Slashdot Mirror


UK Schools Warned Off Microsoft Deal

rs232 sends in a BBC piece on the UK computer agency Becta advising schools against signing up for a Microsoft educational license because of alleged anti-competitive practices. "The problem was that Microsoft required schools to have licenses for every PC in a school that might use its software, whether they were actually doing so or running something else." We have discussed Becta's role in British education here several times as they have acted as a watchdog warning of perceived Microsoft excesses.

63 of 337 comments (clear)

  1. Sighing up by Mikelikus · · Score: 4, Funny

    For a minute there, I thought they were making some sort of metaphorical statement.

    --
    -- Would it be acceptable to just put my name on my sig?
    1. Re:Sighing up by pete-classic · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think they are subtly stating that MS spell check damages students' ability to spell.

      -Peter

    2. Re:Sighing up by SnoopJeDi · · Score: 2, Funny

      Probably a reference to the collective sigh of all /. readers after simultaneously wondering if the editors are illiterate, or if they simply don't read what they post.

    3. Re:Sighing up by phillips321 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't often comment, the beers I've drank tonight give me the confidence to say FU Microsoft. I've always dreamt of the day that schools widely adopt *nix as the primary OS, I didn't think I would be fortunate to see it in my lifetime but the way MS is acting gives me more and more security that before the day i die i might actually see *nix as a standard in British schools, smile to all:)

    4. Re:Sighing up by Lunzo · · Score: 5, Funny

      I was going to moderate the parent, but there's no "-1 Drunk Ramblings" option...

    5. Re:Sighing up by value_added · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Probably a reference to the collective sigh of all /. readers after simultaneously wondering if the editors are illiterate, or if they simply don't read what they post.

      Few read the articles, many don't read even the summary (see the recent "Apple Makes $831 On Each AT&T iPhone"), few make use of the preview button, and our editors don't read the submissions. I wonder what it is any of us are doing here?

              Slashdot is the graffiti on technology's bathroom wall.

      Discuss.

  2. Educational License? by bazald · · Score: 5, Informative
    FTA:

    It reminds schools they are legally obliged to have licensed software, but suggests they use instead what is known as "perpetual licensing". Becta is just suggesting they continue to buy software rather than "moving to Microsoft's School Agreement subscription licensing model" even though it may be more expensive initially. This is because under the subscription licensing model, "Microsoft required schools to have licenses for every PC in a school that might use its software, whether they were actually doing so or running something else."
    --
    Insert self-referential sig here.
    1. Re:Educational License? by EvilGrin666 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I am a network manager in a UK school. So I do have a little knowledge on this subject. If anyone wishes to read up on exactly what a 'Schools Agreement' license entails they can do so here and/or here. If you want to get a feel for how much this scheme costs a school have a look at this thread or this one on EduGeek.

  3. Re:Linux by p0tat03 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sort of, kind of, not really? Schools are supposed to teach children skills that they can apply in the real world. One of these skills is keyboarding, and honestly, how many typing training packages have you seen on 'nix? Or even Mac?


    Kids' software needs are significantly different from that of adults, with the possible except of a good Office suite, which everybody needs. Where's the equivalent of your doodling software, trivia games, and all that stuff you would find in a primary school computer lab?


    While I agree MS's tactics here are pretty low, it doesn't immediately lead us to "switch to Linux", because honestly it's not a viable alternative.


    On the other hand, Apple has traditionally had the support of children's software publishers. Maybe they can leverage this situation to their advantage...

  4. Hmm... again, the article is.... slashdotish by El+Lobo · · Score: 5, Informative
    MS has 2 kind of educational licenses. In sweden they are called Select and campus. Select is the normal license: you install a MS product and you pay for it. Easy and every part is happy.

    THE OTHER ONE IS: You pay for all your machines OR users (you can choose the license type). Say , you have 30 users. You pay some ammount of money. Then you have the right to install every MS product for those users in every machine in the university/college/scool, etc AND at home as well. Of course, if you dont use MS at home you are still paying, but this is the agreement. And the prices are MUCH lower than on Select. But nobody is forcing you to agree with this license. Use the old goos Select (pay by installed produts) and thatä's all and well. Of course, this being slashdot, we need our daily article odf env^z^z^z... hate.

    --
    It's time to realise that Abble's products are the biggest abomination these days. Just say NO to the dumb iAbble way!!
  5. Why haven't schools switched to all Linux? by webmaster404 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why haven't schools switched to all Linux? Linux teaches students about computers Windows teaches students how to use Windows If someone learned UNIX 10 years ago, they could pick up a modern Linux distro and have little trouble with it, if you take someone who learned Windows 98 and put them on a Vista system, they would be confused and have no clue how to do the most basic things. Same thing with Office, if a UNIX student learned on vi, they could edit text files with ease on a Linux system, take someone who learned on Word 97 and put them on a Word 2007 machine and they would be confused. Not to mention practically anyone knows how to check e-mail, surf the web and get around an operating system, that doesn't get you ahead, now if someone knows PHP, Perl and Server Administration, they could be an entry-level sysadmin for a small company, while the other student would be more or less a data entry clerk, Windows leads to more dependence on MS products, Linux leads to more solutions and more opportunities.

    --
    There is no "disagree" moderation, and troll, flamebait and overrated are not valid substitutes
    1. Re:Why haven't schools switched to all Linux? by X0563511 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know, those are really good points that one usually doesn't see flying around here...

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    2. Re:Why haven't schools switched to all Linux? by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's not true at all. There are people (generally speaking) who learn by figuring things out for themselves, and there are people who learn by memorizing procedures. Those who figure things out for themselves will have no trouble going from Windows to any other OS, especially not another Windows OS. Those who memorize procedures will be just as confused going from Linux to anything else as they would be going from Windows to Linux. The weak link here is the people, it has nothing to do with the environment they use.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    3. Re:Why haven't schools switched to all Linux? by PhysicsPhil · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why haven't schools switched to all Linux? Linux teaches students about computers Windows teaches students how to use Windows If someone learned UNIX 10 years ago, they could pick up a modern Linux distro and have little trouble with it, if you take someone who learned Windows 98 and put them on a Vista system, they would be confused and have no clue how to do the most basic things. Same thing with Office, if a UNIX student learned on vi, they could edit text files with ease on a Linux system, take someone who learned on Word 97 and put them on a Word 2007 machine and they would be confused. Not to mention practically anyone knows how to check e-mail, surf the web and get around an operating system, that doesn't get you ahead, now if someone knows PHP, Perl and Server Administration, they could be an entry-level sysadmin for a small company, while the other student would be more or less a data entry clerk, Windows leads to more dependence on MS products, Linux leads to more solutions and more opportunities.

      I must take exception to this. Yes, if someone knows PHP, Perl and Server Administration they could be an entry level sysadmin. Or they could not know anything about them (well PHP and Server stuff) and become a physicist like me. This is a school setting we're talking about, and they have to train more than just computer users. Students shouldn't have to learn vi in order to type out a book report, nor should they need to know about server administration in order to use a web browser to research said report. The computer is a tool, something to make things easier, not an end unto itself. I think we forget that on Slashdot sometimes.

      Speaking from experience, a person who can use Word 97 will have little difficulty adapting to Word 2007, nor will they have much difficulty using OpenOffice for all of the basic stuff that 95% of us use it for. You are correct that Windows teaches someone how to use Windows, much as *nix teaches someone how to use another *nix flavour. The person who picked up Windows 95 is not going to have trouble with WinXP, and the person who learned Unix ten years ago will pick up Ubuntu just fine today.

      Much like we don't need to understand how a car works to use it, we can be perfectly productive computer users without knowing about the nitty gritty details. Would it help? Sure, sometimes, but we have to weigh the time spent learning those details against the time that could be spent learning other useful things (physics, perhaps?). Switching to *nix just to expose people to the internals of a computer OS isn't necessarily doing them any favours.

    4. Re:Why haven't schools switched to all Linux? by Bazman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Because the idiots are winning, to quote Dan Ashcroft. We geeks may have spent the last 15 years telling people how Windows and proprietary software sucks so badly, yet still they buy it.

      This week someone in my department had a problem reading and editing equations in a Word DOC file in OpenOffice. And then he tried genuine Microsoft Word and still had problems. Turned out the equations were done using 'Mathtype', some extra add-on for Word. "Doing it wrong!", I cried, "why is anyone writing papers chock-full of equations in Word anyway? Use LaTeX like everyone else in the department. It's free, it produces nicer papers, it is just beautiful."

      So they asked for my advice, and it was 'use LaTeX'. What they did: buy more MathType licenses.

      I'm thinking of starting a policy of not helping anyone who asks for tech support in our department and then does something else. I'm speccing up two labs with about 50 seats this week. I'm recommending 50 thin clients and 5 fat servers just to make it manageable. If the suit overrules this and says 'no, no, no, just put 50 desktop boxes in' then I'm not supporting it - to the extent of quitting the project. The idiots are not winning this one (although the servers will of course be running Win TS 2003 as well as Linux).

      I'm not sure how we can stop the idiots from winning - MS will up their muscle in the fight, since they fatten up the idiots in order to feed off them. Or is it more like giving them free heroin and getting them hooked and then charging for the next fix. It's idiocy whatever way you cut it.

      End of Sunday night before Monday Work Rant.

      [Dan Ashcroft was a character in Nathan Barley...]

    5. Re:Why haven't schools switched to all Linux? by vic-traill · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why haven't schools switched to all Linux? Linux teaches students about computers Windows teaches students how to use Windows.

      I tried to deconstruct this sentence, and can't really get anywhere with it.

      Operating systems are just that; systems software that facilitates the use and configuration of the hardware it is running on. I don't think that there is an inherent element within any OS which 'teaches' anything.

      Obviously individuals develop preferences, and one's experience may even lead to a greater understanding of systems' architecture (or similar) using a particular OS. Certainly my experience was that using *nix of various flavours encouraged me to dig into elements of hardware and design more than using classic Mac OS did at the time. I don't think I would have ever started trying to write device drivers for NICs, or SLP drivers, if I had only been using a MAC (pre-OS X).

      Before I get hammered by the Mac crowd for this comment, let me say that I don't think this was as a result of any shortcoming; rather, I believe that by *intention* using a Macintosh focused me as a user on the functional outcome I was trying to achieve, isolating me *by intention* from the internals below. That's fine - it's just one approach to structuring the user experience.

      By contrast, the experience of obtaining and installing Slackware at the time made me very aware of the underlying system elements for interfacing with and using the hardware, and I suppose this is what the original poster may have been driving (sorry!) at - that using Linux leads to one being more informed about the systems architecture and interaction.

      There's nothing sacred about this though - some people will argue that the point of using computers is to focus on the functional outcome desired, not learn how the underlying system is structured or works. I suspect that most folks on /. are interested in all these elements, but we're not typical users.

      As for the ease of transition for Win98-->Vista vs. say SysV-->Ubuntu w/ gnome, I dunno if I buy this. Hell, trying to move people between kde and gnome has been known to start a war.

      As for what all this has do do with why schools don't all use OSS, I'd say 'not much'. In the institution I work at, the main factors keeping OSS installation 'pocketed' rather than ubiquitous are custom software required to support faculty's curriculum on the academic side, and resistance to anything that doesn't say MS Office on the admin side.

      I suspect that almost all software baked into curriculum (at least at the undergraduate level) has a reasonable OSS equivalent, but some (enough) faculty are strident in their resistant to change, and there is zero that the IT function can do about it.

      Ironically, file portability/sharability led to the standardisation on MS Office in this institution; a potpourri of word processors but primarily WP were previously in use, but as MS marketing succeeded in selling Office, the critical mass of Word documents flowing in and out of the place ended up in a decree of Word only. Now the suggestion of using anything else leads to howls of outrage, and naturally MS continues to work to maintain complications of selling a switch via the Office Open XML specification.

      It's not a money issue - the MS Campus agreement in use here keeps the annual cost of license upgrades for OS and Office plus other misc apps low enough that there isn't a big enough dollar saving available to make a compelling business case for the switch, particularly in light of the knee-jerk opposition to any such change.

      All that being said, OSS gets big time play in the institution's back-end services, and there are pockets of energized evangelists. The biggest push on the desktop I see within the institution is not related to OSS, but rather to OS X. Fifty percent of student notebooks coming through the door are running OS X, and there is a growing faculty contingent running OS X as well.

      I think the change is more likely to be from Windows to OS X, if anything. Small mercies, I suppose - at least it is Unix. But the licensing is just a switch from one big corp to another.

      --
      [17] Leary, T., White, C., Wood, P. R., Bhabha, W. D., and Wirth, N. Lambda calculus considered harmful. In Proceedings
    6. Re:Why haven't schools switched to all Linux? by JFitzsimmons · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because MathType lets you just click some buttons and insert mathematical equations into Word. If you already have Word and mathematical experience, your downtime is approximately 30 seconds. To deploy LaTeX however, you have to learn an entire typesetting language, from scratch, with a significantly poorer interface (text file). And then you have to 'compile' your file into something before you can observe the results. No wonder they spent the couple hundred mathtype licences; how many man hours would be lost training everyone to use LaTeX?

      --
      Beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master. -Anonymous
    7. Re:Why haven't schools switched to all Linux? by Lesrahpem · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We're reaching a point where cross-platform applications are becoming much more common than they were 10 years ago. In many cases popular software has versions for Windows, Mac, and Linux, all of which generally work the same way and have the same features on each respective OS.

      I think schools should take advantage of this and focus on using cross-platform software in the classroom whenever possible. Doing so almost guarantees that students will be able to use the same software at home that they use at school (no matter what OS they use at home). It also means that students who need to use a computer with an unfamiliar OS will still be able to get work done since the program(s) they are used to using will likely be available for that OS.

      I worked as an instructor in the computer lab of a Boys and Girls Club for a few years, and this is about what I did. Ten computers in the lab had Windows 2k Professional on them, and a wide range of lower ends computers had Linux on them. I made sure all of the computers, regardless of OS, had Open Office, Firefox, Gaim (now pidgin), Thunderbird, Abiword, Gimp, and VideoLAN on them. I taught the children (ages ranging from 6 to 18) how to use the programs and the differing operating systems were never really a problem. Since all of the software was open source I was also able to give them all CD's which they could use to install the software at home or wherever else. In doing so, I made sure that our choice of operating systems did not negatively impact their education. I think schools need to do the same.

    8. Re:Why haven't schools switched to all Linux? by value_added · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You are correct that Windows teaches someone how to use Windows, much as *nix teaches someone how to use another *nix flavour. The person who picked up Windows 95 is not going to have trouble with WinXP, and the person who learned Unix ten years ago will pick up Ubuntu just fine today.

      I think this is true only for very small values of true. Yes, Windows teaches someone how to use Windows, but chances are high that years later they will, if bright and attentive, accumulated a collection of Windows-specific trivia (mostly interface-specific) and nothing more.

      By contrast, someone "who learned Unix ten years ago", or even last year, is unlikely within their first few months of learning not to have, at the very least, a familiarity with the fundamentals of what a computer is and how it works. That's knowledge that extends past a single operating system and relevant outside of the fool's notion of a computer as "a tool". In fact, I'd bet that most point-and-click novice Ubuntu users, for example, have a basic understanding of what a kernel is, what code is, how memory is used, file systems, rights and permissions, basic IO, networking, etc., etc. From there, their learning is limited only by their motivation and imagination. I'd even go so far as to say that it would take a undue effort to avoid learning when everything is documented, logical, transparent, historically consistent, and unambiguously presented to the user at every turn.

      Seems to me that dismissing any of this as unimportant or characterising it as a bunch of "nitty gritty details" is tantamount to saying learning to use a technology that's become (and will continue to be) a major part of everyone's lives, and is used (and will be continue to be used) daily at work and at home by just about everyone in the industrialised world, is of negligible value. It also suggests that such issues as a skilled and employed work force, patents, copyrights, and the destructive effects of monopoly power aren't real social or political concerns, but mere annoyances.

      What is it, I wonder, that we should be teaching our kids? Show them how to press the image of a button, because someone else worked out the button part? If that's the case, then I say we should skip Physics as well. Why invest the time and effort to learn Physics, when it's more efficient if not easier to wait for someone to put the principles, knowledge and study into practical use? We can then just buy the product on the shelf when it's available for sale.

      Like software from Microsoft.

  6. Re:I wonder what software they use? by NoodleSlayer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And if you had simply RTF Summary, not even RTFA, you would have noted that the issue is not whether or not to use Windows, but the draconian, monopolistic terms that Microsoft tries to force on schools with their educational subscription licensing models. The idea that they force schools to buy licenses for every single machine regardless of whether or not it is running Microsoft software is just this side of extortion, and BECTA was simply pointing out that it is not in a school's best interest to sign such terms, and should opt instead for the normal perpetual license that people purchase. Not over whether or not to use Windows (and Office in this case too), at least not in the short term.

  7. Re:Linux by Aladrin · · Score: 2, Informative

    How many are you supposed to need?

    I know you were trolling, but I have to thank you anyhow. I hadn't thought to look for a touch typing tutor on Linux, but now I have and KTouch looks like it's pretty decent.

    --
    "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
  8. Since when is Microsoft the law? by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    > "The problem was that Microsoft required schools to have licenses for every PC in a school that might use its software, whether they were actually doing so or running something else."

    Microsoft can't "require" this. Same as the BSA or CAAST can't just show up at your doorstep and "require" anything. Not even a "license audit."

    Good for Becta.

    1. Re:Since when is Microsoft the law? by Richard+W.M.+Jones · · Score: 2, Informative

      They can and do if you license the software. Read your license. You gave permission. In attempting to revoke the license, I am dropping the software licenses which grant permission.

      That may or may not be true for schools. It's certainly not true for consumers, since consumer rights laws in Europe are much stronger than in the US. Unfair clauses and ones that you didn't have the chance to negotiate are automatically discarded. See for example: http://www.consumerdirect.gov.uk/before_you_buy/think_of/unfair-contracts

      Rich.

  9. Re:Linux by vux984 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Kids' software needs are significantly different from that of adults, with the possible except of a good Office suite, which everybody needs. Where's the equivalent of your doodling software, trivia games, and all that stuff you would find in a primary school computer lab?

    Actually the vast majority of that type of software runs pretty flawlessly under wine.
    Its not generally complex software. I'm sure you could find exceptions, but for every exception that didn't work, you could probably easily find software that did. Its not like there are a shortage of 'doodling' and 'trivia' games to try.

    That said, my daughter's kindergarten class has a classic iMac with OS9 on it. And I have no issues with that. Its a suitable machine for what they are doing with it.

    It would be absurd for them to have to license XP Professional for it, even if it is a discounted copy.

  10. Re:Linux by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hadn't thought to look for a touch typing tutor on Linux, but now I have and KTouch looks like it's pretty decent.

    What? The regular 'touch' command isn't good enough for you?

    --
    This guy's the limit!
  11. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Most schools I work depend mostly on crap from RM, and if lucky the admin can buy some shit like Dell. E-learning credits to blame...

    The machines bought have always had older hardware for their time, and are a nightmare to administer. Made even worse that as ad admin there is no decent install cds - all restore discs. great.

    Many of these places I`m probably the only person that is aware of licensing and paying for each install etc... but unless it's some shit sent in by one of the many education software companies to review it's near on impossible to get permission to get money released. Had to laugh when we needed a server license for a network file share (cos xp max 10 limit) when all the old 95/98 did it anyway.

    rant rant rant too jaded but it's all bollocks in education over here. I just can`t imagine a situation where IT would install an OS wide spread without a hardware change. Education was better off with old computers before all this funding started getting mis spent. Spending most of my times filling holes and fixing stupid crap rather than developing.

    yadda yadda yadda

  12. Intel Macs by bazald · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I already replied above, but on an unrelated note, it just occurred to me that this license would brilliantly require schools to pay Microsoft subscription fees for all their macs with Intel CPUs. As education is one area where Macs are close to dominant, this is a brilliant move. Kudos.

    --
    Insert self-referential sig here.
  13. A UK School Sys Admin's Response... by nbannerman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well I'm a Sys Admin / Network Manager in a school in the UK.

    Truth of the matter is I have approximately 2% of the school budget made available to me; this equates to about £150,000. Using that money, I run a 2000+ user network, with nearly 750 attached devices (thin clients, fat clients, printers, etc).

    I run an almost entirely Microsoft shop - 2000/2003/Exchange/XP/XPe, with Office 2003 / Encarta / Project as well. In terms of non-MS OS, take your pic from Debian, Thinstation and a host of Linux-based thin client devices (Neoware, Wyse, etc).

    My Microsoft licensing costs come in at around £12,000 per year, this also includes my terminal service licensing. Is that a lot? Not really - the buy price for 650+ copies of XP, Office, plus CALs for Exchange, 2003 and Terminal Services is prohibatively high imho.

    BECTA can complain about the terms of the agreement, and suggest we spend our money 'up front', but unless they are going to provide funding, I'm afraid to say I'll stick with the Schools Agreement for now.

    I'd love to have the money to buy outright, don't get me wrong. But for a school with a relatively low income (ie our students come from a high socio-economic area) I simply can't afford to do it - £12,000 a year is however a manageable cost.

    1. Re:A UK School Sys Admin's Response... by nbannerman · · Score: 4, Informative

      It would cost nothing in terms of hardware and software.

      What would it cost to migrate, in terms of staff / student training? What would it cost to get my two technicians up to spend on OSS? What would it cost to migrate?

      The truth of the matter is there are three ICT staff at the college - myself and two technicians. Running a 2000+ user network is one thing; running that network and migrating to a completely new way of doing things is something you don't undertake lightly.

      I'm getting there - slowly. I'm pushing for thin clients to start with - reducing our dependancy on 'the latest and greatest' hardware. The next thing will be to replace the 2003 Terminal Services with linux-based ones. One step at a time - thats the plan.

  14. Re:Linux by EvilGrin666 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Actually the vast majority of that type of software runs pretty flawlessly under wine. Ironically, a lot of the software actually runs better under wine than under XP/Vista because it's ancient and crusty 16bit stuff.
  15. Re:Hmm... again, the article is.... slashdotish by Foofoobar · · Score: 2, Funny

    MS has 2 kind of educational licenses...
    Yes, the 'give us your first born' and 'fork over your mortal soul' licenses
    --
    This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
  16. Re:Linux by langelgjm · · Score: 2, Informative

    Typing training packages? When we were taught to type, we had these things called "books," that we put next to the computer. In fact, I'm pretty sure the book we used was published when the Selectric was new.

    --
    "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
  17. Re:Linux by hedwards · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sort of, kind of, not really? Schools are supposed to teach children skills that they can apply in the real world. One of these skills is keyboarding, and honestly, how many typing training packages have you seen on 'nix? Or even Mac?


    Kids' software needs are significantly different from that of adults, with the possible except of a good Office suite, which everybody needs. Where's the equivalent of your doodling software, trivia games, and all that stuff you would find in a primary school computer lab?


    While I agree MS's tactics here are pretty low, it doesn't immediately lead us to "switch to Linux", because honestly it's not a viable alternative.


    On the other hand, Apple has traditionally had the support of children's software publishers. Maybe they can leverage this situation to their advantage...

    When I was in school, the only difference between the computers we used and the ones that adults used was that kids were at the keyboards and the particular programs we wanted to use. The typing programs were on computers that were probably 13 or 14 years old, and all of them were still monochrome. Most of them were mid 80s era ibms.

    As for typing, there is always http://tuxtype.sourceforge.net/ I haven't used it, but it looks like it is in a similar vein to the typing program I used at home.

    Typing programs are really not that hard to design, especially if they are like the ones that were used in my typing class. Basically we would copy on the line below what was printed on screen, and the teacher would yell if we were looking down. The computer would then compare the lines, calculate the time and give a score. Not really that hard to do.

    The big issue is that if a student can't afford to purchase Office 2007 on top of the price of a computer, why should they be unable to bring files over to the school computers? The site licensing isn't inherently wrong, it really depends upon how much is being charged, if the price for the total computers is below what the price for just the ones in use, that isn't such a bad thing. The school my mother works for has a site license for a number of programs and they can install that on a huge number of computers without having to account for where each copy is.
  18. Linux does not teach students about computers ... by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why haven't schools switched to all Linux? Linux teaches students about computers Windows teaches students how to use Windows

    No. Linux and Windows are equivalent in the sense that neither teaches students about computers, they both teach students about an operating system.

    if a UNIX student learned on vi, they could edit text files with ease on a Linux system

    Again, Linux and Windows are far more alike than you claim. The student who learned DOS EDIT can open a console and run EDIT under Windows.

    More importantly, much open source software (OpenOffice, GIMP, Apache, MySQL, ...) is also available for Windows.

    Schools should not be teaching Windows or Linux. Neither is appropriate. Common business and productivity tools are appropriate, but only to the degree that a student could write and print an essay, solve some math problems with a spreadsheet, etc. Expertise in such tools should be reserved for some sort of business class. Teaching kids to be admins is *not* something K-12 education should be doing. We have already stolen too much time from basic reading, writing, arithmetic, and science.

  19. Re:I wonder what software they use? by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'll play devil's advocate here.

    If you buy licenses per-computer where needed, then the school has troubles figuring out what licenses it owns and where they are being used.

    If (say) 90% of a school's computers are going to run the MS software, and MS is offering a 20% discount for site licensing, the school wins both in money and in admin hassle by taking the site license, even though some of the computers won't use the paid-for software.

    (In this particular case, there is an additional complication that the site licensing is per-year, whereas perpetual licensing is one-time up-front.)

    --
    Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
  20. Re:Linux by mackyrae · · Score: 2, Informative

    TuxTyping has a rather limited wordlist...at least on the "long word" setting (I haven't tried any of the easy settings). A friend of mine is a high school teacher, though, and he teaches computer science. The "advanced topics" class, where students who've taken a year of programming classes are given the chance to write whatever software they want (basically), has a student who is writing a typing tutor program that is in a game format similar to one the teacher said he remembers. It sounds like it acts like TuxTyping with the falling letters, but you have to type the full word and it won't let you switch until either you get the word wrong or you finish it. TuxTyping, unfortunately, lets you type the letters out of order. Of course, as with all software written in that teacher's classroom, it will be open source for Linux (they use Edubuntu in their school computer lab, so Linux is their natural target OS).

    --
    look! it's a bird, it's a plane, it's....a girl? yes, a girl browsing Slashdot on Linux
  21. Re:WTF?? by Daimanta · · Score: 2, Informative

    I love the fact that the word wankers can result in a +1 Informative.

    Idiots.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
  22. Re:Linux by freedomlinux · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hey! I practiced my typing with 'touch' and it put tons of empty files all over my /home! grr... buggy software
    On a more serious note, KTouch is a useful program, and you will likely find an open-source program equivalent to pretty much everything.

  23. Re:Linux by niiler · · Score: 5, Informative
    You've got to be kidding me. In addition to the touch typing options mentioned above, there are:

    For languages:

    For Physics:

    For Math:

    For geography:

    For music:

    For Mind-Mapping:

    Anyhow, you get the gist. As someone who has taught in both High School and College and whose wife tutors middle schoolers, I can't say that I've seen anything they are running that can't be replaced by linux based code (or in rare cases, by Windows code running on Wine).
  24. Re:Linux by leenks · · Score: 3, Informative

    That's a poor argument. As much as I dislike Windows, it is possible to lock it down so it is barely customisable / tweakable / usable too.

  25. Re:This is unbelievable by petermgreen · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Afaict the situation goes something like.

    An educational establishment has lots of PCs running various versions windows and various versions of various software some MS, some none MS, some legit, some pirate. This is a management nightmare but paying regular prices to upgrade everything would be cost prohibitive. MS comes along and offers windows and office at a very steep discount and with the right to use any version you want (the windows OS part is upgrade/downgrade only but since virtually all machines come with an OEM windows license that is not really a major issue).

    However to get the products at this discount they have to sign up to terms that are not very nice. The license cost is based on some factor other than the number of machines running windows (for schools I belive it is total number of PCs, for universities I think it is total students or something like that). So there is no financial incentive to move individual machines to free software. Further the deals are often subscription based so the institution has to keep paying even if they have no desire to upgrade.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  26. Re:Linux by rtb61 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I believe you missed the real issue of licence that M$ was trying to foist on schools. It was attempting to make M$ licence compulsory for all students regardless of what computers they were using. Say for example schools decided to use the OLPC computer as it fulfils all the necessary requirements for schools, a low cost durable computer with all the required free software needed and specifically targeted at student education.

    So while lazy, cheap teachers get the free windows and M$ office at home they are making everybody else pay for all the student licences even when the student's computers aren't and likely wont be using any M$ software. So it is a straight up lie and to be honest your lie is just that as well. The truth is M$ is not a viable option for school use, where you would have to be paying a licence fee for each and every student for the 12 years that are at school amounting to thousands of dollars added to the cost of public schooling, M$ exploiting children yet again.

    As for keyboarding, I used a computer everyday at work no touch typing, basically because I had to shift the keyboard around my work, no set location, no touch typing. So you see everybody on the planet employed as secretaries, computer coders and data input operators. Silly me and I though the OLPC XO laptop was already being used with Linux to effectively teach children in schools and that was the real reason behind the new M$=B$ licensing scheme.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  27. Happened in NZ with MS Office on Macs... by zurtle · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Slashdot covered a very similar predicament a while ago:
    Clicketh

    Given the timestampdiff between the two it looks like it is taking people a while to wake up to the reality of Microsoft licencing.

    --
    Couldn't stand the weather
  28. Re:Linux by chromatic · · Score: 2, Funny

    You have to lock Windows down to make it barely usable now?

  29. Re:Linux by T-Bone_142 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The best way to teach a kid to type is a IM Client. Seriously, i have seen it work for a lot of kids and some of these kids have learning disabilities (like ADD).

    --
    "In Soviet America, Passport Stamps You!"
  30. Bad idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Y hello thar, R U gonna cum over tonite?"

    Won't anybody PLEASE think of the children???

  31. Re:One of those tricks by Blkdeath · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I remember in High School they disabled access to C: via My Computer. Well you could open the properties of any shortcut and click Find Target and you're in. Or getting into Control Panel via Windows Help's "Show Me" feature.

    One student at the high school I was administering discovered that even with our more prohibitive settings (many/most of those alternatives were disabled) he could simply create a shortcut to C: on a floppy disk and he was home free.

    Sure, I was pissed at him, but at the same time I was impressed with the elegant simplicity of it all.

    --
    BD Phone Home!

    Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

  32. Can't...help...myself! Arrghh! by rts008 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Slashdot is the graffiti on technology's bathroom wall."

    'Though They paint these walls to stop my pen, the Shithouse Poet has struck again!'

    I cannot properly attribute this, but I did see it in my high school restroom in 1974.

    BTW, that line of yours would make a great /. sig, IMHO!

    "I wonder what it is any of us are doing here?"

    Yeah, it can seem like that quite often, but for me...
    I have learned some neat stuff here, some not so neat stuff(goatse I'm looking at you-aghhh!), and have heard a lot of useless stuff.
    It seems to find equilibrium at slightly positive for me.

    Sometimes it's something funny that makes my day brighter. Sometimes it opens whole new mental doors for me. Sometimes I find out how far I am either ahead or behind the curve on a subject. Sometimes it's just silly and a waste of time.
    But it is always Slashdot....kind of like online Russian Roulette, but my survivors don't have to clean up the mess off the walls and floors when it goes bang!

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  33. Re:Linux by Blkdeath · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Its also harder for teachers to administrate.

    Take it from me; teachers don't administrate, and when they do all they do is mess things up. Usually pretty horribly at that. Teachers in public (elementary, secondary) schools tend towards the computer illiterate side of the fence. Some to the degree of simple uncertainty, some to the degree where they'll order a student suspended because they changed their desktop background - that's the outright fear category right there.

    We've had teachers inform us, the lowly know-nothing network administrators (see, we weren't University Edumucated so what could we really know anyways?) that their lab was working PERFECTLY the day before, that NOTHING had changed, except somehow the computers wouldn't turn on anymore. Yes, of course they're plugged in! I checked it personally!

    Yes, the power bars were unplugged from the wall outlets. He was correct though; the computers were in fact plugged into the power bars.

    As for software administration, hoo-boy, you don't even want to go near that one.

    Security? What of the teacher who used to perpetually walk from his math class to the computer lab across the hall and leave his online bank and investment site LOGGED IN all through 2nd period?

    Or even common sense. Like why I, a male network administrator, would want access to the girl's phys-ed office (not the change room, the office, where the computer connected to the dead printer was).

    --
    BD Phone Home!

    Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

  34. Will Linux replace Windows? by LingNoi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder if Ubuntu will replace Microsoft on school computers.

    I just saw that Tesco UK is selling Ubuntu PCs as well! This is a first in England.

    For those that don't live here Microsoft is the computer. For about 10 years I have never heard of anyone else using Linux in the UK (I mean walking around or in real life. Not over the internet), then this year suddenly walking around the university everyone's laptops have Ubuntu or Fedora or SUSE. Even my university has SUSE in one of their labs. Now that is a first!

    There was a piece from 2005 in which it talks about the government seriously thinking of switching all its software to open source.

  35. Re:Linux by Blkdeath · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What would motivate such a person to make the post at all?

    Haven't you ever known somebody who speaks mostly because they like the sound of their own voice? Same principle applies to the text from their fingers.

    --
    BD Phone Home!

    Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

  36. Re:Linux by ozmanjusri · · Score: 2, Funny
    Haven't you ever known somebody who speaks mostly because they like the sound of their own voice?

    Haven't you ever heard of employees who denigrate a competitor's products?

    I doubt we'll agree on this, so let's be fair and split the difference. 50% astroturfer and 50% psycho?.

    --
    "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  37. Re:Linux by Blkdeath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The worst way to teach a kid to type is a IM Client. Seriously, i have seen it work for a lot of kids and some of these kids have learning disabilities (like ADD).

    There, fixed that for you.

    Kids who use IM clients, text messaging on cell phones, etc. develop a very early crutch on short forms, symbols, letters in place of words, acronyms for anything common, a complete lack of syntax and a dozen other nightmares preventing the proper development of language skills. The younger they're exposed to this the worse off they are.

    My younger brother is guilty of all of the above and I insist that when he talks to me via IM he use proper sentence structure or I'll ignore him. I don't want to hear about "2day wen i went 2 da part wit ma bffls ... " and it serves no educational purpose to him or his friends to continue in that fashion.

    --
    BD Phone Home!

    Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

  38. Re:One of those tricks by Kalriath · · Score: 4, Interesting

    At work I totally blew up the security one of our tech guys work, using Internet Explorer's Help Menu. Click Help > About > System Info > Open > Right Click > Explore. If that's disabled, then it's off to View > Privacy Policy > Tell me about cookies > Tools > Internet Options > (Temporary Internet Files) Settings > View Files. Even if all the icons are gone, get Task Manager open, click Help > About > End User License Agreement (would you believe it opens NOTEPAD?!?) And to top it all off, MS Word is officially the biggest vulnerability in that type of security (can you get to the VB Editor in that? "Shell cmd.exe" is the one line that demolishes all security).

    --
    For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  39. Re:Linux by cheater512 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Its also trivially easy to bypass such server side login scripts.
    Pulling out the network cable about 5 seconds after logging in usually does the trick. :)
    Windows then defaults to a 'allow all' state.

    Yes Windows is fully scriptable but it will only allow you to lock down the really obvious things.
    They are extremely simple to work around if your determined enough.
    Hint: At a school, there will be plenty of bored kids who are determined.

  40. Re:Linux by dotancohen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    At my university their are XP machines locked down so that one cannot even open the file manager, they are web-browser only (supposedly). To access my disk on key, I found that I can simply browse the filesystem in IE's File -> Open dialog.

    When I decided that I'm sick of that setup, I tried to boot Slax but discovered that the BIOS is set to boot from the harddisk first, and is password protected. So I unplugged the machine, and using a broken mechanical pencil managed to pop to battery off the motherboard through air vents in the locked case. Five minutes later, hehehe, I opened the now-default-settings BIOS, set it to boot from CD, and away I was.

    Moral:_ANYTHING_ can be bypassed so long as the intruder is determined, and having physical access to the hardware (locked case or not) certainly helps. Linux probably might have helped prevent me from using the disk on key, but it would not have helped prevent me from defeating the BIOS.

    --
    It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  41. Re:Industry standards by ledow · · Score: 2, Informative

    Obviously a troll but...

    Nope.

    The education system has a responsibility to teach it's kids skills for the future. Absent an actual time machine, that means predicting what they will be using in the future and giving them the best start you can from that information.

    On that front, education fails miserably in almost all countries when it comes to Computer Science.

    I was "officially" taught, between 1985 and 2000, BBC Micros, BBC BASIC, Windows 3.1 and (in the last year of University) Java. By the time I was taught them, they were already obsolete (I was still being "taught" BBC BASIC in 1997, for example, despite the fact I'd been programming Win32 C programs for about four years in private).

    If I had even been "taught" the current tech as it was, I would have come away an expert in Windows 95 and 98 and would have almost no experience in Windows 2000. Now, to someone willing to go on to learn further, that's not too bad. But most people stop learning when they leave school, so we'd have an entire nation who, at absolute best, would be trained up on and never want to leave Windows 98.

    Additionally, most SENSIBLE education systems (and that might accidentally include the UK National Curriculum but that's purely coincedental given the state of the rest of the UK education system) NEVER recommend the use of a particular product but a general overview of the type of hardware/software. If your schools teaches MSAccess courses, leave now. If they teach Database classes that just happen to use or prefer MSAccess, you're okay. Because by the time the kids grow up and get into a serious career almost nothing they would have learned in school would be useful or relevant unless they were taught generalities.

    Even in Science - if I was rigourously taught that there were nine planets, I was wrong. The only way to counteract that is to keep up as best you can (although most places still teach that there are nine planets!), explain that things change and teach generalaties (i.e. know that a planet is an object of certain size that orbits the sun, rather than that Pluto is a planet, always will be a planet and can't be anything else). Like science, education has to keep up with modern trends but, like science, it has to be impartial and generalise information rather than teach by rote. Otherwise we'd all still be being taught that the Earth was flat.

  42. no "-1 Drunk Ramblings" by Chrisq · · Score: 2, Funny

    It would have to come with a health warning: Three pints and a keyboard can severely damage your karma.

  43. Re:Linux by antiseptic_poetry · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's bullsh#t. In Windows Group Policy Manager, enable User Configuration > Administrative Templates > System > Scripts > Run logon scripts synchronously. This tells Windows is disallow any user interactive (i.e. no desktop, no windows explorer, no nothing) after logging in until all login scripts have run. Of course any admin using loginscripts would have this setting enabled.

    I used to work in a highschool, trust me we had to lock the Windows computers down well. There are simple work arounds but for a few things, but they're all solvable with a bit of effort - only stupid admins would roll out a locked standard profile without serious testing anyway.

  44. Re:Linux by innerweb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have seen laptops, that if you popped the battery off to tamper with the BIOS, or if you forgot your password, you have to ship the unit in to have the BIOS reset. I am not sure if anyone has found an exploit on those yet, but that is a step in the direction of security.

    And, yep, it is darned inconvenient for the average Joe. It has a home in the corporate and government worlds though.

    InnerWeb

    --
    Freud might say that Intelligent Design is religion's ID.
  45. Re:One of those tricks by digitalsolo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Myself and another student actually ran the Windows network at my high school. We administered the network and created the majority of the security settings on it. We were able to do it much more efficiently than the the staff, as the other students had no idea we were in charge. Other students would share their little tips and tricks with us, and we would promptly make adjustments to stop them from happening. Surprisingly, the student body never caught on (but rather thought our faculty to be particularly adept) over the 3 years my friends and I held the position. Last I heard, our basic setup was still in place, 6 years after leaving. Apparently a "spy" produced system is superior to the best they could concoct.

    --
    Just another ignorant American.
  46. Re:One of those tricks by Warbothong · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You can do quite a lot with a floppy disk on a school computer. Unfortunately for a guy in my old school that doesn't include dragging the Internet Explorer icon from the desktop to the floppy so that you can get on the Internet at home.

    The guy running the network there was such an ass. He "solved" problems by disabling stuff; by the time I left he had disabled the floppy drives, USB ports, school email, Yahoo/Gmail/Hotmail/etc. and pretty much every way to get work to and from school. Thing is, these were disabled within Windows, so I used a boot floppy to load Damn Small Linux from a USB drive. There's always a way around these things. /me types this from a GNOME session he has started up on his University's supposedly locked-down, Firefox-only Sun Microsystems thin client.