Slashdot Mirror


A Technology Report From A San Diego Fire Shelter

netbuzz writes "Retired journalist and mobility expert Jim Forbes is among the quarter-million San Diego-area residents driven out of their homes by the horrific wildfires. Forbes has taken the opportunity to 'fire blog' from his shelter and discuss via e-mail with Network World how his personal technology and the shelter's wireless networks are holding up under the strain. 'The shelter set up a dedicated computer room with an 802.11 a,b, and g network which worked like a charm. Lots of people brought notebooks when they left their home, so there was a whole lot of IM traffic in and out of the shelter. The local cell networks were subsumed by traffic early in the day so people were texting friends and loved ones a lot."

29 of 168 comments (clear)

  1. Fire Evacuees by jcicora · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well I say kudos to the people organizing the relief effort in San Diego. I think its great that they thought ahead to provide this kind of amenity to the people displaced by the ongoing disaster. This is the kind of project I would be glad to spend tax dollars on!

    1. Re:Fire Evacuees by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeap, you're just a giant asshole. Putting out every single wild fire isn't necessarily good policy, but neither is letting people's houses burn down.

      The firefighters know about fire management, and that in places like Yosemite the forest gets too thick when you try to put out fires too frequently. The Southern California fires are different though....they are largely grass fires, with grass that has dried out during the long summer. In addition the warm Santa Anna winds heat things up and push the fires along. So letting the fires burn one year will have little effect on the fires of the next year.

      We help those people out because we feel sorry for them. Basically, if you can look at someone's house that burned down, and expect them to just live in the street until they can find somewhere else to live, you have trouble empathizing with people and should get some help. Don't matter if it's their fault or not; I done enough stupid things in my life that I can forgive someone else for doing the same.

      --
      Qxe4
    2. Re:Fire Evacuees by maxume · · Score: 2

      I'm not particularly opposed to wifi. I just don't think it is 'important' in such a situation. That's also how I happen to read the very first post in this thread; I'm pretty sure the poster was being ironic, and they got cheerled right up to an insightful 5. That screamed for some poking with a stick.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:Fire Evacuees by CharlieG · · Score: 2, Interesting

      actually, it's more a side effect of the fact that the shelter operators need/want it to run the shelter! The has been a lot of work done on "how do we keep email up during disasters" - everything from broadband, to mesh networks, to satcoms, to sending email via ham radio (both on VHF packet networks and long distance HF links) - with the ham links, as soon as the traffic gets nto a radio outside the effected zone, the packets get routed onto the internet

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    4. Re:Fire Evacuees by Kelson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A better use of tax dollars(rather than making sure that shelters are nice(make the library a shelter and everybody's got a book, no need for wifi)) would be to buy up land where there is lots of grass that is prone to drying out and burning and preventing its development.

      Doesn't help, unless you create a wide, non-flammable buffer zone of some sort. Otherwise, you end up with the situation we have in Orange County, where some whackjob started a fire out in the undeveloped hills, which proceeded to burn through the dry grass and brush in public land, regional parks, a chunk of land owned by the Nature Conservancy, and more undeveloped land... right up to the edges of nearby cities. Driven by wind, it raced through 3 miles of undeveloped land in the first 20 minutes, and firefighters just barely managed to stop it before it jumped a major road into a residential area.

      The next morning, still driven by winds, it jumped right over a wide, multi-lane highway. Standard firebreaks aren't enough when you've got 70+ MPH winds that can send burning embers for several miles.

      So unless you want to buy up and then pave over a 3-mile wide buffer zone, it's not going to help as much as you seem to think.

    5. Re:Fire Evacuees by Xanius · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I guess you don't have any family in the San Diego area that you can't find or get in touch with then? Or ever had family in a natural disaster like this?

      I had family that we couldn't contact for over a week after Katrina hit, and I have grand parents that have been evacuated twice in SD and we don't know where they are. People being able to use a WiFi connection and get messages to worried family is one of the most important things in a situation like this.

    6. Re:Fire Evacuees by Kelson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So basically, you're saying that if there's any likelihood of a natural disaster at all, no one should live in the area?

      No one should live along the Gulf Coast, or the southern Atlantic seaboard, because they have hurricanes. Or California, because they have earthquakes. Especially not Southern California, because they have earthquakes and fires. Or the midwest, because they have blizzards. And tornadoes. And floods. Or Hawaii, because they have volcanoes. Pacific rim? Volcanoes and earthquakes. And tsunamis. South Asia? Floods.

      Once you eliminate all the regions prone to disasters, what's left?

  2. Now that's hard core by Critical+Facilities · · Score: 2, Funny

    As you might expect from a mobility expert, he's filling his shelter time "fire blogging." And he's also answered my e-mailed questions about how the people and technology are holding up in his shelter.
    The guy is literally running for his life to escape wildfires, yet has the brass balls to 'fire blog'. If that's not worthy of a nomination to Geek of the Year, I dunno what is.
    1. Re:Now that's hard core by evilviper · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The guy is literally running for his life to escape wildfires, yet has the brass balls to 'fire blog'. If that's not worthy of a nomination to Geek of the Year, I dunno what is.

      Bah! You clearly don't know California. Evacuating your home due to wild fires here is a lot like a road closure elsewhere... a minor annoyance you have to put up with for a few days, every couple years. Where your schools might close for "snow days", we have "fire days". Blogging about it is the most natural thing in the world... You have lots of time to kill.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    2. Re:Now that's hard core by evilviper · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In Jindabyne and Adaminaby they have fire days AND snow days

      That's true in much of California as well. Lots of mountain ranges. Right now, Arrowhead is burning. They get plenty of snow. Last year, maybe it was Big Bear (lots of snow). Maybe next year it'll be Silverwood. All three mountains, right next to each other, at the very North-end of the L.A. Basin.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  3. Re:Subsumed? by aicrules · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe the cell network got bought out and integrated into a larger one during the fire :)

  4. Priorities CA by MSTCrow5429 · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Honey, the house is on fire!" "Grab the laptop!" "What about the kids and the dog?" "Screw them, I need my WiFi fix!"

    --
    Slashdot: Playing Favorites Since 1997
  5. Isn't it great. by Xest · · Score: 3, Funny

    Isn't it great that technology like the internet has reached the point of acceptance that when peoples houses are burning down one of the main priorities is to ensure the shelter everyone has to hide in has wireless internet access and that people make sure they at least rescue their laptops and PDAs.

    I'm sure it wasn't much more than 5 years ago that people would look at you funny if you turned up in such a place and said "Right, where's the net access?".

    Oh how times change ;)

    1. Re:Isn't it great. by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It might look funny from an external point of view, but when you stack hundreds of people in shelters for days, morale soon becomes a concern as big as logistic. Giving them a way to get independant information and communicate with the rest of the world and their families is a cheap but effective way of reducing the stress of the refugees.

    2. Re:Isn't it great. by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Informative


      Well considering that many people now keep their photos, home movies, and finical records in digital form taking your notebook is a lot like taking the photo album. My wife keeps two portable hard drives with all that stuff on it just in case.
      Having the Internet in this case available is very useful. It allows you to contact your family and friends to let them know you are okay and to get news. During the Hurricanes the Hams where passing a lot of traffic just to let people know that there loved ones where okay.

      The big problem is still evacuation routing. When Frances was coming my wife and decided that we would bolt. It looked like a CAT 5 at the time and that is just too big to risk.. Some friends headed out hours before us but took the "freeway" I took an old back road. They went less than 100 miles in 16 hours. Many people where in danger of running out of fuel on the road. We had no problems and went twice as far in less time. The problem is everybody will try and jump on the freeways and over load them. If one gets cut then you are in real trouble.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    3. Re:Isn't it great. by jollyreaper · · Score: 2, Informative

      It might look funny from an external point of view, but when you stack hundreds of people in shelters for days, morale soon becomes a concern as big as logistic. Giving them a way to get independant information and communicate with the rest of the world and their families is a cheap but effective way of reducing the stress of the refugees. Communication is the best part. It's total chaos when you go through something like this. I went through the last three hurricanes that hit South Florida and I have to tell you, having a text-enabled cell phone was a great help. The cell towers are up and running before the landlines and text messages take up a lot less bandwidth than voice calls and your phone will keep trying to send until it gets a moment of access. In high volume cell situations, text always trumps voice.

      I would say that part of any modern evacuation plan would be establishing web-based email contacts for all your vital parties, then knowing that this is the best way to communicate. It might be a while before you have access to a computer but there you go, you can reach your people.

      Also, from a psychological point of view, it's just nice to know what's going on with your people. It was bad enough going throgh the storms but I would have really hated not having the TV and radio, not even knowing what's happening beyond my house. I couldn't imagine going through this kind of thing a hundred years ago, back when you didn't even know a damn storm was on the way until the wind started blowing.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  6. slightly offtopic by mapkinase · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  7. Wireless Skype Phone by Bryansix · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In the article he talks about his wireless Skype Phone. These things are really nice to have around. I have one at home since I don't get any cell reception there. I forsee that in 5 years all cell phones will just have this built in though.

    1. Re:Wireless Skype Phone by Bryansix · · Score: 3, Interesting

      T-Mobile already has plans to do it.

  8. Big One by Cally · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I've always been interested in the incipient Big One ever since the meme that it was due in 1976 and is now overdue went around. As the amount of critical infrastructure situated in and around SoCal has exploded along with the ubiquitous internet / cell connectivity, I can't help thinking that things are going to get pretty ugly when it comes, even if most of the actual buildings stand up and initial casualties are low, because of the density of comms and their upstream dependencies (power, transport links for service engineers, net ops and NOCs that maintain rather than going home to try digging out relatives, etc.

    A morbid line of thought, I know, but I do BCP / DR planning for my employer and we had a recent brush with an unplanned disaster (loss of a critical site for two weeks, due to the UK floods in July) which was a very... "interesting" experience. It was interesting how resilient we were despite having to wing it and improvise under tight time pressure; however, we were very very close to the point where it would all have fallen to bits. If a certain electricity substation flooded there'd be no power (== comms, food distribution,...) etc for the whole County. The CEP contingency plan for that is "evacuate Gloucestershire". The moral is, it's all good as long as you've got power, food & water, and your critical employees can and are able to work without putting themselves at risk.

    --
    "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
  9. Re:Running for his life? by reanjr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    how are the gas pumps doing through all this?
    The ones that are not in areas under fire are fine

    is there a gas shortage?
    doesn't appear to be one; could be because so few people are driving

    are they jacking up the prices on the highways?
    you mean just over the past couple of days? no, but they're chronically jacked up anyway

    is al gore going to relate this to global warming?
    it is likely

    is manbearpig responsible for it all?
    quite possibly

  10. Ham Radio ?? by Wapiti-eater · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm curious to read the after action reports - no more so than the folks living this nightmare. I'm curious to see how the local ham community participated in all this.

    Using texting for 'Health and Welfare' messaging via WiFi at a shelter is great and the shelter folks are to be applauded for making that work so well! Such communications has traditionally been - at least augmented - by the amateur radio community. Was there still need/a place for this? Where they reachable by those dozen or so people who don't have texting cell phones or WiFi clients? Did the hams setup the WiFi access, coordinate it or what did they do?

    Who knows - maybe now the SSB and CW enthusiasts will finally have to learn how to deal with TCP/IP, CAT5, WiFi and texting - in spite of the Jay Leno message race results.

    --
    Senior NCO in the fight against entropy. I've seen things, man. Things no one should have to see.....
  11. Please use Text Messages by DaveLatham · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I think one important thing that was hinted at by the summary, and mentioned more explicitly in the article is this:

    Is everything working as it should? Any glitches?

    ...The one message local media could have been better communicating is for evacuees to use cell phones only when they are necessary and then to try and limit the use to texting.

    If you're in an emergency area, please minimize your voice use, and try to use text messages instead as they are much more lightweight on the cell networks. And pass the message on to those around you.
  12. 300,000+ reverse 911 calls - plug for POTS by IvyKing · · Score: 3, Informative
    One of the great technology success stories of the ongoing fires is the number of people told to evacuate via reverse 911 calls. The bad news is that the calls only work for standard landline (and presumably cable_co phones where the number is tied to a specific address). In my case, I went to bed last night with a wired phone next to the bed - didn't want to depend on the power being on for the wireless phones.


    One sign of the success of the program is that only one fatality has been reported so far.


    Kudo's to 'Craig' for posting the information to Google Maps Sunday evening - that was the most informative source for info on the fire Sunday evening - pretty clear by 11PM that I wasn't going to work the next day (work was in a mandatory evac zone declared Monday morning).


    Some of the technology that hasn't worked has been the local '211' website (absolutely worthless) and the San Diego Union-Tribune website yesterday afternoon - they finally fixed that by dumping a lot of the flash and hosting the news updates on Blogspot. The local TV sites had too much flash to be useful.

  13. Lack of Fire Breaks by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The real issue here is environmentalists will not let them cut fire breaks.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire_break

    I understand them not wanting to cut it all down, but a few fire breaks in key spots
    would help them fight the fire, and would slow its spread as well.

    A few more water towers in the area on the tops of the hills would help them not
    have to truck in as much water, and or a list of all ppl with swimming pools in the area.

    The firebreaks do need to be fairly wide as the wind was a factor in these, as usual.

    Ex-MislTech

    --
    google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    1. Re:Lack of Fire Breaks by PhoenixOne · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ex-MislTech are you out here? Can you see the teams of environmentalists yelling at fire crews not to cut fire breaks? No? Fuck off.

      We have fire breaks, they're call freeways. They don't work. With 70+ MPH winds, you can't cut a break wide enough to stop these fires.

      Now, if you will excuse me, I have to cough up some black shit and then head back out to give blankets to people who just lost everything they own...

      --
      Spell cheek you've failed me four the last thyme!
  14. As a IT professional, I would like to remind you by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    to back up any unique data right now and prepare it for transport.

    That is all.
    Good luck.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  15. The winds out there turn "fire" into "blowtorch" by CFD339 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I am a firefighter, though not in that part of the country. I can tell you that in that kind of wind, stopping any fire in even a single home once the wind can get in (windows broken, etc.) is going to be extremely difficult.

    Embers larger than your hand can travel hundreds or even thousands of feet in that kind of wind and still be viable. These land on grasses and structures that have been dried over months then punished for days with these 90 degree, single digit humidity level winds. The winds are like a blow drier pointed at you face, on medium setting...for days.

    In the great Chicago fire, people fled across the river -- and embers were able to cross that space to ignite structures on the other side. Not just embers, either. The fires create their own weather, creating vortexes that look like tornados hundreds of feet high. Pretty scary stuff. You're not going to slow it down with a garden hose on your roof, and you're not going to put it out with a fire truck and a couple of hand lines.

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
  16. Re:Compare this to Katrina by tknd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A number of things make this event really different from the katrina event. I'd say, everything combined has made this disaster go that much smoother.

    People in San Diego have been very cooperative. The worst crime incident so far is a couple of teenagers "looting" for alcohol. Every report from Qualcomm stadium has been positive: donations of food and supplies were excessive that they have to tell people to stop donating. Plenty of shelters have been opened. Even pets are being spoiled rotten.

    Part of the reason may be that most people are fairly well off meaning middle to middle-upper class and the general feel of San Diegans is "chill". It matches the typical weather patterns where people start complaining when the temperature gets too cold for tshirts and shorts. Another major factor is that San Diego has already been through another major fire disaster in 2003 called the Cedar Fire. Because of that event, the county was much better prepared to deal with a major fire disaster. All agencies have been communicating incredibly well, even to the degree that military support and even Mexican support is now integrated into the effort. There was footage today of military aircraft outfitted with water buckets to do water drops. The fire chief went on local TV and announced that they are getting additional help from Mexican fire engines.

    Major changes to emergency procedures/technology such as reverse 911 has made communication with residents and coordination of evacuations much smoother. We received the reverse 911 call on our answering machine and the message clearly stated when the mandatory evacuation was in place and where residents should evacuate to. These calls are sent out well ahead and cover very large areas. If this happens in the future, I think most people will have well over an hour to pack their cars before they absolutely need to evacuate. Nursing homes and hospitals have also had plenty of time and cooperation with local officials to evacuate. The only people in immediate danger were those who refused to leave their homes until the very end. There have been a few cases of those, however, I think because those people actually wanted to stay, it kept many of the bad apples at home doing stupid things rather than causing problems in the shelters.

    Another thing to be aware of is the fires only affect one area at a time and it is easy to see if you're affected. That is unlike a hurricane where entire large cities are affected all at once. The worst that happen in San Diego is one community gets evacuated to an evacuation center, and the next day that evacuation center has to evacuate even further. The fires move slow enough that people have enough time to figure out where to go next. Many people simply went over to a friend in another part of the county or booked a hotel 20 to 30 minutes away.

    While there was plenty of time to evacuate, there is not plenty of time to move furniture or load your truck up with big objects. There is enough time to quickly prepare enough for a one week vacation, but you are still forced to look at all of your belongings and pick and choose between them. Some people had more time than others, but most people had enough time to think about getting the important papers, packing up some clothes, and picking a few important or favorite things. Many people also had enough time to move the cars out of garages and out to the street so they wouldn't burn if the house did.

    The worst part of the entire disaster is knowing whether or not your place burned down. Watching the local news is like an evil lottery. If you win that lottery, you'll have the comfort in knowing your place burned to the ground, however, if you don't see your place, you're still in the dark and playing an evil game. Either way, you don't want to play or win the game. There's plenty of footage where a street will show a perfectly untouched house, but the two houses on both sides of it are completely gone.