Slashdot Mirror


FBI Boosts Servers For Faster Criminal Searches

coondoggie writes "The Federal Bureau of Investigation's Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) Division has awarded Lockheed Martin a $16 million contract to upgrade its central repository for criminal justice information services. 'The CJIS division operates national-level crime data systems that furnish name checks, fingerprints, criminal history data and other information to law enforcement officials. Keeping its systems on the leading edge should help CJIS with its goal of delivering getting timely and relevant criminal justice information to the FBI and all others in the law enforcement community. The new and upgraded servers will be part of the FBI's Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System.'"

90 comments

  1. 16 million here, 100 million there... by absoluteflatness · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well, the FBI wasted over $100 million on the Virtual Case File project, so I'm okay to let them play around with a mere $16 million however they want.

    In seriousness, speeding the results of criminal checks is a useful goal. Now all we need to do is make sure that the databases are filled with the correct information, and we'll be all set.

    1. Re:16 million here, 100 million there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have already wasted the money.
      That's why they are boosting servers.
      Somebody should report them to the police.

    2. Re:16 million here, 100 million there... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2, Funny
      Somebody should report them to the police.

      The police just had their servers boosted by the FBI, and are therefore running round in confusion.

    3. Re:16 million here, 100 million there... by akasch · · Score: 1

      I agree - good for them - they have as much right as we do to do whatever they want, the internet is free - and that includes them

      --
      Mo
    4. Re:16 million here, 100 million there... by it072312 · · Score: 1

      yay...finally osama can be caught

    5. Re:16 million here, 100 million there... by thegnu · · Score: 1

      The FBI seems pretty goddamn cheap for the kind of work they do. Considering how much we spend on the Pentagon and the prison system. And the Senate, which doesn't seem to be doing us much good, anyway.

      Plus, who doesn't love those MIB suits? And their stylish, matching pistols?

      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
  2. News? by moehoward · · Score: 4, Insightful


    Is a lousy $16 million contract news? Give me a break. Most big companies sneeze $16 million in IT expenses every day.

    Cut the political and "big-brother-gonna-get-ya" crap, editors. This is a complete non-story. They are upgrading. Gosh. Nobody ever does that. And how many Slashdot stories ridiculed the FBI for spending billions on their failed IT re-alignment?

    Stop the Boogey-Man stories and let's talk Nerd.

    Moe

    --
    "If you want to improve, be content to be thought foolish and stupid." - Epictetus
    1. Re:News? by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 2

      Most big companies sneeze $16 million in IT expenses every day. Cut the political and "big-brother-gonna-get-ya" crap, editors. This is a complete non-story. Excuse me Moe, but what the fuck are you talking about? What "political crap"? I've read the summary twice (just the summary, mind, I can't be bothered to actually read the article), and I didn't see any sort of political content at all.

      And just out of curiosity, how many million $ do you think it should take for a story like this to make the front page?
    2. Re:News? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      You are absolutely correct but I also agree with the GP.

      The "political crap" is directly under the summary, ie: in the tags and replies.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    3. Re:News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give me a break. Most big companies sneeze $16 million in IT expenses every day.

      Are you kidding? My company made 13 Billion dollars last year and I can't even convince them to put a gig of RAM in a computer. Shit, we still have Win98 computers floating around, "Because they still work."

  3. Lockheed Martin? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not the people I normally associate with this type of application. Makes me wonder if they will deliver a flight control system adapted to work as a criminal justice information service.

    But then, perhaps they are more diverse than I thought.

    1. Re:Lockheed Martin? by bombastinator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nope. Not really.

      Furthermore they specialize in hand building purposed hardware. This is not at all what the FBI needs.

      If they said sun took the contract I wouldn't be surprised, but Lockheed? I suspect their getting this contract had more to do with their experience with acquiring government contracts than it does with them actually being the right people for the job.

    2. Re:Lockheed Martin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are experienced in it.
      Lockheed recently deployed a part of the FBI's Sentinel program. (Effectively a mechanism to allow agents make use of FBI information without having to have the skills to program a mainframe). This was a program that they wasted quite a bit of money on before lockheed deployed a solution for them (I believe the contractor previously was SAIC).

      They're well known for making space/air/defense based technology, but that have an entire business Unit devoted to these types of projects.

      When it comes down to it, nearly all defense contractors do.

    3. Re:Lockheed Martin? by verucabong · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually Lockheed Martin has a new, growing, IT support services division called Global Services and Information Services. In 2006, it made up 12% of its revenue and is one of its quickly growing segments. With government agencies looking to cut costs, sometimes it's cheaper to outsource their IT to an outside company. The hitch is that they need to be able to trust the company with some of the nation's most important data. That's where Lockheed Martin comes it - they've been a defense contractor for just about forever, so they have a reputation for trustworthiness and are vastly experienced in navigating governmental regulations, security clearances etc etc... It's a good thing.

    4. Re:Lockheed Martin? by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      Well, since the airplane market is shrinking and has very low margins, spreading their income is probably a good idea as well. And when can we buy servers from them? Of course it will be overpriced and all, but really, who doesn't want a server with a 'lockheed martin' logo :)

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    5. Re:Lockheed Martin? by verucabong · · Score: 0

      Not really sure if the "overpriced and all" holds... at the classified facility that I work at (for Lockheed Martin) half the reason Lockheed was chosen was because they were lower than other bidders. I don't think they were the lowest, but a proven track record is something that people don't mind paying for. (The whole "get what you pay for" mentality)

    6. Re:Lockheed Martin? by CoonAss56 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I work for the Army Corps of Engineers in NOLA and Lockheed just got a contract for the entire Corps IT system. The government IT people can't even get Lockheed to talk to them on an on-going basis. I think they are more interested in sub-contracting most if not all of the work to other people and just collecting the money as the prime contractor and not getting their hands dirty with the real work. They are proposing a seat-management type of system but have done no planning for such a complete reversal of what we have now. As a result, I feel within a year they will get booted and we will have to undergo another contracting out of our IT services.
      If anyone wants to see how well they have done at other govt projects, cast an eye to some Coast Guard ships that they lengthened and now are so un-seaworthy that they can't be moved from their berths. All the while Lockheed got paid and are not returning any money to the taxpayers for this debacle.

      --
      Won't Bow.....Don't Know How
    7. Re:Lockheed Martin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually Lockheed Martin is very diverse. I'm a Lockheed Martin engineer and I'm part of the team that built the FBI's AFIS. We delivered it to the FBI in 1999. We have a large group of engineers working in biometrics. We built the first system and we did the hardware upgrade in 2003 (both very successfully). There is no reason for them not to hire us for this round of upgrades.

  4. Pimp my jail ride by skoaldipper · · Score: 1

    by providing HP Uplift Kits for 15 Superdome servers and 1 Flatsdome server.
    Sweet. I'd love to see a CRAY riding on just two.
    --
    I hope, when they die, cartoon characters have to answer for their sins.
  5. fingerprints by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if they will have my fingerprints from the DARE program in 6th grade on the system...?

    1. Re:fingerprints by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      I wonder if they will have my fingerprints from the DARE program in 6th grade on the system...?

      I think those have to be destroyed by local authorities at age 18 and only kept locally (at least per most states' minor privacy laws).

      -b.

  6. Not a bad thing ... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not everyone can access FBI records directly, so this won't increase non-governmental background checks (which typically use data collected by private sources). But it WILL cause innocent people being held under suspicion of being a fugitive to be released faster. The data is being accessed anyway -- may as well do it quickly to minimally inconvenience those who shouldn't be inconvenienced.

    1. Re:Not a bad thing ... by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Do people get released because of clean background checks? Truly?

      And what do you bet that having a background check done won't lower your FBI "credit rating", and make the agents go "Hah, this guy has been background checked twice before -- where there's smoke, there's fire!"?

      Besides, background checks is based on the view that people are inherently evil or good, and that someone's past can be reliably used to predict the future. This is complete bullshit, of course, but self-propagating bullshit. In countries where records are truly stricken so people can get jobs afterwards and have other venues than resorting to crime again, repeat offenses are very much lower. But even in the US, the majority of severe crimes are done by people without records. The solution isn't to expand the records until they include everyone.

    2. Re:Not a bad thing ... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      Do people get released because of clean background checks? Truly?

      Well, if you happen to look like a certain felon, and your fingerprints don't match those at any of the crime scenes ... You'd want to be exonerated as quickly as possible, no?

      -b.

    3. Re:Not a bad thing ... by arth1 · · Score: 1

      You'd want to be exonerated as quickly as possible, no?


      No, I much prefer not to be apprehended in the first place, and that the feds arrest more perpetrators and fewer suspects.

      Regards,
      --
      *Art
    4. Re:Not a bad thing ... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      No, I much prefer not to be apprehended in the first place, and that the feds arrest more perpetrators and fewer suspects.

      Mistakes happen -- not all incorrect arrests are malicious. It would be good if mistakes are able to be cleared as early as possible. Remember, being arrested and charged doesn't presuppose guilt.

      -b.

    5. Re:Not a bad thing ... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But even in the US, the majority of severe crimes are done by people without records. The solution isn't to expand the records until they include everyone. AFIS, at least, isn't about expanding at all. As far as I know, there hasn't been a significant expansion of finger-print collecting practices other than the aliens-entering-the-us BS, which in terms of raw numbers, hasn't been that big of a deal.

      This contract announcement is really a non-event. This AFIS system has been running for 10 years now and has had one round of hardware upgrades in that time. This is the second round because, in part, the hardware they are running on is going to move off HP's support list in another year or two.

      The new hardware is both cheaper and faster than the old hardware so they get a performance boost out of it too. Really nothing to see here unless you are HP, Lockmart or one of their subcontractors who get a piece of this pie.
      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    6. Re:Not a bad thing ... by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      "Do people get released because of clean background checks? Truly?"

      Yes, you may look like Charles Manson but if you have the fingerprints of someone else you are free to go.

      "Besides, background checks is based on the view that people are inherently evil or good"

      No, it's based on the fact the authorities "do not know you from Adam" and the observation that ordinary people who actually do "have something to hide" become expert liars when dealing with the authorities.

      Part of "the solution" is: STOP locking up so many people for trivial offences.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  7. Automated Fingerprint Identification System? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The new and upgraded servers will be part of the FBI's Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System.

    Does anyone else smell a bullshit cover story or is it just me? This big fuss over what, 470 million fingerprints? I could fit that on my laptop.

    1. Re:Automated Fingerprint Identification System? by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

      Does anyone else smell a bullshit cover story or is it just me? This big fuss over what, 470 million fingerprints? I could fit that on my laptop.

      You can't fit 470 million fingerprints on an HD platter. There isn't enough clearance and the drive head plows into the fingerprint oil.

    2. Re:Automated Fingerprint Identification System? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Funny

      You can't fit 470 million fingerprints on an HD platter

      Clearly you don't rent DVD's from the same video library as me.

    3. Re:Automated Fingerprint Identification System? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      clearly that joke went right over your head, and it was so obvious.

  8. Why duplicate efforts? by Gunfighter · · Score: 1

    The NSA already has all of this information stored and indexed anyways. Why not just partner up with them? Shouldn't be too hard to integrate since the NSA will already have their hands in the FBI network to police it (according to http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/09/22/0340219).

    (it's funny... laugh)

    --
    -- Stu

    /. ID under 2,000. I feel old now.
  9. Chump change by MeditationSensation · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They got nothin' on the NSA: "NSA's budget for electricity exceeds US$31 million per year, making it the second largest electricity consumer in the entire state of Maryland."

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nsa

    1. Re:Chump change by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      They got nothin' on the NSA: "NSA's budget for electricity exceeds US$31 million per year, making it the second largest electricity consumer in the entire state of Maryland."
      (emphasis mine)

      Why did I just Guybrush Threepwood's voice in my head just then?
      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    2. Re:Chump change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If the NSA is number two who the hell is number one?

  10. If you're thinking of doing business with the FBI by jcr · · Score: 1

    Google for "inslaw".

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  11. boost = 'steal' by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

    FBI Boosts Servers

    anyone else see the word 'boost' as 'steal' ?

    maybe a better subject line could have been chosen.

    (or, well, maybe you did mean that?)

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    1. Re:boost = 'steal' by deftcoder · · Score: 1

      Yes, it immediately made me think of what happened to ThePirateBay.

      --
      Peace sells, but who's buying?
    2. Re:boost = 'steal' by kent_eh · · Score: 1

      anyone else see the word 'boost' as 'steal' ?

      Nope.

      'round here the most common use of the word boost is in reference to jump starting a car, as in:

      "Hey, can ya give me a boost, my battery is dead"

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
  12. Re:Damn straight! by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 3, Informative
    I'm tired of all this phoney-baloney liberal crap. The FBI are here for our own good. Only those with something to hide pay them any attention.

    Yes, they've been involved in some Constitutionally sketchy stuff. But a lot of their work *IS* really catching ordinary criminals. Not even terrorists or keeping files on "political" people. People who break into houses, rob and kill; serial killers; escaped prisoners, etc.

    -b.

  13. Re:law enforcement by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Want to know where your freedom has gone, America? Overzealous prosecutors with political aspirations and gung-ho macho cops.

    And the solution is very simple: abolish plea bargaining and require a speedy jury trial on anything that anyone is charged with. If the State actually has to try all charges, the practice of charging people guilty of minor offenses with everything on the books that MIGHT stick will stop very rapidly.

  14. Currency?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he Federal Bureau of Investigation's Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) Division has awarded Lockheed Martin a $16 million contract to upgrade its central repository for criminal justice information services


    Are they talking about USD or CDN?
    1. Re:Currency?? by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 1

      Are they talking about USD or CDN? Zimbabwe dollars.
    2. Re:Currency?? by darkonc · · Score: 1

      Are they talking about USD or CDN? Yes.
      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  15. Hide them in plain site by WindowlessView · · Score: 1

    (CJIS) Division today awarded Lockheed Martin a $16 million contract to upgrade its Hewlett Packard Superdome Unix servers.

    That ensures that FEMA will never find them w/o help from Anderson Cooper.

    --
    Leave the gun, take the cannolis.
  16. Re:law enforcement by schwit1 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Won't work if the DA is responsible for prosecuting cops. If a DA prosecutes cops no differently than non-cops he will see his cases get screwed up or seriously backlogged because the cops do the investigations.


    Government officials should be investigated, charged and prosecuted by a separate disinterested party that can not be threatened or influenced by government officials.


    The failure by Fairfax County Virginia DA Robert Horan is a prime example. He recently refused to charge 2 cops that killed unarmed non-violent citizens. In these instances if the rolls had been reversed and cops were killed in the same manner he would have gone for the death penalty or life without parole.

  17. Re:Damn straight! by WindowlessView · · Score: 4, Funny

    Only those with something to hide pay them any attention.

    Said like only an Anonymous Coward could!

    --
    Leave the gun, take the cannolis.
  18. Try over $500M in total by MikeRT · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Source. The FBI is an agency that desperately needs to have a president come in and clean house, firing managers, devolving authority back to field agents and other measures that would help to clean out the bureaucratic nightmare.

    1. Re:Try over $500M in total by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The FBI is an agency that desperately needs to have a president come in and clean house

      I don't know why this guy got modded Troll ... what he's saying is largely correct (I know some FBI types who would agree with him), although realistically you can apply that principle to virtually any major Federal agency.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:Try over $500M in total by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about if you got a President who likes to appoint incompetent and corrupt sycophants and cronies instead -- how would that be?

    3. Re:Try over $500M in total by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like Ronald "PATCO" Reagan?

  19. the FBI's image by v1 · · Score: 1

    When someone discusses the local police department personnel, I think of people trying to protect me and fight crime. When they upgraded their radio system to communicate better I considered that a good thing.

    But when I think of the FBI, I don't see them that way. I see an orgnization that appears to be a threat to my privacy and basic rights and fredoms. I don't think this is how it should be, but there it is. So things like this just worry me more.

    I don't see the FBI getting better at what they do as being a good thing for me. Anyone else feel this way?

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:the FBI's image by budword · · Score: 1

      I haven't meet any local cops trying to fight crime. They wait until a crime has been commited and then they show up and do paperwork. In between paperwork they try hard to prop up their egos. That, I have seen plenty of. Local cops in larger cities have police work to do. In smaller towns, they try hard to find something to do. THOSE cops are a larger threat to your wellbeing than the FBI.

    2. Re:the FBI's image by meburke · · Score: 1

      Interesting viewpoint. We may lack some hard statistics that would clarify the actual effectiveness and integrity of the FBI. I worked as a bail bondsman for a while in Houston. I would MUCH prefer to be investigated by the Feds than the locals. Houston is not as close to being a police state as it was 10 years ago, but that may be due to problems recruiting and keeping good cops, and they are undermanned. On the other hand, the Feds will investigate local police corruption or police abuse of authority in a heartbeat, and they can't generally be swayed from their investigations.

      On the other hand there are the political investigations. The Oscar Wyatt case is a good example of something that is likely to be confused for years because the pressures are politically charged. (Wyatt is mostly Democrat, but contributes on both sides of the gate.) Now we have a case that is complicated and the public will never get to to see the complete relevant issues. The trial is very lengthy, the transactions are complex, and the justification for the transactions are tied to so many possible extenuating circumstances that people are likely to have a brain meltdown trying to decide whats a relevant fact and what's a judgment call. Needless to say, it is highly likely that the investigators are sucking up to the people who write their paychecks, but without proof we can't know for sure.

      --
      "The mind works quicker than you think!"
    3. Re:the FBI's image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's just part of city life. When I was little I knew the police by name, they went to my church, their wives backed me cookies. I genuinely believed that the police were my friends and that they were there to protect me.

      Then I moved to a big city and learned that the police are there to harass you, the police are there to intimidate you, the police are there to feel big by making you feel small.

      Maybe the quality of people who become cops in big cities is worse than those in small towns, or maybe being a cop in a big city makes you a crazy asshole. My money is on the second option. And on the feds being the craziest assholes of all.

    4. Re:the FBI's image by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      The FBI has a pretty good image in my part of the country. It's main activity here seems to be rooting out corruption at a municipal and state level. Almost every day there is a headline detailing a bribery sting operation that caught some local politician trying to make money on the side accepting money to fix contracts or grease the wheels for some no-bid purchase.

      Compared to local police I think I trust them more, not less.

  20. Just narrow the search to DC by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    "The killer's calling you from inside the (white) house!"

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  21. MODS. by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

    I agree the GP has the wrong end of the stick but his post is factual (see my reply to it above), and contains no ad-homs that I can see. Modding it flaimbait just adds to the "political crap".

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  22. Re:law enforcement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plea bargaining is a good thing. It allows us to convict criminals more readily whether they be senators who solicit sex in bathrooms or football players who kill dogs.

    I agree about the speedy trial, however, when charing people with multiple counts usually a single trial is done. So they *do* charge them with everything. Habeas corpus and due process are not impeded by this.

  23. Is this Rev4 or Rev5 of CJIS many millions ... by OldHawk777 · · Score: 1

    FBI management (I think) is now on Rev5 in 7 years or less,
    FBI management as good as most (thank god not all) management
    in most governments.

    National Whitehouse to local doghouse DemRep... management
    can spend money and make stupid and irresponsible decisions.
    Elected or appointed the bosses are vindictive losers and
    petty fools. The pack-mules and worker-bees in the field
    and cubical are the sources of all performance and success
    from which the show-dogs take credit.

    I remember reading about many different big multi$M contracts
    over many decades that suffered extremely expensive questionable
    success, and senior management types were awarded financially
    for amazing spin-facts and plausible-truths, then were promoted
    for being management successes.

    We ain't got a meritocracy in the USA, and plutocrat spin-democracy
    supports corporatist-welfare, while ignoring public welfare, and
    generating a failing economy and destroying national security.

    I am old enough, I don't worry about it much, I'll be dead by a decade
    before the implosion of the Corporate States of America (CSA) where
    there will be complete national public equality as serfs for the CSA.

    --
    Unaccountable leaders are masters, and unrepresented people are slaves. How do US and EU fare?
  24. Boosted by weinrich · · Score: 1

    And here, for all these years, we here at /. always claimed those stupid "Turbo" buttons on the front of our PC's were meaningless. Leave it to the FBI to prove us all wrong!

    --
    Error: .sig not found, using /etc/passwd instead
  25. I thought Lockheed Martin builds weapon systems? by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

    I know they do, I know someone who works for them.

    Since when do they do IT?

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
  26. Doh! - Broken link. by TapeCutter · · Score: 1
    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  27. Re:law enforcement by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2, Insightful
    It allows us to convict criminals more readily whether they be senators who solicit sex in bathrooms or football players who kill dogs.

    You don't WANT criminal conviction to be easy. And plea bargaining has another unintended effect: it causes people to plead guilty to stuff that they didn't do. Let's say if you were falsely arrested for murder, and didn't have money for an attorney other than a public defender. "You can either cop to manslaughter and get 10 years, or we try you for murder and there's a chance you'll fry." Which choice would you take? Sure? Even if you weren't too educated and considered yourself powerless against the State? Plea bargaining is often used as a way to bully people into pleading guilty for something, and therefore the prosecutors can be seen to be closing cases, even if the wrong person is convicted.

    Also, plea bargaining, as I said before, encourages higher (and generally unfair) initial charges. If DAs knew that the higher charges would go to trial and generally not stick, they'd be less likely to levy them. Remember, even if a felony charge gets dropped, it can stay on your record as an arrest.

    I may add that juries should be allowed three verdicts: guilty, not guilty, and malicious prosecution -- under which a higher court would have the option of investigating the conduct of the arrest and trial.

    -b.

  28. Lookup versus search by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is a difference between a lookup database and an open-ended search database. It is relatively easy to save and retrieve data based on an individual using say a social security number or drivers license. However, it is a much bigger problem to do things such as list all crime cases where a thief with a green dragon tattoo drove off in a white Chevy Impala.

    The first can use regular indexes, while the second requires high-end hardware and probably mass sequential searches for nation-wide searches. Plus, that information may be in different formats in different areas.

  29. Re:Damn straight! by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

    I'm tired of all this phoney-baloney liberal crap.
    You too, huh? :/

    (sarcasm noted BTW)
    --
    You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
  30. I guess Google Wouldn't Take the Contract by darkonc · · Score: 1

    "Do no evil", and all that ...

    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  31. faster? by syedelyas · · Score: 1

    if this thing going to make the world is safe enough because the damn grading technologies? how they gonna be if in the reality they cant catch a thief, how this thing going to happen

  32. Probably Java's Fault by magma · · Score: 3, Informative
    I have heard the FBI presentations where they talk about using libXML + C to handle data on the network but in most states IT departments are moving to Java + XML for messaging (even if the fingerprints arn't XML the bulk of the data on the network now is). This is not just a 5x hit on speed because Java is "kind of interpreted" or "not really compiled" but more like a 20x or more hit because XML is just so verbose, it eats 20x or more bandwidth AND Java is slow at processing it compared to the messaging it replaced. The smallest possible tag set is

    <a>A</a>
    , that's 8 chars compared to the 1 char it used to be.

    Everywhere the police complain about the speed and most likely blame the FBI. Too bad they can't see the slow software running in their own state IT departments. Speed and storage (3 years of transactions need to be on file and searchable) are what are suffering now - even if the FBI did all libXML + C for everything they still have a bunch of Java clients connecting and taking their sweet old time downloading data.
    1. Re:Probably Java's Fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know you are a troll but ill bite,
      check you facts about language-speeds
      instead of trying to keeping old myth about "java's slow" alive.

      http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/

    2. Re:Probably Java's Fault by magma · · Score: 1

      Umm, The Great Language Shootout is a game. If you are going to hold that out in defense then you have to admit that FreePascal is better, faster and, uses less memory or that FreeBasic is just as portable as Java with better speed, easier syntax, and can use many C XML parsers as well as GTK , etc. You could never advocate Pascal or Basic even if I show them as better using your own ruler!

      I am only a troll to you because I spoke out against the Java-religion.

      I offer this to you in rebuttal: Aesop's Fable about the Fox who loses his tail in a trap.
      I hardly think that you would defend the Java language with such voracity if you had half a chance of learning another. This would leave you not basking, but instead trapped, in Java.

      I guess that makes you the troll.

      BTW: Java is slow!

  33. Not as impressive as 16 million, but sneezed... by Tatarize · · Score: 1

    My friends cat sneezed 400 dollars in IT the other day. He just put the sucker together, booted it up, cat looked over the edge, sneezed... and the spark was fantastic. Managed to kill the Mobo and the CPU.

    --

    It is no longer uncommon to be uncommon.
  34. You want more secutiy for your servers? by kitsunewarlock · · Score: 1

    5 words: Take them off the net.

    Do not allow these servers to be in contact with any computers on the net. Install updates and software manually. Withdraw information via hardcopies (portable harddrives, flashdrives, etc...) if you need them on computers also connected to the tubes. In the meantime, get your important data off the web.

    --
    Ginga no Rekshiya Mata Each page.
    1. Re:You want more secutiy for your servers? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      get your important data off the web.

      Never happen. The Internet is just too damned convenient, not to mention cheap. The fact that everything you send over it is vulnerable to one degree or another doesn't seem to matter to some people.

      From a security perspective, they'd be better off on dial-up.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  35. Upgrades by Wowsers · · Score: 1

    After the government has turned the entire USA population and all tourists into virtual suspects, it now needs more computing power to churn through all the garbage data it's producing.

    Government and good IT spending just doesn't happen.

    --
    Take Nobody's Word For It.
  36. Re:Probably XML's Fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are a Troll.
    Yet, you start with "probably Java" and finish with "it is XML".
    Don't forget that they could always use a C XML parser in Java.
    See System.load().

  37. If you're thinking of doing business with the KFC by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

    Google for "coleslaw".

    (Sorry,couldn't resist. I lived next to one for three years)

    --
    molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
  38. From TFA: by pdcull · · Score: 1

    Not expected to be complete until 2001, The FBI says Sentinel will deliver an electronic information management system...

  39. Re:I thought Lockheed Martin builds weapon systems by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    You don't think information's a weapon?

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  40. Seems counter productive by Hydian · · Score: 1

    Why would they want criminals to be able to search their servers faster?

  41. Re:I thought Lockheed Martin builds weapon systems by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

    information is never a weapon. How they use it makes it a weapon

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
  42. Watch out... by AmishElvis · · Score: 1

    You don't think the Government is evil? Well one night, when you're asleep, the government is gonna get ya. They're gonna get ya!

  43. Interesting by kilodelta · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From 2001 to 2003 I worked for the Rhode Island Department of Attorney General as the Director of I.T.

    At that time there were two things going on. First was the box that sat in the back of the computer room with all sorts of encryption hardware and it's own frame-relay connection. This was to allow us to connect to the CJIS network. The second part was the Interstate Identification Index.

    In the past the FBI used to hold all fingerprint records. What they did with the advent of Automated Fingerprinted Identification Systems (AFIS) is push the burden onto the states. Rhode Island uses Connecticuts AFIS. But the criminal history dips hit that CJIS network to see if an active record in any state exists and then returns the information. This is also based on positive matches on a ten-print scan.

    But here is where it gets interesting. The criminal history database was housed on an IBM RS/6000 under Oracle. To get our III data to the FBI we had to do an export. Well, the tapes and tape drives we had were of the Metal-Oxide variety and the FBI couldn't read the tapes. We ended up burning a set of 6 CD's with all the data they'd requested.

    But we've long been told of the charlie-foxtrot that FBI and IRS systems became, but I've worked with many CJIS folks and they were competent people.

  44. Re:Damn straight! by aminorex · · Score: 1

    Nonsense. None of those are federal crimes.

    --
    -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  45. Re:Probably XML's Fault by magma · · Score: 1

    "Don't forget that they could always use a C XML parser in Java." Right, they all do that.

    I can only say what I hear. "How come this stuff is slower than Cobol on a mainframe?" Part of the reason is XML but those that use XML with C do not have the same degradation of performance. Those that use Java are struggling.

    You don't have to believe it if you don't want to. Yet there it is like a fisherman holding an extinct fish... like that would ever happen.