Slashdot Mirror


PHP5 Vs. CakePHP Vs. RubyOnRails?

OldJavaHack writes "If you could start a website (with MySQL for persistence) from scratch and you had a choice of PHP5, CakePHP, or RubyOnRails — which would you choose and why? Things to consider in your decision: 1. Maturity of solution; 2. Features; 3. Size of community of skilled users (to build a team); 4. Complexity/ease of use (for neophytes to master); 5. Greatest strength of your choice, and the greatest weaknesses of the other two. Here is a comparison of capabilities."

16 of 469 comments (clear)

  1. Sure by dedazo · · Score: 3, Funny
    1. PHP: What people build real websites with.
    2. RoR: What people build websites with because they want to be kewl and later switch to PHP when they realize it simply does not scale, complete with acerbic "I wanted to believe" blog entry and everything

    Next?

    --
    Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    1. Re:Sure by NickCatal · · Score: 5, Funny

      And the award to the quickest troll in the world goes to......

      --
      -nick
    2. Re:Sure by king-manic · · Score: 4, Funny



            1. PHP: What people build real websites with.
            2. RoR: What people build websites with because they want to be kewl and later switch to PHP when they realize it simply does not scale, complete with acerbic "I wanted to believe" blog entry and everything

      Next?


      Pfft.. Real men code websites in Java and ASP. Scalability and performance are for pussies. My server to chugs at 10 hits/minute and it likes it.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    3. Re:Sure by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 5, Funny

      And the award to the quickest troll in the world goes to......

      kdawson, for posting this absolute shit as an IT story with nothing more than a link to a wikipedia article in the summary!

      Congratulations!

      Hey, kdawson, while you're reading this, can I just grease you up about a story I want to post about how Steam will replace electricity to power the electric kettles of the future? Thanks buddy!

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    4. Re:Sure by jamesh · · Score: 4, Funny

      Pfft.. Real men code websites in Java and ASP.

      I think Real Men would be more likely to build the web server and TCP stack into their web sites, for performance reasons.

      At least that's what we did in my day.

      *cough*
    5. Re:Sure by speaker+of+the+truth · · Score: 3, Funny

      And the award to the quickest troll in the world goes to......
      --
      -nick [nickcatalano.com] Wow, I've never seen such an honest troll before. My hat off to you sir.
      --
      Using openSUSE instead of Windows since 9th of October, 2007 and liking it.
    6. Re:Sure by VirusEqualsVeryYes · · Score: 4, Funny

      this absolute shit [for] an IT story [has] nothing more than a link to a wikipedia article in the summary!
      Not to worry, you will be cured of your tendency to RTFA soon. Welcome to Slashdot.
    7. Re:Sure by Da+Fokka · · Score: 3, Funny

      You fool! Can't you see kdawson is just an evil ploy by CmdrTaco to become more popular! By contrast, his submissions seem like an insightful breeze.

    8. Re:Sure by oliderid · · Score: 3, Funny

      Real men don't use web server. Real men reply to HTTP GET requests manually. For security reasons.

    9. Re:Sure by GrievousMistake · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sure, just log in, go to preferences -> homepage, and uncheck the box that says 'kdawson'. The slashdot admins will instantly take notice of your preference and kick him of the team, and with any luck you'll never hear from him again.

      --
      In a fair world, refrigerators would make electricity.
  2. ... Robots in disguise ... More than meets the eye by poopdeville · · Score: 3, Funny

    Great, a link to a wikipedia article. Wonderful.

    --
    After all, I am strangely colored.
  3. PHP5 by mrjb · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... because I know it and I know it does the job. Also saves me the work of figuring out what CakePHP and RoR is.

    --
    Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
  4. Re:Python and Django by August+Lilleaas · · Score: 3, Funny

    Python is a much cleaner language than both PHP and Ruby

    ...said egrinake, the God that Decides Which Language that Rocks More.

  5. Re:Ruby On Rails: Size of community of skilled use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    www.workingwithrails.com = 500: Internal Server Error

    Hmmmm...

  6. Re:I learned PHP once by quag7 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think your problem is you don't do enough coding in seedy desert motels doing lines off of methamphetamine-crazed prostitutes, with a tubfull of radiator moonshine, a closet of AR-15 knockoffs and the latest high capacity polymer-grip Europistols, balancing towers of ice buckets full of jacketed hollowpoints.

    You probably sit in some comfortable chair in an air conditioned office somewhere going, "oh, oh, globals, oh no, don't hack me, please!"

    Some of us are too busy balancing our RAD needs while fighting off bikini-clad ninja chicks with harpoons and barbed-wire dildoes to be concerned to get our panties in a bunch over globals.

    Please, you're standing on my dick.

  7. Getting a Rails server up and running in 5 minut by patio11 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Use Deprec (www.deprec.org I think) on a clean Ubuntu install. Seriously, when I found it it was almost a religious experience (and we're talking Baptist-esque rolling in the aisles and PRAISE HIM! OH! religion here).