Slashdot Mirror


Ticketmaster Claims Hacking Over Ticket Resale Site

FlopEJoe writes "Ticketmaster claims that RMG Technologies is providing software to avoid security measures on their website - even to the point of utilizing bots to get large blocks of tickets. RMG says it just 'provides a specialized browser for ticket brokers.' From the New York Times article: 'The fact that tickets to popular events sell out so quickly -- and that brokers and online resellers obtain them with such velocity -- is clouding the business, many in the music industry say. It is enough, some longtime concertgoers say, to make them long for the days when all they had to do to obtain tickets was camp out overnight.'"

49 of 317 comments (clear)

  1. Ticket Brokers Suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They are nothing more than scalpers.

    Of course, all that is needed to fix this is for tickets to be tied to the credit card. You buy the ticket with the card,you confirm it's your card when you get there.

    1. Re:Ticket Brokers Suck by Broken+scope · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What if you buy tickets for a friend... or you give them to a friend because something comes up and you can't go?

      --
      You mad
    2. Re:Ticket Brokers Suck by magarity · · Score: 2, Interesting

      all that is needed to fix this is for tickets to be tied to the credit card
       
      All you need to fix this is for tickets to be sold in an auction format. If the highest bidder is a scalper then they won't be able to sell it at a higher price on the marketplace. Presto, no more scalpers. Now to only make sure the bands get the increases in ticket retail values and not TicketMaster or the record companies.

    3. Re:Ticket Brokers Suck by DamnStupidElf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They are nothing more than scalpers.

      Damn straight! Service charge here, convenience charge there, credit card processing fee at the end... You were talking about ticketmaster, right?

    4. Re:Ticket Brokers Suck by MoriaOrc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because there's no way that someone can simultaneously have money and enjoy music...

    5. Re:Ticket Brokers Suck by Protonk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It still doesn't matter. If the band insists on doing this, then shortages will result, because you have more tickets demanded at that price than will be supplied. In this case you have a direct tradeoff ONLY if you assume that no one breaks the rules (hah). The tradeoff is this. If prices are allowed to rise to equilibrium, then some people will not be able to go because they can't afford it. If we hold prices low, then some people won't be able to go REGARDLESS of their ability to afford it.

      The band can make a goal to sell concert tickets cheaply, but if demand is such at that price that it outstrips supply, then they will have trouble meeting that goal. Scalpers move in to resell tickets at what is more likely the market price. Does this mean scalpers are good? No, of course not. Scalpers introduce all sorts of negative externalities, but they are making mutually beneficial transactions occur, they are pretty irrepresable in that regard.

    6. Re:Ticket Brokers Suck by rk075245 · · Score: 2, Funny

      All cheating ticketmaster, headmaster , keymaster , they are master's but all are fooled by BRAINMASTER who that "hacker".

    7. Re:Ticket Brokers Suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Have you been writing all the spam I get?

    8. Re:Ticket Brokers Suck by Firethorn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bingo - If you can sell out concerts at $400 per ticket, why sell tickets at $100 per ticket. Sure, you get the excuse 'but legions of my fans can't afford $400'. So what? They can buy the CD/music video DVD when it comes out. If nothing else, it's an incentive for various fans to get better paying jobs, save up, etc...

      If they really want to let the people who can only scrounge up $100 attend a show, then hold more concerts. Eventually even the rich fans will run out of money for multiple concerts.

      But yeah, I agree with you - I seriously doubt that 'yuppies' will attend many concerts of shows they aren't fans of.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    9. Re:Ticket Brokers Suck by roguetrick · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because capitalism doesn't work by adding more men in the middle who do nothing. The only part they may be thought to play is insurance that tickets will get sold, even if the concert is a flop. They're just human leeches.

      --
      -The world would be a better place if everyone had a hoverboard
    10. Re:Ticket Brokers Suck by senatorpjt · · Score: 2, Funny

      I am the gatekeeper. Are you the ticketmaster?

  2. Desperate for culture... by TheNarrator · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Speaking of Brittany Spears concerts, It throughly amazes me how desperate people are for "culture". Any public gathering that involves alcohol, some pretension of sophistication or spirituality, and good parking is absolutely overflowing with people these days. Maybe I'm just getting old :/

  3. Solution by Travis+Mansbridge · · Score: 2

    Sell some tickets online, sell some more at the venue.

    1. Re:Solution by Neoprofin · · Score: 2, Informative

      Depends on the show.

      A lot of people buy their tickets early, at face value, and would never consider paying scalper prices. A lot of other people don't bother and are willing to pay far far more. Raising the cost of tickets might force out 3rd parties, but it would, in many cases lead to fewer people buying tickets and thus less profit overall. There are probably very highly paid people working that sort of thing out.

    2. Re:Solution by timmarhy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      the tickets don't reflect the market at all. they are artifically high due to ticket* group of companys fixing prices.

      $100 a ticket to see a band? you've got to be kidding me.

      they lost my business years ago.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    3. Re:Solution by Sergeant+Pepper · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Uhh... artificially high? The fact that concerts for good bands sell out so quickly shows that they're NOT artificially high.

    4. Re:Solution by 644bd346996 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Forgetting your Econ 101 class? Price ceilings only help the poor when you make sure the poor are first in line. Otherwise, they end up helping the rich just as much (and in the real world, often more so).

    5. Re:Solution by cHiphead · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're older and have enough disposable income, the core fans typically do not for newer bands.

      --

      This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    6. Re:Solution by DAldredge · · Score: 2, Funny

      What age do you assume I am?

    7. Re:Solution by CastrTroy · · Score: 2

      Or just go to see different bands. There's probably about 20 different venues in any major city where you can see a live band for $10 or less at least once a week. I've even seen some pretty big name bands sell tickets for way less than $175. Last concert I went to was Slayer, ant it was about $50 for a ticket on the floor. The Eagles only charge $175 a ticket because they know all their fans are old, and have a bunch of money saved up, and will pay just about anything to see them. If a band like Slayer tried charging $175 for a ticket, their fans would just not go, no only because they couldn't afford it, but because it's just crazy to expect people to pay that much money.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    8. Re:Solution by empaler · · Score: 4, Funny

      Daldredge (2353)What age do you assume I am? 4-digit UID? Moses beats you by a nose hair.
  4. And we're to feel sorry?! by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ticketmaster's been bending us over for years...now we're to feel bad for them? It's too bad TM has such a stronghold on the industry - ticket sales ain't rocket science, especially not at a convenience fee of $10+.... per ticket.

    1. Re:And we're to feel sorry?! by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not a big fan of TicketMaster either, but anything to stop professional scalpers from buying up huge blocks of tickets is a good thing for the average fan.

      I do agree that their fees are overly high; on the other hand, their site does perform rather well under huge swells of traffic when popular event tickets go online. I've had much more frustrating experiences with some other online ticket sites that just buckled under the load.

    2. Re:And we're to feel sorry?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      That really sucks. You had to pay $300+, and you had to listen to Rascall Flatts.

    3. Re:And we're to feel sorry?! by jandrese · · Score: 5, Informative

      Does Ticketmaster actually do anything to stop scalpers? From what I've seen Scalpers seem to have a lot less trouble with their system than regular people. I really really hate buying tickets online from them. Lemme run down the experience:

      1. You navigate to their website past the dozens of scalper pretenders and through their horrible interface.
      2. Select your area and click go. It's not always clear where exactly the tickets are, but I guess if you do it enough you'll learn the terminology.
      3. Now you have to do their Captcha, which usually has a bunch of 1s and Os, or Is and 0s, it's a bit of a crapshoot getting it right.
      4. After a few minutes you get randomly given some seats. If you'd prefer to have one higher up but closer around a side or down the middle, well, tough. You can try to have more tickets randomly generated but they'll tend to be in the same area time and time again.
      5. Now you have to high stress part of buying the tickets. You're presented with a huge form with your name, address, etc... and told that if you can't fill all of the info in within 2 minutes then you'll lose your tickets and have to start over
      6. Do it again for the credit card info.
      7. And for the delivery part. If the site is going to crash, it will usually do it here, or the next page will just take more than a minute to load and when you finally get it the page will already be timed out.
      8. Otherwise you get the joy of spending $10 or $15 to have them email you a PDF and have you print it out on your own paper with your own ink. I'm sure glad they managed to email me for only $10.
      At least once you have the PDF (which tells you very clearly to print out the whole thing on an 8.5x11 or it won't be valid, despite the fact that 75% of the page is just ads). When you get to the venue all they care about is the barcode on the bottom.

      Every time I see the system I think I could write a website that could easily do the same thing for less than a dollar a ticket. The trick is of course that I wouldn't have the vast sums of money to buy out venues across the country to insure the monopoly.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    4. Re:And we're to feel sorry?! by bitingduck · · Score: 2, Informative

      Every time I see the system I think I could write a website that could easily do the same thing for less than a dollar a ticket. The trick is of course that I wouldn't have the vast sums of money to buy out venues across the country to insure the monopoly. brownpapertickets

      I've only used them once (or maybe twice), but it worked fine. It was when a band had *very* early advance ticket sales to supporters (essentially low level patrons).

      Ticketweb also handles a lot of small clubs in the LA area and isn't usually too expensive. It's gotten so that things are likely enough to sell out at small clubs that advance tickets are a good idea, even for a lot of local bands.

    5. Re:And we're to feel sorry?! by kindbud · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You do realize that the promoter for the event negotiates the service fee Ticketmaster will be allowed to collect? TM doesn't get to charge just any old fee they want without the promoter's explicit OK. If the promoter had his way, your ticket would have one figure on it, the face value, and all the fees and extras would be hidden in that single figure, and you'd not know there was anything to complain about. But state and local laws require varying degrees of itemization from place to place, and where disclosure requirements are most stringent, fans are most unhappy about ticket prices. Ignorance really is bliss sometimes.

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
    6. Re:And we're to feel sorry?! by tupletuple · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You do realize that Ticketmaster sells tickets exclusively (not including box office) for the vast majority of major venues across the US, don't you? You do realize what would happen to any act that challenged those fees, don't you? Watch the number of venues available to your act in vanish. No, TM doesn't get to pick any old fee to charge, but when a 600 pound, angry looking Gorilla says gimme, you gimme. So let us know, is ignorance bliss?

    7. Re:And we're to feel sorry?! by BrownPaperTickets · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ticket scalpers and the secondary market are a problem that my company has been dealing with for years. Our goal, of course, is to protect ticket buyers from the ill effects caused by the secondary scalping market without requiring them to jump through too many inconvenient hoops. The question then becomes how do you make things difficult for scalpers without also making them difficult for ticket buyers and event producers?

      We could require every ticket buyer to show their ID and credit card at the event to gain entry, but what about situations where a legitimate ticket buyer can't attend and wants to give or sell the ticket to someone else? Should a ticket buyer never be allowed to sell his or her ticket? And what about buying tickets as a gift for someone? Even if you ignored the problems this requirement would cause the ticket buyer, checking names on a list at the door can become a nearly impossible task for larger events with multiple points of entry.

      We could limit the number of tickets available for a single purchase. The problem here, of course, is that scalpers are always going to find a way to automate the purchase process, so really all you've accomplished is annoying people who want to legitimately buy a large number of tickets for their friends, family, class, etc.

      We could try to preempt the secondary market by offering some sort of built-in auction service. But then who gets the money from the increased ticket price? The original ticket buyer? Then all you've done is give scalpers a more convenient way to scalp. Does it go to the event producer? It should, but then why would anyone use our built in service when they could use an outside service and keep the profit for themselves? Should it go to the ticketing agency? Yes! (Kidding. Though in the case of some ticketing agencies, that's exactly what happens.)

      We could try to get the laws changed to disallow ticket reselling. But I don't believe that laws limiting peaceful civil interaction are ever in the best interest of the general public. And let's be honest, scalping laws are never going to be brought back anyway. There's way too much money and there are way too many lobbyists involved at this point. Whatever the solution is, it's either technologically or logistically based.

      I should probably submit this as an Ask Slashdot, but until that happens, I would be happy to chat with anyone who has suggestions for ways that we can protect ticket buyers from the secondary market without limiting their ability to give or sell tickets to others. You can message me through Slashdot or email me directly at slashdot at BrownPaperTickets dot com.

      William Scott Jordan, CTO
      Brown Paper Tickets
      http://www.brownpapertickets.com/

  5. One good turn deserves another... by garcia · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Coming from the company that has, for the longest time, been ripping off customers and making a killing off unnecessary ticket processing fees which are likely a hold-over from when they were outlets in shopping malls and telephone sales. There is absolutely no reason why I should have to pay such astronomical rates to a third party in order to get tickets for a show to support bands that I want to see because they don't support the RIAA.

    If anything, these companies are just paying you back for screwing over legitimate consumers for years by screwing you over more. The TicketMaster model is dead and everyone should really do their own ticketing in order to avoid this non-sense. I am much more likely to pay a band's direct ticketing agent than TicketMaster. Hell, I'm more likely to go to a show when I have to pay anyone other than TicketMaster to get the tickets for any event I attend whether it be sports, theater, or music.

    1. Re:One good turn deserves another... by garcia · · Score: 2

      Then support your local music scene. Chances are there are more than a few great bands in your city, and the clubs they play at don't even sell tickets through TicketMaster (or if they do it's only for the really big acts/shows). If you don't want to support the RIAA, then that means not supporting the bands on the member labels. It's as simple as that.

      Uhh, that's what I was talking about but thanks for allowing someone to waste their mod points on your post which is redundant.

  6. Several obvious solutions by davidwr · · Score: 5, Interesting

    1) Lottery
    2) Auction
    3) Non-transferable tickets

    An auction is the most capitalistic approach. Scalpers won't bid much lower than they think they can resell the tickets for later.

    A lottery adds some fairness but only if you can limit the number of tickets per buyer and avoid the straw-buyer problem.

    Non-transferable tickets that are refundable for 100% of the purchase price will solve the scalpers-buying-up-all-the-tickets problem but they aren't too useful if your target audience is children and others who don't have ID cards.

    For popular shows, I'd go with selling non-transferable tickets, where any adult would need an ID that matched the name on the ticket and children would have to be accompanied by someone sitting nearby. If after a few days the promoters realize a given block of seats is not expected to sell out, I would lift the non-transferable restriction and let people sell their tickets on the open market. Anyone needing to return tickets could get their money back less the usual ticket-service charge.

    If you show up with a non-transferable ticket in hand that doesn't have your name on it, you are turned away. You can contact the original purchaser to beg him to get you a refund.

    I'm not sure how this would work for shows oriented to the 12-15 crowd, as these people usually come without their parents but without any ID other than a school ID.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  7. It's their problem to solve, not mine. by m0nkyman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Waah. They can spend some of the money they get from ticket buyers to come up with solutions to protect their customers (the promoters that is). It's their problem to solve, and I ain't going to help them. If they can't solve it, promoters might stop using them, and I would consider it progress.

    --
    ~ a low user id is no indication I have a clue what I'm talking about.
  8. Captcha Problems by astrotek · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm assuming ticketmaster isn't implementing the captcha correctly. There is only 3 ways to exploit the system:

    1) enter in the captcha before the tickets go on sale, and purchase when available
    2) bypass the captcha because its not a requirement to make a purchase
    3) the captcha not complex enough to fool a computer for a few minutes

    No software should be getting around it without someone typing in the magic letters after the tickets go on sale.

    1. Re:Captcha Problems by astrotek · · Score: 2, Informative

      CAPTCHA = Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart

      A human using the system is beyond the stated scope.

  9. Led Zepplin fans with wrong CC get turned away by davidwr · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Led Zepplin held a lottery for tickets to an upcoming concert.

    They neglected to tell the winners the tickets were non-transferable.

    The promoters are telling ticketholders that if their names don't match the names on the credit cards they won't get in.

    BBC News has more.

    "What we have here is a failure to communicate."

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Led Zepplin fans with wrong CC get turned away by alshithead · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Led Zepplin held a lottery for tickets to an upcoming concert.

      They neglected to tell the winners the tickets were non-transferable."

      I seem to remember hearing that the tickets were non-transferable when I first heard that they would be available by lottery only. That was the whole idea, cut out the scalping.

      --
      I reserve the right to think for myself. Others' opinions are optional. Puppy on lap = typos...not illiteracy.
    2. Re:Led Zepplin fans with wrong CC get turned away by NoPantsJim · · Score: 5, Funny

      "What we have here is a failure to communicate."
      I believe that they really meant to say "Communication Breakdown".
    3. Re:Led Zepplin fans with wrong CC get turned away by Firethorn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My economic solution, that would also ensure that scalping is minimized would be to hold a dutch auction - everybody bids what they're willing to pay, then the tickets are all sold at the highest price that ensures a sellout.

      If that doesn't work, start up with sky-high prices, then gradually drop them until a sellout is achieved - it would minimize scalping because in order to get large numbers of tickets you'd have to buy early, at the higher price.

      Though making the tickets non-transferable works at least a little bit.

      Besides, scalpers don't always make out - I've heard of them selling tickets at half the price they paid for them on the day of the show because they just can't move them.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    4. Re:Led Zepplin fans with wrong CC get turned away by crosbie · · Score: 2, Informative

      See The Digital Art Auction, which describes such an auction. It focusses upon the case of an unlimited number of seats, but can just as easily be used for a finite ticket count.

    5. Re:Led Zepplin fans with wrong CC get turned away by Firethorn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hmm... That reads a lot like a dutch auction, just modified to be revenue maximizing when the material to be auctioned is unlimited.

      You could do that at least a bit with a regular dutch auction. If you see that selling 99 out of a 100 items would raise the price by a dollar each, say $20 to $21 dollars. The seller could place an extra 'bid' at $21, buying the last one, increasing the price from $2079 rather than $2000 for an extra profit of $79, plus having the item available.

      Still, when you're talking about a dutch auction of the magnitude a concert would have, any given seat is unlikely to make much of a price difference.

      5k seats, .01 price difference, $200 ticket, $1Million vs. $999,849.99. Better to sell all 5k seats. 10 cent difference would make it worth it, by a whole $299.90. Heck, if you do that, make the extra seats a 'reserve' for at the door ticketing, killing even more scalper potential revenue.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  10. It's worse than you think... by bluelarva · · Score: 5, Insightful

    These so called ticket brokers are actually worse than most people think. I actually had a long conversation with one of these scums. First of all, these guys don't operate small. He claimed that his operation spent over a million dollar a year just on Google AdWords advertisement campaign. That tells you the scale of his operation. He uses a network of machines with bot software to buy up as much tickets as he possibly can for sports events and concerts. The markup on those tickets are astronomical. He deals mostly with movie and sports star agents mostly to unload these tickets at shockingly high prices but those agents don't care because they are out to make their clients happy at all cost. What's sad is how he sometimes end up with bunch of unsold tickets. This creates artificial demand thus increases ticket price for everyone as well as depriving fans who want to go see these events. Whenever you see bunch of empty seats in a sold out baseball game, it's not because the fan had a change of plans or got sick. It's because these scummy ticket brokers couldn't unload them for huge profit. One of the reason why ticketmaster won't do anything about the situation is because these brokers ensure that events are sold out which works out in their favor. They don't care about actual fans getting hold of the tickets. They simply want the tickets sold.

  11. Re:Where are all the Libertarians now? by vtcodger · · Score: 2, Insightful
    ***Ayn Rand would be so disappointed.Ayn Rand would be so disappointed.***

    If I recall my Ayn Rand, high ticket prices wouldn't be a problem in a Randian paradise because artists whose artistic integrity has been transgressed would frequently blow up venues. That would, I am quite certain, discourage desire for tickets and therefore bring ticket prices down.

    An interesting and unique solution to a vexing problem.

    Note that we could achieve much the same affect by simply marking every 500th ticket with a black border and shooting the guy who buys it. Since scalpers buy many more tickets than ordinary people, we would wipe them out in short order.

    --
    You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
  12. Mod Parent Up by jbengt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Tickmaster sucks the life out of venues and acts.

  13. Re:You're lucky if it's $10 by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Unless, of course, the venue happens to be out in the burbs.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  14. ticketmaster is why I don't go to events by fotbr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Concerts, sporting events, whatever. If ticketmaster is involved, I don't go.

    I just don't like being surcharged and fee'd to death. If its going to turn out to be a $300 ticket, just price the ticket at $300. Not $150 with a $50 convenience fee, a $30 internet-order fee, a $20 online-ticket-printing fee, a $10 "you paid with a visa card" fee, a $20 "processing fee", and a $20 "fee collection surcharge".

  15. Free Market and Technology by dannym · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The bottom line is that ticket prices should be dictated by a free market. If the tickets aren't worth whatever additional value the secondary market (including scalpers) places on them, no one will buy them. If a ticket is worth that much to you, it shouldn't matter if you're buying it from a broker (e.g. TicketsNow) or a fan (e.g. StubHub). But I think if the secondary sellers are using technology, buyers should be using technology to keep the sellers in check (e.g. oyaka.com, ninjatickets.com).

  16. Re:scalpers manipulate the market by John+Hurliman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Your proposed solution might work because it makes sure the high profits go the venue/artist, not the scalpers, but it only works if you can design such a system that can keep out/identify the scalpers. These technical hurdles is what caused the problem in the first place: if Ticketwhatever made a system with all security features working as intended, then there would be much less of a problem. The same technical hurdles would need to be taken for your proposed auction system. But the reason scalpers can make a living is because they can manipulate the market. By buying up all tickets, they create an artificial scarecity which enables them to ask what the mark will bear. Selling at a lower than facevalue price is just the cost of obtaining market dominance. Undercover agents with a licence to kill scalpers would be a good solution, but just realising that intervening in a free market is contrary to the US' capitalist ideals, would be an even better solution. Then the only problem is for the venues that don't get all the profits.


    The proposed solution has nothing to do with identifying scalpers. Scalpers take advantage of market timing; they attempt to buy up as much of the ticket supply as quickly as possible and sell tickets at higher prices later. In a Dutch auction it's assumed everyone who wanted to buy a ticket has an opportunity to place a bid, and the price point is optimized based on all of the bids. Resellers wouldn't be able to win a majority of the tickets in the auction and resell them at higher prices (above what consumers were willing to bear), they could only sell to people who missed the auction or mis-judged their bids or have more disposable income later on.

    The idea that resellers would sell at lower then face value price to obtain market dominance doesn't make any sense... there is an infinite supply of future events and the distribution costs for tickets is extremely low. Are you suggesting that Ticketmaster would be put out of business by resellers that originally bought the tickets from Ticketmaster? The "US capitalist ideals" you talk about are making the market efficient in the best way possible by optimizing profit, and if that means using a different market style like a Dutch auction then that more power to them. It is not intervening in any definition of the word.

    Disclaimer: I'm not saying a Dutch auction is definitely the best answer, there are a lot of open questions there. I don't think your reply had any valid rebuttals though.
  17. Here is where the money is! by maillemaker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think this is very interesting. It tells us a few things:

    1) It tells me that ticket prices are, basically, under-priced. If scalpers are buying up the tickets and selling them for 10 times the face value, then Tickemaster should be selling those tickets at ten times what they are currently selling them for.

    2) It tells me there is a lot of money in live performances. If I were a performer, I would capitalize on this by putting on 15 shows in a city instead of 5 (or however many I could continue to sell out) before moving on to the next city. While digital music is becoming worthless, clearly some live performances are skyrocketing in value.

    3) It tells me that Ticketmaster needs to work on developing technology that can limit the number of tickets that can be purchased by any given entity or individual.

    --
    A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.