Slashdot Mirror


Jack Thompson Sends Subpoena to Bush

Ariastis writes "Jack Thompson has filed documents with a federal court in Florida requesting to subpoena President George W. Bush for a deposition to retain Thompson's license to practice law. Ah, and Jeb Bush too, for good measure."

42 of 273 comments (clear)

  1. I'm torn by Trigun · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is the enemy of my enemy my friend, or is he still an asshole?

    1. Re:I'm torn by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 5, Funny

      Something's on the tip of my tongue...

      turd... polish... still a turd...

      no, it's gone

    2. Re:I'm torn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      >Is the enemy of my enemy my friend, or is he still an asshole?

      Uh...which "he"?

    3. Re:I'm torn by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Funny

      The enemy of your enemy is usually also your enemy too.

      And if you don't believe that, then we should get a group together to play Risk. For money.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    4. Re:I'm torn by Prien715 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The enemy of your enemy is someone you can use against your enemy, and then steamroll later when his/her defenses are down. Best friend I ever had=)

      --
      -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
    5. Re:I'm torn by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Funny

      See, I'm not inviting you to my Risk game since you already know my strategy.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    6. Re:I'm torn by Poltras · · Score: 3, Funny

      turd... polish... still a turd...
      What the hell has a turd from Poland anything to do with the on-hand topic? This is serious!
    7. Re:I'm torn by dcclark · · Score: 4, Funny

      In the words of a friend,

      The enemy of my enemy is... a low priority!

    8. Re:I'm torn by Chris+Burke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But see you've reversed the implication. That's "My friend is an enemy of my enemy" and that's normally true. If you assumed the other guy was your "friend" for no reason other than that he was also my enemy, you'd be setting yourself up for an unpleasant surprise.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    9. Re:I'm torn by Chris+Burke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'll admit chance plays a significant role in Risk, but if you really believe that, try using the dice to decide where you place your armies and what countries to attack and I'd beat you 100% of the time.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    10. Re:I'm torn by aichpvee · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Slashdot: nearly a million monkeys, but still no Hamlet."

      Give us forever, we'll get there eventually.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    11. Re:I'm torn by DotWarner · · Score: 3, Funny

      Never polish a turd on the tip of your tongue.

    12. Re:I'm torn by Jarik_Tentsu · · Score: 4, Funny

      I wonder how this will play out...

      Jack: Mr. Bush, multiplayer kill-simulators are training young children to become killers.
      Bush: Kill...simulators?
      Jack: Yes. An example would be Counter-strike, where a player can be counter-terrorist or terrorist-
      Bush: TERRORIST!
      Jack: Yes, yes. Terrorist. And they play over the internet-
      Bush: The internets? Do they use The Google?
      JacK: Uhh...I'm sure they do...
      Bush: So The Google and the Internets are related to terrorists!
      Jack: Well, no...
      Bush: Put me through to Homeland Security! Every person found using the Internets will be taken into custody!
      Jack: Not what I was looking for...but works either way.

      ~Jarik

    13. Re:I'm torn by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Depends on who you are. If you're the US, the enemy of your enemy is someone you arm and hope that he hates your enemy more than you.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  2. Rotaderp .sv Neila by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's sorta like Alien vs. Predator, but backwards. Whoever loses, we win.

  3. wow - Bush AND Thompson in the same story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I bet you Slashbots are just foaming at the mouth.

    1. Re:wow - Bush AND Thompson in the same story by Jarjarthejedi · · Score: 4, Funny

      And it has to insult linux, call evolution a fake, and then be found out to all be the working of the RIAA, funded by Sony who is working for the CIA. Then you'd have a lot of angry /.er...or at least angrier than normal...

      --
      There are two kinds of fool One says 'This is old therefore good' Another says 'This is new therefore better'- Dean Ing
  4. i said it before, i'll say it again... by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Insightful

    jack thompson: greatest troll who ever lived

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:i said it before, i'll say it again... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      jack thompson: greatest troll who ever lived Perhaps we can build a bridge to nowhere for him to live under?
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  5. The Time Is Approaching by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The time is approaching when someone is going to have to put this guy in the nut house. I hope all those self-serving pandering politicians who like to align themselves with Thompson against the invented evils of video games start seriously considering the kind of delusional maniac they've decided is their ally.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    1. Re:The Time Is Approaching by Leftist+Troll · · Score: 5, Funny

      The time is approaching when someone is going to have to put this guy in the nut house.

      I agree, but we need to do something about that Thompson guy too.

    2. Re:The Time Is Approaching by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Funny

      as long as that idiot is doing his baboon act on television on a regular basis everyone will point, laugh, and ignore No, no, he was talking about Thompson.
  6. Re:Prepare for cranial explosions! by mconeone · · Score: 5, Funny

    My guess is that it's to prove that if Bush can be completely incompetent and misguided as President, then Thompson has the right to do so as a lawyer.

  7. Subpoena as evidence? by R2.0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ok, now that I've trolled in another post, I'm wondering if the folks trying to get him kicked out of the Bar could enter the subpoena ITSELF as evidence of JT's unfitness to practice law.

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    1. Re:Subpoena as evidence? by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Ok, now that I've trolled in another post, I'm wondering if the folks trying to get him kicked out of the Bar could enter the subpoena ITSELF as evidence of JT's unfitness to practice law.


      I don't know if it can be directly referenced or not. Is it necessary? The guy's record speaks for itself. This delicious piece of irony is just icing on the cake.

      I'm more concerned about his fitness to walk down the street. I really do think Thompson is completely out of his mind. I think what's needed after the disbarment is a 30 day psychiatric review in a closed facility. Maybe there's some meds they can give him.
      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Subpoena as evidence? by Darby · · Score: 3, Funny

      .Maybe there's some meds they can give him.

      KCN perhaps?

  8. sounds to me by to_kallon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Jack is currently suing the mediator, Judge Dava Tunis, along with the Florida Supreme Court and the Florida Bar.

    like he's a lawyer, alright...

    --


    The only way to get rid of a temptation is to yield to it.
    -Oscar Wilde
    1. Re:sounds to me by forkazoo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Suing the person that's meant to be mediating the dispute is taking things a little far, even for him... If he keeps suing the judges and courts, who's going to finally judge the case, and where? If you want to use the legal system to your advantage, you can't sue it... I would have thought a lawyer would realise that.


      AFAIR, this won't be Jack' first time filing against a judge in one of his cases. Whenever he doesn't like a judge, he has convinced himself that suing the judge will result in a conflict of interest, and force the judge to recuse himself, allowing him to arbitrarily judge-shop until he finds somebody he thinks will kow-tow to his bullshit for fear of being sued.

      Unfortunately for Jack, there is no clear precedent requiring a judge to recuse himself if he gets sued by someone involved in a case he is judging. Naturally, this is because such a precedent would enable exactly what Jack wants. IIRC, the last judge he sued didn't recuse himself because of being sued, but eventually did recuse himself because there was a conflict of interest arising from the fact that the judge was filing a formal complaint about Jack being an asshat.
  9. What if.... ha... you almost had me there. by 0p7imu5_P2im3 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Then he'll make elaborate laws that restrict our rights with promises that it will stop video game-ism, only to have video games become better at hiding, stockpiling weapons, and money laundering.

    --
    Resistance is futile. Your technological distinctiveness will be added to our own. You will become one with the morgue
  10. Re:Prepare for cranial explosions! by Mattintosh · · Score: 3, Informative

    Bar associations are not courts. They're unions for lawyers. You can sue unions. You can sue bar associations.

  11. Re:WORST ... SLASHDOT ... STORY ... EVER by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Get off your high horse. Jack Thompson is of interest around here, because of his links to the anti-gaming lobby. It's Friday, it's a hilarious story, and we're all enjoying it. You know who Thompson is, if you have been around for a while. That's like asking "Which Bill Gates? How should I know?"

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  12. At least.. by CokeJunky · · Score: 4, Insightful

    he can claim that gaming has driven at least one person to raving lunacy... Himself! (at least in my personal opinion.)

    --
    More Caffeine. NOW
  13. Re:WORST ... SLASHDOT ... STORY ... EVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You must be new here.

  14. Re:Prepare for cranial explosions! by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Informative
    Try again, this time understanding something about the structure of the court system in Florida. The Florida Bar is an agent of the Supreme Court of Florida:

    Article V, Section 15 of the Constitution of the State of Florida gives the Supreme Court of Florida exclusive and ultimate authority to regulate the admission of persons to the practice of law and the discipline of those persons who are admitted to practice. The Court performs those official functions through two separate arms: the Florida Board of Bar Examiners , which screens, tests and certifies candidates for admission to the practice; and The Florida Bar, the investigative and prosecutorial authority in the lawyer regulatory process. Neither of these two agencies, nor any of their functions, is supported by state tax dollars
    (source)


  15. Re:WORST ... SLASHDOT ... STORY ... EVER by eln · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That's a really nice rant, and I agree with you somewhat in your general assertion that Slashdot has drifted pretty far away from being a nerd site (WTF is up with the Politics section, for example). However, I have some issues:

    1.) I haven't been around quite as long as you have, but I don't recall the slogan ever being "News for Nerds on the Stuff that Matters". That may have been the original intent, but I don't think that was ever the actual slogan. The oldest page from Slashdot I could find on web.archive.org is from November, 1998, which was prior to the Andover.net buyout (thereby presumably before the major corporate influence began). On that page, the slogan is "News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters."

    Now, I grant you, prior to maybe 5 or 6 years ago, the "stuff that matters FOR NERDS" was sort of implied, but that hasn't really been the case for a long, long time.

    2.) Jack Thompson has been going after the gaming industry for a long time. Seeing his long, slow descent into madness is of great interest to gaming nerds, even if not to you particularly. Even if you decide that the site should be limited only to things that the typical nerd would care about (not your decision or mine to make), this still would fit that category.

    So, even though I agree with you that Slashdot in general has strayed pretty far from its roots (but what site this old hasn't), I disagree with you about this particular story.

  16. One good send deserves another by NJVil · · Score: 4, Funny

    George Bush sends Jack Thompson to Guantanamo

  17. Perfect lesson in english usage by swordgeek · · Score: 4, Funny

    Someone asked me the other day about the difference between psychotic and psychopathic. Here it is laid out nicely.

    The psychotic Jack Thompson is sending a subpoena to the psychopathic George Bush.

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  18. It's clear who Bush needs to defend him... by Runefox · · Score: 4, Funny

    Phoenix Wright, Ace Attorney!

    --
    Screw the rules, I have green hair!
  19. Duck Hunt by wiredlogic · · Score: 5, Funny

    Jack better watch out. Some of out government officials have already been trained on violent video games. I hear Cheney is pretty good at Duck Hunt.

    --
    I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
  20. It makes me wonder, though by Moraelin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It makes me wonder, though. Schizophrenia quite often starts mild, debatably sane, and progresses over time to padded-room calibre. Just because at some point you might look like just a bit eccentric or slightly bizarre or a bit of a bad case of cognitive dissonance, doesn't mean that 17 years later you can't be diagnosed with proper schizophrenia.

    And this guy's delusions started from half-way between mildly annoying and mildly funny, and progressed to outright bizarre. I can't diagnose him anyway, but it makes me, you know, wonder. Maybe a second examination would find it a bit worse than the one almost 2 decades ago? It's a possibility.

    Plus, to the best of my knowledge, a lot (most?) doctors tend to prefer to err on the conservative side, especially when it would bury someone's career. If slapping a "yup, he's schizophrenic" label on him would terminate his right to act as a lawyer, even temporarily, they'll give him a lot of benefit of the doubt. He'd pretty much have to be at the raving lunatic stage to get that. It's just a different standard. Even if you'd consider giving him neuroleptics in a private consultation, you'd have to be convinced that he's to deranged to do his job to actually slap that on his dossier.

    Plus, in that kind of context, I figure it's hard to diagnose anyway. Noone will start telling you about the voices in his head, when he's sent there to determine whether he's fit to keep working and doing his crusade. Being insane carries a major stigma. So unless they're deranged past the point of hiding it, a lot of people _will_ try to hide it, if you just send them to a psychiatrist. They might admit stuff to their therapist if it was their idea to go there, and it's going to be kept secret. But not to the guy who has to determine whether they're fit to keep their job, and whose conclusion will probably be public record.

    What I'm trying to say is that it's entirely possible that he just slipped through the cracks the first time. (_If_ he's indeed nuts.) There's no telling if he'd still pass after all this time.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  21. No excuse for torture. by Txiasaeia · · Score: 3, Insightful
    There's no excuse for one human being to torture another. There's no reason to joke about it, either. Jack should be stripped of his ability to practice law in the United States, but being an obnoxious and pedantic lawyer isn't a reason to deprive him of his basic human rights and inflict pain on him. In fact, there's no reason why torture should be acceptable in the 21st century world.

    Human Rights Watch

    --
    Condemnant quod non intellegunt.