Slashdot Mirror


Game Pirate Sentenced To Jail Time

A man charged in a case separate from the much-publicized anti-modder raids last month has been sentenced to ninety days in prison, another nine months of work furlough, and five years of probation. "Police seized over 1,000 pirated game discs during the raid on Brown's home, along with 'numerous' mod chips. Ric Hirsch, Vice-President of Intellectual Property Enforcement at the ESA, said, 'Sentences that include jail time send a clear message that violating intellectual property rights is a serious crime with significant consequences and violators will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.'"

33 of 136 comments (clear)

  1. THANK GOODNESS! by glindsey · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hope they cleared a few of those pesky rapists and murderers out of the prisons to make room for the awful, awful crime of INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY THEFT!

    1. Re:THANK GOODNESS! by Applekid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm sure he'll get put in white-collar prison and not get mixed in with the gangbanging general population. He won't be taking the place of some murderer, but I do get your point about law enforcement and correction institutions' resources probably better served going after crimes with non-corporate victims.

      That said, I sort of wished they threw more of the book at this guy for pirating this stuff. Mod chips have a legitimate use by enabling the owner of hardware to use it in the way they see fit. The homebrew community and those who enjoy the protection that backups provide should hold a zero-tolerance policy to those who would use those tools to enjoy materials for which they didn't pay.

      My guess is that if the homebrew/backup communities weren't all driven underground thanks to the DMCA and corps with large legal budgets, they'd agree.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    2. Re:THANK GOODNESS! by Loconut1389 · · Score: 2, Informative

      IMHO white collar crime should result in fines and possibly house arrest. Real crimes should land you in real prison. I think with as good as home arrest tracking devices are, they could let a lot of the lesser crimes folks out of jail and put them on house arrest with some other kind of punishment since house arrest, while totally a nuisance (on purpose of course) and wearing the bracelet makes sex less fun and all that, it still isn't the same kind of punishment.

    3. Re:THANK GOODNESS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      . . .wearing the bracelet makes sex less fun and all that. . .

      I happen to like handcuffs, thank you very much!

    4. Re:THANK GOODNESS! by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 2, Funny

      This reminds me of a joke (now in my journal).

      There were three guys in prison... two muscular, bearded and looking really badass.

      One of the ruffians asks the other: "So, what did you get prison for?"
      "I killed 10 people - cut their arms and legs with a pocket knife, just for the fun of it. You?"
      The other guy answers: "I caught my wife with another man. Burned the hell outta' them".

      Then they stare at the third guy - a wimpy kid with glasses sitting in a corner. "Hey kid, what ya here for?"

      The kid answers in a depressed tone: "I pirated stuff from the internet".
      The two ruffians gasp, back off and start sweating.

    5. Re:THANK GOODNESS! by BosstonesOwn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Im going to kill my use of my mod points. Here goes.

      This whole digital copying thing is a really horrible precedent to set in this country.

      I really want to know why they equate digital copying to theft , we pay for data bits and the electricity to get and send them as well as paying for the service to transport it. This completely ticks me off.

      If the person was selling "back ups" then I am all for having them arrested and they should be sitting in their home with out a internet connection or computer. I see nothing wrong with selling and installing mod chips.

      While IP issues should be resolved in a civil case , they should not be wasting resources on this. Yet another waste of resources.

      --
      This package Does Not Contain a Winner
    6. Re:THANK GOODNESS! by eln · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think it should be dependent on the severity of the crime. A CEO who commits massive fraud that results in the loss of thousands of jobs has committed a serious crime and has adversely affected the lives of thousands of people. Should he really be allowed to serve his time under "house arrest" in his opulent mansion? How is that justice?

      I'm not saying that these types of crimes are best punished by putting these people in with violent criminals, but they should definitely serve time in a real prison. Separate the violent criminals from the non-violent criminals for safety's sake, but other than that the accommodations should be similar across the board.

  2. Whew by Selfbain · · Score: 5, Funny

    I feel safer now. Nothing scares me more than the thought of walking down the street and having my IP stolen at gunpoint.

    --
    Well, it has never been successfully tested.
    1. Re:Whew by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 2, Funny
      This was a game pirate! Forget having your IP stolen at gunpoint, this man would have sailed up to you, hit you with a couple of cannon broadsides, boarded your ship, then stolen your IP, (possibly at gunpoint -flintlock pistol- but more likely at cutlass- or hook-point,) drink your rum, and then force you to walk the plank.

      Please don't trivialize game piracy by mistakenly thinking it's just a matter of having your IP stolen.

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
    2. Re:Whew by vux984 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      that because you don't make a living from IP. for some people, their IP is their salary, their savings and their pension. Now imagine having that stolen from you. still don't care?

      I make a living from IP, and no I still don't care.

      The average brute who beats his wife and kids probably won't end up in jail for the first several incidents.

      Your average petty thug mugger who confronts people and takes their wallet and watch at knife or gunpoint rarely ends up in jail for more than a few hours, no matter how often they get caught. Despite the threat of violence, the theft of real property, and the substantial emotional distress they cause their victims.

      Your average retail convenience stores are shoplifted from on a daily basis. Real goods, that cost real money, being stolen for real. Every day. When the pricks get caught, how many of THEM end up in jail for more than a few hours? Practically none.

      So why should a guy who makes copies in a nonviolent way, that don't take anything real away from me, and potentially don't usually even mean a lost sale -- what exactly has he done that he should he go to jail when other criminals who do much worse things do not?

      Once we've got a policy of locking up all the brutes, thugs, drug dealers, thieves, and shoplifters then we can look at raising the penalty for crimes like jay-walking and copyright infringement.

      Now, of course, if this guy is at the commericial/industrial scale of infringement, complete with counterfeiting discs, and laundering the money made, then yeah, he's costing his victims and society enough to treated like a serious criminal and deserves jail time.

      But your average schmuck with an ftp server or some such nonsense ... give me a break. I'd rather be funding the police to track down bigger fish than that.

    3. Re:Whew by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you hold me at gunpoint, IP.

      --
    4. Re:Whew by rtb61 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I can provide a even better target for law enforcement, the treo that do by far the most harm to society, the treo that will take the most lives, the treo that will steal the most from consumers, the treo that will steal the most tax payer dollars, the treo who deservedly belong in prison more than anybody else due to the long term and severe harm of their actions. The corrupt corporate executive, the corrupt lobbyist, and the corrupt politician.

      There are thousands of them out there and working together the kill and harm millions, if effort was taken off every other crime and focused on them, with a sincere a genuine effort to prosecute all of them, the benefit to society would be immediately apparent, the savings in terms of not not only money but in lives saved and in the prevention of actual physical harm being caused to people would be enormous.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  3. Woo! by maihardu · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now they're going to stop intellectual property theft with the threat of jail time! Just like they did with murder, rape, breaking and entering, counterfeiting, and all of those other crimes! I feel safer already.

    1. Re:Woo! by onecheapgeek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Since prison isn't a deterrent to any crime, let's just stop throwing money there and close them down, right?

  4. The message I got out of this by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A ton of policemen who could've done something useful (like finding some people who do actually rob and steal, in the actual sense of the law) for society were kept busy to stick a guy in the can who doesn't affect me or 99% of the population in the slightest.

    And for what? 90 days of jail. Whoo boy. He must be a really tough criminal! I dunno about your country, but 90 days is about what you get when you drive with the subway and refuse to pay the fine. For the third time. After being tried and told that paying the fee of 60 bucks is PROBABLY more interesting for you.

    In other words, the damage this guy did must've been somewhere around 60 bucks. At least we now have found a reliable value for IP.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  5. Now for modding thought by Nos. · · Score: 5, Informative
    By the sounds of it:

    Brown was facing 10 counts of felony offenses, including grand theft, computer crime and trafficking in counterfeit products. In August, Brown pleaded guilty to two counts of counterfeit trafficking and today received a one-year sentence, the first 90 days to be spent in prison and the rest in work furlough. He was also given five years probation and a fine of $100,000, and will be required to pay $10,000 in restitution to the ESA.

    Which sounds to me like its for selling pirated copies of games. I don't see an issue here. Don't sell copies of games, and you've got a lot less (or maybe nothing at all) to worry about.
  6. The people in charge by Atrox666 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The people doing this don't give a rat's ass what your opinion is.
    The only way to make them stop is to insist with all force necessary.
    If you're not willing to get your hands dirty to stand up to this scum then no one HAS to care what you think..so why bother shaking your little fist and writing scathing condemnations?

    Cut word lines
    Cut music lines
    Smash the control images
    Smash the control machine.
      - William S. Burroughs

  7. No Shit. by cromar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I would love to see some RIAA high priests locked up (even for 90 days). Big media has truly done more to hurt us than any pirates.

  8. Clarification by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Brown was facing 10 counts of felony offenses, including grand theft, computer crime and trafficking in counterfeit products. In August, Brown pleaded guilty to two counts of counterfeit trafficking and today received a one-year sentence, the first 90 days to be spent in prison and the rest in work furlough.


    It's important to note that he was a "mod chip seller," not a normal Joe who downloads pirated games and then plays them on his modded consoles. The grand theft charge was dropped in the plea, of course.

    U.S. law makes copyright violation a crime -- for the distributor. It has yet to pass laws against the distributee. And won't, otherwise you could be prosecuted for buying a plagiarized book at the bookstore.
  9. Re:non violent criminals by This_Is_My_Happening · · Score: 3, Informative

    He didn't go to jail for owning mod chips, or having "over 1,000 pirated game discs" in his house. If you RTFA, you'll see he pleaded guilty to two counts of counterfeit trafficking. That's right, he was selling mod chips.

    No one ever goes to jail for just having pirated materials (regardless of the law against it in some countries). The only people who get in trouble are people selling/distributing it.

    --
    God made me an atheist. Who are you to question his wisdom?
  10. Re:non violent criminals by malkavian · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I get the sneaky suspicion that he wouldn't have been raided, and hauled up if he hadn't been selling the pirated games.
    Personally, I pay for all the games and stuff I have, but I'm indifferent to people using copies. Where I do draw the line is commercial infringement. I actively dislike the making of money from an infringement setup. For that, I think 90 days is fair. It's not throwing the book at him and making him out to be the root of all evil, and up there with the terrorists.. It's saying "You've been very naughty. Really, don't do it again, or else"..
    He really did wrong, and got caught. What were the cops to do, turn round and say "Never mind. Be a good boy. Off you go now!".

  11. Absurd! by RingDev · · Score: 4, Insightful

    violating intellectual property rights is a serious crime with significant consequences and violators will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Murder is a serious crime. Rape, assault, illegal weapons possession, robbery, car jacking, drunken driving,those are SERIOUS crimes. Intellectual property theft especially on the scale that this guy was doing, is a financial crime. You don't lock him up for 90 days, you assess him a huge ass fine and hold his house as collateral. WTF are we burdening an already overloaded prison system with crap like this. Yeah, the guy broke the law. Pay your fine, play nice, 5 years probation, story ends.

    -Rick
    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    1. Re:Absurd! by SplatMan_DK · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Murder is a serious crime. Rape, assault, illegal weapons possession, robbery, car jacking, drunken driving,those are SERIOUS crimes. Intellectual property theft especially on the scale that this guy was doing, is a financial crime. Actually, some would consider "financial crime" a very dangerous kind of crime.

      Why?

      Because "financial crime" undermines society itself. Look around you. The whole world is depending on the monetary system to work. And it only works as long as we - the users - trust that system. As such, "financial crime" is extremely dangerous for society because it destroys one of the most important foundations we depend on: money!

      The most serious "financial crime" is counterfeiting money. It is punished extremely hard, because such activity is a serious threat to society. If we can't trust money, the world will stop functioning. Like... really! stop functioning!

      The second-worst "financial crime" is forgery of documents where money is involved. The reasons are exactly the same as above. If you forge a check/document/contract in order to acquire someone else's money, that activity is a threat to an important foundation in society.

      We can continue to describe the many different grades and shades of "financial crimes", but if you think about the logic behind it, it kinda makes sense. The reasons for having harsh punishments for such crimes are all similar: It is a kind of crime which is very destructive for society as a whole.

      I am not saying that software piracy is as bad as rape. Nor am I saying that I agree with the course of action in this particular case. I am simply trying to explain the logic. Some laws are made to protect the individual, other laws are made to protect society as a whole. Are the former more important than the latter? Is there any reason to protect the individual, while society falls apart?

      That is the reason for harsh punishment of "financial crimes". You don't have to agree with these reasons - but I hope you will at least give it some thought.

      :-)

      - Jesper
      --
      My security clearance is so high I have to kill myself if I remember I have it...
  12. Re:non violent criminals by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That said, he did break the law when he pirated games

    And that is most likely also what the verdict is about. Notice how the modchips are mentioned, but nowhere that it's illegal to have, store, own or sell them?

    However, the punishment should fit the crime.

    Personally, I'd say that's about achived. He had "over 1000 Pirated Games" and got 90 days. Now, in many legal systems you'll find a system that trades "daily earnings" against a day in jail (provided you cannot pay or refuse to pay). I.e. 90 days jail is comparable to 3 months wages. In other words, the punishment per infringed copyright is (provided you earn, say, 2000 bucks a month) 6 bucks per infringement. Actually, less than 6 bucks, since it wasn't 1000 but "over 1000" copies found.

    I'd call that sensible.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  13. Devil's Advocate by PlatyPaul · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For what it's worth, the police involved were doing their jobs and doing them correctly and efficiently. Sure, you can disagree whether or not IP infringement (in whatever form) should or should not be a crime, but as of right now it is one. A police officer, presented with a crime in plain sight, cannot (and, I would dare to argue, should not) ignore it because they disagree over whether or not it should be a crime.

    Their job is to uphold the law. They did so. There is nothing wrong with that.

    If you're angry, then I seriously suggest that you write your Representative(s) and Senators.

    --
    Misery loves company. Online misery loves unsuspecting random strangers.
    1. Re:Devil's Advocate by pla · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I mostly agree with you, however, one peeve:

      police departments are usually broken down into divisions that each deal with their respective speciality.

      I have no problem with that - I even approve, if it means the police involved in any given specialty might know the difference between, say, art and a bomb.

      I have to disagree, however, that it doesn't mean some crimes get ignored in favor of what they choose to go after. As long as I can look forward to seeing a single spam email in my inbox every morning, they most assuredly have "better" things to do than go after modders, whitehats who should have kept their mouths shut, and foreign nationals protecting our freedom to use what we buy as we want.

      Until I can watch Alan Ralsky eaten alive by lions on PPV, they can better use any "computer crime" related resources.

  14. Don't do for profit by pembo13 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you're going to pirate, don't do it for profit. I can't support piracy for profit, sorry.

    --
    "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
  15. Well 16x is the Industry Standard.. by lmnfrs · · Score: 2, Insightful

    over 1,000 pirated game discs I wonder if there actually were 1,000 discs, or if the ESA is making up similar statistics like the RIAA did.. Maybe it was only 77 dual layer DVD discs, not 1,000 650MB CD's. That would be fun all over again.

    Actually, that was a pointless rambling.. I sincerely doubt the ESA would do something so laughably foul.

  16. Unbelievable by CXI · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The comments (so far) on this story are unbelievable. If you don't want to buy the game, then don't buy it. If you don't want to pay for the game but you steal it to play it anyway (or sell/distribute it illegally), then suck up the consequences.

    Real, actual, non-fictional people's salaries are based on the fact that if people play these games (or music, or movies) then they will pay for them. If you don't like the way the market works due to levels of compensation, etc. then feel free to get your media from those that offer it freely or at a rate you agree with and who base their economic plans on that fact.

    However if it's a commercial product and you steal it, then go to jail and shut up. You broke the law. Quit whining, quit the straw man style "rapists and murderers" blathering and learn something for a change. If you advocate open source and freely available media, quit giving our community a black eye by encouraging theft and cheering on pirates. If the new media model is going to work, it will work by being a better model, not by undermining the current system we have. Undermining rather than supplanting only encourages harsher laws and more intense DRM which will make the transition harder to accomplish in the end. Like I said, unbelievable.

  17. but by Pasajero · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't know you, but the paranoid in me likes to make 25 backup copies of each game I own, just in case...

  18. Mod Chips? by mhollis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    OK, I suppose I'm a little behind the times and I apologize for that. I also don't wish to start a flame-war here and I do believe that some people have pretty heated opinions about this.

    There are mod chips for my Prius. There are performance mod chips for lots of cars. While they may invalidate an owner's warranty (in some cases) one has purchased the car and is willing to install it and take a chance that maybe, perhaps, they either won't pass their vehicle emissions inspection or they may wear the car out a little sooner.

    So why is it illegal to make or sell a mod chip to make a game console work differently? If it invalidates one's warranty, well that's the chance you take--you cannot take the console back and get warranty service on it.

    I cannot see or understand a law that would prevent you from doing a mod on your PSP or X-Box. After all, you bought it; if you mod it it's yours so who cares?

    --
    Gods don't kill people, people with gods kill people.
  19. Criminal copyright violation - steep punitive fine by Torodung · · Score: 2, Informative
    To those who are "flying the Jolly Roger," RTFA guys:

    [He] was arrested in June for selling pirated games and mod chips over Craigslist and other online sites (emph. added) That was criminal copyright violation ("infringement for personal gain") long before the DMCA ever defaced the law books. He had a 1000 CD's ready to sell, and a stock of circumvention kits to go with it to enable his business.

    He was a counterfeiter. He should be thrown in jail with the rest of the drug dealers, prostitutes, con men and other smalltime ne'er-do-wells until he sobers up. This kind of thing must be pursued and stopped for the health of the industry, and the rule of law in general.

    This is going after the dealers instead of going after the junkies, and it's the right way to go. I applaud the San Diego police (and prosecutors) for going after folks are causing true harm.

    On the other hand, the punitive fine ($100,000 - ten times the awarded damages of $10,000) seemed absurdly steep. Without knowing the man's means, it's hard to believe that this was a fair judgment. It's a warning sign when the jail time and the punitive fines are so completely incongruous.

    --
    Toro
  20. Re:misleading? by UnlimitedAccess · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "A intellectual property holder has a right to control their assets just as much if not more than individuals." And I'm yet to be convinced piracy does anything but benefit the intellectual property holder. As an artist in any medium, your job is to get your material as much exposure as humanly possible. The more eyes the better. A producers's job is to find a way to make money from all these eyes. If you don't know how to do that, you shouldn't be in producing.