Slashdot Mirror


Samsung Unveils 64-Gbit Flash Memory Chip

Lucas123 writes "The chips can be combined to create a 128-GB flash storage device capable of holding up to 80 DVD movies or 32,000 MP3 music files. The chip was created using 30-nanometer processing technology that was developed with Samsung's self-aligned double patterning technology. Manufacturing will start in 2009; but the article quotes a Gartner analyst who reminds us, 'Samsung has had a difficult time adhering to its timelines for mass production due to the complexity of MLC architectures and ever shrinking process geometries.'"

14 of 150 comments (clear)

  1. 64Gb = 8GB = incremental improvement by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't know if I want storage that can't be addressed in 4 bytes.

  2. Combine by MyLongNickName · · Score: 4, Funny

    So you can combine 16 of these to get 128GB. Can you combine 32 to get 256GB? And what if you combine 128 of them for 1TB!? The possibilities are endless.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    1. Re:Combine by jimstapleton · · Score: 4, Funny

      no, no, it's not like that. Flash memory chips are like uranium/plutonium/etc - once a chunk reaches a certain mass (depending on purity), they have a habit of exploding.

      See, if you combine 16 of them, you'll probably just lose your computer, and be otherwise ok. However at 256, the room your computer is in will probably be a lost cause. At 128? Good by city.

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
  3. God bless the summaries... by doyoulikeworms · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...that provide storage sizes in units easy to relate with, namely pirated media.

  4. Oblig. Porn Comment by R2.0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    So if I can hold all my porn in one hand, and work the keyboard with the other...

    How's this supposed to work, again?

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  5. Say Goodbye to Microdrives by wolff000 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I never liked the micro drives for portable devices. I move around a lot and the micro drives tend to die on me. Where as the flash players I have had last well forever so far. The only one that died was one I dropped from 300 feet up while rock climbing.

    --
    WTF?
  6. Re:Storage size limit? by Drizzt+Do'Urden · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'd prefer 128 YodaBytes, and let the force hold my data!

  7. Bad math by damn_registrars · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Am I the only person tired of seeing storage listed in terms of "songs"? Come on,

    32,000 MP3 music files Really, that number doesn't mean squat. I have a friend who love punk music, where the songs are on average about 45 seconds long. I have another friend who listens to classical music, where many songs are 5 minutes or more. How could you possibly equate those two?

    Wouldn't it just make a lot more sense to say it could hold X hours of music, instead?
    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Bad math by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 4, Funny

      How much does that work out to in Libraries of Congress?

    2. Re:Bad math by raulzero · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, you're not the only one. I, for one, will not be buying a bag of these "chips" until they can hold data other than just music and video.

  8. Will they be arrested for conspiracy to commit... by Simonetta · · Score: 3, Funny

    Will they be arrested for conspiracy to commit piracy? Let's see 30,000 MP3 songs at $250,000 each time 1,000,000 chips. A lot of zeros means a lot of money! Everyone knows that if you sell a memory device that can hold 20000 MP3 songs that all but a handful will be 'pirated', that is to say copied without permission of their so-called owners. No one except loud-mouth fuckhead billionaire Steven Jobs is actually paying $30000 for 30,000 iTune songs. So if you make a device that facilitates file copying, aren't you guilty of conspiracy to commit intellectual property fraud?

        And don't tell me that there are alternative legal uses for hard drives and memory chips. After all, isn't the scope of the intellectual property crisis dire enough to overrule such petty and superficial uses of these devices? Isn't that what the entertainment industry is telling us? Aren't they the most important 'industry' in the USA and the world?

      In my town any teenager can have his life ruined by being arrested for having a little piece of blank paper in his pocket. The pigs (excuse me, I meant to say 'the Republicans') here call it 'conspiracy to possess marijuana paraphernalia', and it means just a cigarette rolling paper. And it's a serious crime with serious time.

      But every consumer electronics store in the city sells drives and media that are specifically used to commit so-called 'intellectual property theft'. Listening to music, having a little scrap of paper in your pocket, even suggesting that this is all nothing but corrupt,racist, selective law enforcement, it's enough to get you arrested and thrown into the vast American rape-torture gulag.

      But if the MPAA/RIAA is so smart and so bad, then why aren't they actually going up face-to-face, lawyer-to-lawyer against the manufacturers that make the hard drives and memory chips? Sure they'll go after single mothers making $8/hr and win $250,000 with their $300,000/yr lawyers and hand-written laws. But will they go after the Fry's, Walmarts, and BestBuys for selling the drives, PCs, and modems that make it possible for ordinary people to 'steal' their 'intellectual property'? Why not? They have the money, they have the lawyers, they have the testicles! So where's the beef?

      If they won't do this, then the entire music and entertainment global industry (it's what now, four giant companies?) should be taken over by the government as a RICO enterprise. We should make them do it. After all, it's us that are the most embarrassed by this corrupt extortion. Why aren't we doing anything about these assholes? Of course, they will self-destruct on their own, but they will do a lot of damage on the way down. We should put our collective heads together and deliver a coup-de-grace to these pathetic losers. Consider it a mercy killing. Which is legal here, but carrying a little piece of rice paper is not.

  9. Re:Storage size limit? by jollyreaper · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'd prefer 128 YodaBytes, and let the force hold my data! Yeah, but then Lucas will come along every few years and make changes to your data to bring it more in line with his original vision.
    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  10. Re:Storage size limit? by somersault · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Surely nobody needs that many porno movies one one drive?

    --
    which is totally what she said
  11. Don't ask "but how many writes before it fails?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Every single fucking time a flash memory article is posted some bunch of fucktards asks the same damn bunch of asshat questions or makes the same stupid "observation".

    The claim is that flash memory will somehow wear out too quickly to be useful; or "only lasts a few thousand writes" or some other stupid ass comment.

    Please please please - look up older articles and read the comments or just read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wear_levelling and shut up. Flash memory and its controllers have improved to the point where it's reasonable to expect an SSD to last longer than a typical PC or laptop's useful life.