Slashdot Mirror


Self-Tuning Electric Guitar

avirrey writes "The Technology Review has an interesting article on a Gibson Self-Tuning Guitar. Purist argue that you shouldn't need a guitar that self-tunes. Others argue that this will allow an artist to change tuning with one 'favorite' guitar, instead of having to swap out between songs." Ok I know what I think- freakin' sweet. Only technology will guarantee my sucking on the electric will at least be reasonably in-tune suckiness. Dear Gibson, Slashdot really needs to review your guitar. We'll need several review units and we lost your return address.

58 of 389 comments (clear)

  1. Technical review... by xtracto · · Score: 4, Funny

    "...Know what I think- freakin' sweet. Only technology will guarantee my sucking on the electric will at least be reasonably in-tune suckiness. Dear Gibson, Slashdot really needs to review your guitar. We'll need several review units and we lost your return address..."

    Yeah, and since slashdot is made by its community, we will need 900,000 test units =o) (sorry 900000+ id noobs =oP no testing for you)

    --
    Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    1. Re:Technical review... by my+$anity++0 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Make that a flat million.

    2. Re:Technical review... by Swampash · · Score: 5, Funny

      No vibrato bridge. Less scale length than a Strat. Lame.

    3. Re:Technical review... by irtza · · Score: 4, Funny

      YES, 893217 makes the cut. Now, for me to practice my current great hit: random noise 44, soon to be followed by random noise 45. For those that missed random noise 1-43, I am afraid you will never get that opportunity as they're kind of hard to repeat... and I am not exactly sure how they go anymore.

      --
      When all else fails, try.
    4. Re:Technical review... by IconBasedIdea · · Score: 4, Informative

      Its a Gibson, not a Fender. Its always gonna be a shorter scale neck, and almost always without vibrato.

    5. Re:Technical review... by thc69 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wow, I feel old...

      --
      Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
    6. Re:Technical review... by Swampash · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wow, I had no idea. What a coincidence then that I chose exactly those two things to illustrate a point of difference between a Gibson and a Strat. I mean, holy cow, what's the chance of me doing that? It's just... freakish.

    7. Re:Technical review... by zeromorph · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ok stop it. Emacs/vi and GPL/BSD are bad enough if you go on like this we will also have a Fender/Gibson flamewar. What's next Beatles/Rolling Stones?

      --
      "Hannibal's plans never work right. They just work." Amy/A-Team
    8. Re:Technical review... by IQ60 · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is not news... Gibson is just copying Line6 http://www.line6.com/. Go to their site and watch the demos of their modeling guitars and amps. I have a high-end Line6 guitar that models many classics (like Gibsons) AND it came with software that lets me change not only tunings, but pickup position, body density, and a zillion other tweaks. These customizations then become available via a switch on the guitar. I can go from a Les Paul to a Marten to a drop-d strat to a C7 12-string and they all sound beautiful! Visit their site if you play guitar. (no I don't work for them I just love their products!)

    9. Re:Technical review... by robbiedo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Completely unnecessary technological twaddle. Modern string technology, quality tuners, quality guitar, and a decent tuner. Tuners are buit into practically everything guitar related. Cue the Whaambulance. Part of guitar's beauty is it's simplicity.

    10. Re:Technical review... by lastchance_000 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I want a Tom Servo to turn my tuning pegs.

      That would be fricken' awesome.

      He could comment on my playing, as well.

    11. Re:Technical review... by killproc · · Score: 4, Informative



      Actually, you should RTFA. The Gibson solution "PHYSICALLY" tunes the strings, not virtually like the Line 6.

      The new Fender VG Strat has a virtual mode that acts as you describe.

      From all the press, this new Gibson is the real deal.

      Hopefully my wife will "approve" another "investment".

      --
      When you die, on your deathbed, you will receive total consciousness. So I got that goin' for me, which is nice.
    12. Re:Technical review... by the_fat_kid · · Score: 2, Funny

      and you are going to try to convince us that Kirk isn't realy better than Picard....

      --
      -- Sig under construction...
    13. Re:Technical review... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'd like Microsoft Clippy.

      "It looks like you're trying to play a D chord! Would you like to:

      • Play a D Chord
      • Play the chord as-is
      • Look up chord fingerings in the online help
    14. Re:Technical review... by drcagn · · Score: 2, Informative

      Doesn't matter who made what when. The Beatles put out better music than the Stones did.

      --
      Scorta futuere amo!
    15. Re:Technical review... by pabrown85 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Joel was way better than Mike.

    16. Re:Technical review... by cleatsupkeep · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Neither - The Who.

    17. Re:Technical review... by Fordiman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hmmm... I wonder how much *more* difficult it would be to have the guitar tune 'live', ie: while playing. Check for a short along the fretboard on each string, and against additional tension above baseline (to compensate for intentional and unintentional bending and whammy bar use) and feed that data into the tuning processor.

      Would be awesome - how many times has your guitar gone out of tune while playing with brand skankin' new strings? I know you're supposed to stretch 'em out, but we're talking about a labor-saver here.

      Though, like I said, it'd probably be a lot more difficult; baseline tension would change the moment a bend was made (stretching of the strings).

      I wonder if resistance can be checked to put up a 'string needs replaced' idiot light? Ooh, how about a capacitance array just under the fretboard so that you can train your fretting tension to an ideal level?

      Hehe. Borg Guitar.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    18. Re:Technical review... by bumptehjambox · · Score: 2, Insightful
      What's next Beatles/Rolling Stones?

      The Who.

    19. Re:Technical review... by rikkards · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I should have been more clear, but Gibson has a digital guitar line "HDx" or something that is a Line6 ripoff. You are right the powertone is a mechanical device unlike the Line6 gear.


      It isn't even Gibson's invention. It is licensed to them from Tronical (which is mentioned in TFA)
    20. Re:Technical review... by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Tube amps are better than solid state amps.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    21. Re:Technical review... by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "You misspelled "Black Sabbath".

      Well, if this Gibson guitar came in an SG model...it WOULD be handy for doing some Sabbath, since Iommi does most of this stuff with the guitar tuned down. Less tension helps for his missing fingertips, and also is what contributed to making their 'dark' sound....

      Strange, if Tony hadn't had that accident....BS might not have found their trademark 'sound' or tone.....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    22. Re:Technical review... by tha_mink · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just because someone's fucking you up the ass, doesn't make them bisexual. I would have gone with ...

      "You're a good guy your whole life...then you suck *one* dick and all of a sudden you're a cocksucker."
      --
      You'll have that sometimes...
  2. determinism finally! by QuantumG · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As a software engineer, the one thing I hate about playing the guitar is that every time I pick it up I have to tune it, otherwise I won't get the same results as I did last time I sat down to strum. Is a little determinism too much to ask?

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
    1. Re:determinism finally! by xtracto · · Score: 4, Informative

      As a software engineer, the one thing I hate about playing the guitar is that every time I pick it up I have to tune it, otherwise I won't get the same results as I did last time I sat down to strum. Is a little determinism too much to ask?

      I do not know about the physics of that stuff, but I play guitar as a hobby (classical, flamenco and heavy metal [acoustic and electric) and from what I know, the amount of tunning you have to do depends on the material of the guitar (at least for acoustic) and the quality of the strings. Also, one of the things they told you to do after you just replaced a string is to stretch it a lot and loosen it to make it expand all the material has to expand, otherwise you will tune it but as the new string expands, you will have to tune it again in five minutes.

      I think this would be more appropriate for the likes of Joe Satriani or Steve Vai when in a concert they use a different tuning for some different songs... but I still like it more if they showcase different kinds of guitars and maybe it might be useful when/if they have to change tuning "on the fly".. but of course, it might not be possible to re-tune the guitar as fast as it is needed...

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    2. Re:determinism finally! by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Funny

      Funny, I always get the same results when I strum a guitar -- ear-destroying crap.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    3. Re:determinism finally! by my+$anity++0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Speaking as someone who just picked up the guitar about 2 months ago, I must say it's hard to play something genuinely bad-sounding on the guitar.
      Somewhat dissonant, maybe.
      Not good, maybe.
      But it takes a concerted effort to play painfully bad.

    4. Re:determinism finally! by martinX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the triangle woudn't have to be tuned too often.

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    5. Re:determinism finally! by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Funny

      But it takes a concerted effort to play painfully bad.

      Well thanks it feels good to have my hard work appreciated. :)

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    6. Re:determinism finally! by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think this would be more appropriate for the likes of Joe Satriani or Steve Vai when in a concert they use a different tuning for some different songs...

      I don't think it would, unless all the alternate tunings are very similar to each other.

      Getting the best sound out of a guitar using a specific tuning is not only a function of the tension on each string, but also the gauge and wrap of the strings. Take a guitar in normal EADGBE with medium-gauge strings and tune the bottom string down a step to D, and it'll still sound pretty close to ideal; but tune everything down a fourth to BEADF#B, and the sound will be thin and lifeless. You'll need to switch to heavier strings to play with that dropped tuning.

      Besides which, half of the fun of a Steve Vai show is to check out all the different guitar models he has. There's his standard Jem, and there's the one with the brilliant blue LEDs inlaid into the fret markers, and there's the enormous heart-shaped guitar with three necks...

    7. Re:determinism finally! by timeOday · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If this system is fast enough, it could re-tune between each strum so you can play an entire song on nothing but open chords!

    8. Re:determinism finally! by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 4, Informative

      WARNING: Do not strum guitar with remaining fingers.

    9. Re:determinism finally! by Mantaar · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'll make up an analogy that you, Mr. Software Engineer, should be able to understand:

      Self-tuning guitars are like IDEs. They can make it easier for the professional, but more often than not they don't.
      Let's explain this a bit:
      When I started to play the one most important thing I had to learn was to be able to tune my freakin' bass. While tuning, you will learn how your instrument sounds when it's OK and well-tuned and you'll learn to immediately recognize when it's mis-tuned and sounding strange. That knowledge can and will save your ass on stage and during rehearsal. A good novice's etude is the following: completely de-tune your instrument and then tune it without using an electrical tuner. Do that at least twice a week and in about half a year you'll be able to tune that thing alright, even if your shiny electric box is currently out of order. A few strings will probably go plunck! and take direction towards your face, but that's OK, because a scarred face and an empty purse are a musician's trademark. What is more important though is the fact that you'll have your ears trained - your hearing will have improved a real freaking lot!

      People who can't tune their instrument can't play it. Period. (I'm talking mostly about string/fret/fretless instruments here). And if you think you have to tune your instrument too often that's because your instrument sucks. Otoh, if you can't tune it properly, you suck, as a musician.

      That said, this can really be an interesting choice for a professional, as it's really a nuisance to have to tune your guitar on stage (or during rehearsals). This is not intended to make your practicing at home easier, but to get rid of one of the big problems that happen when some 3000+ W of electromagnetic radiation are frying you and your instrument on stage. Thus, if you really intend to become a competent player, you'll not use this unless forced to. Because the next time you sit around the camp fire, you'll get laughed at by the girls for not being able to properly tune that random piece of wood you've found somewhere. You see, just the same as with IDEs. If you intend to learn a language, better first learn to use a plain text editor and a shell, so you'll get behind the basic stuff. Getting to know your instrument is The Basic Stuff and one good method of achieving this goal is to tune your guitar on a regular basis. When you sit down to start practicing (or playing), the very first thing you do is check your strings and tune them! Consider this to be just another aspect of everyday life with your guitar.

      My personal opinion about this new technology is: I don't need that, mostly because my main instrument is a six-string fretless bass. But I fear many kids will rush into the store and learn to play on them - while completely ignoring everything I've said above. I hope Gibson will make those things reasonably expensive so that only professionals would consider buying one. The amount of horribly mistuned kids on stage is already way too high! (And now don't come and say: but this guitar will prevent mis-tuning on stage in the first place! No, it is not going to, as playing in tune does not only rely on your instrument to be tuned. You have to be able to fret your strings properly and do the one thing that's pretty much most distinctive about guitarists: bending. Here, no LED-featured toy will help you.)

      --
      I'm an infovore...
    10. Re:determinism finally! by Cecil · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The specific (and nearly impossible to perfectly replicate) sound that the vibrating strings make is the reason to play a guitar. Get rid of that and you might as well just use a synthesizer instead.

    11. Re:determinism finally! by yurnotsoeviltwin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The sound coming from the strings would be different, and the feel of the fretboard wouldn't be right. If my guitar is significantly out of tune, I can tell just from the feel of the string tension. If it gets bad enough, the strings rattle against the frets. A strum on a guitar is not just a set of six pure tones, it's a complex and beautiful thing.

    12. Re:determinism finally! by adminstring · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If the guitar is in tune with itself, an internal computer can shift pitches to give alternate tunings. That's what the Line6 Variax does. The problem is that if the guitar isn't in tune with itself, how does the guitar computer know if you are out of tune, or if you're just bending a string? You could run a guitar through an Antares Auto-Tune, but then when you bent a string, it would jump from one pitch to the next like a piano, and you'd lose a lot of the guitar's expressiveness for soloing.

      The good thing about the Gibson is that you only pull on the knob when you have strummed the open strings, so the guitar knows that no notes are being bent... it knows what the pitches should be when you strum open strings, so it has no problem tuning it to those pitches.

      Your idea could be implemented if, like on the Gibson, there were a button to let the guitar know it was in "tuning mode." When the button was pressed, the guitar would listen to see how out of tune it was, then when the button was released, the pitch-correction computer inside could change the pitch of each string by exactly the right amount to bring the guitar's output into tune, although the strings themselves would still be out of tune, and you could still bend them all you want without having the pitch "snap" to the next note like a vocal that has been auto-tuned.

      --
      My truck is like a series of tubes.
    13. Re:determinism finally! by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 2, Funny

      If this system is fast enough, it could re-tune between each strum so you can play an entire song on nothing but open chords!

      Then you could set it up with little hammers to hit the strings, and make rolled up punch cards to store the data on.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    14. Re:determinism finally! by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As a software engineer, my question is why electric guitars even *need* to be in tune? Just pump out whatever frequency that string is *supposed* to play to the amp.

      An electric guitar is not a digital, nor even an electonically-controlled, instrument. There are guitar synths, and electonically-controlled things like the Line6 Variax. But those aren't really "electric guitars".

      A solid-body electric guitar has magnetic coil transducers that generate an electrical signal as the metal strings vibrate in a magnetic field. That's pretty much it: no chips, not even transistors. It's a simple tool, rather in line with the Unix philosophy.

      You can then take that signal and pipe through whatever processing you want - off board, in your stomp boxes or rack effect units. But don't mess with the guitar, any more than you'd mess with grep by trying to make it include awk.

      This, though, is a mechanical thing, that just automates what the guitarist does when he looks at a tuner and frobs the tuning knobs until the needle hits center or the green light lights or whatever. It's a just a convenience, not a true alteration of function.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    15. Re:determinism finally! by fiendie · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ...maybe it might be useful when/if they have to change tuning "on the fly".. but of course, it might not be possible to re-tune the guitar as fast as it is needed... That mostly depends on the bridge type. If you have a fixed bridge like the Tune-o-matic on the Les Paul from the article it's fairly easy to change the tuning of individual strings. A very popular example are the so-called drop tunings, where you tune down the low E-string one step for easier fingering of power chords. With a fixed bridge all other strings stay more or less in tune. If you have a floating bridge like a Floyd Rose vibrato system, all other strings will go out of tune and it is very cumbersome to get the tuning right again.
  3. Can you hear the piezo output too? by insanecarbonbasedlif · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sounds good to me, as long as it does standard and drop-d. The one question I have is do the system allow you to output the piezo pickups as well, or are the solely reserved for tuning?

    --
    Just because I doubt myself does not mean I find your position compelling.
  4. Silly technological overkill by Neon+Aardvark · · Score: 5, Informative

    It takes me (and most other guitarists) a few seconds to tune a guitar.

    It's a pleasant, harmless little ritual, and somewhat calming before you play a gig.

    This is a silly and expensive gizmo, IMO.

    --
    Azural - instrumentals
    1. Re:Silly technological overkill by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Agreed, but there are five situations where it could be useful, IMHO:

      • Fast tuning changes mid-song (need to be in drop-D for a stretch).
      • If you left it on, the ability to instantly correct minor variations in pitch would make setting up the guitar almost a non-issue instead of a pain.
      • If you can make it cheap enough, it wouldn't matter if you didn't let the neck cure long enough (causing the axe to get out of tune constantly) so long as the hardware could keep up, so the crap guitars could get a lot better and/or the good guitars could start to really suck without anyone noticing.
      • It would be great when you're playing with four other guitar players and nobody seems to agree on the pitch.
      • Twelve string.
      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    2. Re:Silly technological overkill by smellotron · · Score: 2, Informative

      [Some n00b players] would rather spend time, which is money, practicing than tuning.

      As a data point, I own an Epiphone Les Paul. I would consider it an easy purchase for any middle-class slashdotter, or even a dedicated teenager ($400 new at Musician's Friend). I keep it in a hard case, and the only temperature/humidity swings it really has to deal with are car rides to practice (3 hours away). It is very good at staying in tune, even with weeks in between practice (1 string seriously out, everything else still ok). I've been considering getting new tuning pegs ($50), which would improve the issue.

      Point is, tuning really doesn't take that much time, and you don't have to shell out very much to get equipment that is "good enough". The only n00bs that should buy this are the ones with money burning holes in their pockets.

  5. I bet this will be a tough sell by Rizzle_p_Mizzle · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I agree that this looks like a super-neato piece of kit, but I would be willing to bet it will have trouble selling because: 1. It's one more thing that might break on stage. 2. Guitarist love tradition and tend to resist change. How long has the Les Paul been in production in its current form? Something like 60 years. The most revered amps are point-to-point wired vacuum tube models. Most people who are willing to drop this kind of coin on guitar gear would probably go for some aged custom model before they went for this. I'm not saying it's not useful, just that I would be surprised by significant commercial success.

  6. Re:I guess.... by venicebeach · · Score: 2, Insightful

    * I can "tune" the guitar arbitrarily. If I want to tune to 438 instead of 440, that needs to be allowed. If I want to tune everything down a half step, that needs to be possible without fighting or complaint. If I want open D, same notion
    It seems from TFA that you can do all of this. It comes with several preset tunings and you can program your own.

    * The guitar needs to be locked in a tuning. One thing you do NOT want is the guitar trying to retune itself while you're playing. This will create awkward sounds, and will also have disasterous results if you try and bend a note or (god help you) play slide.
    It has a knob that you pull out to turn the tuning mechanism on, then you turn it off while you are playing so it's not trying to adjust.

    I found this part of the technology to be especially clever:

    As the strings are played, the Powertune processor compares their actual frequencies with the desired notes and sends instructions--tighten the string this much, loosen the string by that much--to tuning pegs equipped with strong, tiny servo motors mounted on the back of the guitar's head. Because onstage interference could potentially degrade a wireless signal, the system uses the strings themselves to send the signal.
  7. I thought about doing that once. by dgatwood · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I thought about designing a self-tuning instrument once, but for piano, where the tuning process is a lot more painful. It would consist of basically a high speed camera and a strobe light that could be tuned to any frequency. For each piano pitch, it would hit the string, start the strobe, and compare the position on consecutive beats like a strobotuner, adjusting until it wasn't moving. Either that or just use a much faster high speed camera and skip the strobe light. The point is that by using optics instead of resonance, you could accurately discern an individual string's fundamental frequency without the need to stop down the remaining strings. Kind of what they did with piezo pickups, but a heck of a lot closer together. :-)

    The whole thing could be built into a block that snapped down onto the three pins on a given model of piano and took advantage of the fact that there's more than one of them so that it wouldn't have to mount to anything else. With the single bass strings, you'd have to tune them by hand, but they're the easy strings.

    Never built it. Never cared enough, never had time, never thought it would sell, etc.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    1. Re:I thought about doing that once. by Chirs · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You know they actually *have* self-tuning pianos? They run electric current through the strings to cause them to heat up and change their harmonics. No moving parts.

  8. I already have a tuner... by Landshark17 · · Score: 5, Funny

    All I want is an amp that goes up to 11.

    --
    This sig is false.
    1. Re:I already have a tuner... by soundonsound · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...
      ...
      ...
      This one goes to 11.

  9. Tuning a guitar is a ridiculous notion by Vainglorious+Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    How to play Guitar by David [Jad] Fair

    I taught myself to play guitar. It's incredibly easy when you understand the science of it. The skinny strings play the high sounds, and the fat strings play the low sounds. If you put your finger on the string father out by the tuning end it makes a lower sound. If you want to play fast move your hand fast and if you want to play slower move your hand slower. That's all there is to it. You can learn the names of notes and how to make chords that other people use, but that's pretty limiting. Even if you took a few years and learned all the chords you'd still have a limited number of options. If you ignore the chords your options are infinite and you can master guitar playing in one day.

    Traditionally, guitars have a fat string on the top and they get skinnier and skinnier as they go down. But he thing to remember is it's your guitar and you can put whatever you want on it. I like to put six different sized strings on it because that gives the most variety, but my brother used to put all of the same thickness on so he wouldn't have so much to worry about. What ever string he hit had to be the right one because they were all the same.

    Tuning the guitar is kind of a ridiculous notion. If you have to wind the tuning pegs to just a certain place, that implies that every other place would be wrong. But that absurd. How could it be wrong? It's your guitar and you're the one playing it. It's completely up to you to decide hoe it should sound. In fact I don't tune by the sound at all. I wind the strings until they're all about the same tightness. I highly recommend electric guitars for a couple of reasons. First of all they don't depend on body resonating for the sound so it doesn't matter if you paint them. As also, if you put all the knobs on your amplifier on 10 you can get a much higher reaction to effort ratio with an electric guitar than you can with an acoustic. Just a tiny tap on the strings can rattle your windows, and when you slam the strings, with your amp on 10, you can strip the paint off the walls.

    The first guitar I bought was a Silvertone. Later I bought a Fender Telecaster, but it really doesn't matter what kind you buy as long as the tuning pegs are on the end of the neck where they belong. A few years back someone came out with a guitar that tunes at the other end. I've never tried one. I guess they sound alright but they look ridiculous and I imagine you'd feel pretty foolish holding one. That would affect your playing. The idea isn't to feel foolish. The idea is to put a pick in one hand and a guitar in the other and with a tiny movement rule the world.

    --
    My next sig will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush
    1. Re:Tuning a guitar is a ridiculous notion by Rudi+G · · Score: 2, Informative

      Those of us who understand humor call people like you "dense".

  10. Strangely... by Belgand · · Score: 4, Funny

    In America, self-tuning guitar tunes itself. In Soviet Russia, self-tuning guitar is tuned by you!

  11. Use lever activated tuners by HockeyPuck · · Score: 2, Informative

    Michael Manring http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Manring uses a custom Zon Bass Guitar http://www.zonguitars.com/zonguitars/hyperbass.html. Below each tuning knob is a lever which can de-tune a string with just the flip of the switch. No fancy pickups, electronics etc. Sure if he needs to tune beforehand, he does it the old fashioned way (by ear, tuner etc..), but while playing he detunes in a flash. You can find him pretty easily on youtube http://youtube.com/results?search_query=Michael+Manring&search=Search

  12. NO CAR ANALOGY HERE! by el_flynn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    To me, this self-tuning guitar is to guitarists what script kiddies are to hackers, no? And I sure as hell would bet that Jimi Hendrix wouldn't sound like how he did if this type of thing was around.

    I don't know about you, but the minute "out-of-tune-ness" and things of that nature is what makes a musical performance sound more human. Similar analogy: quantizing and how that makes things so.. robotic..

    --
    The Wknd Sessions - Malaysian and South East Asia independent music
  13. Get a Uke! And enjoy real materials. by billstewart · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The standard for ukes is that you spend half your time tuning and half your time playing a bit out of tune. But maybe that's not the kind of consistency you meant?


    Real musical instruments are made of real materials like wood, metal, or nylon. As temperature and humidity change, the shape and flexibility of the parts are going to change, and the parts that are held by friction may also move. And the accoustics of the places you're playing will all be different, and the people you're playing with will have different skills and different instruments, and of course if people are singing their voices aren't super-consistent even if they can carry a tune, and sometimes your fingers or mind are more flexible than other times. And if you move your instrument around it'll also be affected by that. So go with the flow, listen to the sounds around you and adapt. (Oh, and bring an electronic tuner - they really do help unless you're one of those people with really good ears who can do it all with a tuning fork.)


    I recently opened my baritone uke bag and found that the thing had exploded - must have overheated in the car or something, because the strings had pulled the bridge off the body. That's a bit more extreme than the usual environmental changes in instruments, but it's reasonably large and I'd bought it for $20 on eBay. Glued the bridge back on, and it's sounding a little dull but the strings may need a bit of time to readjust.


    If you don't like all this analog behaviour, get yourself an electronic instrument. Or go with something semi-digital, like a horn with valves. The brass'll still change a bit with temperature, and your wind may vary with humidity as well as tiredness, and a small-mouthpiece instrument like a French horn is a lot less forgiving than a baritone horn or tuba. Or get yourself a slide trombone, where you're always going to have to move your the slide to the right distance to get just the right pitch...

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  14. Cool, BUT by Bluesman · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is a good idea, but ONLY if it tunes to drop D. I have wayyyy too much angst to play in standard tuning.

    --
    If moderation could change anything, it would be illegal.
  15. meh, Modeling Guitars are Much Nerdier! by Paul+Slocum · · Score: 3, Informative

    My friend recently got a Variax modeling guitar and I got to play it the other day. It looks like a really basic electric, but it has individual pickups for each string and a really realistic synth computer inside that models all kinds of guitars and other stringed instruments. And this ain't no crappy MIDI guitar, it responds naturally to bends, harmonics, etc. It can also do on-the-fly alternate tunings, but without actually changing the physical tuning! It feels so weird playing an electric guitar with a whammy bar and the sound of a banjo coming out.

    Then he set it up running into a pitch tracker outputting a sine wave, fed into a Marshal stack simulator. Try to beat that signal path!

  16. More Triangle! by deesine · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes, that's what we need, MORE triangle!

    --
    damaged by dogma