So Nissan just needs to come up with a new version of the Leaf that has the same battery capacity but sells for $10k and comes with a 12-year battery warranty? I can't wait!
The hardware may be getting out there for accepting payments, but as far as using your phone to pay, in the US the cell phone carriers are doing everything they can to screw things up for everyone. I bought a phone with NFC and foolishly assumed that I'd be able to use Google Wallet with it. I didn't realize that most of the major carriers (pretty much everyone but Sprint) are working on their own so-far stillborn alternative (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isis_%28mobile_payment_system%29), so they don't allow Google Wallet to function.
I never thought about the fact that Thinkpads don't scream "steal me!" until my ex-girlfriend's apartment was burglarized about 5 years ago. The idiot thief took a cheap, shiny looking Acer laptop and left behind two X-series Thinkpads that were sitting out in the open on a coffee table.
So the idea is that everyone will fly into the US and then take a boat or helicopter to the ship? You're still going to have to go through US customs when you enter the country and at least get at least a tourist visa for whatever amount of time you're on US soil, and then go through again to leave for the "love boat" to avoid having your visa expire. Of course that might not be such a hassle compared to getting a work visa, but it's not like you can just go straight to this place without dealing with customs.
If the information on a pre-RFID passport is sufficient for international travel -- which it presumably is, since I and millions of others still travel with them -- then an RFID-equipped passport with a non-functioning RFID chip that hasn't been otherwise defaced also has enough information. You could make the case that he should be prevented from traveling if it was obviously intentionally damaged, but it's certainly not lacking any necessary photographic or other identifying information if it's just the RFID chip that's damaged.
Actually, the *entire* rail thing is a fucking joke. It's ridiculously expensive and isn't all that fast. It does have to, you know, make plenty of stops. It's essentially more corporate welfare for specific companies. Americans like to talk about "high speed bullet trains", because it makes them feel all sophisticated and European, but they have no fucking clue what's really supposedly so great about it.
Our *current* rail system does suck, which is the entire point of building a new high-speed rail system. We like to talk about it because if it actually ever happens, it will be better than flying for a lot of domestic travel: more legroom, power outlets, not having to show up 2 hours before departure, the ability to use mobile data plans for the majority of the trip, etc.
Will this prevent Adobe from installing their mongoloidish "Download Manager" Add-on that's set up to start every time you open a new window instead of just running when you start your browser?
You're not missing anything. If Slashdot is "news for nerds," Digg is "news for people who think they're nerds just because they know how to use the internet."
I hate to resort to calling the EPA malicious, because I want to believe that they think that what they are doing is right, but, seriously, that's the only alternative. They certainly aren't trying to _actually_ clean up the air, since worse offenders than the USA already exist and won't be affected by this law at all.
Come the fuck on. You cannot honestly believe that the US government, which depends on tax revenue from American businesses and their employees, would intentionally handicap said businesses? To what end? Stop trying to turn a legitimate difference of opinion into some sort of battle between good and evil.
As far as the "worse offenders" go, the EPA doesn't exactly have jurisdiction over other countries, so it's a moot point. You're presenting an imaginary alternative -- that the EPA could somehow regulate greenhouse gases in China, India, etc. -- as some sort of evidence that this is only intended to bankrupt the EPA's revenue stream? Get a grip.
Wow, the crazy is strong with this one... You do realize that Bergen "found" bin Laden in *1997*, when the level of scrutiny on Osama was just a tad lower, right?
VZ and AT&T helped to invest in new phones by giving money to Apple and RIM in exchange for exclusive agreements.We're now in a market cycle where people want a good phone that can do everything since coverage is about the same everywhere.Sprint and T-Mobile are screwed because they cater to bottom feeders and now they're complaining. they want the new phones without paying to develop them.
Huh? Where is Sprint complaining? They still get exclusives, and the people complaining are consumer advocates and government anti-trust regulators.
Sprint's answer was to fund the Pre which is still in beta. no wonder no one was allowed to see it before launch.
Yes, and that's why Apple kept the iPhone a secret too, right? In the real world -- beyond your conspiracy theories -- consumers are getting screwed and complaining, and at least someone in government is listening. This has nothing to do with how well Sprint or T-Mobile is doing or who their customers are.
And there are only the tiniest of social programs that the Chinese government spends its money on and pretty much nothing on entitlements which make up 2/3 of the US's federal budget. There is no institutionalized 'somebody owes me' mentality keeping a large number of otherwise able bodied adults out of the workforce.
...and about 2/3 of those entitlements are going to retirees. Let's get those lazy old people off their asses!
"Does anyone else think that $50,000 is a hell of a lot of money to pay for a car?"
No, not really. Not for a cutting edge...early adopter technology no.
The question isn't "is it expensive compared to what you get?" The question is "is it expensive compared to what the average family could afford?" Of course you can abstractly say that an office chair that made you espresso and gave you handjobs would be worth $10000, but that doesn't make it affordable.
The US median annual household income is around the cost of a Model S. When someone says that it "costs too much," it's not about some retarded class warfare/rich-hating, it's because they have no reasonable way to afford owning one.
Slashdot Mirror
What an unfortunate company name... A "urthecast" sounds more like a documentary about the voyage of a tiny camera making its way to your bladder.
So Nissan just needs to come up with a new version of the Leaf that has the same battery capacity but sells for $10k and comes with a 12-year battery warranty? I can't wait!
The hardware may be getting out there for accepting payments, but as far as using your phone to pay, in the US the cell phone carriers are doing everything they can to screw things up for everyone. I bought a phone with NFC and foolishly assumed that I'd be able to use Google Wallet with it. I didn't realize that most of the major carriers (pretty much everyone but Sprint) are working on their own so-far stillborn alternative (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isis_%28mobile_payment_system%29), so they don't allow Google Wallet to function.
I never thought about the fact that Thinkpads don't scream "steal me!" until my ex-girlfriend's apartment was burglarized about 5 years ago. The idiot thief took a cheap, shiny looking Acer laptop and left behind two X-series Thinkpads that were sitting out in the open on a coffee table.
So the idea is that everyone will fly into the US and then take a boat or helicopter to the ship? You're still going to have to go through US customs when you enter the country and at least get at least a tourist visa for whatever amount of time you're on US soil, and then go through again to leave for the "love boat" to avoid having your visa expire. Of course that might not be such a hassle compared to getting a work visa, but it's not like you can just go straight to this place without dealing with customs.
If the information on a pre-RFID passport is sufficient for international travel -- which it presumably is, since I and millions of others still travel with them -- then an RFID-equipped passport with a non-functioning RFID chip that hasn't been otherwise defaced also has enough information. You could make the case that he should be prevented from traveling if it was obviously intentionally damaged, but it's certainly not lacking any necessary photographic or other identifying information if it's just the RFID chip that's damaged.
Our *current* rail system does suck, which is the entire point of building a new high-speed rail system. We like to talk about it because if it actually ever happens, it will be better than flying for a lot of domestic travel: more legroom, power outlets, not having to show up 2 hours before departure, the ability to use mobile data plans for the majority of the trip, etc.
This is pure speculation by his attorneys, and Slashdot should avoid using such needlessly inflammatory headlines.
It's pining for the fjords.
probably in the year
*ear
I'm pretty sure that falls into the "what I had for breakfast" category...
Are you some sort of bot that just randomly puts words together?
Will this prevent Adobe from installing their mongoloidish "Download Manager" Add-on that's set up to start every time you open a new window instead of just running when you start your browser?
You're not missing anything. If Slashdot is "news for nerds," Digg is "news for people who think they're nerds just because they know how to use the internet."
Come the fuck on. You cannot honestly believe that the US government, which depends on tax revenue from American businesses and their employees, would intentionally handicap said businesses? To what end? Stop trying to turn a legitimate difference of opinion into some sort of battle between good and evil.
As far as the "worse offenders" go, the EPA doesn't exactly have jurisdiction over other countries, so it's a moot point. You're presenting an imaginary alternative -- that the EPA could somehow regulate greenhouse gases in China, India, etc. -- as some sort of evidence that this is only intended to bankrupt the EPA's revenue stream? Get a grip.
Wow, the crazy is strong with this one... You do realize that Bergen "found" bin Laden in *1997*, when the level of scrutiny on Osama was just a tad lower, right?
I had my spleen removed 10 years ago, but I was just told to get yearly flu shots and to get a pneumonia shot every 5 years.
Huh? Where is Sprint complaining? They still get exclusives, and the people complaining are consumer advocates and government anti-trust regulators.
Yes, and that's why Apple kept the iPhone a secret too, right? In the real world -- beyond your conspiracy theories -- consumers are getting screwed and complaining, and at least someone in government is listening. This has nothing to do with how well Sprint or T-Mobile is doing or who their customers are.
...which is less than 1% of the CO2 that a 50MPG car produces while traveling down the highway.
You're right. If it wasn't for teacher's unions, Dan Quayle's stupidity would have remained a secret.
You, sir, are the very definition of the term "tool."
The question isn't "is it expensive compared to what you get?" The question is "is it expensive compared to what the average family could afford?" Of course you can abstractly say that an office chair that made you espresso and gave you handjobs would be worth $10000, but that doesn't make it affordable. The US median annual household income is around the cost of a Model S. When someone says that it "costs too much," it's not about some retarded class warfare/rich-hating, it's because they have no reasonable way to afford owning one.
Yeah, that's really not how it works...
You might want to get that checked out...