine the damage possible by a widespread distribution of a depersonalized "Bundestrojaner"? No matter how it's a desaster. Either no AV kit finds it (due to it being on a "do not find" list) and thus causing more havoc than MyDoom and Blaster together, flooding the data control server with junk or making the trojan worthless because everyone knows what to look for, thus changing the trojan from a tool to spy on suspects into a tool to warn suspects that they're under surveillance.

      Besides, what should keep a trojan writer from creating one and simply claiming it is the "Bundestrojaner"? Then spread it outside of Germany, preferably to sensitive companies, let's say Boeing or Lockheed Martin, that either are in tough competition with EU based companies or US military hardware supplyers? If you want to cause distrust between countries, now you can.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    27. Re:Fan-diddly-astic by soccerisgod · · Score: 1

      Ok first of all, nobody said anything about binding anything to hardware, no idea where you got that notion from. Secondly, I'm only repeating what the department of the interior is claiming about their tool. No detailed explanation was given, only that the trojan would be adapted to indivdual needs (the software running on the target computer).

      --
      If a train station is a place where a train stops, what's a workstation?
    28. Re:Fan-diddly-astic by Josef+Meixner · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, this article is about a case where a government wants to send spy software to suspected criminals in the homes they can get useful information for a prosecution. I'm not familiar with German law, but if this were the US, it's probably okay for the government to do this.

      In Germany it is not clear if it is or not. For the last two years it was allowed by a simple decree without being know publicly. Once it was known, the supreme court simply forbid it as unlawful practice in spring. Since then the law and order politicians decree that criminal prosecution of organized crime and terrorism is not possible without it, as the bad guys can encrypt their data and so it can't be gotten by normal means.

      The problem is, that in principle the privacy of the home is protected and the supreme court some years ago already cut back the use of electronic listening devices. E.g. there is no way a bedroom can be bugged, as it is so clearly a private room, that a judge can't allow it to be bugged under current rules.

      That basic ruling is now applied to the PC, as for many people the PC is also very much in the core of their lives and is considered private. So if it is, it is off hands for bugging. Searching with a search warrant is obviously still allowed, the same is true of bedrooms.

      One of the states has already enacted some law to allow the remote bugging of PCs (basically allowing to crack into a PC remotely, installing key loggers already was allowed if they were installed like a listening device) and there is an outstanding decision about that by the supreme court, but the law and order politicians don't want to wait and instead want to enact the law as soon as possible. The arguments grow ever more ridiculous, from "99.9% of all Germans won't be affected" which means that only about 800,000 people would be affected, to "we only forsee 10 to 15 cases per year" which is in no way binding and it could fast be used for who knows which crimes, those things tend to get expanded to new crimes on a regular basis. The explanations from the head of the state police (both of the forementioned explanations were from him) also obviously is completely clueless what he is talking about.

      Ironically details of the one and only cases up to now became public and the attempt was done so foolish, that it is hard to imagine that it will ever work. For the case known the police basically dropped a CD into the mailbox of the suspect which looked like one of those things ISPs sometimes send per mail in the hope he might install it. If that is the kind of criminal they intend to catch, then I seriously doubt that that kind of criminal even knows what "encryption" means.

    29. Re:Fan-diddly-astic by hazem · · Score: 1

      Finally, this being Germany, you should expect the following to happen
      - the constituational court will strike it down
      - the politicians will pass a similar law again
      - the consitutational court will strike that one down again ...


      Kudos to the constitutional court in Germany. I wish ours worked so well...

    30. Re:Fan-diddly-astic by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Ok, then don't bind it to hardware and show me how you want to 'personalize' the trojan. Computer name? User name? Those are changed even more easily. Software running? Mailboxes checked? Even a notch easier.

      How do you want to personalize the trojan and yet ensure that it keeps running at the target without being able to run on a different computer that you do not want to spy on?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    31. Re:Fan-diddly-astic by KlausBreuer · · Score: 1

      Thwarting the attack would require 'hacker tools'. Which are ILLEGAL in Germany.

      Reverse-engineering: dito. You'd actually end up in JAIL for this: usage of hacker tools.
      No wonder these tools were forbidden a while ago.

      Welcome to political morons of massive stupidity.

      Yes, I live in Germany.

      Ciao,
      Klaus

      --
      Free PC version of ChipWits at http://www.breueronline.de/klaus/chipwits/
  2. Too bad Angela Merkel is also computer illiterate by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 1

    Because if only she had understood what the proposal is about...

    I guess we need to wait for another generation to get into politics, the one that is currently growing up with computers.

    --
    It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
    Be yourself no matter what they say
  3. Do not open attachments from strangers by Nomen+Publicus · · Score: 1

    So, what happens when one of these emails is undelivered and bounces back to the sender. The German government better have _very_ good email filtering.

  4. Well... by Joseph1337 · · Score: 0

    maybe this will push linux into the desktops...

    1. Re:Well... by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 1

      ...of terrorists.

      Tomorrow's Fox News headline:

      Linux is supporting terrorists and smothering babies. We must stop it at all costs.

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
    2. Re:Well... by Caesar+Tjalbo · · Score: 0

      maybe this will push linux into the desktops...
      ...in afghanistan. If you mail Linux too. After you've mailed desktops.


      Have a bit of love for the Germans though, FTA:

      In recent weeks, German troops and others working in Afghanistan have been targeted by Islamic radicals in suicide bombings and kidnappings...
      "They'll bomb and kidnap, well, we'll spam them to death with trojans!"
      --
      "I'm not much interested in interoperability. I want substitutability. I want to be able to throw your software out."
    3. Re:Well... by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      maybe this will push linux into the desktops...

      or not. Assuming the trojan only works on Windows machines (fairly easy call, since 95%+ of all desktop computers run some form of Windows), all the German government needs to do to make sure they can infect any computer in their jurisdiction is to outlaw the use of alternate operating systems on any desktop computer in use in Germany. Needless to say, this ought to help out Microsoft's bottom line in Germany. We're talking a legal state-sponsored monopoly here. Ain't capitalism grand?

      What I'm wondering is, how the German government intends to limit its spying to only German citizens. Seems to me that if they blanket email everybody on their list, that people will be added to that list 'just in case'. What kind of screwup will allow computers in the United States to be targetted?

      Come to think of it, what would stop Homeland Security from turning over email addresses of 'suspected terrorists' to the German government for infection and data skimming? How would you prove that they did?

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    4. Re:Well... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, someone has to gather the information, so you'll have some kind of IP address that gives you a hint who broke into your computer.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Well... by jlarocco · · Score: 1

      We're talking a legal state-sponsored monopoly here. Ain't capitalism grand?

      A state sponsored monopoly isn't capitalism, dumbass.

    6. Re:Well... by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      fairly easy call, since 95%+ of all desktop computers run some form of Windows

      Not such an easy call. From what I know, knowledge of alternate operating systems is more widely spread in Germany; the stereotype of the technically adept German has at least some truth in it.

      I'd be surprised if Windows has more than 80% market penetration in Germany.

      Mart
      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
  5. Thanks for the heads up... by tinrobot · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...sincerely,

    The Terrorists.

    1. Re:Thanks for the heads up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Terrorists read Digg, not Slashdot.

    2. Re:Thanks for the heads up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not exactly. Reading Digg makes you a terrorist, but it does not necessarily mean you were a terrorist before you read it.

    3. Re:Thanks for the heads up... by Bravoc · · Score: 1

      Sorry, the US FBI already tried that http://www.sandman.com/taliban.html

    4. Re:Thanks for the heads up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't you have prefaced that comment with something about Soviet Russia?

  6. Honeypot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Now wont the terrorists set up their own honeypots for these?

    I think it would be pretty cool to get a trojen written by the government, that sends data back to the government and is read by computers in the most secret government areas... imagine what terrorists could do if they find a bug in it?

    1. Re:Honeypot by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      I think it would be pretty cool to get a trojen written by the government, that sends data back to the government and is read by computers in the most secret government areas... imagine what terrorists could do if they find a bug in it?

      Like feed the government false info? Install back doors into government databases? Hit the servers that skim the data with DDOS attacks?

      Seems to me to be a good way to turn a law abiding citizen into an 'enemy combatant' in an instant, especially if they discover the trojan and have their 12 year old kid hack it to feed the government bogus info...

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    2. Re:Honeypot by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Of course you'd launch the attack from a botnet. One exploit and you're talking business, would be easy to make the govt comps do enough to start a war or at least a severe diplomatic desaster. Knowing these fed idiots it'll probably be easier to make their machines declare war on the NATO than putting a "hacked by Russia" notice on an MS server.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    3. Re:Honeypot by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      German Intelligence report:

      The information feed from our Trojan has started revealing new information in the last few days.
      Analysis of the terrorist communications reveals the ring leader is a man named Apu Nahasapeemapetilon, with his co-conspirators being an Omar Simpson, and a chemical weapons expert known only as "Professor" Frink. They have access to an unknown chemical or biological weapon referred to as a 'jumbo Squishee'. Their exact target is unknown yet, but is somewhere in northern Belgium. Omar Simpson has been recorded saying he will 'get Flanders' and that he 'really hates Flanders'.
      Further Surveillance recommended.

    4. Re:Honeypot by arminw · · Score: 1

      ......especially if they discover the trojan and have their 12 year old kid hack it to feed the government bogus info........

      Why bother hacking it? Just use it to do all sorts of stuff to give the listeners at the other end fits. Get another computer for the real stuff. Computers are cheap these days. What's a few hundred to an oil funded terrorist?

      --
      All theory is gray
  7. Via e-mail? by peipas · · Score: 5, Funny

    The leader of your terrorist cell has sent you an e-card! Double-click the attachment to view it!

    [Attached: ecard.exe]

  8. Final solution... by The+Orange+Mage · · Score: 1

    The German chancellor supports the measure despite considerable outcry from political opponents and rights groups.
    Just send them by the trainload to conce...err, Computer Camp. Bore them to death with "edutainment" software. Green blood and robots for all!
  9. Email terror suspects and... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...terror suspects will know they are being investigated.

    If I were a terrorist, or really any kind of nefarious criminal (because you just know there are foolish people salivating about doing the same to any criminal suspects) I would welcome this decision. If was a bad guy and I was worried that 'they' were on to me, receiving this trojan would be proof positive.

    And then I would take the opportunity to feed false information back to the people who sent me the trojan. Hooo boy, what a great way to make trouble for people I don't like, better than falsely reporting them to the IRS.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    1. Re:Email terror suspects and... by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      Maybe you overestimate how clever terrorists are. Just look at the next James Bond film: Terrorists are really clever there, but the law (James Bond) is just a bit more clever. Translated to reality, the police are not the brightest, and terrorists are slightly more stupid (if you look at their motivation, they are actually quite a lot more stupid).

      I don't have any doubt that a good hacking attack against terror suspects would succeed.

    2. Re:Email terror suspects and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You understand that movies are not reality right? If anything, they're anti-reality. Stop letting Hollywood propaganda define your views.

      Real terrorists are smart and nasty, and often successful (the existence of Ireland and the USA itself being prime examples - terrorist/freedom-fighter forces overthrowing the brits).

      That said, the people the USA defines as "terrorists" usually aren't these days.

    3. Re:Email terror suspects and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he underestimates the government who will just send the trojan to random people. Those sending false information back are terrorists.

    4. Re:Email terror suspects and... by jc42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If was a bad guy and I was worried that 'they' were on to me, receiving this trojan would be proof positive.

      Nah; it would just mean that you had a computer (presumably one running MS Windows ;-).

      Note that they want the right to send it to any "terror suspect". The word suspect means anyone at all. If challenged, all they have to say is that they suspect you of something. Or they suspect a relative of yours. Or someone you knew in college 20 years ago. Or someone three houses down the street. Or someone with a name vaguely like yours. Or they learned that an ancestor of yours five generations ago wasn't German.

      Such a law is really just a legal excuse to do nasty things to anyone at all, at any time.

      The fun thing in this case is that you just know that their software would be isolated, probably within a week, and would soon be available at warez sites everywhere, for anyone's own private use. Someone annoying you? Send them a trojan that would start reporting all your keystrokes to the police.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    5. Re:Email terror suspects and... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Sure, there are tons of stupid terrorists, the whole recent non-explosive 'car-bombs' in the UK is proof of that, as was Richard Reid and Jose Padilla and those guys who thought they could blow up JFK or the other ones in Florida who had no resources or training or even transportation but thought they could blow up some buildings in Chicago.

      But, this stuff works the same way it does with internet-hacking. Just think of all the dumb criminals as the equivalent of script-kiddies. It only takes one smart guy to get his hands on it and write up a tool to exploit it and all of the dummies are now just as smart as that one guy.

      "Congratulations!
      You have received an eavesdropping attempt from the German Police.
      Click here to falsely implicate that guy who stole your girlfriend."

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    6. Re:Email terror suspects and... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      But, this stuff works the same way it does with internet-hacking. Just think of all the dumb criminals as the equivalent of script-kiddies.

      Think of it as natural selection. At least sometimes in the history of humanity, Darwin deserves to be right.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:Email terror suspects and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may be overstimating the ability of the terrorists to distinguish this particular trojan attempt from all the rest of the spammy viruses floating around out there. All the police really have to do is the old rootkit + IRC + keylogger combo. It works because its sneaky. Terrorists have not proven to be especially tech-saavy. These are some of the same people who replaced their cell phones but kept the same SIM cards because they had unused minutes on them.

      I would set up the virus to log keystrokes and embed them in porn images via steganography and post them to Usenet. Funny thing is, the terrorists might be pleased with the library of porn that would be necessary to serve as a base for the encrypted delivery of their keystrokes.

    8. Re:Email terror suspects and... by Derosian · · Score: 1

      Or, once this trojan finds its way into the right hands, it would be altered and spread across the net for a DOS attack on the server who receives the information.

    9. Re:Email terror suspects and... by wordsnyc · · Score: 1

      "Such a law is really just a legal excuse to do nasty things to anyone at all, at any time."

      Bingo. It's not about "them." It's about YOU. Do you honestly think that real terrorists plot via email? Do you believe that the Govt. believes that? Silly boy. None of this surveillance shit, the security cams in every two-horse burg, the taps on every single electronic communication, is about "terrorism." It's about controlling people who have been taught to think that their lives are in imminent danger from terrorists every day, which they are not.

      Some people read 1984 and liked what they saw. It's really that simple.

      --
      Sent from the iPad I found in your car.
    10. Re:Email terror suspects and... by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      I think this would be the perfect time for a hacker to replace the SPD and CDU (govt party) websites with a mock NSDAP website.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    11. Re:Email terror suspects and... by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Easiest proof that it's not about terrorism: There's no terrorism in Germany. The RAF was defeated without all this fancy crap. All they're looking for is a new way to implicate the jews (or muslims) and communists.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    12. Re:Email terror suspects and... by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      But, this stuff works the same way it does with internet-hacking. Just think of all the dumb criminals as the equivalent of script-kiddies. It only takes one smart guy to get his hands on it and write up a tool to exploit it and all of the dummies are now just as smart as that one guy.
      --
      Not to mention that the trojans are written by public servants.

    13. Re:Email terror suspects and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think a mock SED (the old DDR regime) website would be more appropriate, because their "Stasi" effectively spied on everybody.

  10. Aren't the real trsts technology aware? by ls671 · · Score: 1

    Don't the real trsts know enough not to fall into this ?

    I mean there is people monitoring the net to prevent trsts actions. If they are feared in the sense that they could take important internet infrastructures down and cause considerable economic lost, would it be possible that they might have already learned to protect their data?

    I mean we aren't talking about getting into child prX0m amateur computers here.

    Do real big shot trsts run linux ? ;-)

    --
    Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
  11. Leave it to the Germans! by fishthegeek · · Score: 4, Funny

    To come up with a way to distribute birth control so efficiently! This would never work in America though, it's difficult enough getting them out of that quarter machine that resides in the restroom at the gas station.

    --
    load "$",8,1
    1. Re:Leave it to the Germans! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well the real question on my mind is: will they mail them in a plain brown wrapper? :)

    2. Re:Leave it to the Germans! by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      yes

      Also, best idea ever:
      The stock certificates are greatly desired because of the depiction of two nearly naked women.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  12. Too many holes to fly for long... by oKAMi-InfoSec · · Score: 1

    The question raised by LiquidCoooled of whether "thwarting the attack is illegal" is very interesting. Would such activity (i.e. deleting the trojan, altering the trojan's behavior or altering the messages it sends back) be considered something akin to evading arrest or fleeing the scene of a crime?

    Other questions that come to mind include:

    Will the German government call upon anti-virus makers to allow the Trojans to be inserted onto machines without a red flag being raised?

    Will the anti-virus companies go along with such a request?

    If some a/v manufacturers go along with it...then how long 'til hackers create/modify/reuse malware that match the government's version and thus slip by, undetected.

    This scheme has too many holes in it to fly for long...

    --
    Chalmer
    1. Re:Too many holes to fly for long... by nospam007 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Will the German government call upon anti-virus makers to allow the Trojans to be inserted onto machines without a red flag being raised?

      Will the anti-virus companies go along with such a request?

      --
      They already said they'd refuse.

  13. Also in other European countries by tonk · · Score: 4, Informative

    Papers that leaked from the German Federal Ministry of the Interior state that legal regulation allowing so called remote forensic searches exist
    - explicitly in Romania, Cypria, Latvia, Spain, and Switzerland,
    - implicitly in Slovenia,
    and that a similar approach to establish explicit allowance for remote forensic searches is ongoing in Sweden. At least readers in Sweden should contact their members of parliament and do some lobbyism. The current political discussion in Germany only got that public attention beacause some people started what they call nerd lobbyism.

    The German papers are available at http://netzpolitik.org/2007/bundesinnenministerium -beantwortet-fragen-zur-online-durchsuchung/

    It is also noteworthy that an also leaked draft of a new law regarding German federal criminal police (c.f. CCC press release at http://www.ccc.de/updates/2007/bkaterror) lists several other new or extended competencies.

    Criticism claims that Germany is on it's way to reinstate a secret police, with the last German incarnations being http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stasi and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gestapo.

    1. Re:Also in other European countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cypria?

    2. Re:Also in other European countries by tonk · · Score: 1

      Sorry, Cyprus of course.

    3. Re:Also in other European countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The really worrying scenario is this:

      1. The terrorists have anticipated the Western Democracies response to 9/11 etc. as regards ever more data collection and surveillance laws / systems / actions against all their citizens.

      2. They wait while the Western Democracies create total surveillance of their citizens which is a) what the "Islamic fascists" (to quote Bush) would want anyway and b) means they get comprehensive data on the free world's citizens made available for the stealing.

      3. Terrorists or terrorist sympathisers obtain this data by whatever means, illegal (e.g., cracking - PayPal, MonsterJobs anyone?) or legal (e.g., partially or completely taking over a state via. democratic elections (Turkey anyone?) which has access to this inter-governmentally shared data or by getting jobs as cleaners at "secure" government data centres).

      4. Then it's "Goodbye Jews".

      To paraphrase a senior UK police officer commenting during a debate here on ethnic profiling for stop and search purposes "We shouldn't be chasing old white ladies". Indeed. Even if this data was legally restricted to being used purely for anti-terrorism purposes (and not for e.g., parking fine enforcement) it would be a step in the right direction.

  14. How is this different? by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How is this different from being allowed to tap someone's phone or plant a bug? As long as warrants are involved this sounds like the privacy law actually working since they aren't allowed to carry out any espionage that isn't specificially allowed by law.

    1. Re:How is this different? by georgewilliamherbert · · Score: 1

      Exactly. As long as a warrant is required, this is exactly comparable to phone intercepts or bugging a location or car. In the US, those have been legal for a long time, with proper warrants.

    2. Re:How is this different? by Rudolf · · Score: 5, Informative

      How is this different from being allowed to tap someone's phone or plant a bug? As long as warrants are involved [...]

      With a warrant you have court approval. This is being done because the court did not grant approval.

      From the summary:
      The action comes in response to a court denying prosecutors' requests to break into suspects' computers over the Internet.

    3. Re:How is this different? by neumayr · · Score: 1

      A lot more data maybe?

      --
      Truth arises more readily from error than from confusion. -Francis Bacon
    4. Re:How is this different? by Skinny+Rav · · Score: 1

      With a warrant you have court approval. This is being done because the court did not grant approval


      I would rather say that the court did not grant approval because remote forensics is not in the law. Putting this into the law would enable courts to grant/deny approvals on merit grounds.

      Cheers
    5. Re:How is this different? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this different from being allowed to tap someone's phone or plant a bug? As long as warrants are involved [...]

      With a warrant you have court approval. This is being done because the court did not grant approval.

      From the summary:
      The action comes in response to a court denying prosecutors' requests to break into suspects' computers over the Internet. AFAIK they did not get court approval because there is no law allowing the police to do these kinf of things, unlike eg wiretapping. This is why they want this law. This does not mean (necessarily*) that they want to do this if they don't get court approval. but that they want to be able to get court approval in the future since there is a law allowing this under certain conditions.

      * I wrote "not necessarily" because there seem to be different opinions among the politicians on how high the hurdles should be...
    6. Re:How is this different? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this different from being allowed to tap someone's phone or plant a bug? As long as warrants are involved this sounds like the privacy law actually working since they aren't allowed to carry out any espionage that isn't specificially allowed by law.

      Under German law, if the police plants a bug
      - they need a warrant
      - only people who are suspects in a crime investigation
          may be wiretapped
      - and only their communication, not their private life
      - lawyers and various other groups may not be wiretapped
      - after some time, the police have to tell the suspect that
          they had planted a bug.

      With the proposed new law
      - no warrant is necessary
      - everybody may be wiretapped, the only real limit
          is how much data they can process
      - areas of life may be wiretapped that thus
          far may not be wiretapped at all
      - the police never have to tell the suspect that they had planted a bug.
      - they can actually put the evidence in place themselves.
          Once they have a trojan installed, putting some child
          porn on the computer is a piece of cake.

      Also, with the new law, they can wiretap half whole country
      (as everybody has at some point been in contact
      with a potential criminal),
      keep the things in storage, and if 25 years later they
      need something convenient against somebody, they can
      search their archives.

      Of course its all unconstitutional, the German
      constitutional court will need less than 12 months
      to strike it down.

      Thomas

  15. If it can be abused, it will be.... by budword · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Next they will just email their super duper virus to child porn operators, then tax evaders, then jay walkers. As the DMCA and the Patriot Act have taught us, if it can be abused, it will. It's just human nature, or the nature of people who choose to work for the man, anyway.

    1. Re:If it can be abused, it will be.... by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      I think they've been using spyware on child porn operators for much longer than terrorists.

      I just hope they fuck it up with that trojan, cause serious, irreversible damage to a few large companies and get their asses kicked so hard they can taste their own sphincter.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    2. Re:If it can be abused, it will be.... by cliffski · · Score: 1

      the good old slippery slope argument. But hold on, if we give the right to the state to imprison murderers and rapists, next it will be tax evaders, next litterbugs, next it will be gays and black people!
      No system where you give strong powers to the state is perfect, for obvious reasons, but I'm glad the state can lock people up, given due process, fair trials etc. I'm also glad the state has people with guns to shoot the *bad guys* and that it has wire tapping tech to find out what the *bad guys* are planning.
      Granted that these days the *good guys* are fucking up big time, and we have all kinds of issues with fair trials etc etc, but I'd still prefer the current system over the total anarchy that would come from the slippery slope argument to law enforcement.
      If there is another 9/11 style attack in the planning stages, I'd be VERY happy for any government to send out a few PC trojans if it thought (and satisfied a judge) that this would be of serious help in catching the guys before it goes ahead. And the day after that attack, you would wish they had done so too.

      --
      DRM-free indie games for the PC and Mac: Positech Games
  16. Pardon me for asking... by xednieht · · Score: 0, Troll

    But if you know the terrorist's email address why not just go pick him up?

    sieg heil

    --

    Hope is the currency of fools
    1. Re:Pardon me for asking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if you know the terrorist's email address why not just go pick him up?

      Please be to imagine up any way, ANY way, to reliably tell where someone is by knowing their email address.

    2. Re:Pardon me for asking... by secolactico · · Score: 1

      But if you know the terrorist's email address why not just go pick him up?

      Sure. Have a SWAT team waiting by the server, and the moment he shows up to pick up his email, jump him and take him down.

      --
      No sig
    3. Re:Pardon me for asking... by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      I think it's more the reverse, they know who they are suspecting but they'd have to find out his email first.

      But to answer your question: force email provider to give you the connection logs, have the ISP translate the IPs to users.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  17. The law is good but.. by eebra82 · · Score: 1

    There is no doubt in my mind that the ethics of this law are in favor of the government.

    The REAL issue here is not whether the government should be allowed to do it. The dilemma is how these terror suspects are sorted out and what it takes to be a terror suspect.

  18. Re:Pardon me for asking... ONCE EATEN PHOOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only difference is the german government is doing it on purpose.

  19. Email? by mlts · · Score: 1

    This seems like a rather lame, feel good proposal. "Emailing spyware" and having it be a success is a lot more complicated than it sounds.

    This assumes a lot. I'm pretty sure most stuff emailed this way would be utterly foiled by someone who uses Mail.app, mutt, elm, pine, Mailwasher Pro, or even Thunderbird. If the email is successful as a law enforcement trool, black hat criminal organizations will be going head over heels to get a copy so they can disassemble it, and use it for their own schemes.

  20. good news for linux by Funzo22 · · Score: 1

    looks like linux distros may find a new group of users to reach.... terrorists who don't want to get government virusses on their computer

    1. Re:good news for linux by SilentUrbanFox · · Score: 1

      Ssshhh, next thing you know they'll ban Linux for being a "surveillance circumvention tool."

  21. Mod Parent by Winckle · · Score: 1

    -1 Oblivious

  22. Re:Too bad Angela Merkel is also computer illitera by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

    I guess we need to wait for another generation to get into politics, the one that is currently growing up with computers.


    I don't know about Germany, but my generation grew up with computers. (I'm 35). And most of us seem to have almost no interest in politics.
  23. Re:Too bad Angela Merkel is also computer illitera by domatic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I guess we need to wait for another generation to get into politics, the one that is currently growing up with computers.

    How is that going to help necessarily? The relative number of people who actually understand computers isn't going up. The current crop of high schoolers just uses (or attempts to use....) the things without the least understanding of the technical, societal, or political issues involved. If anything, they're even dumber. They put their whole lives on MySpace and Facebook for the perusal of others.

    To be sure, there are always new geeks coming along but without a radical shift in our own understanding of how things other than computers work, we aren't going to help matters much either.
  24. Next headlines: by Arancaytar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Entire IP range used by governmental mail servers now blacklisted by most email filters.

    And I was half hoping it would finally grow out of fashion to be ashamed of this country now that the US was setting the world standard in pulling all this crap. Premature hope, apparently.

    1. Re:Next headlines: by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      Nope.
      Bushism #insert#: "The terrorists find new ways to harm our country and so do we."
      Does that answer your question?

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
  25. Just think by Schemat1c · · Score: 1

    If the Germans were able to do this to the terrorists that burnt down the Reichstag Building they might have saved millions of lives...

    oh, wait...

    --

    "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
    1. Re:Just think by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      It really is a pity if the terror comes from within the government. Fortunately these time are over... well, nevermind.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  26. You've got a friend! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    "You've got a friend! OsamaBL wants to add you to his friendslist, Cancel or Allow?"

    1. Re:You've got a friend! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *sigh* Allow.

  27. Re: You have GOT to be kidding me. by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    I'm so tangled in the multiple layers of paradox I can't get out.

    If this is "secret" spyware, then it's fair game for the terrorists to ... send back to spy on the government!!

    I'm dying to see a fiction treatment of the top German Govt hacker vs. the top Terrorist hacker. Given the ridiculous layers of influence both command, that would be a knockout.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  28. I expect its already being done by cdn-programmer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I expect this is already being done. The only issue really is how to bring anything found into court.

    Non-Germans would be expected to have no rights in a German court of law. Non-Americans have little rights in an American Court of law. This means it is legal for one country's law enforcement personnel to spy on non-citzens ...and then trade data with the said country's law enforcement personnel.

    The thing is how a German citizen living in Germany would be taken into court in Germany.... Similarly, how would an American Citizen be taken into court in America? If the said individual lives outside of his own country then perhaps its a bit easier...

    Nevertheless, our authorities have been spying on everyone for decades.

    I think all this really boils down to is what is admissible in a court of law. I doubt it will have any effect on what our spies actually do on a day to day basis.

    1. Re:I expect its already being done by badSkater · · Score: 1

      Yep, the government has most likely been doing this for years. Or something like it. The difference now being that surveillance has become more high profile and, as you mentioned, governments are now trying to justify this stuff to use it in court.

      Bear in mind that I am not suggesting these things are OK, just that I believe they are nothing new.

      I would hope the Germans have people who can come up with something better than emailing viruses to suspects. Heck, I would hope we (in the USA) have people smarter than that. It is almost as though this kind of stuff is done to give the suspects a false sense of security.

      Speaking of (personal) defenses, are there not many countries where the use of encryption technology is illegal?

    2. Re:I expect its already being done by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      Non-Germans would be expected to have no rights in a German court of law.

      No, with a few exceptions, all human beings have the same rights in a German, or really any European, court of law.

      Non-Americans have little rights in an American Court of law.

      I don't think so, I'd expect more or less the same.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    3. Re:I expect its already being done by techno-vampire · · Score: 2, Informative
      Non-Americans have little rights in an American Court of law.


      Actually, that's not true. The Bill of Rights applies to all persons living in the USA, even undocumented aliens. They have the same right to a fair and impartial trial, the same right to confront their accuser, the same right to counsel and so on. Not just in theory, but in practice, too. (Except for impartial trials, because that's not always easy to enforce, and partiality can't always be proven. But the courts do try to be as fair as they can.)

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    4. Re:I expect its already being done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Non-Americans have little rights in an American Court of law.

      USA had a covert neocon propaganda campaign running with the sole purpose of claiming that foreigners have no rights under US laws and that only americans have rights and are thus superior to any foreigner (with no rights) in USA.

      This, as has been pointed out, is a fallacy. But alas, many americans still believe the very successful neocon propaganda claims that foreigners have no rights.

    5. Re:I expect its already being done by udippel · · Score: 1

      Not just in theory, but in practice, too.

      Practice, like, in Guantanamero ?

    6. Re:I expect its already being done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Non-Germans would be expected to have no rights in a German court of law. Non-Americans have little rights in an American Court of law. Actually, I would expect non-Germans to have pretty much the same rights in a German court of law as Germans. And I am pretty sure they have. The same goes for non-Americans before an American court.
  29. And if the terrorists are Linux or Mac users? by jcr · · Score: 1

    Just asking...

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  30. Just how stupid are terrorists? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    Ignoring for the moment their clearly idiotic beliefs, just how stupid are terror suspects? Do they open random attachments? Do they use Outlook? Don't they run AV software that can detect rootkits regularly?

    Well, okay, the recent attacks in the UK looked like amature night, but surely the first thing in the Al-Quaida Computers for Terrorism and Jihad manual (after the bit about how they are the creation of infidels and how you mustn't look at porn on the internet if you want your 76 virgins) is "don't open random attachments"

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  31. 1A Plan, really! by tripwirecc · · Score: 1

    AV companies around the world are going to add the signatures to their lists. Are antivirus applications going to be banned then? I wouldn't be surprised, considering that other moronic law in regards to security/hacking tools.

    1. Re:1A Plan, really! by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You'll have a hard time getting that through.

      The German government could technically issue a "please do not find" letter. Now, I know a few people with a few AV labs and such a letter would most likely be met (inofficially) immediately with a shady tool on a shady page finding exactly this trojan and nothing else.

      But let's just for a moment assume that this won't happen. Instead, KAV gives the German government the finger, citing the "Russia is big, the Czar is far" proverb. Avira would most likely be forced to comply, sitting in Germany, so would probably some other EU-based AV vendors.

      They would, though, immediately go to Den Hague and sue for unfair trade disadvantages due to the laws in one member country.

      AV writers tend to be a zealous lot. If you think the EFF is hard on GPL violations, you've never seen AV fanatics meet malware proponents.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:1A Plan, really! by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I don't think so. F-secure found the Sony rootkit and had discussions with Sony for a long time before anything happened (and someone else took steps). Blocking a government Trojan would have even greater consequences so the antivirus companies would most likely leave it alone - even if it was from Saudi Arabia, Pakistan or China.

  32. There is still a chance... by zeromorph · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...that the Trojan won't actually be realized. (BBC):

    Justice Minister Brigitte Zypries, of the Social Democrats (SPD), has voiced concern about the spyware plans, saying they might infringe privacy laws,...

    But that depends on a lot of factors. Germany's biggest hacker organization the Chao Computer Club and others are very effectively campaigning against this plans.

    In recent news (only german, sorry) the federal police states that it won't be a trojan but what they call "remote forensic software" which they intend to install on the terrorists' computer manually. More like a software version of a bug (in the covert listening device sense).

    --
    "Hannibal's plans never work right. They just work." Amy/A-Team
  33. Subject by Dachannien · · Score: 4, Funny

    So what are they going to title the e-mail? I mean, they'll have to be really clever, to make sure the terrorists actually open it:

    "dude! you'll never believe what Osama said"
    "wow, I can't believe you haven't blown yourself up yet"
    "this video has your 72 virgins in it!"

    1. Re:Subject by 6Yankee · · Score: 2, Funny

      "this video has your 72 virgins in it!"

      The promise of 72 virgins is a powerful motivator, but nowhere does it say they won't all be male Slashdotters.

  34. smoke grenade by whathappenedtomonday · · Score: 1
    As a number of posters have pointed out, this is hardly feasible. The proposed "Bundestrojaner" (federal trojan) legislation is most likely unconstitutional and has been struck down in one federal state already for exactly that reason. (Large parts of) The social democratic coalition partner SPD and the opposition as well as civil rights groups and trade associations deny the need for such practices and question that it would be in any way reconcilable with the constitution.


    The proposition is part of a much larger bill granting the BKA (federal police) extensive new powers with large-scale privacy and civil rights implications. The BKA bill is not really discussed in public, because the minister of the interior and other shills distract both the public and the mainstream media with Bundestrojaner dumbspeak that has no technical knowledge or feasible background whatsoever. Most other parts of the BKA bill would have caused hundreds of thousands of concerned citizens hit the streets some 15 or 20 years ago, but go largely unnoticed because of the Bundestrojaner smoke grenade. (And the claim that whoever opposes the bill will have to take the responsibility for the victims of coming terrorist attacks.)

    --
    I hope I didn't brain my damage.
    1. Re:smoke grenade by cpghost · · Score: 1

      Most other parts of the BKA bill would have caused hundreds of thousands of concerned citizens hit the streets some 15 or 20 years ago, but go largely unnoticed because of the Bundestrojaner smoke grenade. (And the claim that whoever opposes the bill will have to take the responsibility for the victims of coming terrorist attacks.)

      Yes, indeed. But that's not the only reason, neither is it limited to Germany. In all western countries, people have grown very passive w.r.t. increased government surveilliance for quite some time now (starting even before 9/11). Actually, most seem even to welcome that very idea. The frog is already being boiled to death, and still not taking notice. It won't jump out now; it's already way too late. Why is that so? Perhaps because the current generation "24" role models have shifted, and most of us didn't grow up under a dictatorship to know what it's like.

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
  35. Re:Click here for hot beach babes! by spywhere · · Score: 1

    Click here for hot sexy Israeli babes frolicking on the beach! Satisfaction guaranteed!

    Fixed that for you.

    This is the problem with our War on Terror: we assume our enemies are dumber than our parents.

  36. Re:Too bad Angela Merkel is also computer illitera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is that going to help necessarily?

    Dunno, but it's not very helpful, either, if the German minister of justice answers when asked by a bunch of kids what browser she uses "Um, what exactly was a browser again?".

  37. Anti-hacking law? by dmclap · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Didn't Germany recently pass a law banning most "hacking" tools, and by extension, most tools that can be used to detect and defeat hacking? And if so, could these be related? I sincerely hope not, since if so, someone (or multiple persons) in the German government is outclassing the Bush administration in asshole terrorism laws. Suspected of terrorism? Get a trojan. Try to detect/remove the trojan? Break the law and get sent to jail anyway!

    Yes, I know that it can be a stretch to say that no hacking tools means you can't still defeat this trojan, but maybe they could either create a trojan that could only be defeated that way, or just expand the law in later years to make it illegal to use anti-virus software "in a way that interferes with a government investigation" or something. Either way, it could lead to some scary stuff if properly abused. Even if you don't start the cycle of getting sent to prison, a trojan can dig up some nice information about enemies of yours.

    1. Re:Anti-hacking law? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You assume that everyone uses a local email client, rather than just webmail (gmail).

    2. Re:Anti-hacking law? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Proof of drive-by rootkit installation? If it had happened, it would have been found out.

    3. Re:Anti-hacking law? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet another conspiracy theory with no evidence posted by HomelessInLaJolla.

      Get a job, loser.

  38. Terrorists? by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

    1001 Tips for the Indoor Gardener: Tip # 899
    Don't let your computer tattle on you. If you have your computer situated in your growroom, make sure that no videocam or still digital camera has a clear view of your plants, especially if you have received emails from Germany.

  39. just to remind you by AlgorithMan · · Score: 0

    just to remind you: At that time Hitler took control of Germany by spreading fear of terrorism (after a staged terrorist attack on the Reichstag). He got all the power he needed for his "war on terror"... soon the word "terrorist" included jews and anyone who disagreed with the NSDAP

    right now I really hate living in Germany
    SOMEBODY HELP US!!!

    --
    The MAFIAA is a bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first up against the wall when the revolution comes
  40. Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Terrorists read Digg, not Slashdot.

    So... the terrorists want us to elect Ron Paul?

    *head explodes*

  41. They won't use email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their troian will be installed with "physical access". They sneak into their homes.

  42. Not about terrorism, never has been by davinc · · Score: 1, Insightful

    As a fellow I read long ago commented on his first hand life under the Nazis... It is all part of the current trend in all western culture for government to pass ARBITRARY and INVASIVE laws that condition people to unchecked use of power. This is utterly useless against 'terrorists', since if they even exist they would just avoid it. This is entirely about wearing down opposition to government power. Here in the US these abuses come at us faster than we have time to get outraged about them.

  43. "terror suspects" by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ya, that label will never be abused.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  44. So they have developed Time-Travel Email? by MrSteveSD · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought the Trojans were wiped out long ago.

  45. They'll never make it. by WheelDweller · · Score: 1

    Troy's email's been down *forever*. And when it wasn't, that tramp Helen was sniffing all the packets, anyway. :)

    (Ya gotta love headlines, from time to time...)

    "SUV breaks from the crowd and kills 5". (Or, perhaps a DRIVER of an SUV went out of control and killed five, no? See what I mean?

    --
    --- For a good time mail uce@ftc.gov
  46. Latest News: German Government outlaws non-Windows by udippel · · Score: 1

    In a recent move, Angela Merkel has forced an amendment to the liberty laws through Der Bundestag. It is from now on prohibited to use any operating system that is non-trivial to break into.
    German police have started to do house-to-house searches of Internet users reported to be not hackable by the Security Services (SS) of the Federal Government. First images can be seen on http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=9db_1178813405

    More action is to follow soon, the Minister of Information of the Federal Government, who only wanted to be known by his initials, JG, confirmed:
    "We have outlawed the use and ownership of any so-called security tool, to liberate Germans from FUD, Fear Uncertainty and Danger. We have outlawed any operating system that hinders the proper execution of the tasks of the SS." He promised to follow up on speculations of setting up a re-education camp for deviant Internet users in Bergen-Belsen. He asked the reporter to supply his e-mail address, in order to deliver the adequate response into her mailbox as soon as that response was ready.

  47. tttro jjjan troojans!!! by splatter · · Score: 1


    This is ludicrous, no this is Germany!!!!!

    --
    "(I) have this unfortunate condition that causes me not to believe a single thing any politician says when a mic's on.
  48. Re:Click here for hot beach babes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope. The problem is that you assume there are meaningful enemies in the first place.

    There are much bigger and more important issues in the world than the occasional act of terrorism. I don't understand why everyone is so hung-up over "stopping" terrorists, and why no one has worked that it's not possible.

  49. Whaa? by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

    Emailing the Trojans? At first I said "Bernie,", I said, "that can't be right, they'll never accept the messages, they don't even have SMTP servers in those days!", but then I realized they're so crazy, they'd accept anything, even a giant wooden horse if somebody ever built one!

    1. Re:Whaa? by fritsd · · Score: 1

      Maybe they could have extended RFC 1149 to wooden horses?

      --
      To be, or not to be: isn't that quite logical, Slashdot Beta?
  50. seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you seriously think that in the age of illegal wiretapping and sending people to Guantanamo without due process, the US government isn't also trying to bug people's computers?

    1. Re:seriously by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Do we care? What the Us is doing is Somebody Else's Problem (TM).

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  51. webmail !? by udippel · · Score: 1

    ... and in the next move, Google and Yahoo will be forced to shut down their mail filtering capabilities in order to expediate the delivery of trojaned mails to Tora Bora.

    "Intelligence is constant. Only the number of humans increases." Rapidly, as we can make out.

  52. Actually, the artillery DOES pay for damage by crovira · · Score: 2, Informative

    caused by an errant shell.

    Well in peace time anyway.

    I had a sister who lived in Lawton OK for a long time and a few random shells made way from the artillery range from time to time.

    That's why they fire duds. The damage is limited to a small diameter.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
    1. Re:Actually, the artillery DOES pay for damage by dbrutus · · Score: 1

      Thank you for pointing out, at least indirectly, the problem with most of the commentary here. All the self-righteous protests assume we're at peace. We're not. We're in a type of war that's both new (cyberwar) and very old (pre-westphalian rules). It's going to get very, very ugly and a lot of institutions, including apparently the FRG government are confused as to what the new rules are.

  53. Re:Too bad Angela Merkel is also computer illitera by someone1234 · · Score: 1

    The problem is movies about computers. These movies depict cracking as easy as hitting a few keys.
    Passwords could be found on an alien system in like 10 minutes by trying,
    Viruses contain more graphical elements than 'useful' payload, etc.

    --
    Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
  54. Godwin! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm surprised it took so long...

  55. If I knew they weren't serious.. by Duncan+Blackthorne · · Score: 1
    ..it'd be hilarious. As is it's just plain sad, and somewhat infuriating.

    So, what, Spybot S&D, Adaware, (etc), and any decent antivirus application are going to be outlawed, or worse, compromised to ignore their tame spyware trojans? Or do they think that they've got such good programming talent on the government dole, that they can create spyware that won't be tagged by any of the above? I think not.

    Maybe they should go collaborate with Sony, since Sony is so up-to-date on rootkit technology. :p

    Bastards.

  56. Re: You have GOT to be kidding me. by rts008 · · Score: 1

    Uhmmm...How 'bout an old computer game?

    (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spy_vs._Spy_(compute r_game))

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  57. Chinese beat them to it ... by foobsr · · Score: 1

    German gov't PCs hacked; China offers to investigate — Trojan horse programs were found on a number of computers

    Quote(August 27, 2007):"Security experts from Germany's Federal Office for Information Security (BSI) and Federal Data Protection Office discovered Trojan horse programs in computers used in several government ministries, including the Foreign Ministry, the Ministry of Economics and the Research and Development Ministry, as well as Merkel's office, Der Spiegel reported."

    *grins diabolically*

    CC.

    --
    TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
  58. Germany to INVADE Poland, and UK and Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So basically Germany will invade the computers of people in Poland, Czech Republic, Italy, France....

    Ahh, but it's totally cool, because those people are suspected *ists, so it's being done to protect the fatherland from these ists.

  59. thanks for writing this... by schwarzepfote · · Score: 1

    Thanks for writing out what was on my mind since I read the headline.

    Andreas

  60. Re: lol man.. but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Governments have to bypass spam-filters too

    Maybe the subject is 'd!d you kn0w the pr0m!s3d vi'rg!ns are male /.Rs'

  61. MOD PARENT DOWN - spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not quite sure what a spam site about stopping telemarketers has to do with the FBI emailing trojans, but there you go.

  62. Open zee email, by iminplaya · · Score: 1

    old man.

    --
    What?
  63. AMERIKA SENDS AN IDEA TO GERMANY ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, is this something right out of the George Bush idiots field manual? I apologize for our country to all non-US residents. This is just one more idea to stem the "War on Terror". It does three primary things. It invades a citizens privacy, it gives someone who aparently has nothing to do everyday something meaningless to do, and it won't work because whoever thought of this idea has his or her head up their arse! Oww Oww - send 'em a trojan so we can take a peek at their secret computer files. Brilliant!
    And so dumb I don't know why I ever read any of this to begin with.

  64. No, it is NOT an email attachment by Esel+Theo · · Score: 1

    It is quite surprising how long the rumor keeps circulating that the German BKA plans to send its trojan as an email attachment. Of course, those folks are not that stupid.
    What they is actually going to happen is that they will most likely break into a suspects house the conventional secret service style. During such a visit, they will figure out the best approach to place the trojan on the suspects machine. Then, they will tailor-make the trojan for this specific machine. Different methods are conceivable to actually place the trojan onto the machine. Could be a second break-in into the apartment -- or indeed an email attachment. What they will definitely not do is send random-guess emails that depend on the suspect's stupidity.
    See http://www.focus.de/digital/computer/chip-exklusiv /chip-exklusiv_aid_68603.html (in German) for some information.
    In that light, what is happening in Germany is actually not that new. Spy equipment is being used since ages. It is only a little step to also cover suspects' PCs -- and it is happening most likely already today and in many countries.

  65. Re:Too bad Angela Merkel is also computer illitera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She has a PhD in physics.

  66. OT by l0cust · · Score: 1

    Internet Explorer's CSS rendering: WYSIWTF
    One of the funniest sigs ever. Thanks for the laugh. :)
    --
    Politicians and Pedophiles: Two groups of exploitive bastards who are most dangerous when they're thinking of children.
  67. Real smart..... by MortenMW · · Score: 0

    This sounds real smart. I never open any attachments I get in my inbox unless I know exactly what it is and who sent it to me. I also run Linux, so I can't really see any huge problems even if I would open such an attachment. This was probably proposed by some desk-jockey who has read "Computing for dummies".