Slashdot Mirror


Cassini's Iapetus Flyby

cupofjoe writes "The Jet Propulsion Laboratory is reporting on the Cassini spacecraft's recent close flyby of the Saturnian moon Iapetus, highlighting images taken from distances 100 times closer than the Voyager 2 flyby in 1981. Near real-time images were shown to Cassini mission team members in a presentation at JPL yesterday, during which a pre-recorded message from Arthur C. Clarke was played to the audience. Clarke wished them luck on the flyby, reminding all present that he had included a pretty accurate description of Iapetus in the original 1968 text of "2001: A Space Odyssey", years before Voyager made its flyby."

69 comments

  1. I'm not BadPunGuy by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    But I'd love to hear the impetus to check out Iapetus after taking that turn at Saturn. The tan tie of Titan and...

    Oh fuck off. I haven't slept in days.

    1. Re:I'm not BadPunGuy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cassini? Ca-seen-it the first time when it was called Goodfellas.

  2. Odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    The spacecraft went into safe mode for the first time in four years directly after the Iapetus survey. NASA blames in on a cosmic ray. I think aliens have just captured the spacecraft and deleted/faked the important data.

    1. Re:Odd by scoot80 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they reckon that the safing event was caused by "a solid state power switch that was tripped due to a galactic cosmic ray hit," but really, it was most likely an alien which tripped and fell on the switch. (After downloading fake data through a floppy disk)

    2. Re:Odd by Cassius+Corodes · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe it wasn't shut down properly last time?

      --
      Control is an illusion, order our comforting lie. From chaos, through chaos, into chaos we fly
    3. Re:Odd by RuBLed · · Score: 1

      Yup, scanning bad sectors out there would definitely take time...

      (3-4 days in TFR)

    4. Re:Odd by haystor · · Score: 1

      The AE-35 unit needs servicing.

      --
      t
    5. Re:Odd by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Funny
      The good news: the probe took pictures from 100 times closer than Voyager.

      The bad news: all the pictures came back at 640x480 resolution with 4-bit color depth, and had the words "Safe Mode" superimposed over each of the four corners.

  3. Good ol' ACC... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Clarke wished them luck on the flyby, reminding all present that he had included a pretty accurate description of Iapetus in the original 1968 text of "2001: A Space Odyssey", years before Voyager made its flyby.
    Just in case they forgot it wasn't all about them...
    1. Re:Good ol' ACC... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Especially as he didn't predict anything too extraordinary about Iapetus.

      If he's right about life on Europa though, that would be much more impressive. Which is why it was strange he's not lobbying for a Europa mission. It's not as if life on Europa is impossible, in fact it seems quite plausible.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    2. Re:Good ol' ACC... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Probably because we should attempt no landings there.

  4. Pretty accurate description of Iapetus? by nacturation · · Score: 5, Insightful
    That's not how I read it. FTA:

    This is a particularly exciting moment for fans of 2001: A Space Odyssey - because that's where the lone astronaut Dave Bowman discovers the Saturn monolith, which turns out to be a gateway to the stars. Chapter 35 in the novel is titled 'The Eye of Iapetus', and it contains this passage:

            "Iapetus was approaching so slowly that it scarcely seemed to move, and it was impossible to tell the exact moment when it made the subtle change from an astronomical body to a landscape, only fifty miles below. The faithful verniers gave their last spurts of thrust, then closed down forever. The ship was in its final orbit, completing a revolution every three hours at a mere eight hundred miles an hour - all the speed that was required in this feeble gravitation field."

    After more than 40 years, I cannot remember why I placed the Saturn monolith on Iapetus. The submitter makes it sound like a boast but in reality it's simply saying that enthusiasts will appreciate the reference.
    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    1. Re:Pretty accurate description of Iapetus? by cupofjoe · · Score: 1

      The submitter makes it sound like a boast but in reality it's simply saying that enthusiasts will appreciate the reference.

      You realize, of course, that my portrayal of Mr. Clarke's message said nothing about the monolith or his choice of Iapetus as its location. I was merely referring to the fact that, as is evidenced by the text of "2001", his physical description of Iapetus is eerily accurate for the time, all things considered. Believe me, that fact has given rise to more than one website's claim of conspiracy...

      As for the perceived transitive nature of the verb "reminded"...actually, that's not how I meant it at all. I suppose I intended more to imply that the audience was reminded by inference, but in my excitement probably failed to make that clear. My bad.

      I'm also with the poster that suggests that Clarke is due a little ego-stroking now and then...


      Cheers,
      --joe.

    2. Re:Pretty accurate description of Iapetus? by nacturation · · Score: 1

      You realize, of course, that my portrayal of Mr. Clarke's message said nothing about the monolith or his choice of Iapetus as its location. I was merely referring to the fact that, as is evidenced by the text of "2001", his physical description of Iapetus is eerily accurate for the time, all things considered. Believe me, that fact has given rise to more than one website's claim of conspiracy... While the text in 2001 may have been accurate, what I was responding to was that the summary appeared to assert that he (specifically) reminded them that he described it accurately whereas in the transcript there's no mention of accuracy.

      As for the perceived transitive nature of the verb "reminded"...actually, that's not how I meant it at all. I suppose I intended more to imply that the audience was reminded by inference, but in my excitement probably failed to make that clear. My bad. No worries. You can always count on someone on /. for pedantry. :) And now that you mention it, interpreting "reminded" in that light makes it much clearer. It wasn't a direct reminder, but those who read the book were probably reminded by its mere mention.

      I'm also with the poster that suggests that Clarke is due a little ego-stroking now and then... You make it sound as if geosynchronous orbiting satellites and other concepts he pioneered were important! Yeah, I agree he's earned the right to boast now and again.
      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  5. amazing photos by cathector · · Score: 2, Interesting

    i'm at a loss to explain those inky black patches.
    wonderful photos.

    1. Re:amazing photos by sighted · · Score: 4, Informative

      One side of Iapetus is dark, the other as bright as snow. As Iapetus moves in its orbit around Saturn, the dark side faces forward, and many scientists think that the moon swept up the dark material, which might originally have come from another moon. There are some more great shots on another Planetary Society blog entry, and of course on the Cassini raw images feed from NASA.

      --
      Saddle up: Riding with Robots
    2. Re:amazing photos by cathector · · Score: 1

      huh. so the notion is that there is/was an off-surface flow of dark material around the moon, being occasionally deposited on [more or less] prominences ? i dunno. it's the dramatically sharp boundaries between the regions which leave me agog. thanks for the links.

    3. Re:amazing photos by djupedal · · Score: 1

      "...the other as bright as snow."

      Yes, that is exactly correct. You have a good eye.

      It's nice to see photos from home. It appears the family has kept things pretty much the same since I left. I can't wait to get back. I look forward to celebrating the Gostro-mik'awqgie Festiv'al with all my friends.

      I miss my home...

    4. Re:amazing photos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those 'inky black spots' as you describe them are where they keep all the toilet seats. The remaining mystery is where they keep the bishoping units.

    5. Re:amazing photos by gigantu' · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What looks dark can be bright at a different wavelength. It depends on what sensors you are using.
      Another fascinating black "thing" on Mars: http://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/PSP_003647_1745 . But in this case is just a hole in the ground.

    6. Re:amazing photos by curmudgeous · · Score: 1

      I've seen those images on TV recently. I think they're actually pictures of the new Dominoes Oreo dessert pizza.

  6. safe mode? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Cassini shutdown into safe mode... hmm didn't know it ran windows.

    1. Re:safe mode? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      yeah, though if it ran Linux, it would freeze trying to get into safe mode, and then tell you on the screen that you don't have a graphics card.

  7. Ridge. by richie2000 · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    Money for nothing, pix for free
    1. Re:Ridge. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here you can see part of the ridge that goes around Iapetus... Coincidence? I think not!
  8. Inky Stains by Trouvist · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you look closely at what they describe as "Inky Stains" on Iapetus, they look more like burst bubbles. If you consider a consistent direction for the sun's light, and look at the pictures that overlap with different shades of shadow, it looks like the surface of the satellite was covered by air pockets and they happened to either cave in or break. The edges seem slightly too jagged and defined for them to be "stains." Compare "Inky stains on a frozen moon" to "Iapetus Flyby Raw Preview #13" and you can see what I'm talking about. I don't think those are discolorations, they look like caverns.

    1. Re:Inky Stains by RuBLed · · Score: 1

      I thought it was our wall, after the rain...

    2. Re:Inky Stains by naam00 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Can't find that second image you mention, but you do realize the light direction is from below in the first one, don't you? Those are just craters, not bubbles. The 'stains' could still be holes or caves I guess, but bubbles?

    3. Re:Inky Stains by Durrok · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Those craters could be miles deep or just a few feet. The astronauts on the moon had the same misconception, grabbing rope to lower themselves down into craters thinking it was a sharp incline when in fact it was just a gentle slope. Shadows can be very deceptive.

      --
      I keep telling myself I'm not the desperate type.
    4. Re:Inky Stains by OldBus · · Score: 4, Interesting
      When I first saw the image I thought they were bubbles too. After reading your post I flipped the image 180 degrees and they were revealed as craters. Just goes to show how much our brains are wired to see light coming from the top...

      Anyway, I suspect the dark stains are probably not caves as when you enlarge the image you can see wisps of the white material on the dark stuff. It would be interesting to know if it was the dark material that caused the craters or whether whatever caused the craters revealed the dark material under the white surface.

    5. Re:Inky Stains by DrVomact · · Score: 2, Informative

      ...you do realize the light direction is from below in the first one, don't you? Those are just craters, not bubbles. The 'stains' could still be holes or caves I guess, but bubbles?

      You're absolutely right about the craters--it took me a few minutes to adjust my brain to see this picture correctly. At first, I thought the "inky stains" were on top of high spots in the terrain, but when I analyzed the way the light was falling on this scene, I realized I was falling victim to the familiar illusion where depressions in the ground (e.g. craters) can look as though they are raised.

      From the position of the "stains" in the craters, are we perhaps simply looking at bare rock where sunlight cooked off the the white stuff? The stains do seem to be located in those portions of the craters that are receiving the greatest illumination. (By the way, is this water ice we're looking at, or frozen methane, or what?)

      --
      Great men are almost always bad men--Lord Acton's Corollary
    6. Re:Inky Stains by juancnuno · · Score: 1

      Well then, how do you explain that?

    7. Re:Inky Stains by Trouvist · · Score: 1

      When you look at it on the higher-resolution image, there is fading around it, and if they were "bubbles" then that could be a pile of debris stacked inside it?

    8. Re:Inky Stains by richie2000 · · Score: 1

      If light actually falls from below in the image, it looks more like pools of black ink accumulating in the bottom of craters and your circled anomaly looks just like a small protrusion in a crater, rising above the "ink". Makes me wonder what spectrum these images actually were shot in, I'm pretty sure it's not actual colors we're seeing but rather near-IR or something.

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
  9. Neat stuff... by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 4, Informative

    Go to the "raw images" pages and look at pages 10-11, they've got some awesome "death star" pics. And images 305-320 have some "inky stains" that might make good desktops...

    1. Re:Neat stuff... by meowsqueak · · Score: 1

      Naturally, being a frequently updated image feed, the images mentioned have moved on and those references are now inaccurate.

    2. Re:Neat stuff... by sootman · · Score: 1

      How long until we get Google Iapetus?

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  10. Pictures of Iapetus, eh? by DeusExCalamus · · Score: 1

    Here's hoping it didn't blink!

    --
    "...Sleep comes like a drug in God's country Sad eyes, crooked crosses in God's country..."
    1. Re:Pictures of Iapetus, eh? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1, Funny

      Here's hoping it didn't blink!

      Much more educational for us if it does blink.

  11. I thought 2001 was a great failure! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It had no shooting, no love interest, no special effects, and hardly any dialogue. Not even one explosion! I couldn't understand what was going on half the time.

    What can you expect of a movie made in the UK? Give me Hollywood every time. They really know how to shoot a Sci-Fi epic. Look at Star Wars!

    1. Re:I thought 2001 was a great failure! by displaced80 · · Score: 1

      What can you expect of a movie made in the UK? Good point.

      *resumes watching Alien, Aliens, then Alien 3... but not Alien Resurrection... the suckiest of the Alien films and the only one not made in the UK*
      --
      What's the frequency, Kenneth?
    2. Re:I thought 2001 was a great failure! by Cragen · · Score: 2, Informative

      aarrggh, laddie. That may be why there are not so many UKs around(pronounced ooks, as opposed to Brits). One lassie escaped from Alien, 2 lassies from Aliens, &, umm... anyone from Alien3? (Loved them all! And I lived in S. Harrow (NW London) for 3 great years in the 80's!) Just saw the trailer for AVP-R last weekend. (avp-r.com) Eee-wwww. Looks good.

    3. Re:I thought 2001 was a great failure! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've got to be kidding.

      Ridley Scott's 1979 original was the only one that DIDN'T suck!

      After that they got more and more 'Hollywoodized' (gung-ho 'space marines' FFS!).

      The rest of them sucked donkey balls, although 'Resurrection' was way beyond suckiness.

      Alien is still worth watching but the rest are garbage pure and simple.

    4. Re:I thought 2001 was a great failure! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahahahaa. SW was made in the UK too... 'cept the planet scenes -- only a couple of which were done in the US

  12. Evil Face on Iapetus ! by mbone · · Score: 1

    The Evil Face on Iapetus ! (May have to squint a little to see it.) Must be angry at being disturbed.

    (And, if there are any Cydonia freaks out there, no, I don't think it's a real face. It just jumped out at me when I saw this.)

  13. moon.... by riffzifnab · · Score: 1

    Thats no moon... oh wait, yes it is. My bad.

  14. Other way around.... by mdm-adph · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Dark patches over a white surface? If you ask me, it looks like the other way around -- take a look:

    http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/images/raw/casJPGFullS33/N00092126.jpg

    Doesn't it look like the white is covering the black and slowly un-covering it due to craters forming?

    --
    It is by my will alone my thoughts acquire motion; it is by the juice of the coffee bean that the thoughts acquire speed
  15. Even if it's a boast by tkrotchko · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Even if it was a boast, Arthur C Clarke is allowed that little bit of ego. Besides being an engaging write, he was truly a SCIENCE fiction writer. I don't need to tell you all he's predicted, accomplished, and contributed to popular culture; you can do that yourself (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Clark).

    Truly an icon, and I glad he was around to see some sort of space exploration take place, even if we didn't accomplish everything he predicted.

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
    1. Re:Even if it's a boast by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      I agree. Clarke is one of the last of the great science fiction writers who got started in the Golden Age of SF from mid-20th century. If he doesn't want to boast, we can boast for him. The guy's done good in his career and we geeks are lucky to have him.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    2. Re:Even if it's a boast by kamapuaa · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      According to the Wikipedia article, the extent that he predicted was Geostationary orbits (although he wasn't the first to describe the idea, nor was he an influence on the actual development of the satellite), and the extent of his pop culture contributions was assisting Kubrick with 2001, and then later novelizing the movie.

      As a kid I liked the 2001 novel, I read some of his other works. Mostly they just described ridiculous nerd utopias without any real characters or character development, and constantly dove into his rants about his random list of pet peeves. The quite frequent racism was grating. Basically the guy is a crazy old coot who nobody would remember except that he was associated with Kubrick's out-dated blockbuster.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    3. Re:Even if it's a boast by pclminion · · Score: 3, Informative

      He's not just a fiction writer. I guess it's easy to forget that the man invented the communications satellite.

    4. Re:Even if it's a boast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No he didn't he just takes credit for it. Did you read the Wikipedia article he linked?

    5. Re:Even if it's a boast by pclminion · · Score: 1

      Yes, and it says nothing of the sort. It is simply unclear if he was truly the inspiration for the actual realization of comms satellites. It is indisputable that he published first.

  16. Odd... by argStyopa · · Score: 2, Funny

    Doesn't anyone find it funny that Cassini was *allegedly* hit by a cosmic ray event that tripped it into safe mode JUST as it was sliding around Iapetus?

    The last time this happened was 4 years ago.

    Coincidence? Ask Beagle! /tinfoil hat

    --
    -Styopa
  17. Ridge Flyover GIF(shameless selflink) by brownpau · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I tried making an animated GIF of the equatorial ridge flyover photos just to get a sense of Cassini's motion as it flew by Iapetus. A bit jumpy, but wow.

    1. Re:Ridge Flyover GIF(shameless selflink) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's pretty sweet. Thanks for sharing.

      May I recommend that you submit your animation to the Astronomy Picture of the Day site? No guarantee it will be accepted, but I think in a higher resolution it would be worthy of posting. I'd slow it down a bit first and try to adjust the timing of the frames so they replicate the actual motion of Cassini better.

      About APOD submissions
      APOD

    2. Re:Ridge Flyover GIF(shameless selflink) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow! nice work!

    3. Re:Ridge Flyover GIF(shameless selflink) by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      It reminds me of the opening credit sequence of the last series of Blake's 7.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    4. Re:Ridge Flyover GIF(shameless selflink) by shadowbearer · · Score: 1


        Beautiful, thanks. That's amazing. It looks like the moon was split in half and then somewhat gently crunched back together, not quite evenly. There's a couple of mid-size craters I can see (from this and other photos, and a lot of smaller ones) that overlay the fault, and it's covered with ejecta debris in some places, but the event still has to be relatively young, maybe a billion years or so. Did the moon came very close to the Roche limit of Saturn at one time when it wasn't quite solid? Weird terrain, reminds me of the Sierra Nevadas. That big mountain has to be a volcano - Iapetus still molten inside at the time?

        There should be more images of the ridge coming as the data gets downloaded, right? Iapetus deserves a probe of it's own, even just one with some good cameras.

        Back to the rawpix...

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  18. Still enigmatic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    i'm at a loss to explain those inky black patches.

    As am I. We can image Iapetus down to 36' of resolution and still not understand what we are seeing! The image with the sparse dark patches is the most amazing. If you look you can see clear embayment relationships. The black stuff seems to fill low lying areas like a liquid. It reminds me a little of the lake bed terrain near the Huygens lander on Titan and also the radar images of the lake terrain. There are even islands of light material poking up through the black in some craters in the 92001 image. But the light/black transition lines do not seem to match the topography perfectly like a liquid would in all areas. Incredibly, the craters in the lower center of the image seem to small black patches "emptying into" larger ones though narrow channels. Iapetus almost certainly never had a significant atmosphere. Perhaps there was a methane rich wet layer below the regolith that was exposed, seeped into low areas and darkened. The analogy is an aquifer on the Earth. Methifer may be the best term. To make the idea work a mechanism would have to be found to ablate light material on the leading hemisphere to expose the dark stuff. Recall the recent resultthat explains Iapetus' bizarre equatorial mountains. A heated, oblate Iapetus was rapidly quick frozen, creating membrane stresses that forced up the mountains at the equator. Perhaps the frozen layer was thin, and methane rich liquid persisted beneath it for long enough for the dark crater floors to form.

  19. cassini views moon as it flies by Uranus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wipes out klingons

  20. Re:APOD submit by brownpau · · Score: 1

    Ooooh nice idea, thanks. I sent the GIF over to them, and I'm working on a higher-res PSD now.

  21. Iapetus vs Japetus by Nick+Driver · · Score: 1

    I read the original 1968 book way back when I was in grade school somewhere around 1977 or 78, long before I ever saw the movie, so I always thought that Japetus was the correct name. I also thought the booked rocked, and when I finally did see the movie much later when I was in high school, I thought the movie was so confusing that it stunk, and thus have never cared much for the movie.

  22. Iapetus predicticus by celerityfm · · Score: 1

    I recall reading this in a relatively recent edition of 2001- very cool stuff: (from wikipedia) - In Arthur C. Clarke's novel 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968), astronaut Dave Bowman finds an enigmatic alien monolith waiting for him on the surface of Iapetus. Iapetus' two tone coloration is caused by a vast white ellipse on the moon's surface, with the monolith appearing as a black dot in its exact center. When the Voyager space probes arrived at Iapetus thirteen years later, they discovered that there was indeed a black region within the moon's brighter hemisphere. Clarke reports that Carl Sagan, who was on the Voyager imaging team, sent him a photo, with the note "Thinking of you ...". Because of difficulties achieving a convincing model of Saturn's rings, the film version of 2001: A Space Odyssey relocated the monolith to an orbit around Jupiter.

    --
    ...unfortunately no one can be told what The Mat^H^H^HGoatse is...they must experience it for themselves...
  23. more shamelessness by sootman · · Score: 1

    Nice job on the GIF. I'm not usually one to toot my own horn, but this is also a perfect application of the thing I mention in my .sig. Basically, I use PHP to generate some repetitive javascript which, when combined with an image map, creates a neat effect. Source code and examples are here, and here is this technology applied to the Iapetus pics.

    I'm too late to get modded up, so tell your friends! :-)

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  24. Shameless selflink, one more time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Without any shame at all at I'm proud to announce the flyby video I compiled using Cassini's raw images. Shame on me:)