Slashdot Mirror


Judge Strikes Down Part of Patriot Act

Shining Celebi writes "U.S. District Judge Victor Marrero ruled in favor of the ACLU and struck down a portion of the revised USA PATRIOT Act this morning, forcing investigators to go through the courts to obtain approval before ordering ISPs to give up information on customers, instead of just sending them a National Security Letter. In the words of Judge Marrero, this use of National Security Letters 'offends the fundamental constitutional principles of checks and balances and separation of powers.'"

17 of 673 comments (clear)

  1. I, for one... by Telephone+Sanitizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our newly Constitutionally-conscious judicial overlords.

  2. Wow by nizo · · Score: 4, Funny
    In the words of Judge Marrero, this use of National Security Letters "offends the fundamental constitutional principles of checks and balances and separation of powers."


    Where is the "nodamnkidding" tag when you need it?

  3. Re:It's a good start by Wandering+Wombat · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, you're too dumb to use your freedoms properly. You should THANK your appointed officials for deciding the best way for you to go about your daily life.

    --
    I like to place meaningful quotes in my sig, so people will know that I know what meaningful quotes are.
  4. Re:Translating the Judge's Statement by Ant+P. · · Score: 2, Funny

    WTF kind of translation is that? English to AOL?

  5. In totally unrelated news... by KingSkippus · · Score: 4, Funny

    In completely unrelated news, U.S. District Judge Victor Marrero has been arrested as an enemy combatant who hates freedom as is currently on an airplane in transit to Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, where he will be held indefinitely. Ironically, it is unlikely that this judge will ever see his own day in court.

    President Bush has issued a signing statement declaring that the principles of checks and balances and separation of powers is unConstitutional, since "Clearly the executive branch of government is over the other two, or else they wouldn't have called it the 'executive' branch." Dick Cheney couldn't be reached for comment to see which branch of government he is part of today.

  6. Re:Translating the Judge's Statement by SkunkPussy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't you mean, "Their taking are jobs!!!!"

    No, wait.....

    --
    SURELY NOT!!!!!
  7. Re:It's a good start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    That wooshing sound you hear is the sarcasm from the GP post zipping by over your head...

  8. Re:Should not have been a judge in the first place by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm tired of activist judges who ignore basic law principles simply to advance the pursuit of a future high position in the Democratic Party.

    Giving a swiff of Zyklon B to all the democrats would already take care of 90% of the problems in America right now..


    Who let Ann Coulter on /.?
    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  9. Re:Now for Congress by pthor1231 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Holy crap. Assuming that wiki page isn't lying, which would be hard to pull off with some of the hawks watching political pages, that is pretty amazing. A politician with balls as big as maddox's.

  10. Karma Whore Alert by goldspider · · Score: 3, Funny

    insight
    -noun 1. an instance of apprehending the true nature of a thing, esp. through intuitive understanding

    People here have been rolling out that tired quote for the past six years. Posting it verbatim no longer qualifies as "insightful" IMO.

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
  11. Re:Absolutely shameless plug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Up or down?

  12. Re:Absolutely shameless plug by truesaer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Thank god the IIJ is there to protect a homeless methhead's right to do medical care on horses without a license. Godbless them!

  13. Re:The Judicial system: Freedom versus Tyranny by MightyMartian · · Score: 2, Funny

    That is also the only way to get back to a merely legitimate government -- one based on laws actually passed by representatives of the people. You might want to consider supporting Fred. Watching his announcement speech online, it struck me that he's the first plausible presidential candidate I can remember actually openly advocating restoring the constitution balance of power between the federal government and the states.


    BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

    This is the lunatic that vows he's going to ban abortion, and you think he's advocating anything serious? Please. He's a late-comer with about as much chance of sitting in the Oval Office as you. Sure, he may fool the far-right lunatics that have thus far absolutely destroyed the Republican Party, but take my word for it, the GOP wants to actually have a shot at winning an election. It doesn't need this guy.

    Oh yeah, and Law and Order sucks with him on it.
    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  14. Re:It's a good start by Some_Llama · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sorry i'm so used to living near the airport i thought it was just another 757.

  15. Re:It's a good start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Well, your freedoms need to be kept in a safe place until the government determines that it is safe for you to use them again.

  16. Re:It's a good start by DavidShor · · Score: 1, Funny

    I happen to agree with some of what you're saying, but for God's sake, write a bit more formally. Stop using "..."'s, capitalize your "i"'s, and at least spell out the easier words.

  17. Re:No Chile Left Behind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I for one welcome our Peruvian overlords.