Slashdot Mirror


'I Was a Hacker for the MPAA'

Wired has up an article with a man named Robert Anderson, who was recruited by the MPAA in 2005 to inform on people in the BitTorrent community. In a tell-all interview with the site, Anderson explains how the powerful media organization encouraged him to obtain the information they were looking for: "According to Anderson, the MPAA told him: 'We would need somebody like you. We would give you a nice paying job, a house, a car, anything you needed.... if you save Hollywood for us you can become rich and powerful.' In 2005, the MPAA paid Anderson $15,000 for inside information about TorrentSpy -- information at the heart of a copyright-infringement lawsuit brought by the MPAA against TorrentSpy of Los Angeles. The material is also the subject of a wiretapping countersuit against the MPAA brought by TorrentSpy's founder, Justin Bunnell, who alleges the information was obtained illegally."

17 of 385 comments (clear)

  1. obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mister Anderson...

    1. Re:obligatory by im+just+cannonfodder · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This maybe a silly question but isn't hacking illegal in the usa as part of GW,Bush's anti terror laws? If this is the case shouldn't the mpaa members all now be under investigation by the cia/fbi?

    2. Re:obligatory by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Informative
      Yes. 1030. Fraud and related activity in connection with computers states that:

      [Anyone who] ...knowingly and with intent to defraud, accesses a protected computer without authorization, or exceeds authorized access, and by means of such conduct furthers the intended fraud and obtains anything of value, unless the object of the fraud and the thing obtained consists only of the use of the computer and the value of such use is not more than $5,000 in any 1-year period; The term "protected computer" is defined as:

      (B) which is used in interstate or foreign commerce or communication, including a computer located outside the United States that is used in a manner that affects interstate or foreign commerce or communication of the United States; (i) the offense was committed for purposes of commercial advantage or private financial gain;

      (ii) the offense was committed in furtherance of any criminal or tortious act in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States or of any State Hello, Mr. Federal Prosecutor? Where are you?
    3. Re:obligatory by ResidntGeek · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I want you to read this following line very carefully:

      SHUT UP.

      You're fighting a battle which was stupid even before it was lost, 10 years ago. To the general population, when Joey Pimpleface finds some code on the internet that lets him sniff out some doofus's password, that is hacking. That makes it the case, whether you like it or not. You're never, ever going to realign the definition of the term, not even if you did more than post on slashdot about it (which you won't). Do what you do with every other word in the damn language, and use it the same way everyone else does. Suddenly, magically, you'll find you can communicate with other lifeforms! Imagine that!

      By the way,

      Who would have thought that some day we would actually be respected, to the point that the jocks and cheerleaders would actually try to pass themselves off as us?
      You're so naive I almost hate to burst your bubble on that one, but no. Leaving aside your high-school perception of the world, the thing that set nerds and geeks apart is lack of social skills. I can assure you "jocks and cheerleaders", as you so eloquently put it, do not try to imitate an inability to socialize. Geeks and nerds are respected once they learn how to socialize, to become like the "jocks and cheerleaders" in that sense.
      --
      ResidntGeek
    4. Re:obligatory by Independent+Voter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, multiple personality disorder is a form of schizophrenia. So, people who say that those with multiple personality disorder have schizophrenia, they're not wrong, just inexact.

      I started hacking and cracking in 1983, way before it was "cool". At the time, according to me and my friends who were much better hackers and crackers than I was (including one Pentagon computer hacker who eventually got caught), cracking is a subform of hacking.

      Language evolves and meanings change. Happens every year with lots of words. During the transition, it creates confusion, but then the new meaning takes over and settles in and communication continues. take "hacking", for example. It used to just mean "beating something with a sharp object"...

  2. Wow. Dark Side ahoy! by meringuoid · · Score: 5, Funny
    ...if you save Hollywood for us you can become rich and powerful.

    "...and we will rule the Galaxy together!"

    "Noooooooooooo!"

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  3. I'm glad that I no longer consume mass media. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    After reading about crap like this, I'm happy that I no longer consume the shit spewed forth by the mass media. Just over two years ago I sold my TV and DVD player, gave away the DVDs and CDs I had to relatives and friends. Since then I haven't watched TV, watched a movie (on disc or in the theater), listened to mainstream music, or otherwise involved myself with their product.

    Instead of buying mainstream CDs, I go listen to local bands play at a variety of pubs and other venues, and buy directly from them if I like what I hear. The local theater productions are often far better than the latest Bruce Willis shitflick out of Hollywood. Instead of watching TV, I go biking, rockclimbing, and I also play recreational badminton.

    So I'm glad to say that my funding of this sort of bullshit has been minimal, if at all. I urge more people to take a path similar to the one that I've chosen. You'll be far better off, both in terms of the entertainment you do experience, the money you save, and the fact that you're not funding the mainstream media in any way.

    1. Re:I'm glad that I no longer consume mass media. by DanielJosphXhan · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wow. But do you use your x-ray vision and power of flight for the good of humanity?

      --
      [ think ]
    2. Re:I'm glad that I no longer consume mass media. by Choad+Namath · · Score: 5, Funny

      I also play recreational badminton.
      So was it this line, or your overwhelming smugness that caused you to comment anonymously?
  4. More like a cracker with no brains by WindBourne · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If they would give him anything, and he only got 15K?????? What an idiot.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:More like a cracker with no brains by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think you guys are on to something. They offer him riches and power and 15k is what he settles for.

      Selling your soul is one thing, but selling it cheap is unconscionable.

      Remember, though, when it comes to the buying and selling of souls: You get what you pay for.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:More like a cracker with no brains by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 5, Funny

      I read that as they promised him anything.

      He probably asked for $10 million and they probably agreed. After deduxcting various ancilliary expenses, office rental, studio time, roadies, electrical power factor multiplier, candy bars, in office Jolt delivery, the deposit on his office key, and various other miscellaneous Usual & Customary Fees, and taxes, his check was about $15k.

      --
      "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
  5. Hm by Kaitnieks · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If this is really true, it must mean that MPAA seriously believe they can close illegal interweb media distribution channels. Either they underestimate scale of the problem or overestimate their own power and influence, in any case they live in a dream world.

  6. "Didn't know"? Right. by MoonFog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The MPAA does not dispute it paid Anderson for the sensitive information, but insists that it had no idea that Anderson stole the data. "The MPAA obtains information from third parties only if it believes the evidence has been collected legally," says MPAA spokeswoman Elizabeth Kaltman.

    Essentially, the MPAA said "we will give you anything if you rat these people out and obtain evidence for us", yet "didn't know" he was doing it illegally? Please, just shows how desperate they can be and what kind of morale these people have.

    1. Re:"Didn't know"? Right. by gsslay · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Is there not something deliciously ironic about one set of criminals complaining about the illegal, immoral activities of another?

      Actually, the situation is just a bit too cloying for my tastes.

  7. Mr. Anderson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Tell me, Mr. Anderson, what good is a 100mbps connection when you are unable to share?

  8. The article misspoke . . . by Nebuul · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's pretty clearly obvious that they did not give him $15,000. What they ACTUALLY did was give him a free song download *valued at $15,000*

    Jesus, please read the article before writing summaries!