Slashdot Mirror


Ohio Official Docked Vacation Time For Stolen Tape

Lucas123 writes "The missing tape, stolen from an intern's car, contained data on all 64,467 state employees, 19,388 former employees and 47,245 Ohio taxpayers. The state believes the incident will cost them $3 million. So after four months of deliberation, the Ohio Department of Administrative Services announced today that they decided to take a week's vacation away from Jerry Miller, their payroll team leader and the guy in charge of the missing data."

53 of 218 comments (clear)

  1. So his salary must be... by patman600 · · Score: 5, Funny

    So, if this cost them $3 million, and they took a week's vacation away, his yearly salary must be $156 million. I think I know where I should be looking for a job now.

    1. Re:So his salary must be... by User+956 · · Score: 2, Funny

      So, if this cost them $3 million, and they took a week's vacation away, his yearly salary must be $156 million. I think I know where I should be looking for a job now.

      I wouldn't be so sure. It took them four months of deliberation to make that determination. From that, I'm guessing they're using some kind of magic-8-ball-fueled-fractal-algorithm to come up with these figures, which means you very well could end up earning a salary in turkish lire, if you're not careful.

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    2. Re:So his salary must be... by MrMr · · Score: 2, Informative
    3. Re:So his salary must be... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 5, Funny

      which means you very well could end up earning a salary in turkish lire, if you're not careful

      Or worse, US Dollars...

    4. Re:So his salary must be... by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't know [flies up in the air] Aaaaaargh!

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    5. Re:So his salary must be... by ragefan · · Score: 3, Funny

      The New Turkish Lira or the Old Turkish Lira? :P That's nobody's business but the Turks!
  2. Isn't.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Isn't the company responsible for negligence carried out by an employee in the course of his duties...

    1. Re:Isn't.. by baileydau · · Score: 5, Informative

      Isn't the company responsible for negligence carried out by an employee in the course of his duties...


      Yes they are ... That is with respect to any external parties that may have been harmed.

      Even though the company is liable for any negligence, they have the option of internal sanctions against any negligent employee.

      That's why he only got docked 1 weeks holiday, not the entire $3M
      --
      Ever stop to think ... and forget to start again?
  3. The guy's damn lucky. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Imagine what would have happened to him if he'd been busted sharing a couple of dozen copyrighted songs online. Probably would've had his sick-leave cancelled too.

    1. Re:The guy's damn lucky. by BVis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hmm.

      Allow personal information on tens of thousands of people to get out due to massive incompetence, costing the state millions and potentially ruining the credit of everyone whose info was on the tape, lose a weeks' vacation.

      Share music online at no cost of any sort to the copyright holders, and then get railroaded through an ignorant and corrupt legal system, and get fined several times your yearly salary.

      Is Canada hiring?

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
  4. Is that all they are going to do? by MadJo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Take away 1 week of vacation time?
    If I screw up that bad at my work, I'd be facing a discharge...

    1. Re:Is that all they are going to do? by ritesonline · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What more do you want?

      Sounds like the guy's a long timer who was doing his job and now has to carry the can to protect his pension.

      From the article: "The tape was pilfered in June from the car of an intern responsible for carrying data used by the Ohio state government's computer systems...described Miller as a "stellar longtime DAS employee" and said he has been forthright in acknowledging his role in the "management glitch" pertaining to the stolen backup tape."

      This wasn't some guy who took a company laptop home to play games, it was his responsibility and no extra security was provided for him to do his job. Would you like everyone else robbed at work to forfeit leave or be sacked? The "management glitch" is probably that his bosses wouldn't stump up for secure transport of the tapes.

    2. Re:Is that all they are going to do? by bronney · · Score: 2, Funny

      If I screw up that bad at my work, I'd also be facing a discharge...

    3. Re:Is that all they are going to do? by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You, me, pretty much everyone in the private sector, I'd say.

      But hey, that guy just lost data, not something important. Considering the way our other officials hand out our data like candy, that blunder is just a nuisance because, well, the general population got to know about it. So they had to do something about it.

      Think Sony and rootkit.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Is that all they are going to do? by ritesonline · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you've got problems with a discharge then you should probably change your medication.

    5. Re:Is that all they are going to do? by HeWhoMustNotBeNamed · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I worked in the same division as Jerry years ago. At the time he was silo'd (not his choice) in a $40 million failed attempt to replace the cobol-assembler payroll system with an "off the shelf" Dunn & Bradstreet mainframe product. The project was called HRMS. It went on for something like 18 years. Each year the folks several positions above Jerry kept pushing for more funding to get it completed. For 15 years they were "just a few more months" away from completion. Along came Y2K and in mid 1998, the external auditors finally got the message above to the cabinet that come 2000 the payroll system would cease to function. Due to HRMS always being 6 months from completion, any budget that was tied to maintenance of the cobol system got sucked away into the HRMS void. Jerry would often just smile to our questions about the status of the HRMS, he wanted to say what wasn't right about it, but kept quiet to keep his job.

      So, in 1998 with backs up against the wall and through some heroic effort on the part of Bob Cruse's staff, the cobol system was given enough resources including myself to remediate the system.

      You would think that in 2000 they would have pulled the plug; nope, and that's a reason I left. Instead it was 2001 or 2002 that they finally called HRMS suck cost. Jerry had fewer options being a state life'r; to get his pension he needed to stay for 30 yrs.

      Immediately following the disolution of HRMS, they took the same architects involved in HRMS and tossed in additional incompitent pointy hairs and created the OAKS project.

      My former boss was added to the group and one of his backup strategies was to take our network backs home on tape. Sound familiar? We secretly revolted and instead sent them to another state office.

      That is what I know about Jerry and now I'm going to guess and say this went above Jerry and he's taking the fall.

    6. Re:Is that all they are going to do? by buckeyeguy · · Score: 3, Interesting
      So it says he's a "payroll team lead", which seems to hint that he's still a bargaining unit (read: union) employee and not management. That would explain the odd-sounding penalty; iirc, firing a bargaining unit employee pretty much took an act of god to do.


      --> (Was a State employee for 10 years; knew 2 people who were fired in that time.)

      --
      I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
    7. Re:Is that all they are going to do? by Sloppy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If I screw up that bad at my work, I'd be facing a discharge...

      Yeah, that's probably the usual case.

      But you're thinking in terms of an employee. Imagine you're a manager (I mean Jerry Miller's boss, not Jerry Miller the manager of the intern). One of your people just did something horribly destructive. Something has to be done, but think: what is there to gain by firing him? Miller has already soiled his pants and he's probably not going to make the same mistake again.

      The question you face is, was this just a one-time fuck up, or is the guy systematically incompetent so he really just can't be trusted to do things right? In the second case, yeah, fire him. Fire anyone else too, whether they've fucked up yet or not, if you think they're going to do dumb/destructive things. But what about the first case?

      How did this fuck up really happen?

      I wouldn't just assume that firing the guy, is the smartest thing to do.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  5. I bet those judging him by rolfwind · · Score: 4, Insightful

    would feel a bit differently if they are one of those who will get victimized (ID theft for one) as a consequence of this slip up. It may yet happen.

    1. Re:I bet those judging him by diggsIt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My information was on that tape, and yes I do feel differently about it. The State of Ohio has provided a credit authorization service for one year. After that, I'll have to pay for it. It won't be long before almost everyone is compromised. The more the better as far as I'm concerned. Congress will only take appropriate action when enough people have been burned. I should be able to freeze my credit without paying for the priveledge. The Credit Industry makes the rules. Congress takes their money and looks the other way. State government workers shouldn't be allowed to have computers. They're just too damn stupid and/or lazy.

      --
      Miles Ran the Voodoo Down
  6. Wrong punishment by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Tired and stressed people make more mistakes. Without vacation he will make more mistakes.

    1. Re:Wrong punishment by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Without vacation he will make more mistakes

      It's okay. He's from the government.

    2. Re:Wrong punishment by mgblst · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, but this guy isn't making mistakes because he is tired or stressed. His problem is pure incompetence. It is not like he can be more incompetent, because he didn't get enough rest.

      This is a joke, and a big problem in our society. Incompetence is rarely punished, something that you see all the time in the political world.

    3. Re:Wrong punishment by Durrok · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My father works for Heidelberg (Big printing press company) and does copier repair. When he installs a new copier at a government facility he has to be sure to arrange it so he is done before noon because the managers at the site will usually tell him "Oh it's after lunch, our employees are tired. Come back tomorrow." Everyone is usually playing solitaire or hanging out by the water cooler. You wonder why government projects take so long and usually go over budget..

      --
      I keep telling myself I'm not the desperate type.
    4. Re:Wrong punishment by MMC+Monster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This guy didn't make a mistake at all. He was following orders. The ones that made the mistake were the ones that told him to take the tapes home.

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    5. Re:Wrong punishment by v1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Without more information it's hard to say exactly what happened. I could just picture this guy having "transport backup tape to offsite storage on your way from home" as part of his job duties. I used to do that for a company I worked for. I threw the tapes in my passenger seat and drove to the other location and dropped them off at the other office on my way home.

      I could REALLY see how if I, say, stopped at a gas station on the way between the two to get gas and a galon of milk as I do sometimes on my way home. I leave the truck locked even when walking into the quick-e-mart for a minute to get the milk and pay for the gas, but even with that it's possible someone could break into my truck and steal anything that was convenient for a "smash and grab". There's nothing else in my truck that's not nailed down that would make an attractive item to quick grab, so those tapes would probably get snatched for lack of anything else to show for the theft.

      I would not want major sanctions for being a victim of that theft, and arguably there's not much more you could have expected of me.

      Do not hold the peon responsible for the company's unwillingness to provide appropriate security and to place a potentially very big onus on one lone employee, in the interest of saving a few bucks. VERY few businesses are willing to provide adequate protection under such circumstances. Mostly only those that are required to do so by law or agreement. (banks, companies handling credit card numbers, etc)

      Now in such a situation, had I not even bothred to lock the truck, that doesn't make the theft any more legal, and unless there were some company policies in place saying "employees transporting backup tapes must leave their vehicle secured whenever unattended" (which until this happens once, you can bet the policy does not exist) then even in that case the employee should bear no additional responsibility,

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  7. Re:What's that in private sector terms? by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 4, Informative

    Depends on on your level in the organization. If you do this and you're just a peon, you get fired. If you do this and you're the CEO, then a department gets axed and bunch of peons get fired, you retire with a several million dollar golden parachute and stock options.

    --
    This space available.
  8. Let's torture him next! by suv4x4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But of course, it's all about the revenge. Water droplets? Arm/leg twister? Acid (.. music)? Tazers! It sure will help with the lost records!

    From personal experience, trying to do more work and cut off your vacation is the most sure-fire way to bring your work quality and productivity down.

    Are they trying to set him up to lose another tape?

  9. Gee. by skulgnome · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wonder how much those four months of deliberation cost them. All that work just for some petty punishment. (of course you yanks only get like six days of paid vacation a year, so maybe it's harsher from your perspective, lol.)

    1. Re:Gee. by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wonder how much those four months of deliberation cost them. Probably not very much.
      If you've any experience with bureaucracy, when they say stuff like "4 months" they really mean "we took 4 months to schedule the 1~3 meetings required to reach a decision."

      All that work just for some petty punishment. Like I said, they probably didn't do much work. For all you know, they took 4 months just to let the original issue fade so that their 'punishment' wouldn't get pulled into the national news.

      I'd look at the "petty punishment" as something they felt compelled to do, because to do otherwise would be to admit outright that the security around their data handling is seriously broken. Punishing the employee allows them to save face by spreading the blame around.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
  10. $3 million? by Palpitations · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Okay, so the state thinks it will cost them $3 million. That's all well and good, but the real damages from this security breach will likely be much, much greater.

    We're talking about personal information for 131,100 people here. ID theft being all the rage these days, and assuming that all these people are screwed, $3,000,000 comes out to just over $22 a person.

    I doubt that every last person getting targetted will be the case... And I have no idea what the average ID theft victim ends up losing (I imagine that's hard to quantify - with direct losses, the time and money spent repairing the damage, and the impact on your credit history). Even so, I think a lowball estimate would be 25% of these people getting cheated out of an average of $3,000 or so. That right there is a little over $98 million.

    Now then, I'm the first to admit that I could very well be grossly overestimating things... But really, come on now - a weeks vacation for what could potentially cost the state and it's citizens over a hundred million dollars? Hell, if I could get away with that kind of misconduct with penalties like that, I might just "steal" that tape from myself.

  11. Some quick considerations... by physicsphairy · · Score: 5, Insightful
    First of all, you can't fine him "$3 million", (a) because he couldn't pay it, (b) because then you probably have to pay people close to that amount just to convince them the financial risk of the job was worth taking.

    Also, it's evident it wasn't 100% on him. The data was stolen from an intern's car. He bears the indirect culpability of not encrypting it, not backing it, trusting the intern, whatever. It's natural to feel that "heads should roll" but why should the onus of all this fall necessarily on him? (Well, maybe it all should--I'm just going off the blurb in the summary.)

    On the other side of it, a week's vacation time is ridiculous, whether or not he's at fault. If he is, well, there should be a real punishment. If he's not, it's fairly idiotic to slap him around just for the show of doing so.

    And how much did the four-month long investigation cost? If it was more than a week of this guy's vacation time... yeah, well, that was another win for the taxpayers, wasn't it?

    The way it should have worked is that there should have been a clearly defined set of rules, a clearly defined set of responsibilities, and a clearly defined set of repercussions. When employee X neglected responsibility Y, he should have already been aware that Z would be the punishment, and Z should have been what happened immediately afterward. You might need a four month investigation to find the harddrive thief, but you shouldn't need more than a week to handle violations of internal policies.

  12. Smells bad by ladybugfi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From my experience people who do grossly inappropriate things get usually kicked out of the company. If these two get just this minor punishment it might be because the organization did not have clear enough policies and procedures for storing and handling the data. If there are no rules or employees do not know them, people can not be held accountable for any wrongdoing. If this is the case, even this vacation time punishment is too severe.

    On the other hand, maybe the organization subscribes to the principle of giving people a second chance.

  13. Re:What's that in private sector terms? by August_zero · · Score: 2, Funny

    The terrible truth is, that after the data was lost, they were not sure how much vacation time anyone still had but they were pretty sure he had a lot of it so he was probably burned.

    That will teach him next time.

    --
    On Wall Street they say "buy low, sell high" On the pad we say, "buy high, sell high" Isn't that somehow better?
  14. Mistake by pubjames · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The guy made a mistake. We don't know him or the situation. He may be otherwise great at his job.

    What's all this crap about his punishment should match the cost of the mistake rubbish?

    If a doctor makes a mistake and a patient dies, do we kill the doctor?

  15. After 4 hours of deliberation... by Jtheletter · · Score: 2, Funny

    Mr. Miller announced "Well, fuck it," and decide to revoke all Payroll DB access rights, delete the tables and go on "permanent" vacation from the job. Problem solved!

    On a more serious note.... what happened to the intern?

    --
    -- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --
    1. Re:After 4 hours of deliberation... by pbemfun · · Score: 3, Informative

      The intern was fired a few weeks after this happened. As was the intern's immediate supervisor and the supervisor's manager.

  16. Re:A week? by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes, very true, indeed. Americans pay more tax - as measured in days of labor - than almost any other nation on the planet. A significant portion of this tax goes to 'Keeping the world safe from '.

    Remember that the next time some Western European slags off the Yanks within earshot. They paid for the reconstruction of most of the Western European economies after WWII, and footed the bill for keeping the Soviets out during the Cold War.

    This same thing happened in Japan, don't forget.

    So, when they do get their f*&#ing measly 10 days of annual vacation, they certainly don't want to spend at least two of them traveling to/from a foreign country, only to be insulted for their selflessness. I agree it's sad that Americans simply don't travel as much as many other nations do, and yes, this certainly is a significant cause of American ignorance of the rest of the world. Unfortunately, it is simply not the fault of the 'average' American that this is the case.

  17. I received the "We lost your data" letter ... by ZenOfBelan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I recieved one of those lovely "We lost your data" letters ... 2 months after the incident. So, as one of the individuals who was personally impacted by this, I'd like to say a few things:

    1) Their IT staff is incompetent. In my department, we ship over 50TB a week to our DR facility in England. We have had instances where tapes were lost in transit (thanks FedEx!) but the data was encrypted. No harm, no foul. That being said, their idea of sending tapes offsite was to put it in the back of an intern's car. GENIUS!

    2) This petty hand-slaping is absurd. Yes, I want the idiot fired and replaced by someone who gives a damn about data management, security, and data classification.

    3) 2 months to contact people who were on the tapes?! FFS!

    4) Their incident handling in the media was that the criminals would need "specialized knowledge and tools" to extract the information. It says what kind of tape it is right on the case! That, and a little Google go a long way. Stop feeding the public a line of BS and own up to the fact that it's really not that hard to get the data off the tape.

    There are others, but those are the ones that are pissing me off at the moment.

  18. What are you going to do next... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Announcer: "Jerry Miller, you just caused the loss of $3 million for the state of Ohio, and negatively impacted the lives of more than 100,000 people. What are you going to do next?"

    Miller: "I am apparently NOT going to Disney World."

  19. Re:The guy's Union Boss says... by Dragonslicer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Looks like the Union is staffing IT security now. Who was doing it before, the Confederacy?
  20. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Remember that the next time some Western European slags off the Yanks within earshot. They paid for the reconstruction of most of the Western European economies after WWII, and footed the bill for keeping the Soviets out during the Cold War. I'm not going to criticise the Americans for doing that, but at the same time don't tell me that there wasn't a very large element of self-interest there. Are you seriously suggesting that the Americans would have been happy with a Soviet-dominated Western Europe? Would they heck.

    And it's been argued that much of America's post-war prosperity was due to the rebuilding of- and trading with- rebuilt economies. Had Europe fallen into economic disrepair, that certainly would have made it more likely to fall under Soviet influence, and again, become a threat to the US.

    So we both won in this case. I think America's actions in the post-war era were as much enlightened self-interest as altruism, and nothing wrong with that- just don't get too sanctimonious about it.

    As for "'keeping the world safe from insert dictator/regime/dogma here'" in a modern context, were you thinking of the war in Iraq?
  21. Turkish Millionaire by Night+Goat · · Score: 2, Funny

    No wonder they haven't done "Who Wants To Be A Turkish Millionaire" on Howard Stern lately!

  22. Re:A week? by caluml · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Also, a little known fact - the UK has only just (in the last year or 2) paid off the debt that they had with the US. Apparently, the US offered to help, as long as the UK paid all their troop costs, fuel costs, etc. The UK has been paying it off slowly since 1945, although the US let us off the interest. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6215847.stm

  23. I'm Impressed by sskinnider · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It is rare that a person accepts responsibility in the private sector, it is even more rare that they accept it in the civil service. It goes to show that this man has a decent moral character.

  24. Re:A week? by evilviper · · Score: 4, Interesting

    No wonder you guys never get a chance to leave the US and see what the rest of the world is about.

    How frequently do your vacations include flying across an ocean? If your trip is any shorter, it isn't at all equivalent to leaving the US.

    The real reason many people never leave the USA is because it's simply a huge place, spanning a large continent. Also, everything most people could want to see in their lifetime can be found inside the US. Here in the west, in a day I can drive from my house, to the tallest mountain in the contiguous US (4421m, Mt Whitney), past the oldest living organism (Methuselah tree) on earth, through a forest with the tallest trees on earth (Sequoia), to the lowest point on the content, right through the area with the highest recorded temperature on the planet, then, for good measure, round off the day by visiting The Grand Canyon.
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  25. But by KKlaus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    He didn't get fired, and if you're upset that he didn't get fired, consider the situation from the point of view of someone who doesn't hate managers on principle and is interested more in the health of the company. Why get rid of a perfectly good executive when you don't have to? It's easy to get the department back in working order if you're replacing a peon, but not if you are replacing the department head. So the intern is toast, but the guy 3 levels above him stays because it's better for the company that way. It's not like anyone should expect the business world to be fair in the first place (else why does my boss get payed so much more than me?), so why are you surprised?

    --
    Relax I just want some peanuts.
    1. Re:But by Duhavid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But if the source of the error was the CEO, the firing the
      peons does nothing good for the company. The problem still
      exists. And the health of the company took a dip, potentially,
      as the workers fired might have been competent, the incompetent
      is still there, and the remaining workers will see this, and
      they usually are not fooled, and will be demoralized, lowering
      their productivity temporarily, and the best of the people there
      will be more likely to move to another company.

      Has nothing to do with hating managers "on principal". Has nothing
      to do with fair.

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
  26. You are an outlier by blueZ3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you're a hard-working go-getter in the public sector, more power to you. There definitely are some folks in government who are hard working. My wife, when she worked for the city, was one of them. But it's not the banker's hours or some nefarious "agenda" of pundits that drives public opinion.

    The real issue is that the perception the public has isn't drawn from the class of "all government workers.". The public's perception is based on things like the California DMV offices, where dozens of citizens stand in long lines while about 50% of the "workers" behind the counters engage in banter, sit idly staring off into space, and generally appear to be doing nothing much; or the city clerk's office, where the belligerent receptionist can barely contain her indignation that you've interrupted her game of Solitaire to tell her you've arrived for an appointment; or county road workers, who are frequently seen in groups of seven or eight, where one guy is digging and the rest are all leaning on shovels/brooms, and chatting on cell phones; or the folks who are so hidebound that they can't imagine a solution to a problem that hasn't been carefully documented in the official handbook; and on, and on, and on.

    Until all the citizen-visible positions in government are filled by hardworking, customer-service oriented folks who take their breaks out of site of the waiting area (an outcome so unlikely as to be impossible) the perception isn't going to change.

    --
    Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
  27. Re:A week? by smeaggie · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, and if you've done six impossible things this morning, why not round it off with breakfast at Milliways, the Restaurant at the End of the Universe?

  28. Re:A week? by m50d · · Score: 2, Funny
    well how about i DRIVE my way down to an area that had living viable, highly evolved cultures years before any European country did...... I'll see you in Costa Rica, Honduras, and Mexico.

    All of which involve leaving the US, you tool.

    --
    I am trolling
  29. Re:A week? by fullmetal55 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, I can do a lot of that, but a lot of it doesn't interest me. I can visit the Rockies, go see the columbia ice fields, relax in hotsprings, go to the top of a mountain, all within a days drive of me too, but I'd rather go on a vacation where I can see really old buildings (over 300 years old), visit new cultures, experience new foods, see the world from a different viewpoint. I've seen the natural wonders my fine country (Canada) has to offer, and loved them, but I also want to see other places, and learn other cultures. there's only so much sightseeing you can do.

  30. Re:A week? by fullmetal55 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Where did I ridicule anyone? please let me know. or is it that i dared to disagree with you, if so why does stating my differing opinion injure you so much? there was nothing I said that was worthy of being attacked for. and our "strange and exotic foods" are all pretty much from other places, we don't really have a national cuisine. And the ones that generally cause the "midnight dash" are typically US corporate food chain restaurants. (McFood)

    And where did Spring Break and wet t-shirt contests come in? I never said Canada was a bastion of ancient architecture and culture, I said I like to go to places where I can discover new cultures... I'm already here, I know Canada's culture. But I want to experience the culture of Japan, Thailand, Germany, Italy, France, England, Sweden, Egypt, etc. So some people (read you) don't want to, I'm merely stating that there's other reasons people take vacations than siteseeing, at least for some people. Don't get in my face because I disagree with you. Ignoring other cultures doesn't make you better, it doesn't make you worse. It makes you different, and that's all i'm saying. you're different than me. Not better, Not worse. Different. this isn't a flame, this is merely statements. nothing even remotely inflamitory i don't think, I tried really hard. especially since my talking about what I like to do for vacations is considered ridiculing others, quote me if you want, but I didn't say anything to ridicule you or anyone else on their choice of vacation. just letting you know that there are more than one reason for trips.