Slashdot Mirror


Hitachi Releases World's Most Energy-Efficient HDD

An anonymous reader writes "Today Hitachi released what they are calling the 'world's most energy efficient desktop hard drive' capable of reducing the active and idle power consumption by up to 40 percent over the previous generation." The drive will come in a range of flavors starting at 250GB and ranging to 500GB. Hitachi is promising these drives in high volume later this year.

23 of 118 comments (clear)

  1. Okay, Less Power by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Okay, less power. But what have you given up in the trade-off?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  2. your wallet by reaktor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You can bet these will be more pricey.

  3. okay. by ritalinvillain · · Score: 2, Funny

    but can they get rid of that horrible grinding noise?

    1. Re:okay. by trolltalk.com · · Score: 2, Funny

      > "but can they get rid of that horrible grinding noise?"

      ... its right after it stops making that grinding noise that it becomes super-energy-efficient!!! 0 watts!!!

  4. Three obvious things by ciroknight · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A) These drives were basically designed for datacenters, so you can look at paying out the teeth for them.
    B) Latency. Nowhere did they mention the "wake-up" time from the Low RPM mode, but you can guarantee it's horrendous. "Average Latency" as the specs say, only tell you what happened during test conditions, conditions very unlikely to put it into Low RPM mode.
    C) Density. Cutting edge drives are more dense.


    If I were Google, these might sound like attractive trade offs.

    --
    "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    1. Re:Three obvious things by More_Cowbell · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A) These drives were basically designed for datacenters, so you can look at paying out the teeth for them.
      Actually I doubt that. From TFA, they are 7200rpm SATA drives. In data centers this is really not what you will find.
      All servers in data centers are running 15000rpm these days. Mostly SCSI until recently, in my experience.
      --
      Experience teaches only the teachable. -AH
    2. Re:Three obvious things by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That doesn't really strike me as the first application of these drives. For something like a laptop, I could see it being very useful, where power usage is extremely important, and you don't mind waiting for the disk to spin up. In a datacentre, you most likely aren't going to be running the drive under conditions where it would have time to slow down, or you wouldn't be willing to make the sacrifice in speed that slowing down the drive would bring.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    3. Re:Three obvious things by graphicsguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If its being used in a data center, what is the likelyhood that it will be able to "low-idle" for any length of time?

      What percentage of Google's data do you think is actually being accessed at any given time? I'll bet most of the queries are for a small percentage of the data, plus most accesses are to the indexes and not to the actual data caches.

    4. Re:Three obvious things by Shadow-isoHunt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Perhaps in prebuilt systems and database servers, but it's more common than you'd think to just slap a bunch of SATA drivevs in raid 10 or raid 5 with a decent 3ware card managing the array. A decent sized(say, 300gb, because that's what's on newegg right now) 15k RPM SCSI drive from seagate will cost you $700. Why spend $1400 on 300gb of storage(you do need rendundancy if you need a 15k RPM drive), when you can spend the same money on a larger, faster array?

      --
      www.isoHunt.com
    5. Re:Three obvious things by monsted · · Score: 2, Informative

      SAS for the win.

      Now if only they'd all worked together and stuck with one serial standard instead of two very slightly different ones so we wouldn't have cheap SATA (that won't work with the good drives) and expensive SATA+SAS controllers...

      I want a couple of SAS (well, faster 10k) drives for my OS and SATA (well, slower, high capacity)drives for my bulk data, using one of the cheapish controllers...

      The whole distinction between SATA and SAS is silly anyway, since the interface makes little difference. We had the possibility of getting rid of that stupid "SCSI drives are better than IDE" notion once and for all, making way for interchangable drives of varying prices, qualities and speeds, all using the same interface, but someone blew it... again. SATA just shouldn't exist, really.

      Please, storage vendors, kill SATA. Quickly, before it's too late.

  5. This might be interesting for large arrays... by Gordo_1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    but for most desktops and servers, at 6-8 watts idle and 10-12 watts when actively seeking, HDD power consumption typically represents 5% or less of the overall power consumption of a modern system. Good PR for Hitachi though.

    1. Re:This might be interesting for large arrays... by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My laptop uses on 20 watts while operating, so cutting out 6 watts would be quite beneficial.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:This might be interesting for large arrays... by Skapare · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Portable drives powered via the USB connection can take more power than USB permits. Get the drive well under that level and you wan't need to use those double-USB cables.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  6. but will it run Linux? by frovingslosh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    OK, I've read the article, but he important question was not addresses: Will it run Linux, or XP for that matter, or does it get some of it's power savings by the same technique some new notebook drive do, embedded flash memory that is only supported in that awful Vista and not XP?

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:but will it run Linux? by pclminion · · Score: 2, Funny

      Will a hard drive run Linux... I quote Babbage: I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question.

    2. Re:but will it run Linux? by frovingslosh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe you are new here. The question is a classic one, and the meaning should be well understood by most readers. It is less clear but far more relevant to this group than the more wordy "but will Linux or XP be able to use this drive". And I explained the issue in the text body. Can you ever forgive me for the confusion that I have caused you?

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  7. That's nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    We have a closet full of hard drives, some of which have consumed zero Watts for about a decade.

    How's that for energy efficient?

  8. Silent by owlstead · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's not very noisy either, although it won't match silent 2,5 " drives by a long shot. So it's not that great for fan-less systems and all that.

    This range of drives:

    2.6/2.8 dB typical idle acoustics

    WD Scorpio (pretty silent 2,5 " HDD @ 5400 rpm):

    2.0 typical idle acoustics

  9. Re:Would it make a difference in desktop machines? by Quadraginta · · Score: 3, Informative

    I would have thought that PSUs draw a constant amount.

    Goodness, no. The current the power supply draws from the wall varies with the amount of power it's being asked to supply. You can easily verify this yourself by noticing how much hotter your laptop gets when you're making it do a lot of work. The heat it puts out is the final form of the energy the power supply draws from the wall (or the battery).

  10. WD's got one too. by eddy · · Score: 2, Informative

    WD's got one in their series named for german scheisse-pr0n: Caviar GP. 4W idle, capacities up to 1TB.

    --
    Belief is the currency of delusion.
  11. Re:Power consumption of a hard drive == ??? by soldack · · Score: 3, Informative

    My bet is that solid state drives do much better. Moving parts consume a lot of power.
    http://news.digitaltrends.com/news/story/12556/samsung_announces_64_gb_solid_state_drive
    "...consumes just half a Watt when operating (one tenth of a Watt when idle)"

    vs. from the article:

    "Through a 40-percent power reduction, Hitachi GST has delivered unmatched idle power utilization of 3.6 watts on the 250GB capacity model and 4.8 watts on models with capacities of 320GB or greater. Similarly, the P7K500 has reduced its active power requirements to 6.4 watts and 8.2 watts for its one- and two-disk models, respectively. By utilizing roughly half the 7 watts of idle power typically allocated for hard drives..."

    --
    -- soldack
  12. People don't even read the SUMMARIES any more ... by trolltalk.com · · Score: 3, Informative

    Lets go back to what I originally stated - that these drives are probably NOT for data centers.

    From the summary of TFA:

    > "Today Hitachi released what they are calling the 'world's most energy efficient desktop hard drive'

    These are probably NEVER going to go into data centers, at least not under any sort of warranty.

  13. High volume by amRadioHed · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hitachi is promising these drives in high volume later this year. Damn, I was hoping that the drives would be quieter too.
    --
    We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace