Slashdot Mirror


David Pogue Reviews the XO Laptop

Maximum Prophet writes "David Pogue, technology reviewer at the New York Times, has taken a first-hand look at the XO laptop, also known as the 'One Laptop Per Child' project, or the '$100 Laptop'. His reaction is very favorable, having tested it out via several criteria. And ultimately, he writes, the laptop is about more than just technology for the people. 'The biggest obstacle to the XO's success is not technology -- it's already a wonder -- but fear. Overseas ministers of education fear that changing the status quo might risk their jobs. Big-name computer makers fear that the XO will steal away an overlooked two-billion-person market. Critics fear that the poorest countries need food, malaria protection and clean water far more than computers. But the XO deserves to overcome those fears. Despite all the obstacles and doubters, O.L.P.C. has come up with a laptop that's tough and simple enough for hot, humid, dusty locales; cool enough to keep young minds engaged, both at school and at home; and open, flexible and collaborative enough to support a million different teaching and learning styles.'"

303 comments

  1. I for one... by Kiuas · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...welcome our new laptop using child hacker overlords.

    --
    "It is the business of the future to be dangerous" -Alfred North Whitehead
    1. Re:I for one... by wsanders · · Score: 1, Troll

      You misspelled "... new laptop using YET STILL ILLITERATE child hacker overlords."

      Although to be fair I think the OLPC project is more about replacing heavy, expensive, quickly-obsoleted textbooks than anything else.

      --
      Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
    2. Re:I for one... by geekoid · · Score: 2, Informative

      A well designed interface can still be used by 'YET STILL ILLITERATE' people.
      In fact I can think of a method right now to help ILLITERATE people become literate.

      But your right, these are for kids that do have a certain level of literacy.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...welcome our OLPC botnet overlords.

    4. Re:I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'm busy trying to imagine a Mesh Network Cluster of OLPC's sharing music.

    5. Re:I for one... by Nikker · · Score: 1

      You're forgetting these kids are at the stage where they are learning to read. Basically as children many of us were considered illiterate at their age. So are we saying we are wasting money teaching children to read if they already don't know?

      --
      A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
    6. Re:I for one... by moro_666 · · Score: 1

      I for one welcome the geek overlords who show us HTML source and claim it's Python (see the video, "nice work").

      But otherwise, thumbs up for OLPC, at least some poor kid will get to play tetris for what it's worth. And if 1 of 1000 kids of them learn to write python, even better.

      --

      I'd tell you the chances of this story being a dupe, but you wouldn't like it.
    7. Re:I for one... by koutbo6 · · Score: 1

      while your at it, imagine a Beowulf cluster of those.

      --
      You speak London? I speak London very best.
    8. Re:I for one... by wsanders · · Score: 1

      Geekoid had the better point. Actually, I would include PDF Reader as a "method right now to help ILLITERATE people become literate". Maybe even the OLPC "killer app", along with some kind of lightweight spreadsheet, graphing calculator, or graphing programming language. I am sure there may be others, but I don't think web surfing is one of them. You do need internet access on a OLPC type device, if only to update the device with new material.

      Mostly, I just resent my tax dollars and kids' time being wasted on computer literacy projects. If I could, I'd send my kids to a school with no computers. Ask any teacher - until they are high school age, there's nothing they can't learn better from a good teacher. PCs in schools are the modern day equivalent of the "lets watch movies day" lampooned on the Simpsons.

      Dunno why I got moderated troll. I think both responses were reasonable, and personally I might even buy a OLPC device under the buy one donate one campaign.

      --
      Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  2. Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What these well-meaning folks never seem to consider is that not all these kids are going to use their laptops for education and nice stuff like that. A third-world kid, given the internet might well decide to use it for things like scams (especially when he is exposed to the vast wealth of the first-world) and, of course, porn.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      And, of course, trying to take over the world!! Right, Pinky?

    2. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by everphilski · · Score: 1

      I think so, Brain, but pantyhose are so uncomfortable in the summertime!

    3. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by semiotec · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What critics like you never seem to consider is that perhaps they _have_ considered the possibility and concluded that the benefit it will bring these countries and children outweighs the harm that some individuals might do?

      Or are you advocating that we should just cut them loose entirely? embargo the entire continent until they've managed to pull themselves up to the first world standard, just in case any aid we give them backfires on us? (yes, I am well aware that I am exaggerating for the sake of dramatics).

    4. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by AaxelB · · Score: 1, Troll

      I'm not sure exactly where I stand in this argument, but the natural rebuttal is that the money spent on computers for the children might be better spent on things like malaria research/treatment and providing more food. It's not so much "computers could be used for bad, so we shouldn't get them," but more like "computers come with a small number of bad things, whereas only good can come from giving starving people food."

    5. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1
      OLPC is providing mechanism, not policy.
      You seem to have the negative view of human nature posed by some of old:

      "For two and a half years Bet Shammai and Bet Hillel debated this question.
      These said: It would have been better for man not to have been created than for him to be created.
      These said: It is better for man to have been created, than for him not to have been created.
      They concluded: It would have been better for man not to have been created, but now that he has been created - let him examine his deeds." (Eiruvin, 13: 72).
      http://kerenyishai.org/shiur_english/bereshit61.htm
      I'd take the view that, if enough are helped, the urge to waste the gift may be minimized.
      You at least have to give Negroponte et al. credit for doing something
      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    6. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by dragonsomnolent · · Score: 1

      Favorite Pinky and the Brain exchange ever: "Um, I think so Brain, but me and Pippi Longstockings, what would the kids look like?" (I know I know offtopic, but what the hell, I had to say it)

      --
      I got nuthin
    7. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 2

      I know I'll be buying four of them for Xmas, two for poor kids, one for my daughter, one for my niece. She's only just turned seven, and is already designing video games in Squeak, which comes with the OLPC, so I imagine this will work well for her.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    8. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > whereas only good can come from giving starving people food

      Not entirely true.

      Merely giving handouts takes responsibility away from the
      recipient. They begin to abdicate responsibility for their
      own destiny. While superficially charitable, such handouts
      can prevent people from solving their own problems in a
      manner much more effective than "outsiders" would.

      Give a man a fish and you may end up with a dependent mooch.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    9. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by Deadplant · · Score: 2, Insightful

      and? your argument seems to be that people should be kept ignorant and powerless because some people will use knowledge and power for evil.
      I don't think you've thought your cunning plan all the way through...

      (I think I'll just bite my tongue on the porn issue for the moment)

    10. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by Braino420 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ya, it's a good thing that scams and porn don't happen on America's internets. Because if it did, that would definitely outweigh ANY benefits whatsoever and should definitely be shut down. If it can be used for bad, I DONT WANT ANY. Seriously though, are you joking as much as I am?

      I love it when people take initiative to do what they think is the right thing, and then the people sitting on the sidelines are like, "Oh, you're doing it all wrong, you should do absolutely nothing like me." It really makes life entertaining for me.

      --
      They call me the wookie man, I guess that's what I am
    11. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by whistlingtony · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ha!

      If those kids become socially, technically, and linguistically educated enough to run the scam, I'd say the laptop is a success. The kids will have learned english gooder... :D They'll have figured out the wonders of email, not to mention begun a lifetime of tinkering with the backgrounds of things instead of taking what's presented to them, and they'll have savvied up to American culture. They'll be reading more, writing more....

      It's jaded and crappy, but how is that not a success still?

      And Porn? Well, you could make a case that porn, put in the hands of a kid that doesn't understand that the context, could warp normal sexual relationships. I think the rampant religion has already done that though, so no worries.... Remember, sex is BAD kids! The dinosours died because you touch yourself at night.

    12. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by hayek_fan · · Score: 1

      Not really. Only bad things come from giving starving people food - they get used to it (hence expect further supplies in the future) and it costs you money without any possibility of ROI. Giving them a computer (not for porn / surfing the web, but to allow them to have more than one book per class), you give them education, improve GDP etc.

    13. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by foobsr · · Score: 1

      whereas only good can come from giving starving people food

      Especially if it is GM crops.

      CC.

      --
      TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
    14. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by maxume · · Score: 1

      Malaria is well addressed by spot application of DDT. Really. Sure, making it more treatable is wonderful, but there are excellent control methods available. As far as spending money on food goes, there is a growing movement who believe that poverty is often a result of structural economic problems, and better addressed politically than with gifts of food. Educating millions is a great way to influence politics.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    15. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by GnarlyDoug · · Score: 1
      Hmmm. Fire can be used for evil as well. I guess by your logic that whole fire thing was a bad idea as well.

    16. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      are you advocating that we should just cut them loose entirely?

      Of course not. But it is, nonetheless, an issue that can get lost in OLPC "Making the world a better place" rhetoric. We shouldn't go into this with rose-colored glasses, with blind idealism.

      When the very poor and uneducated encounter the world of the (relatively) educated and wealthy, it can inspire some of them to improve themselves. But, in others, it can inspire resentment and envy.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    17. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      might be better spent on things like malaria research/treatment and providing more food.

      Should we stop spending money on schools, and spend it on malaria research/treatment and providing more food instead?

      Why not use a multilayer approach? Communication can be key to getting food, and to combating malaria.

      Not everyone in the third world is starving in a malaria invested jungle.

    18. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FIRE BAD!

      BREAD GOOD!

    19. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you say "we" I assume this means that you yourself have contributed something significant to the effort?

    20. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by deacon · · Score: 0, Troll

      Oh, the malaria problem was under control many years ago.
      It was called DDT.

      Then some rich white people decided that bird egg shells were
      more important than brown people half a world away.

      Bu-Bye DDT. Bu-Bye brown people.

      It's the usual story of the Eco-Warriors :
      We had to destroy the indigenous people in order to save them. We had to deny them access to modern jobs (like mining) and modern products (like cars) in order to preserve their primitive purity. We value brown people in their Noble Savage state, and we will spare no sacrafice to keep them there.

    21. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by Deadplant · · Score: 1

      ...whereas only good can come from giving starving people food. nonsense.
      what if hitler were starving and you gave him food? hunh? hunh? what then eh? ;)
      In any large enough group of people there will be some who will commit crimes, rape, murder and such.
      By preventing the starvation of the group you have given these rapists the power to continue raping.

      It is the same thing.
      the heart of the parent's post was that because the recipients of these laptops are poor they will be more likely to commit crimes than would be rich western kids.
    22. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by semiotec · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We shouldn't go into this with rose-colored glasses, with blind idealism.

      Yes, but projects like this are driven by idealism in the first place. I suppose there are differences between practical and blind idealism, but while it is important to note the possible pitfalls, it is also equally important not to lose sight of the ideal.

      I hope this is not sounding evangelical already, but I believe the OLPC team (both administrative and technical sides) have considered most if not all the possible eventualities this project may encounter and decided to go ahead with it anyway.

      So there will always be some bad apples, but that's the same everywhere. There are plenty scammers on the internet from first world countries too. Just because people don't live below the poverty line doesn't mean they don't want to acquire wealth in dodgy manners, in fact, they are even more creative at it. Equally, just because people live below the poverty line doesn't mean they all want to scam money from richer folks.

      By some people's standards, I am probably living in the slums. I've heard of people living in styles where their daily expenses are greater than my annual income, but I don't really feel the need to con money out of these "rich" people. At the same time, I know many people who are in much worse financial situations than myself, but I've not felt they are trying to take advantage of me financially.

      I suppose you are arguing that by given technological tools to poor people, we are giving them the possibility to commit offences. But (let me put on my rose-tinted glasses) we are also at the same time enabling others the opportunity to do good, and hopefully in the long run, the good will outweigh the bad.

    23. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by GnarlyDoug · · Score: 1
      Lao Tzu - "Give A Man A Fish, Feed Him For A Day. Teach A Man To Fish, Feed Him For A Lifetime".

      As to your claims that malaria research (DDT anyone) and giving away food (cycles of dependancy, destroy ability to local farmers to sell food, acts as subsidies for dictators) is nevery bad, that is simply naive. There is a reason so much of the third world resembles inner city ghettos. Constant welfare destroys economies and enslaves people.

      I'm with Lao Tsu on this one. Giving people only consumables and denying them knowledge and tools to better themselves is foolish. Giving the laptops away might lead to good. Giving away food except for short term disaster relief is gauranteed to promote evil.

    24. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Or the ever popular:
      Those in power subvert the lions share of the aid resources leaving the people in a worse state: no food and a well supplied oppressor.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    25. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      the natural rebuttal is that the money spent on computers for the children might be better spent on things like malaria research/treatment and providing more food.

      Giving the poor food and you feed them for a day, but if you give them the chance to earn money and you feed them for life. As the Christian saying goes "give a man a fish, feed him for a day, teach him to fish and feed him for a life." Improving education will improve people's lives by allowing them the opportunity to work productive jobs and earn money. It's not an either or situation. More jobs means more can afford health care as well as more food. With a greater demand of healthcare health care jobs will be created. The same with food, the more people can afford for food the greater the demand for farms and farm workers. It's virtually a virtuous circle. Improvement in education creates jobs which both improves education and creates more jobs.

      In a sense that's what I see this project being about, improving lives. As it is now most of the aid the First World gives to the Third World makes things worse not better. Either money or food is given. The money given only is used to reinforce the power of those given the money which is usually government and it's frequently corrupt. The food given to the hungry creates dependency. Give food this week, month, or year, and more will be needed next week, month, or year. However giving people the resources to grow food and they can take care of themselves. Having some be able to grow food then others can make things or provide services.

      Falcon
    26. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      WTF kind of argument is that?

      I suppose I get your point, but man that's rough around the edges, that and godwin's law and all.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    27. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Malaria is well addressed by spot application of DDT

      Fabulous, it's not like farmers have to deal with ecosystems collapsing because all the birds in the area that eat all the other insects have been wiped out.

    28. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by nuzak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Birds eat bugs. But I guess we can just pour on more DDT to make up for their being gone.

      And most of the people in these countries would prefer that rich white people stopped poisoning their environment.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    29. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      Those in power subvert the lions share of the aid resources leaving the people in a worse state: no food and a well supplied oppressor.

      Which is why different groups should provide aid instead of one, the government. Have churches and evangelicals, groups like Save the Children and OxFam, as well as local groups help.

      Falcon
    30. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by AeroIllini · · Score: 1

      Oh, yes. Only good. No one would ever corrupt humanitarian programs.

      --
      For security, the MD5 hash of this message and sig is 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
    31. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by milo_a_wagner · · Score: 1

      The ramifications of this ostensibly laudable initiative are twofold. On the one hand, many features of the laptop encourage enquiry, learning and debate, such as the one enabling kids to decompile, understand and edit the programs they use every day. This encourages children to find out how a computer really works.

      However, access to computers, and therefore to the internet, raises another, decidedly more sinister, possibility. Burgeoning access to the internet in South Africa is having at least one disastrous effect: the ill-educated are being mercilessly exposed to horrifically pernicious AIDS denialism. Many believe that there's no such thing as too much information, and that widening access to the web can only be a good thing. Yet the spread of the internet in South Africa is fuelling the spread of lies and misinformation about the fatal disease, its aetiology and possible treatments. Wouldn't our money be better spent on schools? Hospitals? Medicine?

      Whether this is a step forward, or one back, who's to say?

      --
      Man wird am besten für seine Tugenden bestraft.
    32. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by notthe9 · · Score: 1

      Don't give those developing-world children laptops! Only rich, white children should be able to perform illicit activities on the internet!

    33. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by maxume · · Score: 1

      I'm not talking about going back to the good old days of fun with DDT at the local pool and mass aerial spraying, I'm talking about limited use inside of homes.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    34. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by enrevanche · · Score: 1

      But, in others, it can inspire resentment and envy.

      Being just a little bit paranoid?

    35. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by glittalogik · · Score: 1

      Mine is "I think so Brain, but then I'd be called Thumby."

    36. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by shellbeach · · Score: 1

      and, of course, porn. But that's what the "yo-yo-like pull-cord charger" is for. From TFA:

      "one minute of pulling provides 10 minutes of power"

      Browse porn and recharge your batteries ... these guys think of everything!

    37. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by markov_chain · · Score: 1

      "Give a man a fire, warm him for a day. Set a man on fire, warm him for a lifetime." - Unknown

      --
      Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
    38. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by Gideon+Fubar · · Score: 0, Troll

      good one kid. you'll go far in life.. provided no one decides not to feed you because you're a rapist.

      --
      http://www.xkcd.com/354/
    39. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by Deadplant · · Score: 1

      I guess my sarcasm didn't come through in that last post.
      I was mocking the original post by elrous0 by taking his point to an extreme.

    40. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by algoa456 · · Score: 1

      Only the kids who have electricity will be able to pull these scams. The others will use them as a lid to stop the chickens eating the corn in the pot. Only a geek could come up with such an impractical use of resources for the developing world. A kind of "let them eat cake" solution for the developing world poor.

    41. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by dns_server · · Score: 1

      I believe the quote is from Jingo by Terry Pratchett: "Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life."

    42. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by dangitman · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yet the spread of the internet in South Africa is fuelling the spread of lies and misinformation about the fatal disease, its aetiology and possible treatments

      It could be worse. They could be using MySpace.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    43. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by dangitman · · Score: 1

      The others will use them as a lid to stop the chickens eating the corn in the pot. Only a geek could come up with such an impractical use of resources for the developing world.

      The machines have a built-in charger. Or are you not capable of reading?

      A kind of "let them eat cake" solution for the developing world poor.

      You'd probably think about it differently if you were actually poor yourself. Do you actually believe that poor people shouldn't be exposed to technology or given opportunities to learn about it?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    44. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by azenpunk · · Score: 1

      i'd rather have some 3'd world kid get into financial internet scams than end up joining some local warlords death squads.

    45. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      If some kids discover that these computers could be used for scams and porn, then those are the kids that are gonna be the future tech nerds. When I got my first computer in the early 90s, and discovered that I could flame people from miles away and see dirty pictures that I've never been able to access before, I made it my duty to learn all I could about this new and amazing invention. Now here I am 15 years later and am a tech nerd who works with computers every day and I make a living off of it. If the only thing I had access to on my computer was an encyclopedia, my life would have been very different.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    46. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by drseuk · · Score: 1

      The http://dopewars.sourceforge.net/ (Afghani-fork) i18n team is working hard to ensure these laptops are put to a more profitable use such as learning about the world through play.

    47. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You can go even further... the easy availability of food causes rapid growth of the population, and then the food supply is overtaxed and lots of people starve. It's best to make food hard to get... fewer people starve and the entire planet fares better.

      see: http://64.233.169.104/search?q=cache:kBxlpeFsObYJ:media.anthropik.com/pdf/hopfenberg2001.pdf+foodpop&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us

      http://potluck.com/2001/01/the-unsustainability-and-origins-of-socioeconomic-increase/

    48. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by The+Fun+Guy · · Score: 1

      Which is why we should go straight to the heart of the matter. Once they have access to any kind of technology, they could use it for evil, nasty or just distasteful and self-serving purposes. The solution is obvious.

      Make sure they never learn to read. That way, they can never, ever cause any trouble.

      --
      The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain
    49. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by neomunk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And with that, we've come back full circle to the topic of the XO.

      This machine has a high likelihood (if coupled with an internet connection, and that is being developed alongside the XO, IIRC) of creating blogs of starving villages. These WILL get noticed, and WILL receive charitable donations whether solicited or not from bleeding hearts. ('bleeding hearts' not meant derisively)

      Put another way, I think there's a really good chance that these laptops will actually end up feeding people, very possibly more people than the equivalent amount spent on food, by making them more a part of the *OVERUSED EUPHEMISM WARNING* 'global village'. It'll bring their reality into our personal world more.

      For example, when a person's kid tells them that their friend that they talk to over the internet hasn't been to school for 4 days because he/she is too hungry to walk there, said person has a much higher chance of writing a charitable check than seeing the kids on the Save the Children Fund commercials, at least in my opinion.

    50. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Botnets!

    51. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by Goaway · · Score: 1

      That is a plain and simple lie, spread by anti-enviromentalist interest groups.

      DDT is in widespread use against malaria all over the world right now. Everybody agrees that this is a good thing.

      What is banned is the agricultural use of DDT - dumping huge amounts of it on crops. This is banned not only because it creates enviromental problems, but alos because it breeds DDT-resistant mosquitoes, allowing malaria to spread unchecked.

      Stop spreading this lie.

    52. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by thrillseeker · · Score: 1

      And most of the people in these countries would prefer that rich white people stopped poisoning their environment.

      You've never suffered yourself or had a child die from malaria, have you?

    53. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by Retric · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but Lao Tzu said "Give A Man A Fish, Feed Him For A Day. Teach A Man To Fish, Feed Him For A Lifetime". So it's not a Christian saying just something Christians stole from a culture and now think of as theirs; like Christmas.

      Anyway, more money (total value of goods) comes out of Africa than goes into it. Basically the west's farm subsidies destroyed the value of local farm economies and we now extract a lot of raw materials from the ruins of their economies. Food aid makes this process somewhat worse by preventing mass death that would adjust the local population size to something the local ecosystem is able to support.

      PS: If Africa's population was 10% what it is now their would be far fewer problems. For an example of this look at how the black death boosted the standard of living of those left alive. The problem is going from A to B without mass death. Granted, there are significant political issues related to the random political borders etc but that landscape is way to complex for such simple analysis.

    54. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by rockmuelle · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm not sure that the assumption that kids will be the primary users of these laptops is even valid.

      I've done volunteer work in 3rd world nations and the one thing we really needed was realiable, weather-proof computers with wireless communication. The first thing I thought of when I played around with an OLPC was how great the platform was for remote areas. In these environments, the standard practice is to get hand-me-down laptops from 1st world countries. These tend to vary from barely working 386-based systems to more modern Mac and Windows machines with serious battery issues. Having a rugged, field-rechargable platform would simplify a number of applications - from simple logistics (keeping track of local resources and trade), to tracking human rights abuses (what I was doing), to the more nefarious military/rebel/drug-running uses (which is what I personally think most OLPCs will be appropriated for). I suspect adults will quickly become the primary users of XOs.

      I haven't seen any serious discussion about this possible (probable) use of the OLPC and would like to see what other people think (esp. if you've worked in these areas before).

      -Chris

    55. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      Put another way, I think there's a really good chance that these laptops will actually end up feeding people, very possibly more people than the equivalent amount spent on food, by making them more a part of the *OVERUSED EUPHEMISM WARNING* 'global village'. It'll bring their reality into our personal world more.

      I've said basically the same thing elsewhere when posting about this article. For instance if these laptops were built in the areas where they are being used. I've specifically mentioned Brazil as an example. If the XO were built in the favells of Sao Paulo, Brazil, it would mean building them would create jobs The construction or renovation of the building will means jobs if only temporary. Those who actually build them will learn skills for building computers for businesses as well as homes. Others may learn programming. With more people earning more money they will create a demand for more and better food, which creates an incentive for many of those leaving the countryside to move to the cities to stay there. With more able to pay more for food agricultural workers can be paid better, and since they are paid better they will create demand for other things such as better healthcare and education.

      Falcon
    56. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but Lao Tzu said "Give A Man A Fish, Feed Him For A Day. Teach A Man To Fish, Feed Him For A Lifetime".

      No matter who said it it still applies. However thanks for informing me Lao Tzu said it, I'll check on it.

      So it's not a Christian saying just something Christians stole from a culture and now think of as theirs; like Christmas.

      Every Christian holiday or celebration can be traced back somewhere else, each has a pagan, heathen, or other root. Christians have even taken others as their saints. Heck Christians even built their churchs on someone else's sacred site.

      Anyway, more money (total value of goods) comes out of Africa than goes into it.

      Diamonds, gold, and other metals like coltan are extracted from Africa and the average African see nothing from it, except for conflicts and death. Most if not all of the fighting in Africa is over a natural resource.

      Basically the west's farm subsidies destroyed the value of local farm economies and we now extract a lot of raw materials from the ruins of their economies

      Which is why the WTO meetings in Geneva failed. Nations like Brazil and India demanded the west; Europe, Japan, and the US to stop subsidizing agriculture in those countries. These subsidies distort the market, a US farmer is able to grow, harvest, then ship produce to most places cheaper than farmers there can grow food. And not because because the farmer has lower costs but because the government gives them billions of dollars in subsidies. Eventually India walked out because the west wouldn't budge. The US offered to lower some subsidies some but the EU and Japan refused to.

      Food aid makes this process somewhat worse by preventing mass death that would adjust the local population size to something the local ecosystem is able to support.

      Actually aid hurts because it drives farmers off of their farms. Afterall why should a farmer stay on a farm bleeding, sweating, and going into debt when western food is imported into his or her country and sold for less than they spend growing food?

      Granted, there are significant political issues related to the random political borders etc but that landscape is way to complex for such simple analysis.

      Yea, politics has a lot to do with it. At one tyme Zimbabwe used to be the breadbasket of south Africa, they were able to grow enough to feed Zimbabwe and still was able to export a lot of food, agriculture used to be the country's major money earner. However after president Robert Mugabe came to power he forced all of the white farmers off of the farms then gave them to his cronies and supporters. Because these people didn't know how to farm they weren't able to grow food. So now Zimbabwe is a basket case instead of a breadbasket.

      Now this isn't true everywhere. For instance Ethiopia, it used to grow enough food too however because of droughts they haven't been able to grow enough. And some blame global warming on the drought. It's complicated but if the warming affected rainfall it would impact farming.

      Falcon
    57. Re:Don't assume they'll be just be used for good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to start a flame war. I'd use the word retard, but it would be an insult to people who, through no fault of their own, do not have the metal capacity to function normally in society. I have taught pre-schoolers in a third world country. I had to raise funds to obtain simple resources like play material, chalk, writing and coloring work books. The XO is the success of people doing whats right to raise a better global society without enriching fat and ungly thrid world dictatorships. I have seen what is possible in the US in so far as electronic education is concerned. I hate to see short sighted opinions like this one taken seriously. In the US there are technological solutions that firewall objectionable content from reaching impressionable young minds in the school setting, and the teacher has access to whatever the child is viewing on their computer during class activity. This is not difficult to implement with the XO device in a third world country given the dependence on institutional internet connecitvity. Kids will always be kids, but I am saddened deeply by the posts in this thread that allude towards problems that kids (kids kids kids) are not responsible for, like poverty. There are people out there that are willing to direct their altruistic energy at the real issues that overwhelm thrid world countries, for example, the institutionalization of poverty by governments that marginalize constituents for political reasons. I beleive there exists fear in non-performing goverments that devices such as the XO shall be a source of foreign propaganda directed to topple governments. Cummon! SCAMS! Western kids the world over have access to much faster computers and networks, and have they been cooking up schemes and scams to take advantage of firs world wealth? They might be better positioned to understand how to take advantage of this! But, do they do this! Seriously! I have lived in the third world over 15 years and I can tell you for sure that at the present time there are few countries with fast internet, money transfers and currency exchanges are largely controlled by the government PERIOD - so tell me how itty bitty kids are supposed to get around a deeply ingrained government bureaucracy.

  3. $100 laptop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More like $399 laptop, AM I RITE?

  4. Yo, Editors: by CompMD · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Pogue" is the spelling.

  5. Of course there's fear. by Mahjub+Sa'aden · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you take a path no-one has taken before, you're basically risking your reputation (and I guess in the countries in question your life as well) on something that isn't proven to work. Or, in the case of Windows, isn't proven to sort of work.

    The real question becomes, then, how afraid are you? Innovation always involves fear. But it involves ridiculous rewards when you're right.

    When you consider that the course of action in question involves the betterment of an entire generation of children, and quite possibly their children as well, you can't be faulted for at least trying something new. Even something untested, because face it, your old and busted way isn't working very well.

    --
    What is is all that is. Isn't that obvious?
    1. Re:Of course there's fear. by NearlyHeadless · · Score: 1

      Hopefully, trying out XO will involve a few dozen pilot projects in different countries. Given what studies have shown in the U.S. about the value of computers to education, I expect the pilot projects to show that the laptops would be a tremendous waste of money .

    2. Re: Of course there's fear. by Mahjub+Sa'aden · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If it were merely education in a classroom setting, I could see it as a distraction, a detriment of some kind. But the XO is about a different kind of education entirely, one not driven (necessarily) by classroom learning. It's about enabling a generation to become familiar with computers, with computing metaphors, and even better, UNIX.

      It could be like a quantum leap for an entire generation of kids. They might take it to the next level. Punch it up a notch. Fly high. Other metaphors and similes.

      --
      What is is all that is. Isn't that obvious?
    3. Re:Of course there's fear. by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      "...because face it, your old and busted way isn't working very well."

      If that was a reason for changing things at our society, we'd be much better.

  6. Eh? by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Big-name computer makers fear that the XO will steal away an overlooked two-billion-person market. Why should anyone care what they think? If they're not going to produce a similar product that that two billion person market can afford, to heck with them. Of course they'll loose the sale if no one can afford their product.
    1. Re:Eh? by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      I hope they loose a sale. I'm always on the hunt for a good deal...

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    2. Re:Eh? by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Why should anyone care what they think?
      Because they're rich and powerful. You might as well ask, "Who cares what the neighborhood lion wants for dinner?"
    3. Re:Eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cyrus Farivar has some interesting views in Slate http://www.slate.com/id/2174599/fr/flyout He claims no country has actually signed onto this program and the production forecasts have been steadily dropping. He makes an interesting observation that many if not most new technologies that benefit the third world were first deployed (and paid for) in first world countries at much higher prices. Kind of Tesla's plan for deploying expensive rich people electric cars first. It will be fascinating to see how this works.

    4. Re:Eh? by Enrique1218 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would be afraid if dell made a $200 laptop. They can't keep a $1,000 laptop from exploding. Can you make a laptop any shittier?

      --
      You don't have to be smart to use a Mac, you just have to be smart enough to buy one
  7. xoxoxo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pougue, noun:

    1 :to flail with a keyboard
    2 :any of various techniques inferior to actual editing

  8. Can I flash the thing by DrXym · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I'd possibly buy one for $400 but I wouldn't want the software that comes with it. I hope Bitfrost is disabled and you can flash an alternative OS onto it. Otherwise it's the Asus Eee PC for me. To be honest I really need something like these PCs. A normal laptop is too heavy, too expensive, too fragile to take on short breaks or travelling. These things fit the bill perfectly. I can see an enormous market for them.

    Maybe they should even sell a proper commercial OLPC (in black perhaps) to consumers expressly for this purpose. Use the profits to subsidize the educational version.

    1. Re:Can I flash the thing by everphilski · · Score: 1

      I'd possibly buy one for $400 but I wouldn't want the software that comes with it. I hope Bitfrost is disabled and you can flash an alternative OS onto it. Otherwise it's the Asus Eee PC for me. To be honest I really need something like these PCs. A normal laptop is too heavy, too expensive, too fragile to take on short breaks or travelling. These things fit the bill perfectly.

      I got a Compaq for $350 a few weeks ago. 15" widescreen, NVidia accelerated graphics. Just over 5 pounds, feels sturdy in my hands. I use it to cart numbers between work/school/home as I work on my PhD. The XO weighs over 3 pounds and is worse in every techinical respect (processor, memory, hard disk space, drives, etc). Does 2 pounds really make or break portability to you?

    2. Re:Can I flash the thing by MBCook · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bad comparison. Is you Compaq designed to take all sorts of abuse, and be able to withstand water and dust and such? How long does your Compaq run on battery? Does it have no moving parts other than the keyboard? Or is it rather fragile.

      This is not designed to compete in the regular laptop market, but if they upped the keyboard to adult size it would probably work for 90+% of US citizen's real needs.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    3. Re:Can I flash the thing by everphilski · · Score: 1

      Is you Compaq designed to take all sorts of abuse, and be able to withstand water and dust and such?

      For the average adult? Yea. I wasn't saying the XO should be replaced by a Compaq, I said for this particular user.

      And yes, my two year old son spilled a cup of water on it two weeks ago. Still alive and kicking :)

    4. Re:Can I flash the thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously they aren't going to sell locked laptops to individual consumers. That was a feature that was reluctantly added at the request of several countries, with the intention of unlocking the laptop when the child leaves school.

      But you should evaluate the size of the laptop carefully... If you are not going to give it to a child (and if you have moderately sized hands and intend to do a lot of typing), it may not be for you; the keyboard is quite small.

      I'm not sure how the Asus machine compares... If the Asus is the same size, its keyboard may be equally cramped, but the keys may be easier for an adult to use; the XO's are sealed rubber which is more rugged but may be less comfortable.

      I think the XO would work pretty well for less keyboard-intensive things, like its "game"/tablet mode, but I don't think there's a lot of software support for that yet. The tablet mode is one thing the Asus doesn't have, though.

    5. Re:Can I flash the thing by timeOday · · Score: 5, Informative

      The XO weighs over 3 pounds and is worse in every techinical respect (processor, memory, hard disk space, drives, etc).
      RTA!
      • 6-24 hours(!!!) of run-time
      • The XO's battery is good for 2000 charges and costs $10
      • The XO has a 200 DPI daylight visible screen(!!!)
      • It can run on a 1' square, $12 solar panel
      • Spill-proof keyboard
      Just like the article says, this laptop has many significant advantages - not just over your $350 Compaq, but over my $3000 Thinkpad. I would really like to get one of these for my 9 year old - and I have no doubt my wife and probably myself would be stealing it often!
    6. Re:Can I flash the thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just get a compact USB keyboard that you like. If you want something small and nice, and you can stand to pay a high price for it, look no further than the Happy Hacking keyboard; but I guarantee you can find something at your price point, especially if you can stand for it to be a bit big.

      Also you could get a USB Bluetooth adapter, and use one of the compact folding travel keyboards.

      The builtin keyboard is fine, for what it is. If you need something else, just get something else.

    7. Re:Can I flash the thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think you or your wife would enjoy it very much if you have another PC handy. The keyboard is simply too small for adults to use, although all the other features are great.
      But that's basically a good thing, because the XO is intended for child use and you don't want adults to steal or sell it.

    8. Re:Can I flash the thing by DrXym · · Score: 1
      I got a Compaq for $350 a few weeks ago. 15" widescreen, NVidia accelerated graphics. Just over 5 pounds, feels sturdy in my hands. I use it to cart numbers between work/school/home as I work on my PhD. The XO weighs over 3 pounds and is worse in every techinical respect (processor, memory, hard disk space, drives, etc). Does 2 pounds really make or break portability to you?

      The whole point is that I don't want a hulking great laptop. It's not just the weight (which is lighter), but also the volume. I don't want something that requires a laptop case, or a power brick, or needs recharging all the time. I just want a very small, cheap laptop that lets me browse, check emails, write a document, play a few desktop games, run Skype and that's about it. At the moment I use an iPaq for holidays but the browsing is terrible and so is having tap on the keyboard to type.

      I see the OLPC as a cheap and rugged device that I can toss into a backpack or carry case. I can take it out and use it on the beach, or a coffee shop, or an aircraft clip tray. It has a keyboard, microphone, camera, speakers, mousepad in a very small form factor. The Asus Eee PC is also attractive for the same reason, although I doubt it will be as rugged but it benefits from looking a lot nicer.

    9. Re:Can I flash the thing by DrXym · · Score: 1

      I'd love an OLPC for myself. My kid can go to hell - I want one! He's two so I doubt he'll be too cut up about it. He can have mine after I've done with it.

    10. Re:Can I flash the thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we are all glad your son is still alive and kicking!

    11. Re:Can I flash the thing by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Is you Compaq designed to take all sorts of abuse, and be able to withstand water and dust and such?

      The durability and the low power consumption make this very interesting to me. If I can plug my phone into it via a USB port it could be a great connectivity solution while camping. (Festival-type campground camping in rural but not backwoods areas, where I can still get a cell signal, and be reachable in case of a work emergency. Backwoods camping is a different beast, if I'm going to the woods I am gone and don't expect to reach me.)

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    12. Re:Can I flash the thing by markov_chain · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's been said already, but let me also add:

      - the screen is readable in daylight
      - the battery lasts 24 hours in "ebook reading" mode (they power the framebuffer only, while suspending the main board)

      Is there another product on the market that does this? If you reply "paper" I will smack you with a fish! :)

      The other neat point is, it hasn't even been designed for first-world grownups to read on the beach.

      --
      Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
    13. Re:Can I flash the thing by jg · · Score: 1

      Yes, the anti-theft system will be disabled and you can install other things on it: both Fedora and Debian run on the system today: see the laptop.org wiki.

    14. Re:Can I flash the thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not designed to compete in the regular laptop market,

      This is designed not to compete in the regular laptop market,

      There. I've fixed it for you.

    15. Re:Can I flash the thing by abigsmurf · · Score: 1

      "* 6-24 hours(!!!) of run-time"

      Assuming you put it in black and white mode and spend a long time looking at completely static pages for minutes at a time

              * The XO's battery is good for 2000 charges and costs $10

      It's an NiMH battery. What's the big deal? They're heavy and slow to charge.

              * The XO has a 200 DPI daylight visible screen(!!!)

      In Black and white mode. In colour mode the screen's about the same quality as those of cheap portable DVD players (which the tech is based on)

              * Spill-proof keyboard

      Ever tried typing on one of those roll up keyboards? That's what typing on a membrane keyboard is like.

      I may be "afraid" like the article says but to me the OLPC is just too far from a regular PC to be useful. The version of Linux it uses isn't even compatible with other versions without rewriting. If you want to teach tech skills to kids you're far better off trying to emulate a 'real world' pc experience.

      And also, saying you can get a far better laptop for $400 isn't missing the point. We may be supposedly rich in the west but we're not so rich that a $200 forced donation hurts. All the aesthetic features that make it great for kids are all well and good but the main reason people in the west want it are because it's cheap.

    16. Re:Can I flash the thing by wild_berry · · Score: 1

      It's an NiMH battery

      TFA says "lithium ferro-phosphate".

      I may be "afraid" like the article says but to me the OLPC is just too far from a regular PC to be useful...If you want to teach tech skills to kids you're far better off trying to emulate a 'real world' pc experience.

      The project's about teaching learning skills in situations without much of a prospect for education. The device being used to do that has a full Linux subsystem and plays by POSIX-y rules. The Sugar interface stuff is written in Python, and isn't GNOME or KDE or XFCE or Enlightenment. But so what? Raise a generation of kids with the ability to learn for themselves (I allege Negroponte never wants to have to type "RTFM" again...) and they'll graduate to the sort of computing we find conventional. I think that's the plan.
    17. Re:Can I flash the thing by abigsmurf · · Score: 1

      http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Battery_Charging Not entirely clear but it says it has LiFePO4 as well as NiMH but there's no real info on the LiFePO4. Are they two seperate options or is the LiFePO4 treated as a buffer for a main NiMH cells?

    18. Re:Can I flash the thing by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 1
      SACAIGAP

      And yes, my two year old son spilled a cup of water on it two weeks ago. Still alive and kicking :)
      obVious: Well I, for one, am glad you didn't kill him.
    19. Re:Can I flash the thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, too, are missing the point of the laptop. The creator of the project, Nicholas Negroponte, said that "It's an education project, not a laptop project." (Source: http://www.laptop.org/vision/index.shtml) Getting a commercial version is the last thing on the list of things to do.

    20. Re:Can I flash the thing by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      "If you reply "paper" I will smack you with a fish! :)"

      But paper is more expansive.

  9. Photoshop? by wile_e_wonka · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Linux operating system doesnt run Microsoft Office, Photoshop or any other standard Mac or Windows programs. Wait--I got ripped off. My computer came with windows, but it didn't come standard with Microsoft Office or Photoshop!

    In all seriousness, though, the OLPC comes with OpenOffice and Gimp, which seem like fine alternatives to me for a bunch of African kids getting the laptop for free.
    1. Re:Photoshop? by paulproteus · · Score: 1

      No it does not come with OOo or The Gimp. It comes with custom software instead. See http://laptop.org/laptop/software/specs.shtml or read wiki.laptop.org.

      --
      |/usr/games/fortune
  10. Steal away an overlooked two-billion-person market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How can you "steal away" something that is being overlooked?

    It sounds like they may be defining a new marketspace that others will be free to join and compete in.

  11. THEY WILL LOOSE THE SALE... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...and let lose the dogs of war!

    1. Re:THEY WILL LOOSE THE SALE... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you mean the chihuahuas of rigged capitalism. (Outsourcing to cheaper countries is fine, but when the little guy does something better than you, time to bite the proverbial ankles)

    2. Re:THEY WILL LOOSE THE SALE... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  12. If OLPC was so good, it would be sold in US by iamacat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    After all, children do not stop needing cool, rugged laptops just because they have clean water and no malaria. Many US families are by no means reach and those pedal/crank/cord charging schemes would come very handy on scout trips. It's a bonus that the laptops will not run most viruses or "mature" 3D games. A modest market at somewhat higher price in US will lower costs through mass production as well as directly subsidize free - not even $100 - laptops for truly poor countries.

    The fact that the OLPCs are not offered in US toy stores even before pushing them abroad makes me suspect that they are seriously underpowered machines without much available software and are not as fun and cool as the project leaders would have us think.

    1. Re:If OLPC was so good, it would be sold in US by MBCook · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's flat out moronic. It's an amazing machine.

      So why not sell them in the US?

      • "It don't fit my hands?"
      • "Where do I put the CD?"
      • "Where is the start menu?"
      • "Why can't my kids play XBox on it?"

      These are ingenious little machines. It would be very smart to sell them to US consumers, but frankly I think the US computer market (something that includes me) tends to be... on average... far too ignorant to be able to buy these effectively. They will consider them all broken because they aren't "normal" computers.

      All this is ignoring the fact the whole point of this project is to help 3rd world people, not give Americans another way to IM their friends.

      They aren't underpowered, they have plenty of power. You don't NEED a dual CPU 2.x GHz laptop with 2 gigs of RAM to compute. This think would kick my Mac LC II around the block so bad it wouldn't be funny.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    2. Re:If OLPC was so good, it would be sold in US by DragonWriter · · Score: 4, Informative

      The fact that the OLPCs are not offered in US toy stores even before pushing them abroad makes me suspect that they are seriously underpowered machines without much available software and are not as fun and cool as the project leaders would have us think.


      They aren't designed as toys. They are designed as educational tools to be used in an environment where they interact with others with similar hardware, school servers, etc., and to support centralized distribution of software and content by the agency purchasing them.

      I also don't think you understand the marketing costs and risk associated with a mass retail marketing effort, particular of a product which is designed for the specific needs of a very different one than you are trying to market it to at retail.
    3. Re:If OLPC was so good, it would be sold in US by PaintyThePirate · · Score: 1

      Yet another person who completely missed the point. The point of the OLPC is to provide education in areas that have hundreds of children per teacher, and the classrooms are horribly lacking in the standard teaching tools we take for granted.

      American children already have well funded, well equipped, and well staffed (all relative to third world countries, mind you) school systems. Thus, the purpose of a computer in an American school is often less for the purpose of education in general than for education of the specifics of the computer. As in, learn how to write a Word document, use a spreadsheet, do research online, etc.

      The OLPC project on the other hand, is not about giving a child a laptop, its about giving a child a real education.

      Even so, the OLPC is going to be offered in the US, in a plan much like what you described. I, for one, am going to order one the first moment I can.

    4. Re:If OLPC was so good, it would be sold in US by MathFox · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'ld like to add that they need to produce millions of near identical computers to get the economy of scale to produce it at $150-200 cost. A run for the US toys stores would be too small. It is possible that some surplus will end up in regular "western" sales channels.

      --
      extern warranty;
      main()
      {
      (void)warranty;
      }
    5. Re:If OLPC was so good, it would be sold in US by Ilan+Volow · · Score: 1

      Perhaps. But it's also hard to rule out the possibility that the market in the US is stagnant, risk-averse, and unimaginative.

      If OLPC succeeds, maybe people in the US will start questioning why they can't bring computers to scouting trips, or why $3000 worth of engineering in a laptop didn't add another $3 of sturdier plastic that would have prevented it from shattering after a fall of only 3ft.

      --
      Ergonomica Auctorita Illico!
    6. Re:If OLPC was so good, it would be sold in US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      although their target consumers are outside of US, they can at least ,perhaps do a passive marketing here and still use the revenues to subsidize. I really dont understand why they cant sell OLPC for $250 or something like that in here and use that to subsidize the price elsewhere

    7. Re:If OLPC was so good, it would be sold in US by ChaosDiscord · · Score: 1

      The OLPC project's primary interest is helping children in the poorest parts of the world. I expect that providing US children with an inexpensive toy is pretty low on their list of goals.

    8. Re:If OLPC was so good, it would be sold in US by Deadplant · · Score: 1

      In fact you will be able to buy them in the US.
      Your purchase will also subsidize the free ones for poor countries.
      google for 'purchase olpc'

      I got to see one in person at the Ottawa Linux Symposium and I'm planning on buying one.

    9. Re:If OLPC was so good, it would be sold in US by poena.dare · · Score: 1

      Dung Bettle races and Throw the Dead Monkey beat Tertris every damn time, outside of the US, of course. However, where the OLPC will really shine is with that new 3rd World MMORPG, Rich Ignorant White American Pretend Time with Private Bathroom and No Flies!

    10. Re:If OLPC was so good, it would be sold in US by Deadplant · · Score: 1

      It will be for sale in the US for a limited time.
      Here is a better URL:

      http://www.xogiving.org/

    11. Re:If OLPC was so good, it would be sold in US by dar · · Score: 1

      If hammers were so good, we'd be using them to tighten bolts.

      --
      My other Slashdot ID is much lower.
    12. Re:If OLPC was so good, it would be sold in US by iamacat · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say anything if TFA didn't characterize OLPCs as "cool", "fun" and "good for learning". If that was true, it would be marketable in US Walmart to parents who can not spare more than $200/child for a computer or else are looking for one they wouldn't miss much if their children manage to destroy it despite the rugged design.

      If instead this is a gimmick that nobody would use if they can afford a real laptop, project leaders should just come out and say so honestly.

    13. Re:If OLPC was so good, it would be sold in US by fm6 · · Score: 1

      I also don't think you understand the marketing costs and risk associated with a mass retail marketing effort, particular of a product which is designed for the specific needs of a very different one than you are trying to market it to at retail.
      You make it sound more complicated than it is. In simple terms: nobody wants to spend a lot of money trying to market a cheap computer that isn't really designed for the U.S. market. Even if Americans wanted to buy it, there's no hope of making any money selling it.

      On the other hand, all these stories about what kids in the developing world are doing with these computers will probably create a demand for them in the industrialized world. Despite its limitations, the XO boasts as much computer power as most casual users need. Plus it's got some cool educational software that deserves attention even outside the OLPC world.
    14. Re:If OLPC was so good, it would be sold in US by DragonWriter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You make it sound more complicated than it is. In simple terms: nobody wants to spend a lot of money trying to market a cheap computer that isn't really designed for the U.S. market. Even if Americans wanted to buy it, there's no hope of making any money selling it.


      I don't think "the U.S. market" is the thing that it is not designed for that makes the big difference. Sure, sure, its environment-proof in many ways to meet needs of the developing world, but that kind of kid-proofing isn't far from the needs of young users in the U.S.

      What it isn't designed for that really makes a difference is the individual purchaser market, in the US or elsewhere. Most of the key features of interest to end-users rely on either (a) having regular access to an upstream content supplier, or (b) having lots of other people in your peer group that have a compatible system.

    15. Re:If OLPC was so good, it would be sold in US by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say anything if TFA didn't characterize OLPCs as "cool", "fun" and "good for learning". If that was true, it would be marketable in US Walmart to parents who can not spare more than $200/child for a computer


      Its "cool", "fun", and "good for learning", in the context for which it was designed: that is, in an environment where, for the student, everyone in their peer group also has them, and they are supported by a national infrastructure that includes a content distribution system that includes school servers, etc., providing content and services designed around the XO.

      (It may be somewhat "cool", "fun", and "good for learning" individually, outside of that context, but not enough to justify the ~$175 mass-purchase cost of the bare machine except to a very small market -- one that may be overrepresented on /. -- not to mention the higher cost that would be necessary to support in-store retail sales, customer support, etc., even without providing any subsidy back to the OLPC project. If it was sold at Wal*Mart, it wouldn't be under $200 even before any subsidy.)
    16. Re:If OLPC was so good, it would be sold in US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prediction: Two days after the XO ships in the two for one sale next month, they will be available in the US on eBay.

      They WILL be sold in the US.

    17. Re:If OLPC was so good, it would be sold in US by wpg3 · · Score: 1

      I posted the above thing about selling them on eBay (and messed up my password so I turned into Anonymous Coward). What I meant was that people who do the two for one and get one in the US will decide they don't know what to do with it and sell it here. I did not mean to imply that there would be any corruption about it in the target countries (as someone else here implied). I plan to do it myself and I actually don't know if my fingers are small enough to type on the thing. And I don't have any children. So I might sell mine, if I can keep it away from my nieces and nephews.

    18. Re:If OLPC was so good, it would be sold in US by localman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Having had success installing late 80's era black and white Macintosh computers in South Africa, I'm going to say that you don't understand the issue. The needs are very different there and here. A rugged underpowered machine is much preferable to anything you can buy in the stores.

      Cheers.

    19. Re:If OLPC was so good, it would be sold in US by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The fact that the OLPCs are not offered in US toy stores even before pushing them abroad makes me suspect that they are seriously underpowered machines

      The XO is not a toy, it's an educational tool. I don't see math textbooks in U.S. toy stores.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    20. Re:If OLPC was so good, it would be sold in US by drix · · Score: 1

      The reason they aren't sold in the US is because it would be competing with a billion other distractions that are available to kids here. And it would lose, and then would be called a failure. The point of this machine is to offer children something challenging and constructive to do with their time in places where there is literally no other form of intellectual stimulation. No books, no music, no newspapers, not even TV. Assuming they're not sewing soccer balls for Adidas, most kids in the third world do a lot of staring into space and goofing off with friends. This laptop is a way to harness all that youthful energy towards an enriching end. Not so much of a problem if you live in the first world, but a real waste of potential elsewhere.

      --

      I think there is a world market for maybe five personal web logs.
    21. Re:If OLPC was so good, it would be sold in US by falconwolf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'ld like to add that they need to produce millions of near identical computers to get the economy of scale to produce it at $150-200 cost.

      I'll add that it would help if the laptops were produced in the country if not the region that buys them. One nation mentioned as buying or having an interest in buying the XO is Brazil. If OLPC were to open a factory in Brazil to build them n ot only would it benefit education in Brazil but it would create jobs there too. They might not last long but the skills gained by the workers can be used somewhere else, a group of workers could start a business building computers and selling them. Others can write software.

      Falcon
    22. Re:If OLPC was so good, it would be sold in US by fm6 · · Score: 1

      You know, I think you're right. I take it all back. Still, I do hope that the XO will have some influence on consumer computing in the developed world. I'd especially like to see more systems that aren't so obscenely feature bloated.

    23. Re:If OLPC was so good, it would be sold in US by mysticgoat · · Score: 1

      What it isn't designed for that really makes a difference is the individual purchaser market, in the US or elsewhere.

      True enough, but the statement really needs to be generalized:

      XO isn't designed for sale, in any way. There is nothing proprietary about it. The software is all FOSS, and the hardware is basically patent-free. Under these conditions, there is no way for a would-be marketer to assure that his margins would be sufficient to recover his start-up costs.

      The XO was designed through a very interesting process of contributed intellectual labor. There is literally no way to capitalize on that.

      Just think, though. The XO will put the Gutenberg library of books into the hands of students for a fraction of the cost of buying and shipping the hardcopies of these classics.

    24. Re:If OLPC was so good, it would be sold in US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be very smart to sell them to US consumers, but frankly I think the US computer market (something that includes me) tends to be... on average... far too ignorant to be able to buy these effectively.
      But people in 3rd world countries are.. less ignorant on average!?

      All this is ignoring the fact the whole point of this project is to help 3rd world people, not give Americans another way to IM their friends.
      Sales in the U.S. could make enough money to reduce the cost to said 3rd world people. The GP's point, however, is that even the U.S. has poor people.
    25. Re:If OLPC was so good, it would be sold in US by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      The XO was designed through a very interesting process of contributed intellectual labor. There is literally no way to capitalize on that.



      I'm not sure that's really true. As corporations supplying enterprise-oriented Linux (and other OSS products) have demonstrated, its quite possible to capitalize on "contributed intellectual labor" by (1) knowing the product well, and (2) using that knowledge to provide first-class services and support. You supply the product itself as a way to build the initial relationship that allows you to sell the services and support that make the product useful to the customer. I wouldn't be surprised if some clever service provide found a way to do that with a system incorporating technology largely derived from the OLPC.

    26. Re:If OLPC was so good, it would be sold in US by raddan · · Score: 1

      My 286 when I was in grade school wasn't designed as a toy, either. But it ended up functioning that way, for me. And it definitely influenced my career path. And grades. I was handing in typed homework (we had a daisywheel printer-- the ultimate!) in grade school because I could-- I wanted an excuse to play with the computer-- and my teachers held this work up as a shining example for others to follow. I can assure you that the content was not very good, but it did look nice.

      I also discovered that your newspaper route customers tended to pay a bit more promptly if you tucked a printed bill into their paper, instead of reading the amount off out of your grubby pencil ledger. There was always that one guy who insisted that the slightest smear was actually a PAID mark. Had to learn Lotus 1-2-3 for that trick.

    27. Re:If OLPC was so good, it would be sold in US by renoX · · Score: 1

      Well, 'it doesn't fit my hand' seems to me a very valid criticism for adults, the other are just a knowledge issue.

      So "It's an amazing machine." *for children*, the keyboard problem will limit very much the uptake for adults.

    28. Re:If OLPC was so good, it would be sold in US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > They aren't designed as toys.

      Of course not. If they were designed as toys, they'd be painted with leaded paint in China.

  13. Re:first tits! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    What does this have to do with tits/ boobs, exactly?

  14. A child?? I must have turn the logo the wrong way by DigitalReverend · · Score: 5, Funny

    FTFA: "The laptop is now called the XO, because if you turn the logo 90 degrees, it looks like a child."

    90 degrees in which direction? If you turn it the other way it looks like a skull and crossbones.

    --
    I read Slashdot for the headlines, because the headlines, unlike the articles, are usually original and never duplicated
  15. Going against slashdot trend by valkabo · · Score: 0

    I for one think this thing is amazing! You have to relize that some places getting these laptops may have almost no other computer capabilities. These things may be it, along with one or two old pc's at school. This could really change a lot

  16. No food? No problem! by serginho · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    "Critics fear that the poorest countries need food, malaria protection and clean water far more than computers. But the XO deserves to overcome those fears."

    What a great argument. Of course people in poor countries don't need medicine, clean water and food. They have other priorities, such as laptop computer. And of course they'll just work it all out with these new wonders of technology! It's like the iPhone, only for barefoot, illiterate, sick, starving people.

    Maybe Pogue should care to see first-hand what misery is really like before making these outrageous statements from the comfort of his suburban home.

    1. Re:No food? No problem! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you need to get over your Hollywood and National Geographic inspired image of Africa. Almost all the countries and communities in Africa might be devastatingly poor by your standards (unless you've grown up in rural Mississippi), but food and water and basic medical care are actually available to many million of children in Africa and Asia. Prospects for a competitive education and sustainable employment, on the other hand, are much less common. There's an incredibly large niche for the XO. By all accounts an XO is likely cheaper than trying to equip schools with paper books; that alone is as a compelling argument as any.

      Also, more money and donations don't always work. You could increase the dollars going to the Sudanese refugees by many billions and not change things in the slightest. Of course, neither would the XO help them. But the point is that all the worlds problems can't be solved by rich people donating the detritus of their wealth to the starving, lamentable masses.

    2. Re:No food? No problem! by cduffy · · Score: 1

      It's like the iPhone, only for barefoot, illiterate, sick, starving people.
      Because barefoot, illiterate, sick, starving people should never be given anything that might make them less illiterate (and thus, eventually, less barefoot, sick and starving).

      The XO is a way for teachers to stay in touch with illiterate parents. The XO is textbooks that won't be burnt for heat. The XO is exposure to the same kind of ability to learn valuable skills that first-world children have been enjoying for decades. The XO is, in short, a chance at a better future.
    3. Re:No food? No problem! by mangu · · Score: 1
      What is your fear, exactly? That poor people will learn to read and write and no longer need to work for you as gardeners and housekeepers?


      Maybe *you* should leave your air-conditioned apartment in Leblon or Morumbi and learn first-hand what poor people really need.

    4. Re:No food? No problem! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course people in poor countries don't need medicine, clean water and food.
      Nice troll... You'd be in a good position to complain if your tax dollars were being used to buy the laptops. But they are not. The laptops are bought largely with the taxes of the people using them, apart from a little donated by people who think this is a good idea. Who are you to tell them any different?
    5. Re:No food? No problem! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should take your head out of your ass as realize that not all third world countries are barren hellholes devoid of food, water, shelter ad clothing, overpopulated with starving, barefoot people. That's not who the XO is targeted at, think more along the lines of Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, eastern Europe, who are by all means industrialized, and have infrastructure, but just aren't up to par with first world stardards.

      Obviously an XO is pretty useless for a child in Africa who has no drinking water, but I guarantee you the average child in Brazil or Mexico would appreciate one of these.

      Help build physical infrastructure in countries lacking it, obviously, but don't argue that countries which are industrialized and have infrastructure (but are just not quite up to first world standards) should get help with their technological infrastructure because such a project isn't suited for different countries, with different problems, to whom this project isn't even targeted at. There are many levels of poor, just because a country isn't too poor to lack the infrastructure necessary to have consistent food, water ad shelter, doesn't mean it isn't too poor to have reasonably accessible hardware, or that it wouldn't be welcomed.

    6. Re:No food? No problem! by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      I've seen a lot of arguments to this effect, and I have yet to be convinced that this program will make any sort of real difference in people's lives. I certainly know that if I suddenly found myself short on money, and forced to eke out a meager existence, I wouldn't give a computer a moment's thought, except that maybe I could sell it to someone, and buy food with it. A desire to help people in need is extremely admirable, but I think the methodology is nothing short of idiotic and useless, and will not produce any real results.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    7. Re:No food? No problem! by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1
      Oh, yes, because a person thinking that the project won't accomplish anything useful MUST be hell-bent on keeping the poor people in their place.

      </dripping sarcasm>

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    8. Re:No food? No problem! by Watson+Ladd · · Score: 1

      Ever hear of multitasking? You can feed starving people while giving them an education.

      --
      Inventions have long since reached their limit, and I see no hope for further development.-- Frontinus, 1st cent. AD
    9. Re:No food? No problem! by cduffy · · Score: 1

      I certainly know that if I suddenly found myself short on money, and forced to eke out a meager existence, I wouldn't give a computer a moment's thought
      Would you give your childrens' education a moment's thought? Might you consider that you would want them to eventually have a better life than you yourself do? Or are you asserting that poverty inherently removes all ambition and interest in the long-term best interests of one's children?

      Look -- I'm familiar with Maslow's hierarchy of needs, but to effectively claim that anyone who's economically worse off than you are is somehow incapable of thinking about their family's long-term best interests is astoundingly condescending.
    10. Re:No food? No problem! by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      I never claimed such a thing, you're putting words in my mouth. I claim that if your present-day needs fill enough of your time, future needs are rendered rather irrelevant, unless you're an exceptionally forward-thinking individual. It doesn't matter, after all, if your children get a good education if they starve.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    11. Re:No food? No problem! by cduffy · · Score: 0

      That these laptops are not built or distributed as toys; they are designed, built, programmed and distributed as educational tools, optionally configured to render themselves useless should they repeatedly fail to show up at school. A top-of-the-line Dell given to a family in poverty may well be useless to them except for its cash value -- but the XO is an entirely different beast.

      As for your claim that only an "exceptionally forward-thinking individual" would be concerned about their children's future if they're having a hard time day-to-day -- I reject that. For one, those areas able to afford $100 per child for an educational tool aren't those where a the populace at large is literally barefoot and starving. There are quite a lot of places (like Accra was 8 or so years ago) where there are jobs (my friend's mother owned a textile factory, her father was a banker, and their household employed a significant amount of hired help) but electricity is sporadic and quality of education is sporadic for those without money. Computers (and parts for them) were at that time difficult to come by -- meaning that individuals' opportunity to get into tech was limited to those who could afford it.

      Don't think barefoot children living in huts and people who are literally running a high risk of dying of starvation. Think wood-frame houses and dead-end jobs. This is an environment where people can afford to think about their future -- but where the resources to do something about it are hard to come by. And this is an environment where the XO can do a tremendous amount of good.

    12. Re:No food? No problem! by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Oh, yes, because a person thinking that the project won't accomplish anything useful MUST be hell-bent on keeping the poor people in their place.

      Then give a rational reason why you would think that. It's difficult to think of any other than callousness or arrogance. Of course it will achieve some things. Will it save the world, no? But claiming it will achieve NOTHING is beyond absurd and implies you have an ulterior motive.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  17. The scams I understand. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    And porn is a bad thing because...?

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:The scams I understand. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because a 2000-year-old book says that sexual pleasure is wrong.

    2. Re:The scams I understand. by ThosLives · · Score: 1

      This is either a pretty good troll, or one extremely misinformed person.

      The book to which this AC is referring says no such thing. In fact, it says quite the opposite. (It just says that, handled irresponsibly, there are not-so-pleasant consequences. Which shouldn't be surprising, since handling anything irresponsibly - even low-cost computers - typically has not-so-pleasant consequences). After all, isn't one of the big controversies over OLPC / XO the "fear" that the technology will be used irresponsibly?

      But, of course, this is Slashdot, where Misinformation and Assumptions Rule.

      --
      "There are a dozen opinions on a matter until you know the truth. Then there is only one." - CS Lewis (paraprhase)
    3. Re:The scams I understand. by ozmanjusri · · Score: 2, Interesting
      After all, isn't one of the big controversies over OLPC / XO the "fear" that the technology will be used irresponsibly?

      No, that's just a bunch of shills/trolls who realise this thing's good enough to make people in the developed world wonder why they're paying so much for the bloated, virus-infested crap they're saddled with.

      When you see whining on the scale of the posts here, about a project with so many clear benefits, scrape a bit deeper and you'll see the usual greed and self-interest driving them.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  18. tradeoffs by LwPhD · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Despite some of my reservations (some of them in common with Pogue) I really hope that this "little laptop that could" becomes widely adopted. If it is, it will be game changing on so many levels. It is so much more than a teaching tool. Not only will it redefine who gets to participate in the market of ideas, it will change the pricing for laptop prices across the board. Perhaps even quicken the convergence between cell phones, PDAs, laptops, and other media centers. The little device is just wicked cool.

    However, there are some darker sides to it. Online addiction is epidemic in China. Also, if the OLPC is actually successful, some suggest that their owners would man a CAPTCHA solving army.

    In the end, I think these risks are worth the benefits. And wide adoption is the least of the project's worries. It seems as if adoption is taking off a little too slowly.

    1. Re:tradeoffs by jmdc · · Score: 1

      ...some suggest that their owners would man a CAPTCHA solving army. Captchas could be changed so that in order to pass, you have to demonstrate ability to read in addition to just matching symbols. This would prevent illiterate people from copy-pasting and then matching shapes. I think that literate people with basic internet skills would be able to do more with their lives than solve captchas. I don't think spammers can pay them enough. This is without any facts, figures or research, but hey ... this is slashdot.
    2. Re:tradeoffs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, there are some darker sides to it. Online addiction is epidemic in China. Also, if the OLPC is actually successful, some suggest that their owners would man a CAPTCHA solving army .
      Your post is overall good, and I agree that the laptops will cause some problems where they are deployed. However I'm not so sure about that "online addiction is epidemic in China" statement. I'm not aware of reputable research coming to that conclusion (correct me if I'm wrong)--fear-mongering news reports don't count... I suspect online addiction is epidemic in China in much the same way that the media reports that pot smoking is epidemic in North America.
    3. Re:tradeoffs by kidcharles · · Score: 1

      Captchas could be changed so that in order to pass, you have to demonstrate ability to read in addition to just matching symbols. Except that the XO is designed to combat illiteracy! Oh noes!
      --
      Ceci n'est pas une sig.
    4. Re:tradeoffs by jmdc · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that the worry is that people won't use them for education. Instead, they will just copy and paste spam into a blog, and then match symbols. Making captchas that require literacy would prevent illiterate captcha solvers. I don't think its necessary to worry about literate captcha solvers because if someone can read and use a computer, that's a huge skill in the developing world. It puts them ahead, and they can do something more profitable than solve captchas. That's completely a guess pulled out of my ass, but it seems reasonable to me given that spam only works because of the ridiculous low cost.

    5. Re:tradeoffs by grcumb · · Score: 1

      Despite some of my reservations (some of them in common with Pogue) I really hope that this "little laptop that could" becomes widely adopted. If it is, it will be game changing on so many levels. It is so much more than a teaching tool. Not only will it redefine who gets to participate in the market of ideas, it will change the pricing for laptop prices across the board. Perhaps even quicken the convergence between cell phones, PDAs, laptops, and other media centers. The little device is just wicked cool.

      I've been using one for over a month to provide demonstrations of its capabilities in a Least Developed Country in the South Pacific, and I can guarantee you that your comments are spot on. In 15 years of work, some of it in the most remote places in the world, I've never seen any hardware that succeeds as well as this one. The design goals are clear and they've been achieved.

      The proof of the pudding is in the tasting, as they say, and the one thing that convinces me that the XO is the real thing is the fact that everyone who sees it immediately asks, "How can I get one for my child?"

      These are important people, decision-makers who have risen from a simple existence in the village to positions of responsibility. They're typically university-educated, but without exception they come from villages with no power or running water, with limited accessibility. They all know what computers are for, concretely and potentially, and they know, more intimately than you or I ever could, just what life is like in the places the XO is destined to go. Nobody, in my opinion, is better qualified to judge the appropriateness of the design.

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
  19. Less is More? by rueger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A rather thin article to be sure, but this machine does offer something appealing - less of everything.

    More and more, after years of Windows, then a Mac, then dabbling with various Linux distros, I find myself questioning just how much of the junk on my computers is essential or even useful.

    Less moving parts, simpler and fewer applications, and limited capabilities, all sound like positives, not negatives, if only because it could slow the endless stream of updates and fixes, each of which seems to introduce other problems.

    I can see an OLPC machine as really good daily machine for e-mail, browsing, and some everyday tasks like word processing, at least with a bigger hard drive. With the option of maintaining a desktop PC, even a generation older, to handle the heavy lifting of Adobe and similar tools, I could probably get by nicely with this little unit.

    1. Re:Less is More? by kevin.fowler · · Score: 1

      With an external hard drive at your desk (next to your window-mounted solar panel), some manner of file share on your home network, or even a large thumbdrive, you might not even need a conventional-sized hard drive.

      --
      Bury me in mashed potatoes.
    2. Re:Less is More? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can see an OLPC machine as really good daily machine for e-mail, browsing, and some everyday tasks like word processing, at least with a bigger hard drive.

      Ummm... Why do you think a bigger hard drive would be required for the three things you mentioned? Email - running low on space, delete more of it, or transfer it somewhere else. Browsing - you did not mention downloading and keeping, so browsing will only take what you give it, some will obey the max cache size, while others will keep 0byte files laying around. Word Processing - How many word processing documents can fit into an 800MB area? Unless the WP program adds a lot of cruft to each document, those documents should not be that big at all.

      Yes, I am assuming non-corporate use. I am assuming under twenty page WP documents to be standard. I am using my experiencing of using Damn Small Linux on a 256MB RAM machine with no hard drive as a base. Plus, my memories of Win3.1 on my 280MB hard drive with 8MB of RAM. Yes, many out there can give examples of less resources to do more.

    3. Re:Less is More? by rueger · · Score: 1

      two words: photos and music

    4. Re:Less is More? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      two words: photos and music

      I know I am in the minority on this one, but I do not put music on my computer. I have not purchased an album in over seven years. I have not downloaded anything except a few MP3's, like the one available on purepwnage.com. I am not a music fan, so that one did not apply to me.

      I used to be a photographer. I am back to doing darkroom work. I do not like editing images on the computer. I prefer the tranquility of an amber light. I will still edit a photo here or there, but for quite a bit of what is needed, I can use my copy of Photostyler that I received back in '95. Yes, I am in the minority on this one also, so that one did not apply to me. Besides, if I edited images on the computer, I would never get out of this chair. The darkroom gives me some exercise, very little, but some.

      Everyone is different, believe me, I know this. However, what was listed was simple email, web browsing and some word processing. I know many people who never touch a photo after they have taken it, no matter how large it is in resolution and size. To each their own, but for email, web browsing and word processing, 256MB of RAM and a years old processor is fine. Even less for some.

  20. Re:first tits! by iamacat · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yes, in fact an ideal "change the world" computer should come with a complete schematics. Local tech industry can then get off the ground by manufacturing clones costing way less than $100 and eventually making more powerful versions for adults and even businesses.

  21. It's a matter of perspective, I guess by g1zmo · · Score: 1

    FTFA:

    The laptop is now called the XO, because if you turn the logo 90 degrees, it looks like a child.

    It looks more like the symbol on poison labels and pirate ships, if you ask me.

    --
    I have found there are just two ways to go.
    It all comes down to livin' fast or dyin' slow.
    -REK, Jr.
    1. Re:It's a matter of perspective, I guess by CortoMaltese · · Score: 1

      FTFA:

      The laptop is now called the XO, because if you turn the logo 90 degrees, it looks like a child.

      It looks more like the symbol on poison labels and pirate ships, if you ask me.

      And if you ask me, I'm thinking that if you turn XO 90 degrees, you'll be spilling your fine extra old cognac, which really makes me weep.
  22. Re:A child?? I must have turn the logo the wrong w by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    90 degrees counterclockwise.

    Head.
    Arms.
    Legs.

  23. Terminal + ssh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All I need is a terminal + ssh and vi(m).

    So teh question beckons!!!

  24. It's called the "Web", guys by Turing+Machine · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Critics fear that the poorest countries need food, malaria protection and clean water far more than computers.

    'Cause there's no way that you could possibly use one of these things to learn about sustainable agriculture, malaria prevention, or safe drinking water, right?

    1. Re:It's called the "Web", guys by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      My god .... somebody on Slashdot GETS it. My brain is going to explode.

    2. Re:It's called the "Web", guys by ThosLives · · Score: 1

      Yes, you could theoretically use that to learn about those things. But computers don't bring in resources that aren't currently in a geographic location. Those are protected by people with guns. That's what people often forget: education is great and all, but without hard physical resources that education is useless.

      I'm all for education, but these people need education and resources. In fact, most people will tell you that having more resources makes it simpler to learn, because less time is spent trying to survive and is therefore available to learn. The current state of many "poor" countries is that there is an immediate tradeoff between "hrm, should I study for an hour or spend an hour protecting the few vegetable plants I have from rodents or theives?"

      I think that there is a necessary balance between education and the resources to mobilize that education. Education itself doesn't do anything unless it somehow brings in resources that aren't available in these areas.

      So, great - these folks will have an education program. Now how do we get them raw materials and factories to construct an infrastructure without having the local warlords or whomever steal or destroy them and avoid the rest of the international community saying "hey quit being a bully state!"?

      Remember, again, that most world problems today aren't technical, but political.

      --
      "There are a dozen opinions on a matter until you know the truth. Then there is only one." - CS Lewis (paraprhase)
    3. Re:It's called the "Web", guys by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      education is great and all, but without hard physical resources that education is useless.

      And without education, hard physical resources are equally useless. Did it occur to you that maybe *both* are a good thing? That there could be multiple *complimentary* efforts?

    4. Re:It's called the "Web", guys by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      This project isn't about getting people who aren't learning into the classroom it's about providing a resource to 3rd world classrooms.

      You seem to be under the assumption that the XO will be a substitute for classroom teaching which it's not. It's place is as a tool to be used in the classroom. So guarding the vegetable plants as you put it is not a situation that would come up.

      The pay-off that the XO is to provide would be to raise the standard of education, once that is done the next generation would have the knowledge sufficient to improve their lives and the lives of the people around them.

    5. Re:It's called the "Web", guys by Jeremi · · Score: 1
      So, great - these folks will have an education program. Now how do we get them raw materials and factories to construct an infrastructure without having the local warlords or whomever steal or destroy them and avoid the rest of the international community saying "hey quit being a bully state!"?


      The simple answer is that you don't: the XO laptop is not going to cure all of the world's ills by itself. Instead, you accept that the XO is not going to work in all countries, and market it only to the countries where it seems likely that it can help.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    6. Re:It's called the "Web", guys by FailedTheTuringTest · · Score: 1

      Remember, again, that most world problems today aren't technical, but political.

      In your last sentence, you got it, without even realising it! Yes, most world problems are political. Politics is hugely about information and communication, which is exactly what the XO delivers. The kids that get these will grow up in a world of information and communication. They'll be the bloggers and pundits of the new age, on a mobile-and-mesh network that will be difficult for frightened authorities to control. And the kids will think differently from their peers and from the previous generation. They will grow up in a world of interactive, creative problem-solving. They'll expect instant access to information, and to share their ideas and think critically. They'll be used to tinkering with systems to make them work better, and they'll be unafraid to experiment. The lessons they learn tinkering with software systems will transfer to political systems and to every other kind of system, and they will make change. If enough XOs get out into the world, they could be incredibly transformative.

    7. Re:It's called the "Web", guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      without having the local warlords or whomever steal or destroy them

      You can learn about strategy, tactics, and improvised weapons manufacture on the net as well.

      You can also use the net to get the story of your oppression in the international public eye so you can acquire allies and produce international pressure (up to and including direct military intervention).

      Your point?

    8. Re:It's called the "Web", guys by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Yes, you could theoretically use that to learn about those things. But computers don't bring in resources that aren't currently in a geographic location. Those are protected by people with guns. That's what people often forget: education is great and all, but without hard physical resources that education is useless.


      Most of the developing world has resources of some kind, and they tend not be used effectively. Lack of education is one reason for that (government failures are another, but since these are being sold to national ministries of education, they aren't going to places where (a) the government doesn't care, or (b) no effective government exists and local warlords control everything.)

      I'm all for education, but these people need education and resources.


      Yeah, they do. No one is suggesting that OLPC is the only thing the developing world needs or can benefit from.

      Its possible for the developed world to do more than one thing at a time.

      The current state of many "poor" countries is that there is an immediate tradeoff between "hrm, should I study for an hour or spend an hour protecting the few vegetable plants I have from rodents or theives?"


      That's true largely of the poorest of poor countries, which aren't really the primary target of the OLPC project (though some countries in that tier may get XOs because somewhat more developed countries are buying it for them, as Libya has discussed doing for Rwanda.)

      Now how do we get them raw materials and factories


      Er, the raw materials used in the developed world often come from the developing world.

      Indeed, part of the reason they need better education is so that they can develop some kind of economic base besides agriculture and extractive industries. And the main problem with factories and other industries is the lack of local skills to mix with the resources to attract investment capital.

      Education addresses that directly. Other things help to, e.g., microcredit programs have been shown to be a big boon to economic development and provide opportunities to develop business skills to tackle bigger challenges, so can be another key in skill development.

      Remember, again, that most world problems today aren't technical, but political.


      Mass education and access to information is a key to addressing political problems as well as technical problems.
  25. It's gotta be better by postbigbang · · Score: 1

    than my Osborne I.

    Oh- wait, Adam Osborne was from Thailand.....

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  26. Re:first tits! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's your biggest fear? Keep in mind that the people receiving these can barely read in most cases. Providing them with powerful learning tools is much more important.

    Honestly, sometimes I think people are so militant in the open source/non-proprietary movement that they fail to see the good that the market can sometimes produce.

  27. Re:first tits! by jdigriz · · Score: 3, Funny

    Nah, an ideal "change the world" computer should come with self-replicating nanoassemblers so it can then produce more copies of itself from garbage as well as provide food, shelter, electricity generation and anything else the user might need.

  28. $12 PV panel? by Two99Point80 · · Score: 1

    Sounds too good to be true. Hope I'm wrong...

    1. Re:$12 PV panel? by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      > Sounds too good to be true. Hope I'm wrong...

      I can show you (and so can Google) internet retailers selling 1W panels for $10-12 that are about 1/2sq ft. Buy in bulk and leave out a profit and ya, you can buy 2W (the stated power needed to run an OLPC) for $12.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
  29. yeah by everphilski · · Score: 2, Interesting

    virtually all ham radios, even the new ones with the tiny pitch SMT soldered components, come with schematics. I'm on a mailing list for the Yaesu FT-817and people have broken it open to swap out resistors to improve performance. Ham radio operators complain that nowadays we are just 'appliance operators': computer users haven't been experimentalists/hobbyists for the most part for 20+ years, although a few still do tinker. I wonder if it will come full circle someday and computers will be more of a hobbyist build, with schematics and more possibilities.

    1. Re:yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I wonder if it will come full circle someday and computers will be more of a hobbyist build, with schematics and more possibilities.
      Perhaps when printed circuits are truely printable circuits. If the technology for using a printer to print out operational circuit "boards" complete with all the ICs, resistors, capactitors etc becomes advanced and inexpensive enough then how many geeks will be able to resist? Especially if the design software is OSS. Greatest hindrances possible would be patent law and printer jambs.
    2. Re:yeah by iamacat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So sounds like you are only waiting for cheaper and more powerful FPGAs? I guess the programming equipment doesn't have to be that cheap - an online service that mails you ones programmed to your schematics would do.

    3. Re:yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I was referring to was something that would be closer to a replicator.

    4. Re:yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have a look at RepRap.

      Still at the baby steps stage, but there's been an immense amount of progress in recent months.

      (rapid prototyping has been around for a while, of course... what's different about this is the ability to do it on the cheap)

    5. Re:yeah by jack455 · · Score: 1

      virtually all ham radios, even the new ones with the tiny pitch SMT soldered components, come with schematics. I'm on a mailing list for the Yaesu FT-817and people have broken it open to swap out resistors to improve performance. Ham radio operators complain that nowadays we are just 'appliance operators': computer users haven't been experimentalists/hobbyists for the most part for 20+ years, although a few still do tinker. I wonder if it will come full circle someday and computers will be more of a hobbyist build, with schematics and more possibilities. Giving malnourished children a cheap laptop seems strange, but I'm all for it. Give them at least a chance to participate. Others are already trying too feed them.

      But your ham radio idea, while interesting, would end up doing neither.
      (Radio is obselete technology, and solder is distinctly non-edible.
    6. Re:yeah by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Actually these laptops are being sold to the corrupt third world goverments who caused them to be malnourished in the first place. But I'm sure they'll do the honest thing and hand them out to the starving millions for free.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  30. Re:A child?? I must have turn the logo the wrong w by MagicM · · Score: 2, Informative

    The skull and crossbones is the child. See the website.

  31. Re:first tits! by CheeseTroll · · Score: 3, Informative

    How is any local tech industry going to manufacture clones for less? As Negroponte has pointed out, assembly costs for the XO are only ~$1 per machine. They'd need to import all the individual components, anyway.

    --
    A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
  32. It doesn't matter by superbrose · · Score: 1

    If the dollar continues its current trend then it will be even more affordable, maybe the project will be renamed to NLPC!

  33. looks like a child? by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    The laptop is now called the XO, because if you turn the logo 90 degrees, it looks like a child. The fuck? Where are they handing these things out, Love Canal?
    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  34. Re:A child?? I must have turn the logo the wrong w by everphilski · · Score: 1

    And if you turn it the other way, it looks like an O with an X on its head.

    Or maybe John Madden was trying out as spokesman and had too much fun with the telestrator :)

  35. What "need" does this fulfill? by goldspider · · Score: 1

    I'm still trying to figure out what social ill these things are supposed to cure. I won't perpetuate the popular stereotype of straw huts and rampant starvation and disease, but I don't buy into this assumption that African progress is being hindered by a lack of cheap computers, of all things.

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    1. Re:What "need" does this fulfill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not. It's a money-making enterprise and nothing more, wrapped in a faux-philanthropic advertising package. I'm so sick of hearing about this crap $100 laptop that will retail for $200 or more (so sayeth Negroponte himself) and how it's going to change the world. What's worse are the /. evangelists who defend the concept in the face of any criticism whatsoever, while the product has yet to be seen (is this the first review? I haven't seen any others yet).

    2. Re:What "need" does this fulfill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      assumption that African progress is being hindered by a lack of cheap computers, of all things. If you are interested, look at http://wiki.laptop.org/.
      The motto is It's an education project, not a laptop project., meaning it's suppossed to cure the lack of education, not the lack of computers.
      And education IS an important aspect of progress.
    3. Re:What "need" does this fulfill? by zzatz · · Score: 1

      Forget that the XO is a computer. Think of it as a book. A library of books, easily updated.

      There will still be some people arguing that teaching people how to read diverts funds away from giving them food.

      Calling the XO a laptop was a huge mistake. It's an embedded system, not a replacement for MacBooks and Dells.

    4. Re:What "need" does this fulfill? by Jeremi · · Score: 1
      I'm still trying to figure out what social ill these things are supposed to cure. I won't perpetuate the popular stereotype of straw huts and rampant starvation and disease, but I don't buy into this assumption that African progress is being hindered by a lack of cheap computers, of all things.


      What makes you assume these laptops are all going to Africa? There are many other parts of the world that could use a cheap laptop as well, or perhaps better, than Africa.


      Anyway, to answer your question: the "need" for cheap/free access to information for educational purposes.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    5. Re:What "need" does this fulfill? by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      > I'm still trying to figure out what social ill these things are supposed to cure.

      On the one hand I have to agree with ya, the primary problem in Africa is a lack of understanding and respect for basic[1] human rights. But it is a lot harder to keep an educated population in the sort of abject despotism bordering on slavery most of Africa lives under. The first thing is to let those poor blokes understand that a) their life doesn't HAVE to suck and b) what sort of changes would actually improve their lot. So to the extent handing out these machines might be a backdoor way of bringing about an educated population that would throw off the yoke of the totatarians and socialists that have been running things over there since Europe lost the will to maintain their colonial interests, it just might be worth it.

      [1] In roughly the order of importance for raising their standard of living:

      1. Why the Rule of Law is better than the Rule of Men, and is the basis for all of the others.

      2. Property Rights (or why Socialism is the polar opposite of liberty)

      3. Free Markets (or why well meaning idiots who think government can run an economy better should be ignored)

      4. Individual Liberty (Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness)

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    6. Re:What "need" does this fulfill? by grcumb · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I won't perpetuate the popular stereotype of straw huts and rampant starvation and disease, but I don't buy into this assumption that African progress is being hindered by a lack of cheap computers, of all things.

      I believe it was Duke Ellington who, when asked what Jazz is, famously said, "Man, if you gotta ask, you ain't never gonna know."

      (And while we're at it: You are aware that the majority of the developing world is not in Africa, I hope?)

      If you don't get why improved access to information is a fundamental prerequisite for development, then the XO will always look like wings on a fish. If, however, you can accept the premise that inadequate communications is one of the biggest stumbling blocks we face when trying to perform any kind of development work, then you will quickly see why people are so excited about this project.

      I met a young doctor yesterday whose initial reaction was almost exactly the same as yours. She's dedicated to health education in the developing world, and she's very good at what she does. When she first read about the work we've been doing in the South Pacific, she immediately scoffed and insisted that we should try getting a steady supply of antibiotics and anti-malarials first. But just last week as she was conducting a walking tour of one of the poorest areas in the country, she realised what she could achieve if most or all of the children there had these laptops. She's since signed on to our national OLPC project as a content developer.

      Solving communications is a necessary - but not sufficient - element of development. The XO doesn't remove the need for vast amounts of material aid, but it makes it so much easier for development projects to actually succeed.

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    7. Re:What "need" does this fulfill? by mysticgoat · · Score: 1

      Think of these XOs as a very cheap way of distributing all the textbooks needed to take a child through the K-12 years.

      After contemplating the cost of an XO vs. the cost of printing and shipping several hundred pounds of textbooks (and dry bookshelves to hold them all), it might be worthwhile to look at what can happen after K-12, through initiatives like MIT's OpenCourseWare.

    8. Re:What "need" does this fulfill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's Africa.

      Who. Gives. A. Fuck.

      The West has spent billions, nay trillions over the last 500 years on people who (a) claim to have invented civilization but (b) can't get their shit together long enough to stop bashing each others' heads in or slicing off their women's clitori.

      Africa: get your shit together. By yourself. And when you've done so, you can repay us for all the help you've squandered.

    9. Re:What "need" does this fulfill? by tedswiss · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here, here! Jon "Maddog" Hall spoke at the Ohio Linux Fest last week on "computing off the grid." In his presentation he spoke eloquently on the multitude of good uses for the XO/OLPC program, and the caveats of thinking like a "westerner" in non-western geographies. A very interesting ~45 mins. Here's a bad quality, but understandable MP3 of his speech.

  36. ridiculous technocentric exuberance by drDugan · · Score: 0, Troll

    At the risk of getting flames from a tech-oriented /. crowd, I still don't agree or possibly don't fully understand the mentality behind a push to get laptops into the hands of children in poor countries. I see it as folly, and missing the point of what people really want.

    Strip away all the bullshit of society and people are very simple emotion-driven machines: they want the good feelings and they avoid the bad feelings. That's it. At the deepest level, there is nothing more - everything else people want is an artifact or support within a (very) dysfunctional cultural system. Good feelings come from learning, food, sex, (long term) safety, love, and gratification (self worth). Bad feelings come from physical pain, attachment, sickness, hunger, sorrow, guilt, shame, anger and hate. These lists are incomplete and gross simplifications - but no where in there is the latest technology, the fastest ipod/palm pilot/pc/ whatever. No where on the lists is the fastest Comcast download speed, a cool car, or any of the other techno-pushed bullshit that people think is important.

    The only reasons people want this stuff (new technology) both in 1st worlds and 3rd, is that these people get the emotions they want in society when they have them. Expensive do-dads are signals of status and status gets you laid, it gets you security through a job, it gives (sort of) some access to learning, and from ones job, it gets you food and a safe place to live. I can't help but think that pushing laptops into children of third world countries we are exporting our own techno-centric unhealth, our materialistic orientation on how to have the feelings we really want, but that new technology does not and can not give us.

    There is extreme irony that the same technology that reflects signals of status also supports online systems of non-economic status that is increasingly important (explicit reputation), and cannot be easily purchased. Reputation- explicit, online and public is enabled in a connected world, and (I think) will become more powerful than the petty materialism people revert to in order to have self worth within a culture that thrives on most people having low self worth and working hard to make up for it. In fact, these systems are already here, people just have not realized it yet - as it takes years for people to understand how the rules of society change.

    1. Re:ridiculous technocentric exuberance by repetty · · Score: 1

      > At the risk of getting flames from a tech-oriented /. crowd,
      > I still don't agree or possibly don't fully understand the
      > mentality behind a push to get laptops into the hands of
      > children in poor countries. I see it as folly, and missing
      > the point of what people really want.

      Coming from someone who owns a laptop?

      --Richard

    2. Re:ridiculous technocentric exuberance by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      The only reasons people want this stuff (new technology) both in 1st worlds and 3rd, is that these people get the emotions they want in society when they have them. Expensive do-dads are signals of status and status gets you laid, it gets you security through a job, it gives (sort of) some access to learning, and from ones job, it gets you food and a safe place to live. While I agree that people who are struggling for survival are going to have bigger priorities, it is entirely possible to like the things you listed for their own sake. I like my nice computer, for example. It's never gotten me laid (and almost certainly never will, if anything it hurts my ability to get laid, a la nerd stereotypes), I don't care if other people know I have it, and it certainly hasn't helped me learn or get me a job. In short, it provides me with none of the basic needs you listed there, yet I still like it. I like it because I like technology, and it interests me, not because of some nonsense that it makes me feel more loved or accepted.
      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    3. Re:ridiculous technocentric exuberance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting. So when are you giving up your computer?

      Oh, right: you're completely immune to "techno-centric unhealth" and "petty materialism", because you are such an awesome d00d.

      Good thing those morons in the Third World have brilliant and privileged First World philosopher kings like you to make their decisions for them, isn't it?

      Do you have any idea how racist you sound?

      Of course you don't.

    4. Re:ridiculous technocentric exuberance by KnowledgeKeeper · · Score: 2, Insightful

      At the risk of getting flames from a tech-oriented /. crowd, I still don't agree or possibly don't fully understand the mentality behind a push to get laptops into the hands of children in poor countries. I see it as folly, and missing the point of what people really want.

      No need to flame, just listen to an explanation - what if those laptops came with a tiny version of wikipedia? Math, physics, engineering, agriculture texts and some instructional videos. Maybe some chemistry and biology. Perhaps they even start some knowledge oriented communities. Using that they can get to know about their surroundings and after some time even innovate. They could use our tech to set up their environment for a more comfortable and pro-intellectual atmosphere.

      Who knows, maybe somebody out there gets to start a herbal-oriented medicine wiki and we get some use of it. If that's the case, it's worth it. Who knows what _WE_ are missing by not doing this ten years ago. Cure for cancer, cure for baldness (ha, got your attention there, have I? :) ), ebola or even foot and mouth disease. Whatever the case, with this thing the future looks bright - hopefully, our civilization could get a few thousand great scientists more a year in ten to twenty years (considering African birth rate and assuming less baby, children and adult deaths due to less stupidity, STDs and wars).

      --
      It is always better to be a first grade version of yourself than a second grade version of someone else.
    5. Re:ridiculous technocentric exuberance by popo · · Score: 1

      No. Do not dismiss this comment. It is enormously valid.

      Having spent time in the developing world, I feel this same sentiment intensely.

      The notion that access to free information (and access to electronic document creation/manipulation) is some sort of key to prosperity may be well intentioned, but ultimately "rich and clueless" in many ways.

      The solution to poverty is not available on the Internet. Nor are (contrary to the beliefs of rich white kids) political communication, journalistic freedoms and unfettered expression guaranteed by the Internet. Just ask the billion-plus population of China who can't Google "Democracy".

      What would help much more than a free laptop, is political pressure on regimes that repress their own populations. The reality is that the United States and Europe (Both) actively support despotic regimes that not only practice horrific violations of human rights but everyday repression of their populations.

      The OLPC program is well intentioned -- and may do some good (we all hope). But the unspoken reality is that the 'power' of a laptop is greater in the West than it is elsewhere in the world. If we are, as a people, truly interested in affecting change in the less-free parts of the globe, there are far more effective ways to create change than giving away electronics.

      That having been said: There are an infinite number of things that need to be done. This isn't a bad program. In fact it's a nice one. It's just not going to be terribly effective at reaching the ultimate political and social goals that it has set for itself.

      --
      ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
  37. An alternative by suitti · · Score: 1

    My five year old Palm has become unreliable, and i'm replacing it. I've purchased a Nokia 770. It was about $150, but there were deals as low as $130. It's on closeout - the 800 is out. That's something like $100. It runs Linux. It's not a laptop. It's more shirt pocket form factor.

    It comes with a video player, audio player, web browser (it does WiFi, BlueTooth, and USB), email, chat, PDF reader, wordpad (HTML instead of RTF), games like chess, mahjong. There are a bunch of apps that can be downloaded for free, so, presumably, it could be distributed with a good collection.

    OK, so there's no keyboard. There's a microphone, but no voice recognition. But that's just a matter of software, right?

    More serious is that there does not appear to be a word processor. You can deconvolve Word and read it...

    Anyway, with some serious software porting, this device could really kick.

    64 MB RAM, 128 MB flash onboard. A slot comes with a 64 MB flash card. I've got a 2 GB flash on order...

    You might say that it isn't a laptop. But for me, it is. I intend to use it as i used my old laptop.

    --
    -- Stephen.
  38. Only the extremes exist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This laptop is for poor kids whose basic necessities are taken care of. Do you have a problem understanding that? LET ME REPEAT IT -- This laptop is for poor kids whose basic necessities are taken care of. There are poor people without adequate access to education, who ALREADY HAVE ENOUGH to eat and basic health care. Education is needed so they can have even more things so they won't fallback into extreme poverty.

    1. Re:Only the extremes exist? by serginho · · Score: 1

      I'm well aware of that, but read the quote from TFA.

      But I live in Brazil, one of the mains backers of this project, at least vocally. And I know that many kids here could benefit from these computers. But I am sure that this money could be spent elsewhere, because even in this country, which has in general better living standards than many others, there are still a lot of desperate people. People that don't have enough to eat. Millions of people still don't have access to clean water and basic sanitation. I say they should be a priority.

      This project is a blessing for corrupt politicians, and we have plenty of them here. They will hand them thinking only in their electoral benefits. They will not care if the laptops will be taken care of, whether there will be proper maintenance or if the kids will be subject to robberies because of the computers. They won't lose a minute of their time wondering if teachers are prepared to deal with computers in the classroom.

      I am all for technology, and I do believe they can be of great help to a student. But I believe first that everyone should live in humane conditions, and that the money that's somehow left from corruption should be spent *very* wisely.

    2. Re:Only the extremes exist? by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      To cure the world of poor living standards you have to first start with education. If you don't start with education your country will be full of useless idiot beggars depending on the handouts of a government.

      The XO is a step in the right direction to improve education by providing the ability to make available vast amounts of information to students that normally wouldn't have the opportunity because of their birth location.

    3. Re:Only the extremes exist? by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      But I live in Brazil, one of the mains backers of this project, at least vocally. And I know that many kids here could benefit from these computers. But I am sure that this money could be spent elsewhere, because even in this country, which has in general better living standards than many others, there are still a lot of desperate people. People that don't have enough to eat. Millions of people still don't have access to clean water and basic sanitation. I say they should be a priority.

      Further up the thread I mentioned how Brazil was one of the supporter of the OLPC and made a suggestion. If the OLPC were to have the XOs made as close to where they are used it could produce another benefit. In Brazil for instance if the laptops were made in Brazil this would create jobs. Even better is to make them even closer, such as in the favelas of Rio for the schools of Rio. Then some workers could take their skills and apply them to building computers for business and home users. Others might learn programming thus learn to program for businesses. The creation of new jobs would boost the economy creating more jobs. With more people working there's more incentive for people to also farm and grow food for those workers, while also creating more opportunities in construction. Each job created can create more jobs.

      Falcon
    4. Re:Only the extremes exist? by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 1

      You are very welcome to form your own group devoting millions of dollars of effort to improving the living standards of poor children in your own way if you like to.

      As it stands, you are just a whiner who hasn't done anything, complaining about those who are doing something,

    5. Re:Only the extremes exist? by hauntingthunder · · Score: 1

      I agree

      There are large areas of Brazil that are effectivly deserts with very little clean water for most of the year where 25% of kids die before they are 5.

      Of course come election time politicians buy votes with water tankers - which vanish after the elections. Sort that out first OXFAM are doing a project to build storage tanks so villages can save the water in the rainy season $100 would be far better spent on projects like this.

      --
      You will never get to heaven with an Ak 47... But A Zu 30 is good for Low Flying Cherubim
  39. Re:first tits! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Modded troll? Jeez, what a bunch of uptight, naive moderators.

  40. 120 Euro laptop? by peter303 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Price has been nearly constant in Euros since the project was conceived :-)

    1. Re:120 Euro laptop? by chris_sawtell · · Score: 1

      No, no, not 'Funny' at all. 'Score:5, Tragically Insightful' would be more to the point.

    2. Re:120 Euro laptop? by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      It is tragically insightful at the same time that Apple/Dell/etc. products sell with a 1 dollar : 1 euro price tag around here in Europe, compared to US prices. Probably these machines would become dead cheap for Europeans if they would start correcting the european prices to what the machines are apparently worth in dollars. Then again, enough is sold with these high prices already and they don't want to lose their margins.

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
  41. Evidently, you have never seen one! by feranick · · Score: 1

    "the OLPC comes with OpenOffice and Gimp" No, it doesn't. They both fall into the "bloated" software category, and they would run really poorly on the device (possibly the GIMP, for sure openoffice.org.

  42. And turning it the other way ... by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

    I can't help but being reminded of this guy. I think this is a strong enabling sign for children -- he represents a symbol of someone who doesn't need to take crap from scrawny weaklings like you people.

  43. Sold. by Triv · · Score: 1

    Okay. Seen reviews of the software, the hardware and the man behind the project. I'll pay 300-400 dollars for one Right The Hell Now. So where do I get one?


    Triv

    1. Re:Sold. by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      On November 12th there will bve a 2 week period of selling to the public for $400.00 each.

      This covers 2 laptops (approx $180 before the half point interest rate cut) and a little extra for small scale distribution. I imagine S&H will be added to help the distribution too.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    2. Re:Sold. by Anzhr · · Score: 1

      I'm buying one (and thus one for a kid somewhere). I was looking for a FOSS, hackable, eBook reader for PDF tutorials on learning Python programming. The closest thing I could find was the Nokia n800 that could do all manner of things I don't need it for. The XO is designed to help kids learn to program in Python (and some other contexts). While the OLPC project is flawed in many ways I am interested in it for the same reason I use Ubuntu rather than some other distro: broadening the informational context of people throughout the world in a manner that allows them to participate in rather than merely be subject to or consume what is merely available. Food often does not get to the kids who need it. OLPC might help kids learn why and help them to be capable of changing that.

  44. Review Reminds Me of the Old Days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reminds me of the early days where the power of tech's rapid growth was really starting to impress itself on people. Back in the day when we read the first few issues of Wired, where they would feature true rebel / revolutionaries of the digital world, rather than the bloated titans of industry that we mostly get now. Back when there was a palpable exitement about tech in the air. When we all thought that computers and the internet and unimagined digital wonders would really and finally make life better for everyone -- bringing power to the people, spreading the word, the freedom of information, and all that.

    Those old days are gone for us, but for a couple billion third world grade schoolers, they are just beginning. And I envy them for that.

  45. I, for one, welcome our XO overlords by Cervantes · · Score: 1

    I'm happy to see this getting off the ground, finally. And I'm happy to see a limited US run. I hope many of the well-to-do schools decide to sponsor a Third-World school and do some fundraising to that end. I mean, seriously, Little Suzy can raise thousands of dollars so her Girl Scout group can go to Disneyland... I'm sure at least a few benevolent people will try to do something a little more valuable to the world.

    And to all the damn naysayers out there... Information is Power. Even a little bit helps a lot. Even one laptop and a little bit of internet in a village will help that village learn, will help them find answers to their problems, and will help them communicate with the outside world. Things like the solar panel add-on and the pull-cord power generator are just plain smart, and the Mesh network is also a great idea. I hope this takes off enough for someone to develop a simple cell-network-based dish assembly (with solar power and pull-cord generator) to provide internet access. Sure, it may be dial-up slow, but who cares? For many of these people, this may be the first real exposure they have to technology, and the first real chance to experience something outside of their little slice of the world.

    Plus, now there's a chance for better learning, even for those who don't have net access. There's always relief orgs and missionaries crisscrossing the continent. Now, instead of having to carry piles of books... bring a pack of memory cards loaded with some useful books and teaching materials. It's a whole new chance for people to learn a whole new world. And whether it sells millions or just thousands, it doesn't matter. At least a few people will benefit, at least some parts of the world will change for the better. Everyone whining about the specs or the market or the "I can buy a better Compaq" is missing the point entirely.

    I only wish I had $400,000,000, and the extra $$ to distribute these to the neediest sections of the world and train everyone up on it. That, unlike Disneyland, or Save the Dolphins, or Sweet-16 breast implants, really is a way to chance the world.

    And on a seperate note... I hope they do take off a bit in the US. It'd be nice to see schoolkids with a platform like this for collaboration and learning. With the low cost, robust construction, and targeted software, it'd be a great way for kids to learn about computers without sitting in front of a quad core p4 playing a stupid Flash game while secretly browsing Victorias Secret in the background.

    --
    If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
  46. $200? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK its a $100 laptop. Then why does it cost $200 to send one to a child. I know shipping to remote locations, perhaps by hand...but if I sent 50 of them they can send them for less you'd think right?

  47. You are short sighted. by geekoid · · Score: 1

    The reason for giving these to people in 3rd world countries is to allow access to information. Information that can help them improve their lot. Educated societies are needed to have continuous and reliable infrastructure.

    "No where on the lists is the fastest Comcast download speed, a cool car, or any of the other techno-pushed bullshit that people think is important."

    oh really?
    Lets see:
    Being online allows one to communicate with LOVED one. -- Love
    It gives a person options to improve you FAMILIES lives. -- Security
    It allow you to educate yourself -- Learning
    Can be used to pool resource of food -- eating
    Can be used to find out what your government is doing, tell you what water sources are bad -- Long term safety.
    By helping you improve you, and your families lives improves gratification.

    You think you thinking is about some enlightened state, but really you just lack imagination.

    Online reputation is meaningless. It's to easy to mess with. Astro-turfing being the most blatant example. The only reputation that matters is the same as always: How they treated you, or people you trust.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  48. yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i wonder why he didn't post any screenshots? oh wait i know... CUZ IT SUCKS!!!

  49. Give 1, Get 1 - Great but Dangerous by tmdybvik · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The "Give 1, Get 1" program is in many ways a great initiative, that could allow this program to gradually become self financing, at least considerably less expensive. It also drives manufacturing scale, reducing unit cost, at least initially.

    There will be plenty of takers for the foreseeable future. The program caters to peoples vanity, allowing the giver to flaunt their generosity. Nothing appeals more to the western world than gadgets and vanity, and if our obsessions can fuel third world education, then that would be the best thing since sliced bread.

    Governments could also benefits from a relatively low-cost rugged PC. Try to get a reasonably equipped, rugged piece of hardware for $400. You can't.

    However, the laptops for sale should be of a different colour, for instance red. This would alleviate one of the biggest concerns of the program --- that stolen green laptops became a major source of revenue to corrupt government officials, or to parents who found a few dollars more tempting than their child's education. The goods will eventually end up in the hand of westerners who act like Santa Claus but are actually stealing from the kids --- a disturbing thought.

    Selling the standard green laptop is a gigantic mistake. By all means keep the production line the same, but please change (at least) the colour of the enclosure for the resale variant. Help keep the green XO in the hands of its intended users.

    --

    -- Fortes Fortuna Adjuvat --
  50. Ebook Reader by failedlogic · · Score: 1

    Pogue brings up the point of using the device as an eBook reader. I think this would be a great idea. It beats the likely DRM enabled Sony readers that are to arrive on the market.

    The screen looks big enough to read a lot of text, turn the display to B&W, buy cheap batteries, run with a solar panel, and by buying one are helping children in a developing country.

    BTW - if you find the NYT video slow, its on YouTube as well.

  51. who cares about hardware, when... by djradon · · Score: 1



    "...one keystroke reveals the underlying code of almost any XO program or any Web page. Students can not only study how their favorite programs have been written, but even experiment by making changes. (If they make a mess of things, they can restore the original.)"

    This makes these things the coolest thing ever! Every application is fully customizable. That's software freedom at it's most beautiful.

  52. Re:Give 1, Get 1 - Great but Dangerous by webmaster404 · · Score: 1

    The problem with that is, for some children, the $150 they can get from it would be worth more then the computer. For example if you can use that $150 to buy food or medicine or other needs. I'm all for this project (The more Linux users the better) but if your trying to stop them from reselling them, it has the same effects of the RIAA/MPAA trying to stop you from reselling music/movies. It should be the children's property, not the government's, if they want to sell it to us westerners fine, if they want to use it like they intended let the do that.

    --
    There is no "disagree" moderation, and troll, flamebait and overrated are not valid substitutes
  53. Sell them as by geekoid · · Score: 3, Informative

    '1st start' computer for 100 bucks. Make them bright black, yellow, pink, or purple.

    Once the kids friends realize how much power they will have, they all will want one. By the time the parents realize what's up it will be to late.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  54. Re:first tits! by timeOday · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "There are also three programming environments of different degrees of sophistication. Incredibly, one keystroke reveals the underlying code of almost any XO program or any Web page. Students can not only study how their favorite programs have been written, but even experiment by making changes. (If they make a mess of things, they can restore the original.)" OK, you were asking for open hardware, but still I think that is pretty amazing.

  55. Yar! by hexadecimate · · Score: 1
    Yar-har!

    Argh!

    [thud]

  56. I'll be Buying and USING the XO by ChaoticCoyote · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'll be picking up at least one of these machines -- well, two, since if I buy one for $400, they send another one to a kid somewhere who needs it.

    I hope the distribution isn't limited to third-world countries; there are some poor areas right here in the U.S. that could use these machines. Certain Indian reservations come to mind...

    I need a computer with decent outdoor screen and great battery life, one that's cheap enough I can afford to let it sink into a swamp without diving in and fighting the alligators and leeches for it (I do wildlife research in Florida). This machine may be just the ticket.

    1. Re:I'll be Buying and USING the XO by tqft · · Score: 1

      You know in some countries work related tax deductions are allowed.

      How many did you need and can you afford to pay for while you wait for the tax refund?

      --
      The Singularity is closer than you think
      Quant
    2. Re:I'll be Buying and USING the XO by jnowlan · · Score: 1

      Good. In terms of marketing, I would hope that they would market to (rich) kids. Make it a cool niche thing, then all kids will want one and pester their parents for one. Parents can feel good knowing they are helping out. I want one.

  57. Re:first tits! by LowSNR · · Score: 1

    A complete schematic probably wouldn't help much. There isn't much mystery any more in putting together a computer. The challenge is in the layout -- placing high-speed narrow-pitch bus lines, etc. Heck, given a week or so I can research data sheets and put together a schematic for an ARM-based machine with PS/2 for input, LCD for display, and USB/IDE for storage. Slap Linux on it and there you go.

  58. dont you mean SUCK MY BALLS OLPC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    after all, that is what teabagging is all about

  59. I've got a great eBook reader. by argent · · Score: 1

    Who cares about dedicated eBook readers. Any PDA does as good a job, and you're not locked in to DRMed formats.

    1. Re:I've got a great eBook reader. by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Who cares about dedicated eBook readers. Any PDA does as good a job, and you're not locked in to DRMed formats.


      Most PDA's don't have the high-resolution displays of good dedicated eBook readers or the XO, because being used as e-book readers wasn't high on their list of priorities. IMO, most PDA's don't make good e-Book readers.

    2. Re:I've got a great eBook reader. by argent · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Most PDA's don't have the high-resolution displays of good dedicated eBook readers or the XO

      Most dedicated eBook readers are bigger than a hardcover, far too big to slip into your pocket. And my Clie has at least the same resolution as the good eBook readers I've seen, it just has a smaller screen... about half the size of a page of a paperback.

      IMO, most PDA's don't make good e-Book readers.

      IMO, most eBook readers don't make as good eBook readers as PDAs do. Being able to fit into my pocket is for me a non-negotiable feature, and something the size of a hardback book doesn't qualify.

    3. Re:I've got a great eBook reader. by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Being able to fit into my pocket is for me a non-negotiable feature

      Well, at least we know *you* don't want one. But... why do you think we care?

    4. Re:I've got a great eBook reader. by Axello · · Score: 1

      Most 'Pocket'books don't fit in my pockets either. So that means you simply never read plain-paper books?

    5. Re:I've got a great eBook reader. by argent · · Score: 1

      Most 'Pocket'books don't fit in my pockets either.

      If you wear tight-fitting trendy jeans, no, but it can be a challenge carrying a cellphone in jeans pockets sometimes.

      If you wear slacks, or a jacket, or any other kind of clothes designed for comfort, you can easily fit a standard paperback in your pocket. This doesn't mean you carry them there all the time, but it means that if you ARE carrying a book you can stick it in your pocket when you need two hands for other things, instead of juggling it under your arm.

      So that means you simply never read plain-paper books?

      Actually, there's a germ of reality there. It means that I can read something other than price tags when I'm waiting in line, and in an office I don't have to put up with a choice of "Sports Illustrated" or "Weekly Accounting Adventures" or "Embarassing Photographs of Medical Problems Daily" like I used to.

    6. Re:I've got a great eBook reader. by argent · · Score: 1

      But... why do you think we care?

      Don't know, mate, I'm not the one moaning that I need insane resolution and screen size from an eBook reader. If you need a frigging laptop screen before you're willing to read digital books, I don't think you really need an eBook reader at all.

      Meanwhile there's enough people like me to keep Fictionwise and Webscriptions in business.

    7. Re:I've got a great eBook reader. by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      If you need a frigging laptop screen before you're willing to read digital books, I don't think you really need an eBook reader at all.

      Funny. Sony, among others, seem to disagree with you. Maybe you should tell them, I'm sure they'd love to know why their ebook reader products are, apparently, entirely useless.

  60. That mesh network thing is too cool. by GnarlyDoug · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I really love the mesh network concept. That should be in the big three operating systems already. Hopefully this will spur the adaptation of this concept to the big operating systems. I can see huge uses for it, from collaborative projects to gaming and of course education.

    1. Re:That mesh network thing is too cool. by Cosmic+AC · · Score: 1

      Well, they do have ad-hoc networking...

  61. more innovation in one box than the last 10 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a fantastic device.

    Yes, there are moral questions (laptop vs. clean water?) although even that's far more grey than black or white. So lets assume for now there is a morally valid market for it.

    Now look at the technology. When was the last time this amount of disruptive innovation hit the mainstream market? Shows what happens when creative spirit and Occam's razor are combined. Simple, cheap, efficient, effective.

    Compare and contrast: Windows Vista, 7 years and hundreds of millions in the making, all to produce a questionable evolution of XP. Vs. OLPC. 'Nuff said.

    Good luck OLPC, you deserve to succeed for technical brilliance alone.

  62. And of course.. by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    Realists fear the majority of them will end up on eBay.

  63. Re:Give 1, Get 1 - Great but Dangerous by blindd0t · · Score: 1

    Nothing appeals more to the western world than gadgets and vanity

    So I suppose that means we can't afford to have this effort go too well. I mean, if the smug gets any thicker in America, we may soon be unable to see through it! (this is a SouthPark reference, of course)

  64. Trolling or not? by Steauengeglase · · Score: 1

    So Pogue isn't complaining about the XO not being an Apple product?

  65. Re:Give 1, Get 1 - Great but Dangerous by tmdybvik · · Score: 1

    It was given to the children to enable them to learn. Same thing as with text books.

    If you asked a seven year old on a rainy Monday morning if he would rather have his text books, or the $200 (or equivalent in candy) that the text books cost, then the kid will take the candy, 9 out of 10.

    So according to your reasoning, we should give all kids the choice of money/candy or textbooks/schooling, and make it really easy for kids or corrupt government to translate their XO's into cash? Is this what you meant?

    --

    -- Fortes Fortuna Adjuvat --
  66. Easy question. by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 1

    Why should anyone care what they think?

    Because they might try to act on their beliefs, that's why.

  67. Question your US-centric attitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fact that [PRODUCT X] are not offered in US [toy] stores even before pushing them abroad makes me suspect that they are [seriously underpowered] ... and are not as [fun and cool] Classic US-centric attitude... If Americans can't buy Product X within 5 minutes of an interstate exit, Product X has yet to be properly validated and should be viewed with suspicion.

    Sure, America does a great job at... well, something I'm sure. But there are so many examples of why your logic is faulty. Food... cell phones... vehicles... clothing... shoes... watches... eyeglasses... Seek those products outside of your borders. So why be surprised that another innovation isn't concerned with American success?
  68. Re:Give 1, Get 1 - Great but Dangerous by webmaster404 · · Score: 1

    Actually that wasn't what I said...

    1. These are Third World Countries its not America or Europe, these children don't have the choice between staying at home watching TV for a day or going to school, its either go to school or go to work in many times unsanitary conditions for substandard wages, however though if its between going to school or feeding yourself for a few months because your parents are dying from *insert sickness here* and the cure is either not invented (like AIDS) or expensive (Malaria) to cure.

    2. If your starving/sick/dehydrated it doesn't matter if you have perfect attendance to school if in a year if you don't have the money your going to die.

    3. Yes it should be easy for the kids to change their laptops to cash if thats what they are going to need to survive, as for the governments thats why they should be handed out by third parties independent of governments.

    I fully support the project but to say that the children should have a laptop rather then food/clean water/medicine is totally outrageous. Im not advacating that these children should sell the laptops, but I would rather them do that then die.

    --
    There is no "disagree" moderation, and troll, flamebait and overrated are not valid substitutes
  69. Nice feature... by AndyCR · · Score: 1

    Control+Space to view source code of whatever you're using... Darn do I wish I had that when I was learning to use computers and program.

    --
    If there's anyone I hate more than stupid people, it's intellectuals.
  70. Re:A child?? I must have turn the logo the wrong w by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

    The laptop is now called the XO, because if you turn the logo 90 degrees, it looks like a child.

    And with no rotation whatsoever XO looks like the emoticon for Cartman. Makes a perfect reaction to XP.

    --
    ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
  71. Re:A child?? I must have turn the logo the wrong w by bastardknight · · Score: 0

    http://laptop.org/ you have to see the actual logo to understand.

  72. Wikipedia by Twinbee · · Score: 1

    In case they have little or no access to the internet, pehaps it's a good idea to offer a local condensed copy of Wikipedia, perhaps with an emphasis on science, math, agriculture and technology?

    --
    Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    1. Re:Wikipedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That actually isnt a bad idea.

  73. I think so Brain... by ender- · · Score: 1

    Equally off topic:
      I'm kind of partial to, "I think so Brain, but where are we going to find a duck and a rubber hose at this hour?"

  74. Nigerian 419 scammers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ... fear that their scams will be outsource to Congolese child labor.

  75. Never underestimate these people. by IonOtter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Critics fear that the poorest countries need food, malaria protection and clean water far more than computers.

    "Give a man a fish, feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish, feed him for a lifetime." Or teach him to phish and he'll buy a mansion and a couple of Ferraris.

    But seriously, this is a fatuous statement at best, and downright offensive otherwise. Look at what happens when you give these people cellphones and PDA's? How PDA's Are Saving Lives in Africa

    Imagine what they can do with computers that not only have some serious processing power, but have multiple interfaces? WiFi, keyboard, mouse, screen and more? Now those PDA's and cellphones can get data from the XO Laptop in their home, send it along the cell network to whomever.

    Right now, the farmers can take pictures of the bugs eating their crops with a PDA or cellphone and send that image to a research facility for the best advice on how to counter the pests. With the XO, they can download a small library of insect pests common to their region and find it themselves, along with the necessary advice.

    THEN they put it out on the XO Net and the PDA/cell network, where it's sent to ALL the farmers in the region. "Look out! Locusts spotted in our village, heading east!"

    Suddenly, farmers and villages can take a proactive approach to their lives.

    Or howabout this?

    "Look out! Soldiers coming from Darfur! Everyone get out, we'll rendezvous at the well and head south!"

    Don't underestimate these people. They may need food, but these devices will help them get their OWN food.

    --
    [End Of Line]
  76. will XO fail? by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    Hopefully, trying out XO will involve a few dozen pilot projects in different countries. Given what studies have shown in the U.S. about the value of computers to education, I expect the pilot projects to show that the laptops would be a tremendous waste of money .

    Unlike the US in which every child can be issued textbooks, which constantly need to be updated and corrected, the Third World can't always afford new books for all kids. Using broadband text on a laptop can easily and quickly be both updated and corrected. One NGO in Africa is setting just such a project, they setup satellite dishes so current e-text can be used in schools.

    Also though I don't know if XO is doing it or plans to but if local manufactures are used to build these laptops they can create jobs locally.

    Falcon
  77. camping and weight by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    The durability and the low power consumption make this very interesting to me. If I can plug my phone into it via a USB port it could be a great connectivity solution while camping. (Festival-type campground camping in rural but not backwoods areas, where I can still get a cell signal, and be reachable in case of a work emergency. Backwoods camping is a different beast, if I'm going to the woods I am gone and don't expect to reach me.)

    When in the backwoods hiking I want to be able to upload my photos, so what I'd like is a laptop with wireless broadband where the signal can travel hundreds of miles. And the weight doesn't matter as much to me as it seems to matter to others. The way I look at it is that if I can't backpack with 50 lbs now when I used to backpack with 100 lbs I'm in real bad shape.

    Falcon
    1. Re:camping and weight by MBCook · · Score: 1

      That's kind of what I'm thinking. I love my MacBook Pro but there are times I really don't need it. Traveling, I might be able to easily get buy with just an OLPC that would let me do a little surfing or hacking. The battery life, weight, and size would be great. I don't need all the extra power most of the time.

      I've been very impressed and occasionally amazed with the little things as I've followed their saga. I would love one, but I'm just not sure I'm up to the $400. At $200, almost no question. At $300, decent change. At $400, it's just too much. I know it's buy-one-donate-one, but that's still just too high. After a little time as some neat software starts appearing, they may get me. Initial run? I'm not very sure.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    2. Re:camping and weight by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      That's kind of what I'm thinking. I love my MacBook Pro but there are times I really don't need it. Traveling, I might be able to easily get buy with just an OLPC that would let me do a little surfing or hacking. The battery life, weight, and size would be great. I don't need all the extra power most of the time.

      Though I've only had my Macbook Pro several weeks I love it too. However as I'd be taking my camera as well I want more storage and the ability to do some preliminary editing as well.

      At $400, it's just too much. I know it's buy-one-donate-one, but that's still just too high.

      After spending more than $3000 on my new MBP I don't think $400 is too much if it can be used for what I want to do with it. I admit is a lot for me, and half of the price of Photoshop CS. Then again I'm on disability and don't work. I'm hoping to break into photography though.

      Falcon
  78. Mods! This is a TROLL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do not like this sarcastic tone. Please mod down.

    Captcha: dishonor

  79. XO XD XP Xl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People, if you're going to name a product with only two characters, please check that they don't form an emoticon first. Windows XP made me laugh enough already.

    1. Re:XO XD XP Xl by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      People, if you're going to name a product with only two characters, please check that they don't form an emoticon first. Windows XP made me laugh enough already.

      xD

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  80. Dont compare them to laptops by Rsriram · · Score: 1

    These are not "laptops" or "computers". They are educational aids to help children learn different subjects in an interactive and interesting manner. The main objectives are

    a) To make education fun and interesting so children will stay in school.
    b) Make distribution of new educational material easy and reduce the number of books and text books needed.
    c) Help the next generation stay connected with the world, where possible.

    That it runs an operating system based on linux, has RAM or HDD or any technical stuff is irrelevant to the school child. A school child will be more than happy to call one of these their own and it will generate interest in education and learning. That is the goal.

    --
    O this learning! What a thing it is - William Shakespeare
  81. I don't know that it *is* neglecting other issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What better way to combat HIV than ensuring a large chunk of the population never gets laid, ever?

  82. Photo Opp by barl0w · · Score: 1

    You never realize how small these machines are until you see one next to an everyday-kind-of-laptop:

    http://flickr.com/photos/barl0w/1101266148/

    The keyboard reminds me of the first computer my dad and I soldered together

  83. microcredit by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    Other things help to, e.g., microcredit programs have been shown to be a big boon to economic development and provide opportunities to develop business skills to tackle bigger challenges

    Yea, the economist Dr. Yunus founder of the Grameen Bank, a microcredit bank, won a Nobel Peace Prize for his work on providing microcredit to the poor and showing it can improve people's lives. Combining the XO and microcredit may have a tremendous effect. Even farmers can see an improvement, one problem rural people have in the Third World is they don't know what resources they have or how much they can make from it. For instance whereas on the world market a coyote, trader, may only pay a farmer a penny per pound of coffee and the farmer not knowing coffee is being traded for a dollar per pound will accept the penny. But knowing how much coffee trades for the farmer can ask for a fairer price for his coffee. In India I heard of a program where instead of relying on traders, whether good or coyote, a farmer can list his produce on a trading site in the web and get an even better price.

    Falcon
  84. whose property is the XO? by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    It should be the children's property, not the government's,

    No, the XO is the property of whoever paid for it. I bet when you got your text books in school up through high school the books were issued to you and you had to return them. The same thing should be with these laptops.

    Falcon
  85. unemployment on India reservations by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    I hope the distribution isn't limited to third-world countries; there are some poor areas right here in the U.S. that could use these machines. Certain Indian reservations come to mind...

    Like the Rosebud reservation in the Blackhills, in 2003 it's unemployment was 85%. Or "Fort Mojave Indian Reservation along the California-Arizona-Nevada border, the unemployment rate climbed from 27.2 percent in 1991 to 74.2 percent in 1997."

    I need a computer with decent outdoor screen and great battery life, one that's cheap enough I can afford to let it sink into a swamp without diving in and fighting the alligators and leeches for it (I do wildlife research in Florida). This machine may be just the ticket.

    Na, go ahead and wrestle those gators, then cook yourself some gator tail. For some extras go to Hog Valley for some wild boor.

    Falcon
  86. Re:A child?? I must have turn the logo the wrong w by zobier · · Score: 1

    The laptop is now called the XO, because if you turn the logo 90 degrees, it looks like a child.

    And with no rotation whatsoever XO looks like the emoticon for Cartman. Makes a perfect reaction to XP.

    But, but XO XP; should have made it XQ
    --
    Me lost me cookie at the disco.
  87. Re:Give 1, Get 1 - Great but Dangerous by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 1

    How do people like you miss the umpteen million posts in response to every Slashdot story about the OLPC project that point out that these are being targeted at poor students who are not starving and dying, but who need better educational opportunities? Don't you read ANYTHING that anyone says in response to these articles? I've only skimmed through responses on several occasions and I've already been reminded many times that arguments like yours are completely specious. Not to mention that the OLPC project's web site addresses your question already, so RTFA already.

  88. Re:first tits! by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

    I think worrying about proprietary, undocumented hardware and a knowledge of boobs are mutually exclusive.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  89. OMYGOD - Its dangerous - lets ban it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And whilst were are at it, lets ban them from using fire. Its very dangerous if you use it wrongly you know.

  90. Who? by Whiteox · · Score: 1

    David Pogue is probably the most overrated and underinformed writer. He has lost all credulity for his inane opinions foisted upon us by his employers.

    --
    Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  91. The accountatns fear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like with copyright, they are afraid that SOMEONE ELSE is making money. That money should be THEIRS, godsdamnit!

  92. $100? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    It's like offering a $5,000 car, now only $20,000. ($10,000 if you are outside the US and Europe).

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  93. Re:first tits! by hey! · · Score: 1

    While I agree in spirit, I believe Negroponte has addressed this issue. The basic problem is that you can't jumpstart an informatics industry this way.

    Sure, you can assemble the things in country, but most of the value comes from the huge investements overseas producers have in facilities to churn out commodity items like RAM. The amount of value you can add in your country is tiny, maybe a boon to some local injection modling outfits, but not something that will make your country into the next India. And if you ARE India, you're local informatics industry runs more on the availability of educated people, cheap; a project like this is not going to make a national difference.

    There are downsides to local production too. The machines will arrive later, for more cost, since the value differential in question is infintessimal but the size of production is much larger. Also, to be frank, many countries who need this suffer from crony capitalism, and money will be siphoned off to the politically connected.

    I really think the "Buy 2 get 1" deal is a brilliant idea, because it allows the project to target, not relatively affluent government with a poverty problem (like Brazil), but cuts out the middleman and goes straight to the poor.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  94. Everybody's missing the point .. as usual. by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    You're so used to conventional desktop PCs that you can't see the wood for the trees.

    This isn't a "computer", it's a telephone-textbook-notepad.

    If somebody said they were giving mobile phones with unlimited calling to third world countries you'd think it was a good idea - communication is good!

    If somebody said they were giving radio-driven ebooks to the third world you'd think it was good.

    If somebody said they'd be giving children home terminals connected to the school you'd think it was good.

    The XO is all of this, and more.

    What is ISN'T is a Windows/Linux laptop - and that's a good thing, but don't expect any magazine reviewers to be able to look at through the eyes of a third world child.

    --
    No sig today...
  95. Try the software for yourself by teeks99 · · Score: 0

    For those wondering what the software actually looks like when it's running, wonder no more. You can download a VMware image that will run the XO operating system, with its installed software. There's directions for installing it on their wiki. (http://wiki.laptop.org/go/VMWare) P.S. For those commenting that XO looks like a skull and crossbones, look at their site icon on the wiki and you'll get what they were going for.

  96. Surfing Pr0n by queenb**ch · · Score: 1

    Don't get me wrong. I'm all in favor of addressing the digital divide, but the history of these things hasn't been stellar to say the least. The last time they tried this, they found out that all the kids were doing was surfing pr0n. I'm sure that's well worth spending money on - making sure that every elementary school kid world over can get their fair share of beaver shots.

    In fact, I'm pretty sure that the story about it appeared on /. The hardware isn't an issue. The software obviously is.

    2 cents,

    QueenB.

    --
    HDGary secures my bank :/
    1. Re:Surfing Pr0n by iamacat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Are you under the impression that children in developing countries are deprived of viewing nudity and sex? How do you think babies are breastfed? How do girls of their own age swim when they van not afford those fancy swimsuits? Where are their folks doing "it" in a shack sans multiple bedrooms?

      Prudishness is an american problem. And here viewing pr0n can be argued to have educational value more important than math.

  97. Nice troll. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm always amused when people are willing to respond seriously to a post with so many clearly intentional errors of fact.

  98. What's it going to hurt? by maclabs · · Score: 1

    Let's see what happens, for buddha's sake. So some people see some porn, whoopi. We seem to be doing fine in America with the sea of porn we have. The fact is, we don't have any idea of what's really going to happen. I sure do like the idea that we are giving people all of information of the world at their finger tips in ways they would never be able to without it.

  99. Competition by ben(zen) · · Score: 1

    Dear Mr. Anonymous Coward, That sort of statement, while also theoretically correct, does not really follow the meaning of the device. In reality, it is not designed to compete, it is designed to be sent to a region without actual resources. As a matter of fact, I think that with very few modifications (XO-plus?)[larger device, bigger keyboard, more memory/flashdisk space, and maybe a slightly faster proc.] it could compete as a low-end, easy, indestructible notebook computer (if it were done right, they might become big in government, since Lenovo is considered taboo currently...). Altogether, I think this is what was needed for the market.