Slashdot Mirror


Vista Runs Out of Memory While Copying Files

ta bu shi da yu writes "It appears that, incredibly, Vista can run out of memory while copying files. ZDNet is reporting that not only does it run out of memory after copying 16,400+ files, but that 'often there is little indication that file copy operations haven't completed correctly.' Apparently a fix was scheduled for SP1 but didn't make it; there is a hotfix that you must request."

12 of 661 comments (clear)

  1. Billy G says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    16k files should be enough for everybody.

  2. Welcome to Windows Vista by TJ_Phazerhacki · · Score: 5, Funny

    At the end, there will be free therapy. And Cake!

    --
    Physics is nothing like religion. If it was, we'd have an easier time trying to raise money!
  3. Re:Maybe this stems from... by gbulmash · · Score: 5, Funny

    Isn't it a little odd that if you strip off the first and last digits of the number "16,400", it's 640, as in 'no one needs more than 640k"?

  4. No more going back to XP? by dtouchet · · Score: 5, Funny

    M$ is scared that people will try to copy their documents to another computer before reverting back to XP. Smart, very smart Micro$oft! On a tech note, what kind of number is 14,600? I would have thought 16,384 would be better.

    --
    void r() { printf("recursion is "); r(); }
  5. It's because by zsouthboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    they can only send 16,000 files to the RIAA and MPAA to check, at once.

  6. Re:Maybe this stems from... by roman_mir · · Score: 5, Funny

    and then you take the 640, divide by 2, get 320, remove the last 0, and get 32, the reverse of 23.

    Then you multiply 23 by 30, get 690, take 42, reverse it to 24 and subtruct this from 690. You get 666.

    What does that tell you? Ha? Ha?

  7. Re:Maybe this stems from... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 5, Funny

    What does that tell you? Ha? Ha?

    You've got too much time on your hands?

    --
    "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  8. Re:Actual info... by truthsearch · · Score: 5, Funny

    only files with altnerate data streams trigger the leak

    Well that's what you get for crossing the streams. Egon warned us. Kaspersky's risking total protonic reversal. I guess they were fuzzy on the whole good/bad thing.

  9. Oh quit whining by downix · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is a minor problem, absolutely rare event, occurs with next to no regu...

    **OUT OF MEMORY ERROR, SYSTEM HALT**

    --
    Karma Whoring for Fun and Profit.
  10. Re:Maybe this stems from... by nomadic · · Score: 5, Funny

    Actually, it's more like 90 / 90000, but you're only a few orders of magnitude off.

    Not necessarily his fault, maybe he used Excel to calculate it...

  11. Not really that simple in Vista... by kwabbles · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's not a simple operation. Think about how a file copy works within Vista:

    1. The file is opened.
    2. The file is scanned for viruses.
    3. The file is scanned for adware.
    4. The file is scanned for DRM violations.
    5. The user is asked if they're really sure they want to copy the file.
    6. The user is asked again if they're sure they want to copy it.
    7. The OS makes a judgement on how long it will take to copy so it can update the pretty stats in the gui.
    8. Lots of flashy graphics and widgets are loaded to show you a pretty animation while you wait.
    9. The file is copied.
    10. The destination file is verified that it is intact.
    11. The destination file is scanned for viruses.
    12. The destination file is scanned for adware.
    13. The destination file is scanned for DRM violations.
    14. The file is successfully copied.

    Hell - I'm surprised their OS can even handle copying 1,600 files, let alone 16,000.

    --
    Just disrupt the deflector shield with a tachyon burst.
  12. Re:Maybe this stems from... by Nosklo · · Score: 5, Funny

    why the heck does Windows need to scan directories to be deleted before deleting them is beyond me (...) Same thing for copying, Windows wastes time scanning the source directory for no apparent reason since it won't tell you you have insufficient disk space to complete the operation The scan is to know beforehand the size and number of files before copy/delete operation, so windows can make a <sarcasm>VERY RELIABLE</sarcasm> progress bar, with a <sarcasm>VERY RELIABLE</sarcasm> estimated time that <sarcasm>ALWAYS</sarcasm> measures correctly the time left for the operation to complete.
    --
    find -name "*base*" -exec chown us {} \; ; ln -s /dev/zero /dev/chance ; make time